Understanding the Molecular Diversity of Astrocytes

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neuroglia".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (18 October 2019) | Viewed by 19912

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
Interests: astrocyte; receptor; signalling; noradrenaline; G-protein coupled receptors; glioblastoma; imaging; patch clamp; neuroprotection; optogenetics; Ca2+; cAMP; brainstem; cardio-respiratory control
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Astrocytes have been recognised as important players in a wide range of brain functions. Both physiological and pathological processes are mediated, supported or assisted by astrocytes. We also now know that these cells are extremely dynamic and their plasticity is manifested not only by the level of GFAP expression but by a wide range of transcriptional adaptations. Recent evidence also indicates that astrocytes in different parts of the brain have different genetic fingerprints. In fact, some studies suggest that even in the same structure (e.g., the cortex of the hippocampus) there are multiple genetically distinct populations of astrocytes. But, how many genuine sub-types that can be reliably functionally and anatomically distinguished are actually there?

Our current knowledge of astrocytic transcriptomes comes from studies which have used very different methods, and this is an important factor. There are published transcriptomes of cultured astrocytes subjected to various treatment protocols [1,2], transcriptomes from cells isolated using immune-panning from enzymatically digested tissues [3,4] or astrocytes isolated using FACS from lines of mice expressing fluorescent proteins [5], TRAP and RiboTag technology have been employed as well [6-9]. Notably, there are also single-cell transcriptomes [10,11].

Each of the experimental approaches and specific paradigms used to challenge astrocytes will have consequences for what we see, and it is important to keep these differences in mind when trying to make sense of the plethora of published transcriptomic data.

We believe it is time for the leading laboratories to discuss their findings in one volume where we focus readers’ attention on the key questions: how much does our “vision” of astrocytes depend on the experimental conditions, and what are the take-home messages of the transcriptomic data so far?

Reference

  1. Hasel, P.; Dando, O.; Jiwaji, Z.; Baxter, P.; Todd, A.C.; Heron, S.; Márkus, N.M.; McQueen, J.; Hampton, D.W.; Torvell, M.; et al. Neurons and neuronal activity control gene expression in astrocytes to regulate their development and metabolism. Commun. 2017, 8, 15132.
  2. Qiu, J.; Dando, O.; Baxter, P.S.; Hasel, P.; Heron, S.; Simpson, T.I.; Hardingham, G.E. Mixed-species RNA-seq for elucidation of non-cell-autonomous control of gene transcription. Protoc. 2018, 13, 2176–2199.
  3. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Münch, A.E.; Chung, W.-S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Cell Boil. 2017, 541, 481–487.
  4. Zhang, Y.; Chen, K.; Sloan, S.A.; Bennett, M.L.; Scholze, A.R.; O'Keeffe, S.; Phatnani, H.P.; Guarnieri, P.; Caneda, C.; Ruderisch, N.; et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 11929–11947.
  5. Morel, L.; Men, Y.; Chiang, M.S.R.; Tian, Y.; Jin, S.; Yelick, J.; Higashimori, H.; Yang, Y. Intracortical astrocyte subpopulations defined by astrocyte reporter Mice in the adult brain. Glia 2019, 67, 171–181.
  6. Bellesi, M.; De Vivo, L.; Tononi, G.; Cirelli, C. Transcriptome profiling of sleeping, waking, and sleep deprived adult heterozygous Aldh1L1–eGFP-L10a mice. Data 2015, 6, 114–117.
  7. Chai, H.; Diaz-Castro, B.; Shigetomi, E.; Monte, E.; Octeau, J.C.; Yu, X.; Cohn, W.; Rajendran, P.S.; Vondriska, T.M.; Whitelegge, J.P.; et al. Neural Circuit-Specialized Astrocytes: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Morphological, and Functional Evidence. Neuron 2017, 95, 531–549.
  8. Itoh, N.; Itoh, Y.; Tassoni, A.; Ren, E.; Kaito, M.; Ohno, A.; Ao, Y.; Farkhondeh, V.; Johnsonbaugh, H.; Burda, J.; et al. Cell-specific and region-specific transcriptomics in the multiple sclerosis model: Focus on astrocytes. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E302–E309.
  9. Anderson, M.A.; Burda, J.E.; Ren, Y.; Ao, Y.; O'Shea, T.M.; Kawaguchi, R.; Coppola, G.; Khakh, B.S.; Deming, T.J.; Sofroniew, M.V. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 2016, 532, 195–200.
  10. Thomsen, E.R.; Mich, J.K.; Yao, Z.; Hodge, R.D.; Doyle, A.M.; Jang, S.; Shehata, S.I.; Nelson, A.M.; Shapovalova, N.V.; Levi, B.P.; Ramanathan, S. Fixed single-cell transcriptomic characterization of human radial glial diversity. Methods 2016, 13, 87–93.
  11. Wu, Y.E.; Pan, L.; Zuo, Y.; Li, X.; Hong, W. Detecting Activated Cell Populations Using Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Neuron 2017, 96, 313–329.

Prof. Dr. Sergey Kasparov
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

11 pages, 1938 KiB  
Article
AEG-1 Regulates TWIK-1 Expression as an RNA-Binding Protein in Astrocytes
by Hyun-Gug Jung, Ajung Kim, Seung-Chan Kim, Jae-Yong Park and Eun Mi Hwang
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010085 - 11 Jan 2021
Viewed by 2212
Abstract
AEG-1, also called MTDH, has oncogenic potential in numerous cancers and is considered a multifunctional modulator because of its involvement in developmental processes and inflammatory and degenerative brain diseases. However, the role of AEG-1 in astrocytes remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate [...] Read more.
AEG-1, also called MTDH, has oncogenic potential in numerous cancers and is considered a multifunctional modulator because of its involvement in developmental processes and inflammatory and degenerative brain diseases. However, the role of AEG-1 in astrocytes remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate proteins directly regulated by AEG-1 by analyzing their RNA expression patterns in astrocytes transfected with scramble shRNA and AEG-1 shRNA. AEG-1 knockdown down-regulated TWIK-1 mRNA. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and immunocytochemistry assays confirmed that AEG-1 modulates TWIK-1 mRNA and protein expression. Electrophysiological experiments further revealed that AEG-1 further regulates TWIK-1-mediated potassium currents in normal astrocytes. An RNA immunoprecipitation assay to determine how AEG-1 regulates the expression of TWIK-1 revealed that AEG-1 binds directly to TWIK-1 mRNA. Furthermore, TWIK-1 mRNA stability was significantly increased upon overexpression of AEG-1 in cultured astrocytes (p < 0.01). Our findings show that AEG-1 serves as an RNA-binding protein to regulate TWIK-1 expression in normal astrocytes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding the Molecular Diversity of Astrocytes)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1546 KiB  
Article
Epileptiform Neuronal Discharges Impair Astrocyte Syncytial Isopotentiality in Acute Hippocampal Slices
by Qi Wang, Wei Wang, Sydney Aten, Conrad M. Kiyoshi, Yixing Du and Min Zhou
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(4), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10040208 - 02 Apr 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2965
Abstract
Astrocyte syncytial isopotentiality is a physiological mechanism resulting from a strong electrical coupling among astrocytes. We have previously shown that syncytial isopotentiality exists as a system-wide feature that coordinates astrocytes into a system for high efficient regulation of brain homeostasis. Neuronal activity is [...] Read more.
Astrocyte syncytial isopotentiality is a physiological mechanism resulting from a strong electrical coupling among astrocytes. We have previously shown that syncytial isopotentiality exists as a system-wide feature that coordinates astrocytes into a system for high efficient regulation of brain homeostasis. Neuronal activity is known to regulate gap junction coupling through alteration of extracellular ions and neurotransmitters. However, the extent to which epileptic neuronal activity impairs the syncytial isopotentiality is unknown. Here, the neuronal epileptiform bursts were induced in acute hippocampal slices by removal of Mg2+ (Mg2+ free) from bath solution and inhibition of γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors by 100 µM picrotoxin (PTX). The change in syncytial coupling was monitored by using a K+ free-Na+-containing electrode solution ([Na+]p) in the electrophysiological recording where the substitution of intracellular K+ by Na+ ions dissipates the physiological membrane potential (VM) to ~0 mV in the recorded astrocyte. However, in a syncytial coupled astrocyte, the [Na+]p induced VM loss can be compensated by the coupled astrocytes to a quasi-physiological membrane potential of ~73 mV. After short-term exposure to this experimental epileptic condition, a significant closure of syncytial coupling was indicated by a shift of the quasi-physiological membrane potential to −60 mV, corresponding to a 90% reduction of syncytial coupling strength. Consequently, the closure of syncytial coupling significantly decreased the ability of the syncytium for spatial redistribution of K+ ions. Altogether, our results show that epileptiform neuronal discharges weaken the strength of syncytial coupling and that in turn impairs the capacity of a syncytium for spatial redistribution of K+ ions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding the Molecular Diversity of Astrocytes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1037 KiB  
Article
Fumaric Acids Do Not Directly Influence Gene Expression of Neuroprotective Factors in Highly Purified Rodent Astrocytes
by Kaweh Pars, Marina Gingele, Jessica Kronenberg, Chittappen K Prajeeth, Thomas Skripuletz, Refik Pul, Roland Jacobs, Viktoria Gudi and Martin Stangel
Brain Sci. 2019, 9(9), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9090241 - 19 Sep 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2778
Abstract
(1) Background: Dimethylfumarate (DMF) has been approved for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. However, the mode of action of DMF and its assumed active primary metabolite monomethylfumarate (MMF) is still not fully understood. Former reports suggest a neuroprotective effect of DMF [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Dimethylfumarate (DMF) has been approved for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. However, the mode of action of DMF and its assumed active primary metabolite monomethylfumarate (MMF) is still not fully understood. Former reports suggest a neuroprotective effect of DMF mediated via astrocytes by reducing pro-inflammatory activation of these glial cells. We investigated potential direct effects of DMF and MMF on neuroprotective factors like neurotrophic factors and growth factors in astrocytes to elucidate further possible mechanisms of the mode of action of fumaric acids; (2) Methods: highly purified cultures of primary rat astrocytes were pre-treated in vitro with DMF or MMF and incubated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or a mixture of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) plus interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) in order to simulate an inflammatory environment. The gene expression of neuroprotective factors such as neurotrophic factors (nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)) and growth factors (fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), platelet-derived growth factor subunit A (PDGFa), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF)) as well as cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)) was examined by determining the transcription level with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR); (3) Results: The stimulation of highly purified astrocytes with either LPS or cytokines changed the expression profile of growth factors and pro- inflammatory factors. However, the expression was not altered by either DMF nor MMF in unstimulated or stimulated astrocytes; (4) Conclusions: There was no direct influence of fumaric acids on neuroprotective factors in highly purified primary rat astrocytes. This suggests that the proposed potential neuroprotective effect of fumaric acid is not mediated by direct stimulation of neurotrophic factors in astrocytes but is rather mediated by other pathways or indirect mechanisms via other glial cells like microglia as previously demonstrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding the Molecular Diversity of Astrocytes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 1022 KiB  
Review
No Longer Underappreciated: The Emerging Concept of Astrocyte Heterogeneity in Neuroscience
by Francisco Pestana, Gabriela Edwards-Faret, T. Grant Belgard, Araks Martirosyan and Matthew G. Holt
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(3), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10030168 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 58 | Viewed by 11235
Abstract
Astrocytes are ubiquitous in the central nervous system (CNS). These cells possess thousands of individual processes, which extend out into the neuropil, interacting with neurons, other glia and blood vessels. Paralleling the wide diversity of their interactions, astrocytes have been reported to play [...] Read more.
Astrocytes are ubiquitous in the central nervous system (CNS). These cells possess thousands of individual processes, which extend out into the neuropil, interacting with neurons, other glia and blood vessels. Paralleling the wide diversity of their interactions, astrocytes have been reported to play key roles in supporting CNS structure, metabolism, blood-brain-barrier formation and control of vascular blood flow, axon guidance, synapse formation and modulation of synaptic transmission. Traditionally, astrocytes have been studied as a homogenous group of cells. However, recent studies have uncovered a surprising degree of heterogeneity in their development and function, in both the healthy and diseased brain. A better understanding of astrocyte heterogeneity is urgently needed to understand normal brain function, as well as the role of astrocytes in response to injury and disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding the Molecular Diversity of Astrocytes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop