# Use of UAV Images in 3D Modelling of Waste Material Stock-Piles in an Abandoned Mixed Sulphide Mine in Mathiatis—Cyprus

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

^{3}, approximately.

## 1. Introduction

^{3}. Based on the present investigation, the area is considered suitable for further investigation to be exploited in the future.

## 2. Geology of Cyprus (of the Study Area)

## 3. Stockpile Volume Estimation

#### 3.1. Proposed Methodology Plan

- The stockpile’s boundary was digitised by visual inspection on the point cloud.
- The points of the stockpile’s boundary combined with drillhole data were imported into the GEOVIA Surpac database to build a pseudo-3D block model (BM) The estimation parameter is the elevation Z since the z coordinate of imported data and blocks centroid is dummy (zero).
- After statistical and geostatistical analysis, estimates of elevation (here treated as a BM attribute) were calculated into each BM’s centroid using the Kriging technique.
- These elevation estimates were validated using Kriging residual statistics described analytically in Section 3.6 as proposed by [17,18]. If the Kriging validation failed, then corrections of the Block Kriging model variables were made, and the elevation estimations were repeated.
- After successful validation of Kriging, X, Y of the BM centroids along with the elevation estimated variable as Z were used as input data (points) for the bottom stockpile’s DTM.

#### 3.2. Topographic Map Creation

#### 3.3. Drillhole Data Database

#### 3.4. Statistcal—Geostatistical Analysis

#### 3.5. Block Model of the Study Area

#### 3.6. Validation of Block Model Estimates

- ${Q}_{1}$ value

- ${Q}_{2}$ value

#### 3.7. Block Model Elevation and Variance Estimates

_{2}residual statistic constraint was not met. A second Scenario II, was implemented to remove a polynomial trend (Equation (1)), as described in Section 3.4. In Scenario II, after the first estimation of Z transformed data into every block of the BM, data from drillhole NMMT_BH19 were inserted into the calculations, and the Kriging algorithm was executed again (Figure 10b). New estimates for elevation were carried out, and new errors were calculated. This procedure was continued until all drillhole data were inserted into calculations, and all errors were estimated for every step (Figure 10c–h). The drillhole data import sequence was NMMT_BH18, NMMT_BH19, NMMT_BH21, NMMT_BH22, NMMT_BH20, NMMT_BH17, as displayed in Figure 10b–h.

**Figure 10.**BM plans presenting the elevation (transformed) distribution as data from drillholes are imported into the Kriging algorithm when (

**a**) no drillholes are used, (

**b**) NMMT_BH18 is added to (

**a**,

**c**) NMMT_BH19 is added to (

**b**,

**d**) NMMT_BH21 is added to (

**c**,

**e**) NMMT_BH22 is added to (

**d**,

**f**) NMMT_BH20 is added to (

**e**,

**g**) NMMT_BH17 is added to (

**f**,

**h**) colormap legend.

_{1}and Q

_{2}constraints were met (Figure 12), the construction of the lower TF surface and the stockpile’s volume estimation was done. The Kriging variance of the final Z transformed values (Figure 10g) is presented below After the validation of Z predictions, the X, Y, and Z-predicted values of each BM’s centroid were now used as a point for the creation of the bottom stockpile’s surface. This means that the number of points that was used for the bottom stockpile’s surface is the same, with the number of the block shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11 (inside the red line).

_{1}< 0) and overestimates the error (Q

_{2}< 1), which can be enhanced by further reducing the semivariogram sill value. It was noted that the residual statistics check, although far from the mean values of the respective statistics Q

_{1}and Q

_{2}, were within the confidence level (CL) of 5%, so the selected semivariogram parameters cannot be rejected.

#### 3.8. Stockpile Volume Estimation

^{3}. The two blue lines show the traces of two sections of STK1.

## 4. Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

^{3}. The advantage of the Kriging method is that the uncertainty is also estimated. Based on the above methodology, new drillhole locations in areas of high Kriging variance can be proposed to minimise any uncertainty. It was noted that the most secure method would be to use topographic maps before placing the waste deposits, but this was not feasible due to time elapsed since the old open pit mine was abandoned.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Galanopoulos, E.; Skarpelis, N.; Argyraki, A. Supergene Alteration, Environmental Impact and Laboratory Scale Acid Water Treatment of Cyprus-Type Ore Deposits: Case Study of Mathiatis and Sha Abandoned Mines. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal.
**2018**, 19, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stylianou, M.; Gavriel, I.; Vogiatzakis, I.N.; Zorpas, A.; Agapiou, A. Native Plants for the Remediation of Abandoned Sulphide Mines in Cyprus: A Preliminary Assessment. J. Environ. Manag.
**2020**, 274, 110531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hudson-Edwards, K.A.; Edwards, S.J. Mineralogical Controls on Storage of As, Cu, Pb and Zn at the Abandoned Mathiatis Massive Sulphide Mine, Cyprus. Miner. Mag.
**2005**, 69, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stylianou, M.; Tsiftes, K.; Gavriel, I.; Kostarelos, K.; Demetriou, C.; Papaioannou, A. Environmental Impacts of Abandoned Sulphide Mines—The Example of Mathiatis Mine in Cyprus. In Proceedings of the SYMBIOSIS International Conference, Athens, Greece, 19–21 June 2014; pp. 19–21. [Google Scholar]
- Dawei, Z.; Lizhuang, Q.; Demin, Z.; Baohui, Z.; Lianglin, G. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UaV) Photogrammetry Technology for Dynamic Mining Subsidence Monitoring and Parameter Inversion: A Case Study in China. IEEE Access
**2020**, 8, 16372–16386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ren, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, W.; Hu, Z. A Review of UAV Monitoring in Mining Areas: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol.
**2019**, 6, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Erenoglu, O. Uav for 3d Morphological Mapping Applications: A Case Study of Koru Mining Site, Canakkale, NW Turkey. Teh. Vjesn.
**2021**, 28, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barba, S.; Barbarella, M.; di Benedetto, A.; Fiani, M.; Gujski, L.; Limongiello, M. Accuracy Assessment of 3d Photogrammetric Models from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Drones
**2019**, 3, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sanz-Ablanedo, E.; Chandler, J.H.; Rodríguez-Pérez, J.R.; Ordóñez, C. Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used. Remote Sens.
**2018**, 10, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiménez-Jiménez, S.I.; Ojeda-Bustamante, W.; Marcial-Pablo, M.D.J.; Enciso, J. Digital Terrain Models Generated with Low-Cost UAV Photogrammetry: Methodology and Accuracy. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf.
**2021**, 10, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yadav, S.K.; Borana, S.L. Monitoring and Temporal Study of Mining Area of Jodhpur City Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol.
**2017**, 4, 1732–1736. [Google Scholar] - Lee, S.; Choi, Y. Reviews of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Technology Trends and Its Applications in the Mining Industry. Geosyst. Eng.
**2016**, 19, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yao, H.; Qin, R.; Chen, X. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing Applications—A Review. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 11, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Park, S.; Choi, Y. Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Mining from Exploration to Reclamation: A Review. Minerals
**2020**, 10, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shahmoradi, J.; Talebi, E.; Roghanchi, P.; Hassanalian, M. A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Drone Technology in the Mining Industry. Drones
**2020**, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - GEOVIA Surpac
^{TM}. Integrated Geology, Resource Modeling, Mine Planning and Production 2022; Dassault Systèmes GEOVIA Inc.: Vélizy-Villacoublay, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] - Journel, A.G.; Huijbregts, C.J. Mining Geostatistics; Academic Press: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Kitanidis, P.K. Introduction to Geostatistics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Exadaktylos, G.; Saratsis, G. Methodology for the Estimation and Classification of White Marble Reserves. Min. Met. Explor.
**2020**, 37, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tao, Z.; Cui, X.; Sun, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, K.; Chen, H. Rock Mass Quality Prediction of Open-Pit Gold Mine Slope Based on the Kriging Interpolation Method. Geotech. Geol. Eng.
**2020**, 38, 5851–5865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nwaila, G.T.; Ghorbani, Y.; Zhang, S.E.; Tolmay, L.C.K.; Rose, D.H.; Nwaila, P.C.; Bourdeau, J.E.; Frimmel, H.E. Valorisation of Mine Waste—Part II: Resource Evaluation for Consolidated and Mineralised Mine Waste Using the Central African Copperbelt as an Example. J. Environ. Manag.
**2021**, 299, 113553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kasmaee, S.; Gholamnejad, J.; Yarahmadi, A.; Mojtahedzadeh, H. Reserve Estimation of the High Phosphorous Stockpile at the Choghart Iron Mine of Iran Using Geostatistical Modeling. Min. Sci. Technol.
**2010**, 20, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mallick, M.K.; Choudhary, B.S.; Budi, G. Geological Reserve Estimation of Limestone Deposit: A Comparative Study Between ISDW and OK. Model. Meas. Control C
**2020**, 81, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Armijo, R.; Lyon-Caen, H.; Papanastassiou, D. East-West Extension and Holocene Normal-Fault Scarps in the Hellenic Arc. Geology
**1992**, 20, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Armijo, R.; Meyer, B.; King, G.C.P.; Rigo, A.; Papanastassiou, D. Quaternary Evolution of the Corinth Rift and Its Implications for the Late Cenozoic Evolution of the Aegean. Geophys. J. Int.
**1996**, 126, 11–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lazos, I.; Sboras, S.; Chousianitis, K.; Kondopoulou, D.; Pikridas, C.; Bitharis, S.; Pavlides, S. Temporal Evolution of Crustal Rotation in the Aegean Region Based on Primary Geodetically-Derived Results and Palaeomagnetism. Acta Geod. Geophys.
**2022**, 57, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - McKenzie, D. Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc.
**1972**, 30, 109–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pichon, X.L.; Angelier, J. The Hellenic Arc and Trench System: A Key to the Neotectonic Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean Area. Tectonophysics
**1979**, 60, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reilinger, R.; McClusky, S. Nubia-Arabia-Eurasia Plate Motions and the Dynamics of Mediterranean and Middle East Tectonics. Geophys. J. Int.
**2011**, 186, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sengor, A.M.C.; Gorur, N.; Saroglu, F. Strike-Slip Faulting and Related Basin Formation in Zones of Tectonic Escape: Turkey as a Case Study. Strike-Slip Deform. Basin Form. Sediment.
**1985**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lazos, I.; Papanikolaou, I.; Sboras, S.; Foumelis, M.; Pikridas, C. Geodetic Upper Crust Deformation Based on Primary GNSS and INSAR Data in the Strymon Basin, Northern Greece—Correlation with Active Faults. Appl. Sci.
**2022**, 12, 9391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jolivet, L.; Menant, A.; Clerc, C.; Sternai, P.; Bellahsen, N.; Leroy, S.; Pik, R.; Stab, M.; Faccenna, C.; Gorini, C. Extensional Crustal Tectonics and Crust-Mantle Coupling, a View from the Geological Record. Earth Sci. Rev.
**2018**, 185, 1187–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brun, J.P.; Sokoutis, D. Core Complex Segmentation in North Aegean, A Dynamic View. Tectonics
**2018**, 37, 1797–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dewey, J.F.; Şengör, A.M.C. Aegean and Surrounding Regions: Complex Multiplate and Continuum Tectonics in a Convergent Zone. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.
**1979**, 90, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mercier, J.L.; Sorel, D.; Vergely, P.; Simeakis, K. Extensional Tectonic Regimes in the Aegean Basins during the Cenozoic. Basin Res.
**1989**, 2, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Robertson, A.H.F. Palaeozoic-Early Mesozoic Transition from Palaeotethys to Neotethys: Synthesis of Data and Interpretations from the Northern Periphery of Gondwana (Central and Western Anatolia, Aegean, Balkans and Sicily). Earth Sci. Rev.
**2022**, 230, 104000. [Google Scholar] - Robertson, A.H.F.; Dixon, J.E. Introduction: Aspects of the Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geol. Soc. Publ.
**1984**, 17, 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ring, U.; Pantazides, H. The Uplift of the Troodos Massif, Cyprus. Tectonics
**2019**, 38, 3124–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hutchinson, R.W.; Searle, D.L. Stratabound Pyrite Deposits in Cyprus and Relations to Other Sulphide Ore. Soc. Min. Geol. Jpn.
**1971**, 70, 198–205. [Google Scholar] - Randolph, A. Theory of Particulate Processes: Analysis and Techniques of Continuous Crystallization; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, H.L.; Franklin, J.M.; Gibson, H.L.; Jonasson, I.R.; Galley, A.G. Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits. In Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Isaaks, E.H.; Srivastava, M.R. Applied Geostatistics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Exadaktylos, G.; Manutsoglu, E.; Saratsis, G.; Spyridonos, E.; Mastoris, J. An Integrated Geological-Geostatistical Approach: Modeling of the Spatial Distribution of CaO/MgO Oxides in Kamari Limestone Quarry (Greece) for the Purpose of Defining the Optimum Exploration and Exploitation Strategies. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Advances in Mineral Resources Management and Environmental Geotechnology, Chania, Greece, 7–9 June 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Hristopoulos, D.T. Random Fields for Spatial Data Modeling; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cressie, N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Houston, A.N.; Otten, W.; Baveye, P.C.; Hapca, S. Adaptive-Window Indicator Kriging: A Thresholding Method for Computed Tomography Images of Porous Media. Comput. Geosci.
**2013**, 54, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Exadaktylos, G.; Stavropoulou, M.; Xiroudakis, G.; de Broissia, M.; Schwarz, H. A Spatial Estimation Model for Continuous Rock Mass Characterization from the Specific Energy of a TBM. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.
**2008**, 41, 797–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stavropoulou, M.; Exadaktylos, G.; Saratsis, G. A Combined Three-Dimensional Geological-Geostatistical-Numerical Model of Underground Excavations in Rock. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.
**2007**, 40, 213–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**South view of the abandoned open pit North Mathiatis mine (Personal photo of Papaconstantinou).

**Figure 2.**Percentage presentation of UAV application in each mining process phase [14].

**Figure 3.**Display of factors, resulting in the massive sulfide ore deposits formation [41].

**Figure 13.**Final stockpile STK1 bottom surface (

**a**) before and (

**b**) after digitising from UAV data (blue line) boundary is applied.

**Figure 14.**Final stockpile STK1 of 56,000 m

^{3}with the traces of two sections in NS and WE direction.

Constant | Value | Constant | Value |
---|---|---|---|

${a}_{0}$ | 389.8 | ${a}_{3}$ | 1.423 × 10^{−3} |

${a}_{1}$ | 0.1194 | ${a}_{4}$ | 2.540 × 10^{−3} |

${a}_{2}$ | 0 | ${a}_{5}$ | 0 |

Model | Nugget | Sill | Range (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Elevation (raw) | Gaussian | 2.6 | 58.4 | 80 |

Elevation (transformed) | Exponential | 0.06 | 6.8 | 41 |

Description | Min Value | Max Value |
---|---|---|

X | 531,900 | 532,020 |

Y | 3,870,400 | 3,870,580 |

Z | 0 | 1 |

Rotation | 0 | - |

Block Size (X, Y, Z) | 2 m × 2 m × 1 m | - |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Saratsis, G.; Xiroudakis, G.; Exadaktylos, G.; Papaconstantinou, A.; Lazos, I.
Use of UAV Images in 3D Modelling of Waste Material Stock-Piles in an Abandoned Mixed Sulphide Mine in Mathiatis—Cyprus. *Mining* **2023**, *3*, 79-95.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3010005

**AMA Style**

Saratsis G, Xiroudakis G, Exadaktylos G, Papaconstantinou A, Lazos I.
Use of UAV Images in 3D Modelling of Waste Material Stock-Piles in an Abandoned Mixed Sulphide Mine in Mathiatis—Cyprus. *Mining*. 2023; 3(1):79-95.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3010005

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Saratsis, Georgios, George Xiroudakis, George Exadaktylos, Alexandros Papaconstantinou, and Ilias Lazos.
2023. "Use of UAV Images in 3D Modelling of Waste Material Stock-Piles in an Abandoned Mixed Sulphide Mine in Mathiatis—Cyprus" *Mining* 3, no. 1: 79-95.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3010005