Next Article in Journal
Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Caused by Non-fumigatus Aspergillus spp.
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Community of Black Meristematic Fungi Inhabiting the External White Marble of the Florence Cathedral
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Aspergillus niger Aquaporins Involved in Hydrogen Peroxide Signaling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Differences in Culturable Fungal Diversity Using Standard Freezing Incubation—A Case Study in the Limestones of Lemos Pantheon (Portugal)

1
Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE)—Science for People & the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
2
FitoLab—Laboratory for Phytopathology, Instituto Pedro Nunes, Rua Pedro Nunes, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal
3
TERRA—Associate Laboratory for Sustainable Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 501; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040501
Submission received: 20 March 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Biodeterioration)

Abstract

:
In this study, we explored the biodiversity and abundance of culturable fungi in four samples associated with different biodeterioration outlines collected from the Lemos Pantheon, a limestone-built artwork in Portugal. We compared the results from prolonged standard freezing with those previously obtained from fresh samples to analyze differences in the obtained community and assess the effectiveness of the standard freezing incubation protocol in uncovering a different segment of culturable fungal diversity. Our results showed a slight decrease in culturable diversity, but over 70% of the obtained isolates were not present in the previously studied fresh samples. We also identified a high number of potential new species with this procedure. Moreover, the use of a wide variety of selective culture media positively influenced the diversity of the cultivable fungi obtained in this study. These findings highlight the importance of developing new protocols under varying conditions to accurately characterize the culturable fraction in a given sample. The identification and study of these communities and their possible contribution to the biodeterioration process is crucial knowledge for formulating effective conservation and restoration plans to prevent further damage to valuable cultural heritage assets.

1. Introduction

Environments with extreme conditions are teeming with specialized microorganisms that can survive and thrive, despite their restrictive physical and chemical conditions [1,2]. In general, rock is a very harsh substrate to colonize due to limited access to nutrients and water, temperature fluctuations, and exposure to solar radiation, among other factors [3,4]. As a result, rock dwellers are forced to withstand long periods of stress-induced inactivity, and active life is only possible during short windows of more permissive conditions [5,6,7], which makes theese microbial communities highly dynamic structures in time and space, and their species composition can vary greatly depending on these conditions [8,9,10,11]. Fungi are considered one of the most relevant stone colonizers, being highly ubiquitous heterotrophic organisms, and are able to endure extreme environmental conditions and adopt several structural, morphological, and metabolic strategies to survive [12,13].
Stonework, such as historical buildings and monuments, is present around the world, and due to its historical, cultural, artistic, and religious importance, preserving and conserving its messages and intrinsic values is critical. The role of fungi in the decay of stone monuments remained underestimated for a long time, but it is now clear that they are powerful biodeteriogens and are often responsible for severe physical, chemical, and aesthetical modifications [3,12,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Therefore, studying fungal diversity found in these stone constructions can provide comprehensive information related to biodeterioration and it is a fundamental basis for its protection [16,17]. Nowadays, the study of biodeterioration of cultural heritage is a popular subject among researchers who aim to increase their understanding of its colonizers, the interaction between these organisms and substrates, and the sensitivity to biocides, in order to set, in collaboration with restorers, protocols to prevent and control the settlement of these organisms in restoration and control programs [20,21].
Metagenomics is currently thought of as the mainstream tool in profiling complex communities in cultural heritage biodeterioration studies [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], but in many circumstances proved insufficient on its own. In addition, isolation provided an added value for the accurate characterization of complex fungal communities [36]. Consequently, molecular profiling can be expected to provide different results from those obtained from culture isolation techniques, and the application of both approaches is desirable to discern the biodiversity in deeper detail since they complement their outputs and tackle both intrinsic limitations [34,36]. Despite the limitations inherent to culture-based techniques (which can be time-consuming and fail to detect all fungal species present in a given sample) [37,38], they are extremely important due to the advantage of having pure cultures isolated to carry out physiological and metabolic studies, and to understand ecological functions and identify specific interactions with materials and other organisms [39,40]. Furthermore, new strains can be obtained only with isolation for further characterization and description, thus enhancing our current knowledge of the true diversity of fungi. The recovery rate of fungi is estimated to be more than 70%; therefore, culture-based approaches are still extremely useful [40]. The effectiveness of isolation techniques can vary depending on the sample and/or the environment being studied. As a result, the creation of new protocols under varying conditions is crucial.
In a previous study [41], we conducted a thorough analysis of the fungal community composition on the Lemos Pantheon, a limestone monument located in the centre region of Portugal, using high-throughput sequencing in parallel with culture-based methodologies. The combined results revealed a highly diverse and dissimilar community according to the type of biodeterioration studied. However, in a direct comparison of the two approaches, we found a dramatic divergence between the sets of fungi identified. In addition, a great number of unidentified (possibly new) taxa were recovered from selective media through cultivation, which prompted us to further explore its cultivable fungal diversity.
“Exposure of cells to suboptimal growth conditions or to any environment that reduces cell viability or fitness can be considered stresses” [42], and can be classified as biotic or abiotic, including thermal (hot or cold) and non-thermal stress (e.g., water availability) [43]. Temperature is undoubtedly one of the major factors affecting the growth and survival of any microorganism [44]. Stress tolerance responses, such as alteration in protein expression and enzymatic activity, and cytoskeletal organization, among others, can generate both immediate and long-term adaptations, which are especially crucial for the survival of organisms in environments with extreme physicochemical parameters such as stone [43,45]. Since some fungi are able to cope with different stressors, including a remarkable resilience to withstand temperatures that go beyond their typical growth range, temperature was used as a selective condition to delve deeper into the cultivable diversity. Thus, this study aimed to: (1) characterize the fungal diversity associated with different biodeterioration phenomena, present in a limestone monument, after a prolonged period of standard freezing; (2) determine if the cold stress altered the previously isolated culturable community in the samples; (3) assess the effectiveness of freezing in recovering a different segment of culturable fungal diversity, thereby enhancing our understanding of the actual culturable fraction present.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Sampling Strategy

The present study was conducted on indoor samples collected in July 2021 at the Church of São Salvador da Trofa, a Catholic temple located in Trofa do Vouga, in the district of Aveiro, Portugal. This historic church houses the Lemos Pantheon, a 16th century burial place built in honor of the Lemos family, one of the most influential families in the region. Designated as a National Monument in 1992, it is the most important local landmark and a shining example of Portuguese funerary art [46]. The tomb is carved from white Ançã limestone, a unique type of Portuguese limestone, with a relatively high proportion of CaCO3 (>96.5%), known for its easy workability and intricate carvings [20,47]. Despite its beauty, the tomb complex has suffered from visible pathologies in certain areas, causing structural and aesthetic damage to the limestone.
In the sampling site, temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) were monitored at the beginning and end of the sampling procedure using a digital thermo-hygrometer, with median values of T 22 °C and RH 51%. A careful observation was made, and samples were collected from areas displaying clear signs of alteration and degradation. Four samples were collected, using both micro-invasive (scalpel scraping, 0.5 g/site) and non-invasive (nitrocellulose disc swabbing, Ø 5 cm, 2/site) sampling methods, and the different types of biodeterioration observed in these areas were classified based on the ICOMOS Illustrated Glossary of Stone Deterioration Patterns: L1 indicating Dark and Green Biofilm (DGB); L2 indicating Green Biofilm (GB); L3 indicating Black Discoloration (BD); and L4 indicating Salt Efflorescence (SE) [48], as described in our previous work [41]. Each sample was divided into two aliquots, one for Illumina high-throughput sequencing and the other for direct fungal isolation (suspended in 2 mL of sterile 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution). The results from these two analyses have already been published in Paiva et al. [41]. The samples intended for direct isolation were kept in a standard freezer at a low temperature (−18 ± 2 °C) for 6 months before they were reinoculated and used to analyze the differences in their fungal diversity composition in comparison to the fresh samples.

2.2. Isolation, Morphological and Molecular Identification

After being stored in a standard freezer at low temperature for 6 months, the aliquots from all 4 samples were reinoculated under the same conditions as the initial inoculation. Each aliquot was vortexed and 100 μL of the suspension was plated onto the same 6 different culture media used in the previous isolation campaign: Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA); Dichloran-glycerol Agar (DG-18); Malt Extract Agar supplemented with 10% NaCl (w/v) (MEA 10%); Czapek Solution Agar (CZ); Rose Bengal Agar Base (RB) and DSMZ 372-Halobacteria medium supplemented with 10% NaCl (w/v) (HM 10%), in triplicate. All culture media were supplemented with streptomycin (0.5 gL−1) to prevent bacterial growth. Inoculated media plates were incubated aerobically in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C for 6 months. The development of the colonies was checked weekly. Emerging colonies with distinct morphologies (in each culture medium) were transferred to axenic cultures in duplicate (PDA and into the medium from which they were originally recovered) and incubated for 15–30 days at the same temperature. Fungal isolates were then grouped according to their morphological traits (mycelium colour, texture and form, exudates, and growth rate), and genomic DNA was extracted from PDA pure cultures (one of each morphotype) with the REDExtract-N-Amp™ Plant PCR Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Obtained DNA was used for PCR amplification, according to the information summarized in Table 1, following the previously used protocols.
Amplification reactions were performed in 25 μL final volumes and consisted of 12.5 μL of NZYTaq Green Master Mix (NZYTech™, Lisbon, Portugal), 1 μL of each primer (10 mM), 9.5 μL of ultra-pure water, and 1 μL of template DNA, using an ABI GeneAmp™ 9700 PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Visual confirmation of the overall amplification was performed using agarose gel electrophoresis (1.2%) stained with GreenSafe Premium (NZYTech™, Lisbon, Portugal) and visualized in a Molecular Imager Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR™ (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Obtained amplicons were purified with the EXO/SAP Go PCR Purification Kit (GRISP, Porto, Portugal) and sequenced using an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer system (96 capillary instruments) at STABVIDA, Portugal. Obtained sequences were analyzed and processed using Chromas v.2.6.6 (Technelysium, Southport, QLD, Australia) and deposited in the GenBank database with the accession numbers OQ211114-OQ211174 (ITS), OQ330763–OQ330787 (BenA), OQ330788–OQ330801 (CaM), OQ330802–OQ330819 (Tef1), and OQ330820–OQ330828 (Act).
Similarity searches were performed, and sequences were queried against the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database using a BLASTn search algorithm [56]. To ensure accurate species identification, molecular results were verified through comprehensive macroscopic and microscopic analysis of taxonomic traits, resorting to Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org (accessed on 3 January 2023)) and Mycobank (https://www.mycobank.org/ (accessed on 3 January 2023)) [57,58].

2.3. Data Analysis

To evaluate the diversity of cultivable fungal communities resulting from freezing incubation, Species Richness (S), Shannon–Wiener index (H), Species Evenness (E), and Dominance (D) were calculated using PAST software package v.4.09 [59] for each sample (L1, L2, L3 and L4). Between samples, a Venn analysis was constructed to identify unique and shared fungal species. The community structure was analyzed based on the relative abundance of individual taxa within each sample (estimated by counting the number of emerged colonies of that morphotype in proportion to the total number of colonies for that sample). For this purpose, Microsoft® Excel® 2016 software was used to process, analyze, and visualize the results.
To visualize the differences in fungal diversity composition from both freezing incubation and fresh plating, ITS phylogeny was used to place retrieved isolates into their respective clades. Alignment of obtained ITS region sequences was performed using MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) software v.11.0.11 [60] and ClustalW algorithm [61] and refined with MUSCLE [62]. Phylogenetic reconstructions were made using Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses on the same platform. Determined by Mega software v.11.0.11, the best nucleotide substitution model for ML analysis of the obtained sequences for both cases was the Kimura 2-parameter with Gamma distribution. Bootstrap analysis was based on 100 replications.
The re-isolation of the same species can occur from different samples and different culture media plates from the same sample. Therefore, to assess fungal populations in the four studied sites, the general isolation results were analyzed as species presence–absence for each sampling site, regardless of the isolation method, as well as for each isolation media, regardless of the sampling site.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Frozen Diversity and Its Biodeteriorative Potential

Under the conditions used, a sum of 95 isolates was retrieved following the freezing procedure. Figure 1 displays several of the fungal isolates obtained in this study.
Based on morphology and molecular analysis of subsets of ITS, Tef, BenA, CaM, and Act sequence data, the obtained isolates were identified as 24 different species (Table A1). In addition, eleven isolates showed sufficient rDNA–ITS gene sequence divergence (similarity less than 97%) from previously cultured organisms, suggesting that they may represent novel species, although further work is required to validate their taxonomic position. Furthermore, filamentous actinobacteria belonging to the genus Streptomyces remained highly frequent in the samples subjected to freezing, as was observed in the fresh inoculation. Although several cultures of this bacterium were isolated, they were excluded from subsequent analysis. Diversity indices are presented in Table 2.
Overall, freezing incubation led to a decrease in diversity indices of the culturable fungi (the lowest H value in fresh samples was 1.53 in sample L4). Species richness, Shannon and Evenness index values were found to be higher in sample L1, resulting in a lower dominance, in contrast with sample L4 which presented the lowest diversity and higher dominance, indicating the presence of a more prevalent taxon (or taxa).
None of the isolated fungal species were found to be common across all four biodeterioration scenarios. Most of the species were found exclusively in one sample, with six species retrieved solely from L1 (DGB), four from L2 (GB), and seven from L3 (BD). Interestingly, L4 (SE) was the only sample without any exclusive species (Figure 2). It is plausible to suggest that this could be linked to the specific features of this sampling site, as sample L4 exhibited significant salt damage and these types of environments typically support a greater abundance of specialized organisms, which may not have the mechanisms to cope with the added stress of freezing temperatures. The L4 fresh sample contained two unique species, Aeminium ludgeri, a recently described xerophilic species, and a closely related unidentified isolate, which were not isolated after undergoing the freezing treatment. This suggests that these species may be sensitive to low temperatures or other stressors induced by the freezing process. Trovão et al. [63] have shown that A. ludgeri does not exhibit heat tolerance, and these results suggest that it may also be unable to tolerate cold and cannot survive extreme temperature variations.
Figure 3 displays the overall abundance results at the species level for all four samples. In general, Ascomycota was the dominant phylum in all four samples. The most frequently retrieved isolates in sample L1 were Aspergillus protuberus (relative abundance of 31.4%), followed by Amycosphaerella africana (11.6%), Aspergillus penicillioides (7.9%), and Cladosporium cladosporioides (6%); in sample, L2 were A. Protuberus (35.3%), Penicillium jiangxiense (35.3%), and A. penicillioides (21.6%); in sample, L3 were C. cladosporioides and P. brevicompactum (42.7% for both); and sample L4 was highly dominated by Parengyodontium album, which solely accounted for almost 85% of the total abundance. The relative abundance of the other Ascomycota species was ≤5%.
Phylum Basidiomycota was detected in samples L1, comprising 31.4% of the total abundance for that sample, with only one species identified, namely Stereum hirsutum; L2 and L3, representing less than 1% of the total abundance for those samples, with the species S. hirsutum and Coprinellus micaceus identified, respectively.
The eleven isolates for which a consensus on their identification was not attained were assigned into four different taxa, and the isolate UnId Fi_1 was found to be predominant in the samples L1 and L4 with 6.3% and 10.2% of the total abundance, respectively.
The taxonomic composition and structure of fungal communities differed among the analyzed samples, which is consistent with our previous study. Furthermore, despite being exposed to freezing temperatures, the samples yielded a wide range of isolated fungi as well as a high degree of potential novelty, confirming our earlier findings which pointed to stone as a very rich and diverse habitat [41].
To the best of our knowledge, from the 24 identified species, the following 10 were isolated (and kept in culture) for the first time, when considering limestone monuments: A. africana, A. penicillioides, A. protuberus, C. allicinum, C. sinuosum, C. micaceus, Diaporthe foeniculina, P. jiangxiense, Talaromyces acaricola and Tapesia fusca [20,34,64,65]. Excluding the unidentified isolates, many of the remaining species that were recovered have been previously related to the biodeterioration of stone and other materials. Alternaria infectoria, Cladosporium spp., Cyphellophora olivacea and Stachybotrys chartarum are known pigment producers, which have pigmented aerial mycelium and/or reproductive structures that cause chromatic alteration of the rock, an effect considered unesthetic [12,17,18]. In addition to this, S. chartarum can also produce extracellular pigments [66]. Besides aesthetic alterations, A. infectoria is also known to contribute to limestone exfoliation and biopitting [67]. Among acid-producing organisms, Acremonium charticola, C. olivacea, P. album, P. Brevicompactum and P. crustosum have been identified as having CaCO3 dissolution abilities [64,65,68,69,70,71], while A. infectoria, C. cladosporioides, P. brevicompactum, P. Crustosum and S. hirsutum can promote mineralization or crystallization [65,70,72,73], which can contribute to stone deterioration.
Of the species identified in this study as first reports on limestone, in general, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Penicillium and Talaromyces species are usually widely distributed, highly ubiquitous, and are considered among the most common genera found as indoor extremotolerant contaminants [74,75,76]. The A. penicillioides and A. protuberus have been previously reported with cellulolytic and proteolytic abilities [65,69], with the latter also being able to produce extracellular pigments [77]. Curiously, in this study, abundant precipitated minerals in various shapes and sizes were observed in HM 10% culture medium surrounding the fungal mycelia of A. penicillioides (Figure 4). Although other cultures were grown in the same media and conditions, mineral precipitation was only observed in A. penicillioides cultures. To discard spontaneous mineral precipitation events, we incubated in parallel non-inoculated Petri dishes with HM 10% cultured medium, and that phenomenon was not observed.
Aspergillus penicillioides, an obligate halophile commonly found in hypersaline environments [78], was always found associated with biofilms (samples L1 and L2). According to Zammit et al. [79], the biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) matrix has been shown to favour the retention of water and dissolved salts, which later crystallize due to evaporation and/or desiccation, providing favourable conditions for sustaining halophile organisms. This species’ mineralization ability is likely due to the reactions of secreted acids, indicating its potential acidogenic properties. Such mineralization singularities can also promote the development of various biodeterioration phenomena [80,81,82].
Amycosphaerella africana and D. foeniculina are plant pathogens [83,84], while C. micaceus and T. fusca are saprophytic species [85,86]. The occurrence of phytopathogenic or saprophytic fungi on the surface of the limestone may be due to their presence in the surrounding vegetation and soil of the studied area. Additionally, the environmental conditions, the chemical composition of the stone, together with the presence of other organisms and/or interactions between them may provide a suitable environment for the establishment and growth of these fungi.

3.2. Diversity vs. Isolation Method

A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using rDNA-ITS sequences of one representative of each species previously identified based on morphological and taxonomic characteristics, to assess the diversity of cultivable fungi obtained from freezing incubation (Figure 5A) and compare it with that obtained from direct plating using fresh samples (Figure 5B).
The phylogenetic analysis revealed a significant difference in species composition between the two procedures. In general, low temperature restricts species diversity, as the mycobiome is less diverse when compared to direct plating. Only seven of the originally isolated species were detected after freezing, namely, A. charticola, A. infectoria, C. cladosporioides, C. olivacea, P. album, P. brevicompactum and S. chartarum. The stress-tolerant strategists are able to prevail even after incubation at very low temperatures. The remaining 17 species were isolated and identified for the first time only after low-temperature treatment (which represents over 70% of the total diversity obtained after the freezing treatment).
Ascomycota was the dominant phylum in both approaches and there was about equal representation of Basidiomycota species between both procedures, with only two retrieved species. At the order level, the Cladosporiales, Eurotiales and Hypocreales were the most common; however, the number and distribution of fungal species varied considerably. Basidiomycota orders were different in both cases. These results are consistent with the available literature, since the majority of fungal communities associated with low-temperature environments (e.g., Alpine, Arctic and Antarctic) are dominated by filamentous ascomycetes [87,88]. Cladosporium cladosporioides and some representatives of the genus Penicillium have been previously reported from cold environments [89,90], while the remaining species isolated in this study are being reported for the first time as cold-tolerant organisms or psychrotrophic. Cyphellophora olivaceae (Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales) is included in the rock-inhabitant black fungi group known for its remarkable ability at exploiting all kinds of extreme environments and thriving at the edges of adaptability [91]. Therefore, its ability to resist freezing incubation does not come as a surprise. Filamentous basidiomycetes that are typically known as wood-decay fungi in temperate ecosystems have been very rarely isolated in these types of environments, [92,93] but nonetheless the species C. micaceus and S. hirsutum were only detected after freezing treatment. One very interesting and important find was the isolation of S. chartarum from both fresh and frozen samples. Stachybotrys chartarum is one of the world’s 10 most hazardous fungi when considering human and animal health, and it has been linked to sick-building syndrome [94]. Until now, this black mould has only been associated with environments that have relatively high humidity and cellulose-rich materials [95]; however, our findings suggest that this fungus may be more widespread than previously thought, as we were able to isolate it from limestone [41] and reisolate it after freezing incubation. It appears that these filamentous microfungi may be able to tolerate a broader range of conditions than previously assumed.
The impact of temperature was evident not only in the initial fungal species distribution pattern but also in their relative abundance. Although some species were common to both isolation procedures, their isolation frequencies differed significantly between samples that were directly plated versus those that were inoculated after freezing (Figure 6).
For instance, P. album became dominant in sample L4 since most of the species detected in direct plating disappeared, thus granting the chance for those that remained to appear more frequently. This effect is also observed in sample L3, for the species C. cladosporioides and P. brevicompactum. For these two particular samples (L3 and L4), the relative abundance of the fungal species common to both techniques is much higher when compared to the species that only appeared after cold treatment. The opposite is observed for samples L1 and L2, as they were the samples with the greatest species diversity in which the abundance of shared species decreased. As mentioned earlier in this paper, these differences may be related to the peculiarities of the sampling spot itself, as both samples originated from green biofilms.
In their natural environment, rock dwellers must cope with several different stresses and a combination of them [96]. Cold often implies osmotic stress since low temperatures increase water viscosity (ice crystals formation), and therefore cause a depletion of liquid water available for an active life. It may not be an adaptation to low temperature per se that influences fungal survival to such stress but rather to desiccation or the adaptations to both factors may be similar [89,90,96,97]. Fungi originating from polar climates, for example, have developed mechanisms to survive extreme conditions, including higher concentrations of sugars, alcohols, lipids and fatty acids, or antifreeze proteins in their cells compared to their mesophilic relatives [89,90]. Generally, hyphomycetes hyphae do not survive freezing, but spores often do [89].
The species distribution within the two protocols evidenced the predominance of well-known species, but also the presence of several relatively rare and sometimes unknown species. The seven species that were common to both methods included species belonging to cosmopolitan genera such as Alternaria, Cladosporium, Parengyodontium and Penicillium which are known for occurring in an extremely wide range of natural and man-made substrates. Their ubiquitous distribution can explain the significant prevalence of these cosmopolitan fungi even when cold stress was used. Generalist fungi are known for their high adaptability and tolerance to a wide range of physicochemical parameters, enabling them to thrive in diverse environments. Unlike specialist fungi, which are adapted to a narrow range of conditions, generalists have the ability to switch on stress responses only when required, conserving energy and resources. Despite their ability to tolerate extreme environments, generalist fungi can also be found in more common habitats, making them ubiquitous in nature. While specialists may exceed the extremotolerance of generalists in one stress factor, they often perform poorly in the absence of that specific stress and in response to other stressors [96].

3.3. Effect of Isolation Media

In this study, six different isolation media were used. The results revealed that fungi could be recovered from all six media, but the number of fungal isolates and the diversity of species varied among the media.
The medium MEA 10% had the most diverse group of fungal species with 12 different taxa (Figure 7A). None of the species were able to be isolated on all six media, indicating that most species had a specific preference for a certain growth medium (Figure 7B). For example, A. infectoria, C. micaceus and T. acaricola were only isolated from CZA; C. sinuosum and P. jiangxiense were only isolated from HM10%; T. fusca, Diaporthe foeniculina and S. chartarum were only isolated from MEA 10%; C. Halotolerans was only isolated from PDA; and A. africana was only isolated from RB. The remaining fungal species were isolated from more than one medium, with A. protuberus being the most retrieved species among different media, and DG18 being the only medium that did not have any exclusive species.
From the species segregation observed across the different media, it can be concluded that the use of various culture media was crucial for isolating a higher diversity of culturable species. Furthermore, according to their specific growth preferences, it is possible to verify a high dominance of halophilic and/or halotolerant species, distinguished by their ability to grow under high salinity conditions and subsequently low water activity. These results contrast with those of fresh samples, where xerophilic species dominated, with DG18 showing the highest number of distinct taxa in all samples, while salt-rich media, such as MEA 10% and HM 10%, had the lowest. Sterflinger’s research shed light on the possible connection between the preference for high salt media of these cold surviving fungi. In her study on “Temperature and NaCl- tolerance of rock-inhabiting meristematic fungi” [98], she observed that these fungi produce glycerol as a compatible solute to stabilize the osmotic potential under NaCl stress conditions simultaneously with temperature stress. Since glycerol accumulation is also a response to cold temperatures and acts as a cryoprotectant in fungi [89,90], this could be a possible explanation for the preference observed.
Although the cultivation and isolation of fungal species can be a challenging and time-consuming process, involving the use of different conditions and multiple culture media to ensure the highest possible diversity, as demonstrated by these results alongside those obtained from fresh samples, it is still worthwhile to make the effort when attempting to truly uncover and understand the culturable diversity. The diversity that can be obtained, the discovery of new species, and the possibility of further studying the obtained cultures, all together demonstrate the value of these classic methodologies. In fact, such efforts have led to numerous discoveries in the field of mycology and continue to be a crucial part of fungal research, making it worth the time and resources required.

4. Conclusions

Life finds a way to thrive in even the harshest environments. In our studies, we found that the mycobiota associated with different types of biodeterioration patterns present in limestone were taxonomically distinct, indicating that different populations occur in distinct niches on the same lithology. This finding remained valid even after subjecting these populations to cold stress. Furthermore, the freezing incubation protocol proved to be a useful tool in uncovering a different segment of culturable diversity, thereby enhancing our understanding of the actual culturable fraction present in the studied samples. By adding different culture conditions, we were able to simulate, reproduce and/or mimic the selective constraints that can naturally shape these stone mycobionts. Moreover, characterizing how selective pressures, such as freezing temperatures, favour certain species over others, and how some fungi can overcome extremely low temperatures, which can be used to predict how these fungal populations may shift according to environmental changes in their natural habitat. Since undoubtedly a minority population can have a substantial effect on the ecology, these findings are crucial knowledge to formulate effective conservation strategies to prevent biodeterioration and create effective and well-planned restoration plans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.P., N.M., I.T. and A.P.; methodology, D.S.P., L.F., E.P. and J.T.; software, D.S.P.; validation, D.S.P., N.M., I.T. and A.P.; formal analysis, D.S.P.; Investigation, D.S.P.; resources, N.M., I.T. and A.P.; data curation, D.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.P.; writing—review and editing, D.S.P., L.F., J.T., N.M., I.T. and A.P.; visualization, D.S.P.; supervision, N.M., I.T. and A.P.; project administration, A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Diana Paiva was supported by a PhD research grant (UI/BD/150843/2021) awarded by the Centre for Functional Ecology—Science for People & the Planet (CFE) and co-funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT) through national funding by the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES) from Fundo Social Europeu (FSE). This work was carried out in the R&D Unit Centre for Functional Ecology—Science for People & the Planet (CFE), with reference UIDB/04004/2020, financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC). The authors also received funding from the Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR) and the NextGeneration EU European Funds.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are presented in the paper. The nucleotide sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers: OQ211114-OQ211174 (ITS); OQ330763–OQ330787 (benA); OQ330788–OQ330801 (CaM); OQ330802–OQ330819 (tef1) and OQ330820–OQ330828 (Act).

Acknowledgments

Phylogenetic trees figure annotations were created with https://app.biorender.com/ (accessed on 19 January 2023). Venn diagrams and Bubble maps were plotted by http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/srplot (accessed on 19 January 2023), an online platform for data analysis and visualization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. The provenance of all isolates and GenBank accession numbers of fungal isolates retrieved in this study.
Table A1. The provenance of all isolates and GenBank accession numbers of fungal isolates retrieved in this study.
IsolateSampleMediumIsolate IDGenBank Accession NumbersNotes
ITSTranslation Elongation Factor 1α (tef1)β-Tubulin (benA)Calmodulin (CaM)Partial Actin (Act)
PL133L4MEA 10%Parengyodontium albumOQ211122OQ330805a
PL134L3RBCladosporium cladosporioidesOQ211118OQ330822a
PL135L2PDAAcremonium charticolaOQ211119OQ330803a
PL136L2PDAAcremonium charticolaOQ211123OQ330806a
PL137L3MEA 10%Cladosporium cladosporioidesb
PL138L3PDAPenicillium brevicompactumOQ211120OQ330764a
PL139L3CZAParengyodontium albumb
PL140L1PDACladosporium allicinumOQ211114OQ330820a
PL141L4HM 10%Parengyodontium albumb
PL142L4HM 10%UnID Fi_1d
PL143L4HM 10%UnID Fi_1d
PL144L3MEA 10%Tapesia fuscaOQ211115OQ330802c
PL145L2HM 10%Penicillium jiangxienseOQ211124OQ330765a
PL146L2MEA 10%Acremonium charticolab
PL147L1HM 10%UnID Fi_1d
PL148L1MEA 10%Aspergillus protuberusb
PL149L2MEA 10%Acremonium charticolaOQ211126OQ330807a
PL150L3CZAPenicillium brevicompactumOQ211125OQ330766a
PL151L3CZACoprinellus micaceusOQ211121OQ330804c
PL152L3MEA 10%Stachybotrys chartarumOQ211138OQ330811a
PL153L3MEA 10%Stachybotrys chartarumb
PL154L2MEA 10%Cyphellophora olivaceaOQ211128OQ330808a
PL155L2MEA 10%Parengyodontium albumb
PL156L2MEA 10%Cyphellophora olivaceaOQ211135OQ330810a
PL157L2HM 10%Aspergillus protuberusOQ211136OQ330771OQ330788a
PL158L2HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211141OQ330774OQ330798a
PL159L2HM 10%Penicillium crustosumOQ211116OQ330763a
PL160L2CZPenicillium crustosumOQ211142OQ330775a
PL161L2HM 10%Penicillium crustosumOQ211143a
PL162L2HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211131OQ330769a
PL163L2HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesb
PL164L1MEA 10%Cladosporium cladosporioidesOQ211117OQ330821a
PL165L1CZAAlternaria infectoriaOQ211140OQ330812a
PL166L2RBAspergillus protuberusOQ211148OQ330779OQ330789a
PL167L2RBAspergillus protuberusOQ211137OQ330772OQ330790a
PL168L2RBAspergillus protuberusOQ211145OQ330776OQ330791a
PL169L1RBAmycosphaerella africanaOQ211144OQ330814a
PL170L2CZAAspergillus protuberusOQ211139OQ330773OQ330792a
PL171L2CZAAspergillus protuberusOQ211147OQ330778OQ330793a
PL172L2CZAStreptomycese
PL173L2CZAStreptomycese
PL174L2MEA 10%Cyphellophora olivaceaOQ211156OQ330816a
PL175L3PDACladosporium halotoleransOQ211149OQ330823a
PL176L2PDAStreptomycese
PL177L2PDAPenicillium crustosumOQ211152OQ330781a
PL178L2PDAStreptomycese
PL179L2RBAspergillus protuberusb
PL180L1RBAmycosphaerella africanab
PL181L1HM 10%UnID Fi_1d
PL182L2HM 10%Penicillium crustosumOQ211151OQ330780a
PL183L3RBCladosporium cladosporioidesOQ211150OQ330824a
PL184L3RBCladosporium cladosporioidesb
PL185L1RBAmycosphaerella africanaOQ211154a
PL186L1RBAmycosphaerella africanaOQ211155OQ330815a
PL187L3PDAPenicillium brevicompactumOQ211153OQ330782a
PL188L3MEA 10%Penicillium crustosumOQ211162a
PL189L3CZAParengyodontium albumOQ211129OQ330809a
PL190L2MEA 10%Cyphellophora olivaceaOQ211161OQ330818a
PL191L2MEA 10%Streptomycese
PL192L2MEA 10%Streptomycese
PL193L3MEA 10%Penicillium brevicompactumOQ211163OQ330783 a
PL194L2MEA 10%Streptomycese
PL195L2MEA 10%Cyphellophora olivaceaOQ211165a
PL196L1PDACladosporium allicinumOQ211166OQ330826a
PL197L2CZAStreptomycese
PL198L2CZACyphellophora olivaceaOQ211164OQ330819a
PL199L2CZAStreptomycese
PL200L1PDAUnID Fi_2d
PL201L1MEA 10%Aspergillus protuberusOQ211127OQ330767OQ330794a
PL202L1HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211132OQ330770a
PL203L2HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211133a
PL204L3MEA 10%UnID Fi_3d
PL205L4DG18UnID Fi_1d
PL206L4DG18Cladosporium cladosporioidesOQ211168OQ330828a
PL207L1HM 10%Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211130OQ330768a
PL208L1PDAStereum hirsutumOQ211160c
PL209L3RBCladosporium cladosporioidesb
PL210L1PDAStereum hirsutumb
PL211L2RBAspergillus protuberusOQ211146OQ330777OQ330795a
PL212L2MEA 10%Stereum hirsutumOQ211157OQ330817c
PL213L2MEA 10%Diaporthe foeniculinaOQ211158a
PL214L3CZAUnID Fi_4d
PL215L1HM 10%Cladosporium sinuosumOQ211159OQ330825a
PL216L3RBUnID Fi_4 d
PL217L1HM 10%Cladosporium allicinumOQ211167OQ330827a
PL218L2CZAStreptomycese
PL219L1DG18Aspergillus penicillioidesOQ211169OQ330784OQ330799a
PL220L1PDAAspergillus protuberusOQ211170OQ330785OQ330796a
PL221L4DG18UnID Fi_1d
PL222L1PDAAspergillus protuberusOQ211171OQ330786OQ330797a
PL223L1DG18Aspergillus penicillioidesb
PL224L1PDAUnID Fi_2d
PL225L1CZATalaromyces acaricolaOQ211172OQ330787OQ330800a
PL226L1CZATalaromyces acaricolaOQ211173a
PL227L1CZATalaromyces acaricolaOQ211174OQ330801a
UnID_Fi—Unidentified isolate freezing incubation. a Morphological analysis in accordance with the molecular hypothesis. b Consensus identification obtained based on culture and morphological characteristics. c Identification based solely on molecular data. d No consensus identification obtained under further molecular and morphological characterization. e Filamentous Actinobacteria (not included in any of the analyses performed).

References

  1. Merino, N.; Aronson, H.S.; Bojanova, D.P.; Feyhl-buska, J.; Wong, M.L.; Zhang, S.; Giovannelli, D. Living at the Extremes: Extremophiles and the Limits of Life in a Planetary Context. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Onofri, S.; Selbmann, L.; De Hoog, G.S.; Grube, M.; Barreca, D.; Ruisi, S.; Zucconi, L. Evolution and adaptation of fungi at boundaries of life. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 40, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gadd, G.M. Geomicrobiology of the built environment. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 16275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dedesko, S.; Siegel, J.A. Moisture parameters and fungal communities associated with gypsum drywall in buildings. Microbiome 2015, 3, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Palmer, F.E.; Emery, D.R.; Stemmler, J.; Staley, J.T. Survival and growth of microcolonial rock fungi as affected by temperature and humidity. New Phytol. 1987, 107, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gorbushina, A.A.; Kotlova, E.R.; Sherstneva, O.A. Cellular responses of microcolonial rock fungi to long-term desiccation and subsequent rehydration. Stud. Mycol. 2008, 61, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Onofri, S.; Zucconi, l.; Isola, D.; Selbmann, L. Rock-inhabiting fungi and their role in deterioration of stone monuments in the Mediterranean area. Plant Biosyst. 2014, 148, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saiz-Jimenez, C. Deposition of anthropogenic compounds on monuments and their effect on airborne microorganisms. Aerobiologia 1995, 11, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urzì, C.; De Leo, F.; Salamone, P.; Criseo, G. Airborne fungal spores colonising marbles exposed in the terrace of Messina Museum, Sicily. Aerobiologia 2001, 17, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Polo, A.; Gulotta, D.; Santo, N.; Di Benedetto, C.; Fascio, U.; Toniolo, L.; Villa, F.; Cappitelli, F. Importance of subaerial biofilms and airborne microflora in the deterioration of stonework: A molecular study. Biofouling 2012, 28, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Leo, F.; Marchetta, A.; Urzì, C. Black Fungi on Stone-Built Heritage: Current Knowledge and Future Outlook. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Scheerer, S.; Ortega-Morales, O.; Gaylarde, C. Chapter 5 Microbial Deterioration of Stone Monuments—An Updated Overview. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 66, 97–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dakal, T.C.; Cameotra, S.S. Microbially induced deterioration of architectural heritages: Routes and mechanisms involved. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2012, 24, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gadd, G.M. Geomycology: Biogeochemical transformations of rocks, minerals, metals and radionuclides by Fungi, Bioweathering and Bioremediation. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 3–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gadd, G.M. Fungi, Rocks, and Minerals. Elements 2017, 3, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Warscheid, T.; Braams, J. Biodeterioration of stone: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2000, 46, 343–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sterflinger, K. Fungi as geologic agents. Geomicrobiol. J. 2000, 17, 97–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sterflinger, K. Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2010, 24, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Griffin, P.S.; Indictor, N.; Koestler, R.J. The biodeterioration of stone: A review of deterioration mechanisms, conservation case histories, and treatment. Int. Biodeterior. 1991, 28, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pinheiro, A.C.; Mesquita, N.; Trovão, J.; Soares, F.; Tiago, I.; Coelho, C.; Carvalho, H.P.; Gil, F.; Catarino, L.; Piñar, G.; et al. Limestone biodeterioration: A review on the portuguese cultural heritage scenario. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 36, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sterflinger, K.; Piñar, G. Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art—Tilting at windmills? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9637–9646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Adamiak, J.; Otlewska, A.; Tafer, H.; Lopandic, K.; Gutarowska, B.; Sterflinger, K.; Piñar, G. First evaluation of the microbiome of built cultural heritage by using the Ion Torrent next generation sequencing platform. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 131, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brzozowska, I.; Bogdanowicz, A.; Szczęsny, P.; Zielenkiewicz, U.; Laudy, A. Evaluation of bacterial diversity on historical silk velvet textiles from the Museum of King John III’s Palace at Wilanów, Poland. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 131, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duan, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, W.; Gu, J.D.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Chen, T.; Liu, G.; An, L. Differences of Microbial Community on the wall paintings preserved in situ and ex situ of the Tiantishan Grottoes, China. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 132, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dyda, M.; Decewicz, P.; Romaniuk, K.; Wojcieszak, M.; Sklodowska, A.; Dziewit, L.; Drewniak, L.; Laudy, A. Application of metagenomic methods for selection of an optimal growth medium for bacterial diversity analysis of microbiocenoses on historical stone surfaces. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 131, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gaylarde, C.; Ogawa, A.; Beech, I.; Kowalski, M.; Baptista-Neto, J.A. Analysis of dark crusts on the church of Nossa Senhora do Carmo in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, using chemical, microscope and metabarcoding microbial identification techniques. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 117, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kraková, L.; Šoltys, K.; Otlewska, A.; Pietrzak, K.; Purkrtová, S.; Savická, D.; Puškárová, A.; Bučková, M.; Szemes, T.; Budiš, J.; et al. Comparison of methods for identification of microbial communities in book collections: Culture-dependent (sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS) and culture-in-dependent (Illumina MiSeq). Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 131, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lepinay, C.; Mihajlovski, A.; Touron, S.; Seyer, D.; Bousta, F.; Di Martino, P. Bacterial diversity associated with saline efflorescences damaging the walls of a French decorated prehistoric cave registered as a World Cultural Heritage Site. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 130, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, M.; Fang, C.; Kawasaki, S.; Huang, M.; Achal, V. Bio-consolidation of cracks in masonry cement mortars by Acinetobacter sp. SC4 isolated from a karst cave. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 141, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lors, C.; Aube, J.; Guyoneaud, R.; Vandenbulcke, F.; Damidot, D. Biodeterioration of mortars exposed to sewers in relation to microbial diversity of biofilms formed on the mortars surface. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 130, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martins, C.; Silva Pereira, C.; Plechkova, N.V.; Seddon, K.R.; Wang, J.; Whitfield, S.; Wong, W. Mycobiota of silk faced ancient Mogao Grottoes manuscripts belonging to the Stein collection in the British library. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 134, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ogawa, A.; Celikkol-Aydin, S.; Gaylarde, C.; Baptista-Neto, J.A.; Beech, I. Microbial communities on painted wet and dry external surfaces of a historic fortress in Niterói, Brazil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 123, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Szulc, J.; Otlewska, A.; Ruman, T.; Kubiak, K.; Karbowska-Berent, J.; Kozielec, T.; Gutarowska, B. Analysis of paper foxing by newly available omics techniques. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 132, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Trovão, J.; Portugal, A.; Soares, F.; Paiva, D.S.; Mesquita, N.; Coelho, C.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Catarino, L.; Gil, F.; Tiago, I. Fungal diversity and distribution across distinct biodeterioration phenomena in limestone walls of the old cathedral of Coimbra, UNESCO World Heritage Site. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 142, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, X.; Ge, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Deng, Y.; Gu, J.D. Microbiological community of the royal palace in Angkor Thom and Beng Mealea of Cambodia by Illumina sequencing based on 16S rRNA gene. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 134, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Selbmann, L.; Stoppiello, G.A.; Onofri, S.; Stajich, J.E.; Coleine, C. Culture-Dependent and Amplicon Sequencing Approaches Reveal Diversity and Distribution of Black Fungi in Antarctic Cryptoendolithic Communities. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. González, J.M.; Sáiz-Jiménez, C. Application of molecular nucleic acid-based techniques for the study of microbial communities in monuments and artworks. Int. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Mihajlovski, A.; Seyer, D.; Benamara, H.; Bousta, F.; Di Martino, P. An overview of techniques for the characterization and quantification of microbial colonization on stone monuments. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dakal, T.C.; Arora, P.K. Evaluation of potential of molecular and physical techniques in studying biodeterioration. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio Technol. 2012, 11, 71–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sanmartín, P.; DeAraujo, A.; Vasanthakumar, A. Melding the Old with the New: Trends in Methods Used to Identify, Monitor, and Control Microorganisms on Cultural Heritage Materials. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 76, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paiva, D.S.; Fernandes, L.; Trovão, J.; Mesquita, N.; Tiago, I.; Portugal, A. Uncovering the Fungal Diversity Colonizing Limestone Walls of a Forgotten Monument in the Central Region of Portugal by High-Throughput Sequencing and Culture-Based Methods. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. de Nadal, E.; Ammerer, G.; Posas, F. Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mafart, P.; Couvert, O.; Leguérinel, I. Effect of pH on the heat resistance of spores: Comparison of two models. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 63, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Deegenaars, M.L.; Watson, K. Heat shock response in psychrophilic and psychrotrophic yeast from Antarctica. Extremophiles 1998, 2, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tesei, D.; Marzban, G.; Zakharova, K.; Isola, D.; Selbmann, L.; Sterflinger, k. Alteration of protein patterns in black rock inhabiting fungi as a response to different temperatures. Fungal Biol. 2012, 116, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Igreja Paroquial de Trofa/Igreja de São Salvador e Panteão dos Lemos. Available online: http://www.monumentos.gov.pt/Site/APP_PagesUser/SIPA.aspx?id=1042 (accessed on 29 January 2023).
  47. Miller, A.Z.; Leal, N.; Laiz, L.; Candelera, R.; Silva, M.A.; Dionisio, A.; Macedo, M.F.; Sáiz-Jiménez, C. Primary bioreceptivity of limestones used in southern European monuments. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2010, 331, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vergès-Belmin, V. ICOMOS-ISCS: Illustrated Glossary on Stone Deterioration Patterns Glossaire Illustré sur les Formes d’Altération de la Pierre; ICOMOS-MONUMENTS and SITES XV: Paris, France, 2008; ISBN 978-2-918086-00-0. [Google Scholar]
  49. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stielow, J.; Lévesque, C.; Seifert, K.; Meyer, W.; Irinyi, L.; Smits, D.; Renfurm, R.; Verkley, G.; Groenewald, M.; Chaduli, D. One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. Persoonia 2015, 35, 242–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yilmaz, N.; Visagie, C.M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Houbraken, J.; Jacobs, K.; Samson, R.A. Taxonomic re-evaluation of species in Talaromyces section Islandici, using a polyphasic approach. Persoonia 2016, 36, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hong, S.B.; Cho, H.S.; Shin, H.D.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Novel Neosartorya species isolated from soil in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bensch, K.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Braun, U.; Dijksterhuis, J.; de Jesús Yáñez-Morales, M.; Crous, P.W. Common but different: The expanding realm of Cladosporium. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 23–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Crous, P.W.; Gams, W.; Stalpers, J.A.; Robert, V.; Stegehuis, G. MycoBank: An online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Stud. Mycol. 2004, 50, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  58. Robert, V.; Stegehuis, G.; Stalpers, J. The MycoBank Engine and Related Databases. 2005. Available online: https://www.MycoBank.org/ (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  59. Hammer, O.; Harper, D.; Ryan, P. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Eevol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Trovão, J.; Tiago, I.; Soares, F.; Paiva, D.S.; Mesquita, N.; Coelho, C.; Catarino, L.; Gil, F.; Portugal, A. Description of Aeminiaceae fam. nov., Aeminium gen. nov. and Aeminium ludgeri sp. nov. (Capnodiales), isolated from a biodeteriorated art-piece in the Old Cathedral of Coimbra. MycoKeys 2019, 45, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Trovão, J.; Gil, F.; Catarino, L.; Soares, F.; Tiago, I.; Portugal, A. Analysis of fungal deterioration phenomena in the first Portuguese King tomb using a multi-analytical approach. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 149, 104933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Trovão, J.; Portugal, A. Current Knowledge on the Fungal Degradation Abilities Profiled through Biodeteriorative Plate Essays. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dylag, M.; Spychała, K.; Zielinski, J.; Łagowski, D.; Gnat, S. Update on Stachybotrys chartarum—Black Mold Perceived asToxigenic and Potentially Pathogenic to Humans. Biology 2022, 11, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Scrano, L.; Boccone, L.F.; Bufo, S.A.; Carrieri, R.; Lahoz, E.; Crescenzi, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of fungal populations possibly involved in the biological alteration of stones in historical buildings. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2012, 77, 187–195. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ponizovskaya, V.B.; Rebrikova, N.L.; Kachalkin, A.V.; Antropova, A.B.; Bilanenko, E.N.; Mokeeva, V.L. Micromycetes as Colonizers of Mineral Building Materials in Historic Monuments and Museums. Fungal Biol. 2019, 123, 290–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Isola, D.; Zucconi, L.; Cecchini, A.; Caneva, G. Dark-pigmented biodeteriogenic fungi in Etruscan hypogeal tombs: New data on their culture-dependent diversity, favoring conditions, and resistance to biocidal treatments. Fungal Biol. 2021, 125, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Trovão, J.; Tiago, I.; Catarino, L.; Gil, F.; Portugal, A. In vitro analyses of fungi and dolomitic limestone interactions: Bioreceptivity and biodeterioration assessment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 155, 105107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Savković, Ž.; Stupar, M.; Unković, N.; Ivanović, Ž.; Blagojević, J.; Vukojević, J.; Ljaljević Grbić, M. In vitro biodegradation potential of airborne Aspergilli and Penicillia. Sci. Nat. 2019, 106, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Unković, N.; Erić, S.; Šarić, K.; Stupar, M.; Savković, Ž.; Stanković, S.; Stanojević, O.; Dimkić, I.; Vukojević, J.; Ljaljević Grbić, M. Biogenesis of secondary mycogenic minerals related to wall paintings deterioration process. Micron 2017, 100, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Savković, Ž.; Unković, N.; Stupar, M.; Franković, M.; Jovanović, M.; Erić, S.; Šarić, K.; Stanković, S.; Dimkić, I.; Vukojević, J.; et al. Diversity and biodeteriorative potential of fungal dwellers on ancient stone stela. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 115, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Visagie, C.M.; Hirooka, Y.; Tanney, J.B.; Whitfield, E.; Mwange, K.; Meijer, M.; Amend, A.S.; Seifert, K.A.; Samson, R.A. Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces isolated from house dust samples collected around the world. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 78, 63–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bensch, K.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Meijer, M.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Jurjević, Ž.; Andersen, B.; Houbraken, J.; Crous, P.W.; Samson, R.A. Cladosporium species in indoor environments. Stud. Mycol. 2018, 89, 177–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Horner, W.E.; Worthan, A.G.; Morey, P.R. Air- and dustborne mycoflora in houses free of water damage and fungal growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6394–6400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Géry, A.; Rioult, J.-P.; Heutte, N.; Séguin, V.; Bonhomme, J.; Garon, D. First Characterization and Description of Aspergillus Series Versicolores in French Bioaerosols. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nazareth, S.; Gonsalves, V. Aspergillus penicillioides—A true halophile existing in hypersaline and polyhaline econiches. Ann. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zammit, G.; Sanchez-Moral, S.; Albertano, P. Bacterially mediated mineralization processes lead to biodeterioration of artworks in Maltese catacombs. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2773–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Yang, X. Role of fungi in the formation of patinas on Feilaifeng limestone, China. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 76, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Del Monte, M.; Sabbioni, C.; Zappia, G. The Origin of Calcium Oxalates on Historical Buildings, Monuments and Natural Outcrops. Sci. Total Environ. 1987, 67, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, Y.; Su, M.; Wu, F.; Gu, J.-D.; Li, J.; He, D.; Guo, Q.; Cui, H.; Zhang, Q.; Feng, H. Diversity and Composition of Culturable Microorganisms and Their Biodeterioration Potentials in the Sandstone of Beishiku Temple, China. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Aguilera-Cogley, V.A.; Berbegal, M.; Català, S.; Brentu, F.C.; Armengol, J.; Vicent, A. Characterization of Mycosphaerellaceae species associated with citrus greasy spot in Panama and Spain. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Arciuolo, R.; Santos, C.; Soares, C.; Castello, G.; Spigolon, N.; Chiusa, G.; Lima, N.; Battilani, P. Molecular Characterization of Diaporthe Species Associated with Hazelnut defects. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 611655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Chang, M.; Menga, J. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Coprinellus micaceus, a wild saprobic mushroom in China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2021, 6, 1979–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Tanney, J.B.; Seifert, K.A. Mollisiaceae: An overlooked lineage of diverse endophytes. Stud. Mycol. 2020, 95, 293–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Connell, L.; Redman, R.; Craig, S.; Scorzetti, G.; Iszard, M.; Rodriguez, R. Diversity of Soil Yeasts Isolated from South Victoria Land, Antarctica. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 56, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arenz, B.E.; Blanchette, R.A. Distribution and abundance of soil fungi in Antarctica at sites on the Peninsula, Ross Sea Region and McMurdo dry valleys. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Robinson, C.H. Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol. 2001, 151, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, M.; Jianqing, T.; Xiang, M.; Liu, X. Living strategy of cold-adapted fungi with the reference to several representative species. Mycology 2017, 8, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tesei, D. Black Fungi Research: Out-of-This-World Implications. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Blanchette, R.A.; Held, B.W.; Jurgens, J.A.; McNew, D.L.; Harrington, T.C.; Duncan, S.M.; Farrell, R.L. Wood destroying soft-rot fungi in the historic expedition huts of Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1328–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ludley, K.E.; Robinson, C.H. Decomposer, Basidiomycota in Arctic and Antarctic ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hossain, M.A.; Ahmed, M.S.; Ghannoum, M.A. Attributes of Stachybotrys chartarum and Its Association with Human Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 113, 200–208; Quiz 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Choudhry, H.; Asseri, A.H.; Elfaky, M.A.; Mohamed, S.G.A.; Mohamed, G.A. Stachybotrys chartarum—A Hidden Treasure: Secondary Metabolites, Bioactivities, and Biotechnological Relevance. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ruisi, S.; Barreca, D.; Selbmann, L.; Zucconi, L.; Onofri, S. Fungi in Antarctica. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gostinčar, G.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. No need for speed: Slow development of fungi in extreme environments. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2022, 39, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sterflinger, K. Temperature and NaCl- tolerance of rock-inhabiting meristematic fungi. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1998, 74, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Macroscopic observations of some representatives of the fungal isolates obtained in this study on PDA medium: (A,I) Cladosporium allicinum. (B) Penicillium crustosum. (C,E,L,O) Aspergillus protuberus. (D) Stachybotrys chartarum. (F) Tapesia fusca. (G) Parengyodontium album. (H) Cladosporium cladosporioides. (J,Q) Cyphellophora olivacea. (K,M) Acremonium charticola. (N) Cladosporium sinuosum. (P) Penicillium brevicompactum. (R) Stereum hirsutum. (S) Filamentous Actinobacteria (fungus-like bacteria).
Figure 1. Macroscopic observations of some representatives of the fungal isolates obtained in this study on PDA medium: (A,I) Cladosporium allicinum. (B) Penicillium crustosum. (C,E,L,O) Aspergillus protuberus. (D) Stachybotrys chartarum. (F) Tapesia fusca. (G) Parengyodontium album. (H) Cladosporium cladosporioides. (J,Q) Cyphellophora olivacea. (K,M) Acremonium charticola. (N) Cladosporium sinuosum. (P) Penicillium brevicompactum. (R) Stereum hirsutum. (S) Filamentous Actinobacteria (fungus-like bacteria).
Jof 09 00501 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagram showing the number of shared and exclusive species between samples.
Figure 2. Venn diagram showing the number of shared and exclusive species between samples.
Jof 09 00501 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundance of the cultivable fungal diversity of all four sampling sites.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of the cultivable fungal diversity of all four sampling sites.
Jof 09 00501 g003
Figure 4. The appearance of the Aspergillus penicillioides colony on HM 10% medium, after maturation (gray mycelium), displaying precipitated crystals. (A) Direct visualization of the culture plate. (B) Observed under the light microscope (100×). (C) Observed under the light microscope (400×).
Figure 4. The appearance of the Aspergillus penicillioides colony on HM 10% medium, after maturation (gray mycelium), displaying precipitated crystals. (A) Direct visualization of the culture plate. (B) Observed under the light microscope (100×). (C) Observed under the light microscope (400×).
Jof 09 00501 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic trees (generated using maximum likelihood with the Kimura two-parameters model using a Gamma distribution (+G)) showing the genetic diversity among the ITS rDNA sequences of isolated fungi, obtained from: (A) standard freezing incubation; and (B) direct plating.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic trees (generated using maximum likelihood with the Kimura two-parameters model using a Gamma distribution (+G)) showing the genetic diversity among the ITS rDNA sequences of isolated fungi, obtained from: (A) standard freezing incubation; and (B) direct plating.
Jof 09 00501 g005
Figure 6. Variations in the relative abundance of shared taxa were obtained from both methods: (A) standard freezing incubation; and (B) direct plating.
Figure 6. Variations in the relative abundance of shared taxa were obtained from both methods: (A) standard freezing incubation; and (B) direct plating.
Jof 09 00501 g006
Figure 7. Differences in fungal isolates retrieved from the different culture media used for fungal isolation in this study. (A) The number of unique taxa isolated from each medium. (B) Overlap of cultivable species among the different culture media.
Figure 7. Differences in fungal isolates retrieved from the different culture media used for fungal isolation in this study. (A) The number of unique taxa isolated from each medium. (B) Overlap of cultivable species among the different culture media.
Jof 09 00501 g007
Table 1. Primers used for fungal isolates identification.
Table 1. Primers used for fungal isolates identification.
LocusPrimersSequence (5′-3′)Annealing (°C)Amplification/CyclesLength (bp)GroupReference
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS)ITS1F
ITS4
ctt ggt cat tta gag gaa gta a
tcc tcc gct tat tga tat gc
52Standard
35
~600All Fungi [49]
Translation elongation factor 1α (Tef1)EF1-1018F
EF1-1620R
gay ttc atc aag aac atg at
gac gtt gaa dcc rac rtt gtc
56Touchdown
36
~600All Fungi * [50]
β-tubulin (BenA)Bt2a
Bt2b
ggt aac caa atc ggt gct gct ttc
acc ctc agt gta gtg acc ctt ggc
55Standard
35
~500Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces [51,52]
Calmodulin (CaM)CMD5
CMD6
ccg agt aca agg agg cct tc
ccg ata gag gtc ata acg tgg
55Standard
35
~580Aspergillus and Talaromyces [52,53]
Partial Actin (Act)Act-512F
Act-783R
atg tgc aag gcc ggt ttc gc
tac gag tcc ttc tgg ccc at
55Standard
35
~370Cladosporium [54,55]
* Used as a second barcode marker for all genera not specified in the table.
Table 2. Diversity indices for cultivable fungal diversity after standard freezing incubation. The highest and lowest values are highlighted for reference.
Table 2. Diversity indices for cultivable fungal diversity after standard freezing incubation. The highest and lowest values are highlighted for reference.
Sample IDSpecies Richness (S)Shannon (H)Evenness (e^H/S)Dominance (D)
L1111.770.530.22
L291.390.440.29
L3101.270.350.37
L430.530.560.73
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paiva, D.S.; Fernandes, L.; Pereira, E.; Trovão, J.; Mesquita, N.; Tiago, I.; Portugal, A. Exploring Differences in Culturable Fungal Diversity Using Standard Freezing Incubation—A Case Study in the Limestones of Lemos Pantheon (Portugal). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040501

AMA Style

Paiva DS, Fernandes L, Pereira E, Trovão J, Mesquita N, Tiago I, Portugal A. Exploring Differences in Culturable Fungal Diversity Using Standard Freezing Incubation—A Case Study in the Limestones of Lemos Pantheon (Portugal). Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(4):501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paiva, Diana S., Luís Fernandes, Emília Pereira, João Trovão, Nuno Mesquita, Igor Tiago, and António Portugal. 2023. "Exploring Differences in Culturable Fungal Diversity Using Standard Freezing Incubation—A Case Study in the Limestones of Lemos Pantheon (Portugal)" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 4: 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop