Next Issue
Volume 2, March
Previous Issue
Volume 1, September
 
 

Poultry, Volume 1, Issue 4 (December 2022) – 6 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 289 KiB  
Article
Variable Effects of the In Ovo Administration of an Escherichia coli Vaccine in the Amnion or Air Cell on Commercial Layer Embryo and Hatchling Development
by Lauren L. Lindsey, Katie Elaine Collins Elliott, Seyed Abolghasem Fatemi, Jeff D. Evans, Ayoub Mousstaaid, Patrick D. Gerard and Edgar David Peebles
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 278-290; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040023 - 08 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1570
Abstract
The effects of injecting the Poulvac E. coli vaccine (PECV) into either the air cell (AC) or amnion (AM) at different dosages at 18 days of incubation (DOI) on Hy-Line W-36-layer embryo and hatchling development were investigated. Serial dilutions of the PECV in [...] Read more.
The effects of injecting the Poulvac E. coli vaccine (PECV) into either the air cell (AC) or amnion (AM) at different dosages at 18 days of incubation (DOI) on Hy-Line W-36-layer embryo and hatchling development were investigated. Serial dilutions of the PECV in diluent provided either 6.5 × 104, 6.5 × 103, 6.5 × 102, or 6.5 × 101 CFU dosages of E. coli. A diluent only injection treatment was included as a control. A total of 19 live embryonated eggs in each of 10 treatment groups were represented on each of 16 replicate levels (3040 total) in the hatcher unit. At 19 DOI, swabs of the AM indicated that the 6.5 × 101 and 6.5 × 102 CFU dosages provided a 50% level of PECV presence, whereas the 6.5 × 103 and 6.5 × 104 CFU dosages provided a 100% level of PECV presence. Conversely, only the 6.5 × 103 and 6.5 × 104 CFU dosages provided a 50% level of PECV presence in the AC. At all E. coli dosage levels, injection in the AM led to higher percentages of live or dead embryos that failed to pip (PEIS) (p = 0.001) or complete hatch (PEPE) (p ≤ 0.001) and a lower percentage of live fully hatched chicks (HI) (p ≤ 0.001), when compared to those injected in the AC. Like HI, significantly lower percentages of female hatchlings were also observed at 22 DOI for the AM compared to the AC injection, for all dosages except for the 6.5 × 102 CFU dosage. However, at all the dosages above the 6.5 × 101 CFU dosage, the AM injection resulted in a lower mean hatchling body weight (p = 0.010) at 22 DOI. In conclusion, E. coli populations were more prevalent in the AM than in the AC after the injection of the PECV in those sites. Furthermore, the injection of the PECV in the AM at all E. coli dosages generally increased late embryo mortality and decreased hatchability and hatchling body weight in comparison to an AC injection. It is concluded that the negative impact of the in ovo administration of the PECV in the AM at 18 DOI on the hatch process is dose dependent. However, effects of an increase in AC dosages and a decrease in AM dosages should be further investigated. Full article
32 pages, 1666 KiB  
Review
Oxidation in Poultry Feed: Impact on the Bird and the Efficacy of Dietary Antioxidant Mitigation Strategies
by Alexandra Desbruslais and Alexandra L. Wealleans
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 246-277; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040022 - 07 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3229
Abstract
Oxidative reactions in premixes or final-compound feed pose considerable challenges to the poultry industry, both in terms of rancidity reducing palatability and shelf life and in vivo oxidative stress negatively impacting animal performance. Whilst there has been broad awareness of feed oxidation for [...] Read more.
Oxidative reactions in premixes or final-compound feed pose considerable challenges to the poultry industry, both in terms of rancidity reducing palatability and shelf life and in vivo oxidative stress negatively impacting animal performance. Whilst there has been broad awareness of feed oxidation for many years, recognition of the impact of oxidative stress on the poultry industry has grown in the past twenty years. The appearance of woody breast and associated muscle meat myopathies has led to a rapid increase in research output and awareness of in vivo oxidative reactions. Oxidative stress has been widely demonstrated to damage tissue, lipids, and DNA, and is thought to be linked to conditions such as leaky gut, coccidiosis, and ascites, amongst others. The use of dietary antioxidants has been found to both protect feed from oxidation and ameliorate some of the detrimental effects associated with oxidative stress, including improving performance, increasing antioxidant capacity, and mitigating the effects of heat and transport stress. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide insight into the process of in-feed oxidation and in vivo oxidation including a summary of the benefits of different kinds of antioxidants in feed as well as their potential in vivo added value, based on findings reported within all scientific literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 432 KiB  
Obituary
A Tribute to Dr. Elio Corti, August 23, 1942–September 9, 2017
by Elly Vogelaar, Michael N. Romanov and Annett Güntherodt
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 243-245; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040021 - 17 Oct 2022
Viewed by 958
Abstract
This year we mark the 80th anniversary of the renowned and internationally recognized Italian poultry writer, expert, fancier and breeder Dr. Elio Corti [...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1620 KiB  
Review
A Walk through Gumboro Disease
by Maria Pia Franciosini and Irit Davidson
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 229-242; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040020 - 07 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4953
Abstract
Infectious bursal disease (IBD), caused by an Avibirnavirus, belonging to the family Birnaviridae, is an immunosuppressive disease that affects 3–6-week-old chickens, resulting in clinical or subclinical infection. Although clinical disease occurs in chickens, turkeys, ducks, guinea fowl, and ostriches can be [...] Read more.
Infectious bursal disease (IBD), caused by an Avibirnavirus, belonging to the family Birnaviridae, is an immunosuppressive disease that affects 3–6-week-old chickens, resulting in clinical or subclinical infection. Although clinical disease occurs in chickens, turkeys, ducks, guinea fowl, and ostriches can be also infected. IBD virus (IBDV) causes lymphoid depletion of the bursa, which is responsible for the severe depression of the humoral antibody response, primarily if this occurs within the first 2 weeks of life. IBD remains an issue in chicken meat production due to economic losses caused by the spread of variants or subtypes, resistant to the most common vaccines, responsible for a subclinical disease characterized by reduced growth performance and increased susceptibility to secondary infections. Very virulent strains of classical serotype 1 are also common in several countries and can cause severe disease with up to 90% mortality. This review mainly focuses on the immunosuppressive effect of the IBDV and potential vaccination strategies, capable of overcoming challenges associated with the optimal time for vaccination of offspring, which is dependent on maternal immunity and IBDV variant occurrence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1347 KiB  
Article
Antioxidant and Metal-Chelating Activities of Bioactive Peptides from Ovotransferrin Produced by Enzyme Combinations
by Hiruni Sashikala Wickramasinghe, Edirisinghe Dewage Nalaka Sandun Abeyrathne, Ki-Chang Nam and Dong Uk Ahn
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 220-228; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040019 - 27 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1263
Abstract
Peptides produced from food sources possess numerous bioactivities that make them useful in improving human health and preventing diseases. Although many studies related to egg protein hydrolysis are available, little work has been conducted on the production of bioactive peptides from apo-ovotransferrin (OTF) [...] Read more.
Peptides produced from food sources possess numerous bioactivities that make them useful in improving human health and preventing diseases. Although many studies related to egg protein hydrolysis are available, little work has been conducted on the production of bioactive peptides from apo-ovotransferrin (OTF) using two-step enzyme hydrolysis. The objectives of this study were to produce bioactive peptides from OTF using two enzymes and to determine their functional properties. Lipolyzed OTF was prepared at a concentration of 20 mg/mL and treated with protease (3 h at 55 °C), papain (3 h at 37 °C), elastase (24 h at 25 °C), and α-chymotrypsin (3 h at 37 °C) as the first enzyme treatment. The hydrolysates from the first step of hydrolysis were treated with the above enzymes in different combinations and incubated for 24 h at their optimum temperatures, followed by heat inactivation at the end of each treatment. Based on 15% SDS-PAGE results, the nine best enzyme combinations were selected for further analysis. Papain + protease (PapPro, 0.0075 ± 0.004 malondialdehyde (MDA) mg/kg), α-chymotrypsin + papain (ChyPap, 0.081 ± 0.003 MDA mg/kg), and elastase + α-chymotrypsin (ElaChy, 0.083 ± 0.015 MDA mg/kg) showed strong antioxidant activity. PapPro showed the highest Fe-chelating activity (5.40 ± 0.85%) but lacked Cu-chelating activity. In conclusion, PapPro, ChyPap, and ElaChy treatments of OTF produced peptides with strong antioxidant and Fe-chelating activities but lacked Cu-chelating activity. Thus, ovotransferrin hydrolysates produced using PapPro, ChyPap, and ElaChy treatments have the potential to reduce oxidative stress in the body. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 799 KiB  
Systematic Review
Phenotypic Characterization of Local Chickens in West Africa: Systematic Review
by Adamou Guisso Taffa, Nassim Moula, Salissou Issa, Chaibou Mahamadou and Johann Detilleux
Poultry 2022, 1(4), 207-219; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry1040018 - 21 Sep 2022
Viewed by 2545
Abstract
This review analyzes the processes of phenotypic and morpho-biometric characterization of West African local chicken. Data were collected on a set of 44 articles, and other reference documents were used to analyze and discuss the data collected. Existing studies on the phenotypic and [...] Read more.
This review analyzes the processes of phenotypic and morpho-biometric characterization of West African local chicken. Data were collected on a set of 44 articles, and other reference documents were used to analyze and discuss the data collected. Existing studies on the phenotypic and molecular characterization of local chicken populations in West Africa indicate the presence of a wide variety of plumage colors and conformations, and intra-population genetic diversity. However, none of these studies have been able to identify the existence of a differentiated subpopulation that can be assimilated into a distinct race. The conclusions of this studies are not sufficient to ensure the non-existence of “race” in West Africa because many of these studies focus only on the phenotypic aspect, while molecular characterization makes it possible to identify differentiated populations with certainty. Additionally, the populations studied are often small in size, though remaining within the FAO recommendation standards. The spatial distribution used to compare the subpopulations was based on agroecological zones with strong interconnections to and shared with West African human populations, to the detriment of socio-cultural realities. In order to be more effective and conclusive, characterization work could consider the spatial distance of subpopulations in a comparison and the levels of exchange between the human communities from which these chicken subpopulations originate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop