Next Article in Journal
A New Species Agrocybe striatipes, also a Newly Commercially Cultivated Mushroom with Highly Nutritional and Healthy Values
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Manifestations of Human Exposure to Fungi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Feasibility Study on the Recall of Metallophilic Fungi from Fe(III)-Contaminated Soil and Evaluating Their Mycoremediation Capacity: Experimental and Theoretical Study

1
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
2
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(3), 382; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030382
Submission received: 27 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental and Ecological Interactions of Fungi)

Abstract

:
Mycoremediation is one of the most attractive, eco-friendly, and sustainable methods to mitigate the toxic effects of heavy metals. This study aimed to determine the mycoremediation capacity of metallophilic fungi isolated from heavy-metal-contaminated soil containing a high Fe(III) concentration (118.40 mg/kg). Four common fungal strains were isolated, including Curvularia lunata, Fusarium equiseti, Penicillium pinophilum, and Trichoderma harzianum. These fungal strains were exposed to gradually increasing concentrations of Fe(III) of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1000 mg/L. Sophisticated techniques and tests were employed to investigate the mycoremediation capability, including tolerance index (TI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and adsorption isotherm. Furthermore, the impacts of initial concentration, pH, and temperature on the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake capacity (mg/g) of the studied samples were investigated. The results were validated by statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA. It was found that the Fe(III) uptake with different ratios triggered alterations in the Fe(III) tolerance (TI) morphological (SEM), chemical (FTIR), and adsorption capacity properties. The highest Fe(III) tolerance for all studied fungal strains was achieved at 100 mg/L. Moreover, the optimum conditions of Fe(III) removal (%) for all studied fungal strains were within pH 7 and 28 °C, with similar performance at the initial Fe(III) concentration ranging from 50–200 mg/L. At the same time, the maximum Fe(III) uptake was achieved at pH 7, 20 °C, and 200 mg/L. Compared to other strains, the Fe(III) tolerance of T. harzianum was rise in the Fe(III) concentration. The Fe(III) uptake reaction was corroborated by best fitting with the Langmuir model, achieving optimum adsorption capacities of 61.34, 62.90, 63.30, and 72.46 mg/g for C.lunata, F. equiseti, P. pinophilum, T. harzianum, respectively. It can be deduced that the addressed fungi species can be applied in mycoremediation according to the utilized Fe(III) concentrations with more superiority for live T. harzianum.

1. Introduction

Environmental pollution is one of the most critical problems of the twenty-first century [1]. Soil contamination is one of the different forms of environmental pollution. Soil pollution is caused by the aggregation of high concentrations of toxic compounds, chemicals, salts, radioactive materials, or disease-causing agents that endanger the health of plants and animals [2]. Various chemicals or heavy metals can contaminate soil through agricultural and industrial activities. Due to soil contamination, microorganisms, aquatic life, humans, and animals are at risk. Immense industries are the most common sources of heavy metal contaminations of the soil, including cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, nickel, and zinc [3]. These heavy metals can trigger serious health problems, such as skin irritation, organ damage, nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal issues, and various types of cancer [4].
Iron (Fe(III)), is one of the essential nutrients in plant nutrient cycling and primary mineral weathering [5]; however, it can be toxic in large quantities or under specific formulas. Fe(III) is one of the most common and poisonous heavy metals; it pollutes the soil and causes hazards to biodiversity, agricultural productivity, food safety, and human health when transported through the food chain [6]. However, two processes can describe the removal of such heavy metals from the soil by the live organisms: bioaccumulation and biosorption. Bioaccumulation is an active metabolic uptake process driven by energy from the living organism (e.g., fungi), in which the heavy metals accumulate inside the cell wall (i.e., intracellular binding) [7,8]. On the other hand, biosorption occurs when heavy metals are adsorbed on the cell wall (i.e., extracellular binding). This process can be defined as a fast and passive metabolic process independent of energy in which biological materials (e.g., fungal biomass) act as sorbents that can remove pollutants, such as heavy metals, from wastewater through metabolically mediated or physico–chemical pathways of uptake [8,9]. This process includes mechanisms such as redox, precipitation, electrostatic interaction, physisorption, and ion exchange, as shown in Figure 1.
Mycoremediation is a method of bioremediation in which fungi-based remediation methods are applied to neutralize or remove heavy metals and textile dyes from the environment [10]. Additionally, it is a type of bioleaching remediation that is simple in operation, costless, and biodegradable. Mycoremediation is a novel and promising remediation technology that can be applied to heavy-metal-polluted soils. Therefore, scientists are currently investigating mycoremediation methods that use microbial and associated biota (i.e., fungi) within the ecosystem to biodegrade, collect, and eliminate the contaminants [11]. Hence, the soil (as a part of the ecosystem) is privileged because it contains all main groups of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi [12]. The microbiota of soil (i.e., bacteria, fungi, and algae) plays an essential role in the degradation and synthesis of organic compounds. Metallophilic fungi are particular fungi that can be isolated from these heavy-metal-polluted soils [13]. These fungi are characterized by their ability to adapt to heavy metals and environmental conditions. The metallophilic fungal tolerance to Fe(III) has been attributed to numerous methods, including metal capture by cell wall components, precipitation by extracellular metabolites, and intracellular complexing by metallothioneins and phytochelatins [14].
Consequently, recent studies have investigated how to isolate species of those fungal strains, which remove heavy metals from different environmental resources such as soil. To the best of our knowledge, bioremediation by these metallophilic fungi has not previously been appointed in iron remediation. Consequently, the current study aims to identify the diversity of these metallophilic fungi present in Fe(III)-contaminated soils and determine their tolerance index at different Fe(III) concentrations. This was conducted through the isolation and characterization of different metallophilic fungal types by employing macroscopic characterization, metal tolerance index (TI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Meanwhile, Fe(III) adsorption experiments accompanied by their isotherm studies were carried out to evaluate the adsorption capacity of these fungal species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Collection and Characterization

2.1.1. Soil Collection and Preparation

Soil samples were collected from Bayad Al Arab, an industrial area in East Beni Suef city, Egypt. samples were compiled by plowing the soil layers (0–20 cm) with a sharp-edged plastic spatula from different areas separated by 10–20 m. Then, the soil sample was stored in sterile plastic bags and transferred cautiously to the Microbiology Research Laboratory at the Department of Botany and Microbiology, Beni-Suef University, for further preparation and analysis. Ten soil samples were collected from industrial effluent in plastic bags using a hand trowel at a depth of 20–40 cm. The samples were mixed, and the representative sample was taken and stored for microbial culturing and characterization within 24 h of the collection. The sample was air dried in laboratory conditions for 14 days to obtain a constant mass. The sample was then dried at 75 °C in a hot-air oven and preserved in the desiccator. After that, the sample was ground in a porcelain mortar and sieved through a 2 mm sieve to turn them into fine grains and remove any contaminants of large particles. The sample was then kept in plastic bags for further analysis.

2.1.2. Soil Characterization

pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, soil texture, moisture content, and available nutrients (N, P, K, and Fe(III)) were determined. Soil pH was measured in a 1:2.5 aqueous soil extract using a pH meter model (AD8000), whereas electrical conductivity was determined in a 1:5 aqueous soil extract using a conductivity meter (model AD8000). Soil texture was measured by the pipette method according to Olmstead et al. [14]. According to a standard protocol, to determine the available nitrogen content in the soil sample, 5 g of soil was shaken with 50 mL of KCl (2 M) for 30 min, with the moisture content of the soil being determined by Su et al. [15]. The solution was filtered, and the sum of NH4+ and NO3 was measured following the method of Allen et al. [16]. Other available nutrients, including P and K, were determined according to the practices described by Soltanpour and Schwab [17]. Organic carbon was determined based on the method described in [18]. The total Fe(III) concentration was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Agilent 240 FS AA).

2.2. Isolation and Characterization of Metallophilic Fungi

2.2.1. Metallophilic Fungi Isolation

To isolate the fungal strains, 3 g of soil samples was dissolved in 200 mL of sterilized distilled water. The suspension was then serially diluted 10–1000 times at room temperature in a shaking incubator with a shaker at 100 rpm. To inhibit the bacterial growth in the media, the samples were added to 30 mg/L of streptomycin in Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Merck KGaA®, Darmstadt, Germany). A total of 100 mL of the dilution was added, and the media was poured into Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter). After media solidification, the plates were placed in an incubator at 28 °C in dark conditions and checked daily for 6 days. The growth of different fungal species was observed after 4 days [19]. Each prepared colony was subcultured and preserved on 2% PDA plates at 25 °C ± 2 °C and then stored at 5 °C.

2.2.2. Fungal Characterization

The fungal species used and the different tests conducted in this study were characterized by employing several experiments, including macroscopic characterization, metal tolerance index (TI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).

Macroscopic Characterization

For the macroscopic characterization, each isolated strain was separated on fresh PDA plates with 100 mg/L of Fe(III) adjusted to a pH of 5.5 to 5.7 by incorporating FeCl3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany).

Tolerance Index (TI)

Relating to the metal tolerance characterization, the tolerance index (TI) is defined as the ratio of the treated colony radial growth rate incorporated with Fe(III) to that of control of the same fungal isolate without Fe(III) incorporation. The potential of Fe(III) tolerance of the fungal colonies in the test medium was measured according to Equation (1).
Τ I = Dt Du
where TI is the tolerance index, Dt is the plate radial diameter (mm) treated with Fe(III), and Du is the untreated plate radial diameter (mm).
The tolerance to Fe(III) of the fungi was evaluated as follows: 0.00–0.39 (very low), 0.49–0.59 (low), 0.60–0.79 (moderate), 0.80–0.99 (high), and ≥1 (very high) [20]. The tolerant strains were cultivated in various concentrations of Fe(III), including 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1000 mg/L of Fe(III). This was conducted through the incorporation of FeCl3.6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in PDA media. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for both the control and each metal concentration. After 7 days, fungal discs of 3 mm size were inoculated onto the PDA media at 27 °C, while the media without Fe(III) served as control. After 7 days, the mycelium discs (3 mm diameter) were separately inoculated from the pure cultures, after which the plates were incubated for equal days with monitoring of the radial growth of the mycelium at the same temperature.

Colony Morphology

After fungi colony cultivation, as previously mentioned, macroscopic characteristics, colony color, colony texture, medium changes, and pigment formation were described. The colony diameters were also photographed after 7 days at 27 °C. For each colony, the average of two perpendicular diameters was calculated. The names of colors were referenced by Ridgway [21].

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The dried fungal biomass was evaluated before and after the contact with Fe(III) solutions. After that, the dried fungal biomass was coated with an about 15 nm thickness of gold under vacuum to enhance conductivity, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6510 LA, JEOL, Japan) was employed at 20 kV to determine the morphological modifications that occurred to the fungal mycelia due to Fe(III) addition.

Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Based on the absorption bands at definite frequencies, FTIR is an effective technique for identifying the functional groups of specific biopolymers (e.g., proteins, carbohydrates, and cellulose) [22]. Powdered T. harzianum was nominated to be examined by FTIR based on the tolerance index value, for which it had the highest values. It is known that all addressed fungi have the same functional groups; thus, the powder from stalks of champignon was evaluated before contact with the Fe(III) solutions. In this study, operating the usual spectral resolution at the usual spectral resolution of 4 cm−1, the FTIR technique (VERTEX 70, Bruker, Germany) was used to determine the changes in the functional groups of isolated fungi in the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1, due to the addition of different Fe(III) concentrations.

2.3. Experimental Work of Adsorption

2.3.1. Adsorption Experiments

Different concentrations of FeCl3.6H2O (50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/L) were added to potato dextrose broth to evaluate the adsorption capacity (also known as biosorption) of the fungus before the specific fungi were inoculated. As for the effect of pH on the fungal uptake capacity, the fungi cultures were inoculated on media with 200 mg/L of FeCl3·6H2O, which was adjusted with aqueous HCl and aqueous NaOH to obtain pH values ranging from 3 to 8. The effect of temperature was also studied by incubating the cultures in FeCl3·6H2O with pH 7 and a concentration of 200 mg/L at 20, 28, and 37 °C. Then, the filtrate from each previous experiment was obtained and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry to determine its Fe(III) concentration. Next, the biomass of the fungi harvested after filtration was washed with distilled water. Afterward, the biomass was dried overnight in a hot air oven at 80 °C and weighed again. The Fe(III) uptake capacity (qe, mg/g) and Fe(III) removal percentage R (%) were measured by Equations (2) and (3), respectively:
qe = ( C 0 C F ) V M
R ( % ) = C 0 C F C 0 × 100
where C0 represents the initial concentration of Fe(III) (mg/L), CF indicates the final concentration of Fe(III) (mg/L), V (L) is the aqueous medium volume, and M is the dry weight of fungal biomass (g).

2.3.2. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherm is the first experimental test used to determine whether adsorption is feasible and whether additional test work is required. An equilibrium test provides information linking the amount of adsorbate still in the solution to the amount of adsorbate that was desorbed per unit weight. Adsorption data were reported by adsorption isotherms, such as the Langmuir or Freundlich isotherms, for a wide range of Fe(III) ion concentrations (adsorbate) (50–200 g/1000 mL). The Langmuir and Freundlich models are provided in (Table 1). According to the Langmuir model, maximum adsorption occurs when a saturated monolayer of solute molecules covers the adsorption surface, the adsorption energy is constant, and there is no adsorbate molecule migration in the surface plane. The Langmuir isotherm model expounds on the monolayer adsorption process at the homogeneous interface [23]. The Freundlich isotherm model illustrates the multilayer adsorption at the heterogeneous interface [24]. The Freundlich model is essentially empirical. Therefore, the model is a helpful tool for describing data.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data presented are the average results of three separate experiments, each of which was performed in triplicate. Version 8.0 of GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analysis and graphic representation. The Tukey test calculated one-way ANOVA and the mean differences between the samples. p values that were less than 0.05 were regarded as significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soil Characterization

The mean values of soil analyses are determined in association with standard deviations (SD) and listed in Table 2. The soil pH range was 7.38, indicating that the soil is almost neutral with a slight tendency toward alkalinity. As for the electrical conductivity (EC), the soil sample has a high EC value (25.30 mS/m). This can be attributed to the high concentration of salts in the soil and heavy metal accumulation [27]. The organic matter content of the contaminated soil sample is 0.33%, with a sandy loam texture, and the moisture content is 2%. This result can be attributed to the low concentration of clay in the soil sample. Available nutrient concentrations in soil are represented by nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) with mean values of 16, 8, and 10.35 mg/kg, respectively, with SD values ranging from 0.05–0.40. Fe(III) was detected in a high concentration (118.40 mg/kg), above the ISI permissible limits for industrial effluents. This can result from long-term irrigation with industrial effluents [28]. This high concentration of Fe(III) can be a problematic issue in the efficiency of the nutrient cycle due to the reduction in the waste breakdown and nitrogen fixation [29].

3.2. Isolation and Characterization of Metallophilic Fungi

3.2.1. Macroscopic Characterization

From the contaminated soil sample, varieties of metallophilic fungi, such as Curvularia lunata, Fusarium equiseti, Penicillium pinophilum, and Trichoderma harzianum, were isolated. These species have a high resistance to heavy metals [30]. Table 3 illustrates the macroscopic characteristics of these isolated fungi.

3.2.2. Tolerance Index (TI)

The TI values of all isolated fungi are < 1 with different ratios ranging from 0.35 to 0.98, which depend on the difference in the tolerance behavior of each fungus, which can be observed from the presence of filamentous fungi in contaminated sites (Figure 2). These differences can be attributed to the different tolerance mechanisms of these microorganisms to metal contaminants [31]. Figure 2 shows the highest Fe(III) tolerance values in all experienced Fe(III) concentrations (100–1000 mg/L). Unlike P. pinophilum, T. harzianum species can resist and detoxify Fe(III) pollutants even with higher concentrations (i.e., 800–1000 mg/L). More specifically, the change in the Fe(III) tolerance of T. harzianum is limited at all Fe(III) concentrations, even at the highest values.

3.2.3. Colony Morphology

The results of the radial growth diameters and morphological characteristics are illustrated in Figure 3. The C. lunata colony is wrinkled in the case of the Fe(III)-supplemented media (Figure 3a). The pink color mycelia of F. equiseti changed to white, and the growth of the fungus was reduced in the Fe(III)-supplemented media (Figure 3b). A possible explanation for these changes in the colony color and growth rate can be due to the detoxification mechanisms of heavy metals [32]. P. pinophilum is accompanied by a white color around the colony in the media supplemented with Fe(III) (Figure 3c). This can be due to an adaptation period during which Penicillium cells produce enzymes required for Fe(III) uptake [33]. Green colonies of T. harzianum mycelia turned dark green with orange pigmentation along the edges (Figure 3d). This can be attributed to the pigment production and metal ion chelation on the fungal cell wall [34]. Compared to other fungal strains, T. harzianum has the highest radial growth, signifying the highest Fe(III) tolerance.

3.2.4. SEM Analysis

SEM images (Figure 4) illustrate alterations in the morphological features of isolated fungi after the uptake of Fe(III). Figure 4a exhibits a regular and smooth surface of the mycelia of F. equiseti in the normal status without Fe(III) uptake. Fe(III) precipitate is observed on the mycelial surface of F. equiseti due to the Fe(III) bioaccumulation, reflecting the rough surface morphology of these mycelia (Figure 4b). This can be attributed to effective potential biosorption sites on the mycelia surfaces [35]. Furthermore, the bioaccumulation of Fe(III) produces changes in the morphological features of fungi represented in mycelial looping and twisting of P. pinophilum (Figure 4c) and small irregular folds on the T. harzianum hyphae (Figure 4d). All previous alterations are destructive changes with different grades that occur to the mycelia due to the penetration of Fe(III) into the cell wall. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies [36].

3.2.5. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of the T. harzianum before and after Fe(III) uptake are shown in Figure 5. Generally, negatively charged functional groups, such as hydroxyl, amino, carboxyl, phosphate, nitro, and halide groups, provide the electrostatic force required for binding positively charged Fe(III) to the cell surface [37]. The two spectra have some similarities in their profile. The broad band at 3322–3379 cm−1 is related to the −NH2 and O−H present in carbohydrates or proteins, −NH stretching of amine (protein), and the acetamido group (chitin) [38]. Comparing the two FTIR spectra, a pronounced depletion in this band indicates that the O−H and N−H groups are bound with Fe (III). The presence of a peak at 2925 cm−1 is related to the C−H vibration group [39], which has lower intensity after Fe(III) uptake, indicating the role of C−H. The band at 2170 cm−1 is reduced in the case of Fe(III) uptake, signifying that C−H, C=O, and C=N contribute to Fe(III) adsorption. Loss of the band in the Fe(III)-laden biomass compared to the band at 1740 cm−1 in the case of raw biomass implies the role of C=O stretching vibration in carboxylates of acidic polysaccharides in the metal uptake [39]. In the raw biomass, the band at 1640 cm−1 is extinct in the case of F(III)-loaded biomass. This signifies that N−acetyl glucosamine or O−H stretching vibration (i.e., polymer of the protein–peptide bond) has significant support in Fe(III) treatment [40]. The disappearance of peaks at 1460 cm−1 at the Fe(III)-loaded sample indicates the role of methylene/alcohol groups (C−H, O−H bending) in the Fe(III) uptake [41]. The peaks at 1039 cm−1 belonged to the C–C, C=C, C–O–C, and C–O–P groups of polysaccharides [41]. This peak disappears in the Fe(III)-loaded sample, indicating the potential of these groups in Fe(III) uptake. The bands less than 1000 cm−1 concern the fingerprint zone of phosphate and sulfur groups. The decrease in the peak intensity at 617 and 705 cm−1 in the metal-loaded strain is attributed to the C−H effect [41]. Moreover, there are noticeable changes in these bands when Fe(III) uptake occurs, signifying that these bands are affected by Fe(III) adsorption. The previous Fe(III) uptake represents a type of biosorption process.

3.3. Adsorption Studies

3.3.1. Effect of Initial Fe(III) Concentration

The effect of initial Fe(III) concentration on adsorption is depicted in Figure 6. The results show that Fe(III) removal (%) increases from 81.25% to 87.50% with the increase in Fe(III) concentration from 50 to 200 mg/L (Figure 6a). Therefore, the Fe(III) removal (%) has an almost similar behavior with minor differences at all initial Fe(III) concentrations, including 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/L. A possible explanation for this increase can be explained in that this initial Fe(III) concentration can provide the necessary driving force to overcome resistance to Fe(III) ions transfer between aqueous and solid phases [42]. When the initial concentration is low, there are plenty of available adsorption sites, and adsorption can reach equilibrium quickly [43]. In the same Fe(III) concentration range, the findings show that the Fe(III) uptake capacity increased gradually from 10.97 to 62.8 mg/g from 50–200 mg/L, with the highest value at 200 mg/L (Figure 6b). These outcomes can be attributed to the fact that high Fe(III) concentrations can enhance the interaction of Fe(III) ions with biomass, resulting in a higher Fe(III) uptake capacity [44].

3.3.2. Effect of pH

Fe(III) is a cationic metal with a surface charge of positively charged ions. The Coulombic interaction between positively charged Fe(III) and negatively charged adsorbents can explain why it is more readily adsorbed in acidic environments [45]. As shown in Figure 7a, when the initial pH of the solution lies in the range of 3–7, all isolated fungi perform well in Fe(III) removal (%). More specifically, Fe(III) removal (%) of all fungal strains exceeded 80%. On the other hand, the Fe(III) removal (%) decreases for all isolated fungi at pH 8. As the pH rises, the fungal uptake capacity increases until reaching pH 8 (Figure 7b). Notably, the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake capacity (mg/g) have almost the highest values for all fungal strains at pH values of 3 and 7, with more superiority for the second (i.e., pH 7). Although it is supposed that pH 7 is similar to pH 8 in terms of having the same deleterious impact on the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake capacity (mg/g), this does not occur. The unfamiliar behavior at pH 7 can be confirmed by the values of Fe(III) uptake by P. pinophilum, and T. harzianum, which are equal to 64.28 and 60 mg/g, respectively. This can be attributed to the fact that the fungal strains turn the pH of the medium into acidic status as a result of their secretion of organic acids, including citric, gluconic, malic, itaconic, lactic, and fumaric acids [46]. This was validated by measuring the pH of the medium solution, which is assumed to be 7. However, it was measured and found to be closer to 3 after adsorption. These excreted organic acids not only have an effect on the pH, but also a positive effect on the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake capacity (mg/g). Hence, there is a difference in the behavior of Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake capacity (mg/g) between the two values of pH (i.e., 3 and 7). This low pH triggers the protonation of binding sites on the microbial surface, thus imparting a negative charge and promoting Fe(III) binding on the microbial surface. On the other hand, the reduced uptake of F(III) ions at pH 8 might be attributed to the accumulation of metal ions inside the cell walls or cells by a combined sorption microprecipitation mechanism [47].

3.3.3. Effect of Temperature

It was found that the temperature significantly impacts the biosorption process. At the temperature values of 20 and 28 °C, the Fe(III) removal (%) of fungal strains increases during the temperature increase, reaching a maximum value at 28 °C (Figure 8a). At 37 °C, the Fe(III) removal (%) has the lowest value. At 28 °C, F. equiseti has the highest Fe(III) removal (89.5%). Regarding the Fe(III) uptake (mg/g), it decreases gradually from 20 to 37 °C, respectively, and is the highest at 20 °C. More specifically, T. harzianum has a maximum Fe(III) uptake of approximately 51.5 mg/g at 20 °C. The findings prove that various fungi have a wide range of temperature adaptability. However, the effect of extremely low- (i.e., under 20 °C) and high-temperature ranges (i.e., above 37 °C) was not investigated for the fungal growth. This can be attributed to the detrimental effect of these temperature ranges on microbial metabolic rates, metal reductase synthesis, and other active materials in the fungal cells [48]. These findings are consistent with previously reported results [35].

3.4. Adsorption Isotherm of Fe(III)

Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption models applied for the adsorption of Fe(III) ions, respectively. A plot between 1/qe and 1/Ce yields a linear form of Langmuir isotherm. Similarly, the graph plotted between log qe and log Ce yields a linear form for the Freundlich isotherm. Mathematical description and isotherm constants were determined to compare the adsorption capacities of Fe(III) ions for the addressed species. The results have a high value of the correlation coefficients (R2) ranging from 0.93–0.98, signifying the adsorption results are the best fit in both the Langmuir model and Freundlich model, with more superiority for the first (Table 4). The high values of Langmuir constants, including qmax and KL, range from 61.34–72.46 (mg/g) and 0.0390–0.0260 (L/mg), respectively. While the Freundlich constants, including KF and n, range between 4.20–5.60 mg/g and 1.80–2.20 L/mg, respectively. Unlike C. lunata, the highest values of Langmuir constants, qmax (72.46 mg/g) and KL (0.0260 L/mg), and Freundlich constants, KF (5.60 mg/g and n (2.20 L/mg), are recorded for T. harzianum, indicating the highest adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively. This is validated by the highest R2 values of 0.94 and 0.95 for Langmuir and Freundlich, respectively (Table 4). Generally, the low absorption efficiency, as observed from the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake (mg/g), of these live fungal strains is due to their active cellular metabolism, which inhibits the biosorption process.

4. Conclusions

Based on the results mentioned above, the following deductions can be addressed as follows:
(1)
Four fungal species, including C.lunata, F. equiseti, P. pinophilum, and T. harzianum, were successfully isolated from contaminated soil.
(2)
The greatest Fe(III) tolerance was achieved for all fungal strains at 100 mg/L. Unlike P. pinophilum, the differences in Fe(III) tolerance of T. harzianum were limited at all Fe(III) concentrations, even at the highest values.
(3)
The morphological characterization by SEM found that there were efficient potential sites of biosorption on the mycelia surfaces responsible for Fe(III) bioaccumulation. Additionally, the Fe(III) bioaccumulation initiated changes in the morphological features of fungi, which can be observed in mycelial looping and twisting and small irregular folds.
(4)
Similarly, the Fe(III) removal (%) had the best performance of all experienced initial Fe(III) concentrations, including 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/L for all studied samples. Meanwhile, the Fe(III) uptake (mg/g) gradually increased with the rising in the initial Fe(III) concentration from 50–200 mg/L to the highest at 200 mg/L.
(5)
For all addressed fungal strains, the pH values of 3 and 7 were found to be the optimum conditions with more superiority for the first value for Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake (mg/g). Regarding the temperature, the Fe(III) removal (%) and uptake (mg/g) had the best behavior at 28 and 20 °C, respectively. More specifically, at 28 °C, F. equiseti has the highest Fe(III) removal (89.5%), while the Fe(III) uptake (mg/g) decreases gradually from 20 to 37 °C, respectively, and was the highest at 20 °C. More specifically, T. harzianum has a maximum Fe(III) uptake of approximately 51.5 mg/g at 20 °C.
(6)
Unlike C. lunata, the highest values of Langmuir constants, qmax (72.46 mg/g) and KL (0.0260 L/mg), and Freundlich constants, KF (5.60 mg/g and n (2.20 L/mg), m were reported for T. harzianum, indicating the highest adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively.

Author Contributions

Methodology, A.I.T. and M.M.Y.; software, M.M.Y.; validation, A.M.M. and M.A.M.; formal analysis, M.M.Y.; investigation, A.I.T.; data curation, M.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.T. and M.A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M.M. and W.N.H.; visualization, A.M.M.; supervision, D.H.M.A.; project administration, D.H.M.A. and W.N.H.; funding acquisition, D.H.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R15), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data available through the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mubarak, M.F.; Zayed, A.M.; Ahmed, H.A. Activated Carbon/Carborundum@Microcrystalline Cellulose core shell nano-composite: Synthesis, characterization and application for heavy metals adsorption from aqueous solutions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Correia, A.A.; Matos, M.P.; Gomes, A.R.; Rasteiro, M.G. Immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soils—Performance assessment in conditions similar to a real scenario. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmadpour, P.; Ahmadpour, F.; Mahmud, T.; Abdu, A.; Soleimani, M.; Tayefeh, F.H. Phytoremediation of heavy metals: A green technology. AJB 2012, 11, 14036–14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Freitas, H. Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Andrino, A.; Guggenberger, G.; Sauheitl, L.; Burkart, S.; Boy, J. Carbon investment into mobilization of mineral and organic phosphorus by arbuscular mycorrhiza. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2021, 57, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Talukdar, S.; Singha, P.; Mahato, S.; Pal, S.; Liou, Y.-A.; Rahman, A. Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Filote, C.; Roșca, M.; Hlihor, R.M.; Cozma, P.; Simion, I.M.; Apostol, M.; Gavrilescu, M. Sustainable Application of Biosorption and Bioaccumulation of Persistent Pollutants in Wastewater Treatment: Current Practice. Processes 2021, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Flouty, R.; Estephane, G. Bioaccumulation and biosorption of copper and lead by a unicellular algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in single and binary metal systems: A comparative study. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hansda, A.; Kumar, V.; Anshumali. A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kulshreshtha, S.; Mathur, N.; Bhatnagar, P. Mushroom as a product and their role in mycoremediation. AMB Express 2014, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yadav, M.; Singh, G.; Jadeja, R. Physical and chemical methods for heavy metal removal. Pollut. Water Manag. Resour. Strateg. Scarcity 2021, 245, 377–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bünemann, E.K.; Smernik, R.J.; Doolette, A.L.; Marschner, P.; Stonor, R.; Wakelin, S.A.; McNeill, A.M. Forms of phosphorus in bacteria and fungi isolated from two Australian soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1908–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ojuederie, O.B.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Olmstead, L.B.; Alexander, L.T.; Middleton, H.E. A Pipette Method of Mechanical Analysis of Soils Based on Improved Dispersion Procedure; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1930. [Google Scholar]
  15. SU, S.L.; Singh, D.N.; Baghini, M.S. A critical review of soil moisture measurement. Measurement 2014, 54, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Allen, S.; Grimshaw, H.; Parkinson, J.; Quarmby, C. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1989; p. 565. [Google Scholar]
  17. Soltanpour, P.; Schwab, A. A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro-and micro-nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 1977, 8, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil. Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Machuca, A.; Milagres, A. Use of CAS-agar plate modified to study the effect of different variables on the siderophore production by Aspergillus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oladipo, O.G.; Awotoye, O.O.; Olayinka, A.; Bezuidenhout, C.C.; Maboeta, M.S. Heavy metal tolerance traits of filamentous fungi isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ridgway, R. Color Standards and Color Nomenclature; The Author: Washington, DC, USA, 1912. [CrossRef]
  22. Heyman, H.M.; Senejoux, F.; Seibert, I.; Klimkait, T.; Maharaj, V.J.; Meyer, J.J.M. Identification of anti-HIV active dicaffeoylquinic-and tricaffeoylquinic acids in Helichrysum populifolium by NMR-based metabolomic guided fractionation. Fitoterapia 2015, 103, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 156, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zayed, A.M.; Selim, A.Q.; Mohamed, E.A.; Wahed, M.S.A.; Seliem, M.K.; Sillanpää, M. Adsorption characteristics of Na-A zeolites synthesized from Egyptian kaolinite for manganese in aqueous solutions: Response surface modeling and optimization. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 140, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Freundlich, H. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 1906, 57, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar]
  27. Joshi, N.; Kumar, A. Physico-chemical analysis of soil and industrial effluents of Sanganer region of Jaipur Rajasthan. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 2, 354–356. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathur, N.; Kumar, A. Physico-chemical characterization of industrial effluents contaminated soil of Sanganer. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Appl. 2013, 4, 226–228. [Google Scholar]
  29. Akbar, K.; Habib, K.; Mozhgan, S.; Mirhassan, R.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and heavy metal contaminated soils. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 1571–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yadav, A.N. Recent Trends in Mycological Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oladipo, A.A. MIL-53 (Fe)-based photo-sensitive composite for degradation of organochlorinated herbicide and enhanced reduction of Cr (VI). PSEP 2018, 116, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zafar, S.; Aqil, F.; Ahmad, I. Metal tolerance and biosorption potential of filamentous fungi isolated from metal contaminated agricultural soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2557–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boyce, K.J.; Andrianopoulos, A. Fungal dimorphism: The switch from hyphae to yeast is a specialized morphogenetic adaptation allowing colonization of a host. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 797–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fogarty, R.V.; Tobin, J.M. Fungal melanins and their interactions with metals. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liaquat, F.; Haroon, U.; Munis, M.F.H.; Arif, S.; Khizar, M.; Ali, W.; Shengquan, C.; Qunlu, L. Efficient recovery of metal tolerant fungi from the soil of industrial area and determination of their biosorption capacity. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mishra, A.; Malik, A. Novel fungal consortium for bioremediation of metals and dyes from mixed waste stream. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aytar, P.; Gedikli, S.; Buruk, Y.; Cabuk, A.; Burnak, N. Lead and nickel biosorption with a fungal biomass isolated from metal mine drainage: Box–Behnken experimental design. IJEST 2014, 11, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tripathi, R.; Gupta, R.K.; Singh, P.; Bhadwal, A.S.; Shrivastav, A.; Kumar, N.; Shrivastav, B. Ultra-sensitive detection of mercury (II) ions in water sample using gold nanoparticles synthesized by Trichoderma harzianum and their mechanistic approach. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 204, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tigini, V.; Prigione, V.; Donelli, I.; Anastasi, A.; Freddi, G.; Giansanti, P.; Mangiavillano, A.; Varese, G.C. Cunninghamella elegans biomass optimisation for textile wastewater biosorption treatment: An analytical and ecotoxicological approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Qu, Q.; Li, S.; Li, L.; Zuo, L.; Ran, X.; Qu, Y.; Zhu, B. Adsorption and corrosion behaviour of Trichoderma harzianum for AZ31B magnesium alloy in artificial seawater. Corros. Sci. 2017, 118, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, S.H.; Cheow, Y.L.; Ng, S.L.; Ting, A.S.Y. Mechanisms for metal removal established via electron microscopy and spectroscopy: A case study on metal tolerant fungi Penicillium simplicissimum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aryal, M.; Ziagova, M.; Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, M. Study on arsenic biosorption using Fe (III)-treated biomass of Staphylococcus xylosus. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 162, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Crini, G.; Badot, P.-M. Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: A review of recent literature. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 399–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Farhan, S.N.; Khadom, A.A. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2015, 6, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Pawar, R.R.; Gupta, P.; Sawant, S.Y.; Shahmoradi, B.; Lee, S.-M. Porous synthetic hectorite clay-alginate composite beads for effective adsorption of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 114, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liaud, N.; Giniés, C.; Navarro, D.; Fabre, N.; Crapart, S.; Gimbert, I.H.; Levasseur, A.; Raouche, S.; Sigoillot, J.-C. Exploring fungal biodiversity: Organic acid production by 66 strains of filamentous fungi. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2014, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Beveridge, T. The immobilization of soluble metals by bacterial walls. Proc. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1986, 16, 127–139. [Google Scholar]
  48. Puig, S.; Lee, J.; Lau, M.; Thiele, D.J. Biochemical and genetic analyses of yeast and human high affinity copper transporters suggest a conserved mechanism for copper uptake. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 26021–26030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Biosorption mechanisms of heavy metals (M) by fungi.
Figure 1. Biosorption mechanisms of heavy metals (M) by fungi.
Jof 09 00382 g001
Figure 2. Mean values of tolerance index (%) associated with standard errors (i.e., error bars) of the four isolated fungi at different concentrations of Fe(III) ranging from 100–1000 mg/L.
Figure 2. Mean values of tolerance index (%) associated with standard errors (i.e., error bars) of the four isolated fungi at different concentrations of Fe(III) ranging from 100–1000 mg/L.
Jof 09 00382 g002
Figure 3. Radial growth diameters of colonies: (a) Curvularia lunata, (b) Fusarium equiseti, (c) Penicillium pinophilum, (d) Trichoderma harzianum, (I) PDA media with no metal, and (II) PDA media supplemented with 100 mg/L of Fe(III).
Figure 3. Radial growth diameters of colonies: (a) Curvularia lunata, (b) Fusarium equiseti, (c) Penicillium pinophilum, (d) Trichoderma harzianum, (I) PDA media with no metal, and (II) PDA media supplemented with 100 mg/L of Fe(III).
Jof 09 00382 g003
Figure 4. SEM photomicrographs showing the effect of Fe(III) on fungal mycelia. (a) control sample without Fe(III) uptake, (b,c) 50 μm, and (d) effect of Fe(III) uptake on fungal mycelia.
Figure 4. SEM photomicrographs showing the effect of Fe(III) on fungal mycelia. (a) control sample without Fe(III) uptake, (b,c) 50 μm, and (d) effect of Fe(III) uptake on fungal mycelia.
Jof 09 00382 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of T. harzianum before and after Fe(III) uptake.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of T. harzianum before and after Fe(III) uptake.
Jof 09 00382 g005
Figure 6. Effect of initial Fe(III) concentrations on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake (mg/g).
Figure 6. Effect of initial Fe(III) concentrations on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake (mg/g).
Jof 09 00382 g006
Figure 7. Effect of pH on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake.
Figure 7. Effect of pH on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake.
Jof 09 00382 g007
Figure 8. Effect of temperature on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake.
Figure 8. Effect of temperature on (a) Fe(III) removal (%) and (b) Fe(III) uptake.
Jof 09 00382 g008
Figure 9. Langmuir isotherm model for Fe(III) uptake by (a) C. lunata, (b) F. equiseti, (c) P.pinophilum, and (d) T. harzianum.
Figure 9. Langmuir isotherm model for Fe(III) uptake by (a) C. lunata, (b) F. equiseti, (c) P.pinophilum, and (d) T. harzianum.
Jof 09 00382 g009
Figure 10. Freundlich isotherm model for Fe(III) uptake by (a) C. lunata, (b) F. equiseti, (c) P. pinophilum, and (d) T. harzianum.
Figure 10. Freundlich isotherm model for Fe(III) uptake by (a) C. lunata, (b) F. equiseti, (c) P. pinophilum, and (d) T. harzianum.
Jof 09 00382 g010
Table 1. Adsorption isotherms models for Fe(III) uptake by the isolated fungi.
Table 1. Adsorption isotherms models for Fe(III) uptake by the isolated fungi.
Isotherm ModelFormulaParametersRefs.
Langmuir C e q e = C e q m a x + 1 k L q m a x Ce (mg/L): equilibrium concentration of the resting Fe(III) in the solution
qe (mg/g): the removed amount of Fe(III) at equilibrium
qmax (mg/g): maximum adsorption capacity
kL (L/mg): Langmuir constant
qmax = 1/slope
[25]
Freundlich l o g q e = l o g k f + 1 n l o g c e Ce (mg/L): equilibrium concentration of the resting Fe(III) in the solution
qe (mg/g): the removed amount of Fe(III) at equilibrium
KF (mg/g): Fe(III) adsorption capacity.
n: heterogeneity factor
kF = 10intercept
1/n = slope
[26]
Table 2. Mean values of soil analyses associated with SD.
Table 2. Mean values of soil analyses associated with SD.
Soil PropertiesSoil Sample
pH7.380 ± 0.008
Electrical conductivity (mS/m)25.30 ± 0.50
Organic carbon (%)0.330 ± 0.012
Clay (%)12.50 ± 0.40
Sand (%)43.33± 0.47
Silt (%)44.16 ± 0.23
Soil textureSandy loamy
Moisture content (%)2.00
Available nutrients (mg/kg)
N16.00 ± 0.20
P8.00 ± 0.40
K10.35 ± 0.05
Heavy metal (mg/kg)
Fe(III)118.40 ± 2.30
Table 3. The macroscopic characteristics of isolated fungi.
Table 3. The macroscopic characteristics of isolated fungi.
Isolated FungiColony Features on PDA Media 7-Day-Old
Curvularia lunataBlack colonies with brown-black reverse and fluffy texture
Fusarium equisetiWhite-pinky colonies with white-pale yellow reverse and dense texture (lanose)
Penicillium pinophilumGreen colonies with yellow margins and pale orange-light orange reverse and velvety texture
Trichoderma harzianumWhite mycelium with green colonies with yellowish reverse and cottony texture
Table 4. The isotherm parameters of the Fe(III) adsorption by the isolated fungi.
Table 4. The isotherm parameters of the Fe(III) adsorption by the isolated fungi.
AdsorbentInitial Fe(III) Concentration (mg/L)Isotherm Model
LangmuirFreundlich
ParametersParameters
qmax (mg/g)KL
(L/mg)
R2KF
(mg/g)
N
(L/mg)
R2
Curvularia lunata50–20061.340.03900.984.201.800.93
Fusarium equiseti62.900.03800.974.501.880.94
Penicillium pinophilum63.300.03950.975.501.900.94
Trichoderma harzianum72.460.02600.945.602.200.95
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tagyan, A.I.; Yasser, M.M.; Mousa, A.M.; Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Marzouk, M.A. A Feasibility Study on the Recall of Metallophilic Fungi from Fe(III)-Contaminated Soil and Evaluating Their Mycoremediation Capacity: Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030382

AMA Style

Tagyan AI, Yasser MM, Mousa AM, Alkhalifah DHM, Hozzein WN, Marzouk MA. A Feasibility Study on the Recall of Metallophilic Fungi from Fe(III)-Contaminated Soil and Evaluating Their Mycoremediation Capacity: Experimental and Theoretical Study. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(3):382. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tagyan, Aya I., Manal M. Yasser, Ahmed M. Mousa, Dalal Hussien M. Alkhalifah, Wael N. Hozzein, and Marym A. Marzouk. 2023. "A Feasibility Study on the Recall of Metallophilic Fungi from Fe(III)-Contaminated Soil and Evaluating Their Mycoremediation Capacity: Experimental and Theoretical Study" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 3: 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop