Next Article in Journal
Scanning Electron Microscopy of Conjunctival Scraping: Our Experience in the Diagnosis of Infectious Keratitis with Negative Culture Tests
Previous Article in Journal
A Combined Surgical Approach for the Treatment of a Sino-Naso-Orbital Glomangiopericytoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Risk of the Development of Secondary Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Pediatric Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review

1
Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, 122 43 Egaleo, Greece
2
Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023

Abstract

:
Background: Secondary PTSD is defined as the natural, consequential behaviors and emotions that result from knowledge about a traumatic event experienced by a significant other deriving from working with suffering individuals. Pediatric health providers with symptoms of PTSD report problems with relationships and general life dissatisfaction as well as and anxiety, depression and burnout syndrome. Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to estimate the risk of developing secondary PTSD among pediatric health care providers as well as all additional contributing factors. In more detail, we investigated the PTSD symptomatology between pediatric health care providers and the extent to which parameters such as the job, gender, department and other factors had an impact on the mental health status of pediatric health care providers. Methodology: We searched all published English papers in PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library from September to November 2022. We excluded reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as letters to editors. From a total of 748 papers, we included only 12 research articles that met the admission criteria. Results: According to our results, the prevalence of secondary PTSD ranges from 13% to 94%. Burnout, nurses, the female gender, intensive care units, past traumatic life events and a psychiatric history identified as factors contributing to the development of secondary PTSD. Conclusions: Health policy-makers should take the specificity in the working environment of the pediatric sector seriously into consideration, especially emergency departments.

1. Introduction

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been recognized for centuries as a stress reaction, but only in 1980 was it accepted as a clinical diagnosis [1]. According to the American Psychiatric Association [2], PTSD is a psychiatric disorder that can occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic events such as natural disasters, serious accidents, terrorist acts, war/combat or rape, or who have been threatened with death, sexual violence or serious injury. The individual re-experiences the event, avoids the stimuli associated with the traumatizing event and experiences increased arousal.
PTSD can occur in all people of any ethnicity, nationality or culture and at any age. More than half of the adult population has been exposed to a severe stressor at some point during the course of their lives [3]. PTSD affects approximately 3.5% of US adults every year and it is estimated that almost one in eleven people will be diagnosed with PTSD in their lifetime [4]. It is estimated that 1in 11 people of all ages will be diagnosed with PTSD in their life [3]. However, women are twice as likely as men to have PTSD because certain types of trauma such as sexual assault are more common among them [5]. The prevalence of PTSD in the USA has been reported to be around 10% for women and 5% for men [6].
It is possible for almost everyone to develop a post-traumatic stress reaction shortly after being exposed to severe stressors. Most stress reactions usually diminish in a few days, weeks or months without any intervention. In several cases of those exposed, the outcome has been increased resilience, acceptance and post-traumatic growth [7]. The risk of developing PTSD depends on several factors such as the nature of the critical incident, the individual’s personality, the life history or the events that occurred in the aftermath of the trauma [8]. In many cases, a co-morbidity between PTSD and disorders such as depression, anxiety and substance abuse has been reported [7]. However, social and emotional support seems to be protective against the development of PTSD [9]. The most stressful jobs are the ones focusing on human health care, especially pediatric health care. Consequently, work stress can affect the physical and emotional well-being of employees by reducing their efficiency; at the same time, it has a negative impact on their social quality of life [10]. Several studies on the secondary traumatization of health care professionals have been published so far. Secondary PTSD is defined as the natural, consequential behaviors and emotions that result from knowledge about a traumatic event experienced by a significant other deriving from working with suffering individuals [11]. Individuals with evidence of secondary PTSD have PTSD-like symptoms, as determined by the Post-Traumatic Stress Scale [12] that investigates symptoms in the previous week. However, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 [2], PTSD can also be caused after workplace exposure; thus, the PCL-5 scale is considered to be appropriate [13]. Much of the existing literature has focused on secondary PTSD rather than PTSD among pediatric health providers. Overcoming these differences and the effect of daily exposure to psychological trauma could have a significant impact on the well-being of each worker and, therefore, on the professional care of children. Symptoms of secondary PTSD in pediatric health providers include thinking of patient situations, avoiding situations that remind them of the workplace with distressed patients and feelings of arousal such as jumpiness or sleeping disturbances with a traumatized patient [12].
Plenty of children are presented for medical care (from illness and injury due to traumatic events such as violence and natural disasters) and medical professionals and support staff experience multiple trauma symptoms as they face life-threatening conditions or live in abusive environments. This continuous contact with a traumatized population brings to light the issue of secondary traumatization. Health providers with symptoms of PTSD report problems with relationships and general life dissatisfaction as well as anxiety, depression and burnout syndrome [14,15]. These diminish the staff morale, productivity and quality of care and increase the danger of medication errors, patient falls and other tools of patient morbidity [16,17,18]. Situations involving children are often considered to have a greater psychological impact; thus, pediatric workers may be at a particular risk of PTSD [11]. The literature has proven that PICUs and emergency departments are considered to be risk factors for the development of PTSD, given the high morbidity and mortality from which they are characterized [15,19]. In particular, intensive care units are stressful sources not only for patients and their families, but also for their staff; there is a proportionately greater amount of work stress than most professions [16]. However, the prolonged professional stress of professionals usually causes emotional exhaustion. Symptoms of depression, high rates of sickness absence, substance use (drugs or alcohol) or chronic physical pain have also been reported among unit staff. It is noteworthy that a large percentage of doctors (approximately 400) die from suicide each year, twice the rate of the general population [17]. Emergency departments are high-stress workplaces, similar to intensive care units. The staff who work there care for patients with trauma and life-threatening conditions such as strokes, heart attacks, burns, traffic accidents and violent accidents [18]. In addition, staff often have to provide care from one patient to another, with no time to process stressful events or engage in their own self-care. At the same time, they appear to have the highest rate of physical assaults of any department in the hospital [19]. Therefore, caring for dying patients is a daily routine for intensive care unit and emergency room staff. In addition to the above factors, it appears that perceived non-job satisfaction, burnout, compassion fatigue and the female gender [20] significantly contribute to the development of post-traumatic symptoms [11]. Given that managing the above stressful environments can be even more complex for providers when treating and caring for pediatric patients because the loss of a child is an extremely tragic event, we hypothesized that pediatric health professionals face a high risk of developing post-traumatic symptomatology. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to estimate the risk of developing secondary PTSD among pediatric health care providers as well as all additional contributing factors.

2. Methods

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of developing PTSD among pediatric health care providers. In more detail, we investigated the PTSD symptomatology between pediatric health care providers and the extent to which parameters such as the job, gender, department and other factors had an impact on the mental health status of pediatric health care providers. To achieve the above objective, a systematic review of relevant studies was carried out based on Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline Cochrane Library and Scopus.

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

This study had specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. For example, we included research articles that investigated the relationship between pediatric health care providers and PTSD or secondary traumatization. This study followed the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [21], the PROSPERO Systematic Review registration number: 401443. However, we excluded papers that were review articles such as reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and letters to editors. We included original research articles (cross-sectional and cohort studies). We included health care providers who did not work with pediatric patients and did not report data on PTSD.

2.2. Search Strategy

We searched all published English papers in PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and Scopus from September to November 2022. The years of publication ranged from 1999 to 2021.The terms used were: ((((((((Pediatric health care providers) OR (pediatric health care professionals)) OR (pediatric caregivers)) AND (secondary PTSD))) OR (PTSD)) OR (secondary traumatization)) OR (exposure to work related trauma)) OR (mental health). Firstly, we evaluated the titles and the abstracts. The full texts of the paper were then evaluated again using the eligibility inclusion and exclusion criteria. The first search found 748 papers. After we rejected double studies, other titles and papers that did not have a text, 141 papers remained to be evaluated. In addition, we rejected 123 papers due to them being reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses; 6 papers were written in a language other than English. Finally, 12 studies were included in the review (Figure 1).

2.3. Methodological Quality Evaluation of the Studies

The quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [22] was used to assess the quality of the studies (Table 1). Each question of the tool can be answered with “Yes”, “No” or “Not applicable”, investigating whether the criteria were met foreach paper. In more detail, the criteria consisted of 14 questions, which investigated: (1) the clarity of the research question; (2) the type of the study population; (3) the participation rate of the study population; (4) the predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria of the participants; (5) the justification of the sample size; (6) if the exposure was measured before the outcome; (7) if there was sufficient time between the exposure and the outcome; (8) if the study examined different levels of exposure depending on the outcome; (9) the clearly defined measures of exposure; (10) if the exposure was assessed more than once over time; (11) clarity of the outcome measures; (12) whether the outcome assessors were blinded to the exposure status; (13) the sample loss to follow-up; and (14) the confounding variables that were measured and statistically adjusted. However, this tool was not used to derive an overall score, but mainly to examine the overall quality of a study and the risk of bias.

3. Results

All studies were cross-sectional and the majority of these took place in the USA (Table 2). All articles provided data on the exposure of pediatric health care providers to work-related trauma. Trauma exposure occurred in pediatric hospitals, pediatric intensive care units, neonatal intensive care units, pediatric units, pediatric trauma services, protective services and pediatric emergency departments.
Diagnostic tools were also used on all health care providers for the diagnosis of PTSD. We also extracted information on the additional risk factors that led to secondary PTSD.
According to our results, the prevalence of secondary PTSD ranged from 13% to 94%. The majority of studies mainly included nurses [11,19,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] and physicians [27,28,34]. Only one study included child protective workers [23] and three studies investigated secondary PTSD [19,34,35]; the other studies additionally examined burnout [11,27,28,29,30,31,32,34], compassion fatigue [27,28,29,30] and other outcomes relevant to a secondary trauma such as distress, depression, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism symptoms [23]. However, the study of Beaudoin [32] did not specify the specialty of the primary caregivers. They also did not specify the research methodology they followed.
We identified several additional factors that could contribute to the development of secondary PTSD or PTSD. One study [23] showed that being assaulted or the threat of being assaulted on the job, the female gender and working more than 40 h a week affected the appearance of PTSD. Another study [24] reported that several years in the direct care of pediatric patients took a psychological toll on the health provider. On the other hand, two studies reported that fewer years of work was a stronger factor [29,30]. Higher rates of affectively mediated empathy were also associated with secondary PTSD according to the study of Robins et al. [24]. This was in contrast to the research of Ratrout et al. [20], which showed that lower rates of empathy were largely responsible for secondary PTSD symptoms. In addition, the job of nursing was considered to be a strong risk factor in two studies [27,31] where as one study identified the job of doctors [29]. A strong correlation was also observed between PTSD symptoms and burnout as well as low job satisfaction according to the study of Sekol et al. [26]. Working in a PICU was also more stressful than working in other pediatric departments; thus, a PICU was considered to be an aggravating factor [31,32]. Finally, a history of traumas [20], anxiety, depression [11], drinking alcohol [29] and less a problem-focused coping style [31] in pediatric care providers appeared to be vulnerability factors for the development of secondary PTSD.
Table 2. Studies included in the review.
Table 2. Studies included in the review.
Author/YearDesignNDataExposureInstrumentsOutcomesAdditional Risk Factors
Cornille 1999 [23]
USA
Cross-sectional study183 child protective workersChild protective service (CPS) in a southern stateChild abuse trauma1. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) [33]
2. Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) [34]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. Distress
3. Depression
4. Phobic anxiety
5. Paranoid ideation
6. Psychoticism symptoms
1. Assault or threat of assault on the job
2. Female gender
3. Work hours > 40 per week
Robins 2009 [24]
USA
Cross-sectional study314 health care professionals
(86 physicians, 136 nurses, 43 mental health practitioners and 49 allied health)
The Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaExposure to secondary trauma 1. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) [35]
2. Spiritual Involvement Beliefs Scale (SIBS) [36]
3. Brief COPE [37]
4. Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Test
(CSFT) [38]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. Compassion fatigue
3. Burnout
1. Several years in direct care
2. Higher rates of affectively mediated empathy
3. Nurses
Meadors 2010 [25]
USA
Cross-sectional study167 pediatric health care providers
(nurses, chaplains and physicians)
Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU),
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and/or pediatric unit (PEDS), Carolina
Exposure to secondary trauma1. The Impact of Event Scale [34]
2. Professional Quality of Life Scale, version 5 (ProQOL-V5) [39]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. PTSD
3. Burnout
4. Compassion fatigue
N/A
Czaja 2011
[11]
USA
Cross-sectional study173 nurses of general medical, surgical and oncology wards as well as the pediatric intensive care unit and emergency roomChildren’s hospital with a wide referral base and level 1 trauma servicesExposure to secondary trauma1. The Post-Traumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) [40]
2. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [41]
3. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) [42]
1. PTSD
2. Burnout
1. Anxiety
2. Depression
Sekol
2014
[26]
USA
Cross-sectional study240 registered nurses working in surgical, medical, critical care and hematology/oncology unitsTertiary acute care pediatric hospital, CaliforniaExposure to secondary trauma1. Professional Quality of Life Scale, version 5 (ProQOL-V5) [39]
2. Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction
(BIAJS) [43]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. Burnout
3. Compassion satisfaction
1. 5–9 years of experience in the surgical unit
2. High burnout levels
3. Low job satisfaction
Berger
2015
[27]
USA
Cross-sectional study239 registered nurses working in pediatric unitsA system of 5 hospitals that included an urban pediatric tertiary care teaching hospitalExposure to secondary trauma1. Professional Quality of Life Scale, version 5 (ProQOL-V5) [39]1. Secondary PTSD
2. Burnout
3. Compassion satisfaction
1. Caucasian
2. Work experience ≤ 5 years
Branch
2015
[28]
USA
Cross-sectional study296 staff nurses, advanced practice nurses, social workers, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, psychologists and child life therapistsSt. Louis Children’s HospitalExposure to secondary trauma1. Professional Quality of Life Scale, version 5 (ProQOL-V5) [39]1. Secondary PTSD
2. Burnout
3. Compassion satisfaction
1. Nurses who work in the PICU
Colville
2017
[29]
Cross-sectional study195 PICU staff and 164 ICU staff3 adult ICUs and 4 PICUsExposure to secondary trauma1. Brief Resilience Scale [44]
2. Maslach Burnout Inventory [42]
3. Trauma Screening Questionnaire [5]
4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [41]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. Burnout
1. Work in PICU
2. Doctors
3. Drink alcohol
Kellogg
2018
[30]
USA
Cross-sectional study338 certified pediatric nursesAll pediatric nursesExposure to secondary trauma1. Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale [12]
2. Brief COPE [45]
3. Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Short Form [46]
1. Secondary PTSDN/A
Rodríguez-Rey
2019
[31]
Spain
Cross-sectional study298 PICU staff members (physicians, nurses and nursing assistants) and 189 professionals working in non-critical pediatric units (physicians, nurses and nursing assistants)9 hospitalsExposure to secondary trauma1. Brief Resilience Scale [44]
2. Coping Strategies Questionnaire for healthcare providers [47]
3. Maslach Burnout Inventory [42]
4. Trauma Screening Questionnaire [48]
1. Secondary PTSD
2. Burnout
1. Individuals who used a problem-focused coping style less
Ratrout
2020
[20]
Jordan
Cross-sectional study202 nurses8 emergency departments in JordanExposure to secondary trauma1. Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale [12]
2. Life Events Checklist, Fifth Version (LEC-5) [49]
3. Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) [50]
4. The Scale of Perceived Organizational
Support [51]
5. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social
Support [52]
6. Coping Inventory Scale [53]
1. Secondary PTSD1. History of trauma
2. Low empathy
Beaudoin 2021
[32]
Canada
Cross-sectional study168 primary caregivers of pediatric neurosurgical patientsPerson and online surveyExposure to secondary trauma1. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5
(PCL-5) [13]
1. PTSD1. Greater number of surgeries
N/A: Not applicable.

4. Discussion

The aim of this systematic review was to estimate the risk of developing secondary PTSD among pediatric health care providers as well as all the additional contributing factors. From the results, it appeared that there was a direct relationship between PTSD and burnout. It is known that hazardous occupations exposed to continuous trauma have an increased risk of developing secondary PTSD [54]. Burnout appears to be a contributing factor in the development of PTSD; therefore, continuous and chronic work stress can be considered to be a predictor of PTSD [55]. The results of this review also showed that pediatric health care providers who worked in intensive care units were more at risk of developing PTSD. In one study [56], the incidence rate of PTSD was 22.38% among ICU nurses as nurses were more prone to psychological trauma due to heavy workloads, sudden emergencies or bullying by colleagues. Another study showed that approximately half of ICU nurses met the criteria for PTSD [57].
In addition, our results showed that nurses were more likely to suffer from PTSD. Dealing with stress has always been part of the nursing job. A survey [58] found that more than 50% of nurses reported feeling exhausted (72%), overwhelmed (64%), irritable (57%) and stressed and could not relax (57%) as a result of their job. According to our results, women were more susceptible to the development of PTSD. According to the literature, women show a higher risk of developing PTSD compared with men due to hormonal changes [59] and childbirth experiences [60].
Anxiety and depression are often co-occurring disorders of PTSD [61]. However, we did not know whether these disorders existed beforehand or were a result. A history of traumatic life events may also indicate an older PTSD. Older traumas can be revived under appropriate conditions and create a new PTSD [62]. Regarding the coping style, it is known that problem-focused coping strategies aim to change or eliminate a stressor [63]; our results confirmed this. Therefore, pediatric health care providers who do not use problem-focused strategies are at a greater risk of stress-related illnesses than those who use emotion-focused strategies [64].
Our results also indicated that empathy plays a catalytic role in the development of PTSD [19,27]. As our results were equivocal, it is important to emphasize that high or low levels of empathy were directly related to PTSD. For example, according to other studies, empathic abilities were reduced in PTSD because there were difficulties in exchanging emotions [65]. Nevertheless, higher levels of empathy—which may demonstrate a greater emotional sensitivity—predispose a person to more severe PTSD symptoms [66]. Finally, alcohol use and PTSD were related. In more detail, people who had drinking problems were more likely to have PTSD; conversely, people with PTSD more often had drinking problems [5].
This study had a few strengths and limitations. A significant strength was the fact that it was the first study to include pediatric professionals of all specialties. The important limitation concerned the design of the studies, which were all cross-sectional. Therefore, we do not know the progression of symptoms over time and the possible interventions that may increase or decrease post-traumatic symptomatology.

5. Conclusions

The presence of secondary traumatic stress in health care providers was reported in all studies included in this systematic review. The mental injury caused to pediatric health professionals is special and needs substantial treatment. Health policy-makers should take the specificity in the working environment of the pediatric sector seriously into consideration, especially emergency and PICU departments. We recommend frequent assessments of the mental health of employees as well as more time off for rest, support from mental health specialists and a change of department in cases where the employee wishes it or shows symptoms of mental injury. Further studies are needed in more countries to prospectively assess all risk factors and also to be able to assess post-traumatic symptoms after appropriate interventions. Experimental studies and/or clinical trials are necessary to increase the possibility of conducting meta-analyses. In particular, the special population of nurses that appeared to be affected more than other professional groups should be investigated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.R. and E.A.; methodology, N.R.; validation, A.S., M.D. and C.N.; investigation, N.R.; data curation, E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.R.; writing—review and editing, E.A.; supervision, E.A., A.S. and M.D; project administration, N.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayers, S.; Wright, D.B.; Thornton, A. Development of a measure of postpartum PTSD: The city birth trauma scale. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. American Psychiatric Association. What is Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)? Available online: https://www.psychiatry.org:443/patients-families/ptsd/what-is-ptsd (accessed on 21 January 2023).
  4. Treatment (US), C. for S. A. Exhibit 1.3-4, DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for PTSD. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207191/ (accessed on 29 December 2020).
  5. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ). Available online: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/screens/tsq.asp (accessed on 22 December 2022).
  6. Wittchen, H.-U.; Gloster, A.; Beesdo, K.; Schönfeld, S.; Perkonigg, A. Posttraumatic stress disorder: Diagnostic and epidemiological perspectives. CNS Spectr. 2009, 14, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedman, M.J.; Keane, T.M.; Resick, P.A. Handbook of PTSD: Science and Practice, 1st ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; p. 592. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ozer, E.J.; Best, S.R.; Lipsey, T.L.; Weiss, D.S. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2003, 129, 52–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, H. Association between social support and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among Chinese patients with ovarian cancer: A multiple mediation model. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koinis, A.; Giannou, V.; Drantaki, V.; Angelaina, S.; Stratou, E.; Saridi, M. The impact of healthcare workers job environment on their mental-emotional health. Coping strategies: The case of a local general hospital. Health Psychol. Res. 2015, 3, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Czaja, A.S.; Moss, M.; Mealer, M. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among pediatric acute care nurses. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2012, 27, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bride, B.E.; Robinson, M.M.; Yegidis, B.; Figley, C.R. Development and validation of the secondary traumatic stress scale. Res. Soc. Work. Pract. 2004, 14, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. PTSD: National Center for PTSD. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Available online: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp (accessed on 29 December 2020).
  14. Mealer, M.L.; Shelton, A.; Berg, B.; Rothbaum, B.; Moss, M. Increased Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Critical Care Nurses. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 175, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mealer, M.; Jones, J.; Newman, J.; McFann, K.K.; Rothbaum, B.; Moss, M. The presence of resilience is associated with a healthier psychological profile in intensive care unit (ICU) nurses: Results of a national survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2012, 49, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Barlow, K.M.; Zangaro, G.A. Meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of the anticipated turnover scale across studies of registered nurses in the united states. J. Nurs. Manag. 2010, 18, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jones, C.B. Revisiting nurse turnover costs: Adjusting for inflation. J. Nurs. Adm. 2008, 38, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Waldman, J.D.; Kelly, F.; Arora, S.; Smith, H.L. The shocking cost of turnover in health care. Health Care Manag. Rev. 2004, 29, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ratrout, H.F.; Hamdan-Mansour, A.M. Secondary traumatic stress among emergency nurses: Prevalence, predictors, and consequences. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2020, 26, e12767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sasidharan, S.; Dhillon, H.S. Intensive care unit stress and burnout among health-care workers: The wake-up call is blaring! Indian J. Psychiatry 2021, 63, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krisberg, K. Concerns grow about burnout and stress in health care workers. Am. J. Public Health 2018, 108, 1576. [Google Scholar]
  22. Trudgill, D.I.N.; Gorey, K.M.; Donnelly, E.A. Prevalent posttraumatic stress disorder among emergency department personnel: Rapid systematic review. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2020, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Crilly, J.; Chaboyer, W.; Creedy, D. Violence towards emergency department nurses by patients. Accid. Emerg. Nurs. 2004, 12, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. NHLBI; NIH. Study Quality Assessment Tools. Available online: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (accessed on 8 October 2022).
  26. Cornille, T.A.; Meyers, T.W. Secondary traumatic stress among child protective service workers: Prevalence, severity and predictive factors. Traumatology 1999, 5, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Robins, P.M.; Meltzer, L.; Zelikovsky, N. The experience of secondary traumatic stress upon care providers working within a children’s hospital. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2009, 24, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meadors, P.; Lamson, A.; Swanson, M.; White, M.; Sira, N. Secondary traumatization in pediatric healthcare providers: Compassion fatigue, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Omega 2010, 60, 103–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sekol, M.A.; Kim, S.C. Job satisfaction, burnout, and stress among pediatric nurses in various specialty units at an acute care hospital. J. Nurs. Educ. Pract. 2014, 4, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berger, J.; Polivka, B.; Smoot, E.A.; Owens, H. Compassion fatigue in pediatric nurses. J. Pediatr. Nurs. Nurs. Care Child. Fam. 2015, 30, e11–e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Branch, C.; Klinkenberg, D. Compassion fatigue among pediatric healthcare providers. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2015, 40, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Colville, G.A.; Smith, J.G.; Brierley, J.; Citron, K.; Nguru, N.M.; Shaunak, P.D.; Tam, O.; Perkins-Porras, L. Coping with staff burnout and work-related posttraumatic stress in intensive care. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 18, e267–e273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kellogg, M.B.; Knight, M.; Dowling, J.S.; Crawford, S.L. Secondary traumatic stress in pediatric nurses. J. Pediatr. Nurs. Nurs. Care Child. Fam. 2018, 43, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rodríguez-Rey, R.; Palacios, A.; Alonso-Tapia, J.; Pérez, E.; Álvarez, E.; Coca, A.; Mencía, S.; Marcos, A.; Mayordomo-Colunga, J.; Fernández, F.; et al. Burnout and posttraumatic stress in pediatric critical care personnel: Prediction from resilience and coping styles. Aust. Crit. Care. 2019, 32, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Beaudoin, W.; Moore, H.; Bliss, L.; Souster, J.; Mehta, V. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in caregivers of pediatric neurosurgical patients. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2021, 37, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Davis, M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 44, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hatch, R.L.; Burg, M.A.; Naberhaus, D.S.; Hellmich, L.K. The spiritual involvement and beliefs scale. Development and testing of a new instrument. J. Fam. Pract. 1998, 46, 476–486. [Google Scholar]
  38. Carver, C.S. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int. J. Behav. Med. 1997, 4, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self-Test (CFS). Available online: https://nwdrugtaskforce.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Compassion-Fatigue-Handout-6.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  40. Weiss, D.S. Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R): (567532010-001). Available online: https://www.aerztenetz-grafschaft.de/download/IES-R-englisch-5-stufig.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  41. ProQOL. ProQOL Manual. Available online: https://proqol.org/proqol-manual (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  42. Foa, E.B.; Cashman, L.; Jaycox, L.; Perry, K. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The posttraumatic diagnostic scale. Psychol. Assess. 1997, 9, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zigmond, A.S.; Snaith, R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983, 67, 361–370. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x (accessed on 18 December 2022). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Leiter, M.P. Job Burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Thompson, E.R.; Phua, F.T.T. A brief index of affective job satisfaction. Group Organ. Manag. 2012, 37, 275–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Smith, B.W.; Dalen, J.; Wiggins, K.; Tooley, E.; Christopher, P.; Bernard, J. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the Ability to bounce back. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2008, 15, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. García, F.E.; Barraza-Peña, C.G.; Wlodarczyk, A.; Alvear-Carrasco, M.; Reyes-Reyes, A. Psychometric properties of the brief-COPE for the evaluation of coping strategies in the Chilean population. Psicol. ReflexãoCrítica 2018, 31, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crowne, D.P.; Marlowe, D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Consult. Psychol. 1960, 24, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Alonso-Tapia, J.; Rodríguez-Rey, R.; Garrido-Hernansaiz, H.; Ruiz, M.; Nieto, C. Coping assessment from the perspective of the person-situation interaction: Development and validation of the situated coping questionnaire for adults (SCQA). Psicothema 2016, 28, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brewin, C.R.; Rose, S.; Andrews, B.; Green, J.; Tata, P.; McEvedy, C.; Turner, S.; Foa, E.B. Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 2002, 181, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. PTSD: National Center for PTSD. Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Available online: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/te-measures/life_events_checklist.asp (accessed on 6 February 2021).
  52. Spreng, R.N.; McKinnon, M.C.; Mar, R.A.; Levine, B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire. J. Pers. Assess. 2009, 91, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Statistics Solutions. The Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS). Available online: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-survey-instruments/the-survey-of-perceived-organizational-support-spos/ (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  54. Measures Library. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Available online: https://elcentro.sonhs.miami.edu/research/measures-library/mspss/index.html (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  55. Rahe, R.H.; Tolles, R.L. The brief stress and coping inventory: A useful stress management instrument. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2002, 9, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jo, I.; Lee, S.; Sung, G.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.; Park, J.; Lee, K. Relationship between burnout and PTSD symptoms in firefighters: The moderating effects of a sense of calling to firefighting. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2018, 91, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Regehr, C.; Hemsworth, D.; Leslie, B.; Howe, P.; Chau, S. Predictors of post-traumatic distress in child welfare workers: A linear structural equation model. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2004, 26, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, P.; Kuang, H.; Tan, H. The occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), job burnout and its influencing factors among ICU nurses. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 8302–8308. [Google Scholar]
  59. Advisory Board. Why 1 in 4 Nurses Suffers from PTSD (and How To Help Them). Available online: https://www.advisory.com/Daily-Briefing/2019/05/15/nurse-trauma (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  60. Bryant-Genevier, J.; Rao, C.Y.; Lopes-Cardozo, B.; Kone, A.; Rose, C.; Thomas, I.; Orquiola, D.; Lynfield, R.; Shah, D.; Freeman, L.; et al. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation among state, tribal, local, and terri-torial public health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, March–April 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Olff, M. Sex and gender differences in post-traumatic stress disorder: An update. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2017, 8 (Suppl. 4). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Orovou, E.; Dagla, M.; Iatrakis, G.; Lykeridou, A.; Tzavara, C.; Antoniou, E. Correlation between kind of cesarean section and posttraumatic stress disorder in Greek women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Flory, J.D.; Yehuda, R. Comorbidity between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder: Alternative explanations and treatment considerations. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 17, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dugal, C.; Bigras, N.; Godbout, N.; Bélanger, C. Childhood interpersonal trauma and its repercussions in adulthood: An analysis of psychological and interpersonal sequelae. In A Multidimensional Approach to Post-Traumatic Stress Dissorder; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. ScienceDirect Topics. Problem-Focused Coping-An Overview. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/problem-focused-coping (accessed on 27 December 2022).
  66. Dixon, T. Emotion-Focused vs. Problem-Focused Coping Strategies. IB Psychology. 2022. Available online: https://www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2022/03/14/emotion-focused-vs-problem-focused-coping-strategies/ (accessed on 27 December 2022).
Figure 1. Flow chart of the included studies.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the included studies.
Reports 06 00009 g001
Table 1. Methodological quality of the studies [22].
Table 1. Methodological quality of the studies [22].
CriteriaCornille 1999
[23]
Robins 2009
[24]
Meadors 2010
[25]
Czaja 2011
[11]
Sekol
2014
[26]
Berger 2015
[27]
Branch
2015
[28]
Colville
2017
[29]
Kellogg 2018
[30]
Rodríguez-Rey 2019
[31]
Ratrout
2020
[20]
Beaudoin 2021
[32]
1. Research question clearly statedYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
2.Study population clearly specified and definedYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
3. Participation rate of eligible people at least 50%YesYesYesNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYesYes
4. Same or similar study population and prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteriaYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
5. Sample size justificationNoYesNoNoYesNoYesYesYesYesYesNo
6. Exposure to interest measured prior to the outcomeYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
7. Sufficient timeframe between exposure and outcomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
8. Different levels of the exposure related to the outcome examinedYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesN/AN/AN/AN/A
9. Clearly defined exposure measuresYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
10. Exposure assessed more than once over timeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
11. Outcome measures clearly definedYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
12. Outcome assessors blinded to the exposure statusN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
13. Loss to follow-up after baseline of 20% or lessN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
14. Confounding variables measured and statistically adjusted YesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYes
Yes: the criterion was met; No: the criterion was not met; N/A: the criterion was not applicable due to the study design.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rigas, N.; Soldatou, A.; Dagla, M.; Nanou, C.; Antoniou, E. The Risk of the Development of Secondary Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Pediatric Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review. Reports 2023, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports6010009

AMA Style

Rigas N, Soldatou A, Dagla M, Nanou C, Antoniou E. The Risk of the Development of Secondary Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Pediatric Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review. Reports. 2023; 6(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports6010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rigas, Nikolaos, Alexandra Soldatou, Maria Dagla, Christina Nanou, and Evangelia Antoniou. 2023. "The Risk of the Development of Secondary Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Pediatric Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review" Reports 6, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports6010009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop