Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variation in Environmental Key Parameters within Fleshy Red Algae Mats in the Mediterranean Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Need for the Scuba Diving Industry to Interface with Science and Policy: A Case of SIDS Blue Workforce
Previous Article in Journal
Bioerosion Research in the South China Sea: Scarce, Patchy and Unrepresentative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coral-Focused Climate Change Adaptation and Restoration Based on Accelerating Natural Processes: Launching the “Reefs of Hope” Paradigm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wanted Dead or Alive: Skeletal Structure Alteration of Cold-Water Coral Desmophyllum pertusum (Lophelia pertusa) from Anthropogenic Stressors

1
Department of Geology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
2
School of Natural Sciences, Ryan Institute, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
3
Department of Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, D-24148 Kiel, Germany
4
Department of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
5
Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
6
Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
7
Trinity Centre for the Environment, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Oceans 2023, 4(1), 68-79; https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010006
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023

Abstract

:
Ocean acidification (OA) has provoked changes in the carbonate saturation state that may alter the formation and structural biomineralisation of calcium carbonate exoskeletons for marine organisms. Biomineral production in organisms such as cold-water corals (CWC) rely on available carbonate in the water column and the ability of the organism to sequester ions from seawater or nutrients for the formation and growth of a skeletal structure. As an important habitat structuring species, it is essential to examine the impact that anthropogenic stressors (i.e., OA and rising seawater temperatures) have on living corals and the structural properties of dead coral skeletons; these are important contributors to the entire reef structure and the stability of CWC mounds. In this study, dead coral skeletons in seawater were exposed to various levels of pCO2 and different temperatures over a 12-month period. Nanoindentation was subsequently conducted to assess the structural properties of coral samples’ elasticity (E) and hardness (H), whereas the amount of dissolution was assessed through scanning electron microscopy. Overall, CWC samples exposed to elevated pCO2 and temperature show changes in properties which leave them more susceptible to breakage and may in turn negatively impact the formation and stability of CWC mound development.

1. Introduction

Cold-water corals (CWCs) are a key component of deep-sea ecosystems [1] and are known to occur in most of the world’s oceans except for the Bering Sea and high-latitude Arctic regions [2,3]. Lophelia pertusa, formally renamed to Desmophyllum pertusum [4], is a well-distributed scleractinian CWC found in most cold-water marine ecosystems globally, and is a dominant species in the northeast Atlantic Ocean [2]. Cold-water corals such as D. pertusum require calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to construct an aragonite skeleton. Such corals represent a deep-sea biogenic source useful for reconstructing past geochemical proxies [5] and ocean circulation, and have the potential to serve as important carbon sinks [6,7]. Biomineral production in CWCs relies on the availability of CaCO3 in the water column and the ability to sequester ions from seawater or nutrients to form and grow a skeletal structure [8,9]. Desmophyllum pertusum features thick epithecal and exothecal skeletal components with a clear lamellar growth pattern [10]. Ocean acidification (OA) has provoked changes in the carbonate saturation state [11,12] that may alter the formation and structural biomineralisation of CaCO3 exoskeletons for marine organisms [8], and this is concerning for both tropical and CWCs [13]. Little is known about how the microstructure of D. pertusum coral skeletons might be altered in such scenarios, but OA has been reported to decrease breaking strength causing the coral skeleton to become more brittle, leading to the disintegration of both live and dead coral skeletons [9,13,14]. If structural integrity of both live and dead corals is compromised due to OA and/or temperature intensification, there is a potential for framework collapse and loss of habitat complexity [9,15].
Framework-forming CWCs such as D. pertusum produce three-dimensional structures that many organisms use as habitat and nursery grounds, making them biodiversity hotspots [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Cold-water coral colonies are defined in zones (i.e., macrohabitats) that are typically composed of a base of small coral fragments and sediments to large coral rubble, a matrix of sediment-entrained dead coral fragments and branches, followed by a degradation zone [23] of both live and dead coral framework, and an upper layer of about 20 polyp generations of living corals at the top [2,23]. In the dead coral framework, where live corals are sparse, the highest density of associated organisms is found in relation to the reef framework as a whole [23,24]. For example, with reference to North Atlantic CWC provinces, nearly 75% of the CWC colony at the Mingulay Reef Complex off western Scotland is composed of dead coral framework [25]. In the Belgica mound province in the Porcupine Seabight off southwest Ireland, coral mounds were reported to yield 349 species; much of the live coral framework and dead coral rubble was densely colonised with macrobenthic biodiversity, including calcareous sponges [26]. Megafauna such as bryozoans and macroboring fauna including bivalves, sponges, and polychaetes utilise the sediment-filled cavities of dead coral framework [23]. Furthermore, reef fishes such as the blackbelly rosefish Helicolenus dactylopterus, lesser-spotted dogfish Scyliorhinus canicular, and blackmouth catshark Galeus melastomus rely on CWC frameworks for both hunting and spawning grounds, making these reef habitats more valuable as biodiverse ecosystems [23,27].
As an important habitat structuring species [28], it is essential to examine the impact that OA and rising seawater temperatures have not only on living corals but on the structural properties of dead corals that contribute to the formation and stability of CWC carbonate mounds and reefs [9]. Degradation of dead coral framework that is not supported by protective tissue can occur directly through chemical dissolution, or indirectly due to increased bioerosion [29,30,31]. Such degradation can result in increased skeletal porosity and the possibility of habitat complexity loss [9]. This study aims to determine if the structural integrity of the dead coral framework will be affected by increasing OA and seawater temperatures, and to assess the capacity of the dead coral framework to withstand these anthropogenic stressors.

2. Materials and Methods

Coral samples used here were collected during a Norwegian research expedition aboard the R.V. Håkon Mosby from Nakken Reef at a depth of 200–220 m in Norway in 2016 (Figure 1) as part of the “FATE of cold-water corals—drivers of ecosystem change” project funded by the Research Council of Norway. As a follow-on laboratory experiment, this study investigated the impacts of OA and warming on the functioning of CWC ecosystems, including live and dead coral framework, key associated bivalve and sponge species, and changes in nutrient availability to the organisms. The laboratory experiment took place at Austevoll Research Station, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway, where organisms were observed under various treatments of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) and temperature over a 12-month period. The general setup of the OA research facility is a flow-to-waste system consisting of circular fiberglass tanks with slightly conical bottom as described in Andersen et al. [32]. Natural seawater with a salinity of ~35 was pumped from 160 m water depth near the station and adjusted in temperature and pCO2 in overhead tanks (see details of the temperature and pCO2 control in [32]) before being transferred to the experimental tanks. During the FATE project, the following treatments were applied to 45 experimental tanks in total: control or “ambient” at 400 µatm pCO2 and seawater temperature of 8 °C, “high CO2” at 1000 µatm pCO2 and seawater temperature of 8 °C, and “high CO2+T” at 1000 µatm pCO2 and seawater temperature of 11 °C (ambient seabed temperature plus 3 °C increase). In all three temperature and pCO2 combinations, three different feeding regimes were applied (low, ambient, and high food). For this study, only ambient food replicates, i.e., samples from unfiltered water tanks, were used.
Next, freshly dead coral skeletons free from bioerosion were selected and the soft tissue removed by a 10% diluted bleach solution. Following the 12-month experiment described here, two samples were selected at random from each experimental tank (i.e., ambient, high CO2, and high CO2+T) for a total of six samples. Samples were cleaned and checked for integrity, taking note that no degradation due to biological factors was present. Samples were prepared by cutting coral branches at an aspect ratio as close to 1:1 as possible. As coral branches are not uniform and may be tapered, an ideal geometry cannot be achieved. Samples were individually mounted in epoxy resin (Struers EpoFix Kit) and cured in an oven at 30 °C for 24 h. Once cured, samples were cut using a Buehler IsoMet 1000 Precision Cutter (Lake Bluff, IL, USA) low-speed saw to expose a hollow section on the top surface of the mounts. The exposed surfaces of the mounts were further polished (Struers LaboPol-21 polisher with diamond suspension) to a 1 μm finish (Figure 2a). This process creates a planar and highly polished surface suitable for indentation across the section from the outside surface toward the inner surface. An MTS® Nano Indenter® XP (Eden Prairie, MN, USA) fitted with a diamond tip (Figure 2b) was used to assess coral properties to establish elasticity (i.e., stiffness) using Young’s modulus (E) and coral hardness using Vickers hardness (H). Average E and H values were assessed at a nanoindentation depth range of 2000 nm along the solid white areas of the coral for a single coral fragment (data file available in Supplementary Materials). In this study, we consider elasticity as the ability of the sample to resist deformation and return to its original state when a force being applied is removed, while hardness is the threshold to which the sample would become permanently deformed [9]. Six samples of D. pertusum were analysed with a total of 142 indentations.
Following nanoindentation, backscatter scanning electron (BSE) images were captured using the Tescan TIGER MIRA3 (Brno–Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Centre for Microscopy and Analysis at Trinity College Dublin. Prior to imaging, coral samples were carbon coated to avoid excess charged particles. Images were taken at 5 kV with a scanning speed of 6 and were used to detect visual changes in porosity.
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run using JMP® Statistical Discovery Software [33] to determine if there were statistically significant differences between samples taken from each of the three experimental tank treatments (i.e., ambient, high CO2, and high CO2+T) for E and H [8]. Due to the relatively small sample size, a post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) was run to determine how the treatments differed from one another by a pairwise comparison and Shapiro–Wilk (W) was run to check for normality. Porosity was obtained by analysing SEM images along the outer coral wall using ImageJ software [34]. Porosity was calculated from the percentage of the outer wall where visible porosity was observed in the binary image as shown in Figure 3 [35].

3. Results

Both nanoindentation analyses and SEM imaging indicate changes in the structural integrity of the coral skeleton at certain elevated CO2 and temperature conditions (Table 1).
A one-way ANOVA of indentation data showed a statistically significant difference for E (F = 20.328; p < 0.0001). Elasticity (E) significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) in high CO2 samples, while there was no significant difference between ambient and high CO2+T samples (Figure 4a). A significant difference was observed between ambient and high CO2 samples (p < 0.0001) and between high CO2 and high CO2+T samples (p < 0.0001), suggesting that CO2 influences coral elasticity to an extent that caused a structural change in the coral, such as increased porosity (Shapiro–Wilk test for normality passed, p < W = 0.45).
A statistically significant difference was analysed for H (F = 8.989; p < 0.0002); although it was less significant when compared to E. Hardness (H) significantly increased (p < 0.0001 for ambient; p < 0.0004 for high CO2) in high CO2+T samples (Figure 4b). There was no significant difference between ambient and high CO2 samples, but a statistical difference between ambient and high CO2+T (p < 0.0001) and between high CO2 and high CO2+T (p < 0.0008) was observed, suggesting that combined high CO2+T influences coral hardness to an extent (Shapiro–Wilk test for normality passed, p < W = 0.11).
The presence of porosity changes along the outer coral wall can have a large effect that may lead to the coral bending and twisting as water flows around it; surface defects have a strong effect in reducing the strength, especially in a brittle material such as CaCO3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were used to evaluate the microstructure and analyse relative changes in the porosity of the dead coral samples. Visible degradation of the outer coral wall (Figure 5) was observed in both coral samples exposed to high CO2 alone. No degradation was observed in SEM images of the ambient samples.

4. Discussion

Live CWCs are capable of producing calcifying extracellular mucus substances which are considered important in the formation of the thick epithecal skeletal tissue [10]. Once mineralised, the coral skeleton plays an important role in providing a framework for mound formation and stability. From this study, we determined that the structural integrity of the coral skeleton is compromised at certain elevated pCO2 and seawater temperature conditions. Elasticity significantly decreased in samples exposed to the high CO2 variable, meaning that with increased CO2 conditions, the CaCO3 coral skeleton becomes more brittle. Hardness significantly increased in samples exposed to high CO2+T, as shown in Figure 4, leading us to postulate that skeletal deformation resulting from increased hardness may occur at a later stage with longer running experiments, or in natural systems. Since we do not see such changes in samples exposed to high CO2 alone, we suspect that coral hardness is increased with elevated temperatures. Overall, we observe that increasing pCO2 and temperature caused the partial dissolution of the biomineralised skeleton. At higher temperatures, some of the dissolved material may reprecipitate back into the coral which could explain H increasing with a temperature increase [36,37].
Studies analysing the structural properties of biomineralisation of calcifying organisms are relatively novel, and very few have been conducted on CWCs and bivalves. Hennige et al. [14] conducted an experiment on D. pertusum growth and respiration from the Mingulay Reef Complex to various increased CO2 levels and temperature conditions over a 12-month period. They did not find significant impacts of OA and warming on respiration or growth but postulated that to some extent D. pertusum can acclimatise physiologically. However, there was a negative correlation between increasing CO2 levels and breaking strength of roughly 20–30% weakness in areas where coral tissue decreased and left the skeleton exposed. From this, they concluded that the exposed reef bases will become less effective ‘load-bearers’ and will be more susceptible to bioerosion and mechanical damage by the year 2100. In our study, although H is not changed in high CO2 samples, the decrease in E would support the findings by Hennige et al. [14] regarding reduced structural integrity. Hennige et al. [9] further examined the same coral samples as their earlier study, focusing on the porosity of the coral skeleton. Live D. pertusum displayed no loss in porosity except in areas where tissue loss occurred; yet, dead corals had completely increased skeletal porosity of both the inner and outer walls when exposed to increased CO2. “Coralporosis”, as Hennige et al. [9] refer to in their study, as the loss of skeletal strength and/or density quite similar to osteoporosis in bones could occur from decreased structural integrity, leading to framework foundation loss, and ultimately resulting in large-scale habitat loss or prevention of coral mound growth. Our results are similar to these findings of acidification-induced skeletal porosity along the outer walls of dead corals (Figure 5), and further, they validate the mathematical modelling presented by Hennige et al. [9] for stress due to bending from water flow. Although similar in results, the significant differences we present here from increased pCO2 and temperature could be explained by the difference in scenarios of the previous studies (i.e., the experimental setup of our study for high CO2+T was at 1000 µatm at 11 °C versus 750 µatm at 12 °C from Hennige et al. [14].
Wolfram et al. [13] further analysed live coral samples from Hennige et al. [9] with regard to the mechanisms of structural changes under increasing porosity and dissolution underpinning the laboratory experiments with mathematical and computational models. They revealed a compressive strength (462 MPa) and stiffness (45 to 67 GPa) of the skeletal material that is 10 times stronger than concrete. Surprisingly, CWCs seem to retain their skeletal strength despite the loss of stiffness under future ocean conditions. However, their models resulted in a significant increase in coral habitat crumbling from small porosity increases, concluding that OA affects dead coral skeletons through dissolution and porosity, leading to a decrease in thickness of the skeletal wall and ultimately a detriment to the fragility of the exposed coral skeleton [13]. This is further supported by our study showing decreased E (stiffness) and increased porosity under future elevated CO2 conditions. However, again, the increased level of H in high CO2+T we present here contrasts the findings of Wolfram et al. [13], which could again be explained by different crystal arrangements in the corals used in our study.
Similar studies on the biomineralisation and material properties of the common blue mussel Mytilus edulis were conducted by Fitzer et al. [8,38]. Fitzer et al. [38] analysed mussel biomineralisation to determine if there was a present OA threshold or tipping point. Their results showed that shell growth continued with increased pCO2; yet, the microstructure displayed crystallographic disorientation similar to findings in Hennige et al. [14] for the CWC D. pertusum. Following that study, Fitzer et al. [8] analysed E and H for M. edulis and found that under increased OA conditions, the outer calcite shell was more brittle and the inner aragonite shell was softer and less stiff. This showed that even though calcite is the more stable polymorph of CaCO3 [39], similar results were found in D. pertusum with its aragonite skeleton. However, the significance of the pCO2 impact was reduced in M. edulis when a seawater temperature variable was introduced, leading to the conclusion that there may be a threshold that mussels can withstand. Our study presented here displayed similar results of significant increases in E for elevated pCO2 compared with ambient conditions, as well as a reduced impact with the addition of higher seawater temperature. Thus, projected climate change will likely have an impact on shell structure and properties to some extent, in both calcite and aragonite-calcifying marine organisms.
In addition, bioerosion is found to be accelerated under OA both in tropical and CWC reefs, where a simultaneous increase in temperature did not counteract the impact of acidification [29,31]. Accelerated bioerosion will further lead to the degradation and weakening of coral reef frameworks, which will have implications for the biodiversity of these ecosystems. From our results and similar studies, we can therefore conclude that there is concern regarding skeletal structure integrity, possible framework instability, a reduced load-bearing capacity, and susceptibility to greater than normal bioerosion and mechanical damage for CWC reefs in the future if acidification and seawater temperatures continue to increase in our oceans.

5. Conclusions

The shift from a complex habitat comprised of live and dead corals to a less complex habitat comprised of live corals alone is a major threat to CWC ecosystem biodiversity [9]. As previously stated, dead corals provide a suitable framework for macrohabitats, leading to enhanced metabolic activity, high oxygen consumption, and mineralisation of organic matter [40,41] which is vital to reefs as a whole. A continued decrease in coral skeletal structure will ultimately result in a large-scale habitat loss and prevention of future coral mound growth. Further long-term studies and microscopy imaging would provide useful insight to examine the change in the porosity of dead coral framework. Our results suggest that increased OA and rising seawater temperatures will have an impact on the structural integrity of CWC reefs, especially on the outer walls of dead corals. This study highlights the need to further validate CWC skeletal structure alterations on a larger scale with an expanded range of conditions, along with analyses of possible changes in mineralisation and quantifiable reprecipitation from increased temperature through specific laboratory experiments. Modelling such changes may provide a better understanding of how and when these projected impacts will occur.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/oceans4010006/s1, Spreadsheet S1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.T.K.; data curation, E.T.K. and P.J.O.; formal analysis, E.T.K. and P.J.O.; funding acquisition, J.V.B. and Q.G.C.; investigation, E.T.K. and J.V.B.; methodology, E.T.K., J.V.B., D.A.H., D.T. and P.J.O.; resources, D.A.H., D.T. and Q.G.C.; software, E.T.K. and P.J.O.; supervision, Q.G.C.; validation, E.T.K. and Q.G.C.; visualization, E.T.K., J.V.B. and Q.G.C.; writing—original draft, E.T.K.; writing—review and editing, E.T.K., J.V.B., D.A.H., D.T. and Q.G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication has emanated from research supported by a research grant from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant Numbers 13/RC/2092 and 13/RC/2092_P2. Coral samples came from a large-scale laboratory experiment as part of the “FATE of cold-water corals—drivers of ecosystem change” project led by Tina Kutti and funded by the Research Council of Norway Grant Number 244604/E40, which focused on the impacts of ocean acidification and warming on cold-water coral reef communities.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were given for this study by the Trinity College Dublin School of Natural Sciences Research Ethics Committee on 18 November 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Francis Hendron and Maura Morgan from the School of Natural Sciences at Trinity College Dublin for assistance with sample preparation, Paul Guyett from the Centre for Microscopy and Analysis at Trinity College Dublin for assistance with scanning microscopy analyses, and Lydia Whittaker from the Department of Geology at Trinity College Dublin for assistance with porosity calculations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levin, L.A.; Bett, B.J.; Gates, A.R.; Heimbach, P.; Howe, B.M.; Janssen, F.; McCurdy, A.; Ruhl, H.A.; Snelgrove, P.; Stocks, K.I.; et al. Global observing needs in the deep ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Freiwald, A.; Fosså, J.H.; Grehan, A.; Koslow, T.; Roberts, J.M. Cold Water Coral Reefs: Out of Sight, No Longer Out of Mind; Biodiversity Series 22; UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK, 2004; p. 86. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gori, A.; Ferrier-Pagès, C.; Hennige, S.J.; Murray, F.; Rottier, C.; Wicks, L.C.; Roberts, J.M. Physiological response of the cold-water coral Desmophyllum dianthus to thermal stress and ocean acidification. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Addamo, A.M.; Vertino, A.; Stolarski, J.; García-Jiménez, R.; Taviani, M.; Machordom, A. Merging scleractinian genera: The overwhelming genetic similarity between solitary Desmophyllum and colonial Lophelia. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schleinkofer, N.; Raddatz, J.; Freiwald, A.; Evans, D.; Beuck, L.; Rüggeberg, A.; Liebetrau, V. Environmental and biological controls on Na/Ca ratios in scleractinian cold-water corals. Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 3565–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miller, K.J.; Rowden, A.A.; Williams, A.; Häussermann, V. Out of their depth? Isolated deep populations of the cosmopolitan coral Desmophyllum dianthus may be highly vulnerable to environmental change. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Titschack, J.; Fink, H.G.; Baum, D.; Weinberg, C.; Hebbeln, D.; Freiwald, A. Mediterranean cold-water corals—An important regional carbonate factory? Depos. Rec. 2016, 2, 74–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fitzer, S.C.; Zhu, W.; Tanner, K.E.; Phoenix, V.R.; Kamenos, N.A.; Cusack, M. Ocean acidification alters the material properties of Mytilus edilus shells. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 20141227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hennige, S.J.; Wolfram, U.; Wickes, L.; Murray, F.; Roberts, J.M.; Kamenos, N.A.; Schofield, S.; Groetsch, A.; Spiesz, E.M.; Aubin-Tam, M.-E.; et al. Crumbling reefs and cold-water coral habitat loss in a future ocean: Evidence of “coralporosis” as an indicator of habitat integrity. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reitner, J. Calcifying extracellular mucus substances (EMS) of Madrepora oculata—A first geobiological approach. In Cold Water Corals and Ecosystems; Freiwald, A., Roberts, J.M., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cao, L.; Caldeira, K.; Jain, A.K. Effects of carbon dioxide and climate change on ocean acidification and carbonate mineral saturation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, L05607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jurikova, H.; Liebetrau, V.; Raddatz, J.; Fietzke, J.; Trotter, J.; Rocholl, A.; Krause, S.; McCulloch, M.; Rüggeberg, A.; Eisenhauer, A. Boron isotope composition on the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa along the Norwegian margin: Zooming into a potential pH-proxy by combining bulk and high-resolution approaches. Chem. Geol. 2019, 513, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wolfram, U.; Peña Fernández, M.; McPhee, S.; Smith, E.; Beck, R.J.; Shephard, J.D.; Ozel, A.; Erskine, C.; Büscher, J.; Titschack, J.; et al. Multiscale mechanical consequences of ocean acidification for cold-water corals. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hennige, S.J.; Wicks, L.C.; Kamenos, N.A.; Perna, G.; Findlay, H.S.; Roberts, J.M. Hidden impacts of ocean acidification to live an dead coral framework. Proc. Royal Soc. B 2015, 282, 20150990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Büscher, J.V.; Wisshak, M.; Form, A.U.; Titschack, J.; Nachtigall, K.; Riebesell, U. In situ growth and bioerosion rates of Lophelia pertusa in a Norwegian fjord and open shelf cold-water coral habitat. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Colin, C.; Frank, N.; Copard, K.; Douville, E. Neodymium isotopic composition of deep-sea corals from the NE Atlantic: Implications for past hydrological changes during the Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010, 29, 2509–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Copard, K.; Colin, C.; Douville, E.; Freiwald, A.; Gudmundsson, G.; De Mol, B.; Frank, N. Nd isotopes in deep-sea corals in the North-eastern Atlantic. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010, 29, 2499–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falini, G.; Reggi, M.; Fermani, S.; Sparla, F.; Goffredo, S.; Dubinsky, Z.; Levi, O.; Dauphin, Y.; Cuif, J.-P. Control of aragonite deposition in colonial corals by intra-skeletal macromolecules. J. Struct. Biol. 2013, 183, 226–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mouchi, V.; Crowley, Q.G.; Jackson, A.L.; McDermott, F.; Monteys, X.; de Rafélis, M.; Rueda, J.L.; Lartaud, F. Potential seasonal calibration for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction using skeletal microstructures and strontium measurements from the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa. J. Quat. Sci. 2014, 29, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arnaud-Haond, S.; Van den Beld, I.M.J.; Becheler, R.; Orejas, C.; Menot, L.; Frank, N.; Grehan, A.; Bourillet, J.F. Two “pillars” of cold-water coral reefs along Atlantic European margins: Prevalent association of Madrepora oculata with Lophelia pertusa, from reef to colony scale. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2017, 145, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fanelli, E.; Delbono, I.; Ivaldi, R.; Pratellesi, M.; Cocito, S.; Peirano, A. Cold-water coral Madrepora oculata in the eastern Ligurian Sea (NW Mediterranean): Historical and recent findings. Aquat. Conserv. 2017, 27, 965–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mouchi, V.; Vonlanthen, P.; Verrecchia, E.P.; Crowley, Q.C. Multi-scale crystallographic ordering in the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Henry, L.-A.; Roberts, J.M. Global biodiversity in cold-water coral reef ecosystems. In Marine Animal Forests: The Ecology of Benthic Biodiversity Hotspots; Rossi, S., Bramanti, L., Gori, A., del Valle, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mortensen, P.B.; Fosså, J.H. Species diversity and spatial distribution of invertebrates on deep-water Lophelia reefs in Norway. In Proceedings of the 10th International Coral Reef Symposium, Okinawa, Japan, 28 June–2 July 2004; ICRS: Okinawa, Japan, 2006; Volume 1849, p. 1868. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vad, J.; Orejas, C.; Moreno-Navas, J.; Findlay, H.S.; Roberts, J.M. Assessing the living and dead proportions of cold-water coral colonies: Implications for deep-water Marine Protected Area monitoring in a changing ocean. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Henry, L.-A.; Roberts, J.M. Biodiversity and ecological composition of macrobenthos on cold-water coral mounds and adjacent off-mound habitat in the bathyal Porcupine Seabight, NE Atlantic. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2007, 54, 654–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Henry, L.; Navas, J.M.; Hennige, S.; Wicks, L.C.; Roberts, J.M. Shark spawning grounds on cold-water coral reefs: A compelling case for protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 161, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hennige, S.J.; Morrison, C.L.; Form, A.U.; Büscher, J.; Kamenos, N.A.; Roberts, J.M. Self-recognition in corals facilitates deep-sea habitat engineering. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wisshak, M.; Schoenberg, C.H.L.; Form, A.; Freiwald, A. Ocean acidification accelerates reef bioerosion. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Davidson, T.M.; Altieri, A.H.; Ruiz, G.M.; Torchin, M.E. Bioerosion in a changing world: A conceptual framework. Ecol. Lett. 2018, 21, 422–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Büscher, J.V.; Form, A.U.; Wisshak, M.; Kiko, R.; Riebesell, U. Cold-water coral ecosystems under future ocean change: Live coral performance vs. framework dissolution and bioerosion. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2022, 9999, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Andersen, S.; Grefsrud, E.S.; Harboe, T. Effect of increased pCO2 level on early shell development in great scallop (Pecten maximus Lamarck) larvae. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 6161–6184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. JMP® Version 16. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. 2021. Available online: https://www.jmp.com (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  34. Rasband, W.S.; ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2018. Available online: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  35. Sang, P.; Chen, L.-Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Z.-X.; Wang, H.; Lu, S.; Song, D.; Xu, J.-H.; Zhang, L.-C. Particle size-dependent microstructure, hardness and electrochemical corrosion behavior of atmospheric plasma sprayed NiCrBSi coatings. Metals 2019, 9, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Plummer, L.N.; Busenberg, E. The solubilities of calcite, aragonite and vaterite in CO2-H2O solutions between 0 and 90 °C, and an evaluation of the aqueous model for the system CaCO3-CO2-H2O. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1982, 46, 1011–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Burton, E.A.; Walter, L.M. Relative precipitation rates of aragonite and Mg calcite from seawater: Temperature or carbonate ion control? Geology 1987, 15, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fitzer, S.C.; Phoenix, V.R.; Cusack, M.; Kamenos, N.A. Ocean acidification impacts mussel control on biomineralisation. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mucci, A. The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater at various salinities, temperatures, and one atmosphere total pressure. Am. J. Sci. 1983, 283, 780–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. van Oevelen, D.; Duineveld, G.; Lavaleye, M.; Mienis, F.; Soetaert, K.; Heip, C.H.R. The cold-water coral community as a hot spot for carbon cycling on continental margins: A food-web analysis from Rockall Bank (northeast Atlantic). Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009, 54, 1829–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maier, S.R.; Mienis, F.; de Froe, E.; Soetaert, K.; Lavaleye, M.; Duineveld, G.; Beauchard, O.; van der Kaaden, A.; Koch, B.P.; van Oevelen, D. Reef communities associated with ‘dead’ cold-water coral framework drive resource retention and recycling in the deep sea. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2021, 175, 103574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nakken reef off the coast of Norway (59°49′49.1″ N, 5°33′22″ E; red star), a study area where Desmophyllum pertusum samples were collected from a depth of 200–220 m in 2016.
Figure 1. Nakken reef off the coast of Norway (59°49′49.1″ N, 5°33′22″ E; red star), a study area where Desmophyllum pertusum samples were collected from a depth of 200–220 m in 2016.
Oceans 04 00006 g001
Figure 2. Preparation of coral sample (a) Desmophyllum pertusum set in resin, cut and polished with exposed skeleton prior to nanoindentation, and (b) a prepared coral sample in the mount (red circle) of the MTS Nano Indenter® XP (Dublin, Ireland).
Figure 2. Preparation of coral sample (a) Desmophyllum pertusum set in resin, cut and polished with exposed skeleton prior to nanoindentation, and (b) a prepared coral sample in the mount (red circle) of the MTS Nano Indenter® XP (Dublin, Ireland).
Oceans 04 00006 g002
Figure 3. Examples of image transformation from (a) scanning electron microscope image to (b) binary image for porosity calculation using ImageJ [34].
Figure 3. Examples of image transformation from (a) scanning electron microscope image to (b) binary image for porosity calculation using ImageJ [34].
Oceans 04 00006 g003
Figure 4. Statistical analyses (one-way analysis of variance) of indentation data for Desmophyllum pertusum (a) elasticity and (b) hardness from ambient, high CO2, and high CO2+T conditions. High CO2 was significantly different for elasticity and high CO2+T was statistically different for hardness. The grey line running across each figure is the mean of the response. Refer to Table 1 for number of indentations for each of the three experimental treatments.
Figure 4. Statistical analyses (one-way analysis of variance) of indentation data for Desmophyllum pertusum (a) elasticity and (b) hardness from ambient, high CO2, and high CO2+T conditions. High CO2 was significantly different for elasticity and high CO2+T was statistically different for hardness. The grey line running across each figure is the mean of the response. Refer to Table 1 for number of indentations for each of the three experimental treatments.
Oceans 04 00006 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy images for Desmophyllum pertusum samples showing visible material alterations of the outer coral walls for (a) ambient, (b) high CO2,, and (c) high CO2+T samples. Full coral sample images are on the left and the orange inset boxes display zoomed images on the right. Red arrows represent the area of the outer wall where changes in porosity were calculated.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy images for Desmophyllum pertusum samples showing visible material alterations of the outer coral walls for (a) ambient, (b) high CO2,, and (c) high CO2+T samples. Full coral sample images are on the left and the orange inset boxes display zoomed images on the right. Red arrows represent the area of the outer wall where changes in porosity were calculated.
Oceans 04 00006 g005
Table 1. Analysis of Young’s Modulus (E) and Vickers Hardness (H) mean and standard deviation of dead Desmophyllum pertusum samples exposed to various experimental conditions.
Table 1. Analysis of Young’s Modulus (E) and Vickers Hardness (H) mean and standard deviation of dead Desmophyllum pertusum samples exposed to various experimental conditions.
ConditionIndentation (n)E Mean (GPa)E Std. Dev.H Mean (GPa)H Std. Dev.
Ambient4571.72.74.40.5
High CO25466.15.94.40.5
High CO2+T4371.96.14.80.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krueger, E.T.; Büscher, J.V.; Hoey, D.A.; Taylor, D.; O’Reilly, P.J.; Crowley, Q.G. Wanted Dead or Alive: Skeletal Structure Alteration of Cold-Water Coral Desmophyllum pertusum (Lophelia pertusa) from Anthropogenic Stressors. Oceans 2023, 4, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010006

AMA Style

Krueger ET, Büscher JV, Hoey DA, Taylor D, O’Reilly PJ, Crowley QG. Wanted Dead or Alive: Skeletal Structure Alteration of Cold-Water Coral Desmophyllum pertusum (Lophelia pertusa) from Anthropogenic Stressors. Oceans. 2023; 4(1):68-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krueger, Erica Terese, Janina V. Büscher, David A. Hoey, David Taylor, Peter J. O’Reilly, and Quentin G. Crowley. 2023. "Wanted Dead or Alive: Skeletal Structure Alteration of Cold-Water Coral Desmophyllum pertusum (Lophelia pertusa) from Anthropogenic Stressors" Oceans 4, no. 1: 68-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop