Next Article in Journal
What’s New in Cryptococcus gattii: From Bench to Bedside and Beyond
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Transcriptional Responses of Human Granulocytes to Fungal Infection with Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus
Previous Article in Journal
Applications of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Flagellin Pre-Exposure on the Inflammatory and Antifungal Response of Bronchial Epithelial Cells to Fungal Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Human Airway Epithelium Responses to Invasive Fungal Infections: A Critical Partner in Innate Immunity

by
Arianne J. Crossen
1,†,
Rebecca A. Ward
1,†,
Jennifer L. Reedy
1,2,
Manalee V. Surve
2,3,
Bruce S. Klein
4,5,6,
Jayaraj Rajagopal
3,7,8,9 and
Jatin M. Vyas
1,2,*
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
2
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3
Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
4
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
5
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
6
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
7
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
8
Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
9
Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010040
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunity to Human Fungal Pathogens)

Abstract

:
The lung epithelial lining serves as the primary barrier to inhaled environmental toxins, allergens, and invading pathogens. Pulmonary fungal infections are devastating and carry high mortality rates, particularly in those with compromised immune systems. While opportunistic fungi infect primarily immunocompromised individuals, endemic fungi cause disease in immune competent and compromised individuals. Unfortunately, in the case of inhaled fungal pathogens, the airway epithelial host response is vastly understudied. Furthering our lack of understanding, very few studies utilize primary human models displaying pseudostratified layers of various epithelial cell types at air-liquid interface. In this review, we focus on the diversity of the human airway epithelium and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of oncological cell lines, immortalized epithelial cells, and primary epithelial cell models. Additionally, the responses by human respiratory epithelial cells to invading fungal pathogens will be explored. Future investigations leveraging current human in vitro model systems will enable identification of the critical pathways that will inform the development of novel vaccines and therapeutics for pulmonary fungal infections.

1. Should We Care about Pulmonary Lung Infections?

Pulmonary fungal infections result in high mortality rates, especially in patients with compromised immune status, because of insensitive diagnostics, lack of molecular understanding of the pathophysiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and limited knowledge of the nature of coordination between epithelial cells and the immune system to develop a protective response. This highlights the critical need to better understand host defense against invading fungi. In the United States, direct healthcare costs from hospitalizations and outpatient visits due to fungal infections amount to $7.3 billion annually, with more than $2.4 billion specifically associated with the treatment of pulmonary fungal pathogens [1]. This estimate is likely significantly lower than actual healthcare costs due to the underdiagnosis of IFIs. The primary pathogens responsible for IFIs in the lungs include Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Pneumocystis, Coccidioides, Paracoccidioides, Blastomyces, and Histoplasma (Table 1) [2]. These fungal organisms are typically classified into two categories: opportunistic and endemic/dimorphic.
While treatments for cancer, end-organ failure, and autoimmune disease have improved over the past decade, these immunomodulatory strategies also increase the risk of opportunistic fungal infections. Indeed, opportunistic fungal infections exploit high-risk patient populations, including those with cancer, solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, autoimmune disease, HIV infection, and pre-existing respiratory diseases (e.g., asthma, cystic fibrosis [CF], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) [20,21]. Individuals with prior pulmonary viral infections (e.g., influenza and SARS-CoV-2) also experience elevated risk of pulmonary fungal superinfections [22,23,24,25,26,27], although the mechanism of increased susceptibility remains poorly understood. These patient populations have steadily risen over the past ten years, correlating with increased IFI prevalence and mortality [26]. Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and Pneumocystis are the most prominent opportunistic fungal pathogens in the lungs [7,20,28].
Contrary to opportunistic pathogenic fungi that largely impact immunocompromised individuals, endemic fungi can cause a range of disease severity regardless of their host’s immune status (i.e., immunocompetent or immunocompromised). Although these organisms are typically restricted to a specific geographic region, current reports suggest these fungi are expanding well beyond their historical areas, in some cases likely due to changing climate, thus amplifying the risk of acquiring fungal disease burden [29]. The most prominent endemic fungi contributing to pulmonary fungal infections in humans include Coccidioides, Paracoccidioides, Blastomyces, and Histoplasma [29]. Although these pathogens infect individuals regardless of immune status, an immunocompromised status amplifies the risk of severe disease and mortality (Table 1). Furthermore, classically opportunistic fungal infections, such as cryptococcosis, have also been identified in immunocompetent individuals (i.e., C. gattii infections), though far less frequently than their dimorphic counterparts [30,31,32].
Clinical data and current literature indicate that several components of the immune system are critical for the swift clearance of fungal pathogens. Still, the rules that govern inflammatory responses to fungi in the lungs are not well understood. Past studies have focused on innate and adaptive immune responses but have overlooked a key player in these respiratory infections: the airway epithelium. Here, we review in vitro models utilized to study the human airway epithelium, the complexity of the respiratory epithelium in humans, and its contribution to host responses to invasive fungal pathogens. While the respiratory epithelium spans the upper (nasal cavity, pharynx, larynx) and lower (conducting airways and respiratory zone) respiratory tract, this review will focus on the lower respiratory tract, with particular focus on the bronchioles (lower airways) and alveolar regions.

2. Viewing Human Airway Epithelium as a Monomorphic Barrier Is Outdated

Investigations have revealed that the respiratory epithelium is a complex, immunologically active cell network composed of distinct cell types. Single-cell sequencing of lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage samples unveiled the vast complexity of the human airway epithelium [33,34]. Once thought to be comprised primarily of ciliated cells, club cells, goblet cells, and basal cells, the small airway epithelium is pseudostratified with both common cell types (basal, ciliated, club, goblet) and rare cell types (ionocytes, neuroendocrine, tuft cells), each with specialized functions [34,35,36].
Basal cells are multipotent stem cells critical for the repair and regeneration of the epithelium and account for a third of epithelial cells in the respiratory tract [37]. As the name suggests, ciliated cells promote the clearance of mucus and debris through coordinated beating of cilia pods. Secretion of mucus, as well as peptides with anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties, is mediated through the two secretory cells in epithelium—club and goblet cells. Recently identified ionocytes regulate ion transport, fluid, and pH [35,38,39]. Additionally, this rare cell type is the primary expressor of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Neuroendocrine cells in the airway epithelium act as environmental sensors and send signals to the central nervous system [40]. Functioning as chemosensory cells, tuft cells have been linked to type 2 immunity and are thought to synthesize cysteinyl leukotrienes critical to the coordinated influx of immune cells [41]. Another cell type recently described is the microfold (M) cell, which can sample the environment, translocate pathogens, and is often associated with underlying patches of immune cell follicles termed bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) [42,43,44].
Upon inhalation of a pathogen, the airway epithelium is the first point of contact, suggesting these cells may be critical to shaping proper host responses. Indeed, responses by the epithelium trigger mucous production, coordinated cilia action, and recruitment of immune cells to the site of the pathogen [45,46]. Respiratory epithelial cells can sense and respond to inhaled pathogens by activating pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading to the secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines, and subsequent recruitment of innate immune cells [47]. Below, we will introduce models utilized to study human airway epithelium. While there are resident immune cells in the lungs (i.e., alveolar macrophages, tissue-resident memory T cells [TRM]), these are beyond the scope of this review.

2.1. Mouse Models and Cell Lines Do Not Phenocopy Human Respiratory Epithelial Biology

Murine pulmonary fungal infections models are beneficial for dissecting the molecular pathways involved in the response to fungal infections and examining the impact of novel therapeutic targets on infection progression and mortality rates. Still, they do not fully recapitulate human disease. As an example, immunocompetent mice are highly resistant to Aspergillus fumigatus delivered intratracheally. Indeed, most models require high dose steroids to recapitulate lung phenotypes [48]. Another example is highlighted by the failure of the formalin killed spherule vaccine to protect humans in clinical trials, although the vaccine was highly protective in murine models against Coccidioides infection [49]. Human in vitro models are limited by challenges in cell culture techniques. Nearly all published studies of human airway epithelium utilize cell lines, including the cancer lines A549, H292, and Calu-3 [50,51,52], as well as immortalized non-cancerous bronchial epithelial lines (BEAS-2B, HBEC3-KT, and 16HBE) (Table 2). A549 is the most widely utilized cell line to study fungal infections. While these easily passaged and long-lasting cell lines have provided valuable data to further our understanding of the respiratory epithelium, numerous limitations reduce the impact of these studies alone.
Human cancer cell lines (i.e., A549, Calu-3, H292) have monomorphic oncogenic nature that does not recapitulate the fully differentiated, pseudostratified characteristics of primary human airway epithelium. The simplification of the diverse human airway epithelium observed in these cell lines removes highly specialized networks seen in vivo in disease and infections. Emerging data indicate that specialized cell types in primary airway epithelium contribute differentially to the integrated response. Hence, monomorphic cell lines lack the ability to participate in complex intercellular communications. For example, these cell lines lack club cells, an epithelial cell type critical in driving Aspergillus-mediated allergic inflammation [53]. Another epithelial subtype lacking in these cell lines is ionocytes, which are the primary CFTR producers and essential to CF pathophysiology. CFTR is, however, present in Calu-3 cells [54]. Although ciliated cells are abundant and critical to epithelial function, these cancer cell lines are deficient in beating cilia. Rather than forming the pseudostratified layer with multiple cell subtypes seen in tissue, these lung epithelial cell lines form a monolayer. Furthermore, A549 and H292 cells must be grown submerged in media, unlike primary cells, which grow in an air-liquid interface (ALI) as seen in vivo. Calu-3 cells grown at ALI form pseudostratified layers rather than the monolayer observed in submerged culture [55]. Although most similar of the cell lines to primary epithelial cells, Calu-3 has not been widely utilized in fungal infection models [56,57].
Table 2. Human respiratory epithelial cell lines.
Table 2. Human respiratory epithelial cell lines.
Cell LineSourceImmortalization MethodSex & Ethnicity of SourceRef
A549Explant culture of lung
carcinomatous tissue; alveolar
N/AMale; Caucasian[58]
BEAS-2BNormal human bronchial epithelium (non-cancerous individuals)Adenovirus 12-SV40 virusMale; No ethnicity noted[59,60]
Calu-3Pleural effusion from an individual with lung adenocarcinoma; bronchialN/AMale; Caucasian[61]
HBEC3-KTPrimary human bronchial
epithelial cell
hTERT expression & mouse CDK4-expressing retrovirusFemale; No ethnicity noted[62]
H292Lymph node metastasis of a pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinomaN/AFemale; Black[63]
16HBEHuman bronchial epithelial cell from a heart-lung patientOrigin-of-replication defective SV40 plasmidMale; No ethnicity noted[64]
Although the immortalized cells derived from non-tumorigenic lung tissue (BEAS-2B, 16HBE, and HBEC3-KT) are not oncogenic, these cells also have significant limitations. Many of these cell lines undergo squamous differentiation, suggesting a uniformity not seen in the human body. Culture conditions (i.e., presence of fetal bovine serum [FBS]) mediate this differentiation in BEAS-2B cells, leading to varied sensitivity to stimulation and altered gene expression and cell metabolism [65]. The presence of FBS may explain the lack of differentiation into multiple sub-types seen in one study, which observed mucin 5AC (MUC5AC)-positive goblet cells in primary epithelium but not BEAS-2B cells [66]. The BEAS-2B line exhibits similar characteristics to mesenchymal stem cells, including surface markers, suppressive activity, and osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation [67]. Immortalized with SV40 plasmid, 16HBEs have been widely used to investigate asthma, COPD, and cancer. The advantages of 16HBE cells include the expression of mucus on the epithelium [68], expression of the critical CF channel, CFTR, and has been noted to maintain many morphological phenotypes and functions seen in primary cells [64,68]. Unfortunately, these cells lack cilia, a significant structure for host defense by epithelial cells. Furthermore, these cells grow as a mix of monolayer and multilayer. Comparisons of immortalized and primary cells have suggested that primary epithelial cells are more sensitive to toxins (e.g., mycotoxin from Fusarium) [69].
Of the cell lines originating from non-cancer patients, HBEC3-KT is most similar to primary cells. Indeed, HBEC3-KT is grown in pseudostratified layers under ALI conditions and produces mucus-secreting cells and cilia [70]. The existence of rare cell types in this system has not been reported. Although these cells are closest to primary cultures, IL-6 secretion and mucociliary differentiation are also impaired compared to primary airway epithelium [71]. Furthermore, this line lacks inflammatory characteristics such as the absence of LPS-induced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor α [TNFα], interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-12) [72]. While the ease of passaging and growing oncogenic and immortalized cells has led to these lines being widely utilized, they lack key features of primary epithelium, limiting the ability to make generalized conclusions using this system. Hence, primary cells are critical to understanding human biology.

2.2. Towards a Better Model of Human Airway Epithelium

Primary human airway epithelial cells (hAECs) derived from epithelial stem cells circumvent the limitations of immortalized and oncologic cell lines. Unfortunately, primary cells grow slowly, can be more technically challenging, and are limited in the number of times they can be passaged. Co-culture with fibroblasts and Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibition improved the use of epithelial stem cells, but the lifespan remained short [73,74]. Recently, a novel method for extended culturing of patient-derived hAECs was created through dual SMAD inhibition in basal cells [75]. Basal cells from patient sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, or tissue samples can be isolated, expanded beyond ten passages, and differentiated into airway epithelium. These cultures recapitulate the true diversity of conducting airway epithelium with common and rare cell types in pseudostratified layers, enabling mechanistic studies in rare populations and the epithelial network in disease [35]. Additionally, these cells can be grown at ALI, allowing the formation of polarized barriers and investigation of basolateral and apical responses in disease.
While the primary hAECs ALI model may not fully recapitulate the in vivo environment (e.g., lacks resident immune cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts), this model offers the advantages of a highly pliable system to conduct mechanistic studies without compromising relevant human physiology. A key benefit is the ability to isolate basal cells from specific patient populations to better understand the epithelial contribution to pathophysiology. Indeed, these differentiated primary hAECs have been isolated from healthy people as well as patients with CF, COPD, and asthma [76,77,78]. While promising, these studies have not been expanded to those patients with known prior IFIs to determine if epithelial cells retain the memory of prior infection (e.g., epigenetic modifications, altered cytokine profile). It should be noted that substantial variability in differentiated epithelium likely exists between samples collected from multiple individuals. Thus, pertinent information should be tracked and considered during data analyses, including age, sex, ethnicity, underlying lung disease, and known medications. Furthermore, expanding studies to include co-culture with primary hAEC and relevant immune cells provides an ideal platform to dissect lung immune responses. Leveraging the ALI hAECs to investigate host defense against invading pathogens, particularly from high-risk populations (e.g., CF, COPD, cancer), is an essential tool for understanding human lung biology.

3. The Human Airway Epithelium Is a Key Player in the Host-Fungal Pathogen Battle

Much of our current understanding of pulmonary fungal infections comes from animal models, which likely does not fully recapitulate human diseases. While much of these data are important to the field, we will focus on studies using human airway epithelial models. Narrowing the focus to human airway epithelial studies drastically reduced the literature search for lung epithelium responses to fungal pathogens, highlighting this critical gap in knowledge. Our understanding of airway epithelial responses to endemic fungi is minimal. Responses of airway epithelium to Coccidioides have not been reported in human or animal models. Investigations into Blastomyces, Histoplasma, and Paracoccidioides primarily utilize experimental models rather than human airway epithelial cell systems [79,80]. Opportunistic fungal infections, especially Aspergillus spp., and human airway epithelial cells are more commonly studied compared to endemic fungi, but limited information is available for Cryptococcus, Mucor, Rhizopus, and Pneumocystis. Thus, we mainly focus on the epithelial-mediated immune response to invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). This section will flow from the initial inhalation of a pathogen to airway defenses and then to downstream recruitment of immune cells to the site of infection. In addition to discussing immunity driven by human airway epithelium, we briefly examined models for bacterial and viral pulmonary infections in primary cells that can be adapted to the field of fungal immunology.

3.1. First Contact with Fungal Pathogens

The conducting airway epithelium is the first point of contact for inhaled fungal pathogens. As the first line of defense, the airway epithelium, the associated mucus, and resident alveolar macrophages are critical for removing conidia. In addition to the barrier function conferred by lung epithelium, immune cells are vital to the containment and clearance of fungi. Upon disruption, the fungal conidia and spores are inhaled and can reach the distal airways in the lungs. Studies using human biopsy samples and cadaver tissue demonstrate that Aspergillus infections in the lung are a disease of the distal airways and not the alveolar spaces [81]. Notably, the proximal airways remove inhaled Aspergillus conidia through mucociliary clearance, but impairment of this response enables colonization and invasion [82]. Coccidioides arthroconidia can reach the terminal airways [83], but the contribution of the epithelium in response remains poorly understood for this and other endemic fungi. Models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial infections revealed that mucin 1 (MUC1) mediated bacterial adherence, dampened inflammation, and facilitated infection in airway epithelium [84,85]. MUC1 also binds to Pneumocystis and contributes to decreased inflammatory signaling [86], suggesting fungal organisms may leverage host-derived mucins to facilitate invasion.
Prior to interactions directly with lung epithelium, fungal organisms secrete proteases and cytolytic toxins that can disrupt barriers through tight junction break down, facilitate epithelial remodeling, and trigger immune responses. In Aspergillus infections, proteases play a role in fungal asthma and allergic fungal airway disease. Alkaline protease 1 (Alp1) levels from Aspergillus correlate with asthma and disease severity in patients [87], which elicit eosinophilic infiltration in the lungs and damage cell junctions [53]. Other protease implicated in disease and airway remodeling from fungal pathogens include matrix metalloprotease (Asp f 5) and serine protease (Asp f 13) [88]. Furthermore, protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) on human epithelium, which recognizes fungal proteases, skews immune responses towards a type 2 bias in allergic diseases [89]. Little is known about the role of fungal-derived protease in IPA. In addition to proteases, fungal pathogens can release toxins that disrupt host barriers. Gliotoxin, a mycotoxin derived from Aspergillus, causes airway epithelium disruption through destabilization of actin filaments [90]. Proteases and cytolytic toxins may promote invasion through the break down of the lung epithelial barrier and promote immune responses and warrants further investigations in IFIs.
While fungal pathogens employ mechanisms to disrupt host defenses, the airway epithelium maintains the critical barrier essential for the resistance to fungal infections. One mechanism of protection for this barrier occurs through the production of antimicrobial proteins and peptides (AMPs; e.g., lysozymes, β-defensin, ferrins) by lung epithelial cells. The mucus layer on the epithelial barrier contains these AMPs, which can provide host defense prior to direct interaction with the inhaled pathogen. Lysozyme enables damage to polysaccharides on microbes and decreases metabolic activity of A. fumigatus hyphae and Histoplasma [91]. Airway epithelial cells increase β-defensin-1 in response to A. fumigatus and restricts grown for germinating conidia, but not hyphae [91,92]. Transferrin and lactoferrin deplete iron from the environment and blunt microbial growth. Like β-defensin, lactoferrin inhibits gemination of conidia, but not hyphal growth, revealing that gemination may require more iron [91]. Mucormycosis amplifies serum iron levels, which indicates a potential deficit in lactoferrin or transferrin function [93]. These AMPs could be targeted as a therapeutic strategy. Some high-risk patient populations for invasive fungal disease, such as COPD, have reduced AMP secretion, suggesting one component of increased susceptibility to infection in these populations. While AMPs are important to host immunity, limited information is available for these, especially in endemic fungal organisms.
In addition to AMPs, airway epithelia produce soluble PRRs (sPRRs) that inform host responses to invading pathogens including pentraxin 3 (PTX3), C-reactive protein (CRP), collectins (e.g., mannose binding lectin [MBL], surfactant protein A and D), serum amyloid A, and complement components (e.g., C3, C5) [94]. PTX3 is a critical regulator of antifungal host immunity in pneumocystis and aspergillosis infections [95,96,97] and may be a diagnostic tool for IPA in BAL fluid [98]. MBL, which activates complement systems, has been implicated in patients with IA, coccidioidomycosis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia [99,100,101]. Although many sPRRs have been implicated in human disease, limited studies have investigated the role of these in secreted receptors in human airway models. Although the mucus, AMPs, and sPRRs provide a first line of defense, fungal pathogens often adhere and directly interact with epithelial cells.
Fungal pathogens attach to the epithelium, inhibiting clearance by the host and facilitating invasion by the pathogen. Integrins on the surface of airway epithelium enable attachment of fungal spores and subsequent host response (e.g., internalization, immune cell recruitment). Integrins α3 and α5 are implicated in epithelial response to multiple fungal pathogens, including Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Pneumocystis, and Paracoccidioides [102,103]. It should be noted that these studies investigating integrins all utilized A549 cells, which may not accurately describe epithelial responses in humans. Cell wall components interacting with host integrins include the Aspergillus cell wall thaumatin-like protein CalA on Aspergillus, Pneumocystis glycoprotein gp120, and β-1,3-glucan [102,104]. The integrin α3β1 on epithelial cells activates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) enabling invasion of Rhizopus [105], and inhibition with the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib blocked Rhizopus invasion in vitro [106]. In addition to the α3 and α5 integrins, the complement receptor CR3 has been identified as a β2 integrin that can recognize and promote conidia internalization through elevated phosphatidic acid intracellularly [107]. Integrin binding and activation lead to endocytosis and subsequent invasion in immortalized cells. While integrins play a role in host responses, other receptors on the respiratory epithelium likely contribute as well.
Understanding the receptors expressed by respiratory epithelial cells that recognize invasive fungal pathogens is critical. In immune cells, activation of PRRs (e.g., C-type lectin receptors [CLRs], Toll-like receptors [TLRs], NOD-like receptors [NLRs], and Rig-I-like receptors) mediate host responses to fungi. Dectin-1, TLRs (TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, TLR9), and NOD3 have been well studied in immune cells in response to fungi and are also expressed in human airway epithelium [108]. While these fungal sensing receptors have been reported in respiratory epithelium, little to no studies have been published to better understand these signaling pathways in a human in vitro model.
Many PRRs recognize fungal cell wall components. Cell wall chitin on A. fumigatus swollen conidia and hyphae binds to fibrinogen C domain-containing protein 1 (FIBCD1), a PRR apically detected on ciliated epithelial cells in human lung tissue, which suppresses mucin production, IL-8 secretion, and transcription of inflammatory mediators [109]. This may be a mechanism to avoid hyperinflammation by the host or fungal-mediated dampening of the host’s inflammatory response. Interestingly, the cell line HBE upregulates Dectin-1, a critical CLR known to activate in response to β-glucan on the fungal cell wall following infection with A. fumigatus [110]. Furthermore, human lung tissue immunohistochemical staining unveiled Dectin-1 on the apical bronchiolar and alveolar epithelium [111]. Dectin-1 mediates phagocytosis, suggesting that this receptor may enable conidial phagocytosis. Additionally, studies investigating the ability to kill internalized fungal organisms differ drastically, with some showing high fungal killing and others demonstrating inhibition of germination within epithelial cells.
Some reports indicate that airway epithelium phagocytose invading fungi, while others fail to observe this uptake, suggesting that phagocytosis machinery may differ between cell lines. Indeed, cell lines (i.e., A549, 16HBE, 1HAE, BEAS-2B) has been reported to internalize approximately 30–50% of Aspergillus conidia encountered [112,113,114]. Furthermore, C. neoformans adheres to and can be internalized by A549 and BEAS-2B cells [115,116]. Cigarette smoke extract increases adhesion and stimulates fungal growth but reduces the internalization of Cryptococcus in BEAS-2B cells, enabling growth in the airways [117]. While Aspergillus can be internalized, the epithelial cell often does not kill the fungus. One study observed that a failure of phagosome maturation coupled with a fusion of the fungal-containing phagolysosome with the plasma membrane contributed to a lack of killing and the ability of the fungi to continue growing within the host [118]. On the contrary, primary cultures have reported rare or no internalization of conidia by respiratory epithelial cells [119,120]. Rather than phagocytosis, one investigation demonstrated that Aspergillus hyphae form an actin tunnel in primary hAECs without impacting viability [119]. This observation suggests that internalization of conidia is not required for invasion. Further studies are warranted to determine if phagocytosis occurs in primary human cells and the subtype(s) responsible. Given the differences in internalization of fungal spores between cell lines and primary cells, confirmatory analyses should be conducted in primary epithelium. The immortalization process and loss of cellular diversity in human cell lines may explain these contradictory results. Furthermore, the differences in culture methods (e.g., media, ALI) may also contribute to the varied results reported. PRRs triggered by fungal pathogens on airway epithelium lead to inflammatory signaling and immune cell recruitment, highlighting the essential role of the lung epithelium in antifungal host defense.

3.1.1. Communication Is Key to a Strong and Coordinated Immune Response

Secreted proteins and molecules, termed the secretome, trigger surrounding cells to respond to their environment. In the lung epithelium, the secretome can contribute to mucociliary clearance, pro-inflammatory cascades that recruit local and circulating immune cells to the site of invasion, or anti-inflammatory responses. Secretome analyses in BEAS-2B cells demonstrated that Aspergillus triggered thioredoxin activation, lysosomal degranulation, and cathepsin, suggesting immune defense systems within these cells [121]. Further studies identified the production of critical inflammatory and antimicrobial peptides following infection by fungal pathogens, including IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), human β-defensin (HBD)2, HBD9, chemokine ligand (CXCL)1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and TNFα, with IL-6 and IL-8 being the most widely studied [103,110,116,117,122].
C. neoformans capsular component glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) triggers CD14 receptor-mediated IL-8 secretion [123,124]. An acapsular strain of C. neoformans induced greater secretion of IL-8 as well as cellular damage in primary human bronchial epithelial cells when compared to its encapsulated parent strain [116]. Unlike the primary cells, SV40-immortalized BEAS-2B cells only produced IL-8 in response to acapsular C. neoformans simulations, demonstrating that some inflammatory responses may be lost in immortalized or oncogenic cell lines through the immortalizing process or lack of cell diversity. Secretion of IL-8 in response to direct contact with Paracoccidioides is mediated through TLR2 and the integrin α3 interaction [125], although the ligand responsible for activation has not been reported. Another study observed that protease-activated receptor antagonism blunted IL-6 and IL-8 cytokine production in Paracoccidioides infection of A549 cells [126]. In the setting of Aspergillus infection, Dectin-1 and CR3 mediated release of IL-8 and MCP-1 through induction of NFκB [127]. The pro-inflammatory signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-mediated IL-6 stimulation and anti-inflammatory response (e.g., chemokines C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 [CCL2]/extracellular signal regulated kinase ½ [ERK1/2] and IL-10) have been demonstrated in cryptococcal infections in vitro in combination with either cigarette smoke or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (a trigger for allergic asthma) [117,128]. While many of these studies provide a window into the human lung, they primarily utilize immortalized and oncologic cell lines and need to be validated in primary ALI systems. Once these inflammatory factors are secreted by the epithelium, they can target circulating immune cells and recruit them to the site of infection.
Neutrophils are first responders to invading pathogens. Early neutrophil responses inhibit conidial germination and cause damage to A. fumigatus hyphae [129]. Many studies demonstrate the ability of the airway epithelium to release chemotactic molecules to recruit neutrophils to fungal invaders, including IL-6 and IL-8. However, these are principally in cell lines rather than primary models [130]. Utilizing an inverted ALI model, neutrophil recruitment across the epithelium can be measured in response to pathogens. Apical stimulation of primary hAECs with A. fumigatus lacking melanin, but not wild-type conidia, promoted transepithelial migration of human neutrophils, suggesting an immunomodulatory role for melanin [77]. However, the factor(s) responsible for this response have not been reported. Secretion of chemotactic cytokines by immortalized and primary nasal epithelial cells coincides with conidial germination, which leads to the shedding of the rodlet and melanin layers [130]. Leveraging this inverted ALI model to measure neutrophil recruitment can provide insight into initial responses by the host and identify novel therapeutic targets. While this system has been used to study Aspergillus infections in healthy hAECs, this can be expanded to include basal cells and neutrophils isolated from high-risk patient populations and to examine other pulmonary fungal invaders.
Macrophages, one of the most studied innate immune cells in response to fungal infections, exist as local immune cells (alveolar macrophages) and circulating immune cells recruited to the site of infection (monocytes and macrophages). Unfortunately, limited investigations report the interaction between human airway epithelium and monocytes or macrophages in response to invading fungi. Secretion of endothelin-2 has been implicated in chemoattraction and activation of macrophages. Upregulation of endothelin-2 has been noted in Pneumocystis-stimulated A549 cells [131]. Further investigations are needed to determine if these and other cytokines and chemokines truly play a role in epithelial-mediated host defense.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that bridge the innate and adaptive responses to pathogens. Changes in gene expression in A549 cells drastically increased in the presence of myeloid DCs or monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) following infection with A. fumigatus [132]. Genes upregulated in epithelial cells in co-cultures included PRRs (i.e., PTX3), chemokines (i.e., CCL4, CCL13, CCL18, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCR4), and cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-8), while epithelial cells alone upregulated only superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). In co-cultures with A549 cells, moDCs in the alveolar compartment promoted a pro-inflammatory environment and ameliorated Mucorales invasion, whereas A549 alone secreted primarily IL-6 and IL-8 but did not restrain invasion [133]. MoDCs in the lungs are critical for shaping pro-inflammatory responses, phagocytosis of fungal pathogens, and priming of Th1 responses. CD103+ DCs mediate protective Th17 responses in IPA [134].
In addition to DCs, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) enable connection between the innate and adaptive arms of immunity. ILCs are a family of lymphocytes comprising the innate counterparts of T cells. As a significant portion of resident immune cells in the lungs, they secrete cytokines, respond swiftly to pathogenic tissue damage, and shape subsequent adaptive immunity [135]. ILCs, particularly type 2 ILCs (ILC2), have been implicated in the host defense against invasive fungal pathogens [136,137]. Interestingly, deficiency of ILC2s skewed to a type 1 immunity phenotype in pulmonary cryptococcosis, which reduced fungal burden and prolonged survival [136]. The airway epithelium recruit ILC2 through the release of alarmins, such as IL-33, IL-25, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Recruitment of ILC2 to the site of infection enables a Th2 response through the release of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 by the ILC2. Alarmins responsible for ILC recruitment have been implicated in invasive pulmonary fungal infections. Indeed, IL-33 induction from primarily alveolar type 2 epithelial cells recruits ILCs to the lung in Cryptococcus pulmonary infection [138,139]. IL-33 in BAL fluid samples have been detected in patients infected with H. capsulatum and Pneumocystis [140]. Furthermore, a single nucleotide polymorphism that increased the risk of developing IPA correlates with reduced serum levels of TSLP [141]. The role of ILCs in Aspergillus infections is primarily in the context of allergic disease, but these cells may have a protective role in invasive disease. Understanding these ILCs in humans and how they shape innate and adaptive immunity may enable insights into invasive pulmonary fungal infections and therapeutic targets.
T cell immunity is also critical in response to fungal pathogens, as demonstrated by the observation that mice lacking Th1 CD4+ T cells are more susceptible to IPA [142]. In primary human bronchial epithelial models, A. fumigatus triggers PAR-2, mediating the inhibition of IFN-β through the JAK-STAT1 pathway and skewing towards a Th2 phenotype [89,143]. This contributes to worsened outcomes in allergic inflammatory diseases. CXCL12 and its chemokine receptor, CXCR4, are critical for lymphocyte development and function. Gene analysis of A549 cells following infection with Pneumocystis revealed upregulation of CXCL12 and chemokine receptor (CXCR)4 [131], suggesting that respiratory epithelium assists in shaping adaptive immunity to fungal pathogens. Similar to neutrophils, macrophages, and DCs, the role of hAECs in shaping adaptive immunity remains a critical gap in knowledge. Further exploration into these responses may provide valuable targets for vaccination, especially for endemic fungi that infect healthy and immunocompromised individuals.
While some headway has been made on the role of human airway epithelium, most of these studies focus on the healthy epithelium. As noted in Table 1, severe fungal disease occurs in individuals with underlying diseases, including lung disease, other infections (e.g., influenza, HIV, SARS-CoV-2), immunomodulatory medications, and immunocompromised conditions. The contributions of the epithelium in humans susceptible to these diseases are unexplained. Understanding the mechanisms of disease in these patient populations may enable the development of novel therapeutic and preventative strategies. Transcriptional profiling during SARS-CoV-2 superinfection with IPA demonstrated that type III interferon genes and pro-inflammatory chemokines were drastically upregulated [144]. Enhanced inflammation due to increased neutrophil and monocyte recruitment to the airways in SARS-CoV-2 superinfection may drive more severe pathology, amplifying mortality in these patients. Additional studies are needed to understand the pathophysiology leading to fungal superinfections.

3.1.2. DIY Local Immunity—A Novel Paradigm for Lung Immune Responses

The recent identification of M cells in the lungs may clarify how airway epithelium orchestrates complex immune responses involving epithelial barrier function and innate and adaptive immune cells [42,43]. M cells in the gut present atop classic Peyer’s patches of gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT), are epithelial cells with the ability to directly take up luminal antigens through transcytosis and provide their cargo to APCs localized to the basolateral side of the M cell [145,146]. DCs subsequently process and present these antigens to T cells in the lymphoid follicles resulting in B cell activation and maturation, a pathway relevant to vaccine-induced immunity. Thus, gut M cells are essential actors in initiating mucosal immunity to pathogens. While gut M cells participate in immune surveillance, they can also be co-opted and used by pathogens as portals of entry for infection [44,146,147,148]. Indeed, viruses (e.g., influenza, polio), bacteria (e.g., Listeria, Mycobacterium, Streptococcus), and fungi (e.g., Candida albicans) specifically leverage M cells to cross through the gut epithelial barrier [146,148].
Having only recently been found in the lungs of mice, the cellular origins of lung M cells and their functions in lung immunity remain unknown [42,43]. Furthermore, uninfected murine airways typically lack structured BALT. However, they are induced upon lung inflammation and infection. BALT have been identified in various diseases including fungal infections like Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, and Pneumocystis [149,150,151] and have shown to play a critical role in controlling influenza infections [152,153]. Inducible (i) BALT requires Th2 and Th17 immunity and occurs in a CXCL13-dependent manner in response to Pneumocystis infection [154]. It is unknown whether lung M cells and iBALT associate as functional immune units to regulate integrated local mucosal anti-fungal immunity. Furthermore, airway M cells and BALT function in humans is unknown. Within the airways, M cells have only been implicated as portals for infection in the case of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections [44,147]. Further explorations with primary hAEC models should explore whether M cells exist in humans and, if so, what role M cells play in fungal infection.

3.2. Insights from Non-Fungal Pulmonary Infection Models

Invading fungal organisms are drastically understudied compared to their bacterial and viral counterparts. While epithelial and immune cells may respond differently to different types of pathogens, insights can be gained from bacterial and viral infections of the human epithelium. Here, we discuss some models of bacterial and viral infections in primary human airway epithelium with immune cells to dissect immune responses. These models can be adapted to understand the mechanisms underpinning host responses to fungal invaders. An example of this can be demonstrated with the neutrophil transmigration assay, which was described in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections [155] and more recently modified to investigate IPA [77]. Placement of neutrophils in the basolateral compartment in ALI cultures better models in vivo responses compared to co-culture in submerged media. This system not only enables examination of neutrophil recruitment but also neutrophil-mediated damage to the epithelial barrier and impact on pathogen clearance as demonstrated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection [156]. A similar migration assay using peripheral blood mononuclear cells in Bordetella pertussis infection utilizes a flow cytometry readout to examine the migration of NK cells and macrophages [157].
Epithelial co-cultures with macrophages or DCs are limited in fungal infections. Resident alveolar macrophages enhance host defense against invading microbes. The absence of these cells in vitro removes the complex cellular interplay that likely occurs in the human lungs. An inflammation model has reported co-culture with primary hAECs and alveolar macrophages at ALI. While complicated, the addition of airway smooth muscle cells with the epithelium and alveolar macrophages strengthens the translation to the human system [158]. Another study on RSV infection introduced a dual and triple co-culture system with primary ALI bronchial epithelium, monocyte-derived macrophages (apical), and moDCs (basolateral) [159]. Interestingly, the apical presence of macrophages enabled infection of the basal moDCs following epithelial infection, but the presence of epithelium alone did not transmit RSV to moDCs. These data highlight the need to study multiple cell types in an in vitro infection model. This model also would be strengthened using alveolar macrophages rather than isolating macrophages from blood. In co-culture systems such as these, it is critical to match different cell types from the same patient, especially if isolated from an individual with an underlying condition (e.g., CF, COPD). Studies leveraging these systems in pulmonary fungal infections may enable the identification of diverse cellular networks at the site of infection prior to the recruitment of circulating immune cells.

4. Conclusions

The human airway epithelium is essential for host defense against invading microbes, including fungi (Figure 1). Novel techniques enable expanded culturing of primary human airway epithelial cells, recapitulating the diverse phenotype of lung epithelium in tissue. While the epithelium is vital to host response, many studies focus on immune cells rather than epithelial cells. Furthermore, studies focusing on the epithelium often utilize monomorphic cell lines that lack the cellular diversity of the epithelium. Advanced studies are warranted to expand our understanding of the response elements shaped by the epithelium in response to pulmonary fungal pathogens. Additionally, co-culture models with immune cells should be more widely used to dissect the influence of cellular cross talk on molecular mechanisms underpinning proper host responses needed to clear the infection. Together, these studies would provide new targets for vaccine development and therapeutic targets, improving morbidity and mortality associated with devastating invasive pulmonary diseases.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.J.C., R.A.W. and J.M.V.; writing—review and editing, A.J.C., R.A.W., J.L.R., M.V.S., B.S.K., J.R. and J.M.V.; funding acquisition, R.A.W., J.L.R. and J.M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This was funded by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers R21AI152499, R01AI136529, and R01AI150181 to J.M.V.; R01HL118185, R01HL148351, and R01HL157221 to J.R.; R01Al130411, R01AI040996, R37AI035681, R56Al168370, and U01Al124299 to B.S.K., J.L.R. is supported by NIH/NIAID grant 1K08AI14755, NIH/NIAID PCTAS supplement, and KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award (an appointed KL2 award) from Harvard Catalyst| The Harvard Clinical Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [NIH], award KL2 TR001100. B.S.K. is a fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advance Research (CIFAR).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nicole Wolf for their assistance with the artwork (illustration [Figure 1] by Nicole Wolf, MD ©2022). Printed with permission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Benedict, K.; Jackson, B.R.; Chiller, T.; Beer, K.D. Estimation of direct healthcare costs of fungal diseases in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 68, 1791–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Li, Z.; Lu, G.; Meng, G. Pathogenic fungal infection in the lung. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Denning, D.W.; Pleuvry, A.; Cole, D.C. Global burden of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with asthma and its complication chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in adults. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Agarwal, R.; Muthu, V.; Sehgal, I.S.; Dhooria, S.; Prasad, K.T.; Aggarwal, A.N. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin. Chest Med. 2022, 43, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Denning, D.W.; Pleuvry, A.; Cole, D.C. Global burden of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis as a sequel to pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull. World Health Organ. 2011, 89, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barac, A.; Kosmidis, C.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Salzer, H.J.F. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis update: A year in review. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S104–S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. El-Baba, F.; Gao, Y.; Soubani, A.O. Pulmonary aspergillosis: What the generalist needs to know. Am. J. Med. 2020, 133, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cadena, J.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Patterson, T.F. Aspergillosis: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dewi, I.M.; Janssen, N.A.; Rosati, D.; Bruno, M.; Netea, M.G.; Brüggemann, R.J.; Verweij, P.E.; van de Veerdonk, F.L. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis associated with viral pneumonitis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021, 62, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schauwvlieghe, A.; Rijnders, B.J.A.; Philips, N.; Verwijs, R.; Vanderbeke, L.; Van Tienen, C.; Lagrou, K.; Verweij, P.E.; Van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Gommers, D.; et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. Respir. Med. 2018, 6, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Setianingrum, F.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Denning, D.W. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: A review of pathobiology and clinical aspects. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roux, A.; Canet, E.; Valade, S.; Gangneux-Robert, F.; Hamane, S.; Lafabrie, A.; Maubon, D.; Debourgogne, A.; Le Gal, S.; Dalle, F.; et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with or without AIDS, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1490–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, Y.; Su, L.; Jiang, S.J.; Qu, H. Risk factors for mortality from Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV patients: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 59729–59739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Prakash, H.; Chakrabarti, A. Global epidemiology of mucormycosis. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mazi, P.B.; Rauseo, A.M.; Spec, A. Blastomycosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McCotter, O.Z.; Benedict, K.; Engelthaler, D.M.; Komatsu, K.; Lucas, K.D.; Mohle-Boetani, J.C.; Oltean, H.; Vugia, D.; Chiller, T.M.; Sondermeyer Cooksey, G.L.; et al. Update on the epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis in the United States. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S30–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azar, M.M.; Loyd, J.L.; Relich, R.F.; Wheat, L.J.; Hage, C.A. Current concepts in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of histoplasmosis syndromes. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 41, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alvarado, P.; Teixeira, M.M.; Cavallera, E.; Paes, H.C.; Guerra, G.; Santander, G.; Merino-Alado, R. Epidemiology of paracoccidioidomycosis in Venezuela: A retrospective study from 1954 to 2019. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2021, 116, e210203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martinez, R. Epidemiology of paracoccidioidomycosis. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop Sao Paulo 2015, 57 (Suppl. S19), 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zavala, S.; Baddley, J.W. Cryptococcosis. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 41, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schwarz, C.; Brandt, C.; Whitaker, P.; Sutharsan, S.; Skopnik, H.; Gartner, S.; Smazny, C.; Röhmel, J.F. Invasive pulmonary fungal infections in cystic fibrosis. Mycopathologia 2018, 183, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pappas, P.G.; Alexander, B.D.; Andes, D.R.; Hadley, S.; Kauffman, C.A.; Freifeld, A.; Anaissie, E.J.; Brumble, L.M.; Herwaldt, L.; Ito, J.; et al. Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: Results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sipsas, N.V.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Invasive fungal infections in patients with cancer in the Intensive Care Unit. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 39, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, L.; Zhang, N.; Huang, X.; Xiong, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhan, Q. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with influenza infection: A retrospective study and review of the literature. Clin. Respir. J. 2019, 13, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rawson, T.M.; Moore, L.S.P.; Zhu, N.; Ranganathan, N.; Skolimowska, K.; Gilchrist, M.; Satta, G.; Cooke, G.; Holmes, A. Bacterial and fungal coinfection in individuals with coronavirus: A rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2459–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rayens, E.; Norris, K.A.; Cordero, J.F. Mortality trends in risk conditions and invasive mycotic disease in the United States, 1999–2018. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 74, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baddley, J.W.; Cantini, F.; Goletti, D.; Gómez-Reino, J.J.; Mylonakis, E.; San-Juan, R.; Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Torre-Cisneros, J. ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies: An infectious diseases perspective (Soluble immune effector molecules [I]: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, S10–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Moldoveanu, B.; Gearhart, A.M.; Jalil, B.A.; Saad, M.; Guardiola, J.J. Pulmonary aspergillosis: Spectrum of disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 361, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thompson, G.R.; Pasqualotto, A.C. Endemic mycoses: Expansion of traditional geographic ranges and pitfalls in management. Mycoses 2021, 64, 989–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amburgy, J.W.; Miller, J.H.; Ditty, B.J.; Vande Lune, P.; Muhammad, S.; Fisher, W.S., 3rd. Cryptococcus gattii in an immunocompetent patient in the southeastern United States. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2016, 2016, 8280915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andreou, M.; Cogliati, M.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Stroumpos, C.; Stamouli, V.; Ravazoula, P.; Siagris, D.; Papadogeorgaki, H.; Christofidou, M.; Lekkou, A. Cryptococcus gattii infection in an immunocompetent host in Greece. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 27, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. D’Souza, C.A.; Kronstad, J.W.; Taylor, G.; Warren, R.; Yuen, M.; Hu, G.; Jung, W.H.; Sham, A.; Kidd, S.E.; Tangen, K.; et al. Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts. mBio 2011, 2, e00342-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Schiller, H.B.; Montoro, D.T.; Simon, L.M.; Rawlins, E.L.; Meyer, K.B.; Strunz, M.; Vieira Braga, F.A.; Timens, W.; Koppelman, G.H.; Budinger, G.R.S.; et al. The Human Lung Cell Atlas: A high-resolution reference map of the human lung in health and disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 61, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hewitt, R.J.; Lloyd, C.M. Regulation of immune responses by the airway epithelial cell landscape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Montoro, D.T.; Haber, A.L.; Biton, M.; Vinarsky, V.; Lin, B.; Birket, S.E.; Yuan, F.; Chen, S.; Leung, H.M.; Villoria, J.; et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature 2018, 560, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zuo, W.-l.; Rostami, M.R.; Shenoy, S.A.; LeBlanc, M.G.; Salit, J.; Strulovici-Barel, Y.; O’Beirne, S.L.; Kaner, R.J.; Leopold, P.L.; Mezey, J.G.; et al. Cell-specific expression of lung disease risk-related genes in the human small airway epithelium. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rock, J.R.; Onaitis, M.W.; Rawlins, E.L.; Lu, Y.; Clark, C.P.; Xue, Y.; Randell, S.H.; Hogan, B.L. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12771–12775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Plasschaert, L.W.; Žilionis, R.; Choo-Wing, R.; Savova, V.; Knehr, J.; Roma, G.; Klein, A.M.; Jaffe, A.B. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 2018, 560, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shah, V.S.; Chivukula, R.R.; Lin, B.; Waghray, A.; Rajagopal, J. Cystic fibrosis and the cells of the airway epithelium: What are ionocytes and what do they do? Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2022, 17, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Branchfield, K.; Nantie, L.; Verheyden, J.M.; Sui, P.; Wienhold, M.D.; Sun, X. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells function as airway sensors to control lung immune response. Science 2016, 351, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ualiyeva, S.; Hallen, N.; Kanaoka, Y.; Ledderose, C.; Matsumoto, I.; Junger, W.G.; Barrett, N.A.; Bankova, L.G. Airway brush cells generate cysteinyl leukotrienes through the ATP sensor P2Y2. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eaax7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kimura, S.; Mutoh, M.; Hisamoto, M.; Saito, H.; Takahashi, S.; Asakura, T.; Ishii, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Iida, J.; Hase, K.; et al. Airway M cells arise in the lower airway due to RANKL signaling and reside in the bronchiolar epithelium associated with iBALT in murine models of respiratory disease. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mutoh, M.; Kimura, S.; Takahashi-Iwanaga, H.; Hisamoto, M.; Iwanaga, T.; Iida, J. RANKL regulates differentiation of microfold cells in mouse nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT). Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 364, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Nair, V.R.; Franco, L.H.; Zacharia, V.M.; Khan, H.S.; Stamm, C.E.; You, W.; Marciano, D.K.; Yagita, H.; Levine, B.; Shiloh, M.U. Microfold cells actively translocate Mycobacterium tuberculosis to initiate infection. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 1253–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Obar, J.J.; Hohl, T.M.; Cramer, R.A. New advances in invasive aspergillosis immunobiology leading the way towards personalized therapeutic approaches. Cytokine 2016, 84, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Margalit, A.; Kavanagh, K. The innate immune response to Aspergillus fumigatus at the alveolar surface. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 670–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lehmann, R.; Muller, M.M.; Klassert, T.E.; Driesch, D.; Stock, M.; Heinrich, A.; Conrad, T.; Moore, C.; Schier, U.K.; Guthke, R.; et al. Differential regulation of the transcriptomic and secretomic landscape of sensor and effector functions of human airway epithelial cells. Mucosal. Immunol. 2018, 11, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Desoubeaux, G.; Cray, C. Rodent models of invasive aspergillosis due to Aspergillus fumigatus: Still a long path toward standardization. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pappagianis, D. Evaluation of the protective efficacy of the killed Coccidioides immitis spherule vaccine in humans. The Valley Fever Vaccine Study Group. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1993, 148, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kawamoto, Y.; Morinaga, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Kaku, N.; Kosai, K.; Uno, N.; Hasegawa, H.; Yanagihara, K. TNF-alpha inhibits the growth of Legionella pneumophila in airway epithelial cells by inducing apoptosis. J. Infect. Chemother. 2017, 23, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, F.; Zhang, C.; Jia, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Tian, S.; Han, X.; Han, L. Transcriptome profiles of human lung epithelial cells A549 interacting with Aspergillus fumigatus by RNA-seq. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Oguma, T.; Asano, K.; Tomomatsu, K.; Kodama, M.; Fukunaga, K.; Shiomi, T.; Ohmori, N.; Ueda, S.; Takihara, T.; Shiraishi, Y.; et al. Induction of mucin and MUC5AC expression by the protease activity of Aspergillus fumigatus in airway epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 999–1005.e616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wiesner, D.L.; Merkhofer, R.M.; Ober, C.; Kujoth, G.C.; Niu, M.; Keller, N.P.; Gern, J.E.; Brockman-Schneider, R.A.; Evans, M.D.; Jackson, D.J.; et al. Club cell TRPV4 serves as a damage sensor driving lung allergic inflammation. Cell Host. Microbe 2020, 27, 614–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shen, B.Q.; Finkbeiner, W.E.; Wine, J.J.; Mrsny, R.J.; Widdicombe, J.H. Calu-3: A human airway epithelial cell line that shows cAMP-dependent Cl- secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 1994, 266, L493–L501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Grainger, C.I.; Greenwell, L.L.; Lockley, D.J.; Martin, G.P.; Forbes, B. Culture of Calu-3 cells at the air interface provides a representative model of the airway epithelial barrier. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ordonez, S.R.; van Eijk, M.; Escobar Salazar, N.; de Cock, H.; Veldhuizen, E.J.A.; Haagsman, H.P. Antifungal activities of surfactant protein D in an environment closely mimicking the lung lining. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 105, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaur, R.; Dennison, S.R.; Burrow, A.J.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Swami, R.; Gorki, V.; Katare, O.P.; Kaushik, A.; Singh, B.; Singh, K.K. Nebulised surface-active hybrid nanoparticles of voriconazole for pulmonary aspergillosis demonstrate clathrin-mediated cellular uptake, improved antifungal efficacy and lung retention. J. Nanobiotechnology 2021, 19, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Giard, D.J.; Aaronson, S.A.; Todaro, G.J.; Arnstein, P.; Kersey, J.H.; Dosik, H.; Parks, W.P. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: Establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J Natl. Cancer Inst. 1973, 51, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Reddel, R.R.; Ke, Y.; Gerwin, B.I.; McMenamin, M.G.; Lechner, J.F.; Su, R.T.; Brash, D.E.; Park, J.B.; Rhim, J.S.; Harris, C.C. Transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells by infection with SV40 or adenovirus-12 SV40 hybrid virus, or transfection via strontium phosphate coprecipitation with a plasmid containing SV40 early region genes. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 1904–1909. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lechner, J.F.; LaVeck, M.A. A serum-free method for culturing normal human bronchial epithelial cells at clonal density. J. Tissue Cult. Methods 1985, 9, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fogh, J.; Fogh, J.M.; Orfeo, T. One hundred and twenty-seven cultured human tumor cell lines producing tumors in nude mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1977, 59, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ramirez, R.D.; Sheridan, S.; Girard, L.; Sato, M.; Kim, Y.; Pollack, J.; Peyton, M.; Zou, Y.; Kurie, J.M.; Dimaio, J.M.; et al. Immortalization of human bronchial epithelial cells in the absence of viral oncoproteins. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 9027–9034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Carney, D.N.; Gazdar, A.F.; Bepler, G.; Guccion, J.G.; Marangos, P.J.; Moody, T.W.; Zweig, M.H.; Minna, J.D. Establishment and identification of small cell lung cancer cell lines having classic and variant features. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 2913–2923. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Cozens, A.L.; Yezzi, M.J.; Kunzelmann, K.; Ohrui, T.; Chin, L.; Eng, K.; Finkbeiner, W.E.; Widdicombe, J.H.; Gruenert, D.C. CFTR expression and chloride secretion in polarized immortal human bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1994, 10, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhao, F.; Klimecki, W.T. Culture conditions profoundly impact phenotype in BEAS-2B, a human pulmonary epithelial model. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Stewart, C.E.; Torr, E.E.; Mohd Jamili, N.H.; Bosquillon, C.; Sayers, I. Evaluation of differentiated human bronchial epithelial cell culture systems for asthma research. J. Allergy 2012, 2012, 943982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Han, X.; Na, T.; Wu, T.; Yuan, B.Z. Human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells exhibit characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Callaghan, P.J.; Ferrick, B.; Rybakovsky, E.; Thomas, S.; Mullin, J.M. Epithelial barrier function properties of the 16HBE14o- human bronchial epithelial cell culture model. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20201532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ferreira Lopes, S.; Vacher, G.; Ciarlo, E.; Savova-Bianchi, D.; Roger, T.; Niculita-Hirzel, H. Primary and immortalized human respiratory cells display different patterns of cytotoxicity and cytokine release upon exposure to deoxynivalenol, nivalenol and fusarenon-X. Toxins 2017, 9, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nakauchi, M.; Nagata, N.; Takayama, I.; Saito, S.; Kubo, H.; Kaida, A.; Oba, K.; Odagiri, T.; Kageyama, T. Propagation of rhinovirus C in differentiated immortalized human airway HBEC3-KT epithelial cells. Viruses 2019, 11, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bianchi, M.; Sivarajan, R.; Walles, T.; Hackenberg, S.; Steinke, M. Susceptibility of primary human airway epithelial cells to Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase toxin in two- and three-dimensional culture conditions. Innate Immun. 2021, 27, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, I.C.; Wang, S.C.; Chen, Y.T.; Tseng, H.H.; Liu, P.L.; Lin, T.C.; Wu, H.E.; Chen, Y.R.; Tseng, Y.H.; Hsu, J.H.; et al. Corylin ameliorates LPS-induced acute lung injury via suppressing the MAPKs and IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathways. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, X.; Ory, V.; Chapman, S.; Yuan, H.; Albanese, C.; Kallakury, B.; Timofeeva, O.A.; Nealon, C.; Dakic, A.; Simic, V.; et al. ROCK Inhibitor and Feeder Cells Induce the Conditional Reprogramming of Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 180, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Rheinwald, J.; Green, H. Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: The formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 1975, 6, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mou, H.; Vinarsky, V.; Tata, P.R.; Brazauskas, K.; Choi, S.H.; Crooke, A.K.; Zhang, B.; Solomon, G.M.; Turner, B.; Bihler, H.; et al. Dual SMAD signaling inhibition enables long-term expansion of diverse epithelial basal cells. Cell Stem. Cell 2016, 19, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Feldman, M.B.; Wood, M.; Lapey, A.; Mou, H. SMAD signaling restricts mucous cell differentiation in human airway epithelium. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 61, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Feldman, M.B.; Dutko, R.A.; Wood, M.A.; Ward, R.A.; Leung, H.M.; Snow, R.F.; De La Flor, D.J.; Yonker, L.M.; Reedy, J.L.; Tearney, G.J.; et al. Aspergillus fumigatus cell wall promotes apical airway epithelial recruitment of human neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 2020, 88, e00813–e00819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yonker, L.M.; Marand, A.; Muldur, S.; Hopke, A.; Leung, H.M.; De La Flor, D.; Park, G.; Pinsky, H.; Guthrie, L.B.; Tearney, G.J.; et al. Neutrophil dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2021, 20, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Choi, W.; Yang, A.X.; Sieve, A.; Kuo, S.H.; Mudalagiriyappa, S.; Vieson, M.; Maddox, C.W.; Nanjappa, S.G.; Lau, G.W. Pulmonary mycosis drives forkhead box protein A2 degradation and mucus hypersecretion through activation of the spleen tyrosine kinase-epidermal growth factor receptor-AKT/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling. Am. J. Pathol. 2021, 191, 108–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hernández-Santos, N.; Wiesner, D.L.; Fites, J.S.; McDermott, A.J.; Warner, T.; Wüthrich, M.; Klein, B.S. Lung epithelial cells coordinate innate lymphocytes and immunity against pulmonary fungal infection. Cell Host. Microbe 2018, 23, 511–522.e515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kradin, R.L.; Mark, E.J. The pathology of pulmonary disorders due to Aspergillus spp. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008, 132, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Amitani, R.; Taylor, G.; Elezis, E.N.; Llewellyn-Jones, C.; Mitchell, J.; Kuze, F.; Cole, P.J.; Wilson, R. Purification and characterization of factors produced by Aspergillus fumigatus which affect human ciliated respiratory epithelium. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 3266–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Karnak, D.; Avery, R.K.; Gildea, T.R.; Sahoo, D.; Mehta, A.C. Endobronchial fungal disease: An under-recognized entity. Respiration 2007, 74, 88–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kato, K.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Kai, H.; Kim, K.C. MUC1 expression by human airway epithelial cells mediates Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2010, 2, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kato, K.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Lu, W.; Kim, K.C. MUC1: The first respiratory mucin with an anti-inflammatory function. J. Clin. Med. 2017, 6, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Liu, Y.; Davis, A.S.; Ma, L.; Bishop, L.; Cissé, O.H.; Kutty, G.; Kovacs, J.A. MUC1 mediates Pneumocystis murina binding to airway epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2020, 22, e13182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Basu, T.; Seyedmousavi, S.; Sugui, J.A.; Balenga, N.; Zhao, M.; Kwon Chung, K.J.; Biardel, S.; Laviolette, M.; Druey, K.M. Aspergillus fumigatus alkaline protease 1 (Alp1/Asp f13) in the airways correlates with asthma severity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 423–425.e427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Namvar, S.; Warn, P.; Farnell, E.; Bromley, M.; Fraczek, M.; Bowyer, P.; Herrick, S. Aspergillus fumigatus proteases, Asp f 5 and Asp f 13, are essential for airway inflammation and remodelling in a murine inhalation model. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Homma, T.; Kato, A.; Bhushan, B.; Norton, J.E.; Suh, L.A.; Carter, R.G.; Gupta, D.S.; Schleimer, R.P. Role of Aspergillus fumigatus in triggering protease-activated receptor-2 in airway epithelial cells and skewing the cells toward a T-helper 2 bias. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 2016, 54, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, F.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Han, X.; Sun, Y.; Han, L. Gliotoxin destructs the pulmonary epithelium barrier function by reducing cofilin oligomer formation to promote the dissolution of actin stress fibers. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 123, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ballard, E.; Yucel, R.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Brown, A.J.P.; Verweij, P.E.; Warris, A. Antifungal activity of antimicrobial peptides and proteins against Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Alekseeva, L.; Huet, D.; Féménia, F.; Mouyna, I.; Abdelouahab, M.; Cagna, A.; Guerrier, D.; Tichanné-Seltzer, V.; Baeza-Squiban, A.; Chermette, R.; et al. Inducible expression of beta defensins by human respiratory epithelial cells exposed to Aspergillus fumigatus organisms. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Singh, A.; Ahmad, N.; Varadarajan, A.; Vikram, N.; Singh, T.P.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, P. Lactoferrin, a potential iron-chelator as an adjunct treatment for mucormycosis—A comprehensive review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 988–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Smole, U.; Kratzer, B.; Pickl, W.F. Soluble pattern recognition molecules: Guardians and regulators of homeostasis at airway mucosal surfaces. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 624–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Koh, S.H.; Shin, S.G.; Andrade, M.J.; Go, R.H.; Park, S.; Woo, C.H.; Lim, J.H. Long pentraxin PTX3 mediates acute inflammatory responses against pneumococcal infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 493, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. D’Angelo, C.; De Luca, A.; Zelante, T.; Bonifazi, P.; Moretti, S.; Giovannini, G.; Iannitti, R.G.; Zagarella, S.; Bozza, S.; Campo, S.; et al. Exogenous pentraxin 3 restores antifungal resistance and restrains inflammation in murine chronic granulomatous disease. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 4609–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Cunha, C.; Aversa, F.; Lacerda, J.F.; Busca, A.; Kurzai, O.; Grube, M.; Löffler, J.; Maertens, J.A.; Bell, A.S.; Inforzato, A.; et al. Genetic PTX3 deficiency and aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kabbani, D.; Bhaskaran, A.; Singer, L.G.; Bhimji, A.; Rotstein, C.; Keshavjee, S.; Liles, W.C.; Husain, S. Pentraxin 3 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of lung transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis. J. Heart Lung. Transplant. 2017, 36, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lambourne, J.; Agranoff, D.; Herbrecht, R.; Troke, P.F.; Buchbinder, A.; Willis, F.; Letscher-Bru, V.; Agrawal, S.; Doffman, S.; Johnson, E.; et al. Association of mannose-binding lectin deficiency with acute invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1486–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ampel, N.M.; Dionne, S.O.; Giblin, A.; Podany, A.B.; Galgiani, J. Mannose-binding lectin serum levels are low in persons with clinically active coccidioidomycosis. Mycopathologia 2009, 167, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yanagisawa, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Uchiumi, H.; Gohda, F.; Mawatari, M.; Ishizaki, T.; Mitsui, T.; Yokohama, A.; Handa, H.; Tsukamoto, N.; et al. Gene polymorphisms of mannose-binding lectin confer susceptibility to Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV-infected patients. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Pottratz, S.T.; Weir, A.L.; Wisniowski, P.E. Pneumocystis carinii attachment increases expression of fibronectin-binding integrins on cultured lung cells. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 5464–5469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Almeida, B.R.; Barros, B.; Araújo, A.C.L.; Alcantara, C.; Suzuki, E. Paracoccidioides species present distinct fungal adherence to epithelial lung cells and promote different IL-8 secretion levels. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, H.; Lee, M.J.; Solis, N.V.; Phan, Q.T.; Swidergall, M.; Ralph, B.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Sheppard, D.C.; Filler, S.G. Aspergillus fumigatus CalA binds to integrin α(5)β(1) and mediates host cell invasion. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Alqarihi, A.; Gebremariam, T.; Gu, Y.; Swidergall, M.; Alkhazraji, S.; Soliman, S.S.M.; Bruno, V.M.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G.; Uppuluri, P.; et al. GRP78 and integrins play different roles in host cell invasion during mucormycosis. mBio 2020, 11, e01087-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Watkins, T.N.; Gebremariam, T.; Swidergall, M.; Shetty, A.C.; Graf, K.T.; Alqarihi, A.; Alkhazraji, S.; Alsaadi, A.I.; Edwards, V.L.; Filler, S.G.; et al. Inhibition of EGFR signaling protects from mucormycosis. mBio 2018, 9, e01384-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Han, X.; Su, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, C.; Yang, F.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; et al. Complement receptor 3 mediates Aspergillus fumigatus internalization into alveolar epithelial cells with the increase of intracellular phosphatidic acid by activating FAK. Virulence 2021, 12, 1980–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. McClure, R.; Massari, P. TLR-dependent human mucosal epithelial cell responses to microbial pathogens. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Jepsen, C.S.; Dubey, L.K.; Colmorten, K.B.; Moeller, J.B.; Hammond, M.A.; Nielsen, O.; Schlosser, A.; Templeton, S.P.; Sorensen, G.L.; Holmskov, U. FIBCD1 binds Aspergillus fumigatus and regulates lung epithelial response to cell wall components. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Sun, W.K.; Lu, X.; Li, X.; Sun, Q.Y.; Su, X.; Song, Y.; Sun, H.M.; Shi, Y. Dectin-1 is inducible and plays a crucial role in Aspergillus-induced innate immune responses in human bronchial epithelial cells. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 31, 2755–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Heyl, K.A.; Klassert, T.E.; Heinrich, A.; Müller, M.M.; Klaile, E.; Dienemann, H.; Grünewald, C.; Bals, R.; Singer, B.B.; Slevogt, H. Dectin-1 is expressed in human lung and mediates the proinflammatory immune response to nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. mBio 2014, 5, e01492-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ben-Ghazzi, N.; Moreno-Velásquez, S.; Seidel, C.; Thomson, D.; Denning, D.W.; Read, N.D.; Bowyer, P.; Gago, S. Characterisation of Aspergillus fumigatus endocytic trafficking within airway epithelial cells using high-resolution automated quantitative confocal microscopy. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Culibrk, L.; Croft, C.A.; Toor, A.; Yang, S.J.; Singhera, G.K.; Dorscheid, D.R.; Moore, M.M.; Tebbutt, S.J. Phagocytosis of Aspergillus fumigatus by human bronchial epithelial cells is mediated by the Arp2/3 complex and WIPF2. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Rammaert, B.; Jouvion, G.; de Chaumont, F.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Szczepaniak, C.; Renaudat, C.; Olivo-Marin, J.C.; Chrétien, F.; Dromer, F.; Bretagne, S. Absence of fungal spore internalization by bronchial epithelium in mouse models evidenced by a new bioimaging approach and transmission electronic microscopy. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 2421–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Merkel, G.J.; Scofield, B.A. The in vitro interaction of Cryptococcus neoformans with human lung epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1997, 19, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Guillot, L.; Carroll, S.F.; Badawy, M.; Qureshi, S.T. Cryptococcus neoformans induces IL-8 secretion and CXCL1 expression by human bronchial epithelial cells. Respir. Res. 2008, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Pereira, A.B.M.; Oliveira, J.R.; Souza, A.L.J.; Andrade-Silva, L.; Silva, M.V.; Silva, P.R.; Silva-Vergara, M.L.; Rogerio, A.P. Effects of cigarette smoke extract on bronchial epithelial cells stimulated with Cryptococcus neoformans. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2021, 210, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Seidel, C.; Moreno-Velásquez, S.D.; Ben-Ghazzi, N.; Gago, S.; Read, N.D.; Bowyer, P. Phagolysosomal survival enables non-lytic hyphal escape and ramification through lung epithelium during Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Fernandes, J.; Hamidi, F.; Leborgne, R.; Beau, R.; Castier, Y.; Mordant, P.; Boukkerou, A.; Latgé, J.P.; Pretolani, M. Penetration of the human pulmonary epithelium by Aspergillus fumigatus hyphae. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 1306–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Toor, A.; Culibrk, L.; Singhera, G.K.; Moon, K.M.; Prudova, A.; Foster, L.J.; Moore, M.M.; Dorscheid, D.R.; Tebbutt, S.J. Transcriptomic and proteomic host response to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia in an air-liquid interface model of human bronchial epithelium. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Fekkar, A.; Balloy, V.; Pionneau, C.; Marinach-Patrice, C.; Chignard, M.; Mazier, D. Secretome of human bronchial epithelial cells in response to the fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus analyzed by differential in-gel electrophoresis. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Benfield, T.L.; Lundgren, B.; Shelhamer, J.H.; Lundgren, J.D. Pneumocystis carinii major surface glycoprotein induces interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 release from a human alveolar epithelial cell line. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 29, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Barbosa, F.M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Holandino, C.; Alviano, C.S.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. Glucuronoxylomannan-mediated interaction of Cryptococcus neoformans with human alveolar cells results in fungal internalization and host cell damage. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Barbosa, F.M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Figueiredo, R.T.; Bozza, M.T.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. Binding of glucuronoxylomannan to the CD14 receptor in human A549 alveolar cells induces interleukin-8 production. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. de Barros, B.; Almeida, B.R.; Suzuki, E. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis downmodulates α3 integrin levels in human lung epithelial cells in a TLR2-dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. de Oliveira, P.; Juliano, M.A.; Tanaka, A.S.; Carmona, A.K.; Dos Santos, S.M.; de Barros, B.C.; Maza, P.K.; Puccia, R.; Suzuki, E. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis induces cytokine secretion in epithelial cells in a protease-activated receptor-dependent (PAR) manner. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 206, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Han, L.; Sun, Q.; Han, X. Aspergillus fumigatus induces the release of IL-8 and MCP-1 by activating nuclear transcription through dectin-1 and CR3 receptors in alveolar epithelial cells. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 3474–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Souza, H.I.; Pereira, A.B.M.; Oliveira, J.R.; Silva, P.R.; Teixeira, D.N.S.; Silva-Vergara, M.L.; Rogério, A.P. Cryptococcus neoformans in association with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus has pro-(IL-6/STAT3 overproduction) and anti-inflammatory (CCL2/ERK1/2 downregulation) effects on human bronchial epithelial cells. Inflammation 2022, 45, 1269–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bonnett, C.R.; Cornish, E.J.; Harmsen, A.G.; Burritt, J.B. Early neutrophil recruitment and aggregation in the murine lung inhibit germination of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 6528–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Rowley, J.; Namvar, S.; Gago, S.; Labram, B.; Bowyer, P.; Richardson, M.D.; Herrick, S.E. Differential proinflammatory responses to Aspergillus fumigatus by airway epithelial cells in vitro are protease dependent. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kottom, T.J.; Carmona, E.M.; Limper, A.H. Gene expression in lung epithelial cells following interaction with Pneumocystis carinii and its specific life forms yields insights into host gene responses to infection. Microbiol. Immunol. 2022, 66, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Morton, C.O.; Fliesser, M.; Dittrich, M.; Mueller, T.; Bauer, R.; Kneitz, S.; Hope, W.; Rogers, T.R.; Einsele, H.; Loeffler, J. Gene expression profiles of human dendritic cells interacting with Aspergillus fumigatus in a bilayer model of the alveolar epithelium/endothelium interface. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Belic, S.; Page, L.; Lazariotou, M.; Waaga-Gasser, A.M.; Dragan, M.; Springer, J.; Loeffler, J.; Morton, C.O.; Einsele, H.; Ullmann, A.J.; et al. Comparative analysis of inflammatory cytokine release and alveolar epithelial barrier invasion in a Transwell® bilayer model of mucormycosis. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Zelante, T.; Wong, A.Y.; Ping, T.J.; Chen, J.; Sumatoh, H.R.; Viganò, E.; Hong Bing, Y.; Lee, B.; Zolezzi, F.; Fric, J.; et al. CD103(+) dendritic cells control Th17 cell function in the lung. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1789–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Panda, S.K.; Colonna, M. Innate lymphoid cells in mucosal immunity. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Kindermann, M.; Knipfer, L.; Obermeyer, S.; Müller, U.; Alber, G.; Bogdan, C.; Schleicher, U.; Neurath, M.F.; Wirtz, S. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) suppress beneficial type 1 immune responses during pulmonary cryptococcosis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Gladiator, A.; Wangler, N.; Trautwein-Weidner, K.; LeibundGut-Landmann, S. Cutting edge: IL-17-secreting innate lymphoid cells are essential for host defense against fungal infection. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Flaczyk, A.; Duerr, C.U.; Shourian, M.; Lafferty, E.I.; Fritz, J.H.; Qureshi, S.T. IL-33 signaling regulates innate and adaptive immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Heyen, L.; Müller, U.; Siegemund, S.; Schulze, B.; Protschka, M.; Alber, G.; Piehler, D. Lung epithelium is the major source of IL-33 and is regulated by IL-33-dependent and IL-33-independent mechanisms in pulmonary cryptococcosis. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Carreto-Binaghi, L.E.; Tenorio, E.P.; Morales-Villarreal, F.R.; Aliouat, E.M.; Zenteno, E.; Martínez-Orozco, J.A.; Taylor, M.L. Detection of cytokines and collectins in bronchoalveolar fluid samples of patients infected with Histoplasma capsulatum and Pneumocystis jirovecii. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sánchez-Maldonado, J.M.; Moñiz-Díez, A.; Ter Horst, R.; Campa, D.; Cabrera-Serrano, A.J.; Martínez-Bueno, M.; Garrido-Collado, M.D.P.; Hernández-Mohedo, F.; Fernández-Puerta, L.; López-Nevot, M.; et al. Polymorphisms within the TNFSF4 and MAPKAPK2 loci influence the risk of developing invasive aspergillosis: A two-stage case control study in the context of the aspBIOmics consortium. J. Fungi 2020, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Rivera, A.; Ro, G.; Van Epps, H.L.; Simpson, T.; Leiner, I.; Sant’Angelo, D.B.; Pamer, E.G. Innate immune activation and CD4+ T cell priming during respiratory fungal infection. Immunity 2006, 25, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Bhushan, B.; Homma, T.; Norton, J.E.; Sha, Q.; Siebert, J.; Gupta, D.S.; Schroeder, J.W., Jr.; Schleimer, R.P. Suppression of epithelial signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 activation by extracts of Aspergillus fumigatus. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 2015, 53, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Nicolas de Lamballerie, C.; Pizzorno, A.; Fouret, J.; Szpiro, L.; Padey, B.; Dubois, J.; Julien, T.; Traversier, A.; Dulière, V.; Brun, P.; et al. Transcriptional profiling of immune and inflammatory responses in the context of SARS-CoV-2 fungal superinfection in a human airway epithelial model. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kobayashi, N.; Takahashi, D.; Takano, S.; Kimura, S.; Hase, K. The roles of Peyer’s patches and microfold cells in the gut immune system: Relevance to autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Mabbott, N.A.; Donaldson, D.S.; Ohno, H.; Williams, I.R.; Mahajan, A. Microfold (M) cells: Important immunosurveillance posts in the intestinal epithelium. Mucosal. Immunol. 2013, 6, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Khan, H.S.; Nair, V.R.; Ruhl, C.R.; Alvarez-Arguedas, S.; Galvan Rendiz, J.L.; Franco, L.H.; Huang, L.; Shaul, P.W.; Kim, J.; Xie, Y.; et al. Identification of scavenger receptor B1 as the airway microfold cell receptor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Elife 2020, 9, e52551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Albac, S.; Schmitz, A.; Lopez-Alayon, C.; d’Enfert, C.; Sautour, M.; Ducreux, A.; Labruère-Chazal, C.; Laue, M.; Holland, G.; Bonnin, A.; et al. Candida albicans is able to use M cells as a portal of entry across the intestinal barrier in vitro. Cell Microbiol. 2016, 18, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Baughman, R.P.; Kim, C.K.; Vinegar, A.; Hendricks, D.E.; Schmidt, D.J.; Bullock, W.E. The pathogenesis of experimental pulmonary histoplasmosis. Correlative studies of histopathology, bronchoalveolar lavage, and respiratory function. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1986, 134, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Eddens, T.; Elsegeiny, W.; Garcia-Hernadez, M.L.; Castillo, P.; Trevejo-Nunez, G.; Serody, K.; Campfield, B.T.; Khader, S.A.; Chen, K.; Rangel-Moreno, J.; et al. Pneumocystis-driven inducible bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue formation requires Th2 and Th17 immunity. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 3078–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Li, L.X.; Hole, C.R.; Rangel-Moreno, J.; Khader, S.A.; Doering, T.L. Cryptococcus neoformans evades pulmonary immunity by modulating xylose precursor transport. Infect. Immun. 2020, 88, e00288-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Moyron-Quiroz, J.E.; Rangel-Moreno, J.; Kusser, K.; Hartson, L.; Sprague, F.; Goodrich, S.; Woodland, D.L.; Lund, F.E.; Randall, T.D. Role of inducible bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (iBALT) in respiratory immunity. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tan, H.X.; Esterbauer, R.; Vanderven, H.A.; Juno, J.A.; Kent, S.J.; Wheatley, A.K. Inducible bronchus-associated lymphoid tissues (iBALT) serve as sites of B cell selection and maturation following influenza infection in mice. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Sell, S.; Guest, I.; McKinstry, K.K.; Strutt, T.M.; Kohlmeier, J.E.; Brincks, E.; Tighe, M.; Blackman, M.A.; Woodland, D.L.; Dutton, R.W.; et al. Intraepithelial T-cell cytotoxicity, induced bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue, and proliferation of pneumocytes in experimental mouse models of influenza. Viral Immunol. 2014, 27, 484–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Kusek, M.E.; Pazos, M.A.; Pirzai, W.; Hurley, B.P. In vitro coculture assay to assess pathogen induced neutrophil trans-epithelial migration. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 83, e50823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Deng, Y.; Herbert, J.A.; Robinson, E.; Ren, L.; Smyth, R.L.; Smith, C.M. Neutrophil-airway epithelial interactions result in increased epithelial damage and viral clearance during respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e02161-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Kroes, M.M.; Miranda-Bedate, A.; Jacobi, R.H.J.; van Woudenbergh, E.; den Hartog, G.; van Putten, J.P.M.; de Wit, J.; Pinelli, E. Bordetella pertussis-infected innate immune cells drive the anti-pertussis response of human airway epithelium. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Haghi, M.; Hittinger, M.; Zeng, Q.; Oliver, B.; Traini, D.; Young, P.M.; Huwer, H.; Schneider-Daum, N.; Lehr, C.M. Mono- and cocultures of bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells respond differently to proinflammatory stimuli and their modulation by salbutamol and budesonide. Mol. Pharm. 2015, 12, 2625–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ugonna, K.; Bingle, C.D.; Plant, K.; Wilson, K.; Everard, M.L. Macrophages are required for dendritic cell uptake of respiratory syncytial virus from an infected epithelium. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the known responses of human airway epithelium to invading fungal pathogens.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the known responses of human airway epithelium to invading fungal pathogens.
Jof 09 00040 g001
Table 1. Common pulmonary fungal infections. ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CF = cystic fibrosis; CPA = chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; COPD = chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease; IPA = invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; PCP = Pneumocystis pneumonia; CM = coccidioidomycosis; PCM = paracoccidioidomycosis.
Table 1. Common pulmonary fungal infections. ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CF = cystic fibrosis; CPA = chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; COPD = chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease; IPA = invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; PCP = Pneumocystis pneumonia; CM = coccidioidomycosis; PCM = paracoccidioidomycosis.
DiseaseFungal Species (**Most Common)High-Risk
Populations for
Severe Disease
Global PrevalenceMortality RatesRef
ABPA *Aspergillus fumigatusAsthma4.8 million10–30%[3,4]
CF
CPA *A. fumigatus **
A. niger, A. flavus, A. nidulans, A. terreus
Chronic lung disease (COPD, CF, asthma), prior mycobacterial infection, ABPA3 million7–80%[5,6]
IPA *A. fumigatus **
A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus
Neutropenia, hematopoietic stem-cell or organ transplant, critically ill, chronic corticosteroid treatment, AIDS250,00040–90%[7,8]
Acute
Community-
Acquired
Pneumonia *
A. fumigatusPrior viral infection (influenza, SARS-CoV-2), COPD1–34% of severe viral infections~50%[9,10]
Pulmonary Cryptococcosis *Cryptococcus neoformans, C. gattiiHIV, organ transplantation, malignancies, immuno-suppressive therapy, diabetes223,00020–55%[11]
PJP (previously PCP) *Pneumocystis jiroveciiHIV/AIDS, immune-
suppressive medications (e.g., corticosteroids)
500,00010–50%[12,13]
Pulmonary Mucormycosis *Rhizopus spp., Mucor spp., Lichtheimia spp.Cancer, diabetes mellitus, hematopoietic stem cell or organ transplant>10,00038–82%[14]
Blastomycosis #Blastomyces dermatitidis; B. gilchristiiHIV, organ transplantation, immunomodulatory therapy1–40 cases per 100,000 (in endemic areas)50%[15]
CM/Valley Fever #Coccidioides immitis
C. posadasii
HIV, organ transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, diabetes, pregnancy, older age20,0001–88%[16]
Histoplasmosis #Histoplasma capsulatumHIV, organ transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, infancy, older age100,0005–8%[17]
PCM #Paracoccidioides brasiliensis; P. lutziiMen; individuals in South America15,0006–10%[18,19]
* Opportunistic infection; # Endemic infection.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crossen, A.J.; Ward, R.A.; Reedy, J.L.; Surve, M.V.; Klein, B.S.; Rajagopal, J.; Vyas, J.M. Human Airway Epithelium Responses to Invasive Fungal Infections: A Critical Partner in Innate Immunity. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010040

AMA Style

Crossen AJ, Ward RA, Reedy JL, Surve MV, Klein BS, Rajagopal J, Vyas JM. Human Airway Epithelium Responses to Invasive Fungal Infections: A Critical Partner in Innate Immunity. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crossen, Arianne J., Rebecca A. Ward, Jennifer L. Reedy, Manalee V. Surve, Bruce S. Klein, Jayaraj Rajagopal, and Jatin M. Vyas. 2023. "Human Airway Epithelium Responses to Invasive Fungal Infections: A Critical Partner in Innate Immunity" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop