Next Article in Journal
Unusual Case of Biliary Peritonitis in a Dog Secondary to a Gastric Perforation
Next Article in Special Issue
Invasive Bacterial Infections of the Musculoskeletal and Central Nervous System during Pig Rearing: Detection Frequencies of Different Pathogens and Specific Streptococcus suis Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance between 2020 and 2021 of All Mammalian Species in Two Flemish Zoos (Antwerp Zoo and Planckendael Zoo)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Host PTX3 Protein and Bacterial Capsule Coordinately Regulate the Inflammatory Response during Streptococcus suis Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/vetsci10060383
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Universal Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Streptococcus suis Infections Using Immunoinformatics Approaches

by
Yumin Zhang
†,
Guoqing Zhao
†,
Yangjing Xiong
,
Feiyu Li
,
Yifan Chen
,
Yuqiang Cheng
,
Jingjiao Ma
,
Henan Wang
,
Yaxian Yan
,
Zhaofei Wang
* and
Jianhe Sun
*
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(6), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060383
Submission received: 25 March 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Streptococcus in Veterinary Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Streptococcus suis has been receiving increasing attention due to its involvement in severe human infections worldwide. However, there is currently no licensed vaccine against S. suis. Therefore, vaccine development is very essential to eliminate the threat of this human pathogen. Herein, we contrived a multi-epitope subunit vaccine against S. suis isolates of multiple serotypes using immunoinformatics. Further, the characteristics of the designed vaccine were evaluated using several analyses, including antigenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, and tertiary structure analyses and molecular docking; the results indicated that it could be an effective universal vaccine against S. suis infections.

Abstract

Streptococcus suis is a significant zoonotic pathogen that is a great threat not only to the swine industry but also to human health, causing arthritis, meningitis, and even streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome. Owing to its many serotypes and high geographic variability, an efficacious cross-protective S. suis vaccine is not readily available. Therefore, this study aimed to design a universal multi-epitope vaccine (MVHP6) that involved three highly immunogenic proteins of S. suis, namely, the surface antigen containing a glycosaminoglycan binding domain (HP0197), endopeptidase (PepO), and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD). Forecasted T-cell and B-cell epitopes with high antigenic properties and a suitable adjuvant were linked to construct a multi-epitope vaccine. In silico analysis showed that the selected epitopes were conserved in highly susceptible serotypes for humans. Thereafter, we evaluated the different parameters of MVHP6 and showed that MVHP6 was highly antigenic, non-toxic, and non-allergenic. To verify whether the vaccine could display appropriate epitopes and maintain high stability, the MVHP6 tertiary structure was modeled, refined, and validated. Molecular docking studies revealed a strong binding interaction between the vaccine and the toll-like receptor (TLR4), whereas molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated the vaccine’s compatibility, binding stability, and structural compactness. Moreover, the in silico analysis showed that MVHP6 could evoke strong immune responses and enable worldwide population coverage. Moreover, MVHP6 was cloned into the pET28a (+) vector in silico to ensure the credibility, validation, and proper expression of the vaccine construct. The findings suggested that the proposed multi-epitope vaccine can provide cross-protection against S. suis infections.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus suis (S. suis), an encapsulated, potentially pathogenic, gram-positive bacterium, is one of the resident flora of pig tonsils [1]. It possesses high phenotypic heterogeneity with at least 29 serotypes, described based on the immunogenicity of capsular polysaccharide (CPS), and 1003 sequence types, described based on the seven housekeeping genes. S. suis is widespread across pig farms worldwide and responsible for systemic infections, including septicemia and meningitis, and even sudden death, thereby causing considerable financial losses to the livestock industry [2]. Moreover, S. suis is a newly emerging zoonotic agent capable of causing conditions ranging from mild illness to severe health problems, including streptococcal toxic-shock-like syndrome in humans [3,4]. The occurrences of two major S. suis infections, resulting in high mortality rates among humans in the provinces of Jiangsu and Sichuan, China, have attracted great attention [5,6]. Currently, S. suis infections in humans are also frequently reported in Southeast Asia [7]. Intriguingly, among the various serotypes, the serotypes 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 16, 24, and 31 are potentially transmitted from pigs to humans [7].
Antibiotic overuse by farmers has increased antimicrobial resistance in S. suis, posing a challenge to clinical medication for infected persons [8,9]. Therefore, owing to the presence of various serotypes as well as the escalating drug resistance in S. suis, it has become necessary to develop a universal vaccine that can provide cross-protection against S. suis infections for humans, particularly certain populations (such as veterinarians and butchers) who are at high risk of exposure to diseased pigs or pork products [10].
There are currently no universally efficacious commercial vaccines against S. suis infections. S. suis outbreak prevention in a particular farm is mainly achieved through autogenous (bacterins) vaccines; however, vaccine cross-protection between different strains is limited and data regarding vaccine safety are lacking [10]. In the past two decades, various immunogenic proteins that are highly conserved across different serotypes have been shown to elicit immune responses in animal models [11,12,13,14]. The development of a vaccine composed of multiple protein antigens is probably an attractive strategy to control infections caused by a broad range of serotypes through the targeting of several important virulence factors [15,16]. Recently, Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis vectors delivering conserved surface proteins have provided cross-protection against the S. suis serotypes 2, 7, 9, and ½ in mice [17].
With the development of modern vaccinology and immunoinformatics, the use of the multi-epitope vaccine is a good strategy to combine multiple proteins, owing to the vaccine’s cost-effectiveness, safety, potential for rational epitope design to amplify efficacy, and ability to cover a broader spectrum of serotypes. At present, the multiple-epitope vaccine approach has been shown to be promising against- SARS-CoV-2 [18], coxsackievirus B [17], Toxoplasma gondii [19], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [20], and Staphylococcus aureus [21]. Herein, we developed a universal multi-epitope vaccine candidate against S. suis based on multiple conserved proteins using advanced bioinformatics tools. To this end, three immunogenic proteins of S. suis, namely, HP0197 [22], PepO [23], and 6PGD [24], which are surface proteins and highly conserved in S suis, were employed for epitope prediction. Notably, immunogenic proteins were selected as their ability to confer varying levels of immune protection in both mice and pigs has been confirmed using experimental data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Retrieval of Protein Sequences

To conduct this project, HP0197, PepO, and 6PGD were employed as candidate antigenic proteins to predict epitopes, which are the major components of the multi-epitope vaccine. The protein sequences were retrieved from NCBI with Genbank ID, ABP91355.1 (HP0197), ABP89124.1 (PepO), and ABP92903.1 (6PGD). The VaxiJen 2.0 server was employed to predict the antigenicity scores of the candidate proteins [25].

2.2. Prediction of B-Cell (BCL) Epitopes

In this project, the ABCpred server was used to predict specific B-cell epitopes of three candidate proteins [26]. The score threshold and the amino acid length were fixed at 0.85 and 16, respectively, in this work. In addition, the antigenicity of the predicted B-cell epitopes was further tested by the VaxiJen v2.0 server. The epitopes with an antigenicity threshold above 0.85 were selected. The allergenicity and toxicity predictions of epitopes were performed through the Allertop 2.0 server [27] and Toxinpred server [28], respectively.

2.3. Predictions of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte (CTL) Epitopes

The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) webserver was utilized to predict CTL epitopes [29]. The IEDB MHC-I immunogenicity tool was utilized for the identification of immunogenicity [30]. The epitopes with an immunogenicity of more than 0.3 were readied for further analysis.

2.4. Predictions of Helper T-Lymphocyte (HTL) Epitopes

In this study, the HTL epitopes were predicted using IEDB MHC-II [31]. We used a seven-allele HLA reference set and IEBD recommended 2.22 predicted method to predict HTL epitopes. Further, the epitopes provided in the previous step were evaluated and screened based on their antigenicity and cytokine-inducing abilities through the IFN epitope [32], IL4pred [33], and IL10pred [34] servers, respectively.

2.5. Predicted Epitopes Conservation Analysis

To explore the conservation of selected epitopes, the analysis was performed using the local blast software. Firstly, 30 S. suis strains, including 3–5 strains of S. suis from each serotype potentially infecting humans, were retrieved from Genbank in the FASTA format and established a nucleic acid database. Then, the amino acid sequences of the selected epitopes were then subjected to tBLASTn analysis to search for similarity with default parameters. Subsequently, BacWGSTdb (http://bacdb.cn/BacWGSTdb/index.php, accessed on 26 November 2022) was used to conduct a phylogenetic tree of the selected 30 strains based on SNP strategy, and their MLST types were counted. The phylogenetic tree was landscaped through Chiplot (https://www.chiplot.online/tvbot.html, accessed on 7 December 2022).

2.6. Multiple-Epitope Vaccine Designing and Processing

The epitopes were fused by linkers, AAY, KK, and GPGPG, which are commonly used in vaccine construction. The order of the epitopes was linked according to the hydropathicity, which could be calculated by the ExPasy [35]. The N-terminus of this epitope fusion sequence was adjuvanted with 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 (NCBI ID: P9WHE3), a toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist, via the EAAAK linker.

2.7. Prediction, Refinement, and Validation of the Tertiary Structure

The I-TASSER server was utilized to model the initial 3D structure of the designed vaccine [36]. Further, the 3D model with the highest score from I-TASSER was submitted to the GalaxyRefine server to refine the initial 3D structure [37]. In addition, the ProSA-web, ERRAT and PROCHECK servers were employed to assess and validate the quality of the modeled or refined 3D structures of the vaccine [38,39,40].

2.8. Population Coverage

Based on the Allele Frequency Net Database, the IEDB population coverage analysis tool measures the population coverage of corresponding epitopes by targeted HLA allele genotypic frequencies [41]. Hence, to check the population coverage of the vaccine designed in this study, shortlisted epitopes, along with their corresponding identified HLA allele types, were submitted to the tool.

2.9. Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation

To check the binding affinity of the designed vaccines to immune receptors, in this study we performed a molecular docking analysis between the vaccine construct and several immune receptors [42], including Toll-like receptors such as TLR2 (PDB: 2Z7X) and TLR4 (PDB: 4G8A), and major histocompatibility complex molecules such as MHC-I (PDB: 4U6Y) and MHC-II (PBD: 5JLZ). The PDBsum server was utilized for vaccine–receptor contact analysis [43], while structural illustrations were visualized through the PyMOL. Moreover, to evaluate the stability of the vaccine–receptor binding complex, the iMOD server was employed to perform a molecular dynamics analysis [44].

2.10. Immune Response Simulation

To assess the vaccine’s potential immunological response to the vaccine, we submitted the entire sequence of the vaccine construct MVHP6 to the C-IMMSIM server to predict its ability to provoke a possible immune response [45]. As described previously [46], the time steps for the three injections in the in silico administration were set as 1, 84 and 168, respectively, with one time step being equal to 8 h in real life. The remaining criteria were set to the default for the prediction.

2.11. Codon Optimization and In Silico Cloning

To achieve the high-quality expression of design vaccine proteins in the prokaryotic expression system E. coli K12, we submitted the amino acid sequence to the JCAT sever for reverse translation and codon optimization to obtain an improved DNA sequence [47]. Subsequently, the vaccine’s DNA sequence was subjected to computational cloning with the pET28a (+) expression vector using Snapgene software (version 5.1.6).

3. Results

3.1. Prediction and Analysis of BCL Epitopes

BCL epitopes were predicted using the ABCPred tool based on their high binding affinity to BCL receptors. Epitopes with the highest binding and antigenicity scores among all potential epitopes are listed in Table S1. Our results show that the numbers of shortlisted epitopes for HP0197, PepO, and 6PGD proteins were 7, 2, and 10, respectively. The epitope from the 6PGD protein had the highest antigenicity score (1.4914), whereas the epitope from the PepO protein had the lowest antigenicity score (0.8605) (Table S1). Based on the antigenicity score, the top two BCL epitopes from each protein were considered for the next vaccine construction (Table 1).

3.2. Prediction of CTL Epitopes

The CTL epitopes were predicted using the IEDB v2.24 webserver. All predicted CTL epitopes with binding affinity for major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I) were subsequently submitted to a series of servers to obtain the desired peptide-containing epitopes that are non-toxic, non-allergenic, and have antigenicity and immunogenicity scores of higher than 0.85 and 0.3, respectively (Table S2). One CTL epitope from each protein was selected separately for subsequent vaccine construction based on its high antigenicity (Table 1).

3.3. Prediction of HTL Epitopes

The HTL epitopes of three candidate antigen proteins of S. suis, namely, HP0197, PepO, and 6PGD, are predicted and presented in Table S3, which shows a comprehensive list of the HTL epitopes based on binding affinity, non-toxicity, non-allergenicity, antigenicity, and the ability to induce IFNγ, IL4, and IL10. Overall, three HTL epitopes (one HTL epitope from each protein with positive IFNγ scores and the potential to induce IL4 and IL10) were selected for vaccine construction (Table 1).

3.4. Analysis of Epitope Conservation

To verify the ubiquity of the 12 predicted antigenic peptides in S. suis, the peptides were submitted to local BLAST based on a database containing 30 S. suis genomes covering serotypes 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 16, 24, and 31. For each epitope, strains with 100% amino acid sequence matching were collected. The phylogenetic tree was built using the strains’ SNPs, as well as serotype, MLST, and epitope conservation. CTL, HTL, and BCL epitopes were covered in all 30 S. suis strains (Figure 1). Furthermore, at least 2/3 CTL epitopes coexisted in each S. suis strain, and more than 3 CTL epitopes were present in several serotypes of S. suis strains (i.e., serotypes 2, 4, 9, 16, 24, and 31), indicating that the epitope sequence appeared more than once in the genomes of S. suis strains. These results indicated that the selected 12 epitopes could cover highly susceptible serotypes in humans, suggesting the potential of the final multiple-epitope vaccine to protect humans from infections caused by various serotypes of S. suis.

3.5. Estimated Population Coverage

To predict population coverage, the selected epitopes and their respective HLA alleles were submitted to the IEDB server. The results showed that the epitopes were predicted to cover 99.19% of the world population. For countries with a developed pig industry, such as China, Vietnam, and Thailand, the population coverage was as high as 95.63%, 93.3%, and 92.83%, respectively (Figure 2A). Meanwhile, in regions where human cases of S. suis infection were frequently reported, such as Southeast Asia (69.73%), East Asia (20.46%), and Europe (8.53%), the population coverage could reach 95.68%, 98.75%, and 99.83%, respectively (Figure 2B).

3.6. Construction of the Multi-Epitope Vaccine (MVHP6)

To chimerize multiple peptides, the 3 CTL, 3 HTL, and 6 BCL epitopes were separated by AAY, KK, and GPGPG linkers, respectively, as shown in Figure 3A. To optimize vaccine solubility, the epitopes in each category were rearranged so that the hydrophilic epitopes were at the ends of the chimeric proteins. Moreover, the EAAAK linker was employed to join the first epitope of CTL and the adjuvant sequence, 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 (130 amino acids) (Figure 3A). The final MVHP6 construct is composed of 345 amino acid residues. Importantly, MVHP6 exhibited non-toxicity and non-allergenicity, as well as a possible antigen with a high antigenicity score (0.87).

3.7. Tertiary Structure Prediction, Refinement, and Validation of MVHP6

Upon providing the vaccine sequence, the I-TASSER server generated five predicted 3D structures of MVHP6, and the model 3, with the highest C-score of −3.54, was selected for further study. To further improve the 3D structures of the vaccine, the GalaxyWEB server was used to obtain the final 3D structure of MVHP6 (Figure 3B). The epitopes shown in different colors were found on the surface of the constructed vaccine (Figure 3C). The improved model was evaluated and showed an increase in the Z score from −6.36 to −7.01 according to ProSA-web (Figure S1). Moreover, Ramachandran analysis verified 82.7%, 14.4%, and 1.4% of residues in the red region (most favorable), yellow region (additional allowances), and pale yellow area (generous allowances), respectively. Approximately 1.4% of the vaccine’s residues were found in forbidden locations (highlighted in white) (Figure 3D). The vaccine 3D structure has an overall quality score of 79.1139, evaluated by the ERRAT server, indicating that the overall model quality is satisfactory (Figure S2).

3.8. Molecular Docking of the Constructed Vaccine with the Human Toll-like Receptor, TLR4

Vaccines should have a high affinity for host immune receptors such as the Toll-like receptors and MHC molecules to induce an optimal immune response. Herein, molecular docking analysis using ClusPro 2.0 revealed that MVHP6 had a strong binding affinity to TLR4 (Figure 4A). The vaccine-TLR4 complexes showing H-bond interactions were LYS3-SER613, THR6-CYS583, ASP7-SER613, GLU8-LYS560, CLU15-LYS561, CLU15-SER589, CLU15-CLN588, CLU20-THR626, and LYS27-ASP614. In addition to hydrogen bonding, the PDBsum server was used to comprehensively understand the binding residues between the docked complexes. The results showed 3 salt bridges, 142 non-bonded contacts, and an absence of disulfide bonds between the interacting atoms of the MVHP6-TLR4 docked complex (Figure 4B,C). Furthermore, MVHP6 showed considerable interactions with TLR2, MHC-I, and MHC-II (Figures S3–S5).

3.9. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation

The MD simulation of the MVHP6-TLR4 docking complex was performed using the iMODS server. The deformability builds up the independent distortion of each residue, portrayed by the method of chain hinges (Figure 5A). Figure 5B shows the deformability plot of both complexes, where the peaks indicate the non-rigid regions of the complexes. The Eigenvalue of the MVHP6-TLR4 docking complexes was 2.216878 × 10−6 (Figure 5C). Additionally, the variance matrix graph of the residues is inversely related to the eigenvalue, showing the individual (red) and cumulative (green) variances (Figure 5D). The covariance matrix signifies the coupling between pairs of residues, representing the correlation experience: red represents correlated, white represents uncorrelated, and blue shows anti-correlated motions (Figure 5E). Figure 5F shows the elastic network of the complexes, where dots indicate one spring and a gray area indicates stiffer springs. These results suggest stable binding interactions with compact conformation and minor fluctuations in the vaccine—TLR4 complex.

3.10. Immunogenicity Evaluation of the Vaccine

The simulated immune response revealed that antibody levels increased progressively with the number of immunizations (Figure 6A). Figure 6B,C shows that the vaccine was designed to accumulate increased B-cell and T-cell populations. A considerable increase in Th1 concentration was observed after each dose. Additionally, a significant increase in macrophage numbers was observed following the injection (Figure 6D,E). Observably, various cytokines exhibited a robust increase in levels after injection (Figure 6F). Overall, these results suggested that MVHP6 could be effective in eliciting a robust immune response in silico.

3.11. In Silico Cloning of the Vaccine Candidate

The JCAT tool analysis revealed that the optimized sequence of MVHP6 had a codon adaptation index value of 1 and a GC content of 48.89%, indicating a high probability of the prokaryotic expression of the vaccine construct. We selected the BamHI and ScaI restriction sites and then successfully inserted the optimized sequence into the pET28a (+) vector, resulting in a 6404 bp cloned vector (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

S. suis can cause serious food safety problems and is harmful to public health, especially in countries with developed pig industries. With the continuous increase in S. suis resistance, a universal vaccine that can protect humans against various serotypes of S. suis is urgently needed. Currently, vaccine research on Streptococcus pneumoniae has focused on the development of polysaccharide conjugate-based vaccines for humans, which provides opportunities for multivalent vaccines against S. suis infections. However, there are still limitations to the development of multivalent polysaccharide conjugate-based vaccines, despite the success of the S. suis serotype 2 (SS2) vaccine construction. In order to address the challenges posed by diverse serotypes and geographic prevalence, we developed a multi-epitope vaccine by combining epitopes from three highly conserved antigenic proteins (6PGD, HP0197, and PepO) using in-silico-based predictions. We also evaluated its potential as a universal vaccine to trigger serotype-independent immunity at a low cost.
To ensure the cross-protection of a multi-epitope vaccine, it is important to select antigenic proteins that are conserved across all S. suis strains, regardless of serotype. BLASTP analysis showed that 6PGD, HP0197, and PepO were conserved in whole sequenced S. suis strains published in the NCBI, which is very promising for predicting epitopes with high conservation across multiple serotypes. Moreover, it is equally important to select candidate proteins that have been experimentally proven to provoke an immune response in the host, which could increase the likelihood of the epitope being successfully recognized by the host.
HP0197 is important in CPS synthesis, bacterial adhesion via HP0197-GAG-binding interaction, and virulence [49,50]. Importantly, HP0197 is a surface protective antigen that offers significant protection against lethal doses of SS2 in mice and pigs [22]. Moreover, HP0197 induces high titers of IgG antibodies, which provides complete protection in a passive immunized mouse model [22]. Previously, specific antibodies to HP0197 were detected in all convalescent sera of pigs and in sera from patients, indicating that HP0197 is an excellent candidate antigen against SS2 infection [51].
PepO, an important virulence factor, can cleave C3b via activated plasmin, enabling S. suis to evade innate immunity [52] and facilitate S. suis adherence to HBMEC cells by binding to fibronectin, thereby helping S. suis to cross the blood–brain barrier and cause meningitis [53]. Recently, it was shown that PepO elicited a strong immune response and provided complete protection in mice and partial protection in piglets when challenged with lethal doses of SS2 [23]. Furthermore, anti-rPepO serum provided good passive protection against SS2 infection in a mouse model [23]. Similarly, the PepO + PsaA combination vaccine significantly reduced S. pneumoniae colonization in the nasopharynx and lungs. Interestingly, S. pneumoniae PepO induced autophagy in a TLR2/TLR4-dependent manner, promoting macrophage phagocytosis and bactericidal activity. For example, S. pneumoniae PepO protected C57/BL6 mice from lung infections and reduced S. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa loads [54]. Notably, PepO has been proposed as a TLR agonist adjuvant candidate to enhance vaccine immunogenicity [55].
6PGD, a rate-limiting enzyme of the pentose phosphate cycle, is normally found in the cytoplasm. Importantly, 6PGD is identified as a surface protein involved in the adhesion and colonization of bacteria such as S. pneumoniae [56], S. suis [57], and Haemophilus parvum [58]. Recently, it was shown that S. suis r6PGD triggers high titers of specific antibodies, protecting 50% of piglets [24] and 80% of mice [57]. Additionally, mice immunized with live attenuated Salmonella cholerae vaccines carrying 6PGD from SS2 achieved a more than 90% survival rate when challenged with 10 or 20 × LD50 SS2 [59].
Epitopes predicted from candidate antigens were selected from T and B cell epitopes based on immunogenicity and antigenicity. A conservativeness analysis revealed that the selected epitopes could cover the reported serotypes that infect humans, owing to the candidate proteins being broadly distributed in the genome with high conservation. Vaccine constructs were designed by combining CTL, HTL, and BCL epitopes using suitable linkers that are important in increasing expression, stabilization, and folding. Additionally, vaccines based on multiple epitopes require adjuvant coupling as they lack immunogenicity when used alone. Indeed, several bacterial proteins, such as SLY, c-di-GMP, and PLY [60,61,62], trigger significant immune responses. Specific fragments from bacterial proteins are also frequently added as protein adjuvants to the amino acid sequence of subunit vaccines, such as β-defensin, ribosomal proteins, ESAT6, and HBHA [63,64]. Herein, the 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 was selected and linked to CTL via a linker, an excellent adjuvant from Mycobacterium tuberculosis responsible for activating the polarization of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and inducing T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity [65]. Based on the above, our vaccine construct, MVHP6, strongly interacted with TLR4 and proficiently bound with MHC I and MHC II, implying that the epitopes from the vaccine could be delivered efficiently to the host. Moreover, an MD simulation analysis of molecular docking showed that MVHP6-TLR4 requires a minimum energy for stable binding. Naturally, immune response simulations revealed that the final MVHP6 construct could induce the anticipated strong primary, secondary, and tertiary immune responses in vivo, providing an assurance of vaccination effectiveness prior to animal testing. These findings suggested that multi-epitope vaccine development is reasonable and appropriate, paving the way for controlling S. suis infections in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study introduces a universal multi-epitope vaccine candidate that could provide protection to humans against various serotypes of S. suis infections. Evaluation with the most reliable tools showed that the novel vaccine has desirable immunodominant properties and high population coverage. Therefore, we believe that multi-epitope vaccines could be an appropriate strategy for the development of serotype-independent vaccines.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci10060383/s1, Table S1: The identification and evaluation of BCL epitopes; Table S2: The identification and evaluation of CTL epitopes; Table S3: The identification and evaluation of HTL epitopes; Figure S1: ProSA-web evaluation of the vaccine structure; Figure S2: ERRAT error prediction; Figure S3: Residues of the interaction between docked MVHP6 and TLR2; Figure S4: Residues of the interaction between docked MVHP6 and MHC I; Figure S5: Residues of the interaction between docked MVHP6 and MHC II.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, Y.Z., Z.W. and J.S.; Software, Y.Z., G.Z., F.L. and Y.C. (Yifan Chen); validation and formal analysis, Y.Z., G.Z., Y.C. (Yuqiang Cheng), Y.X., J.M., H.W. and Y.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and G.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.W. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFE0101300), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (21N41900100, 23N51900300), and Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No. 2022-02-08-00-12-F01182).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on request due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haas, B.; Grenier, D. Understanding the Virulence of Streptococcus Suis: A Veterinary, Medical, and Economic Challenge. Med. Malpract. Infect. 2018, 48, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Segura, M.; Aragon, V.; Brockmeier, S.L.; Gebhart, C.; de Greeff, A.; Kerdsin, A.; O’Dea, M.A.; Okura, M.; Saléry, M.; Schultsz, C.; et al. Update on Streptococcus Suis Research and Prevention in the Era of Antimicrobial Restriction: 4th International Workshop on S. Suis. Pathogens 2020, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gottschalk, M.; Xu, J.; Calzas, C.; Segura, M. Streptococcus Suis: A New Emerging or an Old Neglected Zoonotic Pathogen? Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 371–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dutkiewicz, J.; Sroka, J.; Zając, V.; Wasiński, B.; Cisak, E.; Sawczyn, A.; Kloc, A.; Wójcik-Fatla, A. Streptococcus Suis: A Re-Emerging Pathogen Associated with Occupational Exposure to Pigs or Pork Products. Part I—Epidemiology. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2017, 24, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yu, H.; Jing, H.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, H.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, L.; Zu, R.; Luo, L.; et al. Human Streptococcus Suis Outbreak, Sichuan, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, X.; Zhu, F.; Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Wang, G.; Sun, J.; Hua, C.; Yang, H. Studies on human streptococcal infectious syndrome caused by infected pigs. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000, 34, 150–152. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kerdsin, A.; Segura, M.; Fittipaldi, N.; Gottschalk, M. Sociocultural Factors Influencing Human Streptococcus Suis Disease in Southeast Asia. Foods 2022, 11, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Y.; Fang, J.-T.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, Q.; Walsh, T.R.; Liao, X.-P.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.-H. Combination Therapy Strategies Against Multiple-Resistant Streptococcus Suis. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Petrocchi-Rilo, M.; Martínez-Martínez, S.; Aguarón-Turrientes, Á.; Roca-Martínez, E.; García-Iglesias, M.-J.; Pérez-Fernández, E.; González-Fernández, A.; Herencia-Lagunar, E.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.-B. Anatomical Site, Typing, Virulence Gene Profiling, Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Resistance Genes of Streptococcus Suis Isolates Recovered from Pigs in Spain. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rieckmann, K.; Pendzialek, S.-M.; Vahlenkamp, T.; Baums, C.G. A Critical Review Speculating on the Protective Efficacies of Autogenous Streptococcus Suis Bacterins as Used in Europe. Porc. Health Manag. 2020, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Segura, M. Streptococcus Suis Vaccines: Candidate Antigens and Progress. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 1587–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, Z.; Yao, X.; Pan, R.; Zhang, J.; Ma, X.; Dong, N.; Wei, J.; Liu, K.; Qiu, Y.; Sealey, K.; et al. Subunit Vaccine Targeting Phosphate ABC Transporter ATP-Binding Protein, PstB, Provides Cross-Protection against Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2, 7, and 9 in Mice. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yi, L.; Du, Y.; Mao, C.; Li, J.; Jin, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y. Immunogenicity and Protective Ability of RpoE against Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yi, L.; Fan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Mao, C.; Li, J.; Jin, M.; Zhang, X.; Ding, K.; Wang, Y. Evaluation of Immune Effect of Streptococcus Suis Biofilm-Associated Protein PDH. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 263, 109270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.; Qin, Z.; Li, M. Recent Advances in Pathogenic Streptococcus Vaccine Development. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 32, 645–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weiße, C.; Dittmar, D.; Jakóbczak, B.; Florian, V.; Schütze, N.; Alber, G.; Klose, K.; Michalik, S.; Valentin-Weigand, P.; Völker, U.; et al. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of a Streptococcus Suis Vaccine Composed of Six Conserved Immunogens. Vet. Res. 2021, 52, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Salmonella Enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vector Delivering a Dual-Antigen Expression Cassette Provides Mouse Cross-Protection against Streptococcus Suis Serotypes 2, 7, 9, and 1/2. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Samad, A.; Ahammad, F.; Nain, Z.; Alam, R.; Imon, R.R.; Hasan, M.; Rahman, M.S. Designing a Multi-Epitope Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: An Immunoinformatics Approach. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 40, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Majidiani, H.; Dalimi, A.; Ghaffarifar, F.; Pirestani, M. Multi-Epitope Vaccine Expressed in Leishmania Tarentolae Confers Protective Immunity to Toxoplasma Gondii in BALB/c Mice. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bibi, S.; Ullah, I.; Zhu, B.; Adnan, M.; Liaqat, R.; Kong, W.-B.; Niu, S. In Silico Analysis of Epitope-Based Vaccine Candidate against Tuberculosis Using Reverse Vaccinology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tahir ul Qamar, M.; Ahmad, S.; Fatima, I.; Ahmad, F.; Shahid, F.; Naz, A.; Abbasi, S.W.; Khan, A.; Mirza, M.U.; Ashfaq, U.A.; et al. Designing Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Staphylococcus Aureus by Employing Subtractive Proteomics, Reverse Vaccinology and Immuno-Informatics Approaches. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 132, 104389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, A.; Chen, B.; Li, R.; Mu, X.; Han, L.; Zhou, H.; Chen, H.; Meilin, J. Identification of a Surface Protective Antigen, HP0197 of Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5209–5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Xia, J.; Tan, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, C.; Chen, H.; Bei, W. Evaluation of the Immunogenicity and the Protective Efficacy of a Novel Identified Immunogenic Protein, SsPepO, of Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2. Vaccine 2011, 29, 6514–6519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tan, C.; Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Yuan, F.; Fu, S.; Liu, Y.; Jin, M.; Bei, W.; Chen, H. Vaccination with Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2 Recombinant 6PGD Protein Provides Protection against S. Suis Infection in Swine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 296, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doytchinova, I.A.; Flower, D.R. VaxiJen: A Server for Prediction of Protective Antigens, Tumour Antigens and Subunit Vaccines. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saha, S.; Raghava, G.P.S. Prediction of Continuous B-Cell Epitopes in an Antigen Using Recurrent Neural Network. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2006, 65, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dimitrov, I.; Bangov, I.; Flower, D.R.; Doytchinova, I. AllerTOP v.2—A Server for in Silico Prediction of Allergens. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, N.; Naorem, L.D.; Jain, S.; Raghava, G.P.S. ToxinPred2: An Improved Method for Predicting Toxicity of Proteins. Brief. Bioinform. 2022, 23, bbac174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Andreatta, M.; Nielsen, M. Gapped Sequence Alignment Using Artificial Neural Networks: Application to the MHC Class I System. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Calis, J.J.A.; Maybeno, M.; Greenbaum, J.A.; Weiskopf, D.; De Silva, A.D.; Sette, A.; Keşmir, C.; Peters, B. Properties of MHC Class I Presented Peptides That Enhance Immunogenicity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, P.; Sidney, J.; Kim, Y.; Sette, A.; Lund, O.; Nielsen, M.; Peters, B. Peptide Binding Predictions for HLA DR, DP and DQ Molecules. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dhanda, S.K.; Vir, P.; Raghava, G.P. Designing of Interferon-Gamma Inducing MHC Class-II Binders. Biol. Direct 2013, 8, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dhanda, S.K.; Gupta, S.; Vir, P.; Raghava, G.P.S. Prediction of IL4 Inducing Peptides. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 263952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nagpal, G.; Usmani, S.S.; Dhanda, S.K.; Kaur, H.; Singh, S.; Sharma, M.; Raghava, G.P.S. Computer-Aided Designing of Immunosuppressive Peptides Based on IL-10 Inducing Potential. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.-C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools in the ExPASy Server. In 2-D Proteome Analysis Protocols; Link, A.J., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1999; pp. 531–552. ISBN 978-1-59259-584-6. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, Y. I-TASSER Server for Protein 3D Structure Prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Heo, L.; Park, H.; Seok, C. GalaxyRefine: Protein Structure Refinement Driven by Side-Chain Repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W384–W388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Laskowski, R.A.; Rullmann, J.A.C.; MacArthur, M.W.; Kaptein, R.; Thornton, J.M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: Programs for Checking the Quality of Protein Structures Solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 1996, 8, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wiederstein, M.; Sippl, M.J. ProSA-Web: Interactive Web Service for the Recognition of Errors in Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W407–W410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Colovos, C.; Yeates, T.O. Verification of Protein Structures: Patterns of Nonbonded Atomic Interactions. Protein Sci. 1993, 2, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bui, H.-H.; Sidney, J.; Dinh, K.; Southwood, S.; Newman, M.J.; Sette, A. Predicting Population Coverage of T-Cell Epitope-Based Diagnostics and Vaccines. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kozakov, D.; Hall, D.R.; Xia, B.; Porter, K.A.; Padhorny, D.; Yueh, C.; Beglov, D.; Vajda, S. The ClusPro Web Server for Protein-Protein Docking. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Laskowski, R.A.; Jabłońska, J.; Pravda, L.; Vařeková, R.S.; Thornton, J.M. PDBsum: Structural Summaries of PDB Entries. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. López-Blanco, J.R.; Aliaga, J.I.; Quintana-Ortí, E.S.; Chacón, P. IMODS: Internal Coordinates Normal Mode Analysis Server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W271–W276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rapin, N.; Lund, O.; Bernaschi, M.; Castiglione, F. Computational Immunology Meets Bioinformatics: The Use of Prediction Tools for Molecular Binding in the Simulation of the Immune System. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dey, J.; Mahapatra, S.R.; Patnaik, S.; Lata, S.; Kushwaha, G.S.; Panda, R.K.; Misra, N.; Suar, M. Molecular Characterization and Designing of a Novel Multiepitope Vaccine Construct Against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Int. J. Pept. Res. 2022, 28, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Grote, A.; Hiller, K.; Scheer, M.; Münch, R.; Nörtemann, B.; Hempel, D.C.; Jahn, D. JCat: A Novel Tool to Adapt Codon Usage of a Target Gene to Its Potential Expression Host. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W526–W531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Goyette-Desjardins, G.; Auger, J.-P.; Xu, J.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus Suis, an Important Pig Pathogen and Emerging Zoonotic Agent—An Update on the Worldwide Distribution Based on Serotyping and Sequence Typing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yuan, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhang, A.; Chen, B.; Shen, Y.; Jin, M. Molecular Mechanism by Which Surface Antigen HP0197 Mediates Host Cell Attachment in the Pathogenic Bacteria Streptococcus Suis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, A.; Chen, B.; Yuan, Z.; Li, R.; Liu, C.; Zhou, H.; Chen, H.; Jin, M. HP0197 Contributes to CPS Synthesis and the Virulence of Streptococcus Suis via CcpA. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Geng, H.; Zhu, L.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, K.; Cao, W.; Wang, H.; et al. Identification and Characterization of Novel Immunogenic Proteins of Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 4132–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, Y.; Yan, K.; Sun, C.; Liu, F.; Peng, W.; Chen, H.; Yuan, F.; Bei, W.; Li, J. Binding of Plasminogen to Streptococcus Suis Protein Endopeptidase O Facilitates Evasion of Innate Immunity in Streptococcus Suis. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 694103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, F.; Li, J.; Yan, K.; Li, H.; Sun, C.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, F.; Wang, X.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; et al. Binding of Fibronectin to SsPepO Facilitates the Development of Streptococcus Suis Meningitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 217, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shu, Z.; Yuan, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, X. Streptococcus Pneumoniae PepO Promotes Host Anti-Infection Defense via Autophagy in a Toll-like Receptor 2/4 Dependent Manner. Virulence 2020, 11, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bahadori, Z.; Shafaghi, M.; Madanchi, H.; Ranjbar, M.M.; Shabani, A.A.; Mousavi, S.F. In Silico Designing of a Novel Epitope-Based Candidate Vaccine against Streptococcus Pneumoniae with Introduction of a New Domain of PepO as Adjuvant. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Daniely, D.; Portnoi, M.; Shagan, M.; Porgador, A.; Givon-Lavi, N.; Ling, E.; Dagan, R.; Nebenzahl, Y.M. Pneumococcal 6-Phosphogluconate-Dehydrogenase, a Putative Adhesin, Induces Protective Immune Response in Mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 144, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tan, C.; Fu, S.; Liu, M.; Jin, M.; Liu, J.; Bei, W.; Chen, H. Cloning, Expression and Characterization of a Cell Wall Surface Protein, 6-Phosphogluconate-Dehydrogenase, of Streptococcus Suis Serotype 2. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 130, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fu, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, M.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; Bei, W. Cloning, Expression and Characterization of a Cell Wall Surface Protein, 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase, of Haemophilus Parasuis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ji, Z.; Shang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Live Attenuated Salmonella Enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vaccine Vector Displaying Regulated Delayed Attenuation and Regulated Delayed Antigen Synthesis to Confer Protection against Streptococcus Suis in Mice. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4858–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, M.-C.; Wu, H.-C.; Lee, J.-W.; Chang, W.-C.; Chu, C.-Y. A Protein-Based Subunit Vaccine with Biological Adjuvants Provides Effective Protection against Pasteurella Multocida in Pigs. Vet. Res. 2023, 54, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ogunniyi, A.D.; Paton, J.C.; Kirby, A.C.; McCullers, J.A.; Cook, J.; Hyodo, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Karaolis, D.K.R. C-Di-GMP Is an Effective Immunomodulator and Vaccine Adjuvant Against Pneumococcal Infection. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4676–4685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kumar, S.; Sunagar, R.; Gosselin, E. Bacterial Protein Toll-Like-Receptor Agonists: A Novel Perspective on Vaccine Adjuvants. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aziz, S.; Almajhdi, F.N.; Waqas, M.; Ullah, I.; Salim, M.A.; Khan, N.A.; Ali, A. Contriving Multi-Epitope Vaccine Ensemble for Monkeypox Disease Using an Immunoinformatics Approach. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1004804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jang, A.-R.; Choi, J.-H.; Shin, S.J.; Park, J.-H. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ESAT6 Induces IFN-β Gene Expression in Macrophages via TLRs-Mediated Signaling. Cytokine 2018, 104, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, S.J.; Shin, S.J.; Lee, M.H.; Lee, M.-G.; Kang, T.H.; Park, W.S.; Soh, B.Y.; Park, J.H.; Shin, Y.K.; Kim, H.W.; et al. A Potential Protein Adjuvant Derived from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Rv0652 Enhances Dendritic Cells-Based Tumor Immunotherapy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vetsci 10 00383 g001 550
Figure 1. Conservative analysis of predicted epitopes against strains of S. suis infecting humans. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on SNPs from the genomes of 30 human-infecting S. suis strains. The different base colors of the strain names show the different serotypes. The colored circles represent the MLST types of the different strains. The outer layer (from the inner to the outer part), shows the conservation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, helper T lymphocyte, and B-cell epitopes, respectively. Within each category, the distribution of exact matches varies from 1 to 6 across strains.
Figure 1. Conservative analysis of predicted epitopes against strains of S. suis infecting humans. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on SNPs from the genomes of 30 human-infecting S. suis strains. The different base colors of the strain names show the different serotypes. The colored circles represent the MLST types of the different strains. The outer layer (from the inner to the outer part), shows the conservation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, helper T lymphocyte, and B-cell epitopes, respectively. Within each category, the distribution of exact matches varies from 1 to 6 across strains.
Vetsci 10 00383 g001
Vetsci 10 00383 g002 550
Figure 2. Population coverage analysis. (A) World map indicating population coverage in different regions, predicted based on the selected epitopes; countries shown in gray indicate unavailability of data. (B) Population coverage and condition of reported cases in different regions. Reported cases are derived from the reference [48].
Figure 2. Population coverage analysis. (A) World map indicating population coverage in different regions, predicted based on the selected epitopes; countries shown in gray indicate unavailability of data. (B) Population coverage and condition of reported cases in different regions. Reported cases are derived from the reference [48].
Vetsci 10 00383 g002
Vetsci 10 00383 g003 550
Figure 3. Analysis of the finalized multi-epitope vaccine (MVHP6) construct. (A) Schematic representation of the sequence and epitope alignment concerning the MVHP6 construct. (B) Predicted and refined 3D structure of MVHP6. (C) Presentation of epitopes in the 3D structure of MVHP6. Different epitopes are indicated using different colors; white areas represent adjuvants and linkers. The labeled proteins have CTL epitopes in orange, HTL epitopes in pink, and BCL epitopes in purple. (D) Ramachandran diagram of the refined MVHP6 construct. Red region: most favorable [A, B, L]; yellow region: additional allowances [a,b,l,p]; pale yellow area: generous allowances [~a,~b,~l,~p].
Figure 3. Analysis of the finalized multi-epitope vaccine (MVHP6) construct. (A) Schematic representation of the sequence and epitope alignment concerning the MVHP6 construct. (B) Predicted and refined 3D structure of MVHP6. (C) Presentation of epitopes in the 3D structure of MVHP6. Different epitopes are indicated using different colors; white areas represent adjuvants and linkers. The labeled proteins have CTL epitopes in orange, HTL epitopes in pink, and BCL epitopes in purple. (D) Ramachandran diagram of the refined MVHP6 construct. Red region: most favorable [A, B, L]; yellow region: additional allowances [a,b,l,p]; pale yellow area: generous allowances [~a,~b,~l,~p].
Vetsci 10 00383 g003
Vetsci 10 00383 g004 550
Figure 4. Molecular docking of the vaccine with TLR4. (A) Diagram of the docking pattern of the multi-epitope vaccine (MVHP6)-TLR4 complex. (B) Diagram of the docking conformation and hydrogen bonding interactions of MVHP6 (shown in purple) with TLR4 chain A (shown in pink) and chain B (shown in bright blue); the black dashed lines refer to the hydrogen bonds. (C) Residues of the interaction between docked MVHP6 and TLR4.
Figure 4. Molecular docking of the vaccine with TLR4. (A) Diagram of the docking pattern of the multi-epitope vaccine (MVHP6)-TLR4 complex. (B) Diagram of the docking conformation and hydrogen bonding interactions of MVHP6 (shown in purple) with TLR4 chain A (shown in pink) and chain B (shown in bright blue); the black dashed lines refer to the hydrogen bonds. (C) Residues of the interaction between docked MVHP6 and TLR4.
Vetsci 10 00383 g004
Vetsci 10 00383 g005 550
Figure 5. Molecular dynamics simulation of the MVHP6-TLR4 complex. (A) Deformability map of the docking complex. (B) NMA calculation of the B factor. (C) Eigenvalues of the docked complex. (D) NMA variance. (E) Covariance matrix plot of the atomic pairs of amino acid residues of the docked complex. (F) Connection spring plot of the elastic network model of the docked complex.
Figure 5. Molecular dynamics simulation of the MVHP6-TLR4 complex. (A) Deformability map of the docking complex. (B) NMA calculation of the B factor. (C) Eigenvalues of the docked complex. (D) NMA variance. (E) Covariance matrix plot of the atomic pairs of amino acid residues of the docked complex. (F) Connection spring plot of the elastic network model of the docked complex.
Vetsci 10 00383 g005
Vetsci 10 00383 g006 550
Figure 6. The immune response of humans after vaccination using the multi-epitope vaccine. (A) Increases in antibodies after vaccination. (B) Increased numbers of B cells and levels of memory immunoglobulins following vaccination. Increased numbers of T lymphocytes (C) and helper T lymphocytes (D) after vaccination, which remained at high levels throughout the exposure time. (E) Behavior of the population of natural killer cells. (F) Induction of cytokines and interleukins.
Figure 6. The immune response of humans after vaccination using the multi-epitope vaccine. (A) Increases in antibodies after vaccination. (B) Increased numbers of B cells and levels of memory immunoglobulins following vaccination. Increased numbers of T lymphocytes (C) and helper T lymphocytes (D) after vaccination, which remained at high levels throughout the exposure time. (E) Behavior of the population of natural killer cells. (F) Induction of cytokines and interleukins.
Vetsci 10 00383 g006
Vetsci 10 00383 g007 550
Figure 7. The in silico cloning of the optimized vaccine (shown in red) into the pET28a (+) expression vector.
Figure 7. The in silico cloning of the optimized vaccine (shown in red) into the pET28a (+) expression vector.
Vetsci 10 00383 g007
Table
Table 1. The selected epitopes for the multi-epitope vaccine.
Table 1. The selected epitopes for the multi-epitope vaccine.
EpitopeProteinSequenceAntigenicityHydropathicity
BCLHP0197MKKEEVKTTPSVQSNP1.1755−1.35
EEEYNAHLKQDEGKSI1.0451−1.744
PepOKENYDGTDEFSLKNQK1.288−2.05
SKLEVAPGYYVNGEIS0.8605−0.156
6PGDLKRKDDQGQDGPIVNY1.4914−1.531
IGTGVSGGEKGALEGP1.3547−0.131
CTLHP0197DGKVVATNL1.46920.222
PepOALVPNLPIA1.55351.467
6PGDKAGKKVSVY1.3846−0.444
HTLHP0197NDFKYQIKVENYIRQ0.8205−1.327
PepOEVKALVPNLPIAELV0.62470.967
6PGDDSYLIEITADILKRK0.5099−0.18
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Xiong, Y.; Li, F.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Development of a Universal Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Streptococcus suis Infections Using Immunoinformatics Approaches. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060383

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhao G, Xiong Y, Li F, Chen Y, Cheng Y, Ma J, Wang H, Yan Y, Wang Z, et al. Development of a Universal Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Streptococcus suis Infections Using Immunoinformatics Approaches. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(6):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yumin, Guoqing Zhao, Yangjing Xiong, Feiyu Li, Yifan Chen, Yuqiang Cheng, Jingjiao Ma, Henan Wang, Yaxian Yan, Zhaofei Wang, and et al. 2023. "Development of a Universal Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Streptococcus suis Infections Using Immunoinformatics Approaches" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 6: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop