# How is Location Measured in Housing Valuation? A Systematic Review of Accessibility Specifications in Hedonic Price Models

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Literature Review

#### Operationalizing Accessibility Measures and Perception

## 3. Materials and Methods

#### 3.1. Searching

#### 3.2. Screening and Filtering

- We excluded all articles that did not use the hedonic price methodology.
- We excluded all articles that did not use residential sale price as its dependent variable. As a result, we excluded all articles that used non-residential sales price. The reason being that these other uses would value accessibility differently with a different set of methods.
- We similarly excluded all articles that looked at inter-metropolitan hedonic price researches. Different sets of accessibility variables are used when we are comparing which city to live rather than which parts of the city to live in.
- We also excluded meta-studies. The reason is that meta-studies can have different search criteria and search periods, which might result in mismatches between the articles we found and the articles used.
- We did not include studies that used land use transportation model (Luti). The reason being that the output of accessibility measures hold potential for a particular origin rather than the actual flows between a pair of origin and destination, as in a Luti model. However, we do note that the two are highly related.
- We also excluded studies pertaining to housing submarkets. These sets of literature had become a sub-domain within the housing literature and they would require a separate review to understand how accessibility influences the definition of the housing submarket.

#### 3.3. Reviewing

#### 3.3.1. Opportunities and Impedance

#### 3.3.2. Type

_{i}= min c

_{ij},

_{i}is the measure of accessibility and c

_{ij}is the distance or cost of travel between i and j.

_{i}=∑D

_{j}if d

_{ij}≤ r,

_{i}is the measure of accessibility in location i to all opportunities D

_{j}and r is the threshold radius for which the number of opportunities are summed.

_{i}=∑D

_{j}exp

^{−βc}

_{ij},

_{i}is the measure of accessibility in zone i to all opportunities D in zone j, c

_{ij}is the cost of travel between i and j, and beta is the cost sensitivity parameter. The impedance function can take a different functional form.

_{i}=ln ∑exp(V

_{ij}),

_{i}is the accessibility at the individual or homogenous population level i and V

_{ij}is the perceived utility. The perceived utility (V

_{ij}) is the sum of the utility derived from the transport mode in accessing the specific destination. The differences in utility between different scenarios can then be used to derive consumer surpluses and thus the monetary value. Empirically, this is done by multiplying the logsum accessibility by an income coefficient.

## 4. Results

## 5. Discussion

## Supplementary Materials

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Hahn, R.W. The impact of economics on environmental policy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag.
**2000**, 39, 375–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oates, W.E. From Research to Policy: The Case of Environmental Economics. Int. J. Urban Sci.
**2000**, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Palmquist, R.B.; Smith, V.K. The use of hedonic property value techniques for policy and litigation. Int. Yearb. Environ. Resour. Econ.
**2002**, 2003, 115–164. [Google Scholar] - Unwin, D.J. GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Prog. Hum. Geogr.
**1996**, 20, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Baranzini, A.; Schaerer, C.; Thalmann, P. Using measured instead of perceived noise in hedonic models. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ.
**2010**, 15, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lee, G.; Cho, D.; Kim, K. The modifiable areal unit problem in hedonic house-price models. Urban Geogr.
**2016**, 37, 223–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Palmquist, R.B. Chapter 16 Property Value Models. In Handbook of Environmental Economics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 2, pp. 763–819. ISBN 978-0-444-51145-4. [Google Scholar]
- Rosen, S. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. J. Polit. Econ.
**1974**, 82, 34–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Freeman, A.M. The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice; RFF Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1979; ISBN 978-0-8018-2163-9. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, W.G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. J. Am. Inst. Plann.
**1959**, 25, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ingram, D.R. The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form. Reg. Stud.
**1971**, 5, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Geurs, K.T.; van Wee, B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr.
**2004**, 12, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bhat, C.; Handy, S.; Kockelman, K.; Mahmassani, H.; Chen, Q.; Weston, L. Urban accessibility index: Literature review. Cent. Transp. Res. Univ. Tex. Austin Springf.
**2000**, 1–92. [Google Scholar] - Talen, E.; Anselin, L. Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds. Environ. Plan. A
**1998**, 30, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fotheringham, A.S.; Wong, D.W.S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Environ. Plan. Econ. Space
**1991**, 23, 1025–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bach, L. The Problem of Aggregation and Distance for Analyses of Accessibility and Access Opportunity in Location-Allocation Models. Environ. Plan. A
**1981**, 13, 955–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Apparicio, P.; Abdelmajid, M.; Riva, M.; Shearmur, R. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int. J. Health Geogr.
**2008**, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Michael, H.J.; Boyle, K.J.; Bouchard, R. Does the Measurement of Environmental Quality Affect Implicit Prices Estimated from Hedonic Models? Land Econ.
**2000**, 76, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Poor, P.J.; Boyle, K.J.; Taylor, L.O.; Bouchard, R. Objective versus subjective Measures of Water Clarity in Hendonic Property Value Models. Land Econ.
**2001**, 77, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alexander, E.R. Density measures: A review and analysis. J. Archit. Plan. Res.
**1993**, 181–202. [Google Scholar] - Rapoport, A. Toward a Redefinition of Density. Environ. Behav.
**1975**, 7, 133–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Openshaw, S.; Taylor, P.J. A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. Stat. Appl. Spat. Sci.
**1979**, 21, 127–144. [Google Scholar] - De Jong, T.M.; van der Voordt, D. Ways to Study and Research: Urban, Architectural and Technical Design; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Ståhle, A.; Bernow, R. Värdering av stadskvaliteter; Stockholms läns landsting: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Kummel, L.; Andersson, E. Värdering av Stadskvaliteter—Betalningsvilja för Småhus; Stockholms läns landsting: Stockholm, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lundhede, T.H.; Panduro, T.E.; Kummel, L.; Ståhle, A.; Heyman, A.; Thorsen, B.J. Værdisætning af Bykvaliteter—Fra Hovedstad til Provins: Hovedkonklusioner; Institut for Fødevare- og Ressourceøkonomi, Københavns Universitet: Frederiksberg C, Denmark, 2013; ISBN 978-87-92591-23-4. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, A. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling; Routledge: London, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Hägerstrand, T. What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci.
**1970**, 24, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Miller, H.J. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst.
**1991**, 5, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kwan, M.-P. Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework. Geogr. Anal.
**1998**, 30, 191–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Handy, S.L.; Niemeier, D.A. Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environ. Plan. A
**1997**, 29, 1175–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Armstrong, R.J.; Rodríguez, D.A. An Evaluation of the Accessibility Benefits of Commuter Rail in Eastern Massachusetts using Spatial Hedonic Price Functions. Transportation
**2006**, 33, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dubé, J.; Thériault, M.; Des Rosiers, F. Commuter rail accessibility and house values: The case of the Montreal South Shore, Canada, 1992–2009. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract.
**2013**, 54, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dubé, J.; Legros, D.; Thériault, M.; Des Rosiers, F. A spatial Difference-in-Differences estimator to evaluate the effect of change in public mass transit systems on house prices. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol.
**2014**, 64, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Von Thünen, J. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie; Gustav Fischer: Stuttgart, Germany, 1826. [Google Scholar]
- Alonso, W. Location and Land Use. Toward a General Theory of Land Rent; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Hillier, B. The architectures of seeing and going: Or, are cities shaped by bodies or minds? And is there a syntax ofspatial cognition? In Proceedings of the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, London, UK, 17–19 June 2003. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Scheme over search and filtering process. Starting from search of two databases for publications between 2000 and mid-2016 to screening and filtering before final review. From 120 articles in the initial search, the final number of articles included was 54.

**Figure 2.**The three aspects of accessibility measures that are investigated is type, opportunity, and impedance. This figure shows the aspects and their units.

**Figure 3.**The frequency of the use of the specific combination of opportunities and types of accessibility measures in the reviewed sample of papers. The numbers in the figure represent the amount of times the combination opportunity-type is used; the darker blue, the more frequent this combination is used; the sum shows the total amount of times that the opportunity or type is used, irrespective of the other aspect.

**Figure 4.**

**The frequency of the use of the specific combination of opportunities and impedance in the reviewed sample of papers**. The numbers in the figure represent the amount of times the combination opportunity-type is used; the darker blue, the more frequent this combination is used; the sum shows the total amount of times the opportunity or impedance is used, irrespective of the other aspect.

**Figure 5.**

**The frequency of the use of the specific combination of impedance and type in the reviewed sample of papers**. The numbers in the figure represent the amount of times the combination opportunity-type is used; the darker blue, the more frequent this combination is used; the sum shows the total amount of times the impedance or type is used, irrespective of the other aspect. The list “Dummies” show how many times type and impedance variables actually are dummy variables.

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Heyman, A.V.; Law, S.; Berghauser Pont, M.
How is Location Measured in Housing Valuation? A Systematic Review of Accessibility Specifications in Hedonic Price Models. *Urban Sci.* **2019**, *3*, 3.
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010003

**AMA Style**

Heyman AV, Law S, Berghauser Pont M.
How is Location Measured in Housing Valuation? A Systematic Review of Accessibility Specifications in Hedonic Price Models. *Urban Science*. 2019; 3(1):3.
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010003

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Heyman, Axel Viktor, Stephen Law, and Meta Berghauser Pont.
2019. "How is Location Measured in Housing Valuation? A Systematic Review of Accessibility Specifications in Hedonic Price Models" *Urban Science* 3, no. 1: 3.
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010003