Teachers' Professional Learning from Education Practices

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Teacher Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 February 2024) | Viewed by 8305

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Achva Academic College, P.M. Shikmim, Arugot 7952500, Israel
Interests: professional development of teachers and educators

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Advanced Studies, Achva Academic College, P.M. Shikmim, Arugot 7952500, Israel
Interests: evaluation in education; political socialization; educational policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

The importance of improving schools, raising teacher quality, and improving the quality of pupils' learning has led to an intense concern with the process of the professional learning and development of teachers as one important way of achieving these goals. Professional learning includes both the formation of teachers' professional identities as well as their professional empowerment.

The education system constantly seeks to promote the quality of its teaching staff. One of the main components expressing its renewal is teachers' professional learning, which is part of turning teaching into a real profession. This structured and methodical process is designed to reinforce the status of teachers throughout their career. Professional learning for those engaged in teaching positions them as experts in their field and as possessing up-to-date pedagogical and educational knowledge that can enhance their work and lead them to develop the profession and their accountability, as well as advance their pupils' achievements.

In the context of the recent research on teachers' professional learning and development, one must comprehend the complexity of the issue, including its three spheres: the micro-sphere, namely, the individual teacher; the meso-sphere namely, the institutional sphere; and the macro-sphere, which includes the education system. These spheres are mutually dependent and reciprocally influential. Professional learning permits a balance between the needs and aims of the individual teacher, the school, and of national and political needs.

The objectives of professional learning are diverse and are supposed to help teachers with their teaching practices. Some of these goals are:

  • Shaping a professional identity to fully exploit the teachers' personal and professional abilities;
  • Increasing personal and professional efficacy to promote teachers' required achievements while performing their job;
  • Understanding the essence of professional commitment to ensure high-quality teaching–learning for the pupils;
  • Ensuring teachers' optimal functioning as members of staff and as partners in the success of the organization employing them;
  • Teachers' professional and personal development as people with an educational, social, and ethical worldview;
  • Enhancing teachers' abilities to cater effectively to pupils, parents, and colleagues to realize the objectives and goals defined according to personal and systemic needs;
  • Enabling upward mobility and advancement in professional rankings;
  • Implementing Ministry of Education policies to achieve the required goals.

Acknowledging teachers' learning as a complex structure involving many mechanisms, actions, and elements confirms that this learning is indeed challenging. There are often contradictions in the goals of professional learning between the needs of the teacher as an individual and the needs of the system, of society, and of educational policies. We expect the articles in this Special Issue to discuss the contradictory logic and the challenges these contradictions pose in the context of teachers' professional learning and development.

Some of the questions addressed by this Special Issue discuss how professional learning and development can be maintained effectively and meaningfully throughout one's teaching career so that every teacher is supported in navigating their learning and professional growth according to their wishes, needs, character, and expertise.

Suggested Topics for the SI:

  1. The challenges of planning professional development programs;
  2. Comparative research of Teachers' Professional Learning around the world;
  3. Professional Development Communities or Teachers' Professional Development Communities;
  4. Teachers' Professional Learning through dialogic evaluation, portfolios, and peer instruction;
  5. Case studies of effective Teachers' Professional Learning;
  6. Characteristics of self-directed learning;
  7. Empowerment of Teachers' Professional Learning among teachers;
  8. Informal and formal professional learning;
  9. Professional growth according to teachers' wishes, needs, character, and expertise;
  10. Digital professional development of teachers;
  11. Personalized continuing professional learning with a global systemic vision;
  12. Other relevant suggestions.

Authors are kindly invited to submit their formatted full papers.

All paper submissions will be blind peer-reviewed and evaluated based on originality, research content, correctness, relevance to the conference, and readability. Please read the complete submission and formatting guidelines of Education Sciences before submitting your paper.

Prof. Dr. Orit Avidov-Ungar
Prof. Dr. Sara Zamir
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • professional learning
  • professional development communities
  • digital development
  • informal and formal professional learning
  • personalization of learning
  • teachers' professional learning through dialogic evaluation

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 964 KiB  
Article
A Holistic Model for Disciplinary Professional Development—Overcoming the Disciplinary Barriers to Implementing ICT in Teaching
by Alisa Amir
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(11), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111093 - 29 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1348
Abstract
What helps teachers overcome technological barriers to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) implementation in their subject domains? Can a disciplinary professional development model help reduce these disciplinary barriers? To answer these questions, this mixed-methods case study examines the change in digital ICT implementation [...] Read more.
What helps teachers overcome technological barriers to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) implementation in their subject domains? Can a disciplinary professional development model help reduce these disciplinary barriers? To answer these questions, this mixed-methods case study examines the change in digital ICT implementation and its barriers among secondary school first language teachers after the utilization of a holistic model for disciplinary professional development (language, science, etc.). Ninety-two first language teachers participated in a professional development program that included a unique instructor profile, theoretical and practical training, technical support, and ongoing individual and school-wide didactic and pedagogical support. The teachers’ experiences and changes in their personal general experience during their professional development were then assessed via interviews and open-ended questionnaires. The findings indicate that the unique professional development model largely removed the teachers’ disciplinary barriers. Specifically, during their professional development, the teachers changed their perceptions of the purposes of ICT in first language teaching in general and teaching writing in particular, indicating that they realized that ICT promotes their discipline and is not merely a tool for lesson diversification or intrigue. Furthermore, they recognized that ICT is not an option but an integral part of teaching in the 21st century. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teachers' Professional Learning from Education Practices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 607 KiB  
Article
Job Satisfaction and Teacher Education: Correlational Study in Postgraduate Graduates in Education
by Carlos Alfredo Pérez Fuentes, Annie Julieth Alvarez Maestre, Angela María Cardona Rivas, Andrea Johanna Aguilar Barreto and Ruth Katherine Sanabria Alarcón
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020198 - 13 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2628
Abstract
Teacher education is recognized as the process of improving teaching practices. During their postgraduate studies, aspiring teachers are encouraged to improve both their teaching practice and their working conditions. Therefore, an expectation for their Masters’ degrees is that upon graduation, they can achieve [...] Read more.
Teacher education is recognized as the process of improving teaching practices. During their postgraduate studies, aspiring teachers are encouraged to improve both their teaching practice and their working conditions. Therefore, an expectation for their Masters’ degrees is that upon graduation, they can achieve job satisfaction. This study had a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional and correlational non-experimental research design. Its objective was to analyze the level of job satisfaction of working teachers after graduating with a Master’s degree in Education, and with this, to correlate sociodemographic variables with the level of job satisfaction. As an information-collection technique, the Job Satisfaction Scale for Teachers (ESLA) was used, which has reliability for internal consistency of 0.88 in Cronbach’s alpha. The results show that teachers graduating with a Master’s degree in Education score significant levels of job satisfaction, ranging between high and moderate, confirming that, as in other studies, with greater possibilities of qualification and teacher preparation, job satisfaction is maintained or generated. The statistical hypothesis testing method of inferential statistics confirmed that moderate and high levels of job satisfaction can be maintained in working teachers after graduating from postgraduate training, without implying relationships with gender, the type of hiring, doctoral degrees, type of contracts or the type of educational institution where they work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teachers' Professional Learning from Education Practices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1064 KiB  
Article
Student Teachers’ Knowledge of Multiperspectivity and Its Implementation in Geography Lesson Plans: Results from an Exploratory Qualitative Study with German and Dutch Student Teachers
by Dina Vasiljuk, Alexandra Budke, Veit Maier and Uwe Krause
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(12), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120861 - 25 Nov 2022
Viewed by 2613
Abstract
This exploratory qualitative study reports student teachers’ knowledge of multiperspectivity as well as how student teachers consider multiperspectivity in lesson planning. The study was embedded in a project in which German and Dutch student teachers dealt with multiperspectivity for one semester. Based on [...] Read more.
This exploratory qualitative study reports student teachers’ knowledge of multiperspectivity as well as how student teachers consider multiperspectivity in lesson planning. The study was embedded in a project in which German and Dutch student teachers dealt with multiperspectivity for one semester. Based on the theoretical literature and the empirical results, we identified a set of criteria for multiperspectivity in geography lessons. These criteria were then applied to analyse the student teachers’ lesson plans and teaching materials as well as the student teachers’ answers in the qualitative questionnaires, which the student teachers answered at the beginning and at the end of the semester. The results of this study showed that the professional knowledge of student teachers in terms of multiperspectivity was not extensively represented or apparent from the answers to either the pre- or the postquestionnaire. The analysis of the lesson plans and the teaching materials showed that the student teacher groups were able to form a multiperspective topic didactically. However, not all groups had considered promoting evaluation competence in lesson planning, and the reflection competence was hardly considered. Therefore, our developed criteria for multiperspectivity in geography lessons could help student teachers to better understand and consider multiperspectivity when planning lessons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teachers' Professional Learning from Education Practices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop