Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity of the Wave Field to High Time-Space Resolution Winds during a Tropical Cyclone
Previous Article in Journal
Wanted Dead or Alive: Skeletal Structure Alteration of Cold-Water Coral Desmophyllum pertusum (Lophelia pertusa) from Anthropogenic Stressors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Variation in Environmental Key Parameters within Fleshy Red Algae Mats in the Mediterranean Sea

by
Alice G. Bianchi
1,2,*,
Christian Wild
1,
Monica Montefalcone
2,3,
Enzo Benincasa
4 and
Yusuf C. El-Khaled
1,*
1
Marine Ecology Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
2
Seascape Ecology Laboratory, DiSTAV-Department of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
NBFC (National Biodiversity Future Center), 90133 Palermook, Italy
4
DISMEQ-Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Oceans 2023, 4(1), 80-91; https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010007
Submission received: 23 October 2022 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023

Abstract

:
In the Mediterranean, the fleshy, mat-forming red alga Phyllophora crispa creates high-biodiversity habitats that influence light availability, water movement, and temperature. However, knowledge about its influence on other key environmental parameters, such as oxygen availability, chlorophyll, and turbidity, is missing. Therefore, we conducted an in situ study in the Western Mediterranean Sea using multiparameter probes that were placed multiple times on algal P. crispa mats, in adjacent Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows, and on bare hard bottoms. We acquired a total of 17 full diel measurements for dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll, and turbidity in September and October 2019. Results showed that P. crispa mats influence the investigated parameters differently when compared to P. oceanica meadows and that a monthly effect was observed. In September, general DO patterns measured for P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows follow the daily cycle depending on light availability, with the measured DO being lower in the P. oceanica meadows compared to the P. crispa mats and the hard-bottom habitats. In October, however, no significant difference in DO concentrations was observed between P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows. Results of this study corroborate that P. crispa mats can be viewed as an ecosystem engineering species, influencing environmental parameters and, hence, providing a habitat for outstanding associated biodiversity.

1. Introduction

Ecosystem engineering species are organisms able to physically change the abiotic environment in which they live [1]. This concept depends on the spatial, temporal, and organizational structure of the species with the environment [2]. While native ecosystem engineers are key species for ecosystems [1] and have often been studied when they have decreased dramatically [3], non-indigenous species that act as ecosystem engineers can have profound impacts (positive and negative) on the receiving ecosystem. The presence of ecosystem engineers involves direct physical changes in habitat architecture and indirect changes in the substrate, for example, by trapping sediment particles or changing the light intensity at the bottom [3]. A classic example of an ecosystem engineer is the most common macrophyte in the Mediterranean Sea, the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile 1813, an endemic species that forms wide meadows [1]. As such, P. oceanica meadows shape a range of variables such as wave exposure [3,4], light availability [5], and temperature [6,7].
Recently, algal assemblages dominated by the red alga Phyllophora crispa P.S. Dixon, 1964, received some attention expressed by a growing number of studies [6,8,9,10,11]. P. crispa develops dense algal mats that harbor high biodiversity [8,9,11,12,13] and are becoming an important coastal habitat in the Mediterranean Sea [8,11]. As already observed in the Black Sea [13,14], P. crispa mats are largely colonizing wide areas of the rocky benthic communities along the coasts of the Giglio Island (Tuscany, Italy) [8] and in other locations of the Mediterranean Sea [15,16]. Recent observations show that P. crispa mats not only replace but also overgrow benthic infralittoral Mediterranean habitats such as seagrass meadows or hard-bottom habitats with gorgonian dominance [17]. The laminal thallus of P. crispa mats represents a living substrate suitable for the colonization of solitary sessile species, for example, by increasing the area available for their settlement [9]. The thallus of P. crispa mats produces a substrate suitable not only for polychaetes [9], foraminifera [9], and bryozoans [10] but also for encrusting invertebrates (e.g., sponges [8]), as well as for many vagile species, mainly mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms [8]. This indicates that P. crispa mats may act as ecosystem engineers, thus, likely modifying key environmental parameters. A recent study by Schmidt et al., 2021 [6], found that dense mats of P. crispa significantly affect some environmental factors within the algal mats, such as temperature, light availability, and water movement, and their influence is similar to or even greater than that of the well-known ecosystem engineer P. oceanica meadow [6]. However, knowledge about the influence of P. crispa mats on other major environmental parameters, such as dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration [18] and chlorophyll [19], is still missing.
Thus, we here aim to quantify various environmental key parameters (DO, chlorophyll, turbidity, and temperature) in P. crispa mats and two reference habitats, i.e., adjacent P. oceanica seagrass meadows and bare hard-bottom habitat, by addressing the following research questions: (i) How do P. crispa mats influence DO and chlorophyll along with turbidity and temperature in comparison to neighboring habitats? (ii) What is the daily and monthly variation in these key parameters in P. crispa mats in comparison to its neighboring habitats?
To answer these research questions, four multi-probes were positioned multiple times within P. crispa mats, in the adjacent P. oceanica meadows, and in the bare hard-bottom habitat serving as a reference habitat.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Experimental Design

The research took place at Punta del Morto on the Giglio Island (Tuscany, Italy; Figure 1), located on the northern side of the island (42°23′22.2″ N, 10°53′24.3″ E). Four Eureka Manta-2 multi-probes (GEO Scientific Ltd., Austin, TX, USA) were randomly placed in the three target habitats to investigate their physical and chemical characteristics: (i) P. crispa mats with a thickness of >5 cm; (ii) P. oceanica seagrass meadows with a height of >20 cm; and (iii) in the hard-bottom habitats (Figure 2). All probes were deployed at 28 m depth, where the three target habitats were found in close vicinity being less than 30 m apart from each other. Two sampling periods were chosen, i.e., 7–18 September 2019 and 9–17 October 2019, to evaluate potential monthly variations in the target environmental parameters. During the first sampling period, the probes were placed eight times in P. crispa mats, six times in P. oceanica meadows, and five times in hard-bottom habitats, for at least 24 h. During the second sampling period, the probes were placed three times in P. crispa mats, seven times in P. oceanica meadows, and two times in hard-bottom habitats, for at least 24 h. To increase the stability of the probes underwater, the Manta multi-probes were modified with the addition of weights to the basal area of the instrument (Figure 2B). The environmental parameters recorded were dissolved oxygen (DO; mg L−1), chlorophyll (µg L−1), turbidity (NTU), and temperature (°C). Once in the water, the multi-probes acquired simultaneously the values of each parameter with a sampling interval of one minute for at least 24 h. At the end of the acquisition, the multi-probes were recovered and brought to the laboratory for data analyses.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The acquired values of each environmental parameter were displayed through scatter plots using the statistical software R.Studio (version 4.1.3) to highlight the data adaptation curves. Significant differences in the four measured environmental parameters (i.e., dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll, turbidity of the water, and water temperature) among the three target habitats (i.e., P. crispa mats, P. oceanica meadows, and hard-bottom habitats) were analyzed. The averages of the dependent variables (the four parameters) at the levels of the group variable (the investigated habitats) were compared both between environments and between months through a statistical test based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA, results can be seen in Table 1), with significance level α = 0.05. To be used, an ANOVA requires the assumptions of normality (the sampled data must come from a population with a normal distribution) and homoscedasticity (the variance of the groups must be the same as that of the population) [21]. To test the assumption of normality, the first transformation of the dependent variables in logarithmic scale was carried out, and then we proceeded to use the Shapiro–Wilk test (Supplementary Material Table S1), while to test the homoscedasticity, the Levine test was used (Supplementary Material Table S2). Since available data are independent samples, we used an ANOVA, which allowed us to verify the significance of the environmental factor. Afterwards, we checked if the effect linked to each type of environment also varied according to the months in which the measurements were recorded (effect of interaction between the month variable and the environment variable). This last goal was managed through the post hoc correction of Tukey HSD, with the Bonferroni adjustment (Supplementary Material Table S3) [22].

3. Results

3.1. Temperature

Temperature values ranged from a minimum of 16.8 °C to a maximum of 21.2 °C both detected in P. oceanica meadows. The temperatures measured in September showed mostly significant differences among the three habitats (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001 for both P. oceanica meadows vs. P. crispa mats and hard-bottom habitats vs. P. crispa mats; Figure 3A, Table 2). Temperature in all three habitats peaked at 04:00 pm in September, with P. crispa mats reaching a temperature of 18.40 °C, P. oceanica meadows 19.25 °C, and hard-bottom habitats 19.71 °C (Figure 3A). During October, significant differences between P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows (Tukey HSD, p = 0.026; Table 2) were registered. The mean temperature in P. oceanica meadows in September was 19.41 ± 0.38 °C, which was significantly lower than in P. crispa mats (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001; Figure 3B, Table 2).

3.2. Turbidity

Turbidity values fluctuated between a minimum of 0.09 NTU detected in P. crispa mats to a maximum of 8.63 NTU registered in the P. oceanica meadows. In both September and October, significant differences in the turbidity values among the three habitats were detected (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001; Table 2). In September, turbidity was constant during the 24 h in all three habitats (Figure 3C) with daily mean values of 0.22 ± 0.11 NTU for P. crispa mats and 136 ± 0.24 NTU for P. oceanica meadows. Turbidity measured in October within the P. crispa mats increased to 2.86 NTU at 11:00 am and then remained stable until 9:00 pm (Figure 3D). In P. oceanica meadows, turbidity was higher, peaking at 04:00 pm at a value of 8.63 NTU and then remaining stable (Figure 3F).

3.3. Dissolved Oxygen

The range of dissolved oxygen (DO) values between the three environments ranges from a minimum of 98% O₂ detected in the hard-bottom habitats to a maximum of 110% O₂ found in the P. crispa mats. The DO concentration was similar for P. oceanica meadows and hard-bottom habitats in September (Figure 3E), whereas a different daily DO concentration cycle was observed for P. crispa mats. In September, DO concentrations in the P. oceanica meadows were significantly higher during the 24 h compared to P. crispa mats (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001; Table 2), with DO concentrations peaking at 105% O₂ in P. crispa mats at 08:00 pm, followed by a decrease at 09:00 pm when the minimum value of 99% O₂ was recorded. During October, no significant differences in DO between P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows were registered but between hard-bottom habitats and both P. oceanica meadows and P. crispa mats (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001; Table 2; Figure 3F).

3.4. Chlorophyll

Chlorophyll concentrations in the three environments ranged from a minimum of 0.19 µg L−1 recorded in the hard-bottom habitats to a maximum of 8.19 µg L−1 detected in P. crispa mats. The values registered in the hard-bottom habitats were constant, with an average value of 0.29 µg L−1. In September, chlorophyll concentrations were similar in P. crispa and P. oceanica (Tukey HSD, p = 0.969; Table 2, Figure 3G). The daily average of chlorophyll registered in P. crispa mats was 3.00 ± 1.26 µg L−1. It peaked at 04:00 pm with a concentration of 5.55 µg L−1, followed by a decrease until 9:00 pm to constant values of about 2.05 µg L−1. Chlorophyll concentrations measured in the P. oceanica meadows during September peaked at 04:00 pm at a value of 6.05 µg L−1. In October, the chlorophyll showed significant differences only between P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows and between P. crispa mats and the hard-bottom habitats (Tukey HSD, p < 0.001; Table 2). Additionally, the chlorophyll concentration measured within the P. crispa mats decreased drastically from 11:00 am to 09:00 pm in October, reaching a minimum value of 2.97 µg L−1 at 08:00 pm (Figure 3H). In this month, the mean daily value of chlorophyll was 0.053 ± 0.04 µg L−1 for P. oceanica meadows and 0.24 ± 0.03 µg L−1 for hard-bottom habitats.

4. Discussion

Mats formed by Phyllophora crispa are of growing interest, as this key structural and fast-growing alga of the Mediterranean [8] is replacing many classical Mediterranean habitats [17], harboring outstanding associated invertebrate biodiversity [8,11]. The parameters investigated in this study extend the findings of a recent study by Schmidt et al., 2021 [6], by showing that relevant environmental parameters, such as dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll, turbidity, and intense solar radiation differ among months and corroborate the concept that P. crispa mats can be considered as an ecosystem engineer.

4.1. How Do P. crispa Mats Influence Oxygen and Chlorophyll along with Turbidity and Temperature in Comparison to Neighboring Habitats?

Throughout the sampling period, higher values of DO, temperature, turbidity, and chlorophyll (registered global minimum or maximum values depending on the different parameters) were recorded within P. crispa mats compared to adjacent P. oceanica meadows and hard-bottom habitats. The temperature in all three target habitats was higher in October compared to September, especially during the central hours of the day, when the sun is warmer. Variations in water temperature can create conditions that lead to ecological change, for example, the invasions of alien species [23] with important associated physical and geomorphic interactions [24]. The DO concentrations and temperatures found in P. crispa mats did not differ significantly from the hard-bottom habitats, probably due to an effective mixing of overlaying waters. The lower values of DO found in P. oceanica meadows compared to P. crispa mats may be explained by the positioning of the probes in the rhizoidal zone of the meadow, a part of the plants that does not carry out photosynthetic activity but respiration [25]. The recorded patterns of DO concentrations, although they reflect the daily cycle with increasing DO concentrations during the daytime and decreasing during the night hours (visible especially in September), are generally lower in P. oceanica meadows than in P. crispa mats and hard-bottom habitats. The increase in temperature in October could explain the observed patterns in the trend of DO, which is inversely proportional to the temperature [26]. Both DO and chlorophyll significantly differed between the two investigated periods in each habitat. It should also be noted that, although statistical analyses indicate that in October there is no significant difference in the amount of DO between P. crispa mats and P. oceanica meadows, some differences occur: while P. crispa mats reveal peaks of DO at certain times of the day, P. oceanica meadows have a more uniform trend during the daily span of October. The increase in temperature during autumn can affect the increase in sediment suspension [24]. In P. crispa mats, the increased turbidity during the middle hours of the day in October probably contributed to a decrease in the chlorophyll released by its fronds. Suspended sediments may be responsible for the attenuation of sunlight [27] and, consequently, the decrease in benthos-reaching light [28] influencing photosynthetic activity [29] and the release of chlorophyll into the environment. The higher and constant turbidity values measured in October in the P. oceanica meadows may be due to weather conditions [30]. Comparatively low water movement inside the red algae mats, as observed in the same sampling period [6], could lead to a suspension of sediment within the P. oceanica meadows due to its dense rhizomes that reduce water current and, in turn, lead to higher turbidity [31]. Increased turbidity during the hottest hours of the day (11:00 am–9:00 pm) in P. crispa mats was observed. This increase could negatively impact light availability [6], which in turn could influence photosynthetic activity [32], thus explaining the lower DO values measured in P. oceanica meadows in September. The high turbidity values recorded in P. crispa mats in October are concomitant with a decrease in chlorophyll. This contradicts reciprocal patterns in P. oceanica meadows and previous findings, demonstrating a link between turbidity and chlorophyll production [33]. Our data show that both turbidity and temperature may cause changes in DO and chlorophyll levels. The interaction effect of these two variables both with the environment and with the months is significant, highlighting how the impact of turbidity and oxygen varies in relation to the environment and with months. Our results indicate that in September the average level of DO in the environment of P. crispa is similar to the average level found in the hard-bottom environment, while in October it is similar to the average value visible in the P. oceanica environments.
For chlorophyll, the average concentration measured within P. crispa mats in September is similar to that in the P. oceanica meadows, while in October it differs from that of both other environments. However, the daily trend of DO and chlorophyll for P. crispa mats changes in the two months, above all if compared with that of the other environments as it presents more extreme peaks during certain phases of the day. We assume that this is due to an effect of turbidity and temperature.

4.2. What Is the Daily and Monthly Variation in These Key Parameters in P. crispa Mats in Comparison to Neighboring Habitats?

The parameters recorded in the three habitats vary with the investigated months. September 2019 was a month in which no storm surges or bad weather were recorded [20]. In September, the temperatures recorded in the three habitats were a few degrees Celsius lower than in the following month, and this month is characterized by greater sun exposure being the last month of the summer season [20]. Intense daily light hours and weather contributed to greater photosynthetic activity, visible with the increase in chlorophyll and DO concentrations in the target habitats, an increase that coincides with the hours of maximum sun exposure and then decreases at sunset. October 2019 was a month that recorded several days of bad weather, wind, and high waves that did not facilitate the acquisition of data. The increased current intensity influenced the mixing of water by increasing turbidity and affecting the production of dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll at the bottom. In addition, even slightly higher temperature values contributed to a decrease in dissolved oxygen. In both months, we assume that the monthly variations affect the trend of the physical and chemical values and we hypothesize that the latter are interconnected in each habitat. In particular, the interaction between chlorophyll and turbidity is visible in P. crispa mats in October, where a sharp increase in suspended sediments during daylight hours (10 am–10 pm) reduced the amount of light on the bottom, potentially resulting in reduced photosynthetic activity [27]. In fact, one of the physical properties of the suspended sediment is precisely that of dispersing and absorbing even solar photons, modifying the radiation of the underwater field and consequently the thermal characteristics and the primary production within the water body [27]. The trends of the parameters in the P. crispa habitats appear to be more different from those of the nearby habitats in October. It can also be noted that the trend of chlorophyll is opposite in the two months: chlorophyll concentrations increase during the day and then progressively decrease during the night in September, while in October they decrease during the day and then increase again overnight. Some sites may be characterized by a mild seasonal effect of sediments more in summer and coarser in winter, explained by the seasonality of waves, currents, and storms [34]. The load of suspended sediments was greater in autumn than in September, particularly in P. oceanica meadows where the turbidity is greater than in the other investigated habitats. One of the reasons for greater turbidity may be the predominant adverse weather and marine conditions throughout the month of October 2019. The Mediterranean Sea is a basin whose temperature is strongly influenced by seasonal changes [35]. The sea has a very high heat capacity [35] that generates a temperature difference between the sea and the land, causing heat exchanges between the two systems, so that in summer the sea absorbs heat from the coast, and in winter it releases it gradually. On a physical level, the concept of water thermoregulation may explain the increase of a few degrees in temperature in late October compared to early September in P. crispa mats, P. oceanica meadows, and hard-bottom habitats. The graphs (Figure 3) show how the parameters in the three habitats are similar to each other; for example, the maximum values are reached in the same time slot, and the curves decrease in a similar way. Nevertheless, the comparison of pairs of parameters of each habitat performed with ANOVA (Table 1) found that the trends are different for each environment. In particular, in the case of DO, it can be assumed that the differences found between pairs of parameters can be caused by turbidity and temperature, which from ANOVA appear to affect the levels of DO.

4.3. Ecological Implications

In the Black Sea, P. crispa is considered a key species as it creates a habitat for many species of marine fauna and flora, which reproduce and recruit within the three-dimensional structure provided by this red alga [14,36]. The different chemical-physical factors that influence the possible presence of epiphytes include nutrient availability, temperature, salinity, depth, current, and the amount of light [37]. The production of oxygen by plants and seaweeds determines the amount of the epiphytic community associated with them [25]. The community of sessile and vagile animals can create oxygen fluctuations within algal mats and lawns and can attenuate the flow of light [38,39] and increase the resistance of the transfer of dissolved substances between their mass and the surface of the plant [40]. The abundance of some vagile or sessile organisms can also depend on variations in environmental parameters, according to the monthly payments [37,38]. In September, the lower production of chlorophyll may be associated with seasonal sessile organisms that occupy the thallus of P. crispa mats. In October, chlorophyll concentrations were high, potentially indicating fewer organisms present on the thallus of P. crispa mats. During that month, however, a decrease in DO concentrations and an increase in turbidity may also be associated with seasonal vagile organisms that live on the thallus of P. crispa mats. The abundance of foraminifera found in P. crispa mats [9] may be due to the characteristics of DO [41,42], from organic material within sediment and chlorophyll concentration [34]. The higher chlorophyll values recorded in October compared to September may have also been influenced by the possible presence of associated seasonal biodiversity [37,38]; some foraminifera are seasonal, and their abundance is moderated by temperature variations [43] and by the deposition and removal of sludge [34]. The suspension of organic material may be due to bioturbation activities such as those carried out by polychaetes [34], which feed rapidly on organic material [44,45,46] and increase the suspended sediment, favoring the penetration of DO into the seabed [34,44]. P. crispa mats with their ability to retain sediment could function as a food source and create habitat for its associated organisms [6]. As in the Black Sea [14], P. crispa mats could serve as a biodiversity hotspot in the Mediterranean Sea for invertebrates, to a certain extent also surpassing P. oceanica meadows in species richness and diversity since a range of sessile, colonial, and aggregate species can be found almost exclusively in P. crispa mats [8,9,11]. In this context, P. crispa mats have recently been proposed as an ecosystem engineer [6]. The high primary production and the wide supply of labile organic matter over a prolonged period favor the development of foraminifera [44]. The higher concentrations of chlorophyll recorded in the P. crispa mats compared to P. oceanica meadows (for both months of sampling) may contribute to a greater abundance of foraminifera found in the algal mat than in the seagrass [11]. The three-dimensional structure of P. crispa mats with a large surface area enlargement factor [11], in addition to influencing the chemical and physical environmental parameters, can also influence any communities present [10]. Given the possible presence of resident organisms on the thallus of P. crispa mats [8,10,45], several sessile, colonial, and mobile species may also benefit from these changes.

4.4. Limitations and Conclusions

Spatiotemporal research, such as monitoring key environmental parameters, is often limited by technical and logistical issues. These limitations can be addressed and reduced by following a scientifically robust experimental design [46], including a maximum amount of spatiotemporal replication and a statistical analysis using mixed models, useful in contexts where repeated measurements are made on the same statistical units, especially for their advantage of dealing with missing values [47]. Here, we were able to deploy the respective probes with the following replication: n = 8 for P. crispa, n = 6 for P. oceanica, and n = 5 for hard-bottom habitats in September 2019 and n = 3 for P. crispa, n = 7 for P. oceanica, and n = 2 for hard-bottom habitats in October 2019. All probes consecutively collected data for 24 h covering a full daily cycle. We acknowledge that two of the aforementioned six deployments (n = 3 and n = 2 for P. crispa and hard-bottom habitats, respectively, in October 2019) range at the lower end of an appropriate replication. However, working at a depth of ~30 m limits the bottom time for divers without exceeding decompression limits. Therefore, prioritizing divers’ safety while deploying the probes led to a reduced number of deployments during the second half of the experimental period, thus resulting in a lower replication. Nevertheless, we assume that the collected data still provide valuable insights that corroborate the previously characterized role of P. crispa mats as ecosystem engineers. We here were able to demonstrate that several key environmental parameters are significantly modified by P. crispa mats, and seasonal changes within these parameters are likely to subsequently affect the associated biodiversity. We conclude that despite its surprising function as an ecosystem engineer, further investigations should aim to include a higher spatial and temporal resolution to understand (i) to what extent the environmental parameters may vary over seasons and (ii) whether the observed patterns can be found at other reported locations in which P. crispa mats occur, such as the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, or the Atlantic.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/oceans4010007/s1, Table S1: Shapiro–Wilk test for the analysis of normality. The assumption of normality is a requirement for the execution of ANOVA for repeated measures, Table S2: Mauchly test for the verification of sphericity. The assumption of sphericity is a requirement for the execution of ANOVA for repeated measurements, Table S3: Bonferroni adjustment for the verification of the monthly influence on the environmental parameters recorded in the three habitats. The Bonferroni adjustment is considered an extension to the case of repeated measurements of the post hoc correction of Tukey for the classic ANOVA [22].

Author Contributions

Y.C.E.-K., A.G.B. and C.W. conceptualized and designed the research. A.G.B. and Y.C.E.-K. performed the research. A.G.B., E.B. and Y.C.E.-K. analyzed the data. A.G.B., C.W., M.M. and Y.C.E.-K. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded through baseline funding to C.W.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jenny Tucek and “Institut fur Marine Biologie” (IfMB) for welcoming us to Giglio Island and for logistical support. We would like to thank Campese Diving Center and its owners Reina and Regina Krumbach for their help during data acquisition. We would like to thank Felix Ivo Roβbach, Beltran Montt, Neele Schmidt, and Susann Roβbach for the support shown during the data collection. We also acknowledge Cristina Misic (DiSTAV, University of Genoa) for her suggestions during data analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jones, C.G.; Lawton, J.H.; Shachak, M. Positive and Negative Effects of Organisms as Physical Ecosystem Engineers. Ecology 1997, 78, 1946–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hastings, A.; Byers, J.; Crooks, J.A.; Cuddington, K.; Jones, C.; Lambrinos, J.G.; Talley, T.S.; Wilson, W.G. Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koch, E.W. Beyond Light: Physical, Geological, and Geochemical Parameters as Possible Submersed Aquatic Vegetation Habitat Requirements. Estuaries 2001, 24, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Koch, E.W.; Sanford, L.P.; Chen, S.-N.; Shafer, D.J.; Smith, J.M. Waves in Seagrass Systems: Review and Technical Recommendations; Defense Technical Information Center: Fort Belvoir, VA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Via, J.D.; Sturmbauer, C.; Schönweger, G.; Sötz, E.; Mathekowitsch, S.; Stifter, M.; Rieger, R. Light gradients and meadow structure in Posidonia oceanica: Ecomorphological and functional correlates. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998, 163, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schmidt, N.; El-Khaled, Y.C.; Roßbach, F.I.; Wild, C. Fleshy Red Algae Mats Influence Their Environment in the Mediterranean Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 721626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arumugam, R.; Kannan, R.R.R.; Saravanan, K.R.; Thangaradjou, T.; Anantharaman, P. Hydrographic and sediment characteristics of seagrass meadows of the Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve, South India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 8411–8427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonifazi, A.; Ventura, D.; Gravina, M.F.; Lasinio, G.J.; Belluscio, A.; Ardizzone, G.D. Unusual algal turfs associated with the rhodophyta Phyllophora crispa: Benthic assemblages along a depth gradient in the Central Mediterranean Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2017, 185, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossbach, F.; Casoli, E.; Beck, M.; Wild, C. Mediterranean Red Macro Algae Mats as Habitat for High Abundances of Serpulid Polychaetes. Diversity 2021, 13, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rossbach, F.I.; Casoli, E.; Plewka, J.; Schmidt, N.; Wild, C. New Insights into a Mediterranean Sea Benthic Habitat: High Diversity of Epiphytic Bryozoan Assemblages on Phyllophora crispa (Rhodophyta) Mats. Diversity 2022, 14, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El-Khaled, Y.C.; Daraghmeh, N.; Tilstra, A.; Roth, F.; Huettel, M.; Rossbach, F.I.; Casoli, E.; Koester, A.; Beck, M.; Meyer, R.; et al. Fleshy red algae mats act as temporary reservoirs for sessile invertebrate biodiversity. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. An Introduction to the Black Sea Ecology. Available online: https://aquadocs.org/bitstream/handle/1834/12945/An%20introduction%20to%20the%20Black%20sea%20ecology.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  13. Berov, D.; Todorova, V.; Dimitrov, L.; Rinde, E.; Karamfilov, V. Distribution and abundance of phytobenthic communities: Implications for connectivity and ecosystem functioning in a Black Sea Marine Protected Area. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2018, 200, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zaitsev, Y. Introduction to the Black Sea Ecology; Smil Edition and Publishing Agency Ltd.: Chelmsford, UK, 2008; Available online: https://aquadocs.org/handle/1834/12945 (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  15. Guiry, M.D. Macroalgae of Rhodophycota, Phaeophycota, Chlorophycota, and two genera of Xanthophycota. Collect. Patrim. Nat. 2001, 50, 20–38. Available online: https://www.vliz.be/nl/personen-opzoeken?module=ref&refid=61168 (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  16. Navone, A.; Bianchi, C.N.; Orru, P.; Ulzega, A. Saggio di cartografia geomorfologica e bionomica nel parco marino di Tavolara-Capo coda cavallo (Sardegna Nord-Orientale). Oebalia 1992, 17, 469–478. [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Khaled, Y.C.; Tilstra, A.; Mezger, S.D.; Wild, C. Red and brown algae mats overgrow classical marine biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean Sea. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kannel, P.R.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kanel, S.R.; Khan, S.P. Application of Water Quality Indices and Dissolved Oxygen as Indicators for River Water Classification and Urban Impact Assessment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 132, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cicero, A.; Giovanardi, F. Classificazione dello Stato Ecologico dei Corpi Idrici delle Acque Marino Costiere; Implementazione della Direttiva IMP 2000/60/CE (ISPRA); ISPRA: Roma, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Che Tempo Faceva a Isola del Giglio a Settembre 2019-Archivio Meteo Isola del Giglio iLMeteo. It. Available online: https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/archivio-meteo/Isola%20del%20Giglio/2019/Settembre (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  21. Ross, A.; Willson, V.L. One-Way Anova. In Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ury, H.K.; Wiggins, A.D. Use of the Bonferroni inequality for multiple comparisons among means with post hoc contrasts. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 1974, 27, 176–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wolf, M.; Sfriso, A.; Moro, I. Thermal pollution and settlement of new tropical alien species: The case of Grateloupia yinggehaiensis (Rhodophyta) in the Venice Lagoon. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2014, 147, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pivato, M.; Carniello, L.; Gardner, J.; Silvestri, S.; Marani, M. Water and sediment temperature dynamics in shallow tidal environments: The role of the heat flux at the sediment-water interface. Adv. Water Resour. 2018, 113, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murray, L.; Wetzel, R. Oxygen production and consumption associated with the major autotrophic components in two temperate seagrass communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1987, 38, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guerra, D. Uso di Parametri Chimico-Fisici Come Traccianti per Caratterizzare Masse d’acqua in Mediterraneo Occidentale. Misure di Ossigeno Disciolto e Salinità per la Calibrazione dei Sensori. 2017. Available online: http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/11881 (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  27. Kirk, J.T.O. Effects of suspensoids (turbidity) on penetration of solar radiation in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 1985, 125, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duarte, C.M. Seagrass depth limits. Aquat. Bot. 1991, 40, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meyer, B.S.; Heritage, A.C. Effect of Turbidity and Depth of Immersion on Apparent Photosynthesis in Ceratophyllum Demersum. Ecology 1941, 22, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koch, E.W. Sediment resuspension in a shallow Thalassia testudinum banks ex König bed. Aquat. Bot. 1999, 65, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Infantes, E.; Terrados, J.; Orfila, A.; Cañellas, B.; Álvarez-Ellacuria, A. Wave energy and the upper depth limit distribution of Posidonia oceanica. Bot. Mar. 2009, 52, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pergent, G.; Mendez, S.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Pasqualini, V. Preliminary data on the impact of fish farming facilities on Posidonia oceanica meadows in the Mediterranean. Oceanol. Acta 1999, 22, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Passantino, L.; Malley, J.; Knudson, M.; Ward, R.; Kim, J. Effect of Low Turbidity and Algae on UV Disinfection Performance. J. AWWA 2004, 96, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hyams-Kaphzan, O.; Almogi-Labin, A.; Benjamini, C.; Herut, B. Natural oligotrophy vs. pollution-induced eutrophy on the SE Mediterranean shallow shelf (Israel): Environmental parameters and benthic foraminifera. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 58, 1888–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Claps, P.; Giordano, P.; Laguardia, G. Spatial Distribution of the Average Air Temperatures in Italy: Quantitative Analysis. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kostylev, E.F.; Tkachenko, F.P.; Tretiak, I.P. Establishment of “Zernov’s Phyllophora field” marine reserve: Protection and restoration of a unique ecosystem. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2010, 53, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Frankovich, T.A.; Fourqurean, J. Seagrass epiphyte loads along a nutrient availability gradient, Florida Bay, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 159, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sand-Jensen, K. Effect of epiphytes on eelgrass photosynthesis. Aquat. Bot. 1977, 3, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brush, M.; Nixon, S. Direct measurements of light attenuation by epiphytes on eelgrass Zostera marina. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 238, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sand-Jensen, K.; Revsbech, N.P.; Jørgensen, B.B. Microprofiles of oxygen in epiphyte communities on submerged macrophytes. Mar. Biol. 1985, 89, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moodley, L.; Schaub, B.; Van Der Zwaan, G.; Herman, P. Tolerance of benthic foraminifera (Protista: Sarcodina) to hydrogen sulphide. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998, 169, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bernhard, J.M. Potential Symbionts in Bathyal Foraminifera. Science 2003, 299, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, F.; Chung, N.; Bae, M.-J.; Kwon, Y.-S.; Kwon, T.-S.; Park, Y.-S. Temperature change and macroinvertebrate biodiversity: Assessments of organism vulnerability and potential distributions. Clim. Chang. 2013, 119, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Diz, P.; Francés, G. Distribution of live benthic foraminifera in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Mar. Micropaleontol. 2008, 16, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Fraschetti, S.; Giangrande, A.; Terlizzi, A.; Miglietta, M.; Della Tommasa, L.; Boero, F. Spatio-temporal variation of hydroids and polychaetes associated with Cystoseira amentacea (Fucales: Phaeophyceae). Mar. Biol. 2002, 140, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Machery, E. What is a replication? Philos. Sci. 2020, 87, 545–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krueger, C.; Tian, L. A comparison of the general linear mixed model and repeated measures ANOVA using a dataset with multiple missing data points. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2004, 6, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the Giglio Island with the diving spot at Punta del Morto (map of the Giglio Island modified from Google Earth ; aerial image by Google Maps) [20].
Figure 1. Map of the Giglio Island with the diving spot at Punta del Morto (map of the Giglio Island modified from Google Earth ; aerial image by Google Maps) [20].
Oceans 04 00007 g001
Figure 2. Eureka Manta-2 multi-probes deployed at 28 m depth in Phyllophora crispa mats (A), hard-bottom habitats (B), and within the Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows (C). Photos taken by Alice G. Bianchi.
Figure 2. Eureka Manta-2 multi-probes deployed at 28 m depth in Phyllophora crispa mats (A), hard-bottom habitats (B), and within the Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows (C). Photos taken by Alice G. Bianchi.
Oceans 04 00007 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of temperature (A,B), turbidity (C,D), dissolved oxygen (E,F), and chlorophyll (G,H) in Phyllophora crispa mats (blue line), Posidonia oceanica meadows (pink line), and hard-bottom habitats (gray line), during September (left) and October (right). Probes were placed for at least 24 h with n = 8 for P. crispa, n = 6 for P. oceanica, and n = 5 for hard-bottom habitats in September 2019 and n = 3 for P. crispa, n = 7 for P. oceanica, and n = 2 for hard-bottom habitats in October 2019. The continuous lines are the daily mean values; the dotted lines are the trend line of values. The temperature data for October (B) in the hard-bottom habitats are missing due to technical problems.
Figure 3. Comparison of temperature (A,B), turbidity (C,D), dissolved oxygen (E,F), and chlorophyll (G,H) in Phyllophora crispa mats (blue line), Posidonia oceanica meadows (pink line), and hard-bottom habitats (gray line), during September (left) and October (right). Probes were placed for at least 24 h with n = 8 for P. crispa, n = 6 for P. oceanica, and n = 5 for hard-bottom habitats in September 2019 and n = 3 for P. crispa, n = 7 for P. oceanica, and n = 2 for hard-bottom habitats in October 2019. The continuous lines are the daily mean values; the dotted lines are the trend line of values. The temperature data for October (B) in the hard-bottom habitats are missing due to technical problems.
Oceans 04 00007 g003
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluates the significance of the environment variable and the interaction between the latter variable and the month variable for all four chemical-physical parameters. In the specific case of dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll, the impact of temperature, turbidity, and their respective interactions with the environment and month variables is evaluated. Top: p-values. Bottom: F-values.
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluates the significance of the environment variable and the interaction between the latter variable and the month variable for all four chemical-physical parameters. In the specific case of dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll, the impact of temperature, turbidity, and their respective interactions with the environment and month variables is evaluated. Top: p-values. Bottom: F-values.
Dissolved OxygenChlorophyll
Temperature<0.001
37.406
<0.001
8.412
Turbidity0.007
7.707
<0.001
301.411
Habitat<0.001
122.456
<0.001
73.515
Habitat × month<0.001
18.972
<0.001
88.033
Habitat × Temperature<0.001
8.467
0.011
5.682
Habitat × Turbidity0.003
6.501
<0.001
32.536
Month × Temperature0.010
5.317
0.002
10.252
Month × turbidity0.011
4.839
<0.001
14.479
HabitatMonths × Habitat
Turbidity<0.001
628.3
0.001
7.570
Temperature0.026
5.298
<0.001
20.447
Table 2. Post hoc Tukey HSD statistical analysis to evaluate differences between pairs of environments (Phyllophora crispa mats, Posidonia oceanica meadows, hard-bottom habitats) on the monthly values of environmental parameters.
Table 2. Post hoc Tukey HSD statistical analysis to evaluate differences between pairs of environments (Phyllophora crispa mats, Posidonia oceanica meadows, hard-bottom habitats) on the monthly values of environmental parameters.
SeptemberOctober
P. crispa Mats vs. Hard-Bottom HabitatsP. crispa Mats vs. P. oceanica MeadowsP. oceanica Meadows vs. Hard-Bottom HabitatsP. crispa Mats vs. Hard-Bottom HabitatsP. crispa Mats vs. P. oceanica MeadowsP. oceanica Meadows vs. Hard-Bottom Habitats
Dissolved oxygen0.590<0.001<0.001<0.0010.856<0.001
Chlorophyll<0.0010.969<0.001<0.001<0.0010.074
Turbidity<0.001<0.001<0.0010.707<0.001<0.001
Temperature<0.001<0.0010.223-0.026-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bianchi, A.G.; Wild, C.; Montefalcone, M.; Benincasa, E.; El-Khaled, Y.C. Spatiotemporal Variation in Environmental Key Parameters within Fleshy Red Algae Mats in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceans 2023, 4, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010007

AMA Style

Bianchi AG, Wild C, Montefalcone M, Benincasa E, El-Khaled YC. Spatiotemporal Variation in Environmental Key Parameters within Fleshy Red Algae Mats in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceans. 2023; 4(1):80-91. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bianchi, Alice G., Christian Wild, Monica Montefalcone, Enzo Benincasa, and Yusuf C. El-Khaled. 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Environmental Key Parameters within Fleshy Red Algae Mats in the Mediterranean Sea" Oceans 4, no. 1: 80-91. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop