Scientific and Clinical Advances in Neurological Surgery

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 July 2023) | Viewed by 6219

Special Issue Editors

Departments of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
Interests: neurosurgery; neuroscience; neuroanatomy; neurosurgical operative techniques; minimal invasive surgery; neurovascular surgery; glioma surgery; skull base surgery; human pain system; intraoperative technologies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Department of Neurological Surgery, St. John’s Neuroscience Institute, Tulsa, OK, USA
Interests: neurovascular; neuroscience; neuroanatomy; stem cell; neurosurgical operative techniques; minimal invasive surgery; neurovascular surgery; glioma surgery; skull base surgery
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
Interests: neuroscience; neuroanatomy; stroke; minimal invasive cranial surgery; spine surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is crucial to adopt the advance of neurosurgery in the daily practice of patient care and surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. This special issue is dedicated to scientific and clinical advances in neurological surgery.

We invite the authors to submit their papers about neurological surgery and neuroscience.

This special issue highlights the novel neurosurgical techniques, neurological or neurosurgical case series, microsurgical and endoscopic neuroanatomy, brain tumors, skull base tumors, spine, endo- and neurovascular procedures, pre- or intraoperative technologies, neurotrauma, peripheral nerve surgeries, functional neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation, focused ultrasounds, etc.), neuroimaging studies (MRI, DSA, DTI, etc.), as well as neuroscience, biomedical and translational research.  

Dr. Kaan Yagmurlu
Dr. M. Yashar S. Kalani
Dr. Sauson Soldozy
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • clinical studies
  • neurosurgical technologies
  • neurosurgical techniques
  • cranial and spinal trauma
  • neuroscience studies

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 3580 KiB  
Article
The Use of 3D Printed Models for Surgical Simulation of Cranioplasty in Craniosynostosis as Training and Education
by Jean Francois Uhl, Albert Sufianov, Camillo Ruiz, Yuri Iakimov, Huerta Jose Mogorron, Manuel Encarnacion Ramirez, Guillermo Prat, Barbara Lorea, Matias Baldoncini, Evgeniy Goncharov, Issael Ramirez, José Rafael Cerda Céspedes, Renat Nurmukhametov and Nicola Montemurro
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(6), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060894 - 01 Jun 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 912
Abstract
Background: The advance in imaging techniques is useful for 3D models and printing leading to a real revolution in many surgical specialties, in particular, neurosurgery. Methods: We report on a clinical study on the use of 3D printed models to perform cranioplasty in [...] Read more.
Background: The advance in imaging techniques is useful for 3D models and printing leading to a real revolution in many surgical specialties, in particular, neurosurgery. Methods: We report on a clinical study on the use of 3D printed models to perform cranioplasty in patients with craniosynostosis. The participants were recruited from various medical institutions and were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 5) received traditional surgical education (including cadaveric specimens) but without using 3D printed models, while Group B (n = 5) received training using 3D printed models. Results: Group B surgeons had the opportunity to plan different techniques and to simulate the cranioplasty. Group B surgeons reported that models provided a realistic and controlled environment for practicing surgical techniques, allowed for repetitive practice, and helped in visualizing the anatomy and pathology of craniosynostosis. Conclusion: 3D printed models can provide a realistic and controlled environment for neurosurgeons to develop their surgical skills in a safe and efficient manner. The ability to practice on 3D printed models before performing the actual surgery on patients may potentially improve the surgeons’ confidence and competence in performing complex craniosynostosis surgeries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific and Clinical Advances in Neurological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1054 KiB  
Article
Size of Craniectomy Predicts Approach-Related Shear Bleeding in Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
by Martin Vychopen, Johannes Wach, Tim Lampmann, Harun Asoglu, Hartmut Vatter and Erdem Güresir
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(3), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030371 - 21 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1167
Abstract
Decompressive craniectomy is an option to decrease elevated intracranial pressure in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the size of the bone flap according to approach-related complications in patients with poor-grade SAH. We retrospectively [...] Read more.
Decompressive craniectomy is an option to decrease elevated intracranial pressure in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the size of the bone flap according to approach-related complications in patients with poor-grade SAH. We retrospectively analyzed poor-grade SAH patients (WFNS 4 and 5) who underwent aneurysm clipping and craniectomy (DC or ommitance of bone flap reinsertion). Postoperative CT scans were analyzed for approach-related tissue injury at the margin of the craniectomy (shear bleeding). The size of the bone flap was calculated using the De Bonis equation. Between 01/2012 and 01/2020, 67 poor-grade SAH patients underwent clipping and craniectomy at our institution. We found 14 patients with new shear bleeding lesion in postoperative CT scan. In patients with shear bleeding, the size of the bone flap was significantly smaller compared to patients without shear bleeding (102.1 ± 45.2 cm2 vs. 150.8 ± 37.43 cm2, p > 0.0001). However, we found no difference in mortality rates (10/14 vs. 23/53, p = 0.07) or number of implanted VP shunts (2/14 vs. 18/53, p = 0.2). We found no difference regarding modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 6 months postoperatively. In poor-grade aneurysmal SAH, the initial planning of DC—if deemed necessary —and enlargement of the flap size seems to decrease the rate of postoperatively developed shear bleeding lesions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific and Clinical Advances in Neurological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1331 KiB  
Article
Clinical Study of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recordings during Awake and Asleep Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Guang-Rui Zhao, Yi-Feng Cheng, Ke-Ke Feng, Min Wang, Yan-Gang Wang, Yu-Zhang Wu and Shao-Ya Yin
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(11), 1469; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111469 - 29 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1463
Abstract
Our objective is to analyze the difference of microelectrode recording (MER) during awake and asleep subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the necessity of MER during “Asleep DBS” under general anesthesia (GA). The differences in MER, target accuracy, [...] Read more.
Our objective is to analyze the difference of microelectrode recording (MER) during awake and asleep subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the necessity of MER during “Asleep DBS” under general anesthesia (GA). The differences in MER, target accuracy, and prognosis under different anesthesia methods were analyzed. Additionally, the MER length was compared with the postoperative electrode length by electrode reconstruction and measurement. The MER length of two groups was 5.48 ± 1.39 mm in the local anesthesia (LA) group and 4.38 ± 1.43 mm in the GA group, with a statistical significance between the two groups (p < 0.01). The MER length of the LA group was longer than its postoperative electrode length (p < 0.01), however, there was no significant difference between the MER length and postoperative electrode length in the GA group (p = 0.61). There were also no significant differences in the postoperative electrode length, target accuracy, and postoperative primary and secondary outcome scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that “Asleep DBS” under GA is comparable to “Awake DBS” under LA. GA has influences on MER during surgery, but typical STN discharges can still be recorded. MER is not an unnecessary surgical procedure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific and Clinical Advances in Neurological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 372 KiB  
Article
A Validation Study for SHE Score for Acute Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly
by Martin Vychopen, Motaz Hamed, Majd Bahna, Attila Racz, Inja Ilic, Abdallah Salemdawod, Matthias Schneider, Felix Lehmann, Lars Eichhorn, Christian Bode, Andreas H. Jacobs, Charlotte Behning, Patrick Schuss, Erdem Güresir, Hartmut Vatter and Valeri Borger
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(8), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12080981 - 26 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1557
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was the verification of the Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly (SHE) score proposed by Alford et al. as a mortality predictor in patients older than 65 years with nontraumatic/minor trauma acute subdural hematoma (aSDH). Additionally, we evaluated [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this study was the verification of the Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly (SHE) score proposed by Alford et al. as a mortality predictor in patients older than 65 years with nontraumatic/minor trauma acute subdural hematoma (aSDH). Additionally, we evaluated further predictors associated with poor outcome. Methods: Patients were scored according to age (1 point is given if patients were older than 80 years), GCS by admission (1 point for GCS 5–12, 2 points for GCS 3–4), and SDH volume (1 point for volume 50 mL). The sum of points determines the SHE score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify additional independent risk factors associated with 30-day mortality. Results: We evaluated 131 patients with aSDH who were treated at our institution between 2008 and 2020. We observed the same 30-day mortality rates published by Alford et al.: SHE 0: 4.3% vs. 3.2%, p = 1.0; SHE 1: 12.2% vs. 13.1%, p = 1.0; SHE 2: 36.6% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.8; SHE 3: 97.1% vs. 95.7%, p = 1.0 and SHE 4: 100% vs. 100%, p = 1.0. Additionally, 18 patients who developed status epilepticus (SE) had a mortality of 100 percent regardless of the SHE score. The distribution of SE among the groups was: 1 for SHE 1, 6 for SHE 2, 9 for SHE 3, and 2 for SHE 4. The logistic regression showed the surgical evacuation to be the only significant risk factor for developing the seizure. All patients who developed SE underwent surgery (p = 0.0065). Furthermore, SHE 3 and 4 showed no difference regarding the outcome between surgical and conservative treatment. Conclusions: SHE score is a reliable mortality predictor for minor trauma acute subdural hematoma in elderly patients. In addition, we identified status epilepticus as a strong life-expectancy-limiting factor in patients undergoing surgical evacuation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific and Clinical Advances in Neurological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop