Next Article in Journal
Fabrication and Soft Magnetic Properties of Fe–Si–Cr Composites with Double-Insulating Layers Suitable for High-Frequency Power Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Nonlinear Electromagnetic Properties of Thinfilm Nanocomposites (CoFeZr)x(MgF2)100−x
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Dynamic Viscoelasticity of a Mineral Oil-Based Magnetic Fluid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Co-Doping on the Magnetic Ground State of the Heavy-Fermion System CeCu2Ge2 Studied by Neutron Diffraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetism and Exchange Bias Properties in Ba2ScRuO6

1
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Bhopal 462066, Madhya Pradesh, India
2
School of Physics and Materials Science, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Physics, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Magnetochemistry 2023, 9(6), 144; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060144
Submission received: 24 April 2023 / Revised: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 22 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023

Abstract

:
This paper presents structural, detailed magnetic, and exchange bias studies in polycrystalline Ba 2 ScRuO 6 synthesized at ambient pressure. In contrast to its strontium analogue, this material crystallizes in a 6L hexagonal structure with space group P 3 ¯ m1. The Rietveld refinement using the room-temperature powder XRD pattern suggests a Ru-Sc disorder in the structure. The temperature variation of the DC electrical resistivity highlights a semiconducting behavior with the electron conduction corresponding to Mott’s 3D variable range hopping (VRH) model. The detailed magnetization measurements show that Ba 2 ScRuO 6 develops antiferromagnetic ordering at T N ≈ 9 K. Interestingly, below 9 K (T N ), the field-cooled magnetic field variation (FC) of the magnetization curves highlights an exchange bias effect in the sample. The exchange bias field reaches a maximum value of 1.24 kOe at 2 K. The exchange bias effect below the magnetic ordering temperature can be attributed to the inhomogeneous magnetic correlations due to the disorder in the structure. Remarkably, the appearance of a large exchange bias field in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 indicates that inhomogeneous hexagonal double perovskites are a promising class to explore new materials having potential applications in spintronics.

1. Introduction

Double perovskites (DPs), discovered in 1889, with a general formula A 2 BB O 6 (A = Alkaline metals, B and B = transition metals) have attracted intense research attention as these materials are known to host intriguing magnetic and magneto-transport properties having potential applications in spintronics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In an ideal DP structure, the two transition metal sites (B and B ) form interpenetrating face-centered cubic (FCC) sublattices. As a structural feature of DPs, the intra- and inter-sublattice superexchange couplings and their interactions determine the complex magnetic properties of the system [7,8,9,10]. However, double perovskites with a magnetic ion at the B site (B = nonmagnetic) attracted recent interest due to their potential to design an enhanced magnetic frustration and exchange bias effect [11,12].
Among double perovskites, the ruthenium-based DP with composition A 2 BRuO 6 (B = smaller metals) is an important family of DPs due to its rich structural variation and diverse range of exotic magnetic behavior [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The structure has two nonequivalent crystallographic sites for Ru- and B-type cations. This arrangement is similar to a geometrically frustrated edge-shared tetrahedra network; therefore, the antiferromagnetic (AF) correlations are frustrated. Nevertheless, several Ru 5 + DPs show exotic magnetic behavior and long-range antiferromagnetic ordering despite a high magnetic frustration. For instance, Ba 2 YRuO 6 (cubic) [11] shows a very high Curie-Weiss temperature (−522 K); however, a long-range magnetic ordering is observed at 37 K and Sr 2 YRuO 6 shows magnetization reversal and exchange bias-like properties [19,22,27]. Monoclinic La 2 LiRuO 6 and La 2 NaRuO 6 also show long-range magnetic ordering despite high magnetic frustrations [28,29]. In addition to the interesting half-filled configuration of Ru 5 + (t 2 g 3 , S = 3/2) cations, the role of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is also crucial in determining the magnetic and physical properties of materials containing 4d (and 5d) [20]. Furthermore, the presence of nonmagnetic B cations and their distribution in the structure can affect the strength of the magnetic correlations. Recently, structurally inhomogeneous double perovskite systems became a topic of immense research due to their potential to show the technologically important exchange bias effect. For instance, the inverse exchange bias effect is observed in (cationic) disordered Gd 2 CoRuO 6 [30]. The antisite disorder in LaSrCoFeO 6 shows a large exchange bias effect with an exchange bias field of 1.2 kOe at 5 K [31]. The antisite disorder in Sm-doped La 2 NiMnO 6 triggers an exchange bias and a spin glass effect [32].
Recently, Kayser et al. [33] highlighted a new Ru-Sc-based double perovskite. Their study showed that the ambient pressure synthesized Ba 2 ScRuO 6 can be stabilized in a 6L hexagonal structure. Interestingly, a disorder of Ru-Sc was observed in the structure. The inhomogeneous distribution of magnetic and nonmagnetic cations in different crystallographic sites in a 6L-type hexagonal structure can cause the emergence of exotic magnetic behavior, such as frustrated magnetism and the exchange bias effect in this compound. Further, the detailed magnetic properties (including the exchange bias effect) have not been explored as yet. Therefore, we explored the detailed magnetic and exchange bias properties in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . Here, we report the detailed magnetic properties and a large exchange bias effect in this ruthenium DP compound. Detailed studies on the cooling field and the influence of temperature on the exchange bias and training effects are presented here.

2. Experimental Section

A standard solid-state reaction method was used to synthesize the polycrystalline Ba 2 ScRuO 6 material. Stoichiometric amounts of BaCO 3 (99.95%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Sc 2 O 3 (99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich), and RuO 2 (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) were homogenized using a mortar and pestel. The sample was first heat treated at 960 °C and then at 1400 °C for 72 h in an air atmosphere. Each step involved several intermediate grinding and pelleting. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected at room temperature (RT) using a PANalytical X’pert PRO diffractometer (Cu K α -radiation, λ = 1.5406). Phase purity and structural analysis were performed by Rietveld analysis using the RT-XRD patterns (using Full Prof suite software (for Windows, Linux and macOS) https://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/ accessed on 21 May 2023). Electrical resistivity ( ρ ) data as a function of temperature were collected in the absence of a magnetic field using a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS, Quantum Design (San Diego, CA, USA)). The temperature-dependent resistivity measurement was carried out using the DC four-probe method. Magnetization measurements as a function of temperature and magnetic field were performed using a Quantum Design MPMS-3 magnetometer. We collected magnetization data in the temperature range of 1.9 K < T < 400 K. The magnetic field variations of the magnetization loops (M-H) were measured between ±2.5 kOe.

3. Results and Discussion

The phase purity and crystal structure were determined using the room temperature (RT) X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD). The Rietveld refinement of the room-temperature X-ray diffraction pattern (Figure 1) highlights that Ba 2 ScRuO 6 crystallizes in a hexagonal phase, space group (S.G.) P 3 ¯ m1 with the Sc and Ru ordering in alternate (001) layers. The final results of the structural analysis (cell parameters and atomic positions) using the RT-XRD pattern are listed in Table 1. The lattice parameters obtained are a = b = 5.80946 (3) Åand c = 14.3028 (3) Åand are in good agreement with the previous report [33]. Four different crystallographic sites (Sc1 (1b, 0, 0, 0.5), Ru1 (2d, 0.33, 0.67, z), Sc2 (1a, 0, 0, 0) and Ru2 (2d, 0.33, 0.67, z)) are used to describe the positions of the Sc and Ru cations (in the crystal structure as shown in Figure 1b they are depicted as M1 (1b), M4 (2d), M3 (1a) and M4 (2d)). As suggested by Kayser et al. [33], in our refinement, a disorder of Ru-Sc is considered in our refinement. The Ru-Sc disorder is observed at crystallographic sites of Sc2 (M3, 1a) and Ru2 (M4, 2d). However, the other two sites, M and M2, are entirely filled by Sc (M1, 1b) and Ru (M2, 2d) cations, respectively. The refinements of the occupancy of the Ba show full occupancy. The positions of the oxygen atoms in the structure are described using three different oxygen positions (Table 1). However, the occupancy of the oxygen positions was fixed during the refinement. A view of the crystal structure for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 material is depicted in Figure 1b. The structure involves the face-sharing M 2 O 9 dimeric units linked by a single corner sharing MO 6 octahedral units. Octahedra with Sc atoms in the center constitute sets of corner-shared MO 6 units. However, the Ru cations occupy the face-sharing positions and connect to the Sc-centered octahedra by corner-sharing. Furthermore, we estimated the crystallite size D = 46 nm using the Debye-Scherrer formula [D = k λ / ( β c o s θ ) , k = shape factor, considered as 0.9, λ = wavelength, β = full-width half maximum, and θ = Bragg angle] [34].
To know about the DC electrical resistivity and its change as a function of temperature, we recorded the DC resistivity data in the absence of an external applied magnetic field using PPMS (Quantum Design). Figure 2 shows the plots of the logarithmic variation of ρ (electrical resistivity) as a function T 1 and T 1 / 4 for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 (in the bottom and top panels, respectively). The material displays an activated conductivity within the studied temperature zone, indicating a semiconducting-type behavior (inset in Figure 2). Previous studies on Ba 2 ScRuO 6 highlight a semiconducting-type behavior with an activation energy of 0.207 eV [33]. As we decrease the temperature, the resistivity starts to increase. Below 150 K, it exceeds the measurement limit of the PPMS (Quantum Design). In the measurement limit (150–300 K), the slope of the ρ (T) plot is not constant but varies with temperature, suggesting Mott variable range hopping (VRH) type conductivity. In a disordered system, the low temperature conduction mechanism is usually described using the localized charge carrier known as the Mott-VRH model. According to Mott-VRH, σ = σ 0 exp [ ( T P / T ) ] 1 / ( 1 + d ) , [ σ = conductivity, d = dimensions, and T P = characteristic temperature] [35]. Consistent with the 3D-VRH model is indicated by a roughly linear response of ln ρ (T) plotted on the T 1 / 4 scale. However, ln ρ (T) vs. T 1 does not show linear behaviors. The linear response of ln ρ (T) plotted in T 1 / 4 scale is analogous to the 3D-VRH transport model and is also realized for other disordered double perovskites, for instance, in Ca 2 CoOsO 6 [36]. Therefore, the electron conduction corresponds to the Mott 3D-VRH model. Carriers are localized due to the disorder.
To understand the magnetic properties of this double perovskite compound, detailed magnetic measurements (magnetization as a function of temperature and magnetic field) were performed using a MPMS 3 magnetometer. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed after cooling the sample from RT to 2 K in a zero field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) mode and under several magnetic fields. The temperature dependence of the ZFC and FC susceptibility ( χ -T) measured at an applied magnetic field H = 1 kOe for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 is displayed in Figure 3a. The ZFC and FC curves are essentially indistinguishable up to ∼9 K. A slight divergence appears below 9 K, showing a magnetic transition. In the ZFC mode, the magnetization shows a pronounced maximum at ∼9 K, signalling a low temperature antiferromagnetic phase due to the magnetic ordering of the Ru 5 + moments as Sc 3 + cations are nonmagnetic. The irreversibility between the ZFC and FC curves may arise due to weak ferromagnetic components, which can possibly be attributed to the frustration between the ordered moments.
The ZFC and FC susceptibility plots after being normalized to the measuring field under several applied fields are illustrated in Figure 3b. The ordering temperature is shifted to lower temperatures for higher applied fields (>1 kOe). The modified Curie-Weiss fitting
χ = χ 0 + N μ B 2 p eff 2 3 k B ( T θ p )
[where p e f f is the effective paramagnetic moment, θ p is the paramagnetic Curie temperature, and χ 0 is the temperature independent term] in the paramagnetic region above 280 K is shown in the inset of Figure 3a. The black line represents the best fit (inset in Figure 3a) to the modified Curie-Weiss equation, which agrees with the experimental data in the high temperature interval. From the fitting between T = 290 K and 380 K, we obtained the Curie constant C = 1.12 emu mol 1 K and the Weiss temperature θ = −694 K. The negative value indicates the strong antiferromagnetic correlations between the Ru 5 + ions. Furthermore, the obtained Weiss temperature is very high and indicates the existence of the frustration of the magnetic moments at high temperatures. The effective magnetic moment (p e f f ), obtained using C as 2.98 μ B , slightly differs from the theoretical value for the Ru 5 + ion (spin-only) with S = 3/2 μ B (3.87 μ B ). However, the calculated value of p e f f is similar to those observed for other hexagonal perovskites containing Ru 2 O 9 dimers, such as Ba 3 YRu 2 O 9 and Ba 3 LaRu 2 O 9 compounds [37]. This can be ascribed to the high spin frustration (f = 77).
The χ -T plots in the presence of several applied magnetic field are shown in Figure 3b. The susceptibility values show a decreasing trend with the increasing magnetic field near the magnetic ordering temperature. The susceptibility curves measured in low magnetic fields below T N = 9 K show high irreversibilities between the ZFC and FC modes. However, increasing the applied magnetic field is found to suppress the irreversibility. The high irreversibility (ZFC and FC susceptibility) can also indicate a spin-glass-type transition. However, to obtain a deeper understanding of the magnetic state of Ba 2 ScRuO 6 , we performed AC susceptibility measurements at different frequencies (10 Hz and 1 kHz). Figure 4 shows the real part ( χ a c ) of our AC susceptibility measurements. The peak position in the AC susceptibility curves shows no frequency-dependent shift, confirming the absence of spin-glass-type behavior in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . To further understand the magnetic behavior in detail, magnetic isotherms (M-H) were obtained between ±25 kOe at different temperatures (between 2 and 15 K) in zero field-cooling mode (Figure 5). A linear magnetization (AFM type) change with very small hysteresis behavior was observed. The small observed hysteresis could be due to frustration in the structure.
In recent times, there has been significant interest in exploring and understanding the effects of exchange bias (EB) in structurally inhomogeneous systems with various combinations of magnetic cations [30,31,32,38,39,40,41]. In the exchange bias effect, the field-cooled (FC) M-H loops show a shift along the magnetic field axis, and this is used in several technological applications, such as magnetic recording read heads [42], random access memories [43], and other spintronics devices [44,45]. To explore the EB behavior in the present sample, we measured M-H loops at selected temperatures in the field-cooling condition ( H F C = 20 kOe). The M-H loops were measured in the FC mode between ±25 kOe. For all M-H measurements (ZFC and FC), the material was cooled from T > T N to the measuring temperature (T m e a s ), and the M-H data were obtained in the field range ± 25 kOe when reached T m e a s . The FC M-H curves measured at 2 K are shown in Figure 5. Interestingly, the field-cooled M-H loops shifted along the negative field axis. A representative result, as illustrated in Figure 6, highlights a shift of the center of the M-H curve along the negative magnetic field axis around 1.24 kOe. Being a classic signature of unidirectional anisotropy, the shift of the magnetization loop (M-H) reveals the surprising existence of the EB effect in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . The offset of the M-H curve along the field axis can be denoted as the exchange bias field H E B and the coercive field H C , and can be extracted from the M-H loops [ H C = ( H + H ) /2 and H E B = ( H + + H ) /2, respectively. Here, H + and H are the coercivities in the ascending and descending branch of the M-H curve with a field axis].
The choice of cooling field is extremely important in exchange bias measurements. To choose a suitable H F C for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 , the M-H loops were obtained at 5 K while cooling the sample in different magnetic field ranging from 0.5 kOe to 40 kOe; this is depicted in Figure 7a. H E B increases with the cooling field up to 10 kOe, and then it exhibits a saturation tendency for H F C above 10 kOe [see Figure 7b]. Therefore, we considered a cooling field of 20 kOe (more than 10 kOe) to study the EB effect in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 .
It is important to know whether the exchange bias properties are associated with the long-range magnetic ordering in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . Therefore, we measured several M-H curves at various fixed temperatures. The characteristic temperature-dependent trend of the exchange bias field and coercivity with the measuring temperature for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 is summarized in Figure 8. A large value of the exchange bias field ( H E B ) of 1.24 kOe is observed at 2 K. In comparison, the Ru-based disordered Gd 2 CoRuO 6 shows a very small exchange bias field (≈160 Oe) below 5 K [30]. Double perovskite Sr 2 YbRuO 6 shows a tunable exchange bias; however, the maximum exchange bias field is observed as ≈800 Oe at 2 K [46]. Very recently, in structurally disordered Ba 3 CoRu 2 O 9 , a large exchange bias field of 3.48 kOe at 3 K is observed with a cooling field of 50 kOe [47]. However, a smooth decrease in the exchange bias field ( H E B ) and the coercivity ( H c ) is observed when increasing the temperature, eventually vanishing above T N = 9 K. Therefore, the appearance of the exchange bias field and coercivity below the magnetic ordering temperature indicates its relation with the magnetic correlations in the structure. In addition, for the long-range AFM ordering ( T N = 9 K) the disorder in the Ru-Sc layers could create the magnetic frustration (Weiss temperature = −694 K, f = 77). The high magnetic frustration in the structure, therefore, can create e an exchange bias effect below T N = 9 K.
The uncompensated spin configuration of the present system can relax from its equilibrium configuration in the presence of suitably applied magnetic fields. Therefore, the system is trained by increasing the number of successive hysteresis loops (M-H). In these connections, an important property generally highlighted in EB materials is the training effect. This can be described as reducing the exchange bias field H E B as the M -H curve shrinks when cycling the material in several consecutive M-H loops. Figure 9a shows the enlarged version of the central portion of the representative magnetic loop recorded at 2 K in the negative field quadrant after the field cooled to 20 kOe. Here, a prominent training effect is observed. The H E B as a function of the loop cycles (n) is shown in Figure 9b. The training effect is generally considered as a direct macroscopic fingerprint of the rearrangements of the spins toward equilibrium [see Figure 9] [48,49]. The training effect becomes prominent after the first magnetic field cycling due to the reconfiguration of the frozen spins. Reconfiguration in the spin structure results in a sharp decrease in H E B after the first magnetic field cycle. Consequently, the change in H E B after the second field cycling is moderate.
The usual relationship between H E B and n (for n > 1) that describes the relaxation of the EB effect is known to lead to a simple power law relationship [16]:
H E B ( n ) H E = k / n .
Here, H E B (n) = exchange bias field in the nth cycle, H E = exchange field in the limit n , and K = system-dependent constant. The best-fit results (dotted line) are shown in Figure 9b. The value of H E obtained from the fitting is 606.24 Oe and this is the remnant H E in the material.
Furthermore, an additional approach is required to explain the training effect since the power law as described in Equation (2) breaks down for n = 1. It was proposed in the framework of non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and it causes a relaxation toward equilibrium in the spin configuration of the interface magnetization (antiferromagnetic). In fact, to better describe the exchange bias effect and its dependence on the number of field cycles (n), a recursive formula is considered [50]:
H E B ( n + 1 ) H E B ( n ) = γ ( H E B ( n ) H E ) 3 ,
where γ = sample dependent constant (= 1/2 k 2 ) and H E = exchange bias field in n. Using γ = 1.28×10 6 Oe 2 and H E = 606.24 Oe (generated from the power law fitting as shown in Equation (2)) as an additional input in Equation (3), the whole set of results can be generated for H E B . We displayed the obtained results by open (orange) triangles in Figure 9b. We list all magnetic parameters in Table 2.
Giant EB effects have recently been reported in several similar double perovskite materials having cationic disorders (for instance, in hexagonal Ba 2 Fe 1.12 Os 0.88 O 6 [39], in Gd 2 CoRuO 6 [30], and in LaSrCoFeO 6 [31]). The presence of antisite disorder originates from competing magnetic interactions and frustrations in the system and is attributed to the huge EB effects in these systems. Material systems with different crystallographic sites for magnetic cations are prone to antisite disorder. In the present material, a disorder between Ru-Sc is observed at both the Sc2 (M3, 1a, corner-sharing B 2 O 6 sites) and Ru2 (M4, 2d, face-sharing B 2 O 9 dimer) sites. However, the degree of disorder is less than the Ba 2 Fe 1.12 Os 0.88 O 6 material. Therefore, similar to the Ba 2 Fe 1.12 Os 0.88 O 6 and other related materials, the disorder in Sc-Ru, which is creating magnetic frustration, is responsible for the EB effect in Ba 2 ScRuO 6 below the AFM ordering temperature.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the ambient pressure synthesized Ba 2 ScRuO 6 is found to crystallize in a 6L hexagonal structure (space group P 3 ¯ m1) at room temperature. Electron conduction corresponds to the Mott 3D-VRH model, and the disorder initiates carrier localization. This antiferromagnetic double perovskite compound Ba 2 ScRuO 6 shows an exchange bias below the long-range antiferromagnetic ordering ( T N = 9 K). The exchange bias effect is seen below the AFM ordering temperature when the sample is cooled in the presence of a magnetic field ( H F C = 20 kOe) and reaches a maximum value of 1.24 kOe at 2 K. Furthermore, exchange bias is supported by training effect studies. Inhomogeneous magnetic correlations and magnetic frustration formed due to the disorder of magnetic (Ru) and nonmagnetic (Sc) cations at both the Sc2 (1a, corner-sharing B 2 O 6 sites) and Ru2 (2d, face-sharing B 2 O 9 dimer) sites. The magnetic frustrations in the structure below the long-range AFM ordering create a large EB effect in this sample. This indicates that cationic disorder-induced magnetic frustration can be used to trigger the exchange bias effect. Furthermore, our study suggests that the frustrated hexagonal double perovskite systems are a promising family of compounds to explore new materials that have a large exchange bias effect.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, P.M. and S.M.; Investigation, P.M. and S.M.; Writing—original draft, S.M. and R.P.S.; Writing—review & editing, S.M. and R.P.S.; Supervision, R.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.P.S. acknowledges the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India, for the CRG/2019/001028 Core Research Grant. S.M. acknowledges the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India for the SRG/2021/001993 Start-up Research Grant.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kobayashi, K.I.; Kimura, T.; Sawada, H.; Terakura, K.; Tokura, Y. Room-temperature magnetoresistance in an oxide material with an ordered double-perovskite structure. Nature 1998, 395, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Serrate, D.; Teresa, J.M.D.; Ibarra, M.R. Double perovskites with ferromagnetism above room temperature. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 023201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kato, H.; Okuda, T.; Okimoto, Y.; Tomioka, Y.; Takenoya, Y.; Ohkubo, A.; Kawasaki, M.; Tokura, Y. Metallic ordered double-perovskite Sr2CrReO6 with maximal Curie temperature of 635 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Das, H.; Sanyal, P.; Saha-Dasgupta, T.; Sharma, D.D. Origin of magnetism and trend in Tc in Cr-based double perovskites: Interplay of two driving mechanisms. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 104418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Narayanan, N.; Mikhailova, D.; Senyshyn, A.; Trots, D.M.; Laskowski, R.; Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Fuess, H.; Ehrenberg, H. Temperature and composition dependence of crystal structures and magnetic and electronic properties of the double perovskites La2-xSrxCoIrO6 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2). Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 024403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kolchinskaya, A.; Komissinskiy, P.; Baghaie, Y.M.; Vafaee, M.; Mikhailova, D.; Narayanan, N.; Ehrenberg, H.; Wilhelm, F.; Rogalev, A.; Alff, L. Magnetism and spin-orbit coupling in Ir-based double perovskites La2-xSrxCoIrO6. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 224422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, H.L.; Schnelle, W.; Tjeng, L.H.; Jansen, M. Synthesis, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of double perovskites SrLaNiOsO6 and BaLaNiOsO6. Solid State Commun. 2016, 243, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morrow, R.; Yan, J.; McGuire, M.A.; Freeland, J.W.; Haskel, D.; Woodward, P.M. Effects of chemical pressure on the magnetic ground states of the osmate double perovskites SrCaCoOsO6 and Ca2CoOsO6. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 094435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, H.; Zhu, S.; Ou, X.; Wu, H. Ferrimagnetism in the double perovskite Ca2FeOsO6: A density functional study. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 054406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hou, Y.S.; Xiang, H.J.; Gong, X.G. Lattice-distortion Induced Magnetic Transition from Low-temperature Antiferromagnetism to High-temperature Ferrimagnetism in Double Perovskites A2FeOsO6 (A= Ca, Sr). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nilsen, G.J.; Thompson, C.M.; Ehlers, G.; Marjerrison, C.A.; Greedan, J.E. Diffuse magnetic neutron scattering in the highly frustrated double perovskite Ba2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 054415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carlo, J.P.; Clancy, J.P.; Fritsch, K.; Marjerrison, C.A.; Granroth, G.E.; Greedan, J.E.; Dabkowska, H.A.; Gaulin, B.D. Spin gap and the nature of the 4d3 magnetic ground state in the frustrated fcc antiferromagnet Ba2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 024418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dass, R.I.; Yan, J.Q.; Goodenough, J.B. Ruthenium double perovskites: Transport and magnetic properties. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 094416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hinatsu, Y.; Izumiyama, Y.; Doi, Y.; Alemi, A.; Wakeshima, M.; Nakamura, A.; Morii, Y.J. Studies on magnetic and calorimetric properties of double perovskites Ba2HoRuO6 and Ba2HoIrO6. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, K.P.; Choi, Y.H.; Kwon, Y.U.; Jung, D.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Shim, H.S.; Lee, C.H. Atomic and magnetic long-range orderings in BaLaMRuO6 (M= Mg and Zn). J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 150, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Battle, P.D.; Goodenough, J.B.; Price, R.J. The crystal structures and magnetic properties of Ba2LaRuO6 and Ca2LaRuO6. Solid State Chem. 1983, 46, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Battle, P.D.; Jones, C.W.J. The crystal and magnetic structures of Sr2LuRuO6, Ba2YRuO6, and Ba2LuRuO6. Solid State Chem. 1989, 78, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Battle, P.D.; Macklin, W.J. The crystal and magnetic structures of Sr2YRuO6. J. Solid State Chem. 1984, 52, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Disseler, S.M.; Lynn, J.W.; Jardim, R.F.; Torikachvili, M.S.; Granado, E. Spin dynamics and two-dimensional correlations in the fcc antiferromagnetic Sr2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 140407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aczel, A.A.; Baker, P.J.; Bugaris, D.E.; Yeon, J.; Loye, H.C.Z.; Guidi, T.; Adroja, D.T. Exotic Magnetism on the Quasi-fcc Lattices of the d3 Double Perovskites La2NaB’O6 (B’= Ru, Os). Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 117603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ranjbar, B.; Pavan, A.; Kennedy, B.J.; Zhang, Z.M. Structural and magnetic properties of the ruthenium double perovskites Ba2-xSrxYRuO6. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 10689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Granado, E.; Lynn, J.W.; Jardim, R.F.; Torikachvili, M.S. Two-Dimensional Magnetic Correlations and Partial Long-Range Order in Geometrically Frustrated Sr2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 017202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Takahashi, R.; Okazaki, R.; Yasui, Y.; Terasaki, I.; Sudayama, T.; Nakao, H.; Yamasaki, Y.; Okamoto, J.; Murakami, Y.; Kitajima, Y.J. High-temperature thermoelectric properties of the double-perovskite ruthenium oxide (Sr1-xLax)2ErRuO6. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 073714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cetin, S.K.; Akca, G.; Kaya, D.; Ayas, A.O.; Ekicibil, A. Synthesis and characterization of bifunctional Ru doped La-based perovskites for magnetic refrigeration and energy storage systems. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 40999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dani, S.; Arya, A.; Sharma, H.; Kumar, R.; Goyal, N.; Kumar, R.; Pandit, R. Structural and electronic properties of double perovskite ruthenates; A2GdRuO6 (where A= Ba, Sr). J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 913, 165177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guenez, W.; Bouguerra, A.; Touaibia, I.; Chemam, F. Giant magneto optical properties in the double perovskites Ba2B’RuO6 (B’= Er, Tm). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2022, 34, 505501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, R.P.; Tomy, C.V. Anomalous magnetic properties of Sr2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 024432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aharen, T.; Greedan, J.E.; Ning, F.L.; Imai, T.; Michaelis, V.K.; Kroeker, S.; Zhou, H.D.; Wiebe, C.R.; Cranswick, L.M.D. Magnetic properties of the S= 3/2 geometrically frustrated double perovskites La2LiRuO6 and Ba2YRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 134423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aczel, A.A.; Bugaris, D.E.; Li, L.; Yan, J.-Q.; Cruz, C.d.; Loye, H.-C.z.; Nagler, S.E. Frustration by competing interactions in the highly distorted double perovskites La2NaB’O6 (B’= Ru, Os). Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 014435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, M.; Dutta, P.; Giri, S.; Majumdar, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Yadav, A.K.; Jha, S.N.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Das, G.; Rajaji, V. Cationic disorder: A pathway for demonstrating inverse exchange bias in Gd2CoRuO6. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 064419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sahoo, R.C.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ohtomo, A.; Hossain, Z. Exchange bias and spin glass states driven by antisite disorder in the double perovskite compound LaSrCoFeO6. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 214436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hissariya, R.; Sathe, V.G.; Mishra, S.K. Antisite disorder mediated exchange bias effect and spin-glass state in La2-xSmxNiMnO6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2023, 578, 170769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kayser, P.; Injac, S.; Ranjbar, B.; Kennedy, B.J. Magnetic and Structural Studies of Sc Containing Ruthenate Double Perovskites A2ScRuO6 (A = Ba, Sr). Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 9009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shannon, R. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mott, N.F. Conduction in non-crystalline materials: III. Localized states in a pseudogap and near extremities of conduction and valence bands. Philos. Mag. 1969, 19, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morrow, R.; Samanta, K.; Dasgupta, T.S.; Xiong, J.; Freeland, J.W.; Haskel, D.; Woodward, P.M. Magnetism in Ca2CoOsO6 and Ca2NiOsO6: Unraveling the Mystery of Superexchange Interactions between 3d and 5d Ions. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Senn, M.S.; Kimber, S.A.J.; Lopez, A.M.A.; Hill, A.H.; Attfield, J.P. Spin orders and lattice distortions of geometrically frustrated 6H-perovskites Ba3B’Ru2O9 (B’= La3+, Nd3+, and Y3+). Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 134402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paul, A.K.; Jansen, M.; Yan, B.; Felser, C.; Reehuis, M.; Abdala, P.M. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Physical Properties of Sr2FeOsO6. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, H.L.; Adler, P.; Reehuis, M.; Schnelle, W.; Pattison, P.; Hoser, A.; Felser, C.; Jansen, M. High-Temperature Ferrimagnetism with Large Coercivity and Exchange Bias in the Partially Ordered 3d/5d Hexagonal Perovskite Ba2Fe1.12Os0.88O6. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mohanty, P.; Marik, S.; Singh, D.; Singh, R.P. Room temperature magnetoresistance and exchange bias in “314-type” oxygen-vacancy ordered SrCo0.85Fe0.15O2.62. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 022402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Marik, S.; Mohanty, P.; Singh, D.; Singh, R.P. Moderate magnetic field induced large exchange bias effect in ferrimagnetic 314—Sr3YCo4O10.5 material. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 065006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsang, C.; Fontana, R.E.; Lin, T.; Heim, D.; Speriosu, V.S.; Gurney, B.A.; Williams, M.L. Design, fabrication and testing of spin-valve read heads for high density recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1994, 30, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Prejbeanu, I.L.; Kerekes, M.; Sousa, R.C.; Sibuet, H.; Redon, O.; Dieny, B.; Nozieres, J.P. Thermally assisted MRAM. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 165218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Y.T.; Jen, S.U.; Yao, Y.D.; Wu, J.M.; Liao, J.H.; Wu, T.B. Exchange biasing observed in the Co/Ir20Mn80 system. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 448, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fuke, H.; Kamiguchi, Y.; Hashimoto, S.; Funiyama, T.; Saito, K.; Iwasaki, H.; Sahashi, M. Exchange coupling film and magnetoresistive element. U.S. Patent 6057049, 2 May 2000. [Google Scholar]
  46. Singh, R.P.; Tomy, C.V.; Grover, A.K. Observation of tunable exchange bias in Sr2YbRuO6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 182505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kurian, M.M.; Das, R.R.; Devan, C.V.; Varma, M.R.; Colin, C.V.; Santhosh, P.N. Exchange bias effect and inhomogeneous magnetism in 6H Ba3CoFeRuO9: Role of structural site disorder. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2023, 568, 170372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoffmann, A. Symmetry driven irreversibilities at ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 097203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Binek, C.; Polisetty, S.; He, X.; Berger, A. Exchange bias training effect in coupled all ferromagnetic bilayer structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 067201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Binek, C. Training of the exchange-bias effect: A simple analytic approach. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 014421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Rietveld refinement plot of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained at room temperature and (b) the hexagonal perovskite-type structure representation (space group P 3 ¯ m1) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . The Ba atoms are shown as blue spheres. Oxygen atoms are highlighted as red spheres. The center of the polyhedra is occupied by Sc and Ru cations. Ru occupies mainly the M2 and M4 sites (face-shared). Scandium occupies the corner-shared M1 and M3 sites.
Figure 1. (a) Rietveld refinement plot of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained at room temperature and (b) the hexagonal perovskite-type structure representation (space group P 3 ¯ m1) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . The Ba atoms are shown as blue spheres. Oxygen atoms are highlighted as red spheres. The center of the polyhedra is occupied by Sc and Ru cations. Ru occupies mainly the M2 and M4 sites (face-shared). Scandium occupies the corner-shared M1 and M3 sites.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g001
Figure 2. Electrical resistivity (ln ρ ) as a function of T 1 and T 1 / 4 (150 to 300 K) displayed on the bottom and top axes, respectively. The corresponding plot of resistivity vs. temperature ( ρ vs. T) is shown in the inset.
Figure 2. Electrical resistivity (ln ρ ) as a function of T 1 and T 1 / 4 (150 to 300 K) displayed on the bottom and top axes, respectively. The corresponding plot of resistivity vs. temperature ( ρ vs. T) is shown in the inset.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g002
Figure 3. (a) Temperature variation of magnetic susceptibility (ZFC and FC, H = 1 kOe) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . (b) Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility curves (FC and ZFC) in different applied fields.
Figure 3. (a) Temperature variation of magnetic susceptibility (ZFC and FC, H = 1 kOe) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . (b) Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility curves (FC and ZFC) in different applied fields.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g003
Figure 4. The temperature dependent real part ( χ ) of the AC susceptibility data for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 .
Figure 4. The temperature dependent real part ( χ ) of the AC susceptibility data for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 .
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g004
Figure 5. Zero field-cooled magnetization curves as a function of magnetic field (M-H) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 measured at several temperatures.
Figure 5. Zero field-cooled magnetization curves as a function of magnetic field (M-H) for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 measured at several temperatures.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g005
Figure 6. Field-cooled ( H F C = 20 kOe)) M-H loop for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 measured at 2 K. The inset illustrates the enlarged central part of the FC M-H loop.
Figure 6. Field-cooled ( H F C = 20 kOe)) M-H loop for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 measured at 2 K. The inset illustrates the enlarged central part of the FC M-H loop.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g006
Figure 7. (a) M-H loops measured at T = 5 K with different H F C values (0.5 kOe to 40 kOe). The inset highlights the central and enlarged part of the M-H loops. (b) Variation of H E B with different values of H F C (0.5 to 40 kOe).
Figure 7. (a) M-H loops measured at T = 5 K with different H F C values (0.5 kOe to 40 kOe). The inset highlights the central and enlarged part of the M-H loops. (b) Variation of H E B with different values of H F C (0.5 to 40 kOe).
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g007
Figure 8. Left axis: Temperature dependent H E B for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . The H E B values are obtained from the FC M-H curves measured at several temperatures. Right axis: Temperature dependent H C obtained from the same M-H loops.
Figure 8. Left axis: Temperature dependent H E B for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 . The H E B values are obtained from the FC M-H curves measured at several temperatures. Right axis: Temperature dependent H C obtained from the same M-H loops.
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g008
Figure 9. (a) The expanded view of the central part of the consecutive M-H loops. (b) The dependence of H E B on the number of field cycles (n) (diamond markers) obtained from the consecutive M-H loops (training effect). The green line is the best fit to Equation (2) for n > 1. Data points in open triangles (orange) are generated using Equation (3).
Figure 9. (a) The expanded view of the central part of the consecutive M-H loops. (b) The dependence of H E B on the number of field cycles (n) (diamond markers) obtained from the consecutive M-H loops (training effect). The green line is the best fit to Equation (2) for n > 1. Data points in open triangles (orange) are generated using Equation (3).
Magnetochemistry 09 00144 g009
Table 1. Structural parameters for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 at RT extracted from Rietveld refinement of the XRD powder diffraction data.
Table 1. Structural parameters for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 at RT extracted from Rietveld refinement of the XRD powder diffraction data.
AtomWyck. Positionxyz
Ba12c000.25
Ba22d0.330.670.102
Ba32d0.330.670.413
Sc1 (M1)1b000.5
Sc2 (M3)1a000
Ru1 (M2)2d0.330.670.661
Ru2 (M4)2d0.330.670.848
O16i0.162−0.1620.299
O26i0.820−0.8200.081
O36i0.835−0.8350.415
Structure: Hexagonal, Space group: P 3 ¯ m1; a (Å) = 5.80946(3), b (Å) = 5.80946(3), c (Å) = 14.3028(3); α = β = 90 deg, γ = 120 deg,  V c e l l 3 ) = 418.04.
Table 2. Magnetic parameters for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 .
Table 2. Magnetic parameters for Ba 2 ScRuO 6 .
ParametersUnitBa 2 ScRuO 6
Crystallite size (D)nm46 nm
Transition temperature (T N )K9
Weiss temperatureK−694
Frustration parameter (f)-77
Cooling field (H F C )kOe20 kOe
Exchange bias field (H E B )kOe1.24 (at 2 K)
Exchange bias field n (H E )Oe606.24
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohanty, P.; Marik, S.; Singh, R.P. Magnetism and Exchange Bias Properties in Ba2ScRuO6. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060144

AMA Style

Mohanty P, Marik S, Singh RP. Magnetism and Exchange Bias Properties in Ba2ScRuO6. Magnetochemistry. 2023; 9(6):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060144

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohanty, Prachi, Sourav Marik, and Ravi Prakash Singh. 2023. "Magnetism and Exchange Bias Properties in Ba2ScRuO6" Magnetochemistry 9, no. 6: 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9060144

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop