entropy-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Disorder and Biological Physics

A topical collection in Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300). This collection belongs to the section "Non-equilibrium Phenomena".

Viewed by 4728

Editors


E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Interests: stochastic dynamics; nonequilibrium thermodynamics; biophysics

E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Small Biosystems lab, Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Barcelona, Carrer de Martí i Franqués, 1. 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: single-molecule experiments; DNA and RNA biophysics; molecular folding; energy and information in biophysics

E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy
Interests: non-equilibrium phenomena; dynamical systems; statistical mechanics; exactly solvable models
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Topical Collection Information

Dear Colleagues,

The term “disorder” is again in the spotlight: The 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Giorgio Parisi “for the discovery of the interplay of disorder and fluctuations in physical systems from atomic to planetary scales”. This is not the first time the term has been at the center of physicists’ understanding of the complex world—ever since the understanding of entropy in thermal physics as a measure of the random motions of atoms and molecules, disorder, chaos, and random motion have all been used interchangeably in popular writings on thermodynamics and the second law.

This is the domain of statistical mechanics and, in particular, of statistical thermodynamics—one of the main pillars of our fundamental understanding of the complex world made of large collections of interacting constitutive parts. This theory originated from a desire to understand “what is heat” by physicists and “how heat engine works” by engineers. L. Boltzmann was responsible for providing classical thermodynamics a concrete mechanical foundation in terms of atoms and molecules and, together with J. W. Gibbs, introduced the statistical methods that connect individual particles with seemingly random movements with emergent behavior of matters at a macroscopic scale [1]. In the process, they also discovered a deep mathematical relation between mechanical energy and probability, through the concept of temperature, developing a formalism that is now applied well beyond the original calorimetric realm.

Indeed, the different perspectives can be traced back to the founders of the subject. However, the tenets of the theories developed by the two giants are different. Boltzmann’s theory has a clear goal: to provide the classical thermodynamics with a Newtonian mechanical foundation. The first order business is therefore to establish the mechanical origin for the notions of entropy. He accomplished this with the celebrated formula S = kB logW, where W stands for Wahrscheinlichkeit. Gibbs’ theory, on the other hand, is open-ended—after showing a consistency with all classical thermodynamic theory via a mathematical limit, Gibbs’ theory—which accepts the empirical nature of temperature and the concept of statistical ensembles—has been applied to a vast number of systems with ever smaller scales. In the past two decades in biophysics, it has been the workhorse in understanding laboratory measurements on single biological macromolecules in aqueous solutions [2].

On the other hand, the analytic tool that has contributed the most to a precise understanding of all phenomena associated with disorder, chaos, fluctuations, randomness, heterogeneities, etc. is the mathematical theory of “heat” in terms of a heat equation [3] which Einstein used brilliantly, and later the theory of probability whose official year of conception was 1933 [4]—many decades after the work of Boltzmann and Gibbs, but only a decade before E. Schrödinger’s call for attention to the statistical laws of nature [5] and for a understanding of biological systems in terms of neg-entropy [6].

Through the work of L. Onsager on irreversible processes with the conception of thermodynamic forces and fluxes, the Brussels–Dutch school of thermodynamics and the formalization of entropy production, and the recent development in fluctuation theorems and equalities in stochastic processes, Schrödinger’s neg-entropy and its fundamental roles in biochemical systems and cellular functions have been firmly established and nonequilibrium stochastic thermodynamics has found many applications in biology [7].

On the other hand, Gibbs’ statistical thermodynamics has found a close partner in the mathematical theory of large deviations [8]. Could Gibbs' method actually provide the “third”, an alternative to the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the statistics of scientific data, and carry on the theoretical physics tradition forward into Biology in the age of Information and Data Science?

Therefore, it is not an uneducated guess that the concept of and analytic tools associated with entropy will find an increasing role in biological physics (or physical biology), which has its central focus on heterogeneity and activity (e.g., diversity and life). We therefore put forward this Topical Collection intended to consider any statistical theory, method, model, or approach aiming to answer a specific biological question. This implies that thermodynamic terms be extended beyond their natural framework, while they still carry a load of thermodynamic implications. Specification of applicability conditions are encouraged so that formally correct relations may acquire explanatory and predictive value.

References

  1. Chibbaro, S.; Rondoni, L.; Vulpiani, A. Reductionism, Emergence and Levels of Reality: The Importance of Being Borderline; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  2. Ritort, F. Single-molecule experiments in biological physics: methods and applications. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, R531–R583.
  3. Fourier, J.B.J. Théorie analytique de la chaleur. Chez Firmin Didot: Paris, France, 1822.
  4. Kolmogoroff, A.N. Grundbegriffe der wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1933.
  5. Schrödinger, E. The statistical law in nature. Nature 1994, 153, 704–705.
  6. Schrödinger, E. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1944.
  7. Qian, H. Phosphorylation energy hypothesis: Open chemical systems and their biological functions. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 113–142.
  8. Vulpiani, A.; Cecconi, F.; Cencini, M.; Puglisi, A.; Vergni, D. Large Deviations in Physics: The Legacy of the Law of Large Numbers; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014.

Prof. Dr. Hong Qian
Dr. Felix Ritort
Prof. Dr. Lamberto Rondoni
Collection Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the collection website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Entropy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (4 papers)

2023

18 pages, 1320 KiB  
Article
Nonequilibrium Effects on Information Recoverability of the Noisy Channels
by Qian Zeng, Ran Li and Jin Wang
Entropy 2023, 25(12), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25121589 - 27 Nov 2023
Viewed by 564
Abstract
We investigated the impact of nonequilibrium conditions on the transmission and recovery of information through noisy channels. By measuring the recoverability of messages from an information source, we demonstrate that the ability to recover information is connected to the nonequilibrium behavior of the [...] Read more.
We investigated the impact of nonequilibrium conditions on the transmission and recovery of information through noisy channels. By measuring the recoverability of messages from an information source, we demonstrate that the ability to recover information is connected to the nonequilibrium behavior of the information flow, particularly in terms of sequential information transfer. We discovered that the mathematical equivalence of information recoverability and entropy production characterizes the dissipative nature of information transfer. Our findings show that both entropy production (or recoverability) and mutual information increase monotonically with the nonequilibrium strength of information dynamics. These results suggest that the nonequilibrium dissipation cost can enhance the recoverability of noise messages and improve the quality of information transfer. Finally, we propose a simple model to test our conclusions and found that the numerical results support our findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 495 KiB  
Article
Energy Conversion and Entropy Production in Biased Random Walk Processes—From Discrete Modeling to the Continuous Limit
by Henning Kirchberg and Abraham Nitzan
Entropy 2023, 25(8), 1218; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081218 - 16 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 822
Abstract
We considered discrete and continuous representations of a thermodynamic process in which a random walker (e.g., a molecular motor on a molecular track) uses periodically pumped energy (work) to pass N sites and move energetically downhill while dissipating heat. Interestingly, we found that, [...] Read more.
We considered discrete and continuous representations of a thermodynamic process in which a random walker (e.g., a molecular motor on a molecular track) uses periodically pumped energy (work) to pass N sites and move energetically downhill while dissipating heat. Interestingly, we found that, starting from a discrete model, the limit in which the motion becomes continuous in space and time (N) is not unique and depends on what physical observables are assumed to be unchanged in the process. In particular, one may (as usually done) choose to keep the speed and diffusion coefficient fixed during this limiting process, in which case, the entropy production is affected. In addition, we also studied processes in which the entropy production is kept constant as N at the cost of a modified speed or diffusion coefficient. Furthermore, we also combined this dynamics with work against an opposing force, which made it possible to study the effect of discretization of the process on the thermodynamic efficiency of transferring the power input to the power output. Interestingly, we found that the efficiency was increased in the limit of N. Finally, we investigated the same process when transitions between sites can only happen at finite time intervals and studied the impact of this time discretization on the thermodynamic variables as the continuous limit is approached. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 445 KiB  
Article
Improvement of Error Correction in Nonequilibrium Information Dynamics
by Qian Zeng, Ran Li and Jin Wang
Entropy 2023, 25(6), 881; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060881 - 31 May 2023
Viewed by 1020
Abstract
Errors are inevitable in information processing and transfer. While error correction is widely studied in engineering, the underlying physics is not fully understood. Due to the complexity and energy exchange involved, information transmission should be considered as a nonequilibrium process. In this study, [...] Read more.
Errors are inevitable in information processing and transfer. While error correction is widely studied in engineering, the underlying physics is not fully understood. Due to the complexity and energy exchange involved, information transmission should be considered as a nonequilibrium process. In this study, we investigate the effects of nonequilibrium dynamics on error correction using a memoryless channel model. Our findings suggest that error correction improves as nonequilibrium increases, and the thermodynamic cost can be utilized to improve the correction quality. Our results inspire new approaches to error correction that incorporate nonequilibrium dynamics and thermodynamics, and highlight the importance of the nonequilibrium effects in error correction design, particularly in biological systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1762 KiB  
Article
Self-Regulated Symmetry Breaking Model for Stem Cell Differentiation
by Madelynn McElroy, Kaylie Green and Nikolaos K. Voulgarakis
Entropy 2023, 25(5), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25050815 - 18 May 2023
Viewed by 1360
Abstract
In conventional disorder–order phase transitions, a system shifts from a highly symmetric state, where all states are equally accessible (disorder) to a less symmetric state with a limited number of available states (order). This transition may occur by varying a control parameter that [...] Read more.
In conventional disorder–order phase transitions, a system shifts from a highly symmetric state, where all states are equally accessible (disorder) to a less symmetric state with a limited number of available states (order). This transition may occur by varying a control parameter that represents the intrinsic noise of the system. It has been suggested that stem cell differentiation can be considered as a sequence of such symmetry-breaking events. Pluripotent stem cells, with their capacity to develop into any specialized cell type, are considered highly symmetric systems. In contrast, differentiated cells have lower symmetry, as they can only carry out a limited number of functions. For this hypothesis to be valid, differentiation should emerge collectively in stem cell populations. Additionally, such populations must have the ability to self-regulate intrinsic noise and navigate through a critical point where spontaneous symmetry breaking (differentiation) occurs. This study presents a mean-field model for stem cell populations that considers the interplay of cell–cell cooperativity, cell-to-cell variability, and finite-size effects. By introducing a feedback mechanism to control intrinsic noise, the model can self-tune through different bifurcation points, facilitating spontaneous symmetry breaking. Standard stability analysis showed that the system can potentially differentiate into several cell types mathematically expressed as stable nodes and limit cycles. The existence of a Hopf bifurcation in our model is discussed in light of stem cell differentiation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop