Next Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization of Beverage Based on Lactic Fermentation of Goat’s Milk Whey and Fruit Juice Mixes by Kefir Granules
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Assessment of Probiotic and Technological Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Indigenously Fermented Cereal-Based Food Products
Previous Article in Journal
Heterologous Expression of Thermotolerant α-Glucosidase in Bacillus subtilis 168 and Improving Its Thermal Stability by Constructing Cyclized Proteins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single and Co-Cultures of Proteolytic Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Manufacture of Fermented Milk with High ACE Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Probiotic Characteristics of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus as Influenced by Carao (Cassia grandis)

1
Faculty of Technological Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Agricultura, Road to Dulce Nombre de Culmí, Km 215, Barrio El Espino, Catacamas 16201, Honduras
2
School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(10), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100499
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 16 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postbiotics from Production to Their Health-Promoting Aspects)

Abstract

:
Carao is considered a functional ingredient since its bioactive compounds are meaningful in nutritional, pharmacological, and medicinal applications. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of carao pulp powder on the bacterial viability, acid tolerance, bile tolerance, and protease activity of S. thermophilus STI-06 and L. bulgaricus LB-12. M17 broth with 0.5% lactose and MRS broth were used for S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus, respectively, for determining bacterial viability, acid tolerance, and bile tolerance. Skim milk was used to study the protease activity of both bacteria. The carao was added at 0 (control), 1.3, 2.6, and 5.3 (g/L) into the broths and skim milk. The broths were enumerated for bacterial viability (every 2 h), bile tolerance (every 4 h), and acid tolerance (every 30 min), and the skim milk was analyzed for protease activity (every 12 h). The General Linear Model (PROC GLM) was used to analyze the data. The 2.6 g/L and 5.3 g/L usage level of carao improved the acid tolerance of S. thermophilus. Carao did not affect the acid tolerance of L. bulgaricus. The usage of 5.3 g/L of carao significantly improved the bile tolerance and protease activity of both bacteria. However, carao did not affect the viability of either bacteria. Overall, 5.3 g/L of carao with these probiotics could be recommended in fermentation processes.

1. Introduction

Probiotics are viewed as functional ingredients since they can play a critical role in gut microbiota composition [1]. This group of bacteria can obstruct the colonization of pathogenic bacteria in the intestine by preventing or treating gastrointestinal issues such as diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, intestinal inflammation, and allergies. Currently, the food industry is interested in increasing the functionality of food products to obtain nutritional benefits, such as preventing intestinal system disorders, improving intestinal microflora, and increasing the strength of the host immune system [2]. The probiotic strains commonly used to promote host health and control food-borne bacteria are typically lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The Lactobacillus species are the most frequently used probiotics, and there are more than 500 probiotic food products that have been launched [3].
Probiotics deliver health benefits beyond regular nutrition, but their application can be limited depending on the type of stress they might face. The number of bacteria present in the digestive system varies widely in the different sections due to the acidic conditions and the high concentration of bile salts. After consumption, probiotics must survive severe stomach and intestinal tract conditions such as high acidity, hydrolytic enzymes, oxygen exposure, bile salts, osmotic stress, and competition with indigenous gut microbes [4,5]. The saliva has the highest microbial load, ranging from 107 to 109 CFU/mL [6]. On the other hand, the stomach has the lowest counts of microorganisms, with less than 10³ CFU/mL, where gastric secretions containing hydrochloric acid exert a microbicidal effect attributed to the low pH (<3) [7]. For these reasons, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) have recommended that functional food with probiotics should contain at least 107 CFU/g [8].
Commonly, yogurt is a source of probiotics and is considered a good vehicle for bioactive compounds sourced from dietary ingredients, such as proteins, vitamins, minerals, polyphenols, and medical herbs and plants. The food industry is also seeking new sources of bioactive compounds.
In South America, Cassia grandis (carao) is an exotic plant that has been used by indigenous tribes for centuries for treating anemia, skin ulcers, and diabetes [9]. Fuentes et al. [10] stated that carao has great potential for nutritional, pharmacological, and medicinal applications. Fuentes et al. [11] determined that in the pulp, seeds, and bark, there are high amounts of carotenoids, the precursors of vitamin A, which promote the formation and conservation of dental and bone tissues, mucous membranes, and skin. It also contains minerals such as calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, copper, zinc, manganese, phosphorus, sulfur, and iron in high levels, which are relevant to the treatment of anemia. In addition, the proximal composition showed a high concentration of proteins, which could be up to 10.11% in the seeds [11]. For phenolic content, Cassia grandis has an abundance of hydroxybenzoic acids, flavonols, flavanols, flavanones, and proanthocyanidins [12]. In addition, carao has been utilized to enhance sensory properties in food systems. Carao gives higher aroma scores in Californian-style black olives, and the masking effect was notable because of its sweet smell. The pleasant odors compounds were methyl-ester-2-propenoic acid, dimethyl silanediol, p-cymene, and diallyl disulfide [13].
Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LB-12 are yogurt starter cultures that provide health benefits, but both microorganisms could be affected, to some degree, by the low gastric pH and the presence of pepsin (an antimicrobial) in the gastrointestinal tract [14]. As a result, the objective was to study the effect of carao on the bacterial viability characteristics, acid tolerance, bile tolerance, and protease activity of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The carao fruit was gathered in the Guapinol Biological Reserve, Marcovia Municipality, Choluteca Department (Honduras), between August and September 2021. Carao fruit was manually peeled and the pulp was separated. Later, the pulp was mixed with water (10% wt./wt.) and stored frozen (−80 °C) until it was lyophilized (LIOTOP model L 101). The obtained solution was lyophilized at −73 to −76 °C and 0.1–0.3 Pa for 48 h. The lyophilized pulp was ground in a commercial mill (LABOR model SP31). The pulp powder was vacuum-packed in plastic bags.

2.2. Experimental Design

The growth characteristics and acid and bile tolerance of Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 and Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB-12 (Chr. Hansen, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were analyzed separately using M17 broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing 0.5% lactose (S. thermophilus) and MRS broth (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) (L. bulgaricus). For the bacterial viability and acid and bile tolerance, counts were enumerated using MRS agar (for L. bulgaricus) and S. thermophilus agar (for S. thermophilus) at various time points. The protease activity of both bacteria was also determined separately in skim milk (Great Value, Leander, TX, USA). In addition to the control (broths without carao), carao was individually added to the broths and the milk at three different concentrations (1.3, 2.65, and 5.3 g/L). For protease activity, the free amino groups were determined by spectrophotometry measurements. All of the experiments were conducted in triplicate with duplicate readings in the case of microbial growth evaluations and acid and bile tolerance, and with quadruplicate readings for protease activity.

2.3. Bacterial Viability

The bacterial viability of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus was studied according to Loghavi et al. [15] with some changes. Cultures were aseptically inoculated (5% (v/v)) into sterile MRS broth pH 5.2 (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) (L. bulgaricus) and M17 broth pH 6.8 (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) with lactose (0.5%) (S. thermophilus). For the MRS broth, sodium thioglycolate was added as an oxygen scavenger to obtain anaerobic conditions. The broths were incubated aerobically at 37 °C (M17 broth) and anaerobically at 43 °C (MRS broth) for 8 h. The colonies were enumerated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 h as described in the enumeration of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus section.

2.4. Acid Tolerance Test

The acid tolerance of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus was studied according to Pereira and Gibson [16] with some changes. Both MRS and M17 broths were acidified by adjusting the pH to 2.0 with 1N HCl and then autoclaved. After cooling, cultures were inoculated (10% (v/v)) into sterile MRS broth (L. bulgaricus) (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) and M17 broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) with lactose (0.5%) (S. thermophilus). The broths were incubated aerobically at 37 °C (M17 broth) and anaerobically at 43 °C (MRS broth) for 2 h. The colonies were enumerated at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min in both of the broths, as described in the enumeration of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus section

2.5. Bile Tolerance Test

The bile tolerance of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus was examined according to Pereira and Gibson [16] with some modifications. Oxgall (bovine bile) (US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) was incorporated (0.3% (w/v)) into both the MRS and M17 broths. In the case of the MRS broth, sodium thioglycolate was added as an oxygen scavenger to obtain anaerobic conditions. Both of the broths were then autoclaved. After cooling, cultures were aseptically inoculated (10% (v/v)) into sterile MRS broth (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) (L. bulgaricus) and M17 broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) with lactose (0.5%) (S. thermophilus). The broths were incubated aerobically at 37 °C (M17 broth) and anaerobically at 43 °C (MRS broth) for 8 h. The colonies were enumerated at 0, 4, and 8 h in both of the broths, as described in the enumeration of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus section.

2.6. Enumeration of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus

For the preparation of the S. thermophilus agar, 10 g of sucrose (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA), 2 g of K2HPO4 (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA), 5 g of Bacto yeast extract, and 10 g of Bacto Tryptone (Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) were mixed in 1 L of distilled water. The pH of the S. thermophilus media was adjusted to 6.8 with 1N HCl before adding 6 mL of 0.5% bromocresol purple solution and 15 g of agar (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) [17]. For the preparation of the MRS agar, 15 g of agar (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) and 55 g of Lactobacilli MRS broth powder (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) were mixed in 1 L of distilled water. The pH of the media was adjusted to 5.2 with 1N HCl. The M17 and MRS broths were serially diluted to several dilutions with 99 mL of sterilized peptone water (0.1% (w/v)) before plating with autoclaved media. The S. thermophilus plates were aerobically incubated at 37 °C for 24 h whereas the L. bulgaricus plates were incubated anaerobically at 43 °C for 72 h. The colonies were determined by using a Quebec Darkfield Colony Counter (Leica Inc., Buffalo, NY, USA).

2.7. Protease Activity

The protease activity of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus was examined by the Oberg et al. [18] method. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus were inoculated (1% (v/v)) aseptically into separate bottles of sterile skim milk (Great Value, Leander, TX, USA). The skim milk with S. thermophilus was incubated at 37 °C while the skim milk with L. bulgaricus was incubated at 43 °C. The protease activity was monitored at 0, 12, and 24 h. After each incubation time, a 2.5 mL sample of the skim milk with culture was vortexed with 1 mL of distilled water in a test tube. The diluted skim milk sample was vortexed after adding 5 mL of 0.75 N trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for protein precipitation and then set for 10 min at room temperature. The precipitated milk was then filtered through Whatman 40 filter paper (Whatman, Clifton, NJ, USA). The TCA filtrate (150 µL) was vortexed with 3 mL of o-phthaldialdehyde solution in a cuvette. The o-phthaldialdehyde solution was prepared by mixing 25 mL of 100 mM sodium borate (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution, 2.5 mL of 20% (w/w) SDS solution (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 40 mg of o-phthaldialdehyde reagent (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) dissolved in 1 mL methanol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 100 µL of β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and diluting to 50 mL with distilled water. The absorbance was measured by using a Nicolet Evolution 100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) at 340 nm. The o-phthaldialdehyde solution was used as a blank and the non-inoculated sterile skim milk was used as the reference.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The General Linear Model (PROC GLM) was used to analyze the data in the Statistical Analysis System 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The experiments were analyzed as a two-factor factorial experiment in a randomized block design. To determine significant differences, differences of least square means (α = 0.05) were utilized for main effects (carao concentration and time) and interaction effect (carao concentration × time). The significant differences (p < 0.05) among the main effects were analyzed using Tukey’s adjustment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bacterial Viability

The growth is shown for Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 (Figure 1) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB-12 (Figure 2) over 16 h of incubation as influenced by the inclusion of different concentrations of carao. For both bacteria, the carao concentration effect and the carao concentration × hour interaction effect were not significant (p > 0.05), whereas the hour effect was significant (p < 0.05). For S. thermophilus, the log count increased from 11.23 to 11.73 during the first 2 h, and then it declined from 11.73 to 10.78 between 2 and 16 h for control samples. S. thermophilus counts for samples containing 1.3 g/L, 2.6 g/L, and 5.3 g/L of carao followed a similar growth tendency. For L. bulgaricus, the log count increased from 10.34 to 10.57 during the first 2 h, and then decreased from 10.57 to 10.07 between 2 and 16 h for control samples. Similar results were found for samples with incorporated carao at 1.3 g/L, 2.6 g/L, and 5.3 g/L. In our study, carao did not affect the growth of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus during 16 h of incubation meaning that carao may be utilized at these concentrations with these two bacteria in fermentation processes. Carao has plenty of nutrients, including carbohydrates (71.40%) (particularly sucrose), proteins (7.41%), and minerals (3.14%) [11].
Amirdivani and Baba [19] and Joung et al. [20] noted that herbs and plants such as peppermint (Mentha piperita), dill (Anethum graveolens), basil (Ocimum basilicum), iospyros kaki leaf, and Nelumbo nucifera leaf improved the metabolic activity of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus in yogurt. Herbal plants may have prebiotic characteristics due to their active ingredients, such as anethole in anise, menthol in peppermint, cinnamaldehyde in cinnamon and may improve gut microflora [21,22,23].
S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus have a synergistic effect regarding their growth. The amino acids and small peptides generated by the proteolytic system of L. bulgaricus promote the growth of S. thermophilus [24,25,26], while the carbon dioxide, formic acid, folic acid, pyruvic acid, long chain fatty acids, and glutathione produced by S. thermophilus facilitate the growth of L. bulgaricus [26]. The main lactic acid bacterial metabolites are lactic acid, short-chain fatty acids, γ-amino butyric acid, conjugated linoleic acid, and bacteriocins [26]. An industrial-relevant physiological trait of S. thermophilus is its well-established symbiotic relationship with Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus during milk fermentation which correlates with faster growth and acidification, as well as enhanced aroma compound formation. The interaction between the two species is classified as protocooperation, based on the exchange of metabolites beneficial for optimal growth.
Compared to other LAB, S. thermophilus possesses a unique lactose uptake system: LacS, a secondary carrier, which acts primarily as a lactose–galactose antiporter, but also as a lactose–galactose-proton symporter. Following lactose uptake and cleavage by β-galactosidase (LacZ), the glucose moiety is utilized through glycolysis, while galactose is excreted into the medium by most strains [26].

3.2. Acid Tolerance

The acid tolerance of S. thermophilus over 120 min of incubation as influenced by the addition of various concentrations of carao is shown in Figure 3. The carao concentration effect, the hour effect, and the carao concentration × hour interaction effect were significant (p < 0.05). The log count dropped from 9.18 to 6.73 during the first 30 min and from 6.73 to 3.95 between 30 and 120 min for acidified control broths. The broths incorporating 1.3 g/L of carao had a similar tendency for counts as control broths. The log counts of S. thermophilus in broths containing 5.3 g/L of carao decreased with time at a slower rate in an acidic condition.
The acid tolerance of L. bulgaricus over 120 min of incubation as affected by the inclusion of various concentrations carao is illustrated in Figure 4. The carao concentration effect and the carao concentration × hour interaction effect were not significant (p > 0.05), while the hour effect was significant (p < 0.05). The log count decreased from 9.07 to 7.78 during the first 30 min and from 7.78 to 3.11 during 30 to 120 min of acid exposure for the control broths. The carao inclusion of 1.3 g/L, 2.6 g/L, and 5.3 g/L resulted in a similar trend as for control broths.
S. thermophilus requires amino acids, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals for growth [27]. It is likely that the microbial nutrients in carao could be used by S. thermophilus for growth. In acidified conditions, S. thermophilus is not susceptible to proliferating, as the lactic acid bacteria ideally grow between a pH of 5.5 to 7.0 [28]. The acidic conditions inhibit microbial growth by lowering the cytoplasm pH, leading to inactivating critical enzymes, which lessens their capacity to produce ATP, proteins, and essential nutrients for growth [14]. Lactobacillus bacteria can survive acidic environments if there is a regulation of enzymatic activities to harmonize the ideal flow of carbohydrates [29]. As a result, L. bulgaricus generates rapid molecular responses to restore the damage, and this adaptation can improve the rigidity and impermeability of its membrane [30].

3.3. Bile Tolerance

The bile tolerance of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus over 8 h of incubation as affected by the addition of various concentrations of carao is presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. For both probiotics, the carao concentration effect, the hour effect, and carao concentration × hour interaction effect were significant (p < 0.05). There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in log counts at 0 versus 4 h of bile exposure for a given concentration for both bacteria. Log counts at 8 h were significantly (p < 0.05) higher for broth containing 5.3 g/L of carao compared to control broths. For S. thermophilus, the log count decreased from 10.27 to 6.59 during 8 h for the control. On the other hand, the log count for the sample containing 5.3 g/L of carao decreased from 10.38 to 6.75 during the 8 h. For L. bulgaricus, the log count decreased from 9.02 to 6.27 during 8 h for the control. For the sample containing 5.3 g/L of carao, the log count decreased from 9.05 to 6.51 during the 8 h.
Similarly, Vargas et al. [14] observed a cell reduction count of S. thermophilus (in M17 broth) and L. bulgaricus (in MRS broth), respectively, in media containing 0.3% oxgall. Generally, the bacterial cell envelope of probiotics is highly vulnerable to bile salts, and these salts can penetrate the bacteria cell membrane causing shrinkage and leakage of hazardous intracellular material [31]. The bile can emulsify the lipid content from the microbial membrane [32], and this action makes bile hazardous to probiotics. Carao can act as an inhibitor of digestive enzymes such as pancreatic lipase [9]. Carao could possibly function as a barrier between the lipid membrane and the bile to protect these bacteria, leading to higher log counts in broths with carao.

3.4. Protease Activity

The protease activity (absorbance values) of S. thermophilus over incubation of 0, 12, and 24 h, as influenced by the addition of various concentrations of carao into skim milk, is displayed in Table 1. The carao concentration effect, the hour effect, and the carao concentration × hour interaction effect were significant (p < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in absorbance values between various carao concentration at both 0 and 12 h, the inclusion of carao at 5.3 g/L into skim milk showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher protease activity than the control at 24 h of incubation. At 24 h, skim milk containing 5.3 g/L of carao had the highest protease activity, while the control samples and samples containing 1.3 g/L of carao had the lowest values.
Generally, S. thermophilus has a low peptidase activity when compared to other lactic acid bacteria [33]. Depending on the strain, the proteolytic complex of S. thermophilus is integrated with peptidases that have distinct properties and specificities compared to other LAB. Although S. thermophilus has few amino acid requirements, many of the strains possess the necessary enzymes for casein hydrolysis, uptake of the resulting peptides, and hydrolysis into free amino acids. From an industrial point of view, the proteolytic system of S. thermophilus is associated with faster growth and milk acidification, together with increased cell numbers. The proteolytic system in S. thermophilus consists of: a serine protease, PrtS, attached to the cell wall by Sortase A and responsible for casein hydrolysis; a group of membrane transporters for oligopeptides or di- and tri-peptide uptake; and an assortment of both intracellular and cell-associated extracellular peptidases responsible for oligopeptide digestion and free amino acid liberation [34]. Carao could possibly enhance the cell density of S. thermophilus. Carao has significant amounts of sucrose [11], and using skim milk with sucrose has been shown to increase S. thermophilus counts compared to using solely skim milk media [35]. It is expected that a higher cell density could drive increased protease activity [36].
The protease activity (absorbance) of L. bulgaricus over incubation of 0, 12, and 24 h, as influenced by the inclusion of various concentrations of carao into skim milk, is illustrated in Table 2. The carao concentration effect, the hour effect, and the carao concentration × hour interaction effect were significant (p < 0.05). Similar to the results for S. thermophilus, the addition of carao did not significantly (p > 0.05) affect initial absorbance values. Therefore, increases in absorbance reading over time can be related to proteolysis. The addition of carao at 5.3 g/L into skim milk showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher protease activity than the control at 12 and 24 h of incubation. Similar to S. thermophilus, the skim milk containing 5.3 g/L of carao had the highest protease activity, whereas the control samples and samples containing 1.3 g/L of carao had the lowest values at 12 and 24 h. Higher protease activity was detected in L. bulgaricus LB-12 than in S. thermophilus STI-06.
Shah and Jelen [37] reported similar results. Similar to the effect for S. thermophilus, carao has significant amounts of sucrose, which could increase the cell density of L. bulgaricus, leading to higher protease activity [38]. For achieving maximum survival under stressful conditions, proteolytic activity is a crucial necessity. Therefore, carao addition could be recommended in growing Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 and Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB-12.

4. Conclusions

The effect of carao concentration on bacterial viability, acid tolerance, bile tolerance, and protease activity of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus was investigated. For both probiotics, carao did not affect the viability during 16 h of incubation. The broths with 5.3 g/L of carao improved acid tolerance of S. thermophilus for 120 min of exposure to acid. On the other hand, carao did not affect the acid tolerance of L. bulgaricus. For both bacteria, 5.3 g/L of carao improved bile tolerance during 8 h of exposure and increased protease activity over 24 h of incubation. Overall, carao had some positive effects on probiotic characteristics. Therefore, it is likely that carao at 5.3 g/L concentration may improve the probiotic properties of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus in fermented dairy products.

Author Contributions

D.P. performed most of the research; C.B. and K.A. assisted with design of the experiments; R.S.A. assisted with statistical analyses, writing the first draft of the manuscript and data recollection; R.C. assisted with data collection; D.W.O. assisted with the editing of the manuscript; J.M. and C.B. were in charge of the supervision and administration of the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by hatch project LAB94511, the School of Animal Sciences at Louisiana State University. In addition, this work was also supported by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the National University of Agriculture (Universidad Nacional de Agricultura) (Honduras).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The date are available from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Hatch project LAB94511. The authors thank the School of Animal Sciences at Louisiana State University and University National of Agriculture (Honduras).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have not stated any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Plaza, J.; Ruiz, F.; Campos, M.; Gil, A. Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S49–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, X. Probiotics regulate gut microbiota: An effective method to improve immunity. Molecules 2021, 26, 6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gupta, S.; Abu-Ghannam, N. Probiotic fermentation of plant based products:possibilities and opportunities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fiocco, D.; Longo, A.; Arena, M.; Russo, P.; Spano, G.; Capozzi, V. How probiotics face food stress: They get by with a little help. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 60, 1552–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rishi, P.; Mavi, S.; Bharrhan, S.; Shukla, G.; Tewari, R. Protective efficacy of probiotic alone or in conjunction with a prebiotic in Salmonella-induced liver damage. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 69, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tannock, G.W. Microecology of the gastrointestinal tract in relation to lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 1995, 5, 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Campeotto, F.; Waligora-Dupriet, A.J.; Doucet-Populaire, F.; Kalach, N.; Dupont, C.; Butel, M.J. Mise en place de la flore intestinale du nouveau-né flore intestinale mise au point. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 2007, 31, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morelli, L.; Capurso, L. FAO/WHO guidelines on probiotics: 10 years later. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2012, 46, S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lafourcade, A.; Achod, L.; Keita, H.; Carvalho, J.; de Souza, T.; Amado, J. Development, pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of a new tablet formulation based on Cassia grandis fruit extract. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 16, 00244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fuentes, J.; Aleman, R.; Linares, I.; Sánchez, J. The Carao (Cassia grandis L.): Its potential usage in pharmacological, nutritional, and medicinal applications. Innovations in biotechnology. In Innovations in Biotechnology for a Sustainable Future; Maddela, N.R., García, L.C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuentes, J.; Fernández, I.; Fernández, H.; Sánchez, J.; Alemán, R.; Alarcon, M. Quantification of bioactive molecules, minerals and bromatological analysis in carao (Cassia grandis). J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fuentes, J.; Salas, L.; Linares, I.; Alarcón, M.; Carretero, A.; Lozano, J. Development of an innovative pressurized liquid extraction procedure by response surface methodology to recover bioactive compounds from carao tree seeds. Foods 2021, 10, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Montero, F.I.; Fuentes, J.; Cascos, G.; Saravia, M.S.; Lozano, J.; Martín, D. Masking effect of Cassia grandis sensory defect with flavoured stuffed olives. Foods 2022, 11, 2305–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vargas, L.; Olson, D.; Aryana, K. Whey protein isolate improves acid and bile tolerances of Streptococcus thermophilus ST-M5 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LB-12. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 2215–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Loghavi, L.; Sastry, S.; Yousef, A. Effect of moderate electric field on the metabolic activity and growth kinetics of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pereira, D.; Gibson, G. Cholesterol assimilation by lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria isolated from the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4689–4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dave, R.I.; Shah, N.P. Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Btfidobacterium spp. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 1529–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oberg, C.; Wang, A.; Moyes, L.; Brown, R.; Richardson, G. Effects of proteolytic activity of thermolactic cultures on physical properties of mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amirdivani, S.; Baba, A. Changes in yogurt fermentation characteristics, and antioxidant potential and in vitro inhibition of angiotensin-1 converting enzyme upon the inclusion of peppermint, dill and basil. LWT 2011, 44, 1458–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Joung, J.; Lee, J.; Ha, Y.; Shin, Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.; Oh, N. Enhanced microbial, functional and sensory properties of herbal yogurt fermented with korean traditional plant extracts. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pelicano, E.R.L.; De Souza, P.A.; De Souza, H.B.A.; Leonel, F.R.; Zeola, N.M.B.L.; Boiago, M.M. Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 6, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Spring, P.; Wenk, C.; Dawson, K.A.; Newman, K.E. The effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the caeca of Salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Z.R.; Hu, C.H.; Xia, M.S.; Zhan, X.A.; Wang, M.Q. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sandine, W.E.; Elliker, P.R. Microbially induced flavours and fermented foods flavour in fermented dairy products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1970, 18, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Radke, L.; Sandine, W. Influence of temperature on associative growth of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 2558–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, W.; Li, H. Metabolites of Lactic Acid Bacteria. In Lactic Acid Bacteria in Foodborne Hazards Reduction; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 87–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, G.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Leng, C.; Sun, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A.; Feng, Z. Profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus MN-ZLW-002 nutrient requirements in controlled pH batch fermentations. Microbiologyopen 2018, 8, 00633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Santos, E.; Fernández, C.; Jaime, I.; Rovira, J. Comparative study of lactic acid bacteria house flora isolated in different varieties of ‘chorizo’. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 39, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhai, Z.; Douillard, F.; An, H.; Wang, G.; Guo, X.; Luo, Y.; Hao, Y. Proteomic characterization of the acid tolerance response in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CAUH1 and functional identification of a novel acid stress-related transcriptional regulator Ldb0677. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1524–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernandez, A.; Ogawa, J.; Penaud, S.; Boudebbouze, S.; Ehrlich, D.; van de Guchte, M.; Maguin, E. Rerouting of pyruvate metabolism during acid adaptation in Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Proteomics 2008, 8, 3154–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Begley, M.; Gahan, C.; Hill, C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 625–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gunn, J. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance and response to bile. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Letort, C.; Juillard, V. Development of a minimal chemically-defined medium for the exponential growth of Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rul, F.; Monnet, V. Presence of additional peptidases in Streptococcus thermophilus CNRZ 302 compared to Lactococcus lactis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 82, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, C.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z. Growth and exopolysaccharide production by Streptococcus thermophilus ST1 in skim milk. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 1470–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nurdini, L.; Nuraida, L.; Suwanto, A.; Suliantari. Microbial growth dynamics during tempe fermentation in two different home industries. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1668–1674. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shah, N.; Jelen, P. Survival of lactic acid bacteria and their lactases under acidic conditions. J. Food Sci. 1990, 55, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Silva, J.; Carvalho, A.; Pereira, H.; Teixeira, P.; Gibbs, P. Induction of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus by the addition of sucrose to the growth medium. J. Dairy Res. 2004, 71, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Log counts of S. thermophilus as influenced by carao concentration over the incubation period of 16 h.
Figure 1. Log counts of S. thermophilus as influenced by carao concentration over the incubation period of 16 h.
Fermentation 08 00499 g001
Figure 2. Log counts of L. bulgaricus as influenced by carao concentration over the incubation period of 16 h.
Figure 2. Log counts of L. bulgaricus as influenced by carao concentration over the incubation period of 16 h.
Fermentation 08 00499 g002
Figure 3. Log counts of S. thermophilus to show acid tolerance as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 120 min.
Figure 3. Log counts of S. thermophilus to show acid tolerance as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 120 min.
Fermentation 08 00499 g003
Figure 4. Log counts of L. bulgaricus to show acid tolerance as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 120 min.
Figure 4. Log counts of L. bulgaricus to show acid tolerance as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 120 min.
Fermentation 08 00499 g004
Figure 5. Log counts of S. thermophilus to show bile tolerance as influenced by carao concentration and incubation time over 8 h. AB Values not containing a common letter over various concentrations for a given time are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Figure 5. Log counts of S. thermophilus to show bile tolerance as influenced by carao concentration and incubation time over 8 h. AB Values not containing a common letter over various concentrations for a given time are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Fermentation 08 00499 g005
Figure 6. Log counts of L. bulgaricus to show bile tolerance as influenced by carao concentration and incubation time over 8 h. AB Values not containing a common letter over various concentrations for a given time are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Figure 6. Log counts of L. bulgaricus to show bile tolerance as influenced by carao concentration and incubation time over 8 h. AB Values not containing a common letter over various concentrations for a given time are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Fermentation 08 00499 g006
Table 1. Least square means for protease activity (absorbance) of Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 as influenced by carao over an incubation period of 24 h.
Table 1. Least square means for protease activity (absorbance) of Streptococcus thermophilus STI-06 as influenced by carao over an incubation period of 24 h.
Sample0 h12 h24 h
Control0.152 ± 0.015 a0.175 ± 0.007 a0.202 ± 0.011 a
1.3 g/L0.152 ± 0.020 a0.170 ± 0.010 a0.211 ± 0.011 a
2.6 g/L0.153 ± 0.017 a 0.185 ± 0.015 a 0.217 ± 0.014 ab
5.3 g/L0.154 ± 0.023 a0.186 ± 0.027 a0.232 ± 0.008 b
ab Column means not containing a common letter are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Table 2. Least square means for protease activity (absorbance) of Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB-12 as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 24 h.
Table 2. Least square means for protease activity (absorbance) of Lactobacillus bulgaricus LB-12 as influenced by carao concentration over an incubation period of 24 h.
Sample0 h12 h24 h
Control0.161 ± 0.005 a0.313 ± 0.007 b0.417 ± 0.017 b
1.3 g/L0.163 ± 0.005 a0.320 ± 0.015 b0.410 ± 0.025 b
2.6 g/L0.162 ± 0.005 a0.357 ± 0.017 ab0.455 ± 0.019 ab
5.3 g/L0.163 ± 0.007 a0.377 ± 0.013 a0.475 ± 0.013 a
ab Column means not containing a common letter are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paz, D.; Aleman, R.S.; Cedillos, R.; Olson, D.W.; Aryana, K.; Marcia, J.; Boeneke, C. Probiotic Characteristics of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus as Influenced by Carao (Cassia grandis). Fermentation 2022, 8, 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100499

AMA Style

Paz D, Aleman RS, Cedillos R, Olson DW, Aryana K, Marcia J, Boeneke C. Probiotic Characteristics of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus as Influenced by Carao (Cassia grandis). Fermentation. 2022; 8(10):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paz, David, Ricardo S. Aleman, Roberto Cedillos, Douglas W. Olson, Kayanush Aryana, Jhunior Marcia, and Charles Boeneke. 2022. "Probiotic Characteristics of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus as Influenced by Carao (Cassia grandis)" Fermentation 8, no. 10: 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop