Next Article in Journal
Priority Activities for Implementing Industry 4.0—The Case of Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Measuring the Effect of Consumer Brand Engagement on Brand-Related Outcomes in Gamified Mobile Apps: A Solicitation of Technology Acceptance Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Compulsive Buying and Beliefs about Digital Advertising †

1
Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Digital Transformation in Business: Challenges and New Opportunities, West Mishref, Kuwait, 17 November 2022.
Proceedings 2023, 85(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023085012
Published: 9 March 2023

Abstract

:
In view of concerns about consumers’ vulnerability to contemporary marketing tactics, this study aims to examine the extent to which compulsive buying affects beliefs about digital advertising. The results of a survey of 117 consumers suggest that compulsive buying positively affects the enjoyment of digital advertising. Subsequently, enjoyment positively affects the perceived appropriateness and behavioral impact of digital advertising. Overall, the findings indicate that a ‘shopaholic’ market segment appears to be more positively predisposed and therefore receptive to digital advertising. Thus, socially responsible businesses should take into account compulsive buyers’ vulnerability and protect them by adjusting their advertising actions accordingly.

1. Objectives

Most prior studies have perceived compulsive buying as a consequence of advertising [1]. However, considering that such tendencies or behaviors may be the function of numerous external influences and personal characteristics [2], the present research views compulsive buying as a factor shaping consumer beliefs about digital advertising [3], and aims to examine the significance and magnitude of its impact.

2. Methodology

The study’s non-random sample consisted of 117 participants, the majority of whom were female (73%), had attended tertiary education (68%), and were between 18–34 years of age (68%). Compulsive buying was measured with a 6-item scale [4], while beliefs about digital advertising were measured with a slightly modified and shorter version of the ‘public opinion towards advertising’ scale [5].

3. Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established one factor that measured ‘Compulsive Buying-CB’ (α = 0.79) and two factors that measured consumer beliefs about digital advertising (α = 0.81 for ‘Appropriateness and Behavioral Impact-ABI’ and Spearman–Brown = 0.76 for ‘Enjoyment’). The structural equation model (x2 = 20.18, p = 0.32; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.03; SRMR = 0.05) shows the significant and positive effects of CB on enjoyment and the effects of enjoyment on ABI (Figure 1).

4. Implications

A ‘shopaholic’ market segment appears more receptive to digital advertising, as its members are more likely to believe that digital ads are entertaining and engaging (i.e., enjoyable). Nevertheless, brands are advised to abstain from solely viewing this market segment as a profit-making opportunity. Because of the effectiveness of contemporary marketing tactics, socially responsible businesses should consider compulsive buyers’ vulnerability and adjust their advertising actions accordingly.

5. Originality Value

Contrary to an existing theory suggesting that compulsive buying may, in part, be the product of marketing and advertising tactics [6], the present study suggests that, when viewed as a consumer characteristic, compulsive buying shapes consumers’ beliefs about digital advertising. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents one of the few research efforts to establish a directional relationship with compulsive buying as the explanatory variable.

6. Contribution

In contrast to past research, which hypothesized that audiences with compulsive buying tendencies would have unfavorable attitudes towards advertising (Aad) [3], the present research indicates that compulsive buying is positively associated with the enjoyment of digital advertising. Furthermore, results agree with more up-to-date research about consumer materialism, which has been found to positively affect Aad [7].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L. and A.P.; methodology, C.L.; software, C.L.; validation, C.L., A.P. and N.K.; formal analysis, C.L.; investigation, A.P.; resources, A.P.; data curation, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, C.L., A.P. and N.K.; visualization, C.L. and A.P.; supervision, C.L.; project administration, C.L., A.P. and N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this survey study because it was designed and conducted in accordance with GDPR (Regulation EU 2016/679) and Greek National Regulations (L.4624/2019). Thus, the study’s dataset was anonymous, did not contain sensitive information, did not allow for direct or indirect identification of natural persons, and did not pose any potential threats to individuals’ rights and well-being.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available because they were provided by participants solely for the purpose of the present study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roberts, J.A. Compulsive buying among college students: An investigation of its antecedents, consequences, and implications for public policy. J. Consum. Aff. 1998, 32, 295–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Manolis, C.; Roberts, J.A.; Kashyap, V. A critique and comparison of two scales from fifteen years of studying compulsive buying. Psychol. Rep. 2008, 102, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kwak, H.; Zinkhan, G.M.; DeLorme, D.E. Effects of compulsive buying tendencies on attitudes toward advertising: The moderating role of exposure to TV commercials and TV shows. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2002, 24, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ridgway, N.M.; Kukar-Kinney, M.; Monroe, K.B. An expanded conceptualization and a new measure of compulsive buying. J. Consum. Res. 2008, 35, 622–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pollay, R.W.; Mittal, B. Here’s the beef: Factors, determinants, and segments in consumer criticism of advertising. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chan, K. Materialism among Chinese children in Hong Kong. Young Consum. 2003, 4, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Boateng, H.; Okoe, A.F. Determinants of consumers’ attitude towards social media advertising. J. Creat. Commun. 2015, 10, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Path diagram.
Figure 1. Path diagram.
Proceedings 85 00012 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Livas, C.; Pajollari, A.; Karali, N. Compulsive Buying and Beliefs about Digital Advertising. Proceedings 2023, 85, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023085012

AMA Style

Livas C, Pajollari A, Karali N. Compulsive Buying and Beliefs about Digital Advertising. Proceedings. 2023; 85(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023085012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Livas, Christos, Alba Pajollari, and Nansy Karali. 2023. "Compulsive Buying and Beliefs about Digital Advertising" Proceedings 85, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023085012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop