Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Selection
2.2. Operative Parameters
2.3. Outcome Measures
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lespasio, M.J.; Piuzzi, N.S.; Husni, M.E.; Muschler, G.F.; Guarino, A.; Mont, M.A. Knee Osteoarthritis: A Primer. Perm. J. 2017, 21, 16–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zeng, N.; Yan, Z.P.; Chen, X.Y.; Ni, G.X. Infrapatellar Fat Pad and Knee Osteoarthritis. Aging. Dis. 2020, 11, 1317–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmitt, J.; Lange, T.; Gunther, K.P.; Kopkow, C.; Rataj, E.; Apfelbacher, C.; Aringer, M.; Bohle, E.; Bork, H.; Dreinhofer, K.; et al. Indication Criteria for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis—A Multi-perspective Consensus Study. Z. Orthop. Unf. 2017, 155, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, T.K.; Mittal, A.; Meshram, P.; Kim, W.H.; Choi, S.M. Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. Surg. Relat. Res. 2021, 33, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, H.; Siwiec, R.M. Knee Osteoarthritis. In StatPearls; National Library of Medicine: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Anandacoomarasamy, A.; March, L. Current evidence for osteoarthritis treatments. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2010, 2, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassel, S.; Muschter, D. Recent advances in the treatment of osteoarthritis. F1000Res 2020, 9, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozinn, S.C.; Scott, R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Am. 1989, 71, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisowski, L.A.; Meijer, L.I.; van den Bekerom, M.P.; Pilot, P.; Lisowski, A.E. Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective study from a non-designer group. Bone. Joint. J. 2016, 98, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.N.; Smith, T.O.; Sprenger De Rover, W.B.; Walton, N.P. Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A report from an independent centre. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Br. 2011, 93, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greco, N.J.; Lombardi, A.V., Jr.; Price, A.J.; Berend, M.E.; Berend, K.R. Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients Aged Less Than or Equal to 50 Years. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 2435–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, S.A.; Liabaud, B.; Nellans, K.W.; Geller, J.A. Factors associated with poor outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Redefining the "classic" indications for surgery. J. Arthroplast. 2013, 28, 1561–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandit, H.; Jenkins, C.; Gill, H.S.; Smith, G.; Price, A.J.; Dodd, C.A.; Murray, D.W. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Br. 2011, 93, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Smith, T.O.; Chester, R.; Glasgow, M.M.; Donell, S.T. Accelerated rehabilitation following Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Five-year results from an independent centre. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2011, 22, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghomrawi, H.M.; Eggman, A.A.; Pearle, A.D. Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the U.S. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Am. 2015, 97, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Suarez, J.C.; Saxena, A.; Arguelles, W.; Watson Perez, J.M.; Ramamoorthy, V.; Hernandez, Y.; Osondu, C.U. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Risk-adjusted Comparison of 30-day Outcomes Using National Data From 2014 to 2018. Arthroplast. Today 2022, 17, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, Q.; Ma, B. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Surg. Glob. Health 2021, 4, e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikkelsen, M.; Wilson, H.A.; Gromov, K.; Price, A.J.; Troelsen, A. Comparing surgical strategies for end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis: Total versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone. Jt. Open. 2022, 3, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howell, R.E.; Lombardi, A.V., Jr.; Crilly, R.; Opolot, S.; Berend, K.R. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does a Selection Bias Exist? J. Arthroplast. 2015, 30, 1740–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varacallo, M.; Luo, T.D.; Johanson, N.A. Total Knee Arthroplasty Techniques. In StatPearls; National Library of Medicine: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, T.D.; Hubbard, J.B. Arthroplasty Knee Unicompartmental. In StatPearls; National Library of Medicine: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Insall, J.N.; Dorr, L.D.; Scott, R.D.; Scott, W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989, 248, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, D.W.; Fitzpatrick, R.; Rogers, K.; Pandit, H.; Beard, D.J.; Carr, A.J.; Dawson, J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Br. 2007, 89, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, F.; Li, S.C.; Lo, N.N.; Yeo, S.J.; Yang, K.Y.; Yeo, W.; Chong, H.C.; Fong, K.Y.; Thumboo, J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese Versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007, 15, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bin Abd Razak, H.R.; Tan, C.S.; Chen, Y.J.; Pang, H.N.; Tay, K.J.; Chin, P.L.; Chia, S.L.; Lo, N.N.; Yeo, S.J. Age and Preoperative Knee Society Score Are Significant Predictors of Outcomes Among Asians Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Am. 2016, 98, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, P.F.; Jia, Y.H. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: A randomized prospective study. Knee 2012, 19, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dalury, D.F.; Fisher, D.A.; Adams, M.J.; Gonzales, R.A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics 2009, 32, 1213–1226. [Google Scholar]
- Ha, C.W.; Park, Y.B.; Song, Y.S.; Kim, J.H.; Park, Y.G. Increased Range of Motion Is Important for Functional Outcome and Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asian Patients. J. Arthroplast. 2016, 31, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meneghini, R.M.; Pierson, J.L.; Bagsby, D.; Berend, M.E.; Ritter, M.A.; Meding, J.B. The effect of retropatellar fat pad excision on patellar tendon contracture and functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2007, 22, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moverley, R.; Williams, D.; Bardakos, N.; Field, R. Removal of the infrapatella fat pad during total knee arthroplasty: Does it affect patient outcomes? Int. Orthop. 2014, 38, 2483–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, T.W.; Pandit, H.G.; Jenkins, C.; Mellon, S.J.; Dodd, C.A.F.; Murray, D.W. Evidence-Based Indications for Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in a Consecutive Cohort of Thousand Knees. J. Arthroplast. 2017, 32, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamilton, T.W.; Pandit, H.G.; Maurer, D.G.; Ostlere, S.J.; Jenkins, C.; Mellon, S.J.; Dodd, C.A.F.; Murray, D.W. Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 15-year follow-up. Bone. Jt. J. 2017, 99, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beard, D.J.; Pandit, H.; Ostlere, S.; Jenkins, C.; Dodd, C.A.; Murray, D.W. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Br. 2007, 89, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beard, D.J.; Pandit, H.; Gill, H.S.; Hollinghurst, D.; Dodd, C.A.; Murray, D.W. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J. Bone. Jt. Surg. Br. 2007, 89, 1597–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lum, Z.C.; Lombardi, A.V.; Hurst, J.M.; Morris, M.J.; Adams, J.B.; Berend, K.R. Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. Bone. Jt. J. 2016, 98, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murray, D.W.; Parkinson, R.W. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone. Jt. J. 2018, 100, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stadhouder, A.; Buskens, E.; de Klerk, L.W.; Verhaar, J.A.; Dhert, W.A.; Verbout, A.J.; Vaccaro, A.R.; Oner, F.C. Traumatic thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures: Operative or nonoperative treatment: Comparison of two treatment strategies by means of surgeon equipoise. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casper, D.S.; Fleischman, A.N.; Papas, P.V.; Grossman, J.; Scuderi, G.R.; Lonner, J.H. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Significantly Greater Improvement in Function than Total Knee Arthroplasty Despite Equivalent Satisfaction for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis. J. Arthroplast. 2019, 34, 1611–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Patient Characteristic | TKA 1 (n = 27) | UKA 2 (n = 30) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Mean age, years (±SD 3) | 63.4 (±4.7) | 61 (±5) | 0.063 |
Gender (Male: female) | 10:17 | 11:30 | 0.428 |
Mean BMI 4 (kg/m2) | 27.5 | 28.7 | 0.399 |
Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (±SD) | 2.4 (±1.0) | 2.6 (±1.3) | 0.447 |
Outcome Measures | TKA 1 (n = 27) | UKA 2 (n = 31) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Range of motion, degrees (±SD 3) | 110.7 (±12.8) | 111.0 (±13.1) | 0.940 |
KSKS 4 | 49.4 (±16.2) | 55.7 (±10.7) | 0.081 |
KSFS 5 | 60.9 (±18.8) | 53.6 (±15.7) | 0.108 |
OKS 6 | 28.4 (±6.7) | 24.8 (±7.1) | 0.055 |
Outcome Measure | TKA 1 (n = 27) | UKA 2 (n = 31) | p-Value 7 |
---|---|---|---|
Range of motion, degrees (±SD 3) | 109.9 (±13.9) | 122.9 (±11.7) | <0.001 |
KSKS 4 | 88.2 (±10.6) | 86.6 (±7.5) | 0.492 |
KSFS 5 | 76.5 (±15.4) | 83.0 (±17.8) | 0.143 |
OKS 6 | 43.5 (±3.9) | 41.7 (±5.5) | 0.157 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Soh, T.L.T.; Loh, N.L.K.; Ho, S.W.L.; Kaliya-Perumal, A.-K.; Kau, C.Y. Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population. Rheumato 2023, 3, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rheumato3010001
Soh TLT, Loh NLK, Ho SWL, Kaliya-Perumal A-K, Kau CY. Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population. Rheumato. 2023; 3(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rheumato3010001
Chicago/Turabian StyleSoh, Tamara Lee Ting, Nicholas Li Khai Loh, Sean Wei Loong Ho, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal, and Chung Yuan Kau. 2023. "Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population" Rheumato 3, no. 1: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rheumato3010001