Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of an Organically Modified Clinoptilolite (OMC) and a Multi-Component Mycotoxin Detoxifying Agent (MMDA) on Survival, Growth, Feed Utilization and Disease Resistance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fingerlings Fed with Low Aflatoxin
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Different Culture Methods on Growth and Survival of the Snout Otter Clam, Lutraria philippinarum, in Bai Tu Long Bay, Vietnam
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Aquaculture Journal
Volume 3
Issue 1
10.3390/aquacj3010006
aquacj-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inulin Supplementation in Diets for Tropical Gar (Atractosteus tropicus) Larvae: Effects on Growth, Survival, and Digestive and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

by
Eduardo De La Cruz-Marín
1,
Rafael Martínez-García
1,
Jenny F. López-Hernández
1,
Otilio Méndez-Marín
1,
Susana C. De la Rosa-García
1,
Emyr S. Peña-Marín
2,
Dariel Tovar-Ramírez
3,
Cesar A. Sepúlveda-Quiroz
1,
Graciela M. Pérez-Jiménez
1,
Luis D. Jiménez-Martínez
4,
Gloria G. Asencio-Alcudia
1,* and
Carlos A. Álvarez-González
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Fisiología y Recursos Acuáticos (LAFIRA), División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa 86039, Mexico
2
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Ensenada 21100, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Fisiología Comparada y Genómica Funcional, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz 23096, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, División Académica Multidisciplinaria de Jalpa de Méndez, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Jalpa de Méndez 86205, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aquac. J. 2023, 3(1), 43-55; https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj3010006
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feeding Habits and Digestive Physiology of Aquaculture Fishes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effect of adding inulin to balanced diets for tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) larvae on growth, survival, digestive enzyme activity, and antioxidant activity was evaluated. The diets were supplemented with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% inulin in addition to a control diet (0% inulin). A total of 1800 larvae of A. tropicus distributed in 18 tanks were used; the larvae were fed five times a day (8:00, 11:00, 13:00, 15:00, and 18:00) with Artemia nauplii from the absorption of the yolk (from 3–7 days after hatching, DAH) up to 10 DAH, which was mixed with the experimental feeds from 8–11 DAH (co-feeding) and exclusively with the balanced diets from 12 DAH to 21 DAH. Larvae fed the control diet (0% inulin) had the highest growth in weight and length, followed by fish fed the 2.5 and 2.0% inulin inclusions. However, survival showed that the fish fed with the inclusion of 2.5% inulin had the highest percentage (34.7%) compared to the rest of the treatments. On the other hand, the highest digestive enzymatic activities (acid and alkaline proteases, amylase, and lipase) were recorded in the larvae fed with 2 and 2.5% inulin. Likewise, catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were higher in larvae fed the control diet with 0% inulin. Supplementation of 2.0% to 2.5% inulin in the diet is recommended for A. tropicus larvae as it improves survival and digestive enzyme activity during this early stage of life.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture worldwide represents constant expansion due to its profitability and economic potential [1]. Therefore, the feeding of cultivated species is of great importance since it determines health conditions, their response to diseases, and their survival [2]. In this regard, when the feed is not appropriate and the culture conditions are poor, various infectious diseases can appear in aquatic organisms, which is a severe problem in the aquaculture industry since it increases costs and can cause significant production losses. This is why different kinds of methods have been sought to counteract this damage [3] and prebiotics and probiotics have been implemented as an alternative to improve resistance to diseases, reduce mortality, and improve survival. Prebiotics are functional carbohydrates that are not digested by the body but are considered beneficial for health due to their biological properties [4,5,6]. They are considered natural food additives, and their incorporation into the diet does not require indications [7,8]. These additives can potentially increase feed efficiency, health response, and sustainability in aquaculture [9,10]. Additionally, they can be easily obtained since they are found in natural components such as milk, honey, fruits, and vegetables, among others [11,12].
One of the more promising prebiotics for aquaculture is inulin, which is an oligosaccharide formed by fructans linked to linear β (2-1) bonds which are present in a variety of plants and foods, such as garlic, onion, agave, and artichoke, among others [13,14,15,16,17]. This additive has been shown to positively affect growth and/or innate immune response, promote resistance to stress factors and diseases, and increase antioxidant capacity [18,19]. In this aspect, inulin and fructooligosaccharide supplemented in the diets of juveniles of great sturgeon (Huso huso), large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea), red pacú (Piaractus brachypomus) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) have been evaluated. Doses from 0.4% to 2% improved growth, survival, blood serum enzymes, and gut microbiota [20,21,22,23]. On the other hand, in southeastern Mexico, the tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) is one of the most important native freshwater fish species. This species has economic importance in the region [24] and it has been studied for more than 30 years, which has allowed it to close its farming cycle. Production is currently registered at the regional level. In this way, the study of this species has allowed us to know its biology, reproduction, and genetics [25,26]. Likewise, various studies have been carried out on their nutrition and aspects of digestive physiology [27,28,29,30], cannibalism during larviculture [31], and some studies related to the use of pre and probiotics in juveniles of A. tropicus [32,33,34]. However, for the larval period, only mannan oligosaccharides in balanced diets have been reported with promising results [35]. In this study, we evaluated the supplementation of inulin in diets for A. tropicus larvae on growth, survival, and digestive and antioxidant enzymatic activities during their culture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reproduction and Larviculture

The organisms were obtained from a spawning induced in a female A. tropicus through an intramuscular injection of luteinizing-releasing hormone (LHRHa 30 µg kg fish−1 under the pelvic fin), accompanied by 3 males for the fertilization of the eggs [34]. Once the eleutheroembryos were obtained, they were kept at the facilities of the Laboratory of Physiology in Aquatic Resources (LAFIRA) of the Academic Division of Biological Sciences of the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (DACBiol-UJAT), in a recirculation system with 18 circular tanks of 100 L each to start the feeding trial. Larvae hatched on the 3rd day postfertilization and feeding started from yolk absorption (3 days after hatching, DAH).

2.2. Experimental Design

Six experimental treatments were evaluated using different percentages of inulin inclusion in the microparticulate food (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% inulin) and a control diet (0% inulin) carried out in triplicate. A total of 1800 A. tropicus larvae were distributed in 18 tanks with 100 larvae per tank. The tanks were connected to a recirculation system with a sand filter and 1 HP water pump connected to a 1500 L reservoir with a biological filter. The larvae were fed 5 times a day (8:00, 11:00, 13:00, 15:00, and 18:00 h) with Artemia nauplii from yolk absorption (3 DAH) until 10 DAH. The co-feeding and mixing of Artemia nauplii (from 20 to 50 nauplii per larvae daily) with the experimental dry feeds started from 8 DAH and they were exclusively fed with the balanced diets from 12 DAH to 21 DAH. During the experiment, the tanks were cleaned by siphoning twice a day, 1 hour after the first and last feeding. Likewise, daily monitoring of temperature (31.5 ± 0.6 °C), dissolved oxygen (4.5 ± 0.1 mg L−1), and pH (7.3 ± 0.2) was carried out using an oximeter (YSI 85, USA) and a pH meter (HANNA HI 99100, Romania), respectively.

2.3. Formulation and Preparation for Experimental Diets

Diet formulation for A. tropicus larvae was carried out according to the protocol of Frías-Quintana et al. [29]. Some modifications were made according to the nutrients used and the percentages of inulin added by adjusting the different concentrations of inulin with sorghum flour (Table 1). The diets were prepared using an industrial mixer (CRT Global brand). Dry ingredients were sieved to the same size and added; first, the macronutrients were mixed for 10 min, then the micronutrients (vitamin, mineral, and vitamin C premix) were added, and mixing was continued for another 10 min. Afterward, the liquid ingredients (fish oil and soy lecithin) were added and they were allowed to mix for 15 min. Finally, water (approximately 400 mL kg diet−1) was added. When the mixture was obtained, it was placed in a mill (TOR-REY brand) to obtain pellets with a 5 mm mesh. After the pellets were obtained, they were dried in an oven (San-Son brand) at 50 °C for 8 h [34]. When the food was prepared, it was crushed with a manual mill and sieved through a sieve according to the size of the larva’s mouth.

2.4. Growth and Survival Rates

Since the beginning of the trial, samplings were carried out to determine the growth every 7 days from 30% of the population of each tank, where the data of the individual weight (g) were recorded using an analytical balance (Ohaius HH120) and the total length (cm), respectively, by photography to be later analyzed using Image J 1.51j8 software. Additionally, at the end of the bioassay, the absolute weight gain (AWG) was calculated: final weight (g) − initial weight (g) × 100, and survival (S) (final number of fish/initial number of fish) × 100.

2.5. Sampling

At the end of the nutritional trial (21 DAH), 6 individuals per experimental unit were sampled (3 individuals for digestive and 3 individuals for antioxidant analysis), which were previously starved for a period of 24 h and euthanized with an overdose of clove oil (1 mL L−1). For enzymatic analyses, the head and tail were dissected to extract the digestive systems (stomach and intestine), which were individually preserved in an ultra-freezer at −80 °C.

2.6. Digestive Enzyme Activity

Digestive system samples were macerated in pull (n = 3 individuals per experimental unit) with 100 mM L−1 of glycine-HCl pH 2 for the analysis of stomach proteases and 50 mM L−1 of Tris-HCl + 12.5 mM L−1 CaCl2 pH 7.5 for the analysis of intestinal proteases. Samples were centrifuged at 16,000 g at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at −80 °C. For this study, each biological sample was measured in triplicate. Soluble protein quantification was performed using the Bradford technique [36]. For the evaluation of the activity of acid proteases (stomach) the method of Anson [37] was used, using 0.25% hemoglobin as a substrate solubilized in 100 mM L−1 of glycine-HCl at pH 2. Alkaline (intestinal) proteases measurement, 0.25% casein were solubilized in 50 mM L−1 of Tris-Cl and 10 mM L−1 of CaCl2 pH 9.0 was used [38]. The procedure for both techniques was continued, incubating them at 37 °C and stopping the reaction with 0.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid, which was then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The absorbance was read at 280 nm. The lipase activity was measured with the intestinal extracts following the method of Versaw et al. [39], for which 100 mM L−1 of sodium taurocholate, 50 mM L−1 of Tris-HCl pH 7.5, and 100 mM L−1 of β-naphthyl acetate were used as substrates. The extract was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and the reaction was quenched with 0.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid and ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v); absorbance was read at 540 nm. The α-amylase activity was measured with the intestinal extracts employing the Robyt and Whelan [40] technique and the substrate used was 2% starch in a 0.05 M L−1 NaCl sodium citrate buffer at pH 7.5. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 50 min and activity was quantified at 600 nm. All data obtained are shown as U mg protein−1 according to the following equations: units by mL (U mL−1) = [Δabs × final reaction volume (mL)] [ε × time (min) × extract volume (mL)]−1; specific activity (U mg protein−1) = U mL × mg of soluble protein−1, where “ε” represents the molar extinction coefficient.

2.7. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Intestinal multienzyme extracts were used to measure catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) antioxidant activities. CAT, SOD, and GPX activities were performed using Cayman Chemical kits (Cat. 707002, Cat. 703102, and Cat. 706002, MI, USA), according to the supplier’s specifications. Each measurement was performed in triplicate using the following formulas: CAT activity (nmol min−1 mL−1) = [(μM of sample/20 min) × (sample dilution)]. SOD activity (U mL−1) = [(Sample LR -y-intercept/slope) 0.23 mL × 0.01 mL−1] × (sample dilution), where sample LR represent the SOD standard rate. GPX activity (nmol min−1 mL−1) = [(Δ340 × min/0.00373 μM) − 1 × (0.19 mL/0.002 mL)] × (Sample dilution). All activities were normalized using the Bradford [37] technique for soluble protein concentration.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

A one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD posteriori test were performed to analyze statistical differences between treatments for survival, absolute weight gain, and digestive and antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT), which previously fulfilled the postulates of Normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov) and homoscedasticity (Levene). Wet weight, total length, and GPx enzyme activity did not fulfill both postulates. Therefore, these variables were analyzed with non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and a posteriori Nemenyi tests. A significance value of 0.05 was used to detect statistical differences. All tests were performed with Statistica V 7.0 program.

3. Results

3.1. Growth and Survival Rates

The results showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in weight; the control diet with 0% inulin obtained the highest median value (±RI) of 0.078 ± 0.01 g, against treatments 1.0% and 1.5% inulin supplementation (0.069 ± 0.04 g and 0.068 ± 0.04 g, respectively (±RI)) (Figure 1a). The growth in total length behaved similarly to weight when detecting a high significance (p < 0.05), where the fish fed with the control diet shows similar results (2.89 ± 0.18 cm median and ±RI) to the larvae fed with the 2.5 and 2.0% inulin inclusions (2.85 ± 0.30 and 2.82 ± 0.21 cm (±RI)), respectively, while the rest of the treatments were statistically lower (Figure 1b). For weight gained, no significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between treatments (Control: 4.9011 ± 0.69%/day; 0.5% inulin: 4.0829 ± 0.54%/day; 1% inulin: 4.1529 ± 0.46%/day; 1.5% inulin: 4.2642 ± 0.54%/day; 2% inulin: 5.1907 ± 0.66%/day; and 2.5% inulin: 4.9442 ± 1.32%/day). However, survival did show significant differences (p < 0.05), where the fish fed with the inclusion of 2.5% inulin showed the highest median value (34.7 ± 5.5%) compared with larvae fed the control diet (15.1 ± 4.3%) (Figure 2).

3.2. Digestive Enzyme Activity

The larvae fed with the inclusion of 2.5% inulin showed the highest activities (p < 0.05) for acid proteases (Figure 3a) and alkaline proteases (Figure 3b), being statistically higher than the rest of the treatments. On the other hand, amylase activity (Figure 3c) was statistically higher (p < 0.05) for 2.0% and 2.5% of inulin supplementation than the rest of the treatments, and lipase activities (Figure 3d) were statistically higher (p < 0.05) for the larvae fed with 2.5% of inulin inclusion compared to the other treatments.

3.3. Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

The activity of the antioxidant enzymes CAT (Figure 4a) and SOD (Figure 4b) showed the highest values (p < 0.05) for the larvae fed with the control diet (0% inulin) compared to the treatments supplemented with inulin. On the other hand, the GPx activity did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) between the treatments (Figure 4c).

4. Discussion

This experiment showed significant differences in final weight and total length in A. tropicus larvae fed with the control diet and the highest levels of inulin (2.0 and 2.5%) compared to the lowest levels of inulin added, which show the smallest values for weight and length. These results differ from those reported in species such as carp (Cyprinus carpio), Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus), beluga (Huso huso), and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [16,41,42,43] where no positive effects on growth were detected; however, other studies have revealed positive effects on growth promoted by the inclusion of inulin, such as in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), roach (Rutilus rutilus), and O. mykiss [15,19,44,45,46,47]. These effects have been attributed to the fermentability of inulin by the action of the microbiome and changes in intestinal morphology, which changes as a function of development [41,48]. Likewise, some authors consider that the variations in growth, feed utilization, and health benefits when using this prebiotic depend mainly on the species, the time of application, and the dose of the supplement, as well as the type of prebiotic. Furthermore, in this case, the effect of inulin on the growth response seems to vary, so it is necessary to examine morphophysiological parameters to understand its effect [49,50].
On the other hand, the survival of A. tropicus larvae showed significant differences (p < 0.05), where the fish fed with the inclusion of 2.5% inulin showed the highest value. These results are similar to those results reported by various authors who found significant increases in the survival of various fish species [15,16,44,48,51,52,53]. In contrast, Akrami et al. [42] and Reza et al. [43] did not find positive effects on the survival rate of fingerlings of H. huso and O. mykiss. In addition, lower rates of food consumption, SGR, and PER were observed in the treatments with 1% and 2% inulin supplementation compared with the control diet. This suggests an inverse relationship between some of the growth indices, which leads the authors to believe that inulin is not appropriate for these species. The authors suggest that this is related to a decrease in digestive capacity by possibly exceeding the dose of the prebiotic and the low fermentability of inulin, which could affect the hydrolysis of nutrients by affecting the digestive enzymatic activity or the absorption processes of essential biomolecules.
In this regard, Olsen et al. [41] claim that the lower survival can be attributed to the inability of the intestinal microbiota to ferment the excessive levels of inulin, and the excess of inulin was detrimental to the enterocytes. Likewise, the effects of inulin on growth and survival rate vary among different species. In this regard, one of the essential roles of inulin intake is to maximize the digestibility of feed components, as previous studies suggest that this prebiotic is an excellent digestion activator since it causes a balanced growth of specific microorganisms in the posterior intestine, such as Bifidobacteria and Lacctobacilli, which contribute to the production of vitamins B1, riboflavin, B6, and K, as well as increasing the solubility and absorption of minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and iron ions. It is also known that a correct dose of the prebiotic reduces the intestinal pH and produces products derived from fermentation, such as short chains of fatty acids, which can be used as an energy source for cells [16,49,54,55,56].
In the case of digestive enzymes, A. tropicus larvae fed with the inclusion of 2.5% inulin showed the highest activities of acid, alkaline, amylase, and lipase proteases, followed by those fed with the inclusion of 2% inulin. These results are similar to those reported by Soleimani et al. [44] in R. rutilus larvae, where amylase, lipase, and protease activities showed a significant increase when adding 1% inulin compared with the control diet. Similarly, Hunt et al. [19] found an increase in intestinal trypsin, lipase, and amylase from fish fed 1% inulin in O. mykiss. However, there are studies where the inclusion of inulin did not have significant effects on trypsin-like activities, alkaline amylase phosphatase, and leucine aminopeptidase, which were carried out in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and in C. carpio larvae [16,57]. This may be related to a limited synthesis of these pancreatic digestive enzymes in contrast with the high hydrolytic capacity and rapid development of the digestive system of A. tropicus larvae [28]. Those mentioned above can be attributed to the different digestive capacities that species have depending on their stage of development and the presence of a balanced intestinal microbiome. This is why the digestive capacities of species vary enormously; the inclusion of inulin works in a complementary way to digestion processes since the fermentation of prebiotics by the intestinal microbiome can produce short-chain fatty acids, which support the digestion of nutrients. This improves the morphology of the intestine [43,48].
In other studies, it is mentioned that the bacteria found in the intestinal tract participate in the digestion of food, which is why it contributes in a complementary way to the hydrolysis of nutrients by the action of digestive enzymes in their active function. In the same way, it is mentioned that the microbiome of the digestive tract of aquatic organisms varies according to several factors, such as the aquatic environment (temperature, pH, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, salinity, among others), seasonal variation, diet, the stage of development of the species of fish, and the anatomy of the gastrointestinal section [58,59,60]. Likewise, it is mentioned that the addition of inulin in the correct proportion serves to stimulate the digestive enzyme activities by the production of a series of vitamins and enzymes. The augment in digestion efficiency leads to an increase in the intestinal mucosa [9], improving the morphology of the gut by the fermentation of inulin which stimulates the microbiomes that participate in the digestion of food [44].
In this way, the inclusion of this prebiotic helps the nutrients in the food to be easily digested and promotes better absorption of the molecules inside the cells (enterocytes) to be transported to the tissues that require them for various metabolic processes [19].
On the other hand, the activities of the antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD of the A. tropicus larvae showed the highest values for the fish fed with the control diet compared to the other treatments, which contrasts with the decrease in these activities according to the inulin ratio increases. In this sense, it is widely known that inulin improves antioxidant status through several mechanisms, such as the generation of short-chain fatty acids and antioxidant enzymes [61]. Antioxidant enzymes inhibit radical generation and prevent oxidative damage in teleost [62]. Some studies indicate that the activity of antioxidant enzymes is modulated when prebiotics, such as inulin, are included in the diet, which allows the body to prevent the formation of reactive oxidative species (ROS) [63,64]. It should be noted that cells usually produce reactive oxygen species, which is why the first antioxidant defense system is GPx, SOD, and CAT, which could indicate that our results show less antioxidant activity in treatments supplemented with inulin, unlike the control treatment. This is due to protection or inhibition of the cells to produce ROS, for which they do not need to be active, keeping the organism more stable, unlike the control treatment with the highest activity. In this sense, our results are similar to those reported by Guerreiro et al. [65], where diminished antioxidant activity in white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) was observed by including fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), which are a derivative of inulin. To fully determine the antioxidant effect of inulin inclusion in the diet, further and more in-depth analyses are needed.
Contrary to our results, Hunt et al. [19] found that inulin supplementation increases the antioxidant activity of O. mykiss, which are essential protective enzymes that trigger various factors to prevent cell deterioration from membrane oxidation. Without the protection of antioxidant enzymes, the balance of various absorption channels, such as sodium, potassium, and calcium ions in fish, is altered, in addition to the elevation of cortisol and corticosteroids, which are essential in the regulation of the pathways involved in the mobilization of energy substrates [64]. In this regard, Olsvik et al. [66] mention that the increase in the activity of some oxidative enzymes that participate in the antioxidant response, such as SOD, CAT, and GPx, can differ in response to variations in several biotic and abiotic factors that cause stress in fish, in addition to the individual physiological variation of organisms [67]. Additionally, inulin can act effectively by changing the intestinal microbiota, which generates the production of lactic acid and other substances used as energy sources for microorganisms, which improves the absorption of nutrients in the host, generates an increased synthesis of antimicrobial peptides, promotes the growth of beneficial bacteria (probiotics), reduces luminal pH, provides an enhancement of the immune system, and prevents the adhesion of pathogens [68].
An aspect to be highlighted is the increase in the absorption capacity of nutrients which generally improves the growth of fish, for which it has been hypothesized that the fermentation process in the intestinal tract by the action of the microbiome and its association with some prebiotics, such as inulin, promotes the release of short-chain fatty acids. This is also complemented by the production of other substances, such as spermine, that stimulate the proliferation of intestinal cells [69,70,71]. Various authors mention that the effects on growth when adding inulin to the diet of fish, particularly in carnivores such as A. tropicus, are not always clear. However, an increase in digestive capacity is observed which is associated with a significant contribution of some active substances by the microbiome by inulin supplementation, such as Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) [41,57,72].
Regarding the studies carried out with prebiotics in A. tropicus, it can be mentioned that the growth of larvae fed with the concentration of 7.5 g Kg−1 of FOS increased the weight and total length, as well as an increase in the digestive lipase and amylase enzyme activities [73]. When MOS was added to the balanced feed, no significant differences were found in the growth of the larvae in any of the treatments. However, a significant increase in lipase and alkaline protease activities was detected when supplementing with 5 g Kg−1 of MOS [35]. In A. tropicus, juveniles fed with MOS show an increase in growth when using 2 g Kg−1, as well as an increase in pepsin, trypsin, lipase, and α-amylase activities [32]. The addition of FOS in the diet showed an increase in the growth of juveniles with 5 g Kg−1, in addition to an increase in acid protease, chymotrypsin, leucine aminopeptidase, and lipase activities [34]. Finally, when using the prebiotic β-glucans in balanced feeds for juveniles, no differences were detected between treatments, although differences were detected in chymotrypsin activity when supplementing the diet with 10 g Kg−1 [33].

5. Conclusions

The incorporation of 25 g Kg−1 of inulin in the larvae of A. tropicus increases survival and improves the activities of acid and alkaline proteases, amylase, and lipase, so there is a greater bioavailability of nutrients. Likewise, an increase in the activity of the GPx antioxidant enzyme is observed, which favors the protection of cell membranes from the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The decrease in SOD and CAT could suggest that they play a protective role by preventing the presence of ROS; in this way, inulin supplementation can positively affect the larvae’s culture during their development and the time to make food changes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D.L.C.-M., G.G.A.-A. and C.A.Á.-G.; methodology, E.D.L.C.-M., J.F.L.-H., G.M.P.-J. and C.A.S.-Q.; formal analysis, E.D.L.C.-M., R.M.-G. and L.D.J.-M.; investigation, E.D.L.C.-M., D.T.-R. and C.A.Á.-G.; resources, C.A.Á.-G.; data curation, E.D.L.C.-M. and E.S.P.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.L.C.-M.; writing—review and editing, E.S.P.-M., G.G.A.-A., R.M.-G., S.C.D.l.R.-G., O.M.-M. and C.A.Á.-G.; visualization, G.G.A.-A., R.M.-G. and C.A.Á.-G.; supervision, G.G.A.-A. and C.A.Á.-G.; project administration, R.M.-G. and C.A.Á.-G.; funding acquisition, C.A.Á.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Council on Science and Technology (CONACYT) in Mexico, grant number CB-2016-01-282765. This study was carried out with the collaboration of Red CYTED LARVAplus (117RT0521).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (protocol code NOM-062-ZOO-1999, 22 August 2001).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) for the graduate studies grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kobayashi, M.; Msangi, S.; Batka, M.; Vannuccini, S.; Dey, M.M.; Anderson, J.L. Fish to 2030: The Role and Opportunity for Aquaculture. Aquac. Econ. Manag. 2015, 19, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oliva-Teles, A. Nutrition and health of aquaculture fish. J. Fish Dis. 2012, 35, 83–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Carbone, D.; Faggio, C. Importance of prebiotics in aquaculture as immunostimulants. Effects on immune system of Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2016, 54, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Song, S.K.; Beck, B.R.; Kim, D.; Park, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.D.; Ringø, E. Prebiotics as immunostimulants in aquaculture: A review. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2014, 40, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mussatto, S.I.; Mancilha, I.M. Non-digestible oligosaccharides: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 68, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akhter, N.; Wu, B.; Memon, A.M.; Mohsin, M. Probiotics and prebiotics associated with aquaculture: A review. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 45, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gatesoupe, F.J. Probiotics and prebiotics for fish culture, at the parting of the ways. Aqua Feed. Formul. Beyond 2005, 2, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Iwashita, M.; Addo, S.; Terhune, J.S. Use of pre- and probiotics in finfish aquaculture. In Feed and Feeding Practices in Aquaculture; Davis, D.A., Ed.; Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Woodhead Publishing: Soston, UK, 2015; pp. 35–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ringø, E.; Olsen, R.E.; Gifstad, T.Ø.; Dalmo, R.A.; Amlund, H.; Hemre, G.-I.; Bakke, A.M. Prebiotics in aquaculture: A review. Aquac. Nutr. 2010, 16, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S.J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, types, sources, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Foods 2019, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Aachary, A.A.; Prapulla, S.G. Xylooligosaccharides (XOS) as an Emerging prebiotic: Microbial synthesis, utilization, structural characterization, bioactive properties, and applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2011, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, R.; Manjunatha, S.; Kathiravan, T.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Nadanasabapathi, S.; Raju, P.S. Rheological characteristics of inulin solution at low concentrations: Effect of temperature and solid content. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5611–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kolida, S.; Tuohy, K.; Gibson, G.R. Prebiotic effects of inulin and oligofructose. Braz. J. Nutr. 2002, 87, S193–S197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meyer, D.; Stasse-Wolthuis, M. The bifidogenic effect of inulin and oligofructose and its consequences for gut health. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 1277–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ibrahem, M.D.; Fathi, M.; Mesalhy, S.; Abd El-Aty, A.M. Effect of dietary supplementation of inulin and vitamin C on the growth, hematology, innate immunity, and resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2010, 29, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Eshaghzadeh, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Vahabzadeh, H.; Ringø, E. The effects of dietary inulin on growth performance, survival and digestive enzyme activities of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fry. Aquac. Nutr. 2015, 21, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weiss, M.; Steiner, D.F.; Philipson, L.H. Insulin biosynthesis, secretion, structure, and structure-activity relationships. In EndoText; Feingold, K.R., Anawalt, B., Boyce, A., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2014. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279029/ (accessed on 9 May 2022).
  18. Mo, W.Y.; Cheng, Z.; Choi, W.M.; Lun, C.H.I.; Man, Y.B.; Wong, J.T.F.; Chen, X.W.; Lau, S.C.K.; Wong, M.H. Use of food waste as fish feeds: Effects of prebiotic fibers (inulin and mannanoligosaccharide) on growth and non-specific immunity of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 17663–17671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hunt, A.; Çetinkaya, M.; Ozkan Yılmaz, F.; Yildirim, M.; Berkoz, M.; Yalın, S. Effect of dietary supplementation of inulin on growth performance, digestion enzyme activities and antioxidant status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 7, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmdifar, E.; Akrami, R.; Ghelichi, A.; Mohammadi Zarejabad, A. Effects of different dietary prebiotic inulin levels on blood serum enzymes, hematologic, and biochemical parameters of great sturgeon (Huso huso) juveniles. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2010, 20, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ai, Q.; Xu, H.; Mai, K.; Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W. Effects of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and fructooligosaccharide on growth performance, survival, non-specific immune response and disease resistance of juvenile large yellow croaker, Larimichthys Crocea. Aquaculture 2011, 317, 155e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hosseini, S.H.; Sourinejad, I.; Ashori, S.; Moradinasab, A.A. Effect of different levels of dietary inulin supplementation on growth performance, survival and some hematologic indices in Red Pacu Piaractus brachypomus fry. J. Aquat. Ecol. 2014, 4, 50–44. Available online: http://jae.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-38-en.html (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  23. Mousavi, E.; Mohammadiazarm, H.; Seied Mohammad Mousavi, M.S.; Ghatrami, R.E. Effects of inulin, savory and onion powders in diet of juveniles carp Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus 1758) on gut micro flora, immune response and blood biochemical parameters. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 16, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Márquez-Couturier, G.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Contreras, W.; Hernández, U.; Hernández, A.; Mendoza, R.; Aguilera, C.; García, T.; Civera, R.; Goytortua, E. Avances en la alimentación y nutrición de pejelagarto Atractosteus tropicus. In Memorias del VIII Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola; Cruz Suárez, L.E., Ricque Marie, D., Tapia Salazar, M., Nieto López, M.G., Villarreal Cavazos, D.A., Puello Cruz, A.C., García Ortega, A., Eds.; UANL: Monterrey, México, 2006; pp. 446–523. Available online: https://www.uanl.mx/utilerias/nutricion_acuicola/VIII/archivos/28Alvarez.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  25. Márquez-Couturier, G.; Vázquez-Navarrete, C.J. Empoderamiento de las organizaciones sociales en el cultivo de pejelagarto (Atractosteus tropicus) en el sureste de Mexico. Agroproductividad 2015, 8, 36–43. Available online: https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Agroproductividad/2015/vol8/no3/7.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  26. Márquez-Couturier, G.; Vázquez-Navarrete, C.J. Estado del arte de la biología y cultivo de pejelagarto (Atractosteus tropicus). Agroproductividad 2015, 8, 44–51. Available online: https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Agroproductividad/2015/vol8/no3/8.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  27. Guerrero-Zarate, R.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Olvera-Novoa, M.A.; Perales-García, N.; Frías-Quintana, C.A.; Martínez-García, R.; Contreras-Sanchez, W.M. Partial characterization of digestive proteases in tropical gar Atractosteus tropicus juveniles. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 40, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Frías-Quintana, C.A.; Márquez-Couturier, G.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Nolasco-Soria, H.; Galaviz-Espinosa, M.A.; Martínez-García, R.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Martínez-Yáñez, R.; Gisbert, E. Development of digestive tract and enzyme activities during the early ontogeny of the tropical gar Atractosteus tropicus. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 41, 1075–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Frías-Quintana, C.A.; Domínguez-Lorenzo, J.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Martínez-García, R. Using cornstarch in microparticulate diets for larvicultured tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 42, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Frías-Quintana, C.A.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Martínez-García, R.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Galaviz, M. Use of potato starch in diets of tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus, Gill 1863) larvae. Fishes 2017, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Palma-Cancino, D.J.; Martínez-García, R.; Alvarez-González, C.A.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Peña-Marín, E.S. Esquemas de alimentación para larvicultura de pejelagarto (Atractosteus tropicus Gill): Crecimiento, supervivencia y canibalismo. Ecosistemas Y Recur. Agropecu. 2019, 6, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nájera-Arzola, I.C.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Frías-Quintana, C.A.; Peña, E.; Martínez-García, R.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Méndez-Marín, O.; Gisbert, E. Evaluación de oligosacáridos de manano (MOS) en dietas balanceadas para juveniles de pejelagarto (Atractosteus tropicus). Hidrobiológica 2018, 28, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nieves-Rodríguez, K.N.; Álvarez-González, C.A.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Vega-Villasante, F.; Martínez-García, R.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Guzmán-Villanueva, L.T.; Andree, K.; Gisbert, E. Effect of β-glucans in diets on growth, survival, digestive enzyme activity, and immune system and intestinal barrier gene expression for tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) juveniles. Fishes 2018, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sepúlveda-Quiroz, C.A.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Pérez-Morales, A.; Martínez-García, R.; Alvarez-Villagómez, C.S.; Maytorena-Verdugo, C.I.; Camarillo-Coop, S.; Vissio, G.; Pérez Sirkin, D.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; et al. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation in diets for tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) juvenile: Effects on morphophysiology and intestinal barrier function. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maytorena-Verdugo, C.I.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Alvarez-Villagómez, C.S.; Pérez-Jiménez, G.M.; Sepúlveda-Quiroz, C.A.; Alvarez-González, C.A. Inclusion of mannan-oligosaccharides in diets for tropical gar Atractosteus tropicus larvae: Effects on growth, digestive enzymes, and expression of intestinal barrier genes. Fishes 2022, 7, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Anson, M.L. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J. Gen. Physiol. 1938, 22, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Walter, H.E. Proteinases: Methods with hemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrates. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis; Bergmeyern, H.J., Ed.; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, Germany, 1984; Volume 1, pp. 270–277. Available online: https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/9220/1/9220.pdf (accessed on 9 May 2022).
  39. Versaw, W.K.; Cuppett, S.L.; Winters, D.D.; Williams, L.E. An improved colorimetric assay for bacterial lipase in nonfat dry milk. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54, 232–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Robyt, J.F.; Whelan, W.J. General Aspects of Amylase Action, Chap. 13 cr-Amylases, Chap. 14/J-Amylases. In Starch and Its Derivatives, 4th ed.; Radley, J.A., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1968; pp. 477–497. [Google Scholar]
  41. Olsen, R.E.; Myklebust, R.; Kryvi, H.; Mayhew, T.M.; Ringø, E. Damaging effect of dietary inulin on intestinal enterocytes in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). Aquac. Res. 2001, 32, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akrami, R.; Iri, Y.; Rostami, H.K.; Mansour, M.R. Effect of dietary supplementation of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) on growth performance, survival, lactobacillus bacterial population and hemato-immunological parameters of stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) juvenile. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2013, 35, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reza, A.; Abdolmajid, H.; Abbas, M.; Abdolmohammad, A.K. Effect of Dietary Prebiotic Inulin on Growth Performance, Intestinal Microflora, Body Composition and Hematological Parameters of Juvenile Beluga, Huso huso (Linnaeus, 1758). J. World Aquac. Soc. 2009, 40, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soleimani, N.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Merrifield, D.L.; Barati, M.; Abadi, Z.H. Dietary supplementation of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) improves the innate immune response, stress resistance, digestive enzyme activities and growth performance of Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus) fry. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2012, 32, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Boonanuntanasarn, S.; Tiengtam, N.; Pitaksong, T.; Piromyou, P.; Teaumroong, N. Effects of dietary inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) on intestinal microbiota community and morphology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tiengtam, N.; Paengkoum, P.; Sirivoharn, S.; Phonsiri, K.; Boonanuntanasarn, S. The effects of dietary inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tuber on the growth performance, haematological, blood chemical and immune parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 5280–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yones, A.M.A.S.M.; Eissa, I.A.M.M.; Ghobashy, M.A.E.F.A.; Marzok, S.S. Effects of dietary inulin as prebiotic on growth performance, immuno-haematological indices and ectoparasitic infection of fingerlings Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Natl. Inst. Oceanogr. Fish. 2020, 43, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoseinifar, S.H.; Ahmadi, A.; Khalili, M.; Raeisi, M.; Van Doan, H.; Caipang, C.M. The study of antioxidant enzymes and immune-related genes expression in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings fed different prebiotics. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 5447–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tiengtam, N.; Khempaka, S.; Paengkoum, P.; Boonanuntanasarn, S. Effects of inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as prebiotic ingredients in the diet of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2015, 207, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ganguly, S.; Dora, K.C.; Sarkar, S.; Chowdhury, S. Supplementation of prebiotics in fish feed: A review. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2012, 23, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mahious, A.S.; Gatesoupe, F.J.; Hervi, M.; Metailler, R.; Ollevier, F. Effect of dietary inulin and oligosaccharides as prebiotics for weaning turbot, Psetta maxima (Linnaeus, C. 1758). Aquac. Int. 2006, 14, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sheikholeslami, M.; Yusefian, M.; Yavari, V.; Mohamadian, T.; Abhari, H.; Goran, H. Modulation of rainbow trout immune system and enhance resistance against streptococcosis using dietary inulin. In The First National Conference on Caspian Sea Fisheries Resources; Gorgan University: Gorgan, Iran, 2007; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
  53. Salze, G.; McLeana, E.; Schwarz, M.H.; Craig, S.R. Dietary mannan oligosaccharide enhances salinity tolerance and gut development of larval cobia. Aquaculture 2008, 274, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Levrat, M.A.; Rémésy, C.; Demigné, C. High propionic acid fermentations and mineral accumulation in the cecum of rats adapted to different levels of inulin. J. Nutr. 1991, 121, 1730–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Trinidad, T.P.; Wolever, T.M.S.; Tompson, L.V. Interactive effects of calcium and short-chain fatty acids on absorption in the distal colon of man. Nutr. Res. 1993, 13, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ortiz, L.T.; Rebolé, A.; Velasco, S.; Rodríguez, M.L.; Treviño, J.; Tejedor, J.L.; Alzueta, C. Effects of inulin and fructooligosaccharides on growth performance, body chemical composition and intestinal microbiota of farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Nutr. 2012, 19, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Refstie, S.; Bakke-McKellep, A.M.; Penn, M.H.; Sundby, A.; Shearer, K.D.; Krogdahl, Å. Capacity for digestive hydrolysis and amino acid absorption in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets with soybean meal or inulin with or without addition of antibiotics. Aquaculture 2006, 261, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Roberfroid, M.; Gibson, G.R.; Hoyles, L.; McCartney, A.L.; Rastall, R.; Rowland, I.; Wolvers, D.; Watzl, B.; Szajewska, H.; Stahl, B.; et al. Prebiotic effects: Metabolic and health benefits. BBr. J. Nutr. 2010, 104 (Suppl. 2), S1–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Walton, G.E.; Swann, J.R.; Gibson, G.R. Prebiotics. In The Prokaryotes; Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shoaib, M.; Shehzad, A.; Omar, M.; Rakha, A.; Raza, H.; Sharif, H.R.; Shakeel, A.; Ansari, A.; Niazi, S. Inulin: Properties, health benefits and food applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baumgärtner, S.; James, J.; Ellison, A. The supplementation of a prebiotic improves the microbial community in the gut and the skin of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 25, 101204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, W.D.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.A.; Zhou, X.Q.; Feng, L. A Comparative study on antioxidant system in fish hepatopancreas and intestine affected by choline deficiency: Different change patterns of varied antioxidant enzyme genes and nrf2 signaling factors. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rault-Nania, M.H.; Demougeot, C.; Gueux, E.; Berthelot, A.; Dzimira, S.; Rayssiguier, Y.; Rock, E.; Mazur, A. Inulin supplementation prevents high fructose diet-induced hypertension in rats. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Baldissera, M.D.; Souza, C.F.; Parmeggiani, B.; Leipnitz, G.; Verdi, C.M.; Santos, R.V.; Stefani, L.M.; Baldisserotto, B. The disturbance of antioxidant/oxidant balance in fish experimentally infected by Aeromonas caviae: Relationship with disease pathophysiology. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 122, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guerreiro, I.; Couto, A.; Machado, M.; Castro, C.; Pousão-Ferreira, P.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P. Prebiotics effect on immune and hepatic oxidative status and gut morphology of white sea bream (Diplodus sargus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 50, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Olsvik, P.A.; Kristensen, T.; Waagbø, R.; Rosseland, B.O.; Tollefsen, K.E.; Baeverfjord, G.; Berntssen, M.H. mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px) and lipid peroxidative stress in liver of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) exposer to hyperoxic water during smoltification. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 141, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Butt, R.L.; Volkoff, H. Gut microbiota and energy homeostasis in fish. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Blottiere, H.M.; Buecher, B.; Galmiche, J.-P.; Cherbut, C. Molecular analysis of the effect of short-chain fatty acids on intestinal cell proliferation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rehman, H.; Hellweg, P.; Taras, D.; Zentek, J. Effects of Dietary Inulin on the Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and Microbial ecology in broiler chickens as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nabizadeh, A. The effect of inulin on broiler chicken intestinal microflora, gut morphology, and performance. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 2012, 21, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Johnson-Henry, K.C.; Pinnell, L.J.; Waskow, A.M.; Irrazabal, T.; Martin, A.; Hausner, M.; Sherman, P.M. Short-chain fructo-oligosaccharide and inulin modulate inflammatory responses and microbial communities in Caco2-bbe cells and in a mouse model of intestinal injury. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cerezuela, R.; Cuesta, A.; Meseguer, J.; Esteban, M.A. Effects of inulin on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) innate immune parameters. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2008, 24, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Pérez-Jiménez, G.M.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Maytorena-Verdugo, C.I.; Sepúlveda-Quiroz, C.A.; Jiménez-Martínez, L.D.; De la Rosa-García, S.C.; Asencio-Alcudia, G.G.; Martínez-García, R.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Galaviz, M.A.; et al. Incorporation of fructooligosaccharides in diets influence growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, and expression of intestinal barrier function genes in tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) larvae. Fishes 2022, 7, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aquacj 03 00006 g001 550
Figure 1. Final weight (a) and total length (b) of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent medians ± RI. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Final weight (a) and total length (b) of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent medians ± RI. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Aquacj 03 00006 g001
Aquacj 03 00006 g002 550
Figure 2. Atractosteus tropicus larvae survival (%) fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Atractosteus tropicus larvae survival (%) fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Aquacj 03 00006 g002
Aquacj 03 00006 g003 550
Figure 3. Acid proteases (a), alkaline proteases (b), amylase (c), and lipase (d) enzyme activities (U mg protein−1) of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Acid proteases (a), alkaline proteases (b), amylase (c), and lipase (d) enzyme activities (U mg protein−1) of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Aquacj 03 00006 g003
Aquacj 03 00006 g004 550
Figure 4. Catalase (a), superoxide dismutase (b), and glutathione peroxidase (c) antioxidant enzymes activities of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Catalase (a), superoxide dismutase (b), and glutathione peroxidase (c) antioxidant enzymes activities of Atractosteus tropicus larvae fed with different percentages of inulin in the diet (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%). Values represent mean ± SD. Significant differences between treatments (inulin supplementation) are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05).
Aquacj 03 00006 g004
Table
Table 1. Experimental diet formulation with different percentages of inulin inclusion.
Table 1. Experimental diet formulation with different percentages of inulin inclusion.
Inulin (%)
Ingredients (g kg−1)00.51.01.52.02.5
Fish meal a297.9297.9297.9297.9297.9297.9
Poultry meal a150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0
Pork meal a150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0150.0
Starch b100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Soybean meal c100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Inulin d0.05.010.015.020.025.0
Sorghum flour c86.681.676.671.666.661.6
Fish oil a40.540.540.540.540.540.5
soy lecithin e40.040.040.040.040.040.0
Grenetin f20.020.020.020.020.020.0
Mixture Vit-Min g10.010.010.010.010.010.0
Vitamin C h5.05.05.05.05.05.0
Proximal composition g/100 g dry matter
Protein45.1144.9245.0444.8345.2545.16
Lipid15.2114.9315.1014.8214.9315.07
Ash11.9412.3512.0111.9912.2912.19
NFE 127.7427.2227.8528.3627.5327.58
a Proteínas marinas y agrícolas S.A. de C.V., Guadalajara, Jalisco, México; b MSA Industrializadora de maíz, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México; c GALMEX S.A. de C.V., Villahermosa, Tabasco, México; d Súperfoods de Occidente S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México; e Pronat Ultra, Yucatán, México; f D’gari Productos alimenticios y dietéticos relámpago, Tlalpan, EDOMEX, Mexico; g donated from Consorcio Súper S.A. de C.V., Guadalajara, Jalisco, México; h DSM Stay-C 35, Jalisco, México. 1 NFE = nitrogen-free extract: 100 − (% protein + lipids + % ash).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De La Cruz-Marín, E.; Martínez-García, R.; López-Hernández, J.F.; Méndez-Marín, O.; De la Rosa-García, S.C.; Peña-Marín, E.S.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Sepúlveda-Quiroz, C.A.; Pérez-Jiménez, G.M.; Jiménez-Martínez, L.D.; et al. Inulin Supplementation in Diets for Tropical Gar (Atractosteus tropicus) Larvae: Effects on Growth, Survival, and Digestive and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities. Aquac. J. 2023, 3, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj3010006

AMA Style

De La Cruz-Marín E, Martínez-García R, López-Hernández JF, Méndez-Marín O, De la Rosa-García SC, Peña-Marín ES, Tovar-Ramírez D, Sepúlveda-Quiroz CA, Pérez-Jiménez GM, Jiménez-Martínez LD, et al. Inulin Supplementation in Diets for Tropical Gar (Atractosteus tropicus) Larvae: Effects on Growth, Survival, and Digestive and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities. Aquaculture Journal. 2023; 3(1):43-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj3010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

De La Cruz-Marín, Eduardo, Rafael Martínez-García, Jenny F. López-Hernández, Otilio Méndez-Marín, Susana C. De la Rosa-García, Emyr S. Peña-Marín, Dariel Tovar-Ramírez, Cesar A. Sepúlveda-Quiroz, Graciela M. Pérez-Jiménez, Luis D. Jiménez-Martínez, and et al. 2023. "Inulin Supplementation in Diets for Tropical Gar (Atractosteus tropicus) Larvae: Effects on Growth, Survival, and Digestive and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities" Aquaculture Journal 3, no. 1: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj3010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop