Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Characterization of Prophylactic Antimalarial Agents from Ochna kibbiensis Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Angiogenesis under Opioids Preconditioning in Renal Ischemia Reperfusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Indonesian Vegetables: Searching for Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Therapeutic Agents

1
Drug Utilisation and Discovery Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
2
Departement of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathemathics and Natural Sciences, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
3
Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
4
Center of Excellence for Agromedicine (CEAMED), University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
5
Graduate Program of Biotechnology, the Center of Excellence on Crop Industrial Biotechnology (PUI-PT BioTIn), University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
6
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Molecular Horizons, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drugs Drug Candidates 2023, 2(1), 14-36; https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc2010002
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Candidates from Natural Sources)

Abstract

:
Diabetes mellitus prevalence in Indonesia reached 19.5 million cases, which has affected the productive age population. The indigenous people of Indonesia are blessed with the second largest biodiversity in the world, including vegetables, which are also prepared as medicaments. Vegetables are well-known as natural antioxidants which evolved in metabolic disease prevention, including diabetes mellitus. One of the Government of Indonesia’s strategic plans in health is to develop new antidiabetic from nature. In this study, nineteen vegetable species were collected and evaluated for their antioxidant activity followed by computational-based bioprospecting. The study indicated Ipomoea aquatica, Paederia foetida, Plumbago zeylanica, Nauclea pallida, Sauropus androgynus, Wrightia pubescens, and Psophocarpus tetragonolobus to contain high antioxidant components. Computational experiments on chemical constituents previously reported from the same species showed potent compounds with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a). 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 1, stigmasterol 7, and chitanone 12 are the most potent compounds from Ipomoea aquatica, Paederia foetida, and Plumbago zeylanica, respectively, which are superior to a standard drug, acarbose. The four vegetable species are feasible for conventional drug sources or developed as botanical dosage according to the Indonesian government’s strategic plan. Further studies are necessary to ensure adequate preclinical and clinical data to meet the requirement of safe and potent medicine. Nevertheless, Nauclea pallida and Psophocarpus tetragonolobus are valuable species with potent yet understudied antioxidant sources.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex and multifactorial metabolic disorder with the main pathologic condition presented by chronic hyperglycemia. The disease is associated with the impairment of insulin production due to pancreatic β-cells damage and/or peripheral insulin resistance [1]. According to the data released by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), the global prevalence of diabetes in 2019 was 463 million people and will reach 578 million by 2030. There will be at least 700 million people living with diabetes by 2045 if there is no epidemiological intervention [2]. Additionally, the Indonesian Basic Health Research conducted by the Indonesian Ministry of Health in 2018 reported an increase in Indonesian diabetes cases by 2% compared with data in 2013 [3]. The burden of diabetes mellitus is largely due to a wide range of risk factors including obesity, physical inactivity, oxidative stress, and an unhealthy diet low in whole grains, and vegetables [4,5]. Untreated diabetes may result in long-term damage to several organs such as kidneys, nerves, and eyes, leading to diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy [6].
The etiology of DM are genetic factors, environmental factors, circumstances that burden insulin secretion, metabolic abnormalities, mitochondrial abnormalities, and several other conditions that interfere with glucose tolerance. DM can also be caused by pancreatic exocrine disease and disruption of hormones that work as insulin antagonists [7]. DM can be classified into four types. Type 1 is a DM condition caused by autoimmune β-cell damage leading to an absolute insulin deficiency. DM type 2 is caused by the progressive loss of β-cell insulin secretion. DM type 3, Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is diabetes during pregnancy and often recovered after delivery. Type 4 is specific diabetes due to other causes, including a monogenic diabetes syndrome (such as neonatal diabetes and diabetes at a young age), an exocrine pancreatic disease (such as cystic fibrosis and pancreatitis), and a drug-induced or chemically induced diabetes (such as glucocorticoids-induced diabetes, in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, or after transplantation organ) [8].
Several glucose-lowering agents have been prepared to manage glucose levels in diabetes. The α-glucosidase inhibitor is one of the therapeutic agents to modulate the digestion rate of complex carbohydrates and disaccharides by competitively and reversibly inhibiting enzymes present in enterocytes membrane [9]. However, several adverse effects were reported due to the prolonged use of these conventional drugs, which led to the need for alternative options [10]. Natural products have become a reliable source of phytochemical components used as anti-diabetic agents to prevent and manage hyperglycemia [5,11]. Healthy diets containing vegetables rich in naturally occurring phenolics and flavonoids are associated with a lower risk of diabetes [12]. Vegetables constitute antioxidants for maintaining the biological functions of cells such as reducing insulin resistance [12]. Insulin resistance in diabetic complications has been associated with oxidative stress due to overproduction of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13]. ROS have been reported to activate five major pathologic mechanisms, including an increase in protein kinase C isoforms, flux in glucose, expression of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), formation of AGEs in intracellular, and overactivity of hexosamine pathways [13]. Furthermore, the bond between AGE and endothelial cells causes vascular lesions, vasoconstrictors, and thrombosis in people with DM. AGEs that bind to monocytes will later increase chemotaxis and monocyte activation. This event will simultaneously occur with an increase in the number of pro-inflammatory cytokines released, such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 [14,15]. Thus, one of the defense mechanisms for alleviating diabetes complications is through increasing activities and levels of antioxidants in the body. In addition, a meta-analysis study reported consuming 2–3 servings per day of vegetables conferred a lower diabetes mellitus risk [16]. This finding is consistent with most nutritional and global dietary recommendations to consume at least three servings of vegetables per day [17]. In addition, poor daily intake of vegetables is strongly linked to diabetes progression. The majority of evidence reported that vegetables provide an array of healthful phytonutrients in diabetes prevention [11,17]. In Indonesia, an array of vegetable varieties are collected from farms or the wild, in which the indigenous people of Indonesia have used several vegetables as traditional medicaments to cure and prevent diseases including diabetes [18].
The Indonesian government’s master plan for modern medicine development sourced from medicinal plants is to employ adequate pre-clinic and clinic experiments ensuring safe and potent medicine prescribed in the modern health services (Figure 1) [19]. This is including supporting research funds and facilities in discovering new compounds or botanical-based medicine against diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to subject nineteen Indonesian commonly served vegetables to investigate the in vitro antioxidant activity of their ethanolic extract along with an in silico evaluation of their potential antidiabetic activity.

2. Results

Indonesia has abundant vegetable species and is widely consumed as a nutritional source. However, the antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of Indonesian vegetables are not yet fully explored. Around 29 species of vegetables are consumed by the indigenous people of Indonesia, with some species being well distributed across the archipelago (Figure 2). Despite being commonly taken as nutritious diets, the majority of the vegetables are also prepared in traditional medicament to cure several ailments (Table 1). From 24 commonly used vegetables, nineteen species were freshly collected from the traditional market around Jember, Lumajang, Bondowoso, Banyuwangi, and Situbondo Districts in East Java Province, Indonesia. Antioxidant evaluations are summarized in Table 2 where vitamin C, a naturally occurring antioxidant present in vegetables and fruits was used as a standard.
In this study, ethanolic extracts of vegetables were measured for antioxidant activity using several methods including DPPH, superoxide (SO) anion, and hydroxyl free radicals scavenging assay. Among 20 samples of 19 species, the inhibition percentages are shown in Table 2, ranging from 1.32–97.63%. Significant antioxidant activities were found in ethanolic extracts of I. aquatica, closely followed by several species including P. foetida, P. zeylanica, N. pallida, W. pubescens, S. androgynus, and P. tetragonolobus. However, several extracts including M. oleifera, D. esculentum and P. indica showed antioxidant activity variation within three different methods.
Molecular data mining revealed at least several constituents reported from I. aquatica [33,34,35,36], P. foetida [37], P. zeylanica [38,39,40,41], S. androgynus [42,43], and W. pubescens [44,45,46], in which no secondary metabolite isolation was previously reported from N. pallida and P. tetragonolobus. The majority of chemical components were phenolic, flavonoid, and terpenes derivatives with limited alkaloid present. Docking protocols were successfully employed with notable hits of compound, indicating profound interaction compared with the acarbose (Table 3).

3. Discussion

In biological systems, the imbalance of free radicals and antioxidant defense systems promotes oxidative stress, leading to oxidative cell damage [47]. To date, vegetables have been identified as a good source of phytochemicals that are able to downregulate free radical-associated mechanisms of diabetes complications, including diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy [48]. The elevation amounts of glucose diverted into the polyol pathway accelerate the formation and interaction of glycation end products (AGEs) with their receptors, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [49]. ROS can disrupt histones (base) and single- or double-strand of nucleic acid, leading to DNA damage. In consequence, an excess in oxidant species production affects all the layers of the glomerular filtration barrier caused by diabetic kidneys, characterized by the presence of albuminuria [49]. Moreover, in the development of diabetic retinopathy, animal studies demonstrated that excessive levels of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide were reported in the retina of diabetic rats. Further, oxidative damage of DNA occurred and elevated as a consequence of ROS-induced injury [50]. Other than that, glucose metabolic impairment in diabetic nephropathy also causes activation in the polyol pathway, hexosamine pathway, and AGE pathway, which are theorized to generate DNA modification and nerve dysfunction [51]. Therefore, antioxidants are the appropriate strategy aiming to combat the progression of diabetic complications by reducing the oxidant species production.
The development of computational chemistry has significantly provided a range of tools in medicinal chemistry research related to drug discovery and evaluation. Molecular calculation is able to resemble the interaction between enzyme and ligand in vacuo experiments prior to in vitro and/or in vivo evaluation. This application benefits drug discovery by reducing cost and time compared with those of conventional screening, especially in evaluating natural constituents in which compound access is limited naturally [52]. In this study, α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was indirectly explored through a docking protocol against 79 chemotypes based on metabolites from anti-oxidant-rich vegetables (I. aquatica, P. foetida, P. zeylanica, and N. pallida).

3.1. Ipomoea aquatica

I. aquatica, or water spinach, is a common green vegetable widely known by the people of Indonesia as kangkong. This perennial herb belongs to the Convolvulaceae family and is traditionally used to treat constipation and relieve sleep disturbances [53]. As daily consumed vegetables, I. aquatica is habitually growing wild or widely farmed across the archipelago of Indonesia. The antioxidant evaluation showed the ethanolic extract of I. aquatica to have the highest value of antioxidant activity. I. aquatica contains several phenolic compounds such as astragalin 6, 3,5-di-caffeoylquinic acid 2, and 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid 4, which might be responsible for antioxidant activity [34,35,54]. Phenolic compounds are known to have one or more hydroxyl substituents linked to their antioxidant ability as hydrogen- or electron-donating groups and to suppress metal-catalyzed free radical formation [55]. A previous study reported astragalin 6 isolated from Morus alba L. to possess potent antioxidant activity by suppressing 2,2′-azobis(amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced hemolysis in red blood cells and protecting vascular endothelium dysfunction [56,57]. This finding is consistent with an antioxidant ability to prevent microvascular damage linked to diabetic complications. In addition, 3,5-di-caffeoylquinic acid 2 and 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid 4 were also reported as remarkable constituents present in Dipsacus asper Wall. These compounds possessed higher antioxidant activity with IC50 values of 18.2 ± 0.5 and 10.4 ± 0.5 µM compared with caffeic acid as the standard (IC50 = 31.1 ± 1.9 µM) [58].
The computational protocol performed on previously reported secondary metabolites of I. aquatica revealed their antidiabetic activity was superior to the positive control (vitamin C) and the rest of the vegetables. The affinity scores revealed six compounds (7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 1, 3,5-di-O-caffeolyquinic acid 2, luteolin-7-glucoside 3, 4,5-di-O-caffeolyquinic acid 4, quercetin-3,7-di-O-glucoside 5, and astragalin 6, Figure 3) to have sounder exothermic polar correlation (<−9.0 kcal) with alpha-glucosidase enzyme than the standard drug ligand, acarbose (−7.8 kcal). Dehydrogenated quercetin, 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, has a higher affinity than its saturated aglycon version, Quercetin-3,7-di-O-glucoside. This might be due to sp3 at C2 providing a flexible bond that benefits its interaction with the enzyme. In addition, the quercetin derivative molecular size is comparable to the acarbose structure with an equal number of hydrogen bonding and extra interactions due to pi-pi orbital interaction (Figure 4).
Overall, flavonoid and phenolic compounds in general synergistically act to produce a strong antidiabetic effect. Diabetes is a metabolic disorder that can cause vascular and nonvascular complications due to oxidative stress. The formation of oxidative stress in diabetes occurs through three main pathways, i.e., non-enzymatic protein glycation, sorbitol polyol pathway, and glucose auto-oxidation. The antioxidant source of the plants is believed to be able to inhibit all three pathways. Flavonoids are secondary metabolites that have the potential to be antioxidants and have a positive correlation with diabetes therapy [59].

3.2. Paederia foetida

P. foetida is locally known in Indonesia as daun sembukan. This vegetable belongs to the family Rubiaceae and is traditionally used to treat blisters and stomach aches. Our investigation revealed that P. foetida presented potential antioxidant activity against DPPH radical formation. Steroids and monoterpenoids such as stigmasterol 7, α-tocopherol 8, β-sitosterol 10, and asperuloside 11 were reported as several compounds abundant in P. foetida [60]. Stigmasterol 7 isolated from Spondias mombin was previously reported to possess antioxidant properties in Wistar rat experiments, in which the phytosterol decreased production of ROS and oxidoreductase enzymes, including glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), and 6-phosphatase dehydrogenase [61]. Stigmasterol 7 was also reported to possess neuroprotective effects by modulating GABA receptors and suppressing the progression of cell apoptosis via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins cyclin D1, p53, and p38 reduction [62]. On the other hand, Takayama and Fujihara in 2017 investigated whether asperuloside 11 isolated from Eucommia ulmoides could alleviate ROS production in choline-deficient, high fat and fructose-enriched (CDHFF)-diet rats [63]. Thereby, these provide evidence that stigmasterol 7 and asperuloside 11 possess promising constituents for the management of diabetic neuropathy associated with neurological damage due to oxidative stress.
In a computational study of Paederia foetida, Linn revealed five potent compounds (stigmasterol 7, (+)-α-tocopherol 8, γ-Sitosterol 9, (−)-β-sitosterol 10, and asperuloside 11) to possess high affinity against α-glucosidase enzyme, which indicate their effectiveness in inhibiting the enzyme reaction upon saccharide (Figure 5). Interestingly, the major compounds were terpenes, in which their interaction relied on van-der walls interaction compared with hydrogen bonding formed by acarbose, standard drugs (Figure 6). Nevertheless, phytosterol is infamous for its potent anti-diabetic activity.

3.3. Plumbago zeylanica

Quinones are a class of natural constituents that have several beneficial mechanisms in biological systems. The compounds possess antioxidant activity due to their ability to undergo one or two electron reductions by cellular reductases [64]. Among bioactive compounds presented in P. zeylanica, quinones including chitanone 12, zeylanone 13, isozeylanone 14, droserone 22, and plumbagin 20 become important active compounds that might be associated with the plant’s antioxidant activities [41]. As the bio-marker compound of Plumbago species, plumbagin 20 isolated from Plumbago indica was previously reported to possess potent antioxidant activity by reducing the levels of lipid peroxide in diabetic rats [65]. Plumbagin 20 was able to lower lipid peroxides levels, leading to the improvement of antioxidant defense systems [65]. In addition, some phytosterols such as stigmasterol 7, sitosterol 17, and campesterol 15 also appear in P. zeylanica. It has been reported that phytosterol was shown to have the most effective antioxidant activity among the sterols. Despite their potential activity as modest radical scavengers, phytosterols such as β-sitosterol and campesterol reduced membrane oxidation and stabilized lipid membranes [66].
A similar protocol performed on Plumbago zeylanica constitutes derived from literature studies showed compounds with significantly higher affinity than acarbose were Chitanone 12, Zeylanone 13, Isozeylanone 14, Campesterol 15, Plumbagoside D 16, Stigmasterol 7, Sitosterol 17, Heneicosane 18, Plumbagin C 19, 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,6-trihydroxychromen-4-one 20, and Droserone 21 (Figure 7). Interestingly, atropisomer chitanone generates the highest affinity due to its pi–pi interaction with amino acids PE303, TYR158, and ARG315, which is absent in acarbose interaction (Figure 8).

3.4. Nauclea pallida Reinw

Nauclea sp. belongs to the largest family of woody plants, Rubiaceae, which is traditionally used to manage several illnesses including malaria, diarrhea, viral, and non-viral infections [67]. The phytochemical constituents of Nauclea species have been reported since 1953, revealing steroids and saponins as the first identified metabolites [68]. Further, chemical investigations of Nauclea sp. generated a number of alkaloids such as naucledine 22, strictosidine 23, and several derivatives of angustine (Figure 9) [67]. Phenolic compounds including antiarol 24, p-coumaric acid 25, resveratrol 26, and scopoletin 27 were also isolated from the three main Nauclea species (Nauclea diderrichii, Nauclea pobeguinii, and Nauclea latifolia) [69,70,71]. In addition, some pharmacological investigations on Nauclea latifolia species revealed antioxidant and antidiabetic activities. A previous study demonstrated N. latifolia to possess antioxidant activity by reducing CAT and GSH levels in liver tissues as well as inhibiting lipid peroxidation [72,73]. Furthermore, the aqueous leaf extract of N. latifolia was also found to alleviate glucose levels in a diabetic rats model by 45% [74]. However, there was no availability of N. pallida pharmacological evaluation reports and limited information regarding their constituents, which constrained the docking experiment. Nevertheless, a full study of this species is necessary to reveal its antimetabolic disease potency, and anti-diabetic, through in vitro or in vivo evaluations.

3.5. Sauropus androgynus

S. androgynus, which belongs to Phyllanthaceae, is a tropical shrub commonly grown in South Asia and Southeast Asia. In Indonesia, it is known as ‘katuk’ and widely prepared as a clear soup [75]. Apart from its high-value vegetables, S. androgynus has gained broad attention due to its medicinal uses. It contains various classes of plant chemicals with various biological activities, in which research investigations mostly used leaves, followed by roots and seeds. It has led to the isolation and identification of several types of compounds, including lignans, steroids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and nucleosides [75]. Two flavonoids, apigenin 28 and luteolin 29, were identified from S. androgynus (Figure 10) [42,43]. Previous research clarified the neuroprotective effect of apigenin 28 related to its antioxidant mechanism against APP/PS1 in mice models. It increased the brain’s antioxidative capacity, indicated by a decline in the superoxide anion level of the cerebral cortex along with oxidative markers such as GSH and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [76]. Furthermore, the antioxidant capacities of luteolin 29 isolated from Euterpe oleracea Mart. was also reported to be significant, shown by an IC50 value of 6.35 µg/mL, and was measured using a cell-based anti-oxidant protection (CAP-e) assay [77]. The docking protocol revealed that apigenin 28 and luteolin 29 had docking energies of −8.517 and 8.52 kcal/mol, respectively, which are comparable to acarbose.

3.6. Wrightia pubescens

Locally known as ‘Bintaos’, W. pubescens can grow up to 35 m tall and is widely distributed in deciduous lowland thickets and woodland. The ethnopharmacological uses include malaria and eye disease [30,78]. In an earlier study, isolation and identification of W. pubescens yielded several compounds including wrightiadione 30, ursolic acid 31, oleanolic acid 32, squalene 33, and tryptanthrin 34 (Figure 11) [44,45,46]. Interestingly, tryptanthrin 34 has been shown to have antioxidant properties against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced human hepatocyte-derived HepG2 cells through reactive oxygen species inhibition and GSH depletion. Moreover, this compound was also found to increase the activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is associated with tryptanthrin-mediated cytoprotection [79]. Among compounds 30–34, molecular docking protocol resulted in binding energy values of −8.472, −5.556, −6.838, −7.796, and −8.269 kcal/mol, respectively.

3.7. Psophocarpus tetragonolobus

P. tetragonolobus taxonomically belongs to the family of Fabaceae, which is listed as underutilized legumes, and is widely spread around South East Asia. This perennial plant is characterized by its winged pods and is commonly used as a food source which is mostly eaten raw or cooked [80,81]. Moreover, a previous study reported that P. tetragonolobus seeds and root constituents present several biological activities such as α-amylase inhibitor, hemagglutinin activity, and Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor [81]. In the present study, P. tetragonolobus was shown to have promising antioxidant activities in three different methods. However, there was limited availability regarding the constituents of P. tetragonolobus, which constrained the docking assessment as well as their pharmacological evaluation. Therefore, it is necessary to study their potency in order to evaluate their anti-diabetes and antioxidant properties.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Vegetables were collected from the traditional market Besuki Regions (Jember, Banyuwangi, Bondowoso, and Situbondo Districts) in Jawa Timur, Indonesia, and were transported to the Laboratory Drug Utilisation and Discovery Research Group for identification. Voucher samples were stored under the code described in Table 4.

4.2. Extract Preparation

Vegetable extracts were prepared using the ultrasonication and maceration method. The dried samples powder (0.5 g) was homogenized in an extraction vessel and then extracted with ethanol solvent in a ratio of 1:20. Samples were ultrasonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min at a temperature of 35 °C. The sample was left in a macerator vessel for 6 h at room temperature. Extraction was carried out three times with different solvents. The resulting filtrate was evaporated to obtain a concentrated extract

4.3. Antioxidant Determination

4.3.1. 2-2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

Sample solutions (2 GAE/mL, 200 μL) were loaded into 96-well plates (4 replicates) and serially diluted. Another set of wells was loaded with 200 μL of MeOH or vitamin C (1 mM, 50 μL) as negative and positive controls, respectively. DPPH (90 µM, 100 µL) was added to the first three rows of sample solution and mixed thoroughly, and the last row was used to correct for background absorbance (Abs blank). Plates were incubated in the absence of light for 30 min before measuring absorbance at 515 nm using a spectrophotometer UV-Vis microplate reader (U-2900, Hitachi, Japan). Low absorbance indicated high scavenging activity. Radical scavenging activity was determined using the formula below (Equation (1)).
Percentage activity = A0 − A1/A0 × 100%

4.3.2. Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Assay

Pirogalol was used in free radical scavenging evaluation based on an established method [82]. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard (1 mM, 50 µL). Each extract solution (2 µg GAE/mL, 200 μL) was incubated in tris-HCL buffer (pH 8.2, 50 mM, 1.7 mL). After 10 min, pirogalol (10 mM in HCl 10 mM, 100 μL) was added and the absorbance was measured at 320 nm using spectrophotometry UV-Vis. The inhibition percentage of the pirogalol radical by the test solution was determined using the Equation (1) formula.

4.3.3. Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Assay

All vegetable extracts were evaluated for antioxidant potential essentially by established protocol [83]. Briefly, extracts solution (2 µg GAE/mL, 150 µL) and 2-deoxy-D-ribose (28 mM, 50 µL) dissolved in phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4), EDTA (1 mM, 100 µL), FeCl3 (10 mM, 100 µL), H2O2 (11 mM, 50 µL) and ascorbic acid (1 mM, 50 µL) was added into an Eppendorf tube. Before incubating at 37 °C for 1 h, a solution of 2-tiobarbiturat (ATB) (1%, 500 µL) and ATC (2.8%, 500 µL) were loaded into the tube. Afterward, the solution was vortexed and re-incubated at 100 °C for 20 min. The resulting pink coloration solution was then cooled to room temperature followed by absorbance measurements using spectrophotometry UV-Vis at λ 532 nm. Radical scavenging activity was determined using the Equation (1) formula.

4.4. Molecular Docking

Secondary metabolites of vegetable medicinal plants were obtained through extensive searching using the SciFinder® database (https://scifinder.cas.org, accessed on 6 September 2022). Protein 3a4a was obtained from RCSB PDB (https://www.rcsb.org, accessed on 22 September 2022). 2D molecular structures were constructed using ChemDraw v20.0.0.41 (https://perkinelmerinformatics.com, accessed on 22 September 2022). Molecular energy minimization was performed using Avogadro v1.2.0 (https://avogadro.cc, accessed on 22 September 2022) into pdb, whereas molecules pdbqt format were generated using OpenBabel v3.1.1 (https://openbabel.org, accessed on 22 September 2022). Docking parameters were set using AutoDock Tools v1.5.7 (https://autodock.scripps.edu, accessed on 17 October 2022) while docking was performed using autodocking autodock vina v1.2.3 run in quad-core CPU composed of four sets of Intel(R) Core (TM) i3-6006U CPU @ 2.00GHz, 1690 MHz. Data visualization was undergone using BIOVIA Discovery Visualizer v21.1.0.20298 (https://discover.3ds.com, accessed on 17 October 2022).
The docking process was initiated by collecting and collating the secondary metabolite dataset from selected Indonesian vegetables with a potent antioxidant activity using the SciFinder database, which covers molecules isolated from the same species grown across the globes. The molecules were constructed in 2D form prior to 3D generation, which was followed by molecular mechanic calculation to produce the most stable conformation. These molecules (*.pdb) were then converted into *.pdbqt format. The enzyme was also prepared into *.pdbqt format, in which griding parameters for docking were measured and set. Molecular docking was then performed for ligands (secondary metabolites of potent vegetable species and acarbose as the standard). Data logs produced were evaluated into an ordered list revealing hits of molecules with better affinity than the standard drug (acarbose). Molecules with the highest interest were visualized to give an understanding of their interaction with the enzyme.

5. Conclusions

DM sufferers in developed countries have adhered to the treatment given because uncontrolled DM can subsequently cause various complications that involve various organ systems of the human body that can affect the quality of life and economy of the sufferer. Many Indonesian vegetables are prepared also as traditional medicine. The study on selected Indonesian vegetables revealed six species to possess high antioxidant content: I. aquatica, P. foetida, P. zeylanica, N. pallida, S. androgynus, W. pubescens, and P. tetragonolobus. Molecular modeling successfully revealed 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside, stigmasterol, and chitanone were the potent secondary metabolites as anti-diabetic candidates (α-glucosidase inhibitory agent) from I. aquatica, P. foetida, and P. zeylanica, respectively. This left the N. pallida and P. tetragonolobus species to be understudied yet potent sources of antioxidant agents. Nevertheless, this finding supports the idea of developing the selected medicinal vegetables as a source of anti-diabetic agents and could be further developed in the form of conventional natural-based drugs or standardized botanical dosage forms according to the Indonesian government’s strategic development of medicinal plant-based medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.N.; methodology, A.S.N., T.A.S. and S.; validation, A.S.N. and D.M.R.; formal analysis, A.S.N. and D.M.R.; investigation, A.S.N., D.M.R., N.H., S., T.A.S., F.M.C. and I.P.D.; resources, A.S.N., F.M.C., I.P.D., T.A.S. and S.; data curation, D.M.R., T.A.S. and N.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.R., D.R. and A.S.N.; writing—review and editing, A.S.N. and D.M.R.; visualization, A.S.N., D.M.R. and N.H.; supervision, A.S.N. and S.; project administration, D.M.R.; funding acquisition, A.S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the IsDB program at the University of Jember under grant No. RMP-IsDB Project: SP DIPA 023.17.2.6.677562/2022. The APC was funded by MDPI as an invited paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

SciFinder database access was supported by the University of Wollongong.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schleicher, E.; Gerdes, C.; Petersmann, A.; Müller-Wieland, D.; Müller, U.A.; Freckmann, G.; Heinemann, L.; Nauck, M.; Landgraf, R. Definition, Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2022, 130, S1–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B.B.; Stein, C.; Basit, A.; Chan, J.C.; Mbanya, J.C.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 183, 109119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Hasil Utama Riset Kesehatan Dasar; Departemen Kesehatan RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Asmat, U.; Abad, K.; Ismail, K. Diabetes mellitus and oxidative stress—A concise review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2016, 24, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Li, Y.; Wang, D.D.; Ley, S.H.; Vasanti, M.; Howard, A.G.; He, Y.; Hu, F.B. Time trends of dietary and lifestyle factors and their potential impact on diabetes burden in China. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 1685–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Papatheodorou, K.; Banach, M.; Bekiari, E.; Rizzo, M.; Edmonds, M. Complications of diabetes 2017. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 3086167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheng, Y.; Ley, S.H.; Hu, F.B. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ćorković, I.; Gašo-Sokač, D.; Pichler, A.; Šimunović, J.; Kopjar, M. Dietary Polyphenols as Natural Inhibitors of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase. Life 2022, 12, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meneses, M.J.; Silva, B.M.; Sousa, M.; Sa, R.; Oliveira, P.F.; Alves, M.G. Antidiabetic drugs: Mechanisms of action and potential outcomes on cellular metabolism. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 3606–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaudhury, A.; Duvoor, C.; Reddy Dendi, V.S.; Kraleti, S.; Chada, A.; Ravilla, R.; Marco, A.; Shekhawat, N.S.; Montales, M.T.; Kuriakose, K.; et al. Clinical review of antidiabetic drugs: Implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Saeed, F.; Sultan, M.T.; Riaz, A.; Ahmed, S.; Bigiu, N.; Amarowicz, R.; Manea, R. Bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) fruit bioactives charantin and vicine potential for diabetes prophylaxis and treatment. Plants 2021, 10, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martín, M.Á.; Ramos, S. Dietary flavonoids and insulin signaling in diabetes and obesity. Cells 2021, 10, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rahimi-Madiseh, M.; Malekpour-Tehrani, A.; Bahmani, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. The research and development on the antioxidants in prevention of diabetic complications. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 9, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Preshaw, P.M.; Alba, A.L.; Herrera, D.; Jepsen, S.; Konstantinidis, A.; Makrilakis, K.; Taylor, R. Periodontitis and diabetes: A two-way relationship. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chee, B.; Park, B.; Bartold, P.M. Periodontitis and type II diabetes: A two-way relationship. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2013, 11, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, W. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wallace, T.C.; Bailey, R.L.; Blumberg, J.B.; Burton-Freeman, B.; Chen, C.O.; Crowe-White, K.M.; Drewnowski, A.; Hooshmand, S.; Johnson, E.; Lewis, R.; et al. Fruits, vegetables, and health: A comprehensive narrative, umbrella review of the science and recommendations for enhanced public policy to improve intake. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2174–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hartanti, D.; Budipramana, K. Traditional antidiabetic plants from Indonesia. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2020, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ri, K.K. Fitofarmaka Berpotensi Jadi Produk Farmasi Utama Dalam Negeri. Available online: https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/umum/20211108/5038813/fitofarmaka-berpotensi-jadi-produk-farmasi-utama-dalam-negeri/ (accessed on 24 January 2022).
  20. Hutapea, J.R.; Djumidi, S. Inventaris Tanaman Obat Indonesia I Jilid 2; Departemen Kesehatan dan Kesejahteraan Sosial RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2001; p. 355. [Google Scholar]
  21. Djumidi, S. Inventaris Tanaman Obat Indonesia IV; Departemen Kesehatan RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mustofa, F.I.; Rahmawati, N. Studi etnofarmakologi tumbuhan obat yang digunakan oleh penyehat tradisional untuk mengatasi diare di Sulawesi Selatan. J. Tumbuh. Obat Indones. 2018, 11, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Permatasari, D.; Diniatik, D.; Hartanti, D. Studi Etnofarmakologi Obat Tradisional Sebagai Anti Diare Di Kecamatan Baturaden Kabupaten Banyumas. Pharm. J. Farm. Indones. 2011, 8, 44–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hutapea, J.R. Inventaris Tanaman Obat Indonesia I Jilid I; Departemen Kesehatan dan Kesejahteraan Sosial RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hutapea, J.R. Inventaris Tanaman Obat Indonesia II; Departemen Kesehatan RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rizki, R.; Chairunnisak, C.; Alfina, R.; Darlis, O.; Rasdanelwati, R. Potential of Medicinal Plants in the Asteraceae Family Found in Harau Lima Puluh Kota Regency. Sainstek J. Sains Teknol. 2021, 13, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ito, M.F. Kajian Etnofarmakologi Penggunaan Tanaman Obat Oleh Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Soa Kabupaten Ngada; Poltekkes Kemenkes: Kupang, Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hutapea, J.R. Inventaris Tanaman obat Indonesia III; Departemen Kesehatan RI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kodir, R.A.; Moektiwardoyo, M.; Iskandar, Y. Etnofarmasi dan ulasan bioprospektif tumbuhan obat liar dalam pengobatan tradisional kampung adat cikondang, kecamatan pangalengan, kabupaten bandung, jawa barat. Farmaka 2017, 15, 26–44. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eisai Indonesia. Herb Index Indonesia; Eisai Indonesia: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qasrin, U.; Setiawan, A.; Yulianty, Y.; Bintoro, A. Studi Etnobotani Tumbuhan Berkhasiat Obat yang Dimanfaatkan Masyarakat Suku Melayu Kabupaten Lingga Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. J. Belantara 2020, 3, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gunarti, N.S. Studi Etnobotani Tumbuhan Obat di Desa Kutalanggeng dan Kutamaneuh Kecamatan Tegalwaru Kabupaten Karawang Jawa Barat. Maj. Farmasetika 2021, 6, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hefny Gad, M.; Tuenter, E.; El-Sawi, N.; Younes, S.; El-Ghadban, E.M.; Demeyer, K.; Pieters, L.; Vander Heyden, Y.; Mangelings, D. Identification of some bioactive metabolites in a fractionated methanol extract from Ipomoea aquatica (aerial parts) through TLC, HPLC, UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and LC-SPE-NMR fingerprints analyses. Phytochem. Anal. 2018, 29, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lawal, U.; Leong, S.W.; Shaari, K.; Ismail, I.S.; Khatib, A.; Abas, F. α-glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of Different Ipomoea aquatica cultivars and LC–MS/MS profiling of the active cultivar. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lawal, U.; Mediani, A.; Maulidiani, H.; Shaari, K.; Ismail, I.S.; Khatib, A.; Abas, F. Metabolite profiling of Ipomoea aquatica at different growth stages in correlation to the antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities elucidated by 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prasad, K.N.; Divakar, S.; Shivamurthy, G.R.; Aradhya, S.M. Isolation of a free radical-scavenging antioxidant from water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, M.; Ying, L.; Li, S.; Fu, X.; Du, G. Progress on research and development of Paederia scandens as a natural medicine. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 12, 158–167. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Biologically active compounds from Plumbago zeylanica. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014, 50, 905–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cong, H.J.; Zhang, S.W.; Shen, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, Y.J.; Wang, W.Q.; Leng, Y.; Xuan, L.-J. Guanidine alkaloids from Plumbago zeylanica. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vanitha, V.; Vijayakumar, S.; Nilavukkarasi, M.; Punitha, V.; Vidhya, E.; Praseetha, P. Heneicosane—A novel microbicidal bioactive alkane identified from Plumbago zeylanica L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shukla, B.; Saxena, S.; Usmani, S.; Kushwaha, P. Phytochemistry and pharmacological studies of Plumbago zeylanica L.: A medicinal plant review. Clin. Phytoscience 2021, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Andarwulan, N.; Batari, R.; Sandrasari, D.A.; Bolling, B.; Wijaya, H. Flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of vegetables from Indonesia. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 1231–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Andarwulan, N.; Kurniasih, D.; Apriady, R.A.; Rahmat, H.; Roto, A.V.; Bolling, B.W. Polyphenols, carotenoids, and ascorbic acid in underutilized medicinal vegetables. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Traxler, F.; Iamprasertkun, N.; Tschigg, A.M.; Vajrodaya, S.; Valant-Vetschera, K.; Brecker, L.; Schinnerl, J. Specialized plant metabolites from indolic and polyphenolic biosynthetic pathways in Wrightia religiosa (Teijsm. & Binn.) Benth. and Wrightia pubescens R. Br. (Apocynaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 242–248. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ragasa, C.Y.; Ng, V.; de Los Reyes, M.M.; Mandia, E.H.; Shen, C.C. An isoflavone from Wrightia pubescens. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2015, 7, 353–355. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ragasa, C.Y.; Ng, V.A.S.; Mariquit, M.; Mandia, E.H.; Shen, C.-C. Chemical constituents of Wrightia pubescens (R. Br.). Delta 2014, 18, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yaribeygi, H.; Sathyapalan, T.; Atkin, S.L.; Sahebkar, A. Molecular mechanisms linking oxidative stress and diabetes mellitus. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 8609213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Syabana, M.A.; Yuliana, N.D.; Batubara, I.; Fardiaz, D. Antidiabetic activity screening and nmr profile of vegetable and spices commonly consumed in Indonesia. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kashihara, N.; Haruna, V.K.; Kondeti, Y.S.; Kanwar, Y. Oxidative stress in diabetic nephropathy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 4256–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kowluru, R.A.; Chan, P.S. Oxidative stress and diabetic retinopathy. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2007, 2007, 043603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Pang, L.; Lian, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Cai, Y.; Ma, H.; Yu, X. Understanding diabetic neuropathy: Focus on oxidative stress. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 9524635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Srivastava, G.P.; Yadav, N.; Yadav, B.N.; Yadav, R.K.; Yadav, D.K. Pan-interactomics and its applications. In Pan-Genomics: Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 397–435. [Google Scholar]
  53. Elfrida, E.; Tarigan, N.S.; Suwardi, A.B. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by community in Jambur Labu Village, East Aceh, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2021, 22, 2893–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hefny Gad, M.; Demeyer, K.; Vander Heyden, Y.; Mangelings, D. Cytotoxic, Antioxidant, and Antidiabetic Activities versus UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS Chemical-Profile Analysis of Ipomoea aquatica Fractions. Planta Med. 2021, 87, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vuolo, M.M.; Lima, V.S.; Junior, M.R.M. Phenolic compounds: Structure, classification, and antioxidant power. In Bioactive Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 33–50. [Google Scholar]
  56. Choi, J.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, S.Z.; Kwon, T.O.; Jeong, S.I.; Jang, S.I. Antioxidant effect of astragalin isolated from the leaves of Morus alba L. against free radical-induced oxidative hemolysis of human red blood cells. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2013, 36, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, P.; Yin, Y.; Pan, G.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Q. Effect of astragalin on paraoxon-induced vascular endothelium dysfunction. Plant Dis. Pests 2011, 2, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hung, T.M.; Na, M.; Thuong, P.T.; Su, N.D.; Sok, D.; Song, K.S.; Seong, Y.H.; Bae, K. Antioxidant activity of caffeoyl quinic acid derivatives from the roots of Dipsacus asper Wall. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ding, S.; Jiang, H.; Fang, J. Regulation of Immune Function by Polyphenols. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 1264074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Han, T.; Zheng, C.; Qin, L. A phytochemical, pharmacological and clinical profile of Paederia foetida and P. scandens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Osuntokun, O.T.; Oluduro, A.; Idowu, T.; Omotuyi, A. Assessment of nephrotoxicity, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of epigallocatechin, epicatechin and stigmasterol phytosterol (synergy) derived from ethyl acetate stem bark extract of Spondias mombin on Wistar rats using molecular method of analysis. J. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 1, 103. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pattarachotanant, N.; Prasansuklab, A.; Tencomnao, T. Momordica charantia L. Extract Protects Hippocampal Neuronal Cells against PAHs-Induced Neurotoxicity: Possible Active Constituents Include Stigmasterol and Vitamin, E. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Takayama, F.; Fujihara, Y. How does Eucommia leaf extract prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation induced by high-fat diets at the aortic tunica media? Hypertens. Res. 2017, 40, 541–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. El-Najjar, N.; Gali-Muhtasib, H.; Ketola, R.A.; Vuorela, P.; Urtti, A.; Vuorela, H. The chemical and biological activities of quinones: Overview and implications in analytical detection. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shao, Y.; Dang, M.; Lin, Y.; Xue, F. Evaluation of wound healing activity of plumbagin in diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2019, 231, 116422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yoshida, Y.; Niki, E. Antioxidant effects of phytosterol and its components. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2003, 49, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Haudecoeur, R.; Peuchmaur, M.; Pérès, B.; Rome, M.; Taïwe, G.S.; Boumendjel, A.; Boucherle, B. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of African Nauclea species: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 212, 106–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. King, F.; Jurd, L. 239. The Chemistry of extractives from hardwoods. Part XII. The cyclitols and steroids of opepe (Sarcocephalus diderrichii). J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 1192–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abreu, P.; Pereira, A. New indole alkaloids from Sarcocephalus latifolius. Nat. Prod. Lett. 2001, 15, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kuete, V.; Sandjo, L.P.; Mbaveng, A.T.; Seukep, J.A.; Ngadjui, B.T.; Efferth, T. Cytotoxicity of selected Cameroonian medicinal plants and Nauclea pobeguinii towards multi-factorial drug-resistant cancer cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. McLean, S.; Murray, D. The constituents of Nauclea diderrichii. Part IV. Miscellaneous substances; biogenetic considerations. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50, 1496–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Awah, F.M.; Uzoegwu, P.N.; Ifeonu, P.; Oyugi, J.O.; Rutherford, J.; Yao, X.; Fehrmann, F.; Fowke, K.R.; Eze, M.O. Free radical scavenging activity, phenolic contents and cytotoxicity of selected Nigerian medicinal plants. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Iwueke, A.; Nwodo, O.; Ojiako, O.; Okwu, G.; Nwogu, L.; Igwe, C. Modification of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress in hepatocytes of diabetic rats treated with root extract of Sarcocephalus latifolius and Daniella oliveri. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4, 3578–3584. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gidado, A.; Ameh, D.; Atawodi, S. Effect of Nauclea latifolia leaves aqueous extracts on blood glucose levels of normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 91–93. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, B.D.; Cheng, J.X.; Zhang, C.F.; Bai, Y.D.; Liu, W.Y.; Li, W.; Koike, K.; Akihisa, T.; Feng, F.; Zhang, J.; et al. Sauropus androgynus L. Merr.-A phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 257, 112778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao, L.; Wang, J.L.; Liu, R.; Li, X.X.; Li, J.F.; Zhang, L. Neuroprotective, anti-amyloidogenic and neurotrophic effects of apigenin in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Molecules 2013, 18, 9949–9965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Kang, J.; Li, Z.; Wu, T.; Jensen, G.S.; Schauss, A.G.; Wu, X. Anti-oxidant capacities of flavonoid compounds isolated from acai pulp (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Food Chem. 2010, 122, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Taek, M.M.; Ew, B.P.; Agil, M. Ethnomedicinal Plants Used for the Treatment of Malaria in Malaka, West Timor. J. Young Pharm. 2018, 10, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Moon, S.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, H.Y.; Cho, I.J.; Kim, S.C.; Kim, Y.W. Tryptanthrin protects hepatocytes against oxidative stress via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/NF-E2-related factor 2 pathway. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 37, 1633–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fatihah, H.N.; Maxted, N.; Arce, L.R. Cladistic analysis of Psophocarpus Neck. ex DC.(Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) based on morphological characters. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 83, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bassal, H.; Merah, O.; Ali, A.M.; Hijazi, A.; El Omar, F. Psophocarpus tetragonolobus: An Underused Species with Multiple Potential Uses. Plants 2020, 9, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tang, X.; He, Z.; Dai, Y.; Xiong, Y.L.; Xie, M.; Chen, J. Peptide fractionation and free radical scavenging activity of zein hydrolysate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.; Aruoma, O.I. The deoxyribose method: A simple “test-tube” assay for determination of rate constants for reactions of hydroxyl radicals. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 165, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Indonesian government’s strategy in developing modern medicine sourced from Indonesian medicinal plants.
Figure 1. Indonesian government’s strategy in developing modern medicine sourced from Indonesian medicinal plants.
Ddc 02 00002 g001
Figure 2. Vegetables are commonly used and traded by the indigenous people of Indonesia in the traditional market (Amaranthus spinosus L. (1), Artocarpus Altilis (Park.) FSB. (2), Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (3), Cajanus cajan Millspaugh (4), Carica papaya L. (5), Clitoria ternatea L. (6), Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S.Moore (7), Diplazium esculentum Swartz. (8), Etlingera elatior (Jack) R.M.Sm. (9), Ipomoea aquatica Forssk. (10), Limnocharis flava (L.) Buch (11), Luffa acutangular (L.) Roxb. (12), Marsilea minuta L. (13), Moringa oleifera L. (14), Musa paradisiaca L. (15), Nasturtium officinale W.T. Aiton (16), Nauclea pallida Reinw (17), Nothopanax scutellarium Merr. (18), Paederia foetida L. (19), Pluchea indica L. (20), Plumbago zeylanica L. (21), Portulaca oleracea L. (22), Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C. (23), Sauropus Androgynus (L.) Merr. (24), Sechium Edule (Jacq.) Sw. (25), Sesbania grandiflora Pers. (26), Tagetes erecta L. (27), Vigna cylindrica (L.) Walp. (28), Wrightia pubescens R.Br. (29)).
Figure 2. Vegetables are commonly used and traded by the indigenous people of Indonesia in the traditional market (Amaranthus spinosus L. (1), Artocarpus Altilis (Park.) FSB. (2), Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (3), Cajanus cajan Millspaugh (4), Carica papaya L. (5), Clitoria ternatea L. (6), Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S.Moore (7), Diplazium esculentum Swartz. (8), Etlingera elatior (Jack) R.M.Sm. (9), Ipomoea aquatica Forssk. (10), Limnocharis flava (L.) Buch (11), Luffa acutangular (L.) Roxb. (12), Marsilea minuta L. (13), Moringa oleifera L. (14), Musa paradisiaca L. (15), Nasturtium officinale W.T. Aiton (16), Nauclea pallida Reinw (17), Nothopanax scutellarium Merr. (18), Paederia foetida L. (19), Pluchea indica L. (20), Plumbago zeylanica L. (21), Portulaca oleracea L. (22), Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C. (23), Sauropus Androgynus (L.) Merr. (24), Sechium Edule (Jacq.) Sw. (25), Sesbania grandiflora Pers. (26), Tagetes erecta L. (27), Vigna cylindrica (L.) Walp. (28), Wrightia pubescens R.Br. (29)).
Ddc 02 00002 g002
Figure 3. Secondary metabolites of Ipomoea aquatica with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Figure 3. Secondary metabolites of Ipomoea aquatica with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Ddc 02 00002 g003
Figure 4. Molecular interaction between (top) 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 1 and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a) and (bottom) acarbose and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase.
Figure 4. Molecular interaction between (top) 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 1 and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a) and (bottom) acarbose and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase.
Ddc 02 00002 g004aDdc 02 00002 g004b
Figure 5. Secondary metabolites of Paederia foetida with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Figure 5. Secondary metabolites of Paederia foetida with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Ddc 02 00002 g005
Figure 6. Molecular interaction between stigmasterol and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Figure 6. Molecular interaction between stigmasterol and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Ddc 02 00002 g006
Figure 7. Secondary metabolites of Plumbago zeylanica with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Figure 7. Secondary metabolites of Plumbago zeylanica with high affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Ddc 02 00002 g007
Figure 8. Molecular interaction between chitanone and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Figure 8. Molecular interaction between chitanone and amino acids residues of α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Ddc 02 00002 g008
Figure 9. Several secondary metabolites of Nauclea sp.
Figure 9. Several secondary metabolites of Nauclea sp.
Ddc 02 00002 g009
Figure 10. Secondary metabolites of S. androgynus.
Figure 10. Secondary metabolites of S. androgynus.
Ddc 02 00002 g010
Figure 11. Secondary metabolites of W. pubescens.
Figure 11. Secondary metabolites of W. pubescens.
Ddc 02 00002 g011
Table 1. Indonesian vegetable species commonly used by the indigenous people of Indonesia.
Table 1. Indonesian vegetable species commonly used by the indigenous people of Indonesia.
NoLocal NamePart UsedSpecies NameFamilyDistribution in IndonesiaEthnopharmacology IndicationRef.
1Bayam duriWhole plant (young)Amaranthus spinosus L.AmaranthaceaeSumatra, Jawa, Madura, Bali, Sulawesi, Maluku, Halmahera, TidoreBlister, asthma, fever[20]
2KluwihYoung fruitArtocarpus Altilis (Park.) FSB.MoraceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Bali, Nusa Tenggara, Timor, Sulawesi, Selayar, Maluku, Seram, HalmaheraToothache, skin infection[21]
3NangkaYoung fruitArtocarpus heterophyllus Lam. MoraceaeSulawesi, JawaDiarrhea[22,23]
4GudeSeedsCajanus cajan MillspaughLeguminosaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Bali, Nusa Tenggara, Timor, Sulawesi, Maluku, Halmahera, Ternate, TidoreScabies, cough, blood cleansing[20]
5PepayaFlowerCarica papaya L.caricaceaeSumatera, Kalimantan, Nusa Tenggara, Jawa, Sulawesi, maluku, PapuaMalaria, anthelmintic, stomachache,[24]
6TelangFlowerClitoria ternatea L.PapilonaceaeSumatra, Jawa, Sulawesi, Maluku, Halmahera, TernateBlister, eye irritation[25]
7SintrongWhole plant (young)Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S.MooreAsteraceaeSumatera, JawaStomachache, headache, blister[26,27]
8Pakis Whole plant (young)Diplazium esculentum Swartz.PolypodiaceaeSumatra, Jawa, Bali, Sulawesi, Maluku, AmbonRub[28]
9KecombrangFlowerEtlingera elatior (Jack) R.M.Sm.ZingiberaceaeJawaVitality[29]
10KangkungWhole plant (young)Ipomoea aquatica Forssk.ConvolvulaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Nusa Tenggara, Sulawesi, Gorontalo, Maluku, Halmahera, Tidore, BuruSedative agent[20]
11Genjer Whole plant (young)Limnocharis flava (L.) BuchButomaceaeSumatera, Jawa, MaduraFood[30]
12GambasYoung FruitLuffa acutangular (L.) Roxb.CucurbitaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Maluku, TernateFever, nausea, stomachache, toothache[29]
13SemanggiWhole plant (young)Marsilea minuta L.MarsilaceaeJawadiuretic agents[28]
14KelorYoung Leaves
Fruit, seeds
Moringa oleifera L.MoringaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Bali, Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, Buru, Ternate, TidoreGum bleeding, period, headache, asthma, rheumatism, anti-emetic, spasm[20]
15PisangStemMusa paradisiaca L. MusaceaeSumatera, Jawa, AmbonTonsil and gastro inflammation, anemia, trachoma inflammation, diarrhea, fever, food poisoning[30]
16Selada AirWhole plant (young)Nasturtium officinale W.T. Aiton SumateraExcema [31]
17KolpoYoung LeavesNauclea pallida ReinwRubiaceaeJawaDiuretic[30]
18MangkokanYoung LeavesNothopanax scutellarium Merr.AraliaceaeJawa, Sulawesi, Mena, Maluku, Ambon, Roti, Halmahera, TernateHari tonic, anti-inflammation (edema), diuretic agents[20]
19SembukanLeavesPaederia foetida L.RubiaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Maluku, TernateSore[32]
20BeluntasYoung LeavesPluchea indica L.AsteraceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Sulawesi, Nusa, Tenggara TimorFever, cough, body odor[20]
21KarekaYoung LeavesPlumbago zeylanica L.PlumbaginaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Bali, TimorRheumatism, headache[24]
22KrokotWhole plant (young)Portulaca oleracea L.PortulaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Maluku, TernateDiarrhea, fever, stomachache[20]
23KecipirFruit and seedsPsophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C.FabaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Bali, Maluku, TernateEar inflammation[20]
24Katuk Young LeavesSauropus Androgynus (L.) Merr.EuphorbiaceaeSumatera, Jawa, MaduraBreas milk stimulant, acne, fever, blister, eczema[20]
25Labu SiamFruit (young)Sechium Edule (Jacq.) Sw.CucurbitaceaeSumatera, Jawa, MaduraFood
26TuriFlowerSesbania grandiflora Pers.LeguminosaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Bali, Sulawesi, Nusa tenggara, Timor, Ternate, TidoreGastro-inflammation, mouth blister, scabies[20]
27KenikirYoung leavesTagetes erecta L.CompositaeJawaInsect repellant[20]
28Kacang panjangYoung FruitVigna cylindrica (L.) Walp.FabaceaeJawaDiuretic[28]
29BintaosYoung LeavesWrightia pubescens R.Br.ApocynaceaeSumatera, Jawa, Madura, Nusa Tenggara, Bali, Timor Eye irritation[30]
Table 2. Radical scavenging activity of commonly used Indonesian vegetables.
Table 2. Radical scavenging activity of commonly used Indonesian vegetables.
NoSamplePlant PartsInhibition Percentage (%)
DPPHSOHydroxyl
1Carica papayaFlos47.2 ± 0.260.3 ± 1.059.3 ± 0.1
2Clitoria ternateaFlos87.5 ± 0.253.7 ± 1.873.2 ± 0.1
3Etlingera elatiorFlos66.2 ± 0.293.6 ± 1.280.4 ± 0.1
4Ipomoea aquaticaAll parts92.6 ± 0.297.6 ± 1.080.2 ± 0.1
5Limnocharis FlavaAll parts27.7 ± 0.383.4 ± 1.079.2 ± 0.1
6Luffa acutangularFructus12.6 ± 0.272.7 ± 1.080.2 ± 0.1
7Marsilea minutaAll parts72.2 ± 0.174.5 ± 2.786.0 ± 0.1
8Moringa OleiferaAll parts5.3 ± 0.466.8 ± 2.178.6 ± 0.2
9Moringa OleiferaFlos24.4 ± 0.295.1 ± 0.873.9 ± 0.1
10Nasturtium officinaleAll parts36.3 ± 0.288.1 ± 0.886.3 ± 0.1
11Nauclea pallida Reinw.All parts89.1 ± 0.172.3 ± 2.286.1 ± 0.1
12Nothopanax scutellariumAll parts1.1 ± 0.279.7 ± 0.684.2 ± 0.1
13Paederia foetidaAll parts90.3 ± 0.293.5 ± 2.185.7 ± 0.1
14Pluchea indicaAll parts86.4 ± 0.295.3 ± 2.157.9 ± 0.1
15Plumbago zeylanicaAll parts90.0 ± 0.684.6 ± 2.189.2 ± 0.1
16Psophocarpus tetragonolobusFructus83.8 ± 0.287.5 ± 1.890.0 ± 0.1
17Sauropus AndrogynusAll parts20.3 ± 0.234.5 ± 1.991.1 ± 0.1
18Vigna cylindricaAll parts22.0 ± 0.282.2 ± 1.882.9 ± 0.1
19Wrightia pubescensAll parts72.8 ± 0.196.5 ± 0.590.0 ± 0.1
20Diplazium esculentumAll parts25.0 ± 0.277.5 ± 2.190.2 ± 0.1
21Vitamin C (standard)-88.8 ± 0.179.9 ± 2.638.1 ± 0.5
Table 3. Secondary metabolites of the same species reported from different origins across the globe and their affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Table 3. Secondary metabolites of the same species reported from different origins across the globe and their affinity against α-glucosidase (3a4a).
Name of Structure Affinity (kcal/mol)
Ipomoea aquatica
7-O-β-D-Glucopyranosyl-dihydroquercetin-3-O-α-D-glucopyranoside−11.98
3,5-di-O-Caffeolyquinic acid−10.75
Luteolin-7-glucoside−10.31
4,5-Di-O-caffeolyquinic acid−9.67
Quercetin-3,7-di-O-glucoside−9.45
Astragalin−9.06
Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucoside−8.71
Rutin−8.34
Isoquercetin−8.24
Dihydroxybenzoic acid di-pentoside−8.23
Nicotiflorin−7.52
Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside−7.40
Nomilinic acid glucoside−6.97
Quercetin-3-O-sophoroside−6.93
Dihydroxybenzoic acid pentoside−6.65
Paederia foetida
Stigmasterol−10.18
(+)-α-Tocopherol−9.94
γ-Sitosterol−9.81
(−)-β-Sitosterol−9.53
Asperuloside−9.20
Benzbromarone−8.88
Kaempferol 3-O -rutinoside−8.68
Quercetin 3-glucoside−8.63
Caffeic acid 4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside−8.50
Deacetylasperuloside−8.48
Scandoside−8.44
2-Anthraquinonecarboxylic acid−8.39
Rutin−8.35
2-Hydroxy-3-methylanthraquinone−8.12
Anthra [1,2-d]-1,3-dioxole-6,11-dione−8.10
Rubiadin−8.09
2-(Hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone−8.00
Geniposide−7.99
3-Hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone−7.98
2-Hydroxy-1,3,4-trimethoxy-9,10-anthracenedione−7.96
1,4-Dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-9,10-anthracenedione−7.88
N-(4-Methylphenyl) benzenepropanamide−7.86
6α-Hydroxygeniposide−7.80
1-Hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-9,10-anthracenedione−7.79
2-(Ethoxymethyl)-3-hydroxy-1-methoxy-9,10-anthracenedione−7.71
1,3-Dihydroxy-2-methoxyanthraquinone−7.69
Alizarin−7.69
Capsaicin−7.38
Friedelin−7.01
Glutathione−6.82
β-Carotene−6.64
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol−6.58
Fraxidin−6.48
Ethyl (E)-4-methoxycinnamate−6.45
(±)-Pentobarbital−6.39
Plumbago zeylanica L.
Chitanone−12.19
Zeylanone −10.38
Isozeylanone−10.38
Campesterol −9.70
Plumbagoside D−9.70
Stigmasterol −9.50
Sitosterol −9.42
Heneicosane−9.41
Plumbagin C−9.39
2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,6-trihydroxychromen-4-one−9.11
Droserone −9.05
2-(2,4-Dihydroxy-phenyl)-3,6,8-trihydroxy-chromen-4-one−8.54
Plumbagoside C−8.13
Plumbagoside B−7.95
3-(2,5-Dimethylphenyl)-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-propenone−7.75
Plumbagin F−7.68
Plumbagoside A−7.51
Plumbagin D−7.26
Plumbagin B−7.16
Plumbagin G−7.16
Plumbagin E−7.11
2,5-Dimethyl-7-hydroxychromone−6.98
Plumbagic acid −6.84
Isoshinanolone −6.75
Indole-3-carboxaldehyde−5.83
Plumbagin A−5.78
Vanilic acid −5.78
trans-cinnamic acid−5.76
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde−5.03
Acarbose (standard drug)−7.80
Table 4. Indonesian vegetables sample.
Table 4. Indonesian vegetables sample.
NoSpeciesLocal NameVoucher Code
1Carica papayaBunga papayaCP
2Clitoria ternatea L.Bunga telangCT
3Etlingera elatiorBunga kecombrangEE
4Ipomoea aquaticaKangkungIA
5Limnocharis FlavaGenjerLF
6Luffa acutangularBuah gambasLA
7Marsilea minuta L.SemanggiMM
8Moringa OleiferaDaun kelorMO
9Nasturtium officinaleSelada airNO
10Nauclea pallida Reinw.Daun kolpoNP
11Nothopanax scutellarium Merr.Daun mangkokanNS
12Paederia foetida LinnDaun sembukanPF
13Pluchea indicaDaun beluntasPI
14Plumbago zeylanica L.Daun encokPZ
15Psophocarpus tetragonolobusKecipirPT
16Sauropus androgynusDaun katukSA
17Vigna cylindrica (L.) SkeelsKacang panjangVC
18Wrightia pubescens R.BrDaun dan tangkai BintaosWP
19Diplazium esculentumPakisDE
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rani, D.M.; Hanafi, N.; Sudarko; Rachmawati, D.; Siswoyo, T.A.; Christianty, F.M.; Dewi, I.P.; Nugraha, A.S. Indonesian Vegetables: Searching for Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Therapeutic Agents. Drugs Drug Candidates 2023, 2, 14-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc2010002

AMA Style

Rani DM, Hanafi N, Sudarko, Rachmawati D, Siswoyo TA, Christianty FM, Dewi IP, Nugraha AS. Indonesian Vegetables: Searching for Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Therapeutic Agents. Drugs and Drug Candidates. 2023; 2(1):14-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc2010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rani, Dinar Mutia, Nur Hanafi, Sudarko, Dessy Rachmawati, Tri Agus Siswoyo, Fransiska Maria Christianty, Ika Puspita Dewi, and Ari Satia Nugraha. 2023. "Indonesian Vegetables: Searching for Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Therapeutic Agents" Drugs and Drug Candidates 2, no. 1: 14-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc2010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop