Next Article in Journal
Process Map Definition for Laser Metal Deposition of VDM Alloy 780 on the 316L Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Twin Based SUDIHA Architecture to Smart Shopfloor Scheduling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Dimopoulos et al. Multi-Response Optimization of Ti6Al4V Support Structures for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 22

1
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
2
TWI Hellas, Leof. Kifisias 280, 152 32 Chalandri, Greece
3
TWI Ltd., Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB 21 6AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7(3), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7030085
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 26 April 2023

Error in Table

In the original publication [1], there is an error in Table 9. The Lower Limit of Laser Speed should be 1000 mm/s, not 100 mm/s. The corrected “Table 9” appears below.
Table 9. Criteria constraints.
Table 9. Criteria constraints.
NameGoalLower LimitUpper Limit
A: Tooth Heightin range1 mm4 mm
B: Tooth Top Lengthin range0.05 mm0.3 mm
C: X, Y Hatchingin range0.5 mm2.5 mm
D: Laser Speedin range1000 mm/s1800 mm/s
Support Volumeminimize1 (normalised)5 (normalised)
Support RemovalminimizeCondition 1Condition 2
Warping Deformationminimize0.13 mm1.5 mm

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in “Figure 12” as published. The value “1.13” in the warping deformation chart should be replaced with the value “0.13”. The corrected “Figure 12” appears below.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Dimopoulos, A.; Zournatzis, I.; Gan, T.-H.; Chatzakos, P. Multi-Response Optimization of Ti6Al4V Support Structures for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 12. Graphical representation of the selected optimal solutions for 0°, 22.5°, and 45° overhangs.
Figure 12. Graphical representation of the selected optimal solutions for 0°, 22.5°, and 45° overhangs.
Jmmp 07 00085 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dimopoulos, A.; Zournatzis, I.; Gan, T.-H.; Chatzakos, P. Correction: Dimopoulos et al. Multi-Response Optimization of Ti6Al4V Support Structures for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 22. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7030085

AMA Style

Dimopoulos A, Zournatzis I, Gan T-H, Chatzakos P. Correction: Dimopoulos et al. Multi-Response Optimization of Ti6Al4V Support Structures for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 22. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2023; 7(3):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7030085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dimopoulos, Antonios, Ilias Zournatzis, Tat-Hean Gan, and Panagiotis Chatzakos. 2023. "Correction: Dimopoulos et al. Multi-Response Optimization of Ti6Al4V Support Structures for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Systems. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2023, 7, 22" Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 7, no. 3: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7030085

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop