Next Article in Journal
A New Approach for Extending Shelf-Life of Pomegranate Arils with Combined Application of Salicylic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate
Previous Article in Journal
Light Intensity during Green-Leaf Butterhead Lettuce Propagation Influences Yield and Carotenoids at Harvest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Screening and Biological Activities of Diospyros villosa (L.) De Winter Leaf and Stem-Bark Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mentha arvensis and Mentha × piperita-Vital Herbs with Myriads of Pharmaceutical Benefits

1
School of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
2
Power Technology Center, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Research Institute, Jinan 250002, China
3
College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
4
Faculty of Agriculture, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu 603201, India
5
Department of Computer Science AI, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Chennai 601103, India
6
Evolutionary Developmental (Evo-Devo) Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India
7
National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020224
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 2 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Activities of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants)

Abstract

:
Mentha arvensis L. and Mentha × piperita L. are herbal plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family and are widely cultivated for their essential oils and culinary uses. These herbs are commercially valuable mints used in the preparation of herbal formulations, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and in food industries. Due to the presence of potential secondary metabolites, mints were employed to treat various disorders since ancient times in traditional medicines. The extracts of M. arvensis and M. × piperita can improve the function of digestive system, central nervous system and respiratory system of the human body. Majority of the health benefits of these herbs are attributed by the essential oil components. In addition, the administration of M. arvensis and M. × piperita under various pathological conditions studied in vitro and in vivo facilitated the recovery of detrimental ailments. Due to the increasing demand for natural product-based medicines, research is focused on the utilization of phytochemicals to treat various ailments. In order to provide a comprehensive overview of health benefits of M. arvensis and M. × piperita, the present endeavor deals with the antioxidant property, anti-inflammatory property, anti-microbial, and anti-cancer activities of both species. However, a deeper knowledge on the specific metabolites of M. arvensis and M. × piperita and their mode of action against different disease targets will accelerate the discovery of novel natural drugs with less side effects and higher efficiency.

1. Introduction

Plants are viable reservoirs of phytochemicals with diverse medicinal values which form the vital ingredients for various pharmaceutical and herbal formulations [1]. Majority of the medicinal properties of plants are attributed by secondary metabolites. These metabolites render color, flavor, and aroma to plants which are utilized in food and drug industries [2]. Moreover, herbal plants are widely used in several cuisines as spices and condiments [3]. The chemo-diversity of secondary metabolites corresponds to different biological functions. According to World Health Organization (WHO), about 80% of population are interested on the utilization of traditional medicine which involves botanical isolates [4]. In recent times, research is ongoing particularly with respect to the gene or gene clusters associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis [5] and organ specific accumulation of secondary metabolites with therapeutic values [6]. To facilitate the investigation of mint based bioactive compounds, the present endeavor provides a comprehensive overview of secondary metabolites and nutraceutical effects of two commercially important mints such as Mentha arvensis L. and Mentha × piperita L.
Mints are herbaceous plants with a collection of more than 60 species belonging to Lamiaceae family originated from Mediterranean basin and spread throughout the world by both natural and artificial means [7]. Mints are used as flavoring agents in food, beverage, chewing gums, and candies [8]. It is considered as healthy leafy vegetable because of its vitamins and mineral nutrients [9]. Due to the presence of potential secondary metabolites, mint was employed to treat various disorders since antiquity in ayurvedic and Chinese medicines [10]. The decoctions of mint aids in reduction of swelling, pain reliver, and is often used for the treatment of headache and eye redness, arthralgia, rubella, measles, chest, and hypochasm distension [10,11]. Numerous studies have evidenced that mint extracts can improve the digestive system, central nervous system, and respiratory system of the human body, and have anti-inflammatory antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, antioxidation and other effects [12,13,14]. The abovementioned curing effects of mints are because of the occurrence of pharmaceutically valuable bioactive compounds. The main volatile components of mint include: menthol, menthone, menthyl acetate, menthofuran, and 1,8-cineol., etc. [15,16,17,18]. Non-volatile components present in mint are: flavonoids, phenolic acids, amino acids, nucleosides, terpenoids, etc., which are also the main active components of mint to play anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects [19,20]. The proportion and content of these components were affected by various factors such as growing environment, harvesting time, and variations in the species [21]. Among mint species, M. arvensis L. and M. × piperita L. are widely cultivated for the essential oil. M. arvensis is originated in the temperate climate of Europe, West Asia, and Central Asia [22]. M. × piperita is a natural hybrid between M. viridis and M. aquatica originated in the Mediterranean region [23]. The morphological differences of the two mint species are summarized in Table 1. Both mint species also displayed differences in content of essential oils. The essential oil of M. arvensis is made up of 30 to 50% menthol, 15 to 30% menthone, 3 to 10% menthyl acetate, and 1 to 5% other terpenes [24], whereas in M. × piperita, menthol accounted for about 36%, menthone 21%, menthyl acetate 7%, eucalyptol 7%, isomenthone 5%, neomenthol 4%, menthofuran 3%, D-limonene 2%, b-caryophyllene 2%, pulegone 1%, and b-pinene 1% [25]. Both mint species contributed to human health as excellent medicinal plants and raw materials for essential oil extraction.
The extracts of M. arvensis has been indulged in folklore medicine for the treatment of several diseases such as peptic ulcer, indigestion, skin allergies, respiratory diseases, etc. [26]. Various tissues of M. arvensis possess diverse medicinal properties. For instance, the decoctions obtained from leaf acts as diuretic agent, used to treat cold, asthma, rheumatism, jaundice, and other liver diseases [26]. M. arvensis oil, act as a natural source of anti-aflatoxigenic and antioxidant properties, protects the stored food commodities [27]. Furthermore, the essential oil provides a variety of health benefits, including antioxidant [28], anti-inflammatory [29], and antibacterial properties [30]. The essential oil from M. arvensis can serve as a natural pesticide [22]. Similarly, M. × piperita L. (peppermint) is a vital species in mint family with recognized pharmacological properties. It has been widely cultivated for its numerous benefits in agriculture, food, and medicinal purposes [31]. The essential oil of M. × piperita consists of myriads of bioactive phytochemicals with potential to treat several ailments [32,33,34]. The essential oils and secondary metabolites extracted from both mint species consisted of various health benefits.

2. Phytochemicals of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

Diverse bioactive phytochemicals were present in leaves, stem, and root tissues of M. arvensis [35]. The major components in M. arvensis are alkaloids, flavonoids, polyphenols, tannins, cardiac glycosides, and eugenol [35]. Flavonoids and terpenoids are mostly present in the leaves whereas diterpenes occur in both leaves and stems [35]. The M. arvensis consists of monoterpenes such as menthone, isomenthone, menthofuran, menthyl acetate cineole, limonene, and sesquiterpenes such as viridiflorol [22,24]. Flavonoids such as luteolin, menthoside, isorhoifolin, rutin hesperidin were also identified in M. arvensis [36]. Further, it also contains phenolic acids like caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid [37,38]. Triterpenes like squalene, α-amyrin, urosolic acid and sitosterol and phytol compounds like tocopherols, carotenoids, choline, betaine, cyclenes, rosmarinic acid, and tannin were also identified in M. arvensis [28]. Interestingly, a unique component linarin (acacetin-7-O-β-D-rutionside) was detected in the flower tissue of M. arvensis [39]. Similarly, M. × piperita also consists of numerous phenolic compounds such as caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, eriocitrin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, gallic acid, p-Coumaric acid, chloregenic acid, sinapic acid, ellagic acid, hesperidin, and trans-ferulic acid [40,41,42]. Occurrence of flavones such as eriodictyol, naringenin, and hesperidin were identified in the leaf tissue of M. × piperita [43]. Leaf also consists of aglycones, palmitic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, ascorbic acid, and soluble sugars [31]. Moreover, the presence of vital mineral nutrients such as potassium, calcium, sodium, phosphorus, zinc, and magnesium were also identified in the dried leaves of M. × piperita [44]. In general, the vital essential oil contents are present in the glandular trichomes of M. × piperita [11,45]. Phytochemical analysis of M. × piperita essential oil revealed the presence of several components such as menthone, iso-menthone, menthol, d-carvone, limonene, pulegone, and methyl petroselinate [46]. In addition, lignans and stilbenes were also identified in the extracts of M. × piperita [11]. Taken together, the occurrence of bioactive phytochemicals with diverse beneficial properties makes both mint species an economically important choice for cultivation.

3. Uses of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

Both Mentha species are widely utilized in food and beverage industries, cosmetics, agrochemicals, and herbal medicines due to presence of diverse phytochemicals [22,47,48]. The Mentha oil extracted from both species consists of a cooling effect, slight bitter taste, and strong aroma; due to these reasons, it can enhance the flavor and aroma of several products [48]. For instance, mint oil is used as the flavoring agent in candies, chewing gums, sauces, and beverages [47,48,49,50]. Moreover, the menthol-based cooling effect can act as a pain reliever which is a vital component in several pain-relieving balms and ointments [48,49,50]. Mentha-based dental products such as toothpastes and mouthwash causes a soothing cool effect in the oral cavities [49]. Further, Mentha oils are widely used essential oils for aromatherapy to relive stress and fatigue [51]. A recent study by Lin et al. [52] has demonstrated the changes occurring in electronencephalographic activity upon inhalation of peppermint oil under different visual stimuli. The results suggested that inhalation of peppermint oil enhanced the production of alpha waves in the pre-frontal area responsible for learning and thinking in white-sniffing group [52]. Additionally, the insect repellent property of mint oil is utilized to produce safer agro-chemicals and biopesticides [22]. The mint-based fodders are also employed in animal husbandry [53]. According to Masouri et al., [54] the supplementation of diet with peppermint oil increased the digestion of minerals and improved the meat quality in Japanese quails. Similarly, dietary supplementation of mint enhanced the egg laying capacity of hens [55]. Another wider usage of mint is in herbal medicines. Since antiquity mint is used to treat several ailments in various part of the world [46,47,48,49,50]. Mint are widely used to treat inflammation, bronchitis, toothaches, cramps, fever, headaches, and sore throat, etc. [46,47,48,49]. Moreover, the extracts of mint are employed in the treatment against intestinal colic, digestive disorders, ailments associated with gall bladders, gastric ulcers, and other gastrointestinal diseases [46,47,48,49,50]. The immense positive benefits of mints are widely attributed by its phytochemical constitutes with nutraceutical effects. However, some reports also illustrated the side effects of M. × piperita essential oil such as headache, vomiting, nausea, gastrointestinal discomforts, and heartburn [46,47,48,49]. This denotes a deeper knowledge on the mode of action of phytochemicals on disease targets is required. Therefore, in the future, research will focus on the development of novel mint based herbal formulation and identification of novel drug molecule with higher efficacy and lesser side effects has to be conducted.

4. Antioxidant Properties of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

Detoxification of harmful reactive oxygen species in higher concentrations generated in biological systems is inevitable for the proper physiological and metabolic functioning of an organism. The oxidative stress caused by these free radicals damages cellular proteins, lipids, and DNA molecules which results in diverse pathological conditions/diseases [56]. Natural compounds with antioxidant properties particularly from plant origin are always in demand. Plants consists of various phytochemicals with antioxidant compounds which facilitate the recovery from oxidative damages. These antioxidant property of plant extracts can be validated using various in vitro assays such as 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) (DPPH) radical scavenging, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS+) analysis, and reducing power assays [47,57,58]. In most of these assays, the free radicals are propagated in a media which can be detoxified by the extract if it has antioxidant capacity, and this can be spectrophotometrically measured and compared with control like ascorbic acid. In general, polyphenolic compounds readily take part in the transfer of electrons and hydrogen atoms which attributes their antioxidant properties. To assess these potentials, the ability of the plant extract to reduce iron in the reaction mixture by the extracts are tested using various in vitro assays.
Apart from this mechanism, the phytochemicals can also act as chain terminators of free radicals making the unstable radicals into non-reactive stable compounds [43]. Several studies have evidenced the antioxidant properties of M. arvensis and M. × piperita using the invitro antioxidant assays. For instance, Dorman et al. [43] illustrated the antioxidant potentials of M. × piperita extracted using different solvents which resulted in extraction efficiencies with different quantities and qualities. Among the solvents employed, methanolic extracts of M. × piperita leaves displayed higher quantitative levels of total phenols and flavonoids. However, the significant qualitative antioxidants were observed in the ethanolic extracts of M. × piperita with eriocitrin, rosmarinic acid, and naringenin-7-o-glucoside. Extracts of M. × piperita displayed significant antioxidant property evidenced from increased reduction of iron(III), higher efficiency in DPPH, ABTS+, and H2O2 free radical scavenging properties [43]. Recent report by Hammad Al-Mijalli et al. [59] determined the volatile chemical compounds in M. × piperita and evidenced its antioxidant properties. Likewise, the M. arvensis extracts illustrated significant free radical scavenging activities. Biswas et al. [28] validated antioxidant potentials of M. arvensis qualitatively using thin layer chromatography (TLC) and quantitatively by using DPPH assay. Moreover, the aqueous extracts of M. arvensis displayed varying levels of antioxidant properties in different assays such as DPPH, ABTS+, and phospholipid peroxidation assay [28]. Antioxidant properties of M. arvensis and M. × piperita were exerted by various phytochemicals present in different tissues are listed in Table 2. Numerous research studies support the presence of free radical scavenging properties of M. arvensis and M. × piperita, however, in order to proceed forward, studies unveiling the metabolite specific antioxidant mechanisms needs to be established. Further, molecular analysis of metabolic pathways responsible for the synthesis of potential antioxidants in both species will aid in the metabolic engineering of vital phytochemicals with antioxidant potentials. Moreover, a proper characterization of antioxidant compounds and precise extraction approaches needs to be devised for the holistic utilization of the Mentha for large-scale production of antioxidant compounds.

5. Anti-Inflammatory Activities of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

In general, inflammation is a defense response to injury or infection to remove exogenous substances and facilitate self-healing. Inflammatory responses are triggered by a cascade of molecular mechanism and one of the main regulations is mediated by mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs)/nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) signaling [66]. For this response, NF-kB is activated by mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Consequently, NF-kB can significantly influence the production of vital pro-inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL-6), and IL-1β [29]. Similarly, inflammatory reactions such as pain, fever, edema, and dysfunction can be mediated by nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling mediator regulated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [67,68]. Essential oils (EOs) of M. arvensis and M. × piperita have been evaluated for their anti-inflammatory activities in both in vivo or in vitro conditions. Recently, Kim et al. [29] reported the anti-inflammatory effects of M. arvensis essential oil in atopic dermatitis which is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. The molecular analysis revealed the essential oils of M. arvensis attenuated the inflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Further, the essential oils also inhibited phosphorylation of P65 and ERK necessary for activation of inflammatory response in NF-kB signaling pathway [29].
Similarly, in animal models, the immune-modulating effects of M. × piperita were evaluated. According to Atta et al. [68], pre-injection of the ethanol extract (200 and 400 mg/kg) of M. × piperita into mice significantly inhibited 49–50% acute inflammation of ear edema induced by topical xylene treatment. In another study, Mogosan et al. [69] identified that essential oils of M. × piperita attenuated the rat paw edema induced by λ-carrageenan. The in vitro anti-inflammatory effect was evaluated by measuring the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, etc., or inflammatory mediators like NO and PGE2 [69]. The EOs of M. × piperita and M. arvensis displayed similar mode of action to induce anti-inflammatory response by affecting the NF-κB signaling pathway. For instance, Sun et al. [68] reported that M. × piperita essential oils effectively ceased NO and PGE2 production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. A similar anti-inflammatory effect of essential oil of M. × piperita was also found in other LPS-stimulated cells, such as porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) [70] and HaCaT cells [29]. Menthol is the fundamental constitute of EOs derived from M. × piperita and M. arvensis, which significantly suppresses the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, LTB4, and thromboxane B2 in LPS-stimulated human monocytes [71,72]. According to Juergens et al. [71], 1,8-cineole extracted from peppermint also possesses the ability to suppress the inflammatory mediating compounds [71]. Based on the above research, it can be conceived that essential oils of M. arvensis and M. × piperita exert repressing effects on cytokines or inflammatory mediators involved in the ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway to provide an anti-inflammatory response (Figure 1). Thus, the essential oils of these mint species can be utilized for the herbal formulations associated with anti-inflammatory medicines.

6. Anti-Bacterial Activity of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

The antibacterial activities of M. × piperita and M. arvensis have been investigated extensively. The extracts can potentially inhibit the growth of various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Table 3). Several reports illustrated the antibacterial activities of these extracts against pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus [30], S. epidermidis [73], Salmonella typhimurium [74], Klebsiella pneumoniae [75], etc. Moreover, studies have also compared the anti-bacterial activity of M. × piperita and M. arvensis, but the results were inconsistent. For instance, Hussain et al. [30] identified that the essential oil of M. arvensis possess better anti-bacterial properties than M. × piperita. For example, the M. arvensis displayed a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 20.3 ± 1.0 µg/mL for Bacillus subtilis, whereas the MIC of 123.4 ± 5.8 µg/mL was observed upon M. piperita treatment [30]. However, to the same strain, Heydari et al. [76] reported a MIC of 10 mg/mL with M. arvensis treatment while the MIC of M. × piperita was reported as 0.1 mg/mL. This disparity in the results can be due to the differences in the chemical components of the extracts, plant materials from different geographical environment, seasonality, maturity of the plant, and the method of oil isolation [75,76,77,78]. In the studies above, higher percent of menthol were found in the essential oils with better antibacterial activities. Menthol, a cyclic monoterpene alcohol, has been confirmed with good antimicrobial activity [79,80,81]. It was identified as the major antimicrobial compound in M. × piperita and M. arvensis oils [30,82]. The anti-bacterial mechanism of menthol has not been clearly elucidated, however it can be hypothesized as membrane-related inhibitory mechanisms [81]. Likewise, studies on the anti-bacterial function of terpenoids also suggested that their site of action was at the phospholipid bilayer, which would modify the membrane permeability and cause leakage of intracellular substances [83].
Further, Shalayel et al. [73] evaluated the anti-bacterial effect of M. × piperita extracted using different reagents, and discovered that the ethyl acetate extract had strongest anti-bacterial effects on the tested pathogens, followed by the chloroform, ethanol, and methanol extracts. On the other hand, Singh et al. [75] reported that ethyl acetate extract of M. × piperita possessed more inhibitory activity, indicating the primary importance of solvent used for extraction in determining the chemical composition. Additionally, Singh et al. [75] identified that the M. × piperita oil is more effective against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacteria. Similarly, Gochev et al. [84] evaluated the antimicrobial activity of Bulgarian peppermint oil and illustrated that peppermint oils are more effective against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria. This might be due to the existence of lipopolysaccharides in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, which could enhance their resistance to antibacterial substances [82]. In addition, M. arvensis leaves displayed strong anti-bacterial effects against multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [85]. The essential oil isolated from the fresh leaves of M. arvensis ceased the growth of five bacterial strains such as S. aureus, B. subtilis, S. pyogenes, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, respectively [86,87]. The anti-bacterial activity of M. × piperita and M. arvensis is due to the occurrence of mixture of phytochemicals particularly the essential oil components. In addition, based on the observed results, it can be assumed that the synergistic action of diverse phytochemicals in varying quantities present in the extracts could lead to the difference in the bactericidal activity of the extracts. However, the similar combinatorial activity of the phytochemical can also lead to lower effects against different bacterial strains. Therefore, future studies should be designed to delineate the primary constituent responsible for the anti-bacterial activity along with the molecular mechanism of action. Further, research on pathogen specific interaction anti-bacterial components in mints will facilitate its industrial and medicinal application.
Table 3. Anti-bacterial activity of M. × piperita and M. arvensis.
Table 3. Anti-bacterial activity of M. × piperita and M. arvensis.
SpeciesSample Extract or Essential OilOrigin of Bacterial CultureBacteriaz MIC (mg/mL)References
M. × piperitaLeaf extractPure culturesStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 10707
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
12.0
12.3
31.04
[30]
M. arvensisLeaf extractPure culturesStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 10707
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
3.0.5
2.03
33.03
[30]
M. × piperitaEssential oilPure culturesStaphylococcus aureus ATCC 9144
Enterococcus faecalis CIP 103907
Listeria monocytogenes CRBIP 13.134
Enterobacter aerogenes CIP 104725
Escherichia coli CIP 105182
Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRBIP 19.249
Salmonella enterica CIP 105150
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 13311
Shigella dysenteria CIP 54.51
8.3
8.3
10
>80
40
>80
8.3
13.3
5.8
[88]
M. × piperitaEssential oilPure culturesEscherichia coli αDH5
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Bacillus subtilis
Staphylococcus aureus
1.13
1.13
2.25
2.25
1.13
1.13
[89]
M. × piperitaEssential oilClinical oral isolatesStaphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pyogenes IBR S004
Streptococcus mutans IBR S001
Lactobacillus acidophilus IBR L001
Streptococcus salivarius IBR S006
Streptococcus sanguinis IBR S002
Enterococcus faecalis IBR E001
62.67
63.00
60.33
27.00
34.66
28.66
23.86
[90]
M. × piperitaExtract of aerial partClinical isolates from nosocomial patientsStaphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Streptococcus pyogenes
Enterococcus faecalis
Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Seratia marcescens
Acinetobacter baumannii
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
5.00
2.50
1.25
2.50
5.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
40.00
40.00
[73]
M. × piperitaEssential oilPure culturesStaphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus aureus
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus cereus
2.00
10.00
0.10
0.08
[76]
M. arvensisEssential oilPure culturesStaphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus aureus
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus cereus
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
[76]
M. × piperitaEssential oilPure culturesListeria monocytogenes PTCC 1163
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 13311
12.50
25.00
[74]
M. arvensisEssential oilClinical isolates from vaginal swabsStreptococcus agalactiae ATCC 13813
Lactobacillus spp.
1.80
1.80
[91]
z MIC = Minimum inhibitory concentration.

7. Antifungal Activity of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

The antifungal activities of M. arvensis and M. × piperita have been evidenced in various reports and most of the effects are due to the occurrence of essential oils. Candida species are opportunistic fungal pathogens to humans. Candidiasis caused by the infection of Candida species has a wide spectrum, varying from mild infection of skin or mucous membrane to severe invasion of organs [92]. Studies on the anti-fungal activities showed that the essential oils of M. × piperita and M. arvensis could inhibit the growth of Candida species and prevent the formation of biofilm [93,94,95,96]. The antifungal activity of M. × piperita essential oil was comparable to that of amphotericin-B [93]. The formation of biofilm is the survival mode of Candida species, which can also contribute to its pathogenesis, and drug resistance. According to Saharkhiz et al. [95], the essential oil of M. × piperita inhibited the biofilm formation of Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis at concentrations up to 2 μL/mL. The antifungal mechanism of M. × piperita essential oil involves downregulation of the expression of some potential genes, such as secreted aspartyl proteinases (SAP 1, 2, 3, 9, 10) and hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) [93]. The essential oil of M. × piperita is also reported to be effective in inhibiting the growth of dermatophytes. The essential oils of M. × piperita significantly ceased the growth of pathogenic fungi belonging to dermatophytes such as Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Microsporum canis, and M. gypseum [97,98,99]. The antimycotic effect of M. × piperita essential oil against Malassezia pachydermatis, a common cause of dermatitis in dogs were illustrated by Nardoni et al. [100]. Similarly, the antifungal activities of M. × piperita against various plant pathogens have been widely studied. For instance, Rachitha et al. [101] discovered that M. × piperita essential oils showed inhibitory activity against Fusarium sporotrichioides, a filamentous fungi that contaminate corn and corn-based products. The application of M. × piperita essential oil against the postharvest fungi Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia fructicola, Penicillium expansum, and Aspergillus niger identified to be effective against all tested fungi [102]. The inhibitory effect of M. × piperita essential oil against fungal pathogens of vegetables and mushrooms, including Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora parasitica, Pythium aphanidermatum, Alternaria brassicae, Cladobotryum mycophilum, and Trichoderma aggressivum f.sp. europaeum were reported by Diánez et al. [103].
The antifungal property of M. arvensis essential oils enabled them to be applied in the field of food preservation. The augmentation of M. arvensis essential oil into gelatin edible coatings generated transparent film to prevent the infection of Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifera in food and vegetable [104]. The ethanolic extracts of M. arvensis were assayed for antifungal activity against the strains of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei, and a potentiation effect was observed by Santos et al. [96]. The fungicidal activity for menthe, a volatile oil and principal constituent, has been established against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium moniliforme. It was also evaluated for antimycotic efficacy against F. oxysporum and T. mentagrophytes [105]. Till date, the mechanism of antifungal action by the essential oils are not revealed however earlier researches suggested that the mechanism can be due to the distortion of plasma membrane permeability of the fungus [106]. This result in the alteration of ion transport, respiration, and other vital metabolism of fungi. Overall, the above reports suggested efficient antifungal activity of M. arvensis and M. × piperita essential oils primarily mediated by alteration of plasma membrane permeability of the fungi as one of the modes of action. However, the occurrence of single or multiple metabolites with antifungal activity in Mentha require to be investigated. Further, existence of other possible mode of actions exerted by the bioactive phytochemicals in Mentha against pathogenic fungi needs to be elucidated.

8. Anticancer Activities of M. arvensis and M. × piperita

Cancer is an increasingly serious health problem worldwide and has replaced heart disease as the leading cause of death worldwide [107]. Although the field of oncology medicine has made great progress in the present era, there are still several issues that need to be solved to improve cancer treatment. In the past decade, much research has focused on finding new therapies to reduce side effects caused by modern medicine [108]. Novel drug molecules with high efficiency, efficacy, less side effects and low environmental impact are desirable for the cancer treatment. To date, the search for the effective drug against most cancers are still in progress. Plant-based bioactive compounds provide opportunities for innovation in drug discovery. Several phytochemicals play an important role in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Among many phytochemicals with diverse structures, essential oils have attracted much attention due to their rich biological activities [109]. M. arvensis and M.× piperita also play important roles in the field of anticancer drug development as major Mentha oil raw materials. Nano-emulsion of M. arvensis essential oil demonstrated high induction effect on early and middle apoptosis in anaplastic/aggressive thyroid cancer cells [110]. Likewise, methanol extract and essential oil from six different M. × piperita plants were effective against Vero, Hela, and Hep2 cancer cell lines [83]. In detail, the methanol extract has higher cytotoxic activities than essential oil for Vero and Hela whereas, the effect was reversed in Hep2 cancer cell line. These results indicated that there are differences in the effective components or mode of action in the extracts for cytotoxic activity on different types of cancer cells [111]. According to Jain et al. [112], the M. × piperita extracts isolated with different organic solvents or water had different cytotoxic activity against six common human cancer cells. The results suggested that chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts induced significant dose-dependent and time-dependent anticancer activity, leading to G1 cell cycle arrest and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, perturbation of oxidative balance, up-regulation of Bax genes, increased expression of p53 and P21, and induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine responses [112]. In most cases tumor formation is frequently accompanied by the development of new blood vessels. The extract of M. arvensis could facilitate the prevention of cancer by inhibiting the generation of blood vessels which was evidenced through chick chorioallantoic membrane assay [113]. In another study, M. × piperita extract not only restrained skin papilloma by influencing the activation/detoxification of the carcinogen but also improved cellular resistance to radiation through enhancing the antioxidant mechanism [114]. Likewise, M. arvensis extract suppressed the growth and induced apoptosis against HepG2 cell lines which was observed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [47]. Moreover, the M. arvensis also displayed anti-cancer activity against eight human cancer cells from six different origins such as breast, colon, prostate, lung, leukemia, and glioblastoma [47]. Further, green silver nanoparticles synthesized from M. arvensis displayed a promising role against the breast cancer cell line with less toxic to normal cells, non-mutagenic, mediated caspase 9-dependent apoptosis in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells [115]. An essential oil which contains menthol, menthone has anticancer property in treating anaplastic thyroid cancer cells by nanoemulsion method [110]. According to Weecharangsan et al. [116], essential oils of M. arvensis showed cytotoxic activity with IC50 value of 142.0 ± 92.2 and 243.3 ± 151.1 μg/mL against KB cells and with IC50 value of 178.4 ± 92.1 and 779.4 ± 673.3 μg/mL against HeLa cells. Moreover, the M. arvensis extract contains Rosmarinic acid(Ra), a natural phenolic compound which induced dose-dependent cell death in cultured HepG2 cells and mRNA expression analysis confirmed the down regulation of anti-apoptotic gene Bcl2 with upregulation of proapoptotic genes like Bax and ERK2 [117]. Similar to other aromatic herb extracts, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, oxygenated monoterpenes, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, and phenolics, among others, play key roles in the anticancer mechanism of mint extract. The main mechanism of chemoprophylaxis of these compounds is protection against oxidation, mutation and proliferation, enhancement of immune function and monitoring, enzyme induction and improvement of detoxification ability, regulation of multidrug resistance, and synergistic action. However, more research on the identification of specific components and their mechanism of action needs to be performed to promote the treatment of cancer by natural products such as mint extracts in the future.

9. Extracts of M. arvensis and M. × piperita in Radiation Therapy

Radiotherapy is a vital method for the treatment of malignant tumors. About 50% of cancer patients need radiation therapy in the course of cancer treatment, and about 40% of cancers can be suppressed with radiation [118]. At present, targeted radiations towards cancerous cells without affecting the normal cells is an immensely researched area to provide effective anti-cancer treatment [119]. In the chemical radiation therapy, sensitizers or protectors possess the ability to guard the normal cells to an extent from the damages caused by radiations [120]. However, the radiation protectors discovered earlier, such as 2-(3-aminopropylamino) ethylsulphanyl phosphonic acid (WR-2721), are toxic to cells at the optimal protective concentration [121]. Therefore, research has been focused on the identification of effective plant/natural-product-based radiation protectors for cancer treatments. One of the promising alternates is the extract of M. arvensis. According to Jagetia and Baliga [122], mice fed with different doses of M. arvensis extract had significantly decreased the side effects of gamma radiations in comparison with the control. The results showed that the optimal protection was provided by feeding 10 mg/kg M. arvensis extract, which was much lower than the toxic dose (1000 mg/kg). Similarly, radiation protection function was also identified in M. × piperita [123,124,125]. Under in vivo conditions in the mice model, M. × piperita extract significantly improved serum alkaline phosphatase and declined serum acid phosphatase activities. Alkaline and acid phosphatase plays an important role in the maintenance of cell permeability [126,127,128]. These reports demonstrated that M. × piperita alleviates the damages to animal cell membranes caused by radiation to some extent. Likewise, M. × piperita extract aided in the recovery of intestinal mucosa [124], bone marrow [125], and testicles [129] from radiation damages in mice. This illustrates that Mentha extract consists of promising phytochemicals which can prevent the cellular damages caused by radiations. It is apparent from the above studies that the extracts of M. arvensis and M. × piperita can act as vital components for recovery from damages caused by radiations but the exact rationale behind the anti-radiation property needs to be identified.

10. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Versatile nutraceutical potentials of M. arvensis and M. × piperita have been evidenced from various studies denoting their enormous pharmaceutical importance, most of which has been attributed to its antioxidant, anti-microbial, anti-cancerous, and anti-inflammatory properties. The administration of M. arvensis and M. × piperita under various pathological conditions facilitate the recovery of diseases and aids in the prevention of detrimental ailments. Particularly, the occurrence of volatile essential oils in leaves, stems, and roots consists of the disease combating potentials which can be utilized for discovery of novel drugs with higher efficacy and lesser side effects. Even though mint consists of numerous economic and health benefits, to date, there is a scarcity of knowledge in the aspects of quality and quantity of the phytochemicals and choice of genotypes to be used as raw materials for large-scale industrial usage. In addition, the presence of excessive flavor or aroma in mint can negatively influence the organoleptic traits and reduce the consumer quality of the products. Therefore, research needs to address the abovementioned shortcomings to enhance the elite varieties of mint with optimal phytochemicals. Further, clinical trials with Mentha for diverse disorders should be initiated to validate the potential of the natural herbal medicines in human. Additionally, appropriate channel of knowledge on the method of consumption, elucidation of molecular mechanism behind the antioxidant, anti-cancer, and anti-microbicidal effects of M. arvensis and M. × piperita needs to be devised. In addition, application of current omics based approaches to unveil the metabolic pathways and candidate genes involved in the essential oil biosynthesis will facilitate the utilization of these Mentha species in large-scale in food and pharmaceutical fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and H.W.; investigation, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W., S.K., V.J. and D.S.; writing—review and editing, P.S. and A.M.; supervision, A.M.; funding acquisition, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Abinaya Manivannan, DST-INSPIRE faculty (DST/INSPIRE/04/2021/003731) acknowledges the support from Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Süntar, I. Importance of ethnopharmacological studies in drug discovery: Role of medicinal plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hassan, B. Medicinal plants (importance and uses). Pharm. Anal. Acta. 2012, 3, e139. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, Y.; Kong, D.; Fu, Y.; Sussman, M.R.; Wu, H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hosseinzadeh, S.; Jafarikukhdan, A.; Hosseini, A.; Armand, R. The Application of Medicinal Plants in Traditional and Modern Medicine: A Review of Thymus vulgaris. Int. J. Clin. Med. 2015, 6, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alami, M.M.; Ouyang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, S.; Yang, G.; Mei, Z.; Wang, X. The Current Developments in Medicinal Plant Genomics Enabled the Diversification of Secondary Metabolites’ Biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mondal, M.; Chandra, I. Organ specific phytochemical changes and antioxidant activities of in vivo and in vitro grown Gloriosa superba L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 152, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tucker, A.O. Mentha: Economic uses. In Mint: The Genus Mentha, 1st ed.; Lawrence, B.M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 519–528. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ćavar Zeljković, S.; Šišková, J.; Komzáková, K.; De Diego, N.; Kaffková, K.; Tarkowski, P. Phenolic Compounds and Biological Activity of Selected Mentha Species. Plants 2021, 10, 550. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arzani, A.; Zeinali, H.; Razmjo, K. Iron and magnesium concentrations of mint accessions (Mentha spp.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 323–329. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Dietary Chinese Herbs, 1st ed.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2015; pp. 631–636. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mahendran, G.; Rahman, L. Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological updates on Peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.)—A review. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2088–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Balakrishnan, A. Therapeutic uses of peppermint—A review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 7, 474–476. [Google Scholar]
  13. McKay, D.L.; Blumberg, J.B. A review of the bioactivity and potential health benefits of peppermint tea (Mentha piperita L.). Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 619–633. [Google Scholar]
  14. Spirling, L.I.; Daniels, I.R. Botanical perspectives on health peppermint: More than just an after-dinner mint. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health. 2001, 121, 62–63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Beigi, M.; Torki-Harchegani, M.; Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A. Quantity and chemical composition of essential oil of peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.) leaves under different drying methods. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 12, 267–276. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mahboubi, M.; Kazempour, N. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) Essential oil. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2014, 36, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sivropoulou, A. Antimicrobial activity of mint essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 2384–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsai, M.; Wu, C.T.; Lin, T.F.; Lin, W.; Huang, Y.C.; Yang, C.H. Chemical Composition and Biological Properties of Essential Oils of Two Mint Species. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 12, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jayanthy, G.; Subramanian, S. Extraction, Isolation and Characterization of Rosmarinic Acid, a Major Polyphenol in Non-volatile Constituent of Mint Leaves. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2013, 6, 1160–1165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, L.-L.; Xu, J.-J.; Zhong, K.-R.; Shang, Z.-P.; Wang, F.; Wang, R.-F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Liu, B. Analysis of Non-Volatile Chemical Constituents of Menthae Haplocalycis Herba by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2017, 22, 1756. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Grulova, D.; De Martino, L.; Mancini, E.; Salamon, I.; De Feo, V. Seasonal variability of the main components in essential oil of Mentha × piperita L. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 621–627. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalemba, D.; Synowiec, A. Agrobiological interactions of essential oils of two menthol mints: Mentha piperita and Mentha arvensis. Molecules 2019, 25, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bacon, F.J. The botanical origin of American peppermint—Mentha piperita L. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 1928, 17, 1094–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, A.; Raina, V.; Naqvi, A.; Patra, N.; Kumar, B.; Ram, P.; Khanuja, S. Essential oil composition and chemoarrays of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L. f. piperascens Malinvaud ex. Holmes) cultivars. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Walasek, M. Preparative separation of menthol and pulegone from peppermint oil (Mentha piperita L.) by high-performance counter-current chromatography. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
  26. Akram, M.; Uzair, M.; Malik, N.S.; Mahmood, A.; Asif, H.M. Mentha arvensis Linn.: A review article. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4499–4503. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, A.; Shukla, R.; Singh, P.; Singh, A.K.; Dubey, N.K. Use of essential oil from Mentha arvensis L. to control storage moulds and insects in stored chickpea. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 89, 2643–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biswas, N.N.; Saha, S.; Ali, M.K. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and analgesic activities of ethanolic extract of Mentha arvensis L. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 792–797. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, S.Y.; Han, S.D.; Kim, M.; Mony, T.J.; Lee, E.S.; Kim, K.M.; Choi, S.H.; Hong, S.H.; Choi, J.W.; Park, S.J. Mentha arvensis Essential Oil Exerts Anti-Inflammatory in LPS-Stimulated Inflammatory Responses via Inhibition of ERK/NF-κB Signaling Pathway and Anti-Atopic Dermatitis-like Effects in 2,4-Dinitrochlorobezene-Induced BALB/c Mice. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hussain, A.I.; Anwar, F.; Nigam, P.S.; Ashraf, M.; Gilani, A.H. Seasonal variation in content, chemical composition and antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of essential oils from four Mentha species. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gholamipourfard, K.; Salehi, M.; Banchio, E. Review: Mentha piperita phytochemicals in agriculture, food industry and medicine: Features and applications. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 141, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmadi, H.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Emrahi, R.; Javanmard, A.; Rasouli, F.; Maggi, F.; Kumar, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Introducing Three New Fruit-Scented Mints to Farmlands: Insights on Drug Yield, Essential-Oil Quality, and Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, H.; Ren, S.; Yang, H.; Tang, S.; Guo, C.; Liu, M.; Tao, Q.; Ming, T.; Xu, H. Peppermint essential oil: Its phytochemistry, biological activity, pharmacological effect and application. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 154, 113559. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sahandi, M.S.; Mehrafarin, A.; Khalighi-Sigaroodi, F.; Sharifi, M.; Badi, H.N. Review on anatomical, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). J. Med. Plants 2018, 17, 16–33. [Google Scholar]
  35. Farnaz, M.; Shahzad, H.; Alia, S.; Ghazala, P.; Amina, W.; Shazia, S.; Rafique, A.C.; Rashid, M.; Humayun, R.; Muhammad, I.; et al. Phyto-chemical analysis, anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory activity of Mentha arvensis in animals. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 6, 613–619. [Google Scholar]
  36. Thawkar, B.S. Phytochemical and pharmacological review of Mentha arvensis. Int. J. Green Pharm. 2016, 10, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mahishi, P.; Srinivasa, B.H.; Shivanna, M.B. Medicinal plant wealth of local communities in some villages in Shimoga District of Karnataka,India. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 98, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kumar, A.; Chattopadhyay, S. DNA damage protecting activity and antioxidant potential of pudina extract. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oinonen, P.P.; Jokela, J.K.; Hatakka, A.I.; Vuorela, P.M. Linarin, a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor from Mentha arvensis. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 429–434. [Google Scholar]
  40. Trevisan, S.C.C.; Menezes, A.P.P.; Barbalho, S.M.; Guiguer, É.L. Properties of mentha piperita: A brief review. World J. Pharm. Med. Res. 2017, 3, 309–313. [Google Scholar]
  41. Badal, R.M.; Badal, D.; Badal, P.; Khare, A.; Shrivastava, J.; Kumare, V. Pharmacological Action of Mentha piperita on Lipid Profile in Fructose-Fed Rats. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2011, 10, 843–848. [Google Scholar]
  42. Patil, S.R.; Patial, R.S.; Godghate, A.G. Mentha piperita Linn: Phytochemical, antibacterial and dipterian adulticidal approach. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 352–355. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dorman, H.J.; Koşar, M.; Başer, K.H.; Hiltunen, R. Phenolic profile and antioxidant evaluation of Mentha × piperita L. (peppermint) extracts. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Uribe, E.; Marín, D.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Quispe-Fuentes, I.; Rodríguez, A. Assessment of vacuum-dried peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) as a source of natural antioxidants. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Qamar, N.; Pandey, M.; Vasudevan, M.; Kumar, A.; Shasany, A.K. Glandular trichome specificity of menthol biosynthesis pathway gene promoters from Mentha × piperita. Planta. 2022, 256, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Brahmi, F.; Khodir, M.; Mohamed, C.; Pierre, D. Chemical composition and biological activities of Mentha species. In Aromatic and Medicinal Plants-Back to Nature, 1st ed.; EI-Shemy, H.A., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017; Volume 10, pp. 47–79. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tafrihi, M.; Imran, M.; Tufail, T.; Gondal, T.A.; Caruso, G.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, R.; Atanassova, M.; Atanassov, L.; Valere Tsouh Fokou, P.; et al. The wonderful activities of the genus Mentha: Not only antioxidant properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Saqib, S.; Ullah, F.; Naeem, M.; Younas, M.; Ayaz, A.; Ali, S.; Zaman, W. Mentha: Nutritional and Health Attributes to Treat Various Ailments Including Cardiovascular Diseases. Molecules 2022, 27, 6728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Anwar, F.; Abbas, A.; Mehmood, T.; Gilani, A.H.; Rehman, N.U. Mentha: A genus rich in vital nutra-pharmaceuticals—A review. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2548–2570. [Google Scholar]
  50. Eftekhari, A.; Khusro, A.; Ahmadian, E.; Dizaj, S.M.; Hasanzadeh, A.; Cucchiarini, M. Phytochemical and nutra-pharmaceutical attributes of Mentha spp.: A comprehensive review. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103106. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A.; Kubat-Sikorska, A. Chemical diversity of mint essential oils and their significance for aromatherapy. Arch. Physiother. Glob. Res. 2018, 22, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lin, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, K.; Yu, G.; Liu, C.; Su, C.; Yi, F. Study on the Effect of Mentha × piperita L. Essential Oil on Electroencephalography upon Stimulation with Different Visual Effects. Molecules 2022, 27, 4059. [Google Scholar]
  53. Horky, P.; Skalickova, S.; Smerkova, K.; Skladanka, J. Essential oils as a feed additives: Pharmacokinetics and potential toxicity in monogastric animals. Animals 2019, 9, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Masouri, L.; Bagherzadeh-Kasmani, F.; Mehri, M.; Rokouei, M.; Masouri, B. Mentha piperita as a promising feed additive used to protect liver, bone, and meat of Japanese quail against aflatoxin B1. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 254. [Google Scholar]
  55. Abdel-Wareth, A.A.A.; Lohakare, J.D. Effect of dietary supplementation of peppermint on performance, egg quality, and serum metabolic profile of Hy-Line Brown hens during the late laying period. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 197, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Farnad, N.; Heidari, R.; Aslanipour, B. Phenolic composition and comparison of antioxidant activity of alcoholic extracts of Peppermint (Mentha piperita). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2014, 8, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Anwar, F.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Najeeb-ur-Rehman; Adam, E.; Gilani, A. Chemo-geographical Variations in the Composition of Volatiles and the Biological Attributes of Mentha longifolia (L.) Essential Oils from Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 13, 408–424. [Google Scholar]
  58. Nickavar, B.; Alinaghi, A.; Kamalinejad, M. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Properties of Five Mentha Species. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2008, 7, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hamad Al-Mijalli, S.; Elsharkawy, E.; Abdallah, E.; Hamed, M.; El Omari, N.; Mahmud, S.; Alshahrani, M.; Naceiri Mrabti, H.; Bouyahya, A. Determination of Volatile Compounds of Mentha piperita and Lavandula multifida and Investigation of Their Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antidiabetic Properties. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 9306251. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mimica-Dukic, N.; Bozin, B. Mentha L. species (Lamiaceae) as promising sources of bioactive secondary metabolites. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 3141–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kumar, A.; Khajuria, V.; Aggarwal, S. Secondary metabolites of Mentha arvensis and their biological activities. Anal. Chem. Lett. 2012, 2, 373–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Phatak, S.V.; Heble, M.R. Organogenesis and terpenoid synthesis in Mentha arvensis. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Venkatesha, K.T.; Padalia, R.; Singh, V.R.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Chauhan, A. Correlation and path-analysis for morpho-economic traits and chemical constituents of essential oil in Corn mint (Mentha arvensis L.) accessions. Arab. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2020, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bittner Fialová, S.; Kurin, E.; Trajčíková, E.; Jánošová, L.; Šušaníková, I.; Tekeľová, D.; Nagy, M.; Mučaji, P. Mentha Rhizomes as an Alternative Source of Natural Antioxidants. Molecules 2020, 25, 200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Mahdavikia, F.; Saharkhiz, M.J. Phytotoxic activity of essential oil and water extract of peppermint (Mentha × piperita L. CV. Mitcham). J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2015, 2, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Won, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Yun, K.J.; Lee, J.H.; Back, N.I.; Chung, H.G.; Chung, S.A.; Jeong, T.S.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, K.T. Gigantol isolated from the whole plants of Cymbidium goeringii inhibits the LPS-induced iNOS and COX-2 expression via NF-kappaB inactivation in RAW 264.7 macrophages cells. Planta Med. 2006, 72, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zamora, R.; Vodovotz, Y.; Billiar, T.R. Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and Inflammatory Diseases. Mol. Med. 2000, 6, 347–373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Atta, A.H.; Alkofahi, A. Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of some Jordanian medicinal plant extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 2, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hejna, M.; Kovanda, L.; Rossi, L.; Liu, Y. Mint Oils: In Vitro Ability to Perform Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities and to Enhance Intestinal Barrier Integrity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1004. [Google Scholar]
  71. Juergens, U.R.; Stöber, M.; Vetter, H. The anti-inflammatory activity of L-menthol compared to mint oil in human monocytes in vitro: A novel perspective for its therapeutic use in inflammatory diseases. Eur. J. Med. Res. 1998, 3, 539–545. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hilfiger, L.; Triaux, Z.; Marcic, C.; Héberlé, E.; Emhemmed, F.; Darbon, P.; Marchioni, E.; Petitjean, H.; Charlet, A. Anti-Hyperalgesic Properties of Menthol and Pulegone. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shalayel, M.H.F.; Asaad, A.M.; Qureshi, M.A.; Elhussein, A.B. Anti-bacterial activity of peppermint (Mentha piperita) extracts against some emerging multi-drug resistant human bacterial pathogens. J. Herb. Med. 2017, 7, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  74. Raeisi, M.; Hashemi, M.; Ansarian, E.; Hejazi, J.; Hassanzadazar, H.; Daneshamooz, S.; Jannat, B.; Aminzare, M. Antibacterial Effect of Mentha piperita Essential Oil Against Foodborne Pathogens in Minced Meat During Storage at Abuse Refrigeration Temperature. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019, 7, 720–726. [Google Scholar]
  75. Singh, R.; Shushni, M.; Belkheir, A. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Mentha piperita L. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 322–328. [Google Scholar]
  76. Heydari, M.; Zanfardino, A.; Taleei, A.; Bushehri, A.A.S.; Hadian, J.; Maresca, V.; Sorbo, S.; Napoli, M.D.; Varcamonti, M.; Basile, A.; et al. Effect of Heat Stress on Yield, Monoterpene Content and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils of Mentha × piperita var. Mitcham and Mentha arvensis var. piperascens. Molecules 2018, 23, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bui-Phuc, T.; Nhu-Trang, T.T.; Cong-Hau, N. Comparison of chemical composition of essential oils obtained by hydro-distillation and microwave-assisted extraction of Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.) grown in Vietnam. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 991, 012039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ibrahim, M.; Ankwai, G.; Gungshik, J.; Taave, P. Comparative extraction of essential oils of Mentha piperita (mint) by steam distillation and enfleurage. Niger. J. Chem. Res. 2022, 26, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Osawa, K.; Saeki, T.; Yasuda, H.; Hamashima, H.; Sasatsu, M.; Arai, T. The antibacterial activities of peppermint oil and green tea polyphenols, alone and in combination, against Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coil. Biocontrol Sci. 1999, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  80. Pattnaik, S.; Subramanyam, V.R.; Bapaji, M.; Kole, C.R. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of aromatic constituents of essential oils. Microbios 1997, 89, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Trombetta, D.; Castelli, F.; Sarpietro, M.G.; Venuti, V.; Cristani, M.; Daniele, C.; Saija, A.; Mazzanti, G.; Bisignano, G. Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2474–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Işcan, G.; Kirimer, N.; Kürkcüoğlu, M.; Başer, K.H.; Demirci, F. Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3943–3946. [Google Scholar]
  83. Turgeon, T.; Wright, L. Mint. The Genus Mentha. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1834. [Google Scholar]
  84. Gochev, V.; Stoyanova, A.; Girova, T.; Atanasova, T. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Bulgarian peppermint oils. Bulg. Sci. Pap. 2008, 36, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, L.; Xu, S.-G.; Liang, W.; Mei, J.; Di, Y.-Y.; Lan, H.-H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.-W.; Luo, Y.-Y.; Wang, H.-Z. Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action of Mentha arvensis Ethanol Extract against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 14, 2099. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bibi, S.; Ali, S.; Shahidin; Ullah, I.; Rauf, A.; Arif, D.; Umar, M.; Khan, A.S.; Hussain, M.; Ghani, A.; et al. Chemical composition and anti-microbial analysis of Mentha arvensis L. and Thymus linearis Benth. essential oils of leaves. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 26, 2893–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bokhari, N.; Perveen, K.; Al Khulaifi, M.; Kumar, A.; Siddiqui, I. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oil of Mentha arvensis Linn. Leaves. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2016, 19, 907–915. [Google Scholar]
  88. Bassolé, I.H.N.; Lamien-Meda, A.; Bayala, B.; Tirogo, S.; Franz, C.; Novak, J.; Nebié, R.C.; Dicko, M.H. Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Lippia multiflora Moldenke, Mentha × piperita L. and Ocimum basilicum L. Essential Oils and Their Major Monoterpene Alcohols Alone and in Combination. Molecules 2010, 15, 7825–7839. [Google Scholar]
  89. Tyagi, A.K.; Malik, A. Antimicrobial potential and chemical composition of Mentha piperita oil in liquid and vapour phase against food spoiling microorganisms. Food Control 2011, 22, 1707–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nikolić, M.; Jovanović, K.K.; Marković, T.; Marković, D.; Gligorijević, N.; Radulović, S.; Soković, M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic properties of five Lamiaceae essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 61, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Iseppi, R.; Tardugno, R.; Brighenti, V.; Benvenuti, S.; Sabia, C.; Pellati, F.; Messi, P. Phytochemical Composition and In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils from the Lamiaceae Family against Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans Biofilms. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Coutinho, H.D. Factors influencing the virulence of Candida spp. West Indian Med. J. 2009, 58, 160–163. [Google Scholar]
  93. Benzaid, C.; Belmadani, A.; Djeribi, R.; Rouabhia, M. The Effects of Mentha × piperita Essential Oil on C. albicans Growth, Transition, Biofilm Formation, and the Expression of Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases Genes. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 10. [Google Scholar]
  94. Jayan, L.; Priyadharsini, N.; Ramya, R.; Rajkumar, K. Evaluation of antifungal activity of mint, pomegranate and coriander on fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2020, 24, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Saharkhiz, M.J.; Motamedi, M.; Zomorodian, K.; Pakshir, K.; Hemyari, K.K. Chemical Composition, Antifungal and Antibiofilm Activities of the Essential Oil of Mentha piperita L. ISRN Pharm. 2012, 2012, 718645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Santos, K.K.; Matias, E.F.; Souza, C.E.; Tintino, S.R.; Braga, M.F.; Guedes, G.M.; Nogueira, L.F.; Morais, E.C.; Costa, J.G.; Menezes, I.R.; et al. Anti-Candida activity of Mentha arvensis and Turnera ulmifolia. J. Med. Food 2012, 15, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Ibrahim, S.Y.; El-Salam, M.A. Anti-dermatophyte efficacy and environmental safety of some essential oils commercial and in vitro extracted pure and combined against four keratinophilic pathogenic fungi. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2015, 20, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Tullio, V.; Roana, J.; Scalas, D.; Mandras, N. Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of Mentha × piperita (Lamiaceae) of Pancalieri (Turin, Italy) Essential Oil and Its Synergistic Interaction with Azoles. Molecules 2019, 24, 3148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Scalas, D.; Roana, J.; Mandras, N.; Banche, G.; Allizond, V.; Cuffini, A.; Tullio, V. Mentha × piperita (Huds)(Lamiaceae) essential oil of Pancalieri (Turin, Italy): Preliminary evaluation of the antifungal activity and synergistic interaction with antifungal drugs. Natural 2015, 147, 61–62. [Google Scholar]
  100. Nardoni, S.; Mugnaini, L.; Pistelli, L.; Leonardi, M.; Sanna, V.; Perrucci, S.; Pisseri, F.; Mancianti, F. Clinical and mycological evaluation of an herbal antifungal formulation in canine Malassezia dermatitis. J. Mycol. Med. 2014, 24, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  101. Rachitha, P.; Krupashree, K.; Jayashree, G.V.; Gopalan, N.; Khanum, F. Growth Inhibition and Morphological Alteration of Fusarium sporotrichioides by Mentha piperita Essential Oil. Pharmacogn. Res. 2017, 9, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  102. Camele, I.; Gruľová, D.; Elshafie, H.S. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Properties of Mentha × piperita cv. ‘Kristinka’ Essential Oil. Plants 2021, 10, 1567. [Google Scholar]
  103. Diánez, F.; Santos, M.; Parra, C.; Navarro, M.J.; Blanco, R.; Gea, F.J. Screening of antifungal activity of 12 essential oils against eight pathogenic fungi of vegetables and mushroom. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 400–410. [Google Scholar]
  104. Scartazzini, L.; Tosati, J.V.; Cortez, D.H.C.; Rossi, M.J.; Flôres, S.H.; Hubinger, M.D.; Di Luccio, M.; Monteiro, A.R. Gelatin edible coatings with mint essential oil (Mentha arvensis): Film characterization and antifungal properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4045–4056. [Google Scholar]
  105. Pandey, A.K.; Rai, M.K.; Acharya, D. Chemical Composition and Antimycotic Activity of the Essential Oils of Corn Mint (Mentha arvensis) and Lemon Grass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) Against Human Pathogenic Fungi. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kaur, H.; Tandon, R.; Kalia, A.; Maini, C. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oils from aerial parts of Mentha piperita and Mentha arvensis. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 5, 767–773. [Google Scholar]
  107. Stringhini, S.; Guessous, I. The Shift From Heart Disease to Cancer as the Leading Cause of Death in High-Income Countries: A Social Epidemiology Perspective. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 877–878. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Pucci, C.; Martinelli, C.; Ciofani, G. Innovative approaches for cancer treatment: Current perspectives and new challenges. Ecancermedicalscience 2019, 13, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bhalla, Y.; Gupta, V.K.; Jaitak, V. Anticancer activity of essential oils: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 3643–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Nirmala, M.J.; Durai, L.; Anusha, G.S.; Nagarajan, R. Nanoemulsion of Mentha arvensis Essential Oil as an Anticancer Agent in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cells and as an Antibacterial Agent in Staphylococcus aureus. BioNanoScience 2021, 11, 1017–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rahimifard, N.; Haji, M.H.; Hedayati, M.; Bagheri, O.; Pishehvar, H.; Ajani, Y. Cytotoxic effects of essential oils and extracts of some Mentha species on Vero, Hela and Hep2 cell lines. J. Med. Plants 2010, 9, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  112. Jain, D.; Pathak, N.; Khan, S.; Raghuram, G.V.; Bhargava, A.; Samarth, R.; Mishra, P.K. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and anticarcinogenic potential of Mentha leaf extracts. Int. J. Toxicol. 2011, 30, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sonawane, H.; Shinde, A.; Jadhav, J. Evaluation of anti-angiogenic potential of Mentha arvensis Linn. Leaf extracts using chorioallantoic membrane assay. World J. Pharm. Res. 2016, 5, 677–689. [Google Scholar]
  114. Kumar, A.; Samarth, R.M.; Yasmeen, S.; Sharma, A.; Sugahara, T.; Terado, T.; Kimura, H. Anticancer and radioprotective potentials of Mentha piperita. Biofactors 2004, 22, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  115. Banerjee, P.P.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Harsha, S.N.; Policegoudra, R.S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Mentha arvensis (Linn.)-mediated green silver nanoparticles trigger caspase 9-dependent cell death in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Breast Cancer 2017, 9, 265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Weecharangsan, W.; Sithithaworn, W.; Siripong, P. Cytotoxic activity of essential oils of Mentha spp. on human carcinoma cells. J. Health Res. 2014, 28, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  117. Jerard, C.; Michael, B.P.; Chenicheri, S.; Vijayakumar, N.; Ramachandran, R. Rosmarinic Acid-Rich Fraction from Mentha arvensis Synchronizes Bcl/Bax Expression and Induces Go/G1 Arrest in Hepatocarcinoma Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 90, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Baskar, R.; Lee, K.A.; Yeo, R.; Yeoh, K.W. Cancer and radiation therapy: Current advances and future directions. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 9, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Baudino, T.A. Targeted Cancer Therapy: The Next Generation of Cancer Treatment. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2015, 12, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Citrin, D.E.; Mitchell, J.B. Altering the response to radiation: Sensitizers and protectors. Semin. Oncol. 2014, 41, 848–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cairnie, A.B. Adverse effects of radioprotector WR2721. Radiat. Res. 1983, 94, 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  122. Jagetia, G.C.; Baliga, M.S. Influence of the leaf extract of Mentha arvensis Linn. (mint) on the survival of mice exposed to different doses of gamma radiation. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2002, 178, 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  123. Samarth, R.M.; Goyal, P.K.; Kumar, A. Modulatory effect of Mentha piperita (Linn.) on serum phosphatases activity in Swiss albino mice against gamma irradiation. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 39, 479. [Google Scholar]
  124. Samarth, R.M.; Goyal, P.K.; Kumar, A. Modulation of serum phosphatases activity in Swiss albino mice against gamma irradiation by Mentha piperita Linn. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Samarth, R.M.; Kumar, A. Mentha piperita (Linn.) leaf extract provides protection against radiation induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow of mice. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 41, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Bhatia, A.L.; Sharma, A.; Patni, S.; Sharma, A.L. Prophylactic effect of flaxseed oil against radiation-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Phytother. Res. 2010, 21, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Highman, B.; Hanks, A.R. Serum intestinal alkaline phosphatase in rats after 800 R whole-body or regional x-irradiation. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1970, 133, 1201–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Stepan, J.J.; Havránek, T.; Jojková, K. Serum alkaline phosphatases as indicators of radiation damage in rats. Radiat. Res. 1977, 70, 406–414. [Google Scholar]
  129. Samarth, R.M.; Samarth, M. Protection against radiation-induced testicular damage in Swiss albino mice by Mentha piperita (Linn.). Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 104, 329–334. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic representation illustrating the anti-inflammatory activity exerted by M. arvensis and M. × piperita essential oils. MeEO, Mentha essential oil; LPS, Lipopolysaccharides; TLR4, Toll like receptor 4; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinases; NF-kB, nuclear factor-kappa B; IKK, IκB kinase; AP1, Activator Protein 1, NO, nitric oxide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; The above figure is drawn using BioRender illustrations.
Figure 1. Schematic representation illustrating the anti-inflammatory activity exerted by M. arvensis and M. × piperita essential oils. MeEO, Mentha essential oil; LPS, Lipopolysaccharides; TLR4, Toll like receptor 4; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinases; NF-kB, nuclear factor-kappa B; IKK, IκB kinase; AP1, Activator Protein 1, NO, nitric oxide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; The above figure is drawn using BioRender illustrations.
Horticulturae 09 00224 g001
Table 1. The morphological differences of M. arvensis and M. × piperita.
Table 1. The morphological differences of M. arvensis and M. × piperita.
SpeciesM. arvensisM. × piperita
Plant height10–60 cm30–100 cm
StemPurple at seedling stage and green at maturity, pilosePurplish-red and glabrous
LeafPale green, densely pilose along veins and sparsely puberulent elsewhereDark green, glabrous or below veins bristly and densely glandular
FlowerCorolla mauve, whorled on stems at leaf basesCorolla white, lobes with pink halo, verticillaster form spica at the tips of stems and branches
Table 2. The phytochemicals with antioxidant potentials present in M. arvensis and M. × piperita.
Table 2. The phytochemicals with antioxidant potentials present in M. arvensis and M. × piperita.
SpeciesTissue/Sample ExtractClassCompoundReferences
M. arvensisEssential oilTerpenoidGeranyl acetate[60]
Pulegone/lsopulegone[60]
Menthonel lsomenthone[60]
Menthone[60]
Menthyl acetate[61]
Menthone[61]
Terpenoid[62]
Menthol[61,63]
Menthyl acetate[63]
Pulegone[63]
Limonene[63]
Isomenthone[63]
Menthone[63]
Isomenthone[63]
Menthol[61,63]
M. × piperitaRhizomePhenolic acidsProtocatechuic aldehyde[64]
Luteolin-7-O-rutinoside
Caffeic acid
Salvianolic acid
Lithospermic acid
Salvianolic acid B
Hesperetin-7-O-rutinoside
Rosmarinic acid
Eriodictyol-7-O-rutinoside
M. × piperitaEssential oilTerpenoidSabinene[32]
β-Pinene
β-Myrcene
α-Terpinene
Limonene
1,8-Cineole
cis-Sabinene hydrate
Linalool
Menthone
Menthofuran
δ-Terpineol
neo-Menthol
Menthol
Terpinen-4-ol
Pulegone
Piperitone
Geranyl acetate
(E)-β-Farnesene
Germacrene D
Elixene
Viridiflorol
Monoterpene
Hydrocarbons
Oxygenated monoterpenes
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
M. × piperitaLeaf PhenolsSinapic acid[65]
Gallic acid
Catechin
Caffeic acid
Chloregenic acid
Rutin
Quercetin
p-Coumaric acid
Coumarin
Carvacerol
Vanilin
Trans-ferulic acid
Hesperedin
Ellagic acid
Eugenol
Hesperetin
M. × piperitaLeafFlavanonesNaringenin
Eriodictyiol
Hesperetin
Apigenin
Luteolin
Diosmetin
[60]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, H.; Kong, S.; Jayaraman, V.; Selvaraj, D.; Soundararajan, P.; Manivannan, A. Mentha arvensis and Mentha × piperita-Vital Herbs with Myriads of Pharmaceutical Benefits. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020224

AMA Style

Wei H, Kong S, Jayaraman V, Selvaraj D, Soundararajan P, Manivannan A. Mentha arvensis and Mentha × piperita-Vital Herbs with Myriads of Pharmaceutical Benefits. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(2):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Hao, Shuai Kong, Vanitha Jayaraman, Dhivya Selvaraj, Prabhakaran Soundararajan, and Abinaya Manivannan. 2023. "Mentha arvensis and Mentha × piperita-Vital Herbs with Myriads of Pharmaceutical Benefits" Horticulturae 9, no. 2: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop