Next Article in Journal
Comparative Seismic Response Analysis of a Multi-Storey Building with and without Base Isolators under High Magnitude Earthquake
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Mono Sand Piles in Soft Cohesive Ground
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Effect of Bio-Char of Santa Maria Feverfew Plant on Physical Properties of Fresh Mortar †

Department of Civil Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur 10250, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th Conference on Sustainability in Civil Engineering (CSCE), Online, 3 August 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 44(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044004
Published: 22 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th Conference on Sustainability in Civil Engineering)

Abstract

:
The present study concerns the application of nano-/micro-sized fibers (bio-char of Santa Maria feverfew) in cementitious mortars. The bio-char was added @ 0, 0.05 and 0.1% by mass of cement. The addition of bio-char did not affect the setting and consistency of the mortars. The fresh density was reduced by 11%, while the followability decreased by 50%. It is concluded that the bio-char results in a light-weight cementitious material, without affecting the setting time or consistency. Bio-char produces carbon-rich materials, the use of which as building materials adds to carbon sequestration in accordance with the Sustainable Development Goals of the UNO.

1. Introduction

Pyrolysis is an endoergic method that encompasses the thermo-chemical breakdown of raw bio-mass in an inert atmosphere at high temperatures and pressures. This procedure yields different valuable products like bio-char, liquid bio-oil and fuel gases [1]. Bio-char is a light-weight, dark-colored carbon deposit. Scientists have used many different kinds of feedstock, including water hyacinth, oriental beech, corncob and many more [2,3,4]. In recent years, many researchers have added bio-char to cementitious products to enhance their performance. Gupta et al. added bio-char of sawdust at a rate 2% by mass of cement [5]. The results revealed that the addition enhanced the compressive strength and ductility of the end products. Tayyab et al. incorporated the bio-char of millet and maize in mortar [6]. The authors reported an enhancement of the fracture toughness and ductility of the specimens. This enhancement was attributed to crack bridging/branching due to the fibrous nature of the bio-char. Iftekhar et al. studied the effect of bio-chars of sugarcane bagasse and pine needles in cementitious mortars [7]. The authors reported enhanced interface shielding. Restuccia et al. used the bio-char of hazelnut shells in mortars. They reported an enhanced compressive strength, flexural strength, toughness and ductility. Ling et al. used bio-char @ 1–3% by mass of cement in mortar. Their findings revealed that a 3% bio-char content enhanced the degree of hydration [8]. Mensah et al. reported that bio-char has the capacity to enhance the mechanical and thermal properties of cementitious materials [9]. Most of the previous studies focused on the effects of bio-char on the hardened properties of the cementitious composites. Literature regarding the influence of bio-char addition on the fresh properties of cementitious materials is scarce.
The present study focusses on the addition of the bio-char of Santa Maria feverfew on the fresh characteristics of cementitious mortar. Santa Maria feverfew is a local plant known as gajjar boti. The use of the Santa Maria plant for producing bio-char and that of its bio-char as filler in mortar has not been studied previously. This study comprises of an evaluation of the cementitious mortar in terms of its fresh density, consistency, setting time and flowability.

2. Materials and Methods

Cementitious mortars containing both the control and the specimens with added bio-char were prepared. A C-53-grade local ordinary Portland cement was used (Table 1). River sand was used as a fine aggregate (Table 1). The transformation of the Santa Maria Feverfew plant from a raw product to pyroletic powder is shown in Figure 1. Three types of specimens were prepared: a control and those containing 0.05% and 0.1% bio-char as the mass of cement. The composition of the materials is presented in Table 2.
The materials were mixed as per the ASTM C305-20 standard method [10]. To avoid agglomeration, the bio-char was mixed in water via the UV–sonication technique. An admixture (super-plasticizer) was added (1% by mass of cement) to make the dispersion more effective. All the ingredients were mixed in a Hobart mixer. After mixing, the samples were cast in prisms (40 × 40 × 160 mm) according to the ASTM C1314 method [11]. After 24 h, the specimens were de-molded and immersed in water for curing. The flowability was measured through a flow table test (ASTM C1437) [12]. The consistency of the mix was determined using a Vicat apparatus (ASTM C187) [13]. The fresh density of the specimens was determined using the ASTM C138/138M method [14]. The mixing machine, molding and flowability test are shown in Figure 2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Setting Time

The initial setting times are presented in Table 3. The results show that there is a slight increase in the setting time, yet it is well within the limit, i.e., 30–45 min. The results show that the addition of 0.05–0.1% of the bio-char of Santa Maria Feverfew does not affect the initial setting time; the slight enhancement may be the result of the porous nature of the particles, which absorb water, thus delaying hydration. The final setting times are presented in Table 3. There is an almost negligible effect on the final setting time. Hence, the bio-char particles do not affect the setting time of the paste. The filler particles absorb water and, as such, may affect the hydration as well as the setting time, which is dependent on the water [15].

3.2. Consistency

The effect of the bio-char on the consistency of the cement paste is shown in Table 3. Consistency is an important measure, as it provides an indication of the amount of water for cement hydration. The slight enhancement may be the result of the porous nature of the bio-char. Since bio-chars are porous, they may absorb water and enhance the water requirements, but again, this enhancement is within the limits (25–30%).

3.3. Fresh Density

The fresh density of the mortar specimens is shown in Table 4. The results show that the density reduces with the addition of the bio-char.
The addition of bio-char enhances the volume of the mix. Since bio-chars are extremely light materials, the increase in mass is small as compared to the increase in volume. This, in turn, reduces the density. These results are in accordance with the previous literature [6,7].

3.4. Flowability

Flowability was assessed through a flow table test. The results are shown in Table 5.
The results show that the flowability drastically decreases with the addition of bio-char. The absorption of moisture by the bio-char particles reduces the flow. Bio-char particles are finer than cement. Finer particles enhance the specific area of the particles and, hence, lessen the amount of water for the lubrication of the mix. Therefore, there is a substantial reduction in flow. This situation demands the use of a larger amount of superplasticizer to maintain the flow. In the present study, the superplasticizer was mainly introduced for the dispersion of the bio-char particles. Owing to their nano-size, the particles become agglomerated.
The use of bio-char for the enhancement of the properties of cementitious products in a hardened form has been documented by many researchers. The present work explored the effects of bio-char on the fresh properties of cementitious materials. The results revealed that the bio-chars can be used as admixtures for reducing fresh density, with no effect on the setting time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; methodology, W.N.K. and S.G.H.K.; validation, W.N.K. and S.G.H.K.; formal analysis, W.N.K. and S.G.H.K.; investigation, W.N.K. and S.G.H.K.; resources, A.K.; data curation, W.N.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, A.K.; visualization, S.G.H.K.; supervision, A.K.; project administration, A.K.; funding acquisition, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from Higher Education Commission of Pakistan through NRPU-7984 project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khitab, A.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, R.A.; Arshad, M.T.; Anwar, W.; Tariq, J.; Khan, A.S.R.; Khan, R.B.N.; Jalil, A.; Tariq, Z. Production of Biochar and Its Potential Application in Cementitious Composites. Crystals 2021, 11, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carnaje, N.P.; Talagon, R.B.; Peralta, J.P.; Shah, K.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Development and characterisation of charcoal briquettes from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)-molasses blend. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aburas, H.; Demirbas, A. Evaluation of beech for production of bio-char, bio-oil and gaseous materials. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2015, 94, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gupta, G.K.; Ram, M.; Bala, R.; Kapur, M.; Mondal, M.K. Pyrolysis of chemically treated corncob for biochar production and its application in Cr(VI) removal. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 1606–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gupta, S.; Kua, H.W.; Low, C.Y. Use of biochar as carbon sequestering additive in cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 87, 110–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tayyab, S.; Khitab, A.; Iftikhar, A.; Khan, R.B.N.; Kirgiz, M.S. Manufacturing of high-performance light-weight mortar through addition of biochars of millet and maize. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2023, 5, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iftikhar, A.; Arsalan Khushnood, R.; Khitab, A.; Ahmad, S. Improved fracture response and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of cementitious composites incorporating pyrolytic bagasse fibers and pine needles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 370, 130722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ling, Y.; Wu, X.; Tan, K.; Zou, Z. Effect of Biochar Dosage and Fineness on the Mechanical Properties and Durability of Concrete. Materials 2023, 16, 2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mensah, R.; Shanmugam, V.; Narayanan, S.; Razavi, N.; Ulfberg, A.; Blanksvärd, T.; Sayahi, F.; Simonsson, P.; Reinke, B.; Försth, M.; et al. Biochar-Added Cementitious Materials—A Review on Mechanical, Thermal, and Environmental Properties. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. ASTM C305; Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
  11. ASTM C1314-21; Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  12. A14STM C37-20; Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  13. ASTM C187-16; Standard Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
  14. ASTM C138/C138M; Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  15. Elyamany, H.E.; Abd Elmoaty, A.E.M.; Mohamed, B. Effect of filler types on physical, mechanical and microstructure of self compacting concrete and Flow-able concrete. Alex. Eng. J. 2014, 53, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Fresh Santa Maria Feverfew plant. (b) Dry plant. (c) Bio-char. (d) Powdered bio-char.
Figure 1. (a) Fresh Santa Maria Feverfew plant. (b) Dry plant. (c) Bio-char. (d) Powdered bio-char.
Engproc 44 00004 g001
Figure 2. (a) Mixing, (b) molding and (c) flowability test.
Figure 2. (a) Mixing, (b) molding and (c) flowability test.
Engproc 44 00004 g002
Table 1. Chemical and physical characteristics of the ingredients of the mortar.
Table 1. Chemical and physical characteristics of the ingredients of the mortar.
CementSand
Compound%AgePropertyValuePropertyValue
CaO61Specific gravity3.1Specific gravity2.7
SiO221Soundness2%Fineness modulus2.7
Fe2O33Fineness1%Bulk density (Kg/m3)1480
Al2O36Initial setting time30 minDry-rodded bulk density(Kg/m3)1820
MgO1.5Final setting time610 minWater absorption(%)3.9
Alkalis0.5Consistency24%Water Content (%)1.98
Gypsum4
Table 2. Composition of the mortar.
Table 2. Composition of the mortar.
SamplesOPC (g)Sand (g)Water (mL)Bio-Char (g)Admixture (mL)W/C
C0610916214060.35
C0.056109162140.30560.35
C0.16109162140.6160.35
Table 3. Effects of bio-char on the setting time and consistency of cement paste.
Table 3. Effects of bio-char on the setting time and consistency of cement paste.
SpecimenInitial Setting Time (min)Final Setting Time (min)Consistency (%)
C033.4849523.5
C0.0535.3248523.7
C0.139.3050024.0
Table 4. Effect of bio-char on fresh density.
Table 4. Effect of bio-char on fresh density.
SpecimenDensity (kg/m3)% Difference
C02100
C0.0520004.8
C0.1188010.5
Table 5. Effect of bio-char on flowability.
Table 5. Effect of bio-char on flowability.
SpecimenD1 (mm)D2 (mm)D3 (mm)Mean D (mm)% Difference
C09.710.110.210
C0.055.15.45.75.446
C0.14.94.844.654
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nasir Khan, W.; Kazmi, S.G.H.; Khitab, A. Effect of Bio-Char of Santa Maria Feverfew Plant on Physical Properties of Fresh Mortar. Eng. Proc. 2023, 44, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044004

AMA Style

Nasir Khan W, Kazmi SGH, Khitab A. Effect of Bio-Char of Santa Maria Feverfew Plant on Physical Properties of Fresh Mortar. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 44(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nasir Khan, Waleed, Syed Ghayyoor Hussain Kazmi, and Anwar Khitab. 2023. "Effect of Bio-Char of Santa Maria Feverfew Plant on Physical Properties of Fresh Mortar" Engineering Proceedings 44, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop