Human Movement and Ergonomics

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomechanics and Sports Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 June 2023) | Viewed by 13271

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: ergonomics; ergonomic risk assessment; human movement; motion analysis; inertial motion capture; musculoskeletal disorders; biomechanics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: ergonomics; dentistry; biomechanical analyses; occupational medicine; posture analysis; ergonomic risk assessement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: functional movements; motor learning; ergonomics; ergonomic risk assessment; human motion analysis; myography; EEG; EMG; neural control of human movement

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Musculoskeletal disorders are still one of the most popular reasons for incapacity for work and have diseases such as mental illnesses or upper respiratory tract diseases the highest prevalence. The relevance of ergonomic-optimized occupational settings is still outstanding in the field of occupational health, while the possibilities in the field of human movement and motion analysis and the resulting application options have evolved. Modern capabilities in motion analysis, such as inertial motion capture systems, enable much better quantification of posture and human motion in the field, allowing ergonomic derivations to be optimized and numerous applications, such as exoskeletons and other assistive devices, to be developed. Further fields of application that are not related to occupational health are prosthesis development or diagnostics by means of gait analysis. This Special Issue of Bioengineering on Human Movement and Ergonomics will focus on research papers and comprehensive reviews addressing the central role of modern methodologies assessing human movement and improving ergonomics bringing together contributions from worldwide experts on ergonomics, ergonomic risk assessment, motion analysis, posture and wearables.

Dr. Fabian Holzgreve
Prof. Dr. Daniela Ohlendorf
Dr. Christian Maurer-Grubinger
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  •  kinematics
  •  biomechanics
  •  motion analysis
  •  motion capture
  •  posture
  •  musculoskeletal dynamics
  •  risk assessment
  •  musculoskeletal disorders
  •  wearables

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

17 pages, 3827 KiB  
Article
The Comfort and Measurement Precision-Based Multi-Objective Optimization Method for Gesture Interaction
by Wenjie Wang, Yongai Hou, Shuangwen Tian, Xiansheng Qin, Chen Zheng, Liting Wang, Hepeng Shang and Yuangeng Wang
Bioengineering 2023, 10(10), 1191; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10101191 - 13 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1042
Abstract
As an advanced interaction mode, gestures have been widely used for human–computer interaction (HCI). This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization method based on the objective function JCP to solve the inconsistency between the gesture comfort JCS and measurement precision [...] Read more.
As an advanced interaction mode, gestures have been widely used for human–computer interaction (HCI). This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization method based on the objective function JCP to solve the inconsistency between the gesture comfort JCS and measurement precision JPH in the gesture interaction. The proposed comfort model CS takes seventeen muscles and six degrees of freedom into consideration based on the data from muscles and joints, and is capable of simulating the energy expenditure of the gesture motion. The CS can provide an intuitive indicator to predict which act has the higher risk of fatigue or injury for joints and muscles. The measurement precision model PH is calculated from the measurement error (XH,YH,ZH) caused by calibration, that provides a means to evaluate the efficiency of the gesture interaction. The modeling and simulation are implemented to analyze the effectiveness of the multi-objective optimization method proposed in this paper. According to the result of the comparison between the objective function JCS, based on the comfort model CS, and the objective function JPH, based on the measurement precision models PH, the consistency and the difference can be found due to the variation of the radius rB_RHO and the center coordinates PB_RHOxB_RHO,yB_RHO,zB_RHO. The proposed objective function JCP compromises the inconsistency between the objective function JCS and JPH. Therefore, the multi-objective optimization method proposed in this paper is applied to the gesture design to improve the ergonomics and operation efficiency of the gesture, and the effectiveness is verified through usability testing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1621 KiB  
Article
Correlations between Ratings and Technical Measurements in Hand-Intensive Work
by Gunilla Dahlgren, Per Liv, Fredrik Öhberg, Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm, Mikael Forsman and Börje Rehn
Bioengineering 2023, 10(7), 867; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070867 - 21 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1403
Abstract
An accurate rating of hand activity and force is essential in risk assessment and for the effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. However, it is unclear whether the subjective ratings of workers and observers correlate to corresponding objective technical measures of exposure. Fifty-nine [...] Read more.
An accurate rating of hand activity and force is essential in risk assessment and for the effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. However, it is unclear whether the subjective ratings of workers and observers correlate to corresponding objective technical measures of exposure. Fifty-nine workers were video recorded while performing a hand-intensive work task at their workplace. Self-ratings of hand activity level (HAL) and force (Borg CR10) using the Hand Activity Threshold Limit Value® were assessed. Four ergonomist observers, in two pairs, also rated the hand activity and force level for each worker from video recordings. Wrist angular velocity was measured using inertial movement units. Muscle activity in the forearm muscles flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) was measured with electromyography root mean square values (RMS) and normalized to maximal voluntary electrical activation (MVE). Kendall’s tau-b correlations were statistically significant between self-rated hand activity and wrist angular velocity at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles (0.26, 0.31, and 0.23) and for the ratings of observers (0.32, 0.41, and 0.34). Significant correlations for force measures were found only for observer-ratings in five of eight measures (FCR 50th percentile 0.29, time > 10%MVE 0.43, time > 30%MVE 0.44, time < 5% −0.47) and ECR (time > 30%MVE 0.26). The higher magnitude of correlation for observer-ratings suggests that they may be preferred to the self-ratings of workers. When possible, objective technical measures of wrist angular velocity and muscle activity should be preferred to subjective ratings when assessing risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 673 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Peripheral Vision on Manual Reaction Time Using Fitlight Technology for Handball, Basketball and Volleyball Players
by Dana Badau, Alina Mihaela Stoica, Marin Florin Litoi, Adela Badau, Daniel Duta, Cezar Gheorghe Hantau, Anca Maria Sabau, Bogdan Marian Oancea, Catalin Vasile Ciocan, Julien Leonard Fleancu and Bogdan Gozu
Bioengineering 2023, 10(6), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060697 - 07 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2611
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to identify the impact of peripheral (unilateral and bilateral) vision on manual reaction time to visual stimuli in handball, basketball and volleyball players by implementing a 6-week experimental program of specific exercises and some adapted tests using [...] Read more.
The purpose of the research was to identify the impact of peripheral (unilateral and bilateral) vision on manual reaction time to visual stimuli in handball, basketball and volleyball players by implementing a 6-week experimental program of specific exercises and some adapted tests using Fitlight technology. The research included 412 players (212 male—51.5%; 200 female—48.5%) from three team sports: basketball—146 (35.4%), handball—140 (40%) and volleyball—126 (30.6%). The experimental program carried out over 6 weeks was identical for all handball, basketball and volleyball players participating in the study; two training sessions per week were performed, with each session lasting 30 min; 15 exercises were used for the improvement of manual reaction time to visual stimuli involving peripheral vision. Through the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we identified statistically significant differences between the arithmetic means of the samples of handball, basketball and volleyball players, as well as according to general samples also of gender (male and female), p = 0.000. Male and female handball samples achieved the greatest progress in manual reaction time to visual stimuli involving peripheral vision for the Reaction time test with a unilateral right visual stimulus (30 s) and the Reaction time test with a unilateral left visual stimulus (30 s), while general sample also of male and female basketball samples, for the Reaction time test with bilateral visual stimuli (30 s) and the Reaction time test with six Fitlights (1 min); male and female volleyball samples recorded the lowest progress in all tests compared to handball and basketball groups. According to our results, female samples made greater progress in reaction time than male groups for all four tests of the present study. The implemented experimental program led to an improvement in manual reaction time to visual stimuli due to the use of Fitlight technology and the involvement of peripheral vision for all research samples. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 603 KiB  
Article
A Twenty-Year Retrospective Analysis of Risk Assessment of Biomechanical Overload of the Upper Limbs in Multiple Occupational Settings: Comparison of Different Ergonomic Methods
by Emma Sala, Lorenzo Cipriani, Andrea Bisioli, Emilio Paraggio, Cesare Tomasi, Pietro Apostoli and Giuseppe De Palma
Bioengineering 2023, 10(5), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050580 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1361
Abstract
Background: Several methods with which to assess the risk of biomechanical overload of the upper limb are described in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the results of the risk assessment of the biomechanical overload of the upper limb in multiple settings by [...] Read more.
Background: Several methods with which to assess the risk of biomechanical overload of the upper limb are described in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the results of the risk assessment of the biomechanical overload of the upper limb in multiple settings by comparing the application of the Washington State Standard, the threshold limit values (TLV) proposed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), based on hand-activity levels (HAL) and normalised peak force (PF), the Occupational Repetitive Actions (OCRA) checklist, the Rapid Upper-Limb Assessment (RULA), and the Strain Index and Outil de Repérage et d’Evaluation des Gestes of INRS (Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité). Results: Overall, 771 workstations were analysed for a total of 2509 risk assessments. The absence of risk demonstrated for the Washington CZCL, used as the screening method, was in good agreement with the other methods, with the sole exception of the OCRA CL, which showed at-risk conditions in a higher percentage of workstations. Differences in the assessment of the frequency of actions were observed among the methods, while their assessments of strength appeared to be more uniform. However, the greatest discrepancies were observed in the assessment of posture. Conclusions: The use of multiple assessment methods ensures a more adequate analysis of biomechanical risk, allowing researchers to investigate the factors and segments in which different methods show different specificities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1689 KiB  
Article
Testing the Level of Agreement between Two Methodological Approaches of the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) for Occupational Health Practice—An Exemplary Application in the Field of Dentistry
by Ramona Nowara, Fabian Holzgreve, Rejane Golbach, Eileen M. Wanke, Christian Maurer-Grubinger, Christina Erbe, Doerthe Brueggmann, Albert Nienhaus, David A. Groneberg and Daniela Ohlendorf
Bioengineering 2023, 10(4), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040477 - 15 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1616
Abstract
Background: The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) is used for the risk assessment of workplace-related activities. Thus far, the paper and pen method (RULA-PP) has been predominantly used for this purpose. In the present study, this method was compared with an RULA evaluation [...] Read more.
Background: The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) is used for the risk assessment of workplace-related activities. Thus far, the paper and pen method (RULA-PP) has been predominantly used for this purpose. In the present study, this method was compared with an RULA evaluation based on kinematic data using inertial measurement units (RULA-IMU). The aim of this study was, on the one hand, to work out the differences between these two measurement methods and, on the other, to make recommendations for the future use of the respective method on the basis of the available findings. Methods: For this purpose, 130 (dentists + dental assistants, paired as teams) subjects from the dental profession were photographed in an initial situation of dental treatment and simultaneously recorded with the IMU system (Xsens). In order to compare both methods statistically, the median value of the difference of both methods, the weighted Cohen’s Kappa, and the agreement chart (mosaic plot) were applied. Results: In Arm and Wrist Analysis—area A—here were differences in risk scores; here, the median difference was 1, and the agreement in the weighted Cohen’s kappa test also remained between 0.07 and 0.16 (no agreement to poor agreement). In area B—Neck, Trunk, and Leg Analysis—the median difference was 0, with at least one poor agreement in the Cohen’s Kappa test of 0.23–0.39. The final score has a median of 0 and a Cohen’s Kappa value of 0.21–0.28. In the mosaic plot, it can be seen that RULA-IMU had a higher discriminatory power overall and more often reached a value of 7 than RULA-PP. Conclusion: The results indicate a systematic difference between the methods. Thus, in the RULA risk assessment, RULA-IMU is mostly one assessment point above RULA-PP. Therefore, future study results of RULA by RULA-IMU can be compared with literature results obtained by RULA-PP to further improve the risk assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 788 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Postural Sway in Women with Osteoporosis and a Control Group by Means of Linear and Nonlinear Methods
by Felix Stief, Anna Sohn, Lutz Vogt, Andrea Meurer and Marietta Kirchner
Bioengineering 2023, 10(4), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040403 - 24 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1070
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying the altered postural control and risk of falling in patients with osteoporosis are not yet fully understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate postural sway in women with osteoporosis and a control group. The postural sway of [...] Read more.
The mechanisms underlying the altered postural control and risk of falling in patients with osteoporosis are not yet fully understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate postural sway in women with osteoporosis and a control group. The postural sway of 41 women with osteoporosis (17 fallers and 24 non-fallers) and 19 healthy controls was measured in a static standing task with a force plate. The amount of sway was characterized by traditional (linear) center-of-pressure (COP) parameters. Structural (nonlinear) COP methods include spectral analysis by means of a 12-level wavelet transform and a regularity analysis via multiscale entropy (MSE) with determination of the complexity index. Patients showed increased body sway in the medial–lateral (ML) direction (standard deviation in mm: 2.63 ± 1.00 vs. 2.00 ± 0.58, p = 0.021; range of motion in mm: 15.33 ± 5.58 vs. 10.86 ± 3.14, p = 0.002) and more irregular sway in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction (complexity index: 13.75 ± 2.19 vs. 11.18 ± 4.44, p = 0.027) relative to controls. Fallers showed higher-frequency responses than non-fallers in the AP direction. Thus, postural sway is differently affected by osteoporosis in the ML and AP directions. Clinically, effective assessment and rehabilitation of balance disorders can benefit from an extended analysis of postural control with nonlinear methods, which may also contribute to the improvement of risk profiles or a screening tool for the identification of high-risk fallers, thereby prevent fractures in women with osteoporosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

38 pages, 1633 KiB  
Review
A Review on the Usability, Flexibility, Affinity, and Affordability of Virtual Technology for Rehabilitation Training of Upper Limb Amputees
by Xiangyu Liu, Di Zhang, Ke Miao, Yao Guo, Xinyu Jiang, Xi Zhang, Fumin Jia, Hao Tang and Chenyun Dai
Bioengineering 2023, 10(11), 1301; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111301 - 09 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1322
Abstract
(1) Background: Prosthetic rehabilitation is essential for upper limb amputees to regain their ability to work. However, the abandonment rate of prosthetics is higher than 50% due to the high cost of rehabilitation. Virtual technology shows potential for improving the availability and cost-effectiveness [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Prosthetic rehabilitation is essential for upper limb amputees to regain their ability to work. However, the abandonment rate of prosthetics is higher than 50% due to the high cost of rehabilitation. Virtual technology shows potential for improving the availability and cost-effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation. This article systematically reviews the application of virtual technology for the prosthetic rehabilitation of upper limb amputees. (2) Methods: We followed PRISMA review guidance, STROBE, and CASP to evaluate the included articles. Finally, 17 articles were screened from 22,609 articles. (3) Results: This study reviews the possible benefits of using virtual technology from four aspects: usability, flexibility, psychological affinity, and long-term affordability. Three significant challenges are also discussed: realism, closed-loop control, and multi-modality integration. (4) Conclusions: Virtual technology allows for flexible and configurable control rehabilitation, both during hospital admissions and after discharge, at a relatively low cost. The technology shows promise in addressing the critical barrier of current prosthetic training issues, potentially improving the practical availability of prosthesis techniques for upper limb amputees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

11 pages, 1391 KiB  
Brief Report
The Three-Dimensional Body Center of Mass at the Workplace under Hypogravity
by Tatiana Maillard
Bioengineering 2023, 10(10), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10101221 - 19 Oct 2023
Viewed by 911
Abstract
The center of mass dynamics of the seated posture of humans in a work environment under hypogravity (0 < g < 1) have rarely been investigated, and such research is yet to be carried out. The present study determined the difference in the [...] Read more.
The center of mass dynamics of the seated posture of humans in a work environment under hypogravity (0 < g < 1) have rarely been investigated, and such research is yet to be carried out. The present study determined the difference in the body system of 32 participants working under simulated 1/6 g (Moon) and 1 g (Earth) for comparison using static and dynamic task measurements. This was based on a markerless motion capture method that analyzed participants’ center of mass at the start, middle and end of the task when they began to get fatigued. According to this analysis, there is a positive relationship (p < 0.01) with a positive coefficient of correlation between the downward center of mass body shift along the proximodistal axis and gravity level for males and females. At the same time, the same positive relationship (p < 0.01) between the tilt of the body backward along the anterior–posterior axis and the level of gravity was found only in females. This offers fresh perspectives for comprehending hypogravity in a broader framework regarding its impact on musculoskeletal disorders. It can also improve workplace ergonomics, body stability, equipment design, and biomechanics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Movement and Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop