Special Issue "Latest Advancements in Health-Related Quality of Life Research in Cancer Survivorship"

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 March 2024 | Viewed by 1423

Special Issue Editors

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Kurbadstraße 14, 1100 Vienna, Austria
Interests: cancer rehabilitation; supportive care of cancer; outcome research; psycho-oncology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Interests: side effects management; supportive care & cancer rehabilitation; prehabilitation; exercise
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The continuing improvement of early detection and screening measures, as well as advancements in treatments, coupled with a progressively aging population, has resulted in increased numbers of cancer survivors. This, in turn, has led to increased interest in and emphasis on assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) o this population. Clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies are being designed accordingly, including long-term follow-up to assess late effects of treatment and HRQoL in addition to the more traditional assessments of cancer outcomes, such as survival or other clinical parameters.

In light of this, we have proposed a Special Issue of Cancers dedicated to exploring the recent developments in HRQoL in the context of cancer survivorship. We welcome submissions focusing on clinical trials and other studies assessing long-term HRQoL trajectories; methodological papers, including both qualitative and quantitative research into HRQoL in cancer survivorship, are also of interest.

In recognition of the many demands on researchers and clinicians’ time, we have proposed a six-month window between acceptance of inclusion into the Special Issue and submission of a final draft of the manuscript for peer review.

Please notify us of your interest and proposed title by 30 September 2023. You will be notified of our decision to accept by 31 October 2023. Final manuscripts should be submitted by 31 March 2024 for publication on 31 July 2024.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,
Prof. Dr. Thomas Licht
Prof. Dr. Richard Crevenna
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cancer survivors
  • oncology
  • psycho-oncology
  • health-related quality of life
  • patient-reported outcome measures
  • self-report

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 914 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life Reporting in Phase III RCTs of Advanced Genitourinary Tumors
Cancers 2023, 15(23), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235703 - 04 Dec 2023
Viewed by 295
Abstract
Background: As recommended in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be a relevant endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer therapies. However, previous publications by our group and others revealed a [...] Read more.
Background: As recommended in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be a relevant endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer therapies. However, previous publications by our group and others revealed a frequent underestimation and underreporting of HRQoL results in publication of RCTs in oncology. Herein, we systematically reviewed HRQoL reporting in RCTs testing new treatments in advanced prostate, kidney and urothelial cancers and published between 2010 and 2022. Methods: We searched PubMed RCTs testing novel therapies in genitourinary (GU) cancers and published in fifteen selected journals (Annals of Oncology, BMC Cancer, British Journal of Cancer, Cancer Discovery, Clinical Cancer Research, Clinical Genitourinary cancer, European Journal of Cancer, European Urology, European Urology Oncology, JAMA, JAMA Oncology, Journal of clinical Oncology, Lancet, Lancet Oncology and The New England Journal of Medicine). We excluded trials investigating exclusively best supportive care or behavioral intervention, as well as subgroup or post hoc analyses of previously published trials. For each RCT, we investigated whether HRQoL assessment was performed by protocol and if results were reported in the primary manuscript or in a secondary publication. Results: We found 85 eligible trials published between 2010 and 2022. Only 1/85 RCTs (1.2%) included HRQoL among primary endpoints. Of note, 25/85 (29.4%) RCTs did not include HRQoL among study endpoints. HRQoL results were non-disclosed in 56/85 (65.9%) primary publications. Only 18/85 (21.2%) publications fulfilled at least one item of the CONSORT-PRO checklist. Furthermore, 14/46 (30.4%) RCTs in prostate cancer, 12/25 (48%) in kidney cancer and 3/14 (21.4%) in urothelial cancer reported HRQoL data in primary publications. Next, HRQoL data were disclosed in primary manuscripts of 12/32 (37.5%), 5/13 (38.5%), 5/16 (31.3%) and 5/15 (33.3%) trials evaluating target therapies, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and new hormonal agents, respectively. Next, we found that HRQoL data were reported in 16/42 (38%) and in 13/43 (30.2%) positive and negative trials, respectively. Finally, the rate of RCTs reporting HRQoL results in primary or secondary publications was 55.3% (n = 47/85). Conclusions: Our analysis revealed a relevant underreporting of HRQoL in RCTs in advanced GU cancers. These results highlight the need to dedicate more attention to HRQoL in RCTs to fully assess the value of new anticancer treatments. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 1068 KiB  
Article
“Is My Brain Ever Going to Work Fully Again?”: Challenges and Needs of Cancer Survivors with Persistent Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5331; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225331 - 08 Nov 2023
Viewed by 860
Abstract
Many cancer survivors experience cognitive impairments that impact memory, concentration, speed of information processing, and decision making. These impairments, collectively known as cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCIs), are a key domain of unmet needs and can significantly impact a cancer survivor’s identity and quality [...] Read more.
Many cancer survivors experience cognitive impairments that impact memory, concentration, speed of information processing, and decision making. These impairments, collectively known as cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCIs), are a key domain of unmet needs and can significantly impact a cancer survivor’s identity and quality of life. However, there are no purpose-built, multi-domain, needs assessment tools specifically for CRCI. The development of such tools requires an in-depth understanding of cancer survivors’ CRCI-specific challenges and associated needs. This study explored the challenges and associated needs of cancer survivors with persistent CRCI. An in-depth qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with (a) cancer survivors with perceived CRCI (n = 32) and (b) oncology health professionals (n = 19) was utilised. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews resulted in five overarching themes: (1) executing regular activities, (2) relational difficulties, (3) occupational functioning, (4) psychological distress, and (5) social functioning, as well as an additional informational needs domain. Ultimately, CRCI was found to directly produce a range of challenges that negatively, and persistently, impact cancer survivors’ quality of life. Cancer survivors were also found to have a range of needs associated with these challenges. This research should be used to inform future challenges and needs assessment tools as well as treatment and supportive care priority areas directly relating to CRCI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: “Is my brain ever going to work fully again?”: Challenges and Needs of Cancer Survivors with Persistent Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment
Authors: Dr. Darren Haywood 1,2,3*, Evan Dauer 2, Dr. Frank. D Baughman 4, Dr. Blake Lawrence 4, Prof. Susan L. Rossell 2,5, A/Prof Nicolas H. Hart 1,6,7,8,9 & A/Prof Moira O’Connor 4
Affiliation: 1 Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), NSW, Australia. 2 Department of Mental Health, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.   3 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4 School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia. 5 Centre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia 6 Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, SA, Australia. 7 Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), QLD, Australia. 8 Exercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, WA, Australia 9 Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, WA, Australia
Abstract: A significant proportion of people who have undergone cancer therapy experience negative impacts on their cognitive ability [1]. Cancer survivors often describe this phenomenon as a ‘fog’ that impacts various cognitive domains, including memory, concentration, speed of information processing, and decision-making [1]. This ‘fog’ is commonly referred to as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). CRCI can significantly impact a person’s identity, relationships, and workplace confidence [16]. There is a significant need for a purpose-built needs assessment for persistent CRCI that is relevant across cancer and treatment types and provides information for health professionals to facilitate the optimal choice of treatment, support, and referral options [19]. The development of a widely applicable, purpose-built, needs assessment for persistent CRCI first requires an in-depth understanding of CRCI specific challenges, and associated needs, based on an established quality of life framework. An in-depth qualitative study design was used to explore the perceived challenges resulting from CRCI and the associated needs of cancer survivors and health professionals. 51 people were interviewed (19 oncology health professionals, 32 cancer survivors), and the data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were organised into 5 overarching themes: (1) executing regular activities, (2) relational difficulties, (3) occupational functioning, (4) psychological distress, and (5) social functioning. In addition, informational needs related to CRCI was a key element that both groups of participants discussed. Ultimately, CRCI is associated with a wide range of difficulties that negatively and persistently impact a cancer survivor’s quality of life. There is also a range of unmet needs directly associated with CRCI specific difficulties, and no practical, purpose-built tool to support health professionals to explicitly understand the specific needs of each cancer survivor. This research should be used to inform future challenges and needs assessment tools as well as treatment and supportive care priority areas directly relating to CRCI.

Back to TopTop