Next Article in Journal
Association between Anthropometric Measurements and Vascular Disease: A Cross Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Pulse Pressure Independent of Mean Arterial Pressure Is Associated with Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in Normotensive Elders: Findings from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III 1999–2014
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship of Postoperative Serum Neuro-Specific Enolase Levels with Postoperative Delirium Occurring after Microvascular Depression Surgery in Older Patients

1
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing 100070, China
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Liaocheng Brain Hospital, Liaocheng People’s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
3
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Vasc. Dis. 2023, 2(1), 1-12; https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd2010001
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neurovascular Diseases)

Abstract

:
There is a high incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) following microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. Neuronal survival, differentiation, and neurite regeneration are regulated by neuro-specific enolase (NSE). Therefore, we investigated and assessed whether circulating NSE levels are related to POD after MVD surgery. We recruited a total of 209 patients and 209 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted, and serum NSE levels were measured in the serum of patients before and after surgery, as well as the serum of controls. Patients were categorized according to the presence of POD. Postoperative patient serum levels of NSE were significantly higher compared to preoperative levels. Additionally, postoperative serum NSE levels were remarkably higher in POD patients than non-POD patients. In addition, there was no significant correlation between NSE levels and the type and severity of postoperative delirium. Age (OR = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.040–1.277, p = 0.006), the levels of serum NSE (OR = 1.326, 95% CI = 1.177–1.494, p < 0.001), and the levels of serum S100β (OR = 1.006, 95% CI = 1.000–1.012, p = 0.048) were the three independent variables for predicting POD. A significant correlation existed between serum S100β levels and serum NSE levels (t = 2.690, p = 0.008). In terms of area under the precision–recall curve, the discriminatory ability of serum NSE levels (AUC = 0.876, 95% CI = 0.829–0.924, p < 0.0001) was close to that of the serum S100β level (AUC = 0.879, 95% CI = 0.825–0.933, p < 0.0001) and significantly higher than that of age (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.755–0.871, p < 0.0001). Combining all three features produced a dramatic improvement over individual effects. The NSE level in serum was a stronger indicator of the likelihood of POD after MVD surgery in the older population. The clinical determination of this factor might be useful for distinguishing older patients at risk of POD after MVD surgery on the basis of their clinical findings.

1. Introduction

During a postoperative recovery period, older patients may experience delirium, which is an acute state in cognition characterized by inattention, frequent shifts in consciousness levels, and/or disordered thinking [1,2,3]. The reported incidence rates range from 4% to 7% in patients who have undergone urologic surgery to nearly 35% to 65% in patients who have undergone hip fracture surgery, while they are as high as 32.4% among older patients in major head and neck surgery [3,4,5,6,7]. It is estimated that there are multiple risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) among non-neurosurgical patients, whereas neurosurgical patients are frequently exposed to additional risks due to neurosurgical pathophysiology and neurosurgery-related damage to the brain, which might also be a contributing factor [8]. The impact of POD on neurological function has not yet been studied extensively in neurosurgery. For patients with primary cranial nerve disease, including trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and various forms of neurovascular compression, microvascular decompression (MVD) has been scientifically proven to be the most effective treatment [9]. Specifically, 14.9–27.3% of patients with MVD experience POD after surgery [10]. While once thought to be transient and self-limiting, patients with POD have been associated with longer hospital stays, higher care costs, an increase in morbidity and mortality, and persistent perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PNDs) [11,12,13,14]. Identifying patients at high risk of POD is the best way to prevent it. Furthermore, early detection and effective intervention result in an excellent prognosis. Hence, it is essential to understand the risk factors for POD and make early predictions.
It is known that neuro-specific enolase (NSE) is an isoenzyme of enolase that is cell-specific. As a marker, it is capable of identifying not only all neuron types, but also all perineuronal cells or neuroendocrine cells [15]. There is evidence that it is a useful tool for measuring brain damage quantitatively and/or improving the outcome evaluation and diagnosis in seizures, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and comatose patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for traumatic brain injury and cardiac arrest [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. NSE has been shown to control neuronal survival, differentiation, and neurite regeneration by activating the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways [23,24]. At present, circulating NSE levels are not examined in patients suffering from postoperative depression after neurosurgery. S100β is one of the members of the S100 gene group, which are proteins that can bind calcium. Previous studies have widely shown that higher S100β levels were found in patients with delirium than in patients without delirium, and S100β was proven to be the strongest independent marker in the pathogenesis of delirium [25,26,27]. Consequently, in this study, we recruited an older group of patients in need of MVD surgery, measured their preoperative and postoperative serum S100β levels, serum NSE levels, and relevant serum biochemical indicators, and further estimated the relationship between the development of POD and serum NSE levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Setting, and Participants

An observational study was conducted at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University. The recruitment period was from June 2020 to July 2021. Older (defined as age ≥65 years) healthy individuals were recruited as the controls, whereas older sufferers who received treatment for a hemifacial spasm (HFS) or trigeminal neuralgia (TN) were recruited as the cases. All patients included in this study had to meet the following criteria: (1) primary HFS or TN; (2) preoperative Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥24; (3) no prior specific pretreatment, such as Botox injection or radiofrequency ablation; (4) no previous psychiatric disorder such as delirium, dementia, or depressive illness; (5) no history of neurological disorders, such as trauma, intracranial tumor, or stroke; (6) no hematological disease, infectious disease, or serve diseases of the other systems, such as serious heart disease, metabolic syndrome, uremia, cirrhosis, or malignancy; and (7) no severe visual or auditory disorders. For the healthy control group, we collected the results of age-matched and gender-matched healthy individuals who performed their annual health check-ups at the hospital. Before participating in the study, all participants provided written informed consent, and ethics approval was granted by the institutional ethical committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital. The study complied with the World Medical Association Code of Ethics (Declaration of Helsinki).

2.2. Data Source and Variables

The demographic characteristics of the patients, including age, gender, and disease spectrum (HFS or TN), as well as other clinical information relevant to this case, were registered. We also recorded the MMSE score, duration of anesthesia, time from symptoms to treatment, and hospitalization after surgery. Delirium was diagnosed and categorized by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V, 2013) [28]. A postoperative delirium assessment was conducted twice a day until the seventh day after surgery. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) [29] was used to assess the severity of delirium. After the patient’s diagnosis of delirium was confirmed, the MDAS score was assessed every 2 days by two trained physicians. Triplicate results within 7 days after surgery were averaged, and the mean MDAS score was taken as the patient’s MDAS score. PND was defined as the change in the MMSE score between baseline and 6 weeks post surgery, in line with the method applied in the study of Saxena et al. [29]. A neuropsychological assessment was carried out in a quiet setting on the ward. Investigators were trained to administer the tests by the psychologists responsible for the development of the test battery, and regular visits were made to ensure uniform collection of the data and administration of the assessment.

2.3. Measurements

A peripheral venous blood sample was collected on the first preoperative and postoperative days from 209 patients after an overnight fast. Serum NSE and S100β levels were determined by centrifuging samples at 1500× g, aliquoting, and freezing them at −80 °C. Commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were used to quantify NSE and S100β in duplicate (Abcam ELISA, Shanghai, China, and Hengyuan ELISA, Shanghai, China, respectively) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Analyses were conducted using the mean values of two measurements. Each determination was carried out by the same lab technician blinded to the clinical information.

2.4. Statistical Methods

In this study, SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) and R studio 4.1.2(R Studio, Boston, MA, USA) were used to analyze the data. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. GraphPad Prism Software version 9.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and R studio 4.1.2 (R Studio, Boston, MA, USA) were used to design the graphics. An analysis of data normality was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or the Shapiro–Wilk test. There was no normal distribution of continuous data; thus, median values were presented (interquartile ranges). Frequencies (percentages) were used to express categorical data. Continuous data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical data between two groups were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to calculate bivariate correlations. The variables that were confirmed to be significant were then combined into linear regression with multiple variables to examine the association between NSE levels and S100β levels. We assessed predictors of POD and adjusted for possible confounders using binary logistic regression. The variables that predicted POD with univariate logistic regression models were then analyzed using multivariate models. An odds ratio (OR) was estimated, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. On the basis of the areas under curves (AUCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained from the precision–recall (PR) curves, optimal prediction sensitivities and specificities were determined.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population Characteristics

According to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 81 male and 128 female patients were included in the study. For comparison with the patients, we collected 209 older healthy controls of similar ages and genders. Table 1 presents a summary of the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients. In total, 32 (15.32%) of the 209 recruitment patients were lost to follow-up, and 177 people had complete MMSE data. We classified delirium into three types: the hyperactive type (n = 14), the hypoactive type (n = 26), and the mixed type (n = 6). In addition, the severity of delirium was assessed using the MDAS (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, scores 0–30).

3.2. Serum NSE Levels and Other Variables

The comparisons of serum NSE levels among different groups are demonstrated in Figure 1. No statistically significant difference was found between the serum NSE levels of patients and healthy controls before surgery. There was a significant increase in postoperative serum NSE levels compared with preoperative serum NSE levels in patients. The postoperative serum NSE levels of patients were consistently higher than those of healthy controls (Figure 1A). In addition, 46 (22.01%) of 209 patients were identified as POD in this study, and postoperative serum NSE levels were significantly higher in POD patients compared to non-POD patients (Figure 1B). However, no significant differences in postoperative serum NSE levels were seen between patients with different types of delirium occurring after surgery (Figure 1C). In addition, we used the MDAS scale to score the degree of postoperative delirium in patients. No significant difference in delirium severity was found between the different delirium types, and no significant correlation was found between delirium severity and postoperative serum NSE levels (p = 0.1953, Pearson’s r = −0.1945) (Figure 1D,E).
An analysis of bivariate correlations showed that postoperative serum NSE levels were significantly associated with age, baseline MMSE, anesthesia duration, hospitalization following surgery, serum CRP levels, and serum S100β levels (Table 1). An analysis of a multivariate linear regression model revealed an independent association between serum NSE and serum S100β levels after incorporating the previously determined significant variables (t = 2.690, p = 0.008) (Figure 2).

3.3. POD Prediction

As presented in Table 2, through univariate analysis, we could find that the POD patients were older and had lower baseline MMSE scores, longer anesthesia duration, more prolonged postoperative hospitalization, higher levels of serum CRP, higher levels of serum NSE, and higher levels of serum S100β. Subsequently, the abovementioned parameters were introduced into the binary logistic regression model after being proven significant in univariate analysis, and it was presented that age (OR = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.040–1.277, p = 0.006), serum NSE levels (OR = 1.326, 95% CI = 1.177–1.494, p < 0.001), and serum S100β levels (OR = 1.006, 95% CI = 1.000–1.012, p = 0.048) were the three independent predictors for POD. In addition, among the 177 patients with complete MMSE scores, a total of 45 patients (25.42%) experienced PND. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the POD group and the non-POD group regarding the incidence of PND (p = 0.026).
Figure 3 demonstrates the predictive value (PR curve) of age, serum NSE levels, and serum S100β levels, as well as their combinations, for the occurrence of POD. An optimal cutoff value of serum NSE levels (15.80 ng/mL) was selected according to the PR curve. The corresponding AUC was 0.876 (95% CI 0.829–0.924, p < 0.0001). According to the AUC, the discriminatory ability of serum NSE levels was close to that of the serum S100β level (AUC = 0.879, 95% CI = 0.825–0.933, p < 0.0001) and significantly higher than that of age (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.755–0.871, p < 0.0001). When combining these three features to analyze the validity of prediction efficacy, the highest AUC value was obtained (AUC = 0.950, 95% CI = 0.917–0.982, p < 0.0001).

4. Discussion

The present study indicated that more than 20% of MVD surgical patients experienced delirium postoperatively with a high occurrence rate of PND. The pathophysiology of PODs is unclear, and the cause of POD is also multifactorial. There are insufficient data available to make recommendations on the best way to reduce the incidence of POD using clinical therapy. In this study, there was an obvious increase in serum NSE levels following surgery in all patients compared with controls. A significant difference was also observed in the levels of postoperative serum NSE between patients who developed POD and those without. Furthermore, no significant differences in postoperative serum NSE levels were seen as a function of the type and severity of delirium, indicating that NSE is involved in the occurrence of delirium without affecting the type and severity. However, this result needs to be confirmed in a larger cohort, especially with more delirious patients. In the analysis of POD predictors, age, serum NSE levels, and serum S100β levels were identified as being the three independent factors. Moreover, serum NSE levels showed a strong predictive power for POD. In other words, serum levels of NSE following MVD surgery might serve as a potential biomarker to differentiate older participants who develop POD from those who do not.
A number of previous studies examined the role of NSE in glycolysis in neural and neuroendocrine tissues. The ability of serum NSE levels to predict functional neurological outcomes in stroke patients is a matter of recent interest, with some studies suggesting that NSE is useful in predicting functional outcomes [30,31,32,33]. Zaheer et al. studied 75 patients who suffered from acute ischemic stroke to estimate the relationship between levels of NSE at admission and infarct volume, the severity of the stroke, and early functional neurological outcome. The results showed that there was a significant negative correlation between the Glasgow Coma Scale at presentation and concentration of NSE on day 1, and a positive correlation between the concentration of NSE on day 1 and early neurological outcome as evaluated by the modified Rankin scale on day 30 [31]. In the study, NSE serum levels were shown to function as a useful indicator of stroke severity and functional outcome in the early stages of ischemic stroke. Similarly, NSE levels have been shown to improve diagnosis and outcome evaluation across a variety of clinical situations, such as seizures, intracerebral hemorrhage, and comatose patients following cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest, as well as traumatic brain injury [18,19,21,22,34,35]. In addition, overexpressed NSE and S100β proteins have been reported to potentially damage the brain tissue [36]. Changes in the levels of NSE or S100β in serum or cerebral spinal fluid may reflect the damage of neurons and glial cells. Kimura et al. assessed the NSE before and 1 day after thoracic aortic surgery to show that it is a significant predictor of neurologic complications [37]. Zhang et al. investigated that the RNA interference (iRNA)-mediated silencing of the S100β gene could improve the recovery of nerve function while inhibiting the apoptosis of hippocampal cells in rats with ischemic stroke [38]. It was shown that S100β was the strongest independent marker in the pathogenesis of delirium [25,26,27]. In this study, the results exhibited that NSE was an independent predictor for POD. Additionally, the level of serum NSE correlated independently with that of serum S100β. Consequently, accumulating evidence implies that NSE could contribute to POD pathophysiology.
Delirium is an acute medical emergency, with psychiatric manifestations, which is seen across different treatment settings [39]. In our study, delirium was found to occur in 22.01% of postoperative MVD patients. Previous studies on the mechanisms of delirium development have proposed various hypotheses, such as neuroinflammation, neuronal aging, oxidative stress, neurotransmitter deficiency, neuroendocrine, circadian dysregulation, and network disconnection, including a variety of mechanisms, such as neurotransmitter synthesis and functional alterations, which may interact to jointly mediate the various cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions associated with delirium [40,41,42]. Several previous studies have suggested predictive indicators of postoperative delirium. Ross et al. discovered that abnormalities in resting-state EEG spectral power or TMS plasticity may indicate a subclinical risk for post-surgery delirium [43]. Lin et al. collected 740 patients, 83 of whom developed postoperative delirium, and examined preoperative biochemical markers of cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting that the preoperative α-syn protein level in cerebrospinal fluid can be a predictor of postoperative delirium [44]. The risk of POD can be attributed to many variables, but age continues to be an independent factor that is well established [8,45]. Moreover, according to Mu et al., delirium is also associated with operative time. Evidence suggests that, as the operation continues, higher cumulative anesthesia dosage results in a higher incidence of delirium [46]. Moreover, it is well known that inflammatory mediators, such as serum CRP, also play a crucial role in activating glial cells during POD development, which leads to inflammation and brain damage [47,48,49]. The present study supports these findings. In light of the fact that NSE has been reported in many previous studies of brain-related disorders, we investigated the clinical association between NSE and postoperative delirium. Our study found that patients with delirium secondary to MVD surgery had significantly elevated serum NSE levels. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is known to be a cell-specific isoenzyme of the glycolytic enzyme enolase and may be induced by intraoperative effects on nerve and brain tissue, suggesting that NSE could be an important marker for the development of postoperative delirium after MVD.
In addition, we discuss the mechanisms via which delirium is induced following MVD. Given the process of MVD from craniotomy to the intraoperative stage, in addition to neurological disturbance, there may be blood flow into the subarachnoid space and subsequent stimulation of brain tissue and neurovascularity. Previous studies have confirmed that, after subarachnoid hemorrhage, cell-free hemoglobin (CFH) may disrupt vascular endothelial cells, induce increased cerebrovascular permeability and vasogenic brain edema, promote inflammatory cell infiltration (especially mononuclear macrophages), and mediate multiple pathological processes after SAH [50,51]. Pathologic heme exposure is a major mediator of SAH pathology, and CFH disruption of vascular endothelial cells may affect the expression of adropin. Adropin, a conserved peptide hormone highly expressed in the brain and liver, acts directly on endothelial cells to produce cytoprotective and vascular protective effects by stimulating nitric oxide (NO) production [52]. Studies have confirmed that exposure to cell-free hemoglobin significantly reduces adropin expression in vascular endothelial cells, suggesting that adropin could be an important predictive marker for the occurrence of endothelial cell damage after craniotomy in the presence of cell-free hemoglobin [50]. In addition, Banerjee et al. found in mice that adropin was significantly expressed in neurons, oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, oligodendrocytes cells, and microglia, and its expression correlated with neurodegeneration and cell metabolism-related genomes. Treatment with synthetic adropin peptide also reversed age-related cognitive decline and affected the expression of genes involved in morphogenesis and cell metabolism, suggesting an important role for adropin in brain cognitive function [53]. The expression of adropin can be further investigated in the future after MVD surgery and may be able to serve as an important marker of brain cognitive function impairment.
Although delirium is thought to be distinct from PND, the two syndromes may be highly correlated in the short and long term [54,55,56,57]. Various studies have shown that delirium might accelerate the cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer’s disease [58,59,60]. In this study, results showed that patients with POD were more likely to develop PND than patients without POD. Therefore, delirium may have long-term mental health complications that have not been fully investigated and may affect neurofunctional recovery. A larger scale of epidemiological studies will be necessary to identify the relationship between the occurrence of delirium and PND.
Despite the positive results of this study, it had several limitations. Peripheral blood samples were obtained in the postoperative period, meaning that delirium did not formally precede their collection. It is, therefore, possible that delirium contributed to changes in postoperative serum biomarkers. Secondly, 32 patients failed to follow up, and the relationship between serum biomarkers and PND could not be adequately analyzed. Furthermore, due to the fact that all patients in this study were operated on by the same senior neurosurgeon, the model may not be generalizable to other surgical specialties. Therefore, multicenter studies and standard methods of sample collection, as well as long-term follow-up of patients, are necessary to validate these preliminary results in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that postoperative serum NSE levels are independently correlated with serum S100β levels and associated with the development of POD. Additionally, serum NSE levels provide a better indication of POD risk in older adults who undergo MVD surgery. Hence, in older patients who had MVD surgery, NSE might play a role in the pathophysiology of POD, and its clinical determination might help identify those at risk for POD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Q.; data curation, T.G., Z.L. and Z.W.; formal analysis, T.G. and Z.L.; funding acquisition, Z.W.; investigation, J.Q.; methodology, Z.L.; project administration, J.Q. and Z.W.; resources, T.G. and Z.L.; software, Z.L.; supervision, J.Q. and Z.W.; validation, Z.W.; visualization, Z.W.; writing—original draft, T.G.; writing—review and editing, J.Q. and Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62027813 and 8180100922), the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. 7192056), and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. J180005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University (protocol code KY2019-022-02, April 16th, 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

POD: postoperative delirium; MVD: microvascular decompression; NSE: neuro-specific enolase; PND: perioperative neurocognitive disorders; HFS: hemifacial spasm; TN: trigeminal neuralgia; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; DSM-V: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; MDAS: Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AUC: area under the curve; PR: precision–recall curve.

References

  1. Brown, C.H.T.; Faigle, R.; Klinker, L.; Bahouth, M.; Max, L.; LaFlam, A.; Neufeld, K.J.; Mandal, K.; Gottesman, R.F.; Hogue, C.W., Jr. The Association of Brain MRI Characteristics and Postoperative Delirium in Cardiac Surgery Patients. Clin. Ther. 2015, 37, 2686–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Inouye, S.K.; Westendorp, R.G.; Saczynski, J.S. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet 2014, 383, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rudolph, J.L.; Marcantonio, E.R. Review articles: Postoperative delirium: Acute change with long-term implications. Anesth. Analg. 2011, 112, 1202–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zipser, C.M.; Deuel, J.; Ernst, J.; Schubert, M.; von Kanel, R.; Bottger, S. The predisposing and precipitating risk factors for delirium in neurosurgery: A prospective cohort study of 949 patients. Acta Neurochir. 2019, 161, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Lei, L.; Ji, M.; Tong, J.; Zhou, C.M.; Yang, J.J. Predicting postoperative delirium after microvascular decompression surgery with machine learning. J. Clin. Anesth. 2020, 66, 109896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dyer, C.B.; Ashton, C.M.; Teasdale, T.A. Postoperative delirium. A review of 80 primary data-collection studies. Arch. Intern. Med. 1995, 155, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gustafson, Y.; Berggren, D.; Brannstrom, B.; Bucht, G.; Norberg, A.; Hansson, L.I.; Winblad, B. Acute confusional states in elderly patients treated for femoral neck fracture. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1988, 36, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Viderman, D.; Brotfain, E.; Bilotta, F.; Zhumadilov, A. Risk Factors and Mechanisms of Postoperative Delirium After Intracranial Neurosurgical Procedures. Asian J. Anesthesiol. 2020, 58, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haller, S.; Etienne, L.; Kovari, E.; Varoquaux, A.D.; Urbach, H.; Becker, M. Imaging of Neurovascular Compression Syndromes: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Hemifacial Spasm, Vestibular Paroxysmia, and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016, 37, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cao, J.; Jiao, J.; Du, Z.; Xu, W.; Sun, B.; Li, F.; Liu, Y. Combined Hyperactive Dysfunction Syndrome of the Cranial Nerves: A Retrospective Systematic Study of Clinical Characteristics in 44 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2017, 104, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gottesman, R.F.; Grega, M.A.; Bailey, M.M.; Pham, L.D.; Zeger, S.L.; Baumgartner, W.A.; Selnes, O.A.; McKhann, G.M. Delirium after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and late mortality. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 67, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. McCusker, J.; Cole, M.; Dendukuri, N.; Belzile, E.; Primeau, F. Delirium in older medical inpatients and subsequent cognitive and functional status: A prospective study. CMAJ 2001, 165, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Kratz, T.; Heinrich, M.; Schlauss, E.; Diefenbacher, A. Preventing postoperative delirium. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2015, 112, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sanguineti, V.A.; Wild, J.R.; Fain, M.J. Management of postoperative complications: General approach. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2014, 30, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marangos, P.J.; Zomzely-Neurath, C.; York, C. Determination and characterization of neuron specific protein (NSP) associated enolase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1976, 68, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wunderlich, M.T.; Lins, H.; Skalej, M.; Wallesch, C.W.; Goertler, M. Neuron-specific enolase and tau protein as neurobiochemical markers of neuronal damage are related to early clinical course and long-term outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2006, 108, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brouns, R.; De Vil, B.; Cras, P.; De Surgeloose, D.; Marien, P.; De Deyn, P.P. Neurobiochemical markers of brain damage in cerebrospinal fluid of acute ischemic stroke patients. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Brea, D.; Sobrino, T.; Blanco, M.; Cristobo, I.; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, R.; Rodriguez-Yanez, M.; Moldes, O.; Agulla, J.; Leira, R.; Castillo, J. Temporal profile and clinical significance of serum neuron-specific enolase and S100 in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2009, 47, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, S.Y.; Choi, Y.C.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, W.J. Serum neuron-specific enolase level as a biomarker in differential diagnosis of seizure and syncope. J. Neurol. 2010, 257, 1708–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zandbergen, E.G.; Hijdra, A.; Koelman, J.H.; Hart, A.A.; Vos, P.E.; Verbeek, M.M.; de Haan, R.J.; Group, P.S. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma. Neurology 2006, 66, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guzel, A.; Er, U.; Tatli, M.; Aluclu, U.; Ozkan, U.; Duzenli, Y.; Satici, O.; Guzel, E.; Kemaloglu, S.; Ceviz, A.; et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of short-term outcome and its correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg. Rev. 2008, 31, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Meric, E.; Gunduz, A.; Turedi, S.; Cakir, E.; Yandi, M. The prognostic value of neuron-specific enolase in head trauma patients. J. Emerg. Med. 2010, 38, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hafner, A.; Obermajer, N.; Kos, J. gamma-Enolase C-terminal peptide promotes cell survival and neurite outgrowth by activation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signalling pathways. Biochem. J. 2012, 443, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yilmaz, S. Serum NO, S100B, NSE concentrations in migraine and their relationship. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 82, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. van Munster, B.C.; Korevaar, J.C.; Korse, C.M.; Bonfrer, J.M.; Zwinderman, A.H.; de Rooij, S.E. Serum S100B in elderly patients with and without delirium. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2010, 25, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hall, R.J.; Ferguson, K.J.; Andrews, M.; Green, A.J.; White, T.O.; Armstrong, I.R.; MacLullich, A.M. Delirium and cerebrospinal fluid S100B in hip fracture patients: A preliminary study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2013, 21, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. van Munster, B.C.; Bisschop, P.H.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Korevaar, J.C.; Endert, E.; Wiersinga, W.J.; van Oosten, H.E.; Goslings, J.C.; de Rooij, S.E. Cortisol, interleukins and S100B in delirium in the elderly. Brain Cogn. 2010, 74, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Santabarbara, J.; Gracia-Garcia, P.; Pirez, G.; Lopez-Anton, R.; De La Camara, C.; Ventura, T.; Perez-Sastre, M.; Lobo, E.; Saz, P.; Marcos, G.; et al. Mortality in Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosed with DSM-5 Criteria and with Petersen’s Criteria: A 17-Year Follow-Up in a Community Study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2016, 24, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saxena, S.; Rodts, C.; Nuyens, V.; Lazaron, J.; Sosnowski, V.; Verdonk, F.; Seidel, L.; Albert, A.; Boogaerts, J.; Kruys, V.; et al. Preoperative sedentary behavior is neither a risk factor for perioperative neurocognitive disorders nor associated with an increase in peripheral inflammation, a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020, 20, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bharosay, A.; Bharosay, V.V.; Saxena, K.; Varma, M. Role of Brain Biomarker in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Hypertensive Cerebrovascular Ischemic Stroke. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 33, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zaheer, S.; Beg, M.; Rizvi, I.; Islam, N.; Ullah, E.; Akhtar, N. Correlation between serum neuron specific enolase and functional neurological outcome in patients of acute ischemic stroke. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2013, 16, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bharosay, A.; Bharosay, V.V.; Varma, M.; Saxena, K.; Sodani, A.; Saxena, R. Correlation of Brain Biomarker Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) with Degree of Disability and Neurological Worsening in Cerebrovascular Stroke. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2012, 27, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Topuzova, M.P.; Alekseeva, T.M.; Panina, E.B.; Vavilova, T.V.; Kovzelev, P.D.; Portik, O.A.; Skoromets, A.A. [The possibility of using neuron-specific enolase as a biomarker in the acute period of stroke]. Zhurnal Nevrol. I Psikhiatrii Im. SS Korsakova 2019, 119, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wijdicks, E.F.; Hijdra, A.; Young, G.B.; Bassetti, C.L.; Wiebe, S.; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2006, 67, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meynaar, I.A.; Oudemans-van Straaten, H.M.; van der Wetering, J.; Verlooy, P.; Slaats, E.H.; Bosman, R.J.; van der Spoel, J.I.; Zandstra, D.F. Serum neuron-specific enolase predicts outcome in post-anoxic coma: A prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yuan, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Yang, S.; Yu, N.; Guo, F. NSE, S100B and MMP9 Expression Following Reperfusion after Carotid Artery Stenting. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2019, 16, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kimura, F.; Kadohama, T.; Kitahara, H.; Ise, H.; Nakanishi, S.; Akasaka, N.; Kamiya, H. Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase Level as Predictor of Neurologic Outcome after Aortic Surgery. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2020, 68, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, J.H.; Li, J.K.; Ma, L.L.; Lou, J.Y. RNA interference-mediated silencing of S100B improves nerve function recovery and inhibits hippocampal cell apoptosis in rat models of ischemic stroke. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 8095–8111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grover, S.; Kathiravan, S.; Dua, D. Delirium Research in India: A Systematic Review. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2021, 12, 236–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maldonado, J.R. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: Review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2013, 21, 1190–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maldonado, J.R. Delirium pathophysiology: An updated hypothesis of the etiology of acute brain failure. Int. J. Geriatr Psychiatry 2018, 33, 1428–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Du, H.; Yang, C.; Lin, G. Postoperative Delirium in Neurosurgical Patients: Recent Insights into the Pathogenesis. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ross, J.M.; Santarnecchi, E.; Lian, S.J.; Fong, T.G.; Touroutoglou, A.; Cavallari, M.; Travison, T.G.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Libermann, T.A.; Schmitt, E.M.; et al. Neurophysiologic predictors of individual risk for post-operative delirium after elective surgery. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lin, X.; Guo, Y.; Dong, R.; Wang, B.; Bi, Y. Potential value of cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein in the identification of postoperative delirium undergoing knee/hip arthroplasty: The perioperative neurocognitive disorder and biomarker lifestyle study. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 935869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Oh, E.S.; Fong, T.G.; Hshieh, T.T.; Inouye, S.K. Delirium in Older Persons: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA 2017, 318, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mu, D.L.; Wang, D.X.; Li, L.H.; Shan, G.J.; Li, J.; Yu, Q.J.; Shi, C.X. High serum cortisol level is associated with increased risk of delirium after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective cohort study. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cerejeira, J.; Nogueira, V.; Luis, P.; Vaz-Serra, A.; Mukaetova-Ladinska, E.B. The cholinergic system and inflammation: Common pathways in delirium pathophysiology. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012, 60, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Neerland, B.E.; Hall, R.J.; Seljeflot, I.; Frihagen, F.; MacLullich, A.M.; Raeder, J.; Wyller, T.B.; Watne, L.O. Associations Between Delirium and Preoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Interleukin-6 Receptor in Individuals with Acute Hip Fracture. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016, 64, 1456–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Vasunilashorn, S.M.; Dillon, S.T.; Inouye, S.K.; Ngo, L.H.; Fong, T.G.; Jones, R.N.; Travison, T.G.; Schmitt, E.M.; Alsop, D.C.; Freedman, S.D.; et al. High C-Reactive Protein Predicts Delirium Incidence, Duration, and Feature Severity After Major Noncardiac Surgery. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017, 65, e109–e116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Dodd, W.S.; Laurent, D.; Dumont, A.S.; Hasan, D.M.; Jabbour, P.M.; Starke, R.M.; Hosaka, K.; Polifka, A.J.; Hoh, B.L.; Chalouhi, N. Pathophysiology of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Review. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e021845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dodd, W.S.; Patel, D.; Lucke-Wold, B.; Hosaka, K.; Chalouhi, N.; Hoh, B.L. Adropin decreases endothelial monolayer permeability after cell-free hemoglobin exposure and reduces MCP-1-induced macrophage transmigration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 582, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Akkaya, H.; Güntürk, E.E.; Akkaya, F.; Karabıyık, U.; Güntürk, İ.; Yılmaz, S. Assessment of the Relationship Between the Adropin Levels and the Coronary Collateral Circulation in Patients wıth Chronic Coronary Syndrome. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2022, 119, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Banerjee, S.; Ghoshal, S.; Girardet, C.; DeMars, K.M.; Yang, C.; Niehoff, M.L.; Nguyen, A.D.; Jayanth, P.; Hoelscher, B.A.; Xu, F.; et al. Adropin correlates with aging-related neuropathology in humans and improves cognitive function in aging mice. NPJ Aging Mech. Dis. 2021, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Monk, T.G.; Weldon, B.C.; Garvan, C.W.; Dede, D.E.; van der Aa, M.T.; Heilman, K.M.; Gravenstein, J.S. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2008, 108, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rudolph, J.L.; Schreiber, K.A.; Culley, D.J.; McGlinchey, R.E.; Crosby, G.; Levitsky, S.; Marcantonio, E.R. Measurement of post-operative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery: A systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2010, 54, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rudolph, J.L.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Culley, D.J.; Silverstein, J.H.; Rasmussen, L.S.; Crosby, G.J.; Inouye, S.K. Delirium is associated with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Anaesthesia 2008, 63, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wacker, P.; Nunes, P.V.; Cabrita, H.; Forlenza, O.V. Post-Operative delirium is associated with poor cognitive outcome and dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2006, 21, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fong, T.G.; Jones, R.N.; Shi, P.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Yap, L.; Rudolph, J.L.; Yang, F.M.; Kiely, D.K.; Inouye, S.K. Delirium accelerates cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009, 72, 1570–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Popp, J. Delirium and cognitive decline: More than a coincidence. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Racine, A.M.; Touroutoglou, A.; Abrantes, T.; Wong, B.; Fong, T.G.; Cavallari, M.; Travison, T.G.; Gou, Y.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Alsop, D.C.; et al. Older Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Cortical Atrophy Who Develop Post-Operative Delirium May Be at Increased Risk of Long-Term Cognitive Decline After Surgery. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 75, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparisons of serum NSE levels between the healthy controls and the patients (A), between patients with POD and those without POD (B), and among patients with different types of delirium (C). There was no clear correlation between MDAS scores or the type of delirium and postoperative serum NSE levels (D,E). ns: no significance.
Figure 1. Comparisons of serum NSE levels between the healthy controls and the patients (A), between patients with POD and those without POD (B), and among patients with different types of delirium (C). There was no clear correlation between MDAS scores or the type of delirium and postoperative serum NSE levels (D,E). ns: no significance.
Jvd 02 00001 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between postoperative serum NSE levels and serum S100β levels in older participants undergoing MVD surgery.
Figure 2. Relationship between postoperative serum NSE levels and serum S100β levels in older participants undergoing MVD surgery.
Jvd 02 00001 g002
Figure 3. PR curves of age (A), postoperative serum NSE level (B), postoperative serum S100β level (C), and the combination of all three features (D) for discriminating POD in older participants undergoing MVD surgery.
Figure 3. PR curves of age (A), postoperative serum NSE level (B), postoperative serum S100β level (C), and the combination of all three features (D) for discriminating POD in older participants undergoing MVD surgery.
Jvd 02 00001 g003
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and laboratory examinations and parameters correlated with serum NSE levels after MVD in older patients.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and laboratory examinations and parameters correlated with serum NSE levels after MVD in older patients.
VariableRangeNumber/Median (IQR) Correlation Analysis
r-Valuep-Value
Gender (male/female) 81/1280.0480.490
Age (years)65–9273 (67–78)0.1670.016
Type of diseases 0.0240.735
HFS 102
TN 107
Time from symptoms to treatment (months)6–12121 (15–43.5)0.0270.693
Baseline MMSE score24–3029 (27–30)0.261<0.001
Duration of anesthesia (min) 66–15491 (82–97)0.2150.002
Hospitalization after surgery (days)7–158 (8–9)0.314<0.001
CRP1–7110 (9–16)0.1570.023
IL-62.00–325.0028.80 (14.70–62.65)0.0470.495
TNF-a4.00–179.0010.40 (7.00–12.05)0.0450.514
S100β310.00–1138.67529.05 (419.52–600.48)0.1890.006
HbA1c4.4–9.46.00 (5.50–6.45)0.1110.109
Type of delirium
Hyperactive
Hypoactive
Mixed
MDAS score (0–30)
<10
<20
≤30

14
26
6

5
33
8
Notes: Continuous data and categorical data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges, IQRs) and frequencies (percentages), respectively. Bivariate correlation was determined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Table 2. Factors related to POD after MVD in older patients.
Table 2. Factors related to POD after MVD in older patients.
VariablePODNon-PODp-ValueOR (95% CI)p-ValueOR (95% CI)
Univariate RegressionMultivariate Regression
Gender 0.4950.958 (0.200–4.589)
Male2061
Female26102
Age (years)78.5 (76–82)70 (67–75)<0.0011.159 (1.044–1.288)0.0061.153 (1.040–1.277)
Type of disease 0.6201.286 (0.237–6.975)
HFS2478
TN2285
Time from symptoms to treatment (months)20.5 (14.5–45.25)21 (15–42)0.9451.011 (0.984–1.040)
Baseline MMSE score
PND
26 (25–27)
17(43)
29 (28–30)
28(134)
<0.001
0.026
0.469 (0.289–0.763)
2.475(1.178–5.005)
Duration of anesthesia (min) 98.5 (93–105.25)88 (80–95)<0.0011.121 (1.022–1.229)
Hospitalization after surgery9 (9–10)9 (8–9)<0.0013.620 (1.344–9.751)
HbA1c6.00 (5.50–6.43)6.00 (5.50–6.50)0.8480.791 (0.363–1.722)
CRP19 (10.75–34)10 (9–13)<0.0011.143 (1.052–1.241)
IL-631.95 (19.13–67.35)27.30 (12.90–59.60)0.1330.993 (0.973–1.014)
TNF-a10.80 (7.17–12.42)10.40 (7.00–11.70)0.2180.955 (0.888–1.026)
S100β562.98 (419.52–771.90)463.67 (387.00–600.48)0.0061.006 (1.000–1.012)0.0481.006 (1.000–1.012)
NSE17.80 (16.60–32.30)11.20 (7.34–14.90)<0.0011.357 (1.184–1.554)<0.0011.326 (1.177–1.494)
Notes: Continuous data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges). Categorical data are expressed as frequencies (percentages). Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical data. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, T.; Liu, Z.; Qi, J.; Wu, Z. Relationship of Postoperative Serum Neuro-Specific Enolase Levels with Postoperative Delirium Occurring after Microvascular Depression Surgery in Older Patients. J. Vasc. Dis. 2023, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd2010001

AMA Style

Guo T, Liu Z, Qi J, Wu Z. Relationship of Postoperative Serum Neuro-Specific Enolase Levels with Postoperative Delirium Occurring after Microvascular Depression Surgery in Older Patients. Journal of Vascular Diseases. 2023; 2(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd2010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Tengxian, Zhenxing Liu, Ji Qi, and Zhen Wu. 2023. "Relationship of Postoperative Serum Neuro-Specific Enolase Levels with Postoperative Delirium Occurring after Microvascular Depression Surgery in Older Patients" Journal of Vascular Diseases 2, no. 1: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd2010001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop