Next Article in Journal
Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant Recipients
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19-Associated Lung Fibrosis: Two Pathways and Two Phenotypes, Lung Transplantation, and Antifibrotics
Previous Article in Journal
Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients
Previous Article in Special Issue
COVID-19: Impact on Lung Transplant Activity at a Large Brazilian Hospital
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Transplantology
Volume 3
Issue 2
10.3390/transplantology3020021
transplantology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Unvaccinated Liver- and Kidney-Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience of 103 Consecutive Cases

by
Hailey Hardgrave
1,2,
Allison Wells
2,3,
Joseph Nigh
2,3,
Tamara Osborn
2,
Garrett Klutts
2,
Derek Krinock
2,
Mary Katherine Rude
4,
Sushma Bhusal
5,
Lyle Burdine
2,3 and
Emmanouil Giorgakis
2,3,*
1
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
2
Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
3
Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
4
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
5
Division of Nephrology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Transplantology 2022, 3(2), 200-207; https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology3020021
Submission received: 13 April 2022 / Revised: 31 May 2022 / Accepted: 10 June 2022 / Published: 16 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solid Organ Transplantation in the Era of COVID-19)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Its reported impact on solid-organ-transplant-recipient morbidity and mortality has varied. The aim of this study was to present the effect of transplant status, patient comorbidities and immunosuppression modality on the survival of solid-organ-transplant recipients who contracted SAR-CoV-2 during the pre-vaccination era, at a single academic transplant center. Patients (n = 103) were assessed for 90-day mortality. A univariate analysis identified an age of over 60 years (HR = 10, p = 0.0034), Belatacept (HR = 6.1, p = 0.022), and Cyclosporine (HR = 6.1, p = 0.0089) as significant mortality risk factors; Tacrolimus was protective (HR = 0.23, p = 0.022). Common metabolic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, obesity) did not stand out as risk factors in our patient cohort. This study on the unvaccinated is expected to facilitate a paired comparison of outcomes in transplanted patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the latter period of the pandemic, when broad SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and novel antibody treatments became broadly available.

1. Introduction

In January 2020, a novel coronavirus now known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in Wuhan City, China [1]. The World Health Organization announced SARS-CoV-2 as a Public Health Emergency Concern and declared the viral outbreak a pandemic in March 2020 [2]. Exactly two years since, the U.S. has had more than 79 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases and almost one million fatalities [3]. During the same period, over 452 million cases and 6 million SARS-CoV-2-related deaths have been reported globally [4].
As has been previously discussed by this research group and others, individuals that have received liver and kidney transplants are at a significantly heightened risk for morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the general population [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Liver- and kidney-transplant recipients have higher rates of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, which have all been identified as risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 complications in early reports at our institution and by others [6,8,11,15,16,17,18]. Early anecdotal experience [8] and later reports have reported a higher mortality risk among kidney-transplant recipients following SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the liver-transplant recipients [19], with both groups having higher hospitalization and intensive-care-unit-admission rates. These early observations were debated in the later periods of the pandemic. This perhaps reflects the higher quality of care and closer surveillance of the transplant patients compared to the general population as well as the better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and effective treatments as the pandemic evolved, among other reasons [6,7,9,11,12,14,15,17,20,21].
Despite the plethora of published reports, the role of immunosuppression in SARS-CoV-2 severity in post-transplant patients remains unclear: Standard immunosuppression could potentially suppress the immune system’s capacity to mount a sufficient response to neutralize the viral insult, modulate systemic inflammatory storm, or suppress viral replication [5,6,9,11,13,15,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. By convention, most transplant clinicians modify the maintenance of immunosuppression in transplant patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, frequently by decreasing or even discontinuing antimetabolites [6,12,13,15,23,24,27]. The international society for heart and lung transplantation has officially recommended consideration for using mycophenolate mofetil, mTOR inhibitors, and azathioprine in transplant patients with moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 [28]. Virus-targeted immunotherapies, i.e., monoclonal antibodies (MABs) and convalescent plasma have emerged as potential treatments. Studies have reported a decrease in hospitalization need and mortality rates following the use of MABs in high-risk groups, such as the immunocompromised transplant recipients [29,30,31].
This study aimed to study the SARS-CoV-2-specific mortality and associated risk factors of a cohort of 103 consecutive unvaccinated solid-organ-transplant recipients that were transplanted at a single academic transplant center, using a prospectively populated institutional SARS-CoV-2 transplant registry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Inclusion

At the onset of the pandemic, we sought to build and populate a registry of all transplant recipients who contracted the disease, after obtaining Institutional Review Board exemption [8]. The study included all consecutive adult solid-organ-transplant recipients 18 years of age or above who had previously received a solid-organ transplant in our institution (liver, kidney or both) and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 February 2020 and 18 February 2021. Subjects were included regardless of the elapsed time between transplantation and the positive SARS-CoV-2 test. All patients had functioning grafts at the time of enrollment. A positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was determined via either a positive polymerase chain reaction or a positive antigen test [9]. The subjects were either completely unvaccinated or less than 2 weeks from their last vaccination.

2.2. Database Creation

As already described in our preliminary reports, an institutional Research Electronic Data Capture database was created, populated by all consecutive eligible de-identified subjects [8,18]. The collected data included patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, transplant details, immunosuppression regimen, and SARS-CoV-2-specific treatment and outcomes [8,18]. Patients were followed for a 90-day period from the time of diagnosis [8,18].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Subjects were divided into groups of survivors and fatalities at the end of the 90-day follow-up period. Categorical variables were reported as the number and percentage of the total group (%) and compared using the Fisher’s exact test [32,33]. Continuous variables were reported as a median and interquartile range (lower quartile, upper quartile) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test [8,32,33]. A univariate Cox regression model was performed on the above-discussed variables and a Kaplan–Meier survival curve was constructed by age group [32].

3. Results

A total of 103 patients were enrolled, with 76 kidney-transplants recipients, 23 liver-transplant recipients, and 4 simultaneous liver–kidney-transplant (SLK) patients. There was a total of 10 90-day mortalities and 93 surviving patients. Patient demographic information, transplant type, comorbidities, and immunosuppression-regimen descriptions are shown in Table 1. Age, gender, transplant type, and comorbidities were statistically similar between the groups. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the median age of 67 and 52 in the dead and survivor groups, respectively. Significant differences also existed between groups in terms of immunosuppression regimens, namely Tacrolimus (p = 0.037) and Cyclosporine (p = 0.029).
A univariate Cox regression model was performed for ages greater than 60 and immunosuppression regimen, shown in Table 2. Patients aged >60 were associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) (HR = 10, p = 0.0034), as well as Cyclosporine (HR = 6.1, p = 0.0089) or Belatacept for the immunosuppression maintenance (HR = 6.1, p = 0.022), contrary to Tacrolimus (HR = 0.23, p = 0.022). No significant mortality risk or benefit was seen in patients taking prednisone, MMF, Sirolimus, or Azathioprine.
A Kaplan–Meier survival curve and the associated life table are shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, respectively. No SARS-CoV-2-related deaths within 90 days post-infection occurred in the youngest (20–51) age group. For the rest of the groups, deaths occurred 2 to 45 days post-SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The oldest patient group (aged ≥ 72) had the least survival probability (75%) compared to the rest (reference 20–51 years; p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

During the study period, 103 solid-organ-transplant patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 at our institution, with a 9.7% SARS-CoV-2-specific mortality rate within three months of diagnosis. This finding was similar to our early institutional experience and to reports by others during the first year of the pandemic, before vaccinations had become broadly available [7,8,9,11,17,18]. In our cohort, most of the infected patients were kidney-transplant recipients, which aligned with the higher prevalence of this transplant subgroup. Similar to our preliminary reports [8,18], the kidney-transplant-recipient SARS-CoV-2 mortality rate was 11.8% vs. 4.3% among the liver-transplant recipients, with a calculated relative risk of 2.7 (95% CI 0.36–20.3). There were no reported deaths among the 4 combined liver–kidney-transplant recipients who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.
Hypertension and diabetes were present in 12.7% and 15.9% of the deaths. Despite early reports by others, these comorbidities were not associated with increased mortality in our cohort. SARS-CoV-2 mortality increased with advancing age, a finding described in general population outcomes [34].
Mirroring the practice of decreasing or discontinuing MMF in the presence of a viral infection, such as Cytomegalovirus, the antimetabolite dose was decreased or held for two weeks from the time of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Our study failed to demonstrate any significant MMF effect on SRS-CoV-2-related mortality. However, more than 60% of patients who were taking MMF at the time of diagnosis had this medication held or decreased.
In our patient cohort, Tacrolimus demonstrated a protective effect (HR = 6.1, p = 0.022), an observation already reported by others [35]. A meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies investigating the impact of immunosuppression on SARS-CoV-2 suggested that Tacrolimus usage did not impact mortality or SARS-CoV-2 infection severity [36]. In our cohort, only eight (7.8%) patients had been on Cyclosporine at the time of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, three of whom died. In the univariate Cox regression, Cyclosporine was associated with a 6.1 (95% CI 1.6–24) death risk, contrary to a favorable 0.23 (95% CI 0.064–0.81) when using Tacrolimus as a Calcineurin inhibitor. These findings do not necessarily imply causation and should therefore be interpreted with caution; the findings may be attributed to the small patient sample and/or lack of control of confounding variables, including, but not limited to, the underlying indication for the switch to Cyclosporine from Tacrolimus, which has been the standard of care in our institution.
Two out of five (60%) patients who had been on Belatacept at the time of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis eventually succumbed to the disease (HR = 6.1, p = 0.022). The literature is largely limited to case studies on the impact of Belatacept on SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. As a T-cell co-stimulation inhibitor, Belatacept is theorized as a potential mitigator of the cytokine storm caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, it has also been shown to potentially increase the risk of severe opportunistic infections [37,38]. Similar to Cyclosporine, it remains unclear if this apparent positive correlation of Belatacept with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection reflects causation; since Belatacept is a choice often reserved for patients intolerant to CNIs and/or with a significant cardiovascular burden or recent cardiac events, there might be confounders that have not been identified in this small population sample, such as the underlying indication of the patient being switched to Belatacept. Like in the case of Cyclosporine, it may be the underlying comorbidities that led to the immunosuppression-regimen switch rather than the immunosuppression choice per se, as the factors impacting the disease outcome.
As scientific evidence evolved along with the pandemic progression, treatment for SARS-CoV-2 for both inpatients and outpatients at this institution changed over the course of this study, in alignment with the federal guidelines and transplant organizations’ recommendations. Monoclonal-antibody therapy was recommended for SARS-CoV-2-positive transplant recipients managed in the outpatient setting and became available near the end of the study period in December 2020. A total of 21 (20.38%) patients in this study received monoclonal-antibody therapy. Remdesivir and convalescent plasma were also used for inpatients meeting certain criteria. A total of nine (8.74%) patients received Remdesivir, and five (4.85%) received convalescent plasma. While the impact of these treatments was not analyzed as part of this portion of the study, it is reasonable to consider that their use may have mitigated the mortality in these patients, particularly towards the latter stages of the cohort, when antibody treatments became standardized and broadly available, particularly for the higher-risk subgroups.
These data were collected over a period when SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not widely available, therefore providing an opportunity to assess the viral infection fatality in our immunosuppressed population prior to the broad implementation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Age cohorts stood out as remarkable predictors of outcome and provided for a more robust analysis. No patients died in the 20–51-year age group and patients in the >72-year group had the least survival probability (75%, p < 0.001). Other studies have found age to be one of the most important factors in predicting SARS-CoV-2 mortality. This study, combined with data from existing works, is perhaps suggestive of the need to provide more robust, earlier intervention in the older transplant population [39,40,41,42]. Novel treatments such as MABs, antiviral agents, and most importantly preventative measures, could prove particularly life-saving in this older group of unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2-positive transplant recipients.
Statistical limitations existed in this study due to the small sample size. This led to severe model instability when a multivariate Cox regression analysis was attempted, as well as some instability of the univariate regression model. Model instability is particularly prevalent in fields with zero covariates in the fatality group. An extension of this study is currently ongoing to capture a larger study population in the attempt to build a stable model for analysis.

5. Conclusions

Our SARS-CoV-2 transplant registry demonstrated an almost 10% death rate in the early pandemic era, when vaccinations were not yet available and MAB treatment options were still evolving. Despite a trend for the kidney-transplant recipients being more susceptible to severe disease, particularly at the outset of the pandemic, this did not reach significance, while age prevailed as the mortality predictor, increasing the death hazard by a factor of 10 over the age of 60. Tacrolimus immunomodulation was protective in our patient sample. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, since they could be inherent to the well-known limitations of a small sample size and retrospective study bias. Randomized trials are needed to elucidate the various immunosuppression modalities’ impact on disease progression. This pilot study, which was conducted in a highly endemic area of the disease and on a patient population with overall morbidity and mortality among the highest in the United States, may provide the control group for future high-quality propensity-score-matched studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.R., S.B., L.B. and E.G.; Data curation, H.H., A.W. and E.G.; Investigation, H.H., J.N., T.O., G.K. and D.K.; Methodology, H.H. and E.G.; Project administration, E.G.; Resources, A.W., M.K.R., S.B., L.B. and E.G.; Supervision, E.G.; Writing–original draft, H.H., A.W. and E.G.; Writing–review & editing, H.H., A.W., J.N., T.O., G.K., D.K., M.K.R., S.B., L.B. and E.G.; Final revision and approval of the manuscript: E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (protoco l262269, 18 December 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived with approval from an institutional IRB as this was a chart review study with no direct patient contact, all collected patient data was deidentified, and no identifiable patient information is reported.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.; Zhou, Q.; He, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, X.; Wei, X.; Jiang, N.; Liang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, L.; et al. Nosocomial outbreak of COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 2000544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov (accessed on 31 July 2021).
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID Data Tracker. 2021. Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home (accessed on 11 April 2022).
  4. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  5. Avery, R.K.; Chiang, T.P.; Marr, K.A.; Brennan, D.C.; Sait, A.S.; Garibaldi, B.T.; Shah, P.; Ostrander, D.; Steinke, S.M.; Permpalung, N.; et al. Inpatient COVID-19 outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients compared to non-solid organ transplant patients: A retrospective cohort. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 21, 2498–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cravedi, P.; Mothi, S.S.; Azzi, Y.; Haverly, M.; Farouk, S.S.; Pérez-Sáez, M.J.; Redondo-Pachón, M.D.; Murphy, B.; Florman, S.; Cyrino, L.G.; et al. COVID-19 and kidney transplantation: Results from the TANGO International Transplant Consortium. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3140–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Andrés, A.; Loinaz, C.; Delgado, J.F.; López-Medrano, F.; Juan, R.S.; González, E.; Polanco, N.; Folgueira, M.D.; Lalueza, A.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A single-center case series from Spain. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giorgakis, E.; Zehtaban, S.P.; Stevens, A.E.; Bhusal, S.; Burdine, L. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 23, e13419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kates, O.S.; Haydel, B.M.; Florman, S.S.; Rana, M.M.; Chaudhry, Z.S.; Ramesh, M.S.; Safa, K.; Kotton, C.N.; Blumberg, E.A.; Besharatian, B.D.; et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Solid Organ Transplant: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, e4090–e4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nair, V.; Jandovitz, N.; Hirsch, J.S.; Nair, G.; Abate, M.; Bhaskaran, M.; Grodstein, E.; Berlinrut, I.; Hirschwerk, D.; Cohen, S.L.; et al. COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1819–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, M.R.; Mohan, S.; Cohen, D.J.; Husain, S.A.; Dube, G.K.; Ratner, L.E.; Arcasoy, S.; Aversa, M.M.; Benvenuto, L.J.; Dadhania, D.M.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raja, M.A.; Mendoza, M.A.; Villavicencio, A.; Anjan, S.; Reynolds, J.M.; Kittipibul, V.; Fernandez, A.; Guerra, G.; Camargo, J.F.; Simkins, J.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Transplant. Rev. 2020, 35, 100588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salto-Alejandre, S.; Jiménez-Jorge, S.; Sabé, N.; Ramos-Martínez, A.; Linares, L.; Valerio, M.; Martín-Dávila, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Fariñas, M.C.; Blanes-Juliá, M.; et al. Risk factors for unfavorable outcome and impact of early post-transplant infection in solid organ recipients with COVID-19: A prospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Webb, G.J.; Marjot, T.; Cook, J.A.; Aloman, C.; Armstrong, M.J.; Brenner, E.J.; Catana, M.-A.; Cargill, T.; Dhanasekaran, R.; García-Juárez, I.; et al. Outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in liver transplant recipients: An international registry study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Caillard, S.; Anglicheau, D.; Matignon, M.; Durrbach, A.; Greze, C.; Frimat, L.; Thaunat, O.; Legris, T.; Moal, V.; Westeel, P.F.; et al. An initial report from the French SOT COVID Registry suggests high mortality due to COVID-19 in recipients of kidney transplants. Kidney Int. 2020, 98, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. People with Certain Medical Conditions. 12 May 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (accessed on 12 July 2021).
  17. Hadi, Y.B.; Naqvi, S.F.; Kupec, J.T.; Sofka, S.; Sarwari, A. Outcomes of COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Propensity-matched Analysis of a Large Research Network. Transplantation 2021, 105, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hardgrave, H.; Bhusal, S.; Rude, M.K.; Sharma, A.; Gonzalez, M.; Khan, N.; Deneke, M.; Thandassery, R.; Patel, R.; Dare, R.; et al. The Impact of Transplant Type, Age, and Immunosuppresion on Post COVID-19 Infection Survival: A Single Center United States Prospective Cohort Study. Transpl. Int. 2021, 34, 349. [Google Scholar]
  19. Verma, A.; Khorsandi, S.E.; Dolcet, A.; Prachalias, A.; Suddle, A.; Heaton, N.; Jassem, W. Low prevalence and disease severity of COVID-19 in post-liver transplant recipients—A single centre experience. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 1972–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Colmenero, J.; Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M.; Salcedo, M.; Arias-Milla, A.; Muñoz-Serrano, A.; Graus, J.; Nuño, J.; Gastaca, M.; Bustamante-Schneider, J.; Cachero, A.; et al. Epidemiological pattern, incidence, and outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant patients. J. Hepatol. 2020, 74, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Roberts, M.B.; Izzy, S.; Tahir, Z.; Al Jarrah, A.; Fishman, J.A.; El Khoury, J. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Dynamics of disease progression and inflammatory markers in ICU and non-ICU admitted patients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020, 22, e13407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Andersen, K.M.; Mehta, H.B.; Palamuttam, N.; Ford, D.; Garibaldi, B.T.; Auwaerter, P.G.; Segal, J.; Alexander, G.C. Association Between Chronic Use of Immunosuppresive Drugs and Clinical Outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Large US Health System. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e4124–e4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Angelico, R.; Blasi, F.; Manzia, T.; Toti, L.; Tisone, G.; Cacciola, R. The Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Disease: An Update and Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicina 2021, 57, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karruli, A.; Spiezia, S.; Boccia, F.; Gagliardi, M.; Patauner, F.; Salemme, A.; Maiello, C.; Zampino, R.; Durante-Mangoni, E. Effect of immunosuppression maintenance in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kronbichler, A.; Gauckler, P.; Windpessl, M.; Shin, J.I.; Jha, V.; Rovin, B.H.; Oberbauer, R. COVID-19: Implications for immunosuppression in kidney disease and transplantation. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 16, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rammohan, A. Post-transplant immunosuppression and COVID-19: From a double whammy to a mixed blessing. World J. Transplant. 2020, 10, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. The Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program. COVID-19 International Recommendations for ODT. Available online: https://cdtrp.ca/en/covid-19-international-recommendations-for-odt/ (accessed on 31 July 2021).
  28. International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation. Guidance from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplanation regarding the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Available online: https://ishlt.org/ishlt/media/documents/SARS-CoV-2_Guidance-for-Cardiothoracic-Transplant-and-VAD-center.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2022).
  29. Gottlieb, R.L.; Nirula, A.; Chen, P.; Boscia, J.; Heller, B.; Morris, J.; Huhn, G.; Cardona, J.; Mocherla, B.; Stosor, V.; et al. Effect of Bamlanivimab as Monotherapy or in Combination with Etesevimab on Viral Load in Patients with Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 632–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hasan, L.; Hardgrave, H.; Dare, R.; Giorgakis, E. Risk Factors for Hospital Admissions after Monoclonal Antibodies for COVID-19 Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Transpl. Int. 2021, 34, 265–266. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yetmar, Z.A.; Beam, E.; O’Horo, J.C.; Ganesh, R.; Bierle, D.M.; Brumble, L.; Seville, M.T.; Razonable, R.R. Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dodge, Y. The Concise Encylopedia of Statistics, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  33. Siegel, C. Nonparametric Statistics for Behavioral Sciences; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  34. Center for Disease Control. Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographics Characteristics. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  35. Belli, L.S.; Fondevila, C.; Cortesi, P.A.; Conti, S.; Karam, V.; Adam, R.; Coilly, A.; Ericzon, B.G.; Loinaz, C.; Cuervas-Mons, V.; et al. Protective Role of Tacrolimus, Deleterious Role of Age and Comorbidities in Liver Transplant Recipients with Covid-19: Results From the ELITA/ELTR Multi-center European Study. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 1151–1163.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yin, S.; Wang, X.; Song, T. Tacrolimus Use and COVID-19 Infection in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 728–730.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bertrand, D.; Terrec, F.; Etienne, I.; Chavarot, N.; Sberro, R.; Gatault, P.; Garrouste, C.; Bouvier, N.; Grall-Jezequel, A.; Jaureguy, M.; et al. Opportunistic Infections and Efficacy Following Conversion to Belatacept-Based Therapy after Kidney Transplantation: A French Multicenter Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marx, D.; Moulin, B.; Fafi-Kremer, S.; Benotmane, I.; Gautier, G.; Perrin, P.; Caillard, S. First case of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient treated with belatacept. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1944–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oto, O.A.; Ozturk, S.; Turgutalp, K.; Arici, M.; Alpay, N.; Merhametsiz, O.; Sipahi, S.; Ogutmen, M.B.; Yelken, B.; Altiparmak, M.R.; et al. Predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients. BMC Nephrol. 2021, 22, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Requião-Moura, L.R.; de Sandes-Freitas, T.V.; Viana, L.A.; Cristelli, M.P.; de Andrade, L.G.M.; Garcia, V.D.; de Oliveira, C.M.C.; Esmeraldo, R.D.M.; Filho, M.A.; Pacheco-Silva, A.; et al. High mortality among kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019: Results from the Brazilian multicenter cohort study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Udomkarnjananun, S.; Kerr, S.J.; Townamchai, N.; Susantitaphong, P.; Tulvatana, W.; Praditpornsilpa, K.; Eiam-Ong, S.; Avihingsanon, Y. Mortality risk factors of COVID-19 infection in kidney transplantation recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohorts and clinical registries. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yanez, N.D.; Weiss, N.S.; Romand, J.-A.; Treggiari, M.M. COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Transplantology 03 00021 g001 550
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curve of unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 positive solid organ transplant recipients, stratified by age groups (years): 20–51, 51–63, 63–72, >72. Patient survival was inferior in the oldest age group (p < 0.0001).
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curve of unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 positive solid organ transplant recipients, stratified by age groups (years): 20–51, 51–63, 63–72, >72. Patient survival was inferior in the oldest age group (p < 0.0001).
Transplantology 03 00021 g001
Table
Table 1. Patient Demographics, Transplant Type, Comorbidities, and Immunosuppression. Age reported as Median (IQR); analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables reported as n (%); analyzed with Fisher’s exact test.
Table 1. Patient Demographics, Transplant Type, Comorbidities, and Immunosuppression. Age reported as Median (IQR); analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables reported as n (%); analyzed with Fisher’s exact test.
Deaths
N = 10 (%)		Survivors
N = 93 (%)		Total
N = 103 (%)		Mortality
Rate (%)		p Value
Age67 (62, 70)52 (42, 59)54 (42, 62) <0.001
Gender >0.900
Male6 (60.0)52 (56.0)58 (56.3)10.3
Female4 (40.0)41 (44.0)45 (43.7)8.9
Transplant Type 0.600
Liver1 (10.0)22 (24.0)23 (22.3)4.3
Kidney9 (90.0)67 (72.0)76 (73.8)11.8
SLK0 4 (4.3)4 (3.9)0.0
Total10931039.7
Comorbidities
HTN10 (100.0)69 (74.0)79 (76.7)12.70.110
Diabetes7 (70.0)37 (40.0)44 (42.7)15.90.094
Obesity0 (0)16 (17.2)16 (15.5)00.354
Coronary Artery Disease2 (20.0)8 (8.6)10 (9.7))20.00.250
Immunosuppression
Tacrolimus6 (60.0)82 (88.0)88 (85.4)6.80.037
Cyclosporine3 (30.0)5 (5.4)8 (7.8)37.50.029
Prednisone7 (70.0)48 (52.0)55 (54.4)12.70.300
MMF7 (70.0)66 (71.0)77 (70.9)9.1>0.900
Sirolimus1 (10.0)5 (5.4)6 (5.8)16.70.500
Belatacept2 (20.0)3 (3.2)5 (4.9)40.00.073
Azathioprine0 3 (3.2)3 (2.9)0.0>0.900
SLK, simultaneous-liver kidney transplant; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.
Table
Table 2. Univariate Cox Regression Model of Selected Variables.
Table 2. Univariate Cox Regression Model of Selected Variables.
BetaHR95% CIp Value
Age > 602.3010.00(2.10–48.00)0.003
Immunosuppression
Tacrolimus−1.500.23(0.06–0.81)0.022
Cyclosporine1.806.10(1.60–24.00)0.009
Prednisone0.722.10(0.53–7.90)0.300
MMF−0.050.95(0.25–3.70)0.950
Sirolimus0.591.80(0.23–14.00)0.570
Belatacept1.806.10(1.30–29.00)0.022
Azathioprine−17.003.90 × 10−8(0-Inf)1.000
MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.
Table
Table 3. Life Table by Age Group.
Table 3. Life Table by Age Group.
Number at Risk
Age Group (years)0-Days30-Days60-Days90-Days
21–51 years44444444
51–62 years35333232
63–72 years22191717
72+ years2000
Survival (%)
Age Group (years)0-Days30-Days60-Days90-Days
21–51 years100100100100
51–62 years10094.2991.4391.43
63–72 years10086.3677.2777.27
72+ years100000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hardgrave, H.; Wells, A.; Nigh, J.; Osborn, T.; Klutts, G.; Krinock, D.; Rude, M.K.; Bhusal, S.; Burdine, L.; Giorgakis, E. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Unvaccinated Liver- and Kidney-Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience of 103 Consecutive Cases. Transplantology 2022, 3, 200-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology3020021

AMA Style

Hardgrave H, Wells A, Nigh J, Osborn T, Klutts G, Krinock D, Rude MK, Bhusal S, Burdine L, Giorgakis E. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Unvaccinated Liver- and Kidney-Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience of 103 Consecutive Cases. Transplantology. 2022; 3(2):200-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology3020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hardgrave, Hailey, Allison Wells, Joseph Nigh, Tamara Osborn, Garrett Klutts, Derek Krinock, Mary Katherine Rude, Sushma Bhusal, Lyle Burdine, and Emmanouil Giorgakis. 2022. "SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Unvaccinated Liver- and Kidney-Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience of 103 Consecutive Cases" Transplantology 3, no. 2: 200-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology3020021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop