Next Article in Journal
The Regular Black Hole by Gravitational Decoupling
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Picture of Electron Spin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Bianchi Type-I Universe in Modified Theory of Gravity †

by
Bhupendra Kumar Shukla
1,‡,
Rishi Kumar Tiwari
2,‡ and
Aroonkumar Beesham
3,4,5,*,‡
1
Department of Mathematics, Government College, Bandri Sagar 470442, India
2
Department of Mathematics, Government Model Science College, Rewa 486001, India
3
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Umlazi 4031, South Africa
4
National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences (NITheCS), Stellenbosch 7611, South Africa
5
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Zululand, Kwa-Dlangezwa 3886, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd Electronic Conference on Universe, 16 February–2 March 2023; Available online: https://ecu2023.sciforum.net/.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 7(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2023-14049
Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd Electronic Conference on Universe)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we have studied an anisotropic Bianchi-I cosmological model in f ( R , T ) gravity. To obtain the exact solutions of the field equations, we have used the condition σ / θ to be a function of the scale factor (IJTP, 54, 2740-2757, 2015). Our model possesses an initial singularity. It initially exhibits decelerating expansion and transits to accelerating expansion at late times. We have also discussed the physical and geometrical properties of the model.

1. Introduction

Undoubtedly, Einstein’s general theory of relativity (GR) is the most widely accepted theory to study the evolution of universe. Early on, before expanding, the universe was in a very small, hot, and dense state. In the light of recent observations of type Ia supernova, it was found that the expansion of universe is in fact accelerating [1,2]. This theory of the accelerating expansion of the universe has been supported by recent observational data [3,4]. To vindicate this acceleration, a new energy that exhibits repulsive force was postulated that is named Dark Energy (DE) [5,6,7]. The universe is constituted of three forms of matter/energy, viz., 68.5 % DE, 26.6 % dark matter, and only 4.9 % baryonic matter. This is in accordance with observations of the Planck mission team [6].
DE can be quintessence, phantom, k-essence, tachyons, quintom, Chaplygin gas, chameleon, and cosmological constant (CC). The second alternative is a modification of GR. The former is problematic, as the usage of the CC comes with its own drawbacks in the form of theoretical problems such as cosmic coincidence and fine-tuning.
Adopting another approach, the cause for the acceleration of the universe can be sought in modified gravity theories. Harko et al. [8,9] introduced f ( R , T ) gravity, in which f ( R , T ) is a function of T and R, where T is the trace of the energy momentum tensor and R is the Ricci scalar. This theory permits an explanation of accelerated expansion without DE and for the circumvention of the initial singularity. There is a violation of the usual energy conservation [10], but one achieves this with the aid of another condition. It permits the use of a dynamical cosmological parameter [11]. This aids in the likelihood of solving the cosmological constant problem.
In this article, we have studied a cosmological model in f ( R , T ) gravity for a Bianchi-I universe with perfect fluid. We have discussed a cosmological model that isotropizes at late times.

2. Review of f(R, T) and Field Equations

The gravitational action for f ( R , T ) adopts the following form:
S = 1 16 π f ( R , T ) + S m g d x 4 ,
We assume that [8]
f ( R , T ) = R + 2 h ( T ) ,
and put h ( T ) = α T , where α is called the coupling constant of f ( R , T ) gravity. Equation (2) can be rewritten as
f R ( R , T ) R i j 1 2 f ( R , T ) g i j + ( g i j i j ) f R ( R , T ) = 8 π T i j f T ( R , T ) T i j f T ( R , T ) Θ i j .
Here, □ is D’Alembertian operator that is expressed as ( = i j ) , and Θ i j is expressed as
Θ i j = g l m δ T l m δ g i j .
Let us consider that the matter content in the universe is a perfect fluid and that
Θ i j = 2 T i j p g i j ,
where T i j is energy momentum tensor
T i j = ( ρ + p ) u i u j p g i j ,
where ρ and p are the energy density and cosmic pressure, and u i is four velocity vector such that u i u i = 1 . The field equations then adopt the form
R i j 1 2 R g i j = 8 π T i j + 2 f T T i j + [ f ( T ) + 2 p f T ] g i j .
The B-I metric is:
d s 2 = d t 2 + X 2 d x 2 + Y 2 d y 2 + Z 2 d z 2 ,
where X , Y , and Z are function of time t only. Then, from Equations (2) and (7), we obtain:
H ˙ y + H y 2 + H ˙ z + H z 2 + H y H z = ( 8 π + 3 α ) p + α ρ ,
H ˙ x + H x 2 + H ˙ z + H z 2 + H x H z = ( 8 π + 3 α ) p + α ρ ,
H ˙ x + H x 2 + H ˙ y + H y 2 + H x H y = ( 8 π + 3 α ) p + α ρ ,
H x H y + H y H z + H z H x = ( 8 π + 3 α ) α p ,
where H x = X ˙ X , H y = Y ˙ Y , and H z = Z ˙ z . The average scale factor ( a ) is
a 3 = X Y Z .
Using Equations (9) and (10), we obtain
( H ˙ x + H x 2 ) ( H ˙ y + H y 2 ) H z ( H x H y ) = 0 .
After integration, we obtain
H x H y = k 1 a 3 .
Again, by using Equations (10) and (11), we obtain
H y H z = k 2 a 3 ,
where k 1 and k 2 are constants of integration.
From Equations (13), (15), and (16), we obtain
H x = a ˙ a + ( 2 k 1 + k 2 ) 3 a 3 , H y = a ˙ a + ( k 2 k 1 ) 3 a 3 , H z = a ˙ a ( k 1 + 2 k 2 ) 3 a 3 .
The Hubble parameter ( H ) , expansion scalar ( θ ) , deceleration parameter ( q ) , and shear scalar ( σ ) are defined as:
1 3 θ = H = 1 3 ( H x + H y + H z ) , q = d d t 1 H 1 , σ 2 = 1 2 σ i j σ i j ,
Then, we have
σ = k a 3 ,
where 3 k 2 = k 1 2 + k 2 2 + k 1 k 2 . Now, the pressure p and energy density ρ , can be written as:
p = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] 2 ( 8 π + 3 α ) a ¨ a + 8 π a ˙ a 2 + ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 a 6 ,
ρ = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] 2 α a ¨ a + ( 24 π + 8 α ) a ˙ a 2 ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 a 6 .

3. Solutions and Physical Interpretation

In order to obtain solutions, let us require σ / θ to be a function of a ( t ) such that σ / θ is very large at early times, and that it tends to zero for large t . Hence, we choose
σ θ = k 3 a 2 a ˙ = f ( a ) .
After integration, we obtain
k ( t + t 1 ) = 3 a 2 f ( a ) d a ,
where t 1 is a constant of integration. Consider the function f ( a ) as [12]:
f ( a ) = 1 ( n + a 3 ) m ,
where m and n are positive integers. Our motivation for choosing this form of f ( a ) is as follows. The average anisotropy is A ¯ = 6 σ 2 / θ 2 . Now, we want a a cosmological model in which the anisotropy decreases with time and asymptotically approaches zero. One possible way to achieve this is to adopt the form (24), which satisfies this requirement. For this consideration, we obtain, at early times, σ / θ 0 and, at late times, σ / θ 0 . By using Equations (23) and (24), we obtain
k ( t + t 1 ) = 3 a 2 ( n + a 3 ) m d a .
We discuss the solutions for m = 1 and m 1 separately, using t 1 = 0 without a loss of generality.

3.1. m = 1

On integrating the above equation, we obtain
a = [ n ( e k t 1 ) ] 1 3 .
The expansion scalar ( θ ) , shear scalar ( σ ) , and deceleration parameter ( q ) are provided by:
H = k 3 ( 1 e k t ) , θ = k 1 e k t , σ = k n ( e k t 1 ) , q = 1 + 3 e k t .
These can be plotted to observe their behaviour, which will be performed elsewhere. The Hubble parameter H ( t ) is finite for all finite values of t > 0 , and ω > 1 for all finite values of t > 0 . The scale factor ( a ) is zero and the expansion scalar ( θ ) diverges t = 0 . The model possesses an initial singularity. The deceleration parameter ( q ) indicates deceleration at early times and acceleration at late times. In this model, the deceleration parameter lies between 2 and −1.
The anisotropy parameter is:
σ θ = 1 e k t n ( e k t 1 ) .
We see that σ / θ is non-zero and finite at t = 0 , and σ / θ 0 as t . Thus, the model approaches late-time isotropy. The pressure and energy density are provided by:
p = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] 2 ( 8 π + 3 α ) k 2 ( 1 3 e k t ) 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + 8 π k 2 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 [ n ( e k t 1 ) ] 2 ,
ρ = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] 2 α k 2 ( 1 3 e k t ) 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + ( 24 π + 8 α ) k 2 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 [ n ( e k t 1 ) ] 2 .
Here, we observe that the energy density is a positive and decreasing function of t . The equation of state parameter ( ω = p / ρ ) is provided by:
ω = 2 ( 8 π + 3 α ) k 2 ( 1 3 e k t ) 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + 8 π k 2 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 [ n ( e k t 1 ) ] 2 2 α k 2 ( 1 3 e k t ) 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 + ( 24 π + 8 α ) k 2 9 ( 1 e k t ) 2 ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 [ n ( e k t 1 ) ] 2 .
The energy density ρ as t 0 and it approaches zero at late times. The pressure p is negative at late times, and this can be associated with late-time acceleration. The equation of state parameter ω is positive at the beginning, and it approaches −1 as t . The present value of ω of our model is nearly −0.873, which is less than −1/3.

3.2. m 1

In this case, Equation (26) becomes:
a = n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 1 3 .
The scale factor a is increasing for 0 < m < 1 . The Hubble parameter ( H ) , shear scalar ( σ ) , and deceleration parameter ( q ) are:
H = k n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t m 1 m 3 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n ,
σ = k n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n ,
q = 2 3 m 1 n n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m .
We note that the Hubble parameter H ( t ) is finite for all finite values of t > 0 , and ω > 1 for all finite values of t > 0 .
The pressure and energy density are:
p = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] [ 2 ( 8 π + 3 α ) k 2 ( 3 m + 1 ) n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 m 3 ( m n + 1 ) n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 1 m 9 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 + 8 π k 2 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 m 9 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 + ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 ] ,
ρ = 1 [ ( 8 π + 3 α ) 2 α 2 ] [ 2 α k 2 ( 3 m + 1 ) n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 m 3 ( m n + 1 ) n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 1 m 9 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 + ( 24 π + 8 α ) k 2 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 2 m 1 m 9 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 ( 8 π + 4 α ) k 2 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t 1 1 m n 2 ] .
The model has a singularity at t = 0 . The deceleration parameter is initially positive and negative at late times for 2 3 < m < 1 . Again, the universe is initially decelerating and accelerating at late times. The anisotropy parameter is:
σ θ = 1 n 1 m + ( 1 m ) k t m 1 m .
Again, we see that σ / θ is non-zero and finite at t = 0 , and σ / θ 0 as t . Thus, the model approaches late-time isotropy.
The energy density ρ as t 0 and it approaches zero at late times. The pressure p is negative. Negative pressure is associated with the late-time accelerating expansion of the universe.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we discussed B-I cosmological models with perfect fluid in a modified theory of gravity. In order to find solutions of the modified field equations, we assumed that σ / θ is a suitable function of the scale factor a; while exploring this case, we found that the model begins with a big bang. The model is initially decelerating, and then switches to acceleration later on.
The key findings of the model are listed below:
  • It is observed that the projected variation law for the expansion anisotropy σ / θ imparts an alternate approach to obtain the exact solutions of the field equations. It may eliminate earlier inconsistencies of the models obtained by assuming σ / θ to be constant.
  • It is noted that the Hubble parameter is a decreasing function of time t and tends to zero.
  • The deceleration parameter changes from positive early on to negative later on, i.e., a change from early deceleration to late-time acceleration. The deceleration parameter lies between −1 and 2 in our model.
  • The energy density of the cosmic fluid remains positive throughout the cosmic expansion. Nevertheless, the cosmic pressure is positive early on and negative at late times. The present accelerated expansion of the universe could be due to these negative values.
  • The equation of the state parameter also supports the observational data. The outcomes from our model concur with the modern observational data. We hope to report on the observational constraints at a later stage. The proposed model extends a beneficial benchmark in the analysis of B-I cosmological models with perfect fluid in a modified theory of gravity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.K.S. and R.K.T.; methodology, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; software, B.K.S.; validation, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; formal analysis, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; investigation, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; resources, B.K.S. and R.K.T.; data curation, B.K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.K.S. and R.K.T.; writing—review and editing, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; visualization, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; supervision, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B.; project administration, B.K.S., R.K.T. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.; Knop, R.A.; Nugent, P.G.; Castro, P.G.; Deustua, S.; Fabbro, S.; Goobar, A.; Groom, D.E.; et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999, 517, 565–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Riess, A.G.; Filippenko, A.V.; Challis, P.; Clocchiatti, A.; Diercks, A.; Garnavich, P.M.; Gilliland, R.L.; Hogan, C.J.; Jha, S.; Kirshner, R.P.; et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1009–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Percival, W.J.; Baugh, C.M.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Bridges, T.; Cannon, R.; Cole, S.; Colless, M.; Collins, C.; Couch, W.; Dalton, G.; et al. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The power spectrum and the matter content of the universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2001, 327, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stern, D.; Jimenez, R.; Verde, L.; Kamionkowski, M.; Stanford, S.A. Cosmic chronometers: Constraining the equation of state of dark energy. I: H(z) measurements. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010, 1002, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spergel, D.N.; Verde, L.; Peiris, H.V.; Komatsu, E.; Nolta, M.R.; Bennett, C.L.; Halpern, M.; Hinshaw, G.; Jarosik, N.; Kogut, A.; et al. First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003, 148, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S.; et al. Planck 2018 results VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenstein, D.J.; Zehavi, I.; Hogg, D.W.; Scoccimarro, R.; Blanton, M.R.; Nicho, R.C.; Scranton, R.; Seo, H.; Tegmark, M.; Zheng, Z.; et al. Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2005, 633, 560–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harko, T.; Lobo, F.S.N.; Nokiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. f(R,T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 024020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harko, T. Thermodynamic interpretation of the generalized gravity models with geometry-matter coupling. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 044067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Perez, A.; Sudarsky, D. Dark energy as the weight of violating energy conservation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 118, 021102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tiwari, R.K.; Beesham, A. Anisotropic model with decaying cosmological term. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2018, 363, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, J.P.; Baghel, P.S. Bulk viscous Bianchi type-V cosmological models with decaying cosmological term Λ. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2010, 49, 2734–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shukla, B.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Beesham, A. Bianchi Type-I Universe in Modified Theory of Gravity. Phys. Sci. Forum 2023, 7, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2023-14049

AMA Style

Shukla BK, Tiwari RK, Beesham A. Bianchi Type-I Universe in Modified Theory of Gravity. Physical Sciences Forum. 2023; 7(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2023-14049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shukla, Bhupendra Kumar, Rishi Kumar Tiwari, and Aroonkumar Beesham. 2023. "Bianchi Type-I Universe in Modified Theory of Gravity" Physical Sciences Forum 7, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECU2023-14049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop