Antimicrobials in Primary Care: Advances, Failures and Prospects

A special issue of Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2023) | Viewed by 4315

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
1. Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l’Innovation (DRCI), Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois, 74370 Epargny Mets-Tessy, France
2. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, F-75012 Paris, France
Interests: antibiotic prescribing; primary care

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The main challenge in the fight against antibiotic resistance (AMR) is the successful implementation of national action plans, which include policies and strategies for proper antibiotic use and infection control. Although these national AMR action plans have been implemented for decades, the volume of antibiotic prescriptions remains very high in most countries. Up to 90% of antibiotic prescriptions are initiated in primary care.

Reducing the overall volume of antibiotic use and improving the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed would help prevent the spread of AMR. To this end, numerous interventions have been implemented worldwide, some formally evaluated. The effectiveness of population-based information campaigns in reducing antibiotic use has been low in Europe. Multimodal approaches combining the enablement and restriction of prescribing as well as auditing and feedback of antibiotic prescribing quality indicators to prescribers have been associated with improved compliance with guidelines. Patient involvement through shared decision-making with clinicians for antibiotic prescribing has also been shown to be effective in the short term, but robust endpoints such as infection-related mortality or reinfection are lacking. New technologies such as computerized decision support systems (CDSS) or artificial intelligence programs for antimicrobial prescribing could be effective and have a prolonged impact on practice. This has been demonstrated primarily in the hospital setting, where the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is common compared with primary care. However, these programs may encounter low adherence to the advice they generate, leading to mixed effects on the volume and quality of antibiotic therapy prescribed. It is therefore essential that innovative antimicrobial prescribing interventions be tailored and integrated into the daily workflow of clinical practice, with a minimal impact on the consultation time and on the patient–practitioner relationship.

However, the very definition of primary care and the parameters to be used to evaluate interventions vary within and between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. In addition, while it is important to identify effective interventions in order to implement them through national action plans, it is essential to know which ones are not and to understand the determinants of their success/failure in order to avoid their deployment and diffusion. It is also essential to gather information on populations or settings that are typically overlooked in studies: children, pharmacists, nursing homes, and dental care.

In this Special Issue, we will consider any high-quality qualitative or quantitative research dealing with antimicrobial use in primary care, including general practice and the above subpopulations, with a focus on interventions to prevent AMR:

  • What interventions have worked in primary care, or not, and why?
  • What is the next intervention to implement in primary care? In what subpopulation?
  • What metrics and models should be used to evaluate primary care interventions?
  • What are the benefits/challenges of involving parents, pharmacists, dental surgeons, nurses, and the communities at large in the fight against AMR?

Dr. Tristan Delory
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Antibiotics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • antimicrobial prescribing
  • antimicrobial stewardship
  • primary care
  • general practitioner
  • paediatrics
  • pharmacists
  • dental care
  • nursing homes
  • intervention
  • metrics

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 889 KiB  
Article
Comments by Microbiologists for Interpreting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Improving the Appropriateness of Antibiotic Therapy in Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Double-Blind Digital Case-Vignette Controlled Superiority Trial
by Emilie Piet, Youssoupha N’Diaye, Johann Marzani, Lucas Pires, Hélène Petitprez and Tristan Delory
Antibiotics 2023, 12(8), 1272; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081272 - 02 Aug 2023
Viewed by 923
Abstract
In primary care, urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for the majority of antibiotic prescriptions. Comments from microbiologists on interpreting the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) profile for urinalysis were made to improve the prescription of antibiotics. We aimed to explore the added value of [...] Read more.
In primary care, urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for the majority of antibiotic prescriptions. Comments from microbiologists on interpreting the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) profile for urinalysis were made to improve the prescription of antibiotics. We aimed to explore the added value of these comments on the quality of antibiotic prescribing by a superior double-blind digital randomized case-vignette trial among French general practitioners (GPs). One case vignette with (intervention) or without (control) a ‘comment’ after AST was randomly assigned to GPs. Among 815 participating GPs, 64.7% were women, at an average age of 37 years. Most (90.1%) used a computerized decision support system for prescribing antibiotics. Empirical antibiotic therapy was appropriate in 71.9% (95% CI, 68.8–75.0) of the cases, without differences between arms. The overall appropriateness of targeted antibiotic therapy (primary outcome) was not significantly increased when providing ‘comments’: 83.4% vs. 79.9% (OR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.86–1.85). With the multivariate analysis, the appropriateness was improved by 2-folds (OR = 2.38, 95% CI, 1.02–6.16) among physicians working in healthcare facilities. Among digital-affine young general practitioners, the adjunction of a ‘comment’ by a microbiologist to interpret urinalysis in community-acquired UTIs did not improve the overall level of appropriateness of the targeted antibiotic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobials in Primary Care: Advances, Failures and Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1091 KiB  
Article
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Antibiotic Utilisation in Malaysian Primary Care Clinics: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
by Audrey Huili Lim, Norazida Ab Rahman, Hazimah Hashim, Mardhiyah Kamal, Tineshwaran Velvanathan, Mary Chiew Fong Chok and Sheamini Sivasampu
Antibiotics 2023, 12(4), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040659 - 28 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1332
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a dramatic change in the delivery of primary healthcare across the world, presumably changing trends in consultations for infectious diseases and antibiotic use. This study aimed at describing and evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic use [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a dramatic change in the delivery of primary healthcare across the world, presumably changing trends in consultations for infectious diseases and antibiotic use. This study aimed at describing and evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic use in public primary care clinics in Malaysia between 2018 and 2021. Data from the nationwide procurement database of systemic antibiotics from public primary care clinics in Malaysia between January 2018 and December 2021 were analysed using interrupted time series analysis. The monthly number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) was calculated and grouped by antibiotic class. The trend of antibiotic utilisation rates had been decreasing by 0.007 DID monthly before March 2020 (p = 0.659). With the introduction of national lockdown due to COVID-19 beginning March 2020, there was a significant reduction in the level of antibiotic utilisation rates of 0.707 (p = 0.022). Subsequently, the monthly trend showed a slight upward change until the end of the study period (p = 0.583). Our findings indicate that there was a significant decrease in antibiotic utilisation for systemic use in primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the preceding years (January 2018–March 2020). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobials in Primary Care: Advances, Failures and Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1366 KiB  
Article
Antibiotic Prescribing in Outpatient Settings: Rural Patients Are More Likely to Receive Fluoroquinolones and Longer Antibiotic Courses
by Haley J. Appaneal, Aisling R. Caffrey, Vrishali Lopes, David Dosa and Kerry L. LaPlante
Antibiotics 2023, 12(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020224 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1641
Abstract
Suboptimal antibiotic prescribing may be more common in patients living in rural versus urban areas due to various factors such as decreased access to care and diagnostic testing equipment. Prior work demonstrated a rural health disparity of overprescribing antibiotics and longer durations of [...] Read more.
Suboptimal antibiotic prescribing may be more common in patients living in rural versus urban areas due to various factors such as decreased access to care and diagnostic testing equipment. Prior work demonstrated a rural health disparity of overprescribing antibiotics and longer durations of antibiotic therapy in the United States; however, large-scale evaluations are limited. We evaluated the association of rural residence with suboptimal outpatient antibiotic use in the national Veterans Affairs (VA) system. Outpatient antibiotic dispensing was assessed for the veterans diagnosed with an upper respiratory tract infection (URI), pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI), or skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in 2010–2020. Rural–urban status was determined using rural–urban commuting area codes. Suboptimal antibiotic use was defined as (1) outpatient fluoroquinolone dispensing and (2) longer antibiotic courses (>ten days). Geographic variation in suboptimal antibiotic use was mapped. Time trends in suboptimal antibiotic use were assessed with Joinpoint regression. While controlling for confounding, the association of rurality and suboptimal antibiotic use was assessed with generalized linear mixed models with a binary distribution and logit link, accounting for clustering by region and year. Of the 1,405,642 veterans diagnosed with a URI, PNA, UTI, or SSTI and dispensed an outpatient antibiotic, 22.8% were rural-residing. In 2010–2020, in the rural- and urban-residing veterans, the proportion of dispensed fluoroquinolones declined by 9.9% and 10.6% per year, respectively. The rural-residing veterans were more likely to be prescribed fluoroquinolones (19.0% vs. 17.5%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–1.04) and longer antibiotic courses (53.8% vs. 48.5%; aOR, 1.19, 95% CI, 1.18–1.20) than the urban-residing veterans. Among a large national cohort of veterans diagnosed with URIs, PNA, UTIs, and SSTIs, fluoroquinolone use and longer antibiotic courses were disproportionally more common among rural- as compared to urban-residing veterans. Outpatient antibiotic prescribing must be improved, particularly for rural-residing patients. There are many possible solutions, of which antibiotic stewardship interventions are but one. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobials in Primary Care: Advances, Failures and Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop