Next Article in Journal
Influence of Total Suspended Solids on the Growth of the Sea Lettuce Ulva lactuca Integrated with the Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in a Biofloc System
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Sound Attenuation by Individual and Multiple Fishes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Population Genetics of Chilean Jack Mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920, (Pisces, Carangidae), in Waters of the South Pacific Ocean

by
Sandra Ferrada Fuentes
1,
Ricardo Galleguillos
1,
Victoria Herrera-Yáñez
1 and
Cristian B. Canales-Aguirre
2,3,*
1
Laboratorio de Genética y Acuicultura, Departamento de Oceanografía, Universidad de Concepción, Concepcion 4030000, Chile
2
Centro i~mar, Universidad de Los Lagos, Puerto Montt 5480000, Chile
3
Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepcion 4030000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2023, 8(3), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8030162
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Estimating genetic diversity and population structure with polymorphic markers might provide information for the better management of fish that have economic importance. We used the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi, a pelagic species distributed in the south Pacific Ocean, to test the population genetic structure across its distribution. A total of 522 samples were collected from 11 locations in 2008, to be analyzed using six loci microsatellites. We conducted traditional genetic analyses to describe the genetic diversity of T. murphyi and whether it shows spatial genetic structure. The results showed a high genetic diversity across locations (Ho = 0.551 to 0.980; He = 0.676 to 0.959). Estimates for the population structure showed a low and non-significant pairwise FST in all comparisons. We supported the non-genetic differentiation previously reported with the used microsatellite panel. Further comparative temporal studies should be conducted to identify the stability of this pattern. Overall, this study reinforces the hypothesis that, in the Pacific Ocean, Chilean jack mackerel correspond to a large single population.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

New data providing estimations of genetic diversity and population structure in marine fishes may contribute to appropriate fishery management (e.g., [1,2,3]). Understanding stock structure is important for identifying differentiated reproductive groups (i.e., evolutionarily significant units or genetic stocks) and is the first task for their management [4]. For migratory fishes, which several countries exploit as a resource, it is important to estimate their number because overharvesting can decrease the genetic diversity and, hence, the evolutionary potential of these species [5]. Additionally, habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change have led to a global decline in marine fish biodiversity [6].
The Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi, is a highly migratory pelagic species that inhabits the South Pacific Ocean [7]. Specifically, T. murphyi is distributed off the coast of south Ecuador (1°38′ N) and the south of Chile (55° S); it crosses the Pacific Ocean along the West Drift current, reaching as far as New Zealand and Tasmania [7,8,9]. In the open ocean, its distribution exceeds 200 nm of the Peruvian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), while, concerning Chile, it exceeds 1000 nm [10]. It is economically important for the countries where it is distributed and also for the European Union and Asia. In the SPPRFMO (South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization) area, for instance, the Chilean jack mackerel catches over the 2013–2022 period progressively increased, with the maximum reached in 2022, in which 928,852 tons were fished [11]. The Chilean jack mackerel is an indeterminate batch spawner [12], where females have asynchronous ovarian development [13] and are able to spawn along their entire distribution [14]. Two main spawning areas have been proposed as the population structure of T. murphyi [7,9,15]; however, this is not fully supported by other methodologies.
Several studies have been conducted to resolve the population structure, which include studies of parasites [16,17], life-history traits [7,18], morphometry and meristic traits [7], otolith microchemistry [19,20], oceanographic modelling [19], and genetics [2,21]. Some of these support the inference of more than one population, while others support the inference of just one population [2,7,16,21]. Despite the complex scenario of population structure in the South Pacific Ocean, Gerlotto et al. [10] refuted independent, discrete self-recruiting populations.
Population genetics studies published on T. murphyi have included several molecular markers. Chronologically, in a technical report, Galleguillos and Torres [22] identified polymorphic enzyme loci in samples from Chile (Chiloé, Talcahuano, Juan Fernández, Iquique), Perú, and one oceanic area (39°24′ S; 76°45′ W), while not detecting significant differences between them. Later, using 23 enzymatic loci for samples from Chile, no differences were identified [23]. Using PCR-RFLP in the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) amplicon and restricted to the MspI enzyme, and analyzing samples from Chile (Isla Mocha, Iquique, Juan Fernández), New Zealand, and Australia, showed no significant genetic differences among the samples, while patterns of genetic homogeneity were observed in the study area for these genetic markers [24]. Cárdenas et al. [21], analyzing mitochondrial DNA sequences (control region 772 bp) and nuclear DNA (four heterologous microsatellite loci) for samples from Chile (Iquique, San Antonio, and Concepción), one off the Chilean coast and another around New Zealand, indicated low genetic variability for both types of molecular marker, with no significant genetic differentiation among localities. Later, Canales-Aguirre et al. [25] isolated and characterized eight species-specific polymorphic loci for T. murphyi. Galleguillos et al. [2], using three distant locations in the South Pacific Ocean, also did not find any genetic differences. Despite there having been great efforts made to use genetic markers to identify changes in allelic frequencies, no studies have used a combination of heterologous and species-specific microsatellite loci to estimate the genetic diversity and population structure in Chilean jack mackerel. Additionally, the geographic coverage of studies has not always incorporated samples from the peripheral geographic distribution, as well as the use of species-specific markers. For instance, Cárdenas et al. [21] did not include samples from Perú, and for microsatellites, used only heterologous loci.
In this study, we used microsatellite loci to test the hypothesis of no genetic differentiation in the South Pacific Ocean in T. murphyi. More specifically, we screened six microsatellite loci across collections from 11 locations distributed across the whole geographical range. We used traditional population genetic parameters, in order to compare with results from previous research. Finally, we discuss our results in a biological context and regarding the expansion of this species to New Zealand.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

Samples from adult specimens (n = 522) of Chilean jack mackerel were collected across the Southern Pacific Ocean (Figure 1) during 2008 as part of the project FIPA 2007-27 of the Chilean government. Samples were obtained from three locations from Perú (i.e., Paita (n = 34), Punta Lobos de Afuera (n = 34), and Paracas (n = 54)), one location from New Zealand (i.e., west coast South Island; (n = 50)), and seven locations from Chile (i.e., Iquique (n = 46), Caldera (n = 51), Coquimbo (n = 56), coastal Talcahuano (n = 43), oceanic Talcahuano (n = 51), coastal Calbuco (n = 54), oceanic Calbuco (n = 49)). A small piece of muscle tissue was excised from each specimen and stored at 4 °C in absolute ethanol.

2.2. DNA Purification and PCR Procedures

Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue samples using proteinase K digestion, followed by a standard phenol–chloroform method and precipitation in ethanol, as described in Grijalva-Chon et al. [26]. DNA was subsequently resuspended in 100 µL of ultrapure water. The quality and quantity of each sample was measured with an Eppendorf biophotometer, and the template DNA was diluted to 20 ng for the PCR amplifications.
We used seven microsatellite loci to study the genetic structure of T. murphyi: four heterologous loci developed for T. trachurus by Kasapidis and Magoulas [27] (i.e., Tt29, Tt48, Tt62 and Tt133) and three species-specific loci developed by Canales-Aguirre et al. [25] (i.e., TmurA101, TmurA104, and TmurA115). Heterologous loci were amplified in 10 µL reactions containing 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.4 µM of each primer, and 0.1 U/µL Taq DNA polymerase. Thermal cycler parameters were 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55–57 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 75 °C for 5 min. Species-specific loci were amplified in 10 µL reactions containing 1X PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µM of each primer, 200 mM dNTPs, and 0.03 U/ µL Taq DNA polymerase. The thermal cycler parameters were 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For all reactions, we used Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), forward primers were fluorescently labeled with a dye (6-FAM, VIC, NED, or PET) and 20 ng of genomic DNA template. PCR amplifications were performed in a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research). The fragments were visualized on an ABI PRISM 3730xl capillary DNA sequencer using GS500 as the internal size standard. The assignment of allele size was carried out using a Peak Scanner v1.0 (Applied Biosystems).

2.3. Microsatellite Data Analysis

We conducted an exploratory analysis to detect genotyping errors and check for the presence of null alleles. Short-allele dominance and the scoring of stutter peaks were tested in Micro-Checker v2.2.3 [28]. The frequency of the null alleles was estimated using the Brookfield algorithm [29] using Genepop on the Web (https://genepop.curtin.edu.au/ (accessed on 13 September 2022).) and using the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) as an estimator of excess homozygosity. We excluded microsatellite loci that showed an average higher than 15% missing data and excess of homozygosity (FIS), and at least 30% of the locations showed null allele frequencies larger than 10%. All loci that met these criteria were excluded from the data set and further analyses.
As a summary statistic of genetic diversity, we estimated the effective sample size (N), number of alleles (NA), the observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficient (FIS), and departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HW) using GENALEX v6 [30]. To detect significant differences from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, we followed the procedure of Hedrick [31] implemented in GENALEX, which included a test for conformity with HWE expectations by calculating X2.
To identify the population structure across the locations surveyed, we used a pairwise FST, an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and principal component analysis (PCA). We estimated a pairwise FST comparison between sampling locations in ARLEQUIN v3.5 [32], where the p-value was obtained after 10,100 permutations, and sequential Bonferroni correction [33] for multiple comparisons was applied when necessary. We estimated the proportions of genetic variation among sampling locations using an AMOVA implemented in ARLEQUIN. Specifically, we evaluated the following hypotheses: (a) panmixia and (b) the presence of genetic differentiation for the most distant localities (Perú vs. Chile vs. New Zealand). We subjected the multilocus microsatellite data to principal component analyses in ADEGENET [34,35], thus comparing the relationships among individuals from sampling locations.

3. Results

The exploratory analysis showed no genotyping errors such as short allele dominance or stutter bands; nonetheless, locus Tt48 did not meet the criterion tested (Table S1). Overall, locus Tt48 showed an average of 20% missing data (5 of 11 locations higher than 0.15), with an average homozygote excess of 0.18. Checking by null allele presence, locus Tt48 showed that 4 of 11 locations (36%) had a null allele frequency higher than 0.10. Hence, data from this locus were excluded from the analyses (Table S1).
Summary statistics of genetic diversity showed distinct values across locations (Table S2). The number of alleles ranged from 9 (PAI) to 35 (IQQ), the observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.551 (CBCo) to 0.980 (CAL), the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.676 (CBCo) to 0.959 (NWZ), and the inbreeding coefficient ranged from 0.676 (CBCo) to 0.959 (NWZ) (Table S2).
The pairwise FST values for all of the loci surveyed ranged from 0 to 0.005, and none of the combinations showed significant differences (p > 0.05; Table 1). The analysis of molecular variance showed an FST of 0.00011 (p = 0.682) to test the hypothesis of panmixia, with an FST of 0.00016 (p = 0.665) and FCT of 0.00011 (p = 0.419) for far localities (Perú vs. Chile vs. New Zealand) (Table 2). Principal component analyses (PCA) showed a low amount of variation (1.3 and 1.2%), explained by the first and second principal components (Figure 2). Individuals formed a big cloud showing that the population was not differentiated. Two individuals were identified as outliers, one from Paracas and the other from New Zealand. Overall, pairwise FST, AMOVA, and PCA showed concurring results.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to evaluate the genetic diversity across the geographic distribution of Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) using nuclear heterologous and species-specific microsatellite loci as a source of information. We screened six microsatellites in collections from 11 locations through its Pacific Ocean distribution, to estimate how the genetic diversity was distributed spatially. We did not find any genetic differentiation among locations using these loci. Overall, our results reinforce the idea that T. murphyi in its geographic distribution corresponds to a large single population.

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure

The six microsatellite loci analyzed for T. murphyi across its geographic distribution were highly variable. We found that the average number of alleles showed values of 21.1 (heterologous) and 27.5 alleles per locus (specific), while the observed heterozygosity was 0.787 for heterologous and 0.882 for specific loci. For marine fishes, the genetic variability in microsatellites is, on average, 20.4 alleles per locus and 0.790 heterozygosity [36]. Our values of genetic diversity were qualitatively higher than those for marine species estimated by DeWoody and Avise [36].
The population differentiation analyses showed that T. murphyi does not have a genetic structure through its geographical distribution. We estimated a low and non-significant FST index (pairwise and AMOVA), agreeing with Ward et al. [37], which highlights that marine fish show low genetic differentiation (with values of FST < 0.01) compared to freshwater and anadromous fishes. The non-genetic differentiation obtained here over the geographical area seems to be common for other taxa. For instance, Dissostichus eleginoides showed no differences in its geographic distribution from northern Perú to the Falkland Islands [38]. In the Chilean exclusive economic zone, the marine fishes Genypterus blacodes, Sprattus fuegensis, and Engraulis ringens [1,3,39]; the crustaceans Jasus frontalis and Metacarcinus edwardsii [40,41]; the Echinodermata Centrostephanus sylviae [42]; and the mollusks Concholepas concholepas [43] showed the same genetic population pattern. Specifically for T. murphyi, several studies have been conducted using a variety of molecular markers. Using allozymes [22,23], PCR-RFLP for ITS marker [24], only heterologous microsatellites and mtDNA [21], and specific microsatellites [2], no significant genetic differentiation has been detected. Although some of these studies were limited by the number of locations, coverage surveyed, sample size, and the polymorphisms of the marker used, they all converged in terms of results.
Geographically, distant T. murphyi localities were surveyed in this study (Punta Lobos Afuera (~6° S–81° W), Oceanic Calbuco (44°08′ S–83°51′ W) and New Zealand (47° S–176° W)), in which no genetic differences were found. Ward [44] in his work Genetics in Fisheries Management, states “If no genetic differences are detected, then either there is a single stock or there are two stocks which could not be resolved by the test”. Otherwise, the null hypothesis of “panmixia” can be rejected if differences are found, but if it cannot be rejected, this does not mean that it is true. Taking into account that gene flow rates of 1% and 5% can homogenize the gene pool of a population, no differences would be found even if they existed in nature, i.e., the species has a population structure, but it is not detected.
If we take into account that the null hypothesis is “panmixia” (a single, randomly mating population), what happens to individuals that are located in distant locations (e.g., New Zealand versus Punta Lobos Afuera or Oceanic Calbuco)? It is plausible, that these individuals do not “congregate” in a common area to breed and therefore do not share the same probability of random mating. For the localities of the southeastern Pacific Ocean (Perú and Chile), the homogeneity found can be explained by biological aspects of the species; for example, (a) the main concentrations of its abundance, in Perú, are located mainly in the northern and central zone, while in Chile, from Arica to Coquimbo (18–30° S) and from Valparaíso to south of Talcahuano (33–37° S); the distribution of these main zones of abundance can change seasonally; (b) it can spawn throughout its distribution [45], in Perú mainly to the south (16–18°30′ S) and in Chile from the northern limit to Corral (40° S); as well as the abundance, reproductive aggregations can vary seasonally; (c) it presents extremely large population sizes (billions of individuals); (d) eggs and larvae are pelagic; (e) juveniles and adults present seasonal movements (trophic-reproductive); (f) they can live in different biotopes, feeding in coastal waters and reproducing in offshore waters [7,19]; (g) the occurrence of the El Niño phenomenon, a phenomenon that produces spatial shifts in abundance and therefore increases the possibility of mixing; (h) the expanded distribution of Chilean jack mackerel due to its increased abundance also causes the limits of the populations to become confused and is therefore another mechanism that makes mixing possible.
For New Zealand, T. murphyi was recorded in the subtropical convergence zone above Chatam Rise less than four decades ago [46,47]. This demonstrated that T. murphyi has a transoceanic distribution. One explanation for this distribution is that the species expanded its range westward, colonizing new areas due to intra-population pressures [7,48,49]. According to the latter author, Chilean jack mackerel is an invasive species in New Zealand waters. Cárdenas et al. [21] estimated a recent expansion of the distribution range of T. murphyi. The low variability found in individuals from New Zealand, the absence of private alleles, and negative values in the demographic analyses (Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs) account for this population expansion [21]. Taking into account that, in order to differentiate one population from another, it is necessary to ensure reproductive isolation (10–100 generations; [50]), so far, it is not clear whether T. murphyi is continuing to migrate through the subtropical convergence between Chile and New Zealand; if so, a difference at the genetic level would not be expected. Considering that the group of fish that arrived in New Zealand has no interchange of individuals with those present in Chile, little time has passed for them to accumulate genetic differences that would allow them to be identified as separate groups; furthermore, there must have been millions and not just a few migrant individuals, which means that the genetic drift would not have significant effects. The age of first maturity is close to three years and, considering that T. murphyi was reported in New Zealand only four decades ago, there must have been fewer than 15 generations, which are too few to accumulate differences in genetic terms.
In summary, finding no significant differences in the distribution of T. murphyi with the three heterologous and three species-specific microsatellite loci does not mean that there are not different stocks of Chilean jack mackerel in the wild. We recognize that we are only using a small panel of loci and that the genome size of genus Trachurus is large (801 Mb for the congeneric Atlantic jack mackerel T. trachurus [51]). Nonetheless, our results are consistent with those of previous research. Studies using larger panels of specific loci should be carried out to ensure a much more robust approach. Using species-specific microsatellites might open the possibility of differences being found, given that these markers present different repeat and polymorphism motifs, and it is possible that some of these loci may shed new light on the population structure of Chilean jack mackerel. Future studies should focus on temporal comparisons in the whole distribution, mainly comparing samples from spawning and no-spawning seasons. Otherwise, an approach that reduced the complexity of the genome (e.g., ddRAD, RADseq, DARTseq) could provide a large amount of data to identify differences previously not resolved, increasing the power to resolve a lack of population structure in fishes with gene flow [52,53]. Additionally, using genomic approaches, it is possible to access adaptive information that cannot be detected using neutral microsatellites, and the results can uncover hidden, fine-scale population structure and adaptation, despite considerable gene flow (e.g., [54]).
Overall, this study reinforces the hypothesis that, in the Pacific Ocean, Chilean jack mackerel correspond to a large single population.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fishes8030162/s1, Table S1: Criteria used to exclude loci in heterologous microsatellites by locus and locality; Table S2: Summary statistics of genetic diversity for Trachurus murphyi in South Pacific Ocean.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G., S.F.F. and C.B.C.-A.; methodology, S.F.F. and C.B.C.-A.; formal analysis, C.B.C.-A. and S.F.F.; data curation, S.F.F. and C.B.C.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.B.C.-A.; writing—review and editing, S.F.F., R.G., V.H.-Y. and C.B.C.-A.; visualization, V.H.-Y.; project administration, R.G. and S.F.F.; funding acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fondo de Investigación Pesquera y Acuicultura, grant number FIPA 2007-27, from Chilean Government.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No test animals were used during this research. The tissue obtained from our subsequent analyses was collected by observers aboard commercial fishing vessels in the course of the Chilean jack mackerel fishery.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in https://github.com/Canales-AguirreCB/Ferrada-Fuentes_etal_2023_Fishes (accessed on 20 December 2022).

Acknowledgments

We would thank the scientific observers from Instituto de Fomento Pesquero from Chile (IFOP), Instituto del Mar del Perú from Perú (IMARPE), and the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) for collecting the Chilean jack mackerels. We also thank Andrea Barrera and Claudio Díaz for help in the laboratory procedures. CCA thanks INVASAL (ANID–Millennium Science Initiative–NCN16_034). We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ferrada-Fuentes, S.; Galleguillos, R.; Hernández, C.E. Genetic structure in a small pelagic fish coincides with a marine protected area: Seascape genetics in Patagonian fjords. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Galleguillos, R.; Canales-Aguirre, C.; Ferrada, S. Genetic variability in jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi Nichols: New SSRs loci and application. Gayana 2012, 76, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ferrada, S.; Hernandez, C.E.; Galleguillos, R. Population structure and demographic history of Genypterus blacodes using microsatellite loci. Fish. Res. 2010, 106, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Valenzuela-Quiñonez, F. How fisheries management can benefit from genomics? Brief. Funct. Genomics 2016, 15, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hauser, L.; Adcock, G.J.; Smith, P.J.; Bernal Ramírez, J.H.; Carvalho, G.R. Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand Snapper (Pagrus auratus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11742–11747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Martinez, A.S.; Willoughby, J.R.; Christie, M.R. Genetic diversity in fishes is influenced by habitat type and life-history variation. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 12022–12031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Serra, R. Important life history aspects of the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi. Investig. Pesq. Chile 1991, 36, 67–83. [Google Scholar]
  8. Grechina, A. Historia de investigaciones y aspectos básicos de la ecología del jurel Trachurus symmetricus murphyi (Nichols) en alta mar del Pacífico sur. In Biología y pesca comercial del jurel en el Océano Pacífico Sur; Instituto de Investigación Pesquera: Talcahuano, Chile, 1998; pp. 11–34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Grechina, A.; Núñez, S.; Arcos, D. El desove del recurso jurel Trachurus symmetricus murphyi (Nichols) en el océano Pacífico sur. In Biología y pesca comercial del jurel en el Océano Pacífico Sur; Instituto de Investigación Pesquera: Talcahuano, Chile, 1998; pp. 117–140. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerlotto, F.; Gutiérrez, M.; Bertrand, A. Insight on population structure of the Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi). Aquat. Living Resour. 2012, 25, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. SPRFMO. 10th Scientific Committee Meeting Report; SPRFMO Publishers: Wellington, New Zealand, 2022; p. 86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dioses, T.; Alarcón, V.; Nakama, M.; Echeverría, A. Desarrollo ovocitario, fecundidad parcial y distribución vertical de los cardúmenes en desove del jurel Trachurus murphyi (N); IMARPE: La Punta, Peru, 1989; pp. 287–294. [Google Scholar]
  13. Leal, E.; Díaz, E.; Saavedra-Nievas, J.; Claramunt, G. Ciclo reproductivo, longitud y edad de madurez del jurel Trachurus murphyi, en la costa de Chile. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2013, 48, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. González-Kother, P.; González, M.T.; Oliva, M.E. A first assessment of atresia in the Chilean jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi (Teleostei, Carangidae) from the south-eastern Pacific Ocean. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2020, 55, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grechina, A.; Nuñez, S.; Arcos, D. Desove del recurso jurel (Trachurus murphyi) en el océano Pacífico sur. Doc. Técn. Investig. PesqIIP Talcahuano 1994, 3, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oliva, M. Metazoan parasites of the jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi (Teleostei, Carangidae) in a latitudinal gradient from South America (Chile and Peru). Parasite 1999, 6, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. George-Nascimento, M. Geographical variations in the jack mackerel Trachurus symmetricus murphyi populations in the southeastern Pacific Ocean as evidenced from the associated parasite communities. J. Parasitol. 2000, 86, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cubillos, L.A.; Paramo, J.; Ruiz, P.; Núñez, S.; Sepúlveda, A. The spatial structure of the oceanic spawning of jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) off central Chile (1998–2001). Fish. Res. 2008, 90, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vásquez, S.; Correa-Ramírez, M.; Parada, C.; Sepúlveda, A. The influence of oceanographic processes on jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) larval distribution and population structure in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2013, 70, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ashford, J.; Serra, R.; Saavedra, J.C.; Letelier, J. Otolith chemistry indicates large-scale connectivity in Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi), a highly mobile species in the southern Pacific Ocean. Fish. Res. 2011, 107, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cárdenas, L.; Silva, A.X.; Magoulas, A.; Cabezas, J.; Poulin, E.; Ojeda, F.P. Genetic population structure in the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi (Nichols) across the south-eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish. Res. 2009, 100, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Galleguillos, R.; Torres, A. Identificación de Unidades Poblacionales Pelágicas. Tercera Etapa. Informe Final; Subpesca: Valparaíso, Chile, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  23. González, F.; Alay, F.; Cabello, J.; Chávez, R. Definición de unidad de stock desde el punto de vista genético en el recurso jurel (Trachurus symmetricus murphyi) Nichols, 1920 (Carangidae, Perciforme). Gayana Zool. 1996, 4, 183–196. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sepúlveda, A.; Cubillos, L.; Grechina, A.; Peña, H.; Vilugron, L.; Hernández, A.; Miranda, L.; Sobarzo, P.; Serra, R.; Braun, M.; et al. Migración de Jurel Desde y Hacia la ZEE de Chile Central. Informes Técnicos. FIP/IT No96-15; FIP: Valparaíso, Chile, 1996; p. 273. [Google Scholar]
  25. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ferrada, S.; Galleguillos, R. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920). Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11, 1235–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grijalva-Chon, J.; Numachi, J.; Sosa-Nishizaki, K.; de la Rosa-Vélez, J. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of north Pacific swordfish Xiphias gladius population structure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1994, 115, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kasapidis, P.; Magoulas, A. Development and application of microsatellite markers to address the population structure of the horse mackerel Trachurus trachurus. Fish. Res. 2008, 89, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. van Oosterhout, C.; Hutchinson, W.F.; Wills, D.P.M.; Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brookfield, J.F.Y. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol. Ecol. 1996, 5, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hedrick, P.W. Genetics of Populations, 2nd ed.; Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  32. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E.L. Arlequin Suite Ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rice, W.R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jombart, T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jombart, T.; Devillard, S.; Dufour, A.-B.; Pontier, D. Revealing cryptic spatial patterns in genetic variability by a new multivariate method. Heredity 2008, 101, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. DeWoody, J.A.; Avise, J.C. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J. Fish. Biol. 2000, 56, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ward, R.D.; Woodwark, M.; Skibinski, D.O.F. A comparison of genetic diversity levels in marine, freshwater, and anadromous Fishes. J. Fish. Biol. 1994, 44, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ferrada-Fuentes, S.; Galleguillos, R.; Oyarzun, F.X.; Hernández, C.E. Population genetic structure of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) in the southeast Pacific and southwest Atlantic Ocean. PeerJ 2018, 2018, e4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ferrada, S.; Hernández, K.; Montoya, R.; Galleguillos, R. Estudio poblacional del recurso anchoveta (Engraulis ringens Jenyns 1842) (Clupeiformes, Engraulidae), mediante análisis de ADN. Gayana 2002, 66, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Porobic, J.; Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ernst, B.; Galleguillos, R.; Hernandez, C.E. Biogeography and historical demography of the Juan Fernández rock lobster, Jasus frontalis (Milne Edwards, 1837). J. Hered. 2013, 104, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Veliz, D.; Rojas-Hernández, N.; Vega-Retter, C.; Zaviezo, C.; Garrido, I.; Pardo, L.M. Spatial and temporal stability in the genetic structure of a marine crab despite a biogeographic break. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Veliz, D.; Rojas-Hernández, N.; Fibla, P.; Dewitte, B.; Cornejo-Guzmán, S.; Parada, C. High levels of connectivity over large distances in the Diadematid sea urchin Centrostephanus sylviae. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cárdenas, L.; Castilla, J.C.; Viard, F. A Phylogeographical analysis across three biogeographical provinces of the South-eastern Pacific: The case of the marine gastropod Concholepas concholepas. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 969–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ward, R.D. Genetics in fisheries management. Hydrobiologia 2000, 420, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gorbunova, N.; Evseenko, S.; Garetovsky, S. Distribution of ichthyoplankton in the frontal zones of the Peruvian waters. J. Ichthyol. 1985, 25, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
  46. Evseenko, S. On the reproduction of the Peruvian jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi (Nichols), in the southern part of the Pacific Ocean. Vopr. Ikhtiologii 1987, 27, 264–273. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bailey, K. Description and surface distribution of juvenile Peruvian jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi, Nichols from the subtropical convergence zone of central south Pacific. Fish. Bull. 1989, 87, 273–278. [Google Scholar]
  48. Elizarov, A. Peruvian jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi, in the open waters of the south Pacific. J. Ichthyol 1993, 33, 86–103. [Google Scholar]
  49. Taylor, P. Stock structure and population biology of the Peruvian jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi. N. Z. Fish. Assess. Rep. 2002, 21. [Google Scholar]
  50. Selkoe, K.A.; Toonen, R.J. Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Genner, M.; Collins, R.; Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Programme; Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines Collective; Tree of Life Core Informatics Collective; Darwin Tree of Life Consortium. The genome sequence of the Atlantic horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus (Linnaeus 1758). Wellcome Open Res. 2022, 7, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hollenbeck, C.M.; Portnoy, D.S.; Gold, J.R. Evolution of population structure in an estuarine-dependent marine Fish. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 3141–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Luikart, G.; England, P.R.; Tallmon, D.; Jordan, S.; Taberlet, P. The power and promise of population genomics: From genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Larson, W.A.; McKinney, G.J.; Claure, C.E.; Rocha, J.D.; Ceballos, S.G.; Cádiz, M.I.; Yáñez, J.M.; Gomez-Uchida, D. Neutral and adaptive loci reveal fine-scale population structure in Eleginops maclovinus from north Patagonia. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e9343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling locations for T. murphyi across its whole South Pacific Ocean distribution. PAI: Paita, PLA: Punta Lobos Afuera; PAR: Paracas; IQQ: Iquique; CAL: Caldera; CQB: Coquimbo; THNc: costal Talcahuano; THNo: oceanic Talcahuano; CBCc: costal Calbuco; CBCo: oceanic Calbuco; NWZ: New Zealand.
Figure 1. Sampling locations for T. murphyi across its whole South Pacific Ocean distribution. PAI: Paita, PLA: Punta Lobos Afuera; PAR: Paracas; IQQ: Iquique; CAL: Caldera; CQB: Coquimbo; THNc: costal Talcahuano; THNo: oceanic Talcahuano; CBCc: costal Calbuco; CBCo: oceanic Calbuco; NWZ: New Zealand.
Fishes 08 00162 g001
Figure 2. Individual-based principal component analysis for Trachurus murphyi localities across the South Pacific Ocean using six microsatellite loci. Barplots above represent the eigenvalues for the PCA, while the red and orange bars show the eigenvalues for axis 1 and axis 2. PAI: Paita, PLA: Punta Lobos Afuera; PAR: Paracas; IQQ: Iquique; CAL: Caldera; CQB: Coquimbo; THNc: costal Talcahuano; THNo: oceanic Talcahuano; CBCc: costal Calbuco; CBCo: oceanic Calbuco; NWZ: New Zealand.
Figure 2. Individual-based principal component analysis for Trachurus murphyi localities across the South Pacific Ocean using six microsatellite loci. Barplots above represent the eigenvalues for the PCA, while the red and orange bars show the eigenvalues for axis 1 and axis 2. PAI: Paita, PLA: Punta Lobos Afuera; PAR: Paracas; IQQ: Iquique; CAL: Caldera; CQB: Coquimbo; THNc: costal Talcahuano; THNo: oceanic Talcahuano; CBCc: costal Calbuco; CBCo: oceanic Calbuco; NWZ: New Zealand.
Fishes 08 00162 g002
Table 1. Pairwise FST values calculated for microsatellite dataset of T. murphyi across its South Pacific Ocean distribution.
Table 1. Pairwise FST values calculated for microsatellite dataset of T. murphyi across its South Pacific Ocean distribution.
PAIPLAPARIQQCALCQBTHNcTHNoCBCcCBCoNWZ
PAI*
PLA0.002*
PAR0.000−0.006*
IQQ−0.003−0.0040.000*
CAL0.002−0.005−0.002−0.002*
CQB0.000−0.0050.0010.0010.001*
THNc0.0030.0010.0000.0000.000−0.004*
THNo0.001−0.003−0.0010.0020.000−0.0010.001*
CBCc0.000−0.0050.0010.0010.0000.000−0.0010.002*
CBCo0.0010.0000.0010.0050.0010.0030.0010.0000.002*
NWZ0.002−0.0030.0020.005−0.0010.0020.0010.0000.002−0.001*
* Indicates empty cells. PAI: Paita, PLA: Punta Lobos Afuera; PAR: Paracas; IQQ: Iquique; CAL: Caldera; CQB: Coquimbo; THNc: costal Talcahuano; THNo: oceanic Talcahuano; CBCc: costal Calbuco; CBCo: oceanic Calbuco; NWZ: New Zealand.
Table 2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for T. murphyi samples to evaluate the hypothesis of panmixia and the most distant localities (Perú vs. Chile vs. New Zealand). All p-values are based on 10,000 permutations.
Table 2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for T. murphyi samples to evaluate the hypothesis of panmixia and the most distant localities (Perú vs. Chile vs. New Zealand). All p-values are based on 10,000 permutations.
GroupsFSTp-ValueFSCp-ValueFCTp-Value
Perú vs. Chile vs. New Zealand0.000160.6650.000050.5970.000110.419
Panmixia0.000110.682
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferrada Fuentes, S.; Galleguillos, R.; Herrera-Yáñez, V.; Canales-Aguirre, C.B. Population Genetics of Chilean Jack Mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920, (Pisces, Carangidae), in Waters of the South Pacific Ocean. Fishes 2023, 8, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8030162

AMA Style

Ferrada Fuentes S, Galleguillos R, Herrera-Yáñez V, Canales-Aguirre CB. Population Genetics of Chilean Jack Mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920, (Pisces, Carangidae), in Waters of the South Pacific Ocean. Fishes. 2023; 8(3):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8030162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferrada Fuentes, Sandra, Ricardo Galleguillos, Victoria Herrera-Yáñez, and Cristian B. Canales-Aguirre. 2023. "Population Genetics of Chilean Jack Mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920, (Pisces, Carangidae), in Waters of the South Pacific Ocean" Fishes 8, no. 3: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8030162

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop