Next Issue
Volume 2, March
 
 

Grasses, Volume 1, Issue 1 (December 2022) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 266 KiB  
Review
Grasscycling: A Key Practice for Sustainable Turfgrass Management
by Cristina Pornaro, Alberto Novello, Micheal Fidanza and Stefano Macolino
Grasses 2022, 1(1), 45-52; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses1010005 - 12 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1811
Abstract
For aesthetic considerations, grass clippings are removed from lawns during mowing. When turfgrass clippings are returned, this practice is called “mulching” or grasscycling. Thus, grasscycling has increasingly become a standard practice for low-input lawns managed under a simpler maintenance system, and grasscycling has [...] Read more.
For aesthetic considerations, grass clippings are removed from lawns during mowing. When turfgrass clippings are returned, this practice is called “mulching” or grasscycling. Thus, grasscycling has increasingly become a standard practice for low-input lawns managed under a simpler maintenance system, and grasscycling has many environmental benefits. Primarily, grasscycling facilitates an increase in soil nitrogen content and soil carbon sequestered by the turfgrass ecosystem. Several studies reported that grasscycling positively influences turfgrass colour and quality. When clippings are returned, turfgrass colour and quality can be maintained with a lower amount of fertilisation than turfgrass with clipping removal. Together with these positive effects, grasscycling practices can contribute to an increase of thatch in the turfgrass sward, while its influence on weed invasion is still questionable. This grasscycling practice can result in a maintenance cost-savings and represent a low-input approach to turfgrass management in terms of nutrients returned and utilised by the turfgrass, and with carbon (C) emissions mitigated and C sequestered. The unwelcome appearance linked to grass clipping residues and vegetation on the turfgrass canopy can be easily obviated by the use of machinery that delivers clippings forcefully toward the ground to incorporate them into the verdure or by using mowers that produce clippings small enough to be returned and quickly decomposed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Turfgrass Management)
1 pages, 159 KiB  
Editorial
Welcome to the New Journal: Grasses
by Fabio Gresta
Grasses 2022, 1(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses1010004 - 09 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1759
Abstract
As Editor-in-Chief, I am very proud to announce the launch of Grasses (ISSN: 2813-3463) [...] Full article
14 pages, 3220 KiB  
Article
Diagnosis of the Spatial Variability of Soil Nutrients and Economics of Precision Management in Degraded Pastures
by Jefferson Santana da Silva Carneiro, Rubson da Costa Leite, José Moisés Ferreira Junior, Álvaro José Gomes de Faria, Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva, Antonio Clementino dos Santos and Rubens Ribeiro da Silva
Grasses 2022, 1(1), 30-43; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses1010003 - 23 Nov 2022
Viewed by 1416
Abstract
Most Brazilian pastures are in some stage of degradation, either by the reduction of soil fertility or inadequate management. The objective of this study was to diagnose the stage of pasture degradation and the diagnosis and management of the spatial variability of available [...] Read more.
Most Brazilian pastures are in some stage of degradation, either by the reduction of soil fertility or inadequate management. The objective of this study was to diagnose the stage of pasture degradation and the diagnosis and management of the spatial variability of available phosphorus (P) and potassium (K+). A total of 100 soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–20 cm for available P and K+ contents determination. Geostatistical analyses of the obtained data were carried out to produce maps of the spatial distribution of available P and K+, using kriging, and allow the recommendation of fertilizers doses. The cost/benefit ratio of fertilizer recommendation and application was evaluated at fixed and variable rates. The different stages of pasture degradation were directly related to the reduction of soil fertility, as well as to the adopted management. The variability of soil available P and K+ presented spatial dependence, and the pattern of distribution resulted in the stage of the pasture degradation. The diagnosis of the level of pasture degradation associated with the use of geostatistical techniques under a precision agriculture perspective favors the efficient use of fertilizers, as well as correct decision-making and cost reduction regarding soil management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3668 KiB  
Article
How Seasonal Grazing Exclusion Affects Grassland Productivity and Plant Community Diversity
by Zhenyin Bai, Aomei Jia, Dongwei Liu, Chengyu Zhang and Mingjun Wang
Grasses 2022, 1(1), 12-29; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses1010002 - 10 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1771
Abstract
The Sanjiang Plain is famous for its concentrated distribution of natural wet grasslands. These wet grasslands are an important source of seasonal pasture or hay in the area. However, changes in community structure and ecosystem function have already occurred in wet grasslands because [...] Read more.
The Sanjiang Plain is famous for its concentrated distribution of natural wet grasslands. These wet grasslands are an important source of seasonal pasture or hay in the area. However, changes in community structure and ecosystem function have already occurred in wet grasslands because of overgrazing and climate change, resulting in severe grassland degradation. Exploring a reasonable grazing management strategy is crucial for improving grassland species diversity, increasing grassland productivity, and maintaining sustainable grassland utilization. We investigated the effects of five grazing management (GM) strategies (no grazing through the growing season (CK), spring grazing exclusion (Spr-GE), summer grazing exclusion (Sum-GE)), autumn grazing exclusion (Aut-GE), and grazing through the growing season (G)) on the productivity, community composition and structure of wet grasslands in the Sanjiang Plain under three grazing intensities (GI) (light (L), moderate (M), and heavy (H)). Results showed that Spr-GE and Sum-GE were beneficial in increasing total aboveground biomass (AGB), but decreased plant community diversity in Spr-GE due to increased intraspecies and interspecies competition. The exclusion of different seasonal grazings changed the composition of plant communities. At the level of functional groups and dominant species, Spr-GE had a significant effect on most functional groups and dominant species’ characteristics, while Aut-GE had little effect on most functional groups and dominant species’ characteristics. However, different functional groups and dominant species had different responses to seasonal grazing exclusion. In addition, under M, there were significantly improved grassland total AGB and PF AGB. The results indicated that Spr-GE with M may be an effective livestock-management strategy to protect grassland vegetation and community diversity, as well as to restore degraded grassland. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1700 KiB  
Article
Seasonal Mass, Performance under Grazing, and Animal Preference for Irrigated Winter Cereal Forages under Continuous Stocking in a Semiarid, Subtropical Region
by Leonard M. Lauriault, Mark A. Marsalis, Shad H. Cox and Glenn C. Duff
Grasses 2022, 1(1), 1-11; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses1010001 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1181
Abstract
Winter annual cereal forages perform well in semiarid, subtropical regions forming, a significant component of livestock operations for autumn through spring stocker cattle (Bos taurus) backgrounding in either grazeout or graze-grain systems; however, little information is available about their relative seasonal [...] Read more.
Winter annual cereal forages perform well in semiarid, subtropical regions forming, a significant component of livestock operations for autumn through spring stocker cattle (Bos taurus) backgrounding in either grazeout or graze-grain systems; however, little information is available about their relative seasonal productivity and animal preference. Seasonal growth and regrowth under grazing and grazing preference of oat (Avena sativa), rye (Secale cereale), triticale (×Triticosecale rimpaui Wittm.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) were compared over two years at New Mexico State University’s Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari. Seasonlong (Nov–Apr) average forage dry matter yield was rye > oat > wheat > triticale (5.03, 4.44, 3.58, and 2.79 Mg ha−1, respectively; p < 0.0001). Rye also had greater average monthly growth than the other cereals, among which there was no difference (1.58, 1.05, 0.96, and 0.85 Mg ha−1 mo−1 for rye, oat, wheat, and triticale, respectively; p < 0.0331). Growth of ungrazed cereals was reduced in mid-winter and regrowth of grazed forage did not equal removal by growing cattle. When given a preference and allowed to deplete available forage, growing cattle preferred oat followed by rye, then wheat and triticale. Regrowth of grazed forage did not differ among cereals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Next Issue
Back to TopTop