Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR)

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 August 2024 | Viewed by 1541

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, The Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
Interests: MDR in microbes; antifungal activity; lipophilicity; antibacterial activity; 1,4-Dihydropyridine derivatives
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, 581243 Bratislava, Slovakia
Interests: environmental and food microbiology; antibiotic resistance; molecular biology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia
Interests: MDR in leukemia; ABC transporters; ER stress and MDR; altered protein glycosylation in MDR leukemia
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Interests: biofilm; Candida; MRSA; virulence; resistance; farnesol; photodynamic inactivation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the course of evolution, living organisms have developed multiple mechanisms of response to harmful chemicals present in the environment. These substances may attack genes (via modification, mutation and degradation of DNA), proteins, phospholipids, sugars and other intracellular components (via sets of modification reactions including radical oxidation). Toxic attack of these substances leads to cell death in the case of lethal concentration. Sub-lethal concentrations of such substances may induce cell adaptation to toxic stress, which will lead to decreased cellular sensitivity and tolerance. Under permanent sublethal toxic pressure cells are able to respond via activation of diverse well-defined cell defensive pathways. Activation of cell defense pathways subsequently leads to an increase in cells' tolerance often resulting in resistance to different chemicals with principally diverse structures and mechanisms of action. Almost all cell types are able to respond this way. The development of drug resistance represents a real obstacle in antimicrobial and anticancer treatment. The above-described decrease in cells' sensitivity to various unrelated drugs is known as multidrug resistance (MDR). Xenobiotic detoxification involves a step-by-step mechanism (detoxification phase I–III). The first step is the conversion of the hydrophobic nature of molecules (which allows the molecule to be easily transported through the cell membrane) to metabolic intermediates that are more water-soluble. The transforming enzymes alter compounds by oxidation, reduction or hydrolysis, to make them either more readily excretable or less pharmacologically active. These reactions are mediated by the versatile cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the more selective flavin-containing monooxygenases, and monoamine oxidases. Altered compounds are subject to conjugation enzymes in the process of glucuronidation, acetylation, sulfation, glutathione conjugation, acetylation, aminoacyl conjugation or methylation by conjugating enzymes of phase II detoxification. These processes are adjusting the toxic compounds as substrates for the membrane transporters (predominantly from the ABC and MFS family) that ensure their transport out of the cell. These membrane transporters are known as systems of phase III of detoxification.

In addition to drug modification/elimination under phases I–III of cell detoxification, tolerance/resistance of cells against toxic compounds could be influenced by alteration in ER stress development, cell death progression, DNA repair, epigenetics regulation and others. Parallel to these mechanisms, the balance in prooxidation/antioxidation status of cells represents another important feature responsible for the capability of cells to enter the process of death.

We are looking forward to your contributions to this Special Issue.

Dr. Petra Olejníková
Dr. Lucia Bírošová
Prof. Dr. Albert Breier
Prof. Dr. Helena Bujdáková
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multidrug resistance (MDR)
  • detoxification
  • cellular drug modification/elimination
  • ER stress
  • cell death
  • DNA repair
  • epigenetics regulation

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1664 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Two Candida parapsilosis Isolates Originating from the Same Patient Harbouring the Y132F and R398I Mutations in the ERG11 Gene
by Matúš Štefánek, Martina Garaiová, Adam Valček, Luisa Jordao and Helena Bujdáková
Cells 2023, 12(12), 1579; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12121579 - 07 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1142
Abstract
This work presents a comparative analysis of two clinical isolates of C. parapsilosis, isolated from haemoculture (HC) and central venous catheter (CVC). Both strains harboured Y132F and R398I mutations in the gene ERG11 associated with resistance to fluconazole (FLC). Differences between the [...] Read more.
This work presents a comparative analysis of two clinical isolates of C. parapsilosis, isolated from haemoculture (HC) and central venous catheter (CVC). Both strains harboured Y132F and R398I mutations in the gene ERG11 associated with resistance to fluconazole (FLC). Differences between the HC and CVC isolates were addressed in terms of virulence, resistance to FLC, and lipid distribution. Expression of the ERG6 and ERG9 genes, lipid analysis, fatty acid composition, and lipase activity were assessed via qPCR, thin-layer chromatography/high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and spectrophotometry, respectively. Regulation of the ERG6 and ERG9 genes did not prove any impact on FLC resistance. Analysis of lipid metabolism showed a higher accumulation of lanosterol in both the isolates regardless of FLC presence. Additionally, a decreased level of triacylglycerols (TAG) with an impact on the composition of total fatty acids (FA) was observed for both isolates. The direct impact of the ERG11 mutations on lipid/FA analysis has not been confirmed. The higher lipase activity observed for C. parapsilosis HC isolate could be correlated with the significantly decreased level of TAG. The very close relatedness between both the isolates suggests that one isolate was derived from another after the initial infection of the host. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop