Next Article in Journal
Review of Research into the Determination of Acrylamide in Foods
Previous Article in Journal
Various Statistical Approaches to Assess and Predict Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis

Charis M. Galanakis
Research & Innovation Department, Galanakis Laboratories, 73131 Chania, Greece
College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Food Waste Recovery Group, ISEKI Food Association, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Foods 2020, 9(4), 523;
Submission received: 1 April 2020 / Revised: 14 April 2020 / Accepted: 15 April 2020 / Published: 22 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Food Security and Sustainability)


The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19, broadly referred to as “coronavirus”) a global pandemic, while thousands of infections and deaths are reported daily. The current article explores the food systems in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. It provides insights about the properties of bioactive ingredients of foods and herbs for the support of the human immune system against infections before discussing the possibility of COVID-19 transmission through the food chain. It also highlights the global food security issues arising from the fact that one-third of the world’s population is on lockdown. Finally, it underlines the importance of sustainability in the food chain in order to avoid or reduce the frequency of relevant food and health crises in the future.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2) is an easily transmissible disease that was identified within December 2019 and declared a pandemic by WHO on 11 March 2020 [1]. The first infections were linked (with some, but not firm evidence) to the Huanan Seafood Market (Wuhan, China) [2]. Zhou et al. [3] used sequencing technology to show that SARS-CoV-2 and bat coronavirus possess a similarity of gene sequence up to 96.2%, suggesting bats as the possible source of SARS-CoV2. As of 16 April 2020, over 2 million cases of COVID-19 and over 137,000 corresponding deaths have been reported in over 210 countries, where these numbers are growing exponentially daily [4,5]. The flu-like symptoms of COVID-19 usually appear 5–6 days after infection and include coughing, sore throat, fever, muscle and body aches [6], and even loss of smell or taste in some cases [7].
Since no cure or vaccine has been developed for COVID-19 disease yet, the scientific community and authorities are seeking knowledge and information for the short- and long-term management of the current and future pandemic crises, respectively. The food sector and its stakeholders are also in the spotlight, as food is necessary for human survival and cannot be lockdown. A severe pandemic causing more than a 25% reduction in labor availability could generate significant food shortages across the globe [8]. Authorities and research communities should quickly identify the most critical threats to the food system during a pandemic in order to implement mitigation measures.
This article explores the food systems in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (Figure 1). There are four significant issues that the food industry and the food supply chain should address in the new era. Firstly, as consumers are looking to protect themselves and their immune system by adopting healthier diets, the availability of bioactive ingredients of food and functional foods may become critical, as the demand for these products may increase. Secondly, food safety is a significant issue in order to avoid the spreading of the virus between producers, retailers, and consumers. Thirdly, food security issues have emerged due to the lockdown of a billion people inside their houses. Last but not least, the sustainability of the food systems in the era of pandemics is another issue that the sector should address in order to restrict relevant crises in the future.

2. The Role of Bioactive Ingredients in Supporting the Human Immune System

The COVID-19 pandemic has similar characteristics to the well-known outbreaks of the last 20 years, such as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV, from 2002 to 2004) and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS, from 2012 until now) outbreaks. These two outbreaks were diseases of the lower respiratory tract with a similar clinical presentation at their early stages of infection (e.g., cough and fever), leading to significant mortality among vulnerable individuals (e.g., those who do not have a robust immune system and those who smoke) and older people [9].
The consumption of foods rich in vitamins and of functional foods can boost the immune system to help fight off viruses [10,11]. For instance, ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) is known to play a protective role, as it supports the immune function and is necessary for the development and repair of all body tissues [12]. Also, under certain conditions, it restricts the susceptibility of the lower respiratory tract to infection [13]. Foods rich in Vitamin C include citrus fruits, kiwifruits, and broccoli. Other vegetables, like carrots, spinach, and sweet potato, are rich in Vitamin A. This vitamin comprises a group of fat-soluble compounds (including retinol, retinoic acid, and β-carotene) that play an essential role in the immune function and are known to lower the susceptibility to infections [14]. For instance, isotretinoin (a derivative of vitamin A) mediates the down-regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is a crucial host cellular protein required for the entry of SARS-COV-2 in the body [15]. Besides, supplementation with Vitamins D and E may boost our resistance to COVID-19 [16], as the decrease in cattle’s levels of Vitamins D and E could lead to infection by a bovine coronavirus [17]. Das [9] suggested that the oral or intravenous administration of bioactive lipids (such as arachidonic acid and other unsaturated fatty acids) may aid in enhancing resistance and recovery from SARS-CoV-2, SARS, and MERS infections. Natural polyphenols such as hesperidin and rutin have been shown to be effective inhibitors of COVID-19 main protease (Mpro), which is considered a potential therapeutic drug target [18].
Herbal and Chinese medicines have also been shown to help in the treatment of viral diseases. For instance, ginseng root is useful in the prevention of viral respiratory diseases such as those due to strains of influenza [19,20]. Astragulus membranaceus is used to treat common cold and upper respiratory infections [21], whereas Pelargonium sidoides is an effective herbal remedy for the inhibition of respiratory viruses’ replication [20]. Historical evidence regarding the prevention of H1N1 and SARS influenza in the high-risk population indicates that Chinese herbal formulas could provide an alternative approach for the prevention of COVID-19 [21].
Other food bioactives found in traditional Chinese medicine (e.g., plant-derived phenolic compounds, flavonoids from litchi seeds, quercetin, and kaempferol) have been reported to inhibit the enzymatic activity of SARS 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro). This enzyme is vital for the replication of SARS-CoV and thus could be suggested as a potential treatment agent against SARS-CoV-2 and supportive care agent for patients with COVID-19 [22]. The guidelines and the herbal formulas used for the supportive care of patients with COVID-19 were revised by Ang et al. [23]. However, the potential preventive effect of these formulas should be confirmed with rigorous and prospective clinical studies [21].
Dietary supplementation with the above vitamins, bioactive lipids, flavonoids, and herbs may be a tool to support the human immune system against COVID19. However, as of 16 April 2020, there is still no substantial evidence that these bioactive ingredients can boost enough our immune system to prevent or cure COVID-19. Nevertheless, their ability to boost the human immune system highlights their prospect use in functional foods and presence in nutraceuticals market. Nowadays, supporting the immune system is among consumers’ top health goals globally. In fact, almost one in five consumers listed immune system support as the number one reason for purchasing healthy products in a recent consumer survey (Nutraceuticalsworld, 2019; [24]). In the new era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is foreseen that consumers will increasingly seek products to boost their immune system in the future.

3. Food Safety within the Pandemic Crisis

SARS-CoV, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2 may be traced to zoonotic transmission [9]. Coronaviruses circulate among animals, while some of them are also known to infect humans [25]. Although bats (as natural hosts) were a likely source of the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, researchers and scientists are still seeking information and evidence of how COVID-19 is transmitted. Several other animals may also be relevant hosts, e.g., it is known that SARS-CoV-1 is transmitted to humans from civet cats, while MERS-CoV is transmitted to humans from camels [25]. According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the virus is spreading from person to person mainly via respiratory droplets that people cough, sneeze, or exhale [25]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are closely monitoring the transmission of COVID-19, which is affecting almost all countries around the globe, causing thousands of deaths. Previous outbreaks of related coronaviruses, particularly MERS-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV), showed that food is not a route of transmission for these relevant viruses [26,27]. At the moment (16 April 2020), there is no evidence to conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is different in this respect. Transmission is indeed possible if an infected individual touches food, and shortly afterward, another individual collects it and touches its eyes or mucous membranes of the mouth or throat [6,28]. Fresh foods may also be similarly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before being frozen. In this case, the transmission may happen. For instance, it is known that MERS and SARS-CoV-1 can remain infectious for up to 2 years in a frozen state [28].
Thereby, the handling of packages should be followed by extensive hand washing or sanitizing in order to minimize any risk from touching food potentially exposed to coronavirus [29]. Besides, the FDA suggested that sanitization and cleaning of surfaces is a preferred precaution for food restaurants and kitchens compared to environmental testing for the COVID-19 virus [27]. Nevertheless, in some food-serving places, other precautions have been taken. For instance, some health authorities, restaurants, and cafeterias in Central Europe (Belgium) stopped serving rare steaks and meats [30]. However, these precautions are mainly related to food handling and preparation practices suggested by the WHO mainly to avoid cross-contamination between cooked and uncooked foods, including, as mentioned, cooking meat thoroughly and others (e.g., washing hands) [30].

4. Food Security with the Globe’s Population Lockdown

Since one-third of the world’s population is on lockdown (29 March 2020) [31], global food security alerts have arisen. Food systems incorporate all the different stages of food production from farm to fork (e.g., processing, distribution and preparation activities, consumption, and finally discharge) and various involved parts (e.g., infrastructure, agricultural inputs, landscape, farmers, retailers, shipping, and institutions) [32], and the lockdown has complicated the interactions among them.
According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), supermarket shelves remained stock up until 29 March 2020. However, according to more recent reports, food supplies will be massively disrupted, and people going hungry could double, unless nations and governmental institutions act [33]. To avoid massive food shortages, it is of the highest importance that countries should keep the food supply chains going. In line with this, FAO is suggesting specific strategies, e.g., expanding emergency food assistance programs and providing immediate assistance to the agricultural production of smallholders by boosting e-commerce. Likewise, it proposes focusing on key logistics bottlenecks (e.g., hampered food transportation across provinces and perishable foods like fishery, vegetables, and fruits), addressing tax and trade policies to keep the supply chain moving and implementing fiscal measures in the case that food prices jump [34].
In the regions of Wuhan and Northern Italy, where COVID-19 prevailed in the first months of the pandemic, target measures by China and Italy, respectively, were taken banning profiteering, illicit trade, and hoarding of food products [35,36]. These measures restricted acute food shortages in the affected areas. Empty food shelves were observed temporarily (e.g., due to panic buying of supplies) and mainly in urban areas where vegetables like cauliflower and green onions could not be shipped out. Authorities approached food enterprises to gather information about their supplies of staple commodities like rice and fresh produce (e.g., vegetables) and connected them with sellers. Popular shopping mobile applications (apps) (e.g., the platform of Pinduoduo that assists farmers in finding alternative buyers in small city centers, e-commerce apps by and Alibaba Group) were also used for this purpose [36]. Besides, China assured the sufficient nourishment of the local population by releasing at least 300,000 tons of pork reserves [36]. Italy implemented relevant laws to force food makers to keep reserves for emergency purposes [35]. This practice resulted in a moderate reduction of agricultural production. However, according to industry sources, it is anticipated that prices will increase [35].
Other countries are also struggling to keep their food supplies available for the population. Indeed, in countries like U.S. and Japan, where governments do not often intervene in commerce, there are questions on how to balance the need to keep production going and the need to protect the workers [36]. Farmers are restricted in accessing markets, buying inputs, and selling products; thus, fresh produces remain at the farms and are lost or wasted. Intervention measures should target bringing smallholder producers closer to collection centers with capacity as well as facilitating e-commerce platforms to reduce mobility [34].
Besides, we have now an opportunity to promote practices and Industry 4.0 technologies suggested to tackle the well-known problem of food loss and food waste. In particular, information and communication technologies (ICTs), apps, Internet of Things (IoT) platforms, BIG Data, and artificial technology can be used to collect real-time data in order to improve the communication between suppliers and buyers and simplify the redistribution of foods. Apps using Big Data and artificial intelligence could be implemented to connect farmers and suppliers with markets and get acute responses if any alterations of demand occur [37]. Similarly, ICTs could be enacted during on-farm handling, postharvest, storage, and food transportation. For instance, the implementation of ICTs could extend the shelf-life of fresh produce by minimizing delays in the transport of imported products at the points of exit and entry [37]. ICTs can also help to monitor uncrewed vehicles and agricultural drones that have been suggested as a practice to reduce human contact in agriculture [34]. Value Stream Mapping is another tool that ensures the proper management of the supply chain from farm to fork and the identification of food loss-generating resources [38]. Several companies (e.g., IntechOpen Limited, Creately) have developed related software that offers the visualization of material flow and the monitoring of process steps for producing and delivering products.
The food supply system will also need to consider those items that are being stockpiled by replenishing them quickly and safely. The mobilization of food banks, non-governmental organizations, community-based groups, and private charities to deliver food (as families are staying home) during the lockdown period could help in this direction [34]. These institutions have relevant knowledge in managing delivery-at-home operations that are highly dependent on volunteer workers. Likewise, they have well-organized delivery routes and networks with farmers associations, retailers, and supermarkets. For example, food banks use apps (e.g., Food Cowboy) to collect unwanted surplus from food services and restaurants. The World Bank has developed an e-sourcebook to provide insights for agricultural smallholders and connect them with institutions and retailers [39]. Besides, food banks can also help countries, bringing collection centers of high capacity closer to smallholder producers in order to reduce the need for mobility [34].

5. Sustainability of Food Systems in the New Era of Pandemic Crises

Food systems affect human health directly and indirectly, and today it is more urgent than ever that they should become sustainable. In 2015, the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development declared the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which comprise an urgent call for action by developed and developing countries in a global partnership [40]. The food systems play a crucial role in achieving UN SDGs, e.g., to end hunger through achieving food security and improved nutrition (SDG2) and to ensure sustainable consumption and production (SDG12). Moreover, it is essential to halve the per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels, reduce food losses along supply chains (SDG 12.3), ensure healthy lives, and promote well-being for all ages [40]. For instance, the environmental and economic impacts of food waste make up at least 15% [41] of the impacts of the entire food value chain.
SDGs require the optimum utilization of all produced raw materials by the food systems and integrated activities throughout all stages of the food chain. Efforts begin by reducing postharvest losses [42] and then move on to processing and retailing, with the implementation of non-thermal technologies that ensure food safety [43,44,45,46,47], the recapture of bioactive compounds from food processing by-products, and their re-utilization in the food chain [48,49,50,51].
However, the current food systems are not sustainable. In particular, one-third (approximately 1.3 billion tn/year, which is equivalent to 3300 Mtn of CO2 emissions/year) of food produced globally is wasted [52]. A more recent estimate suggests that almost 14% of food is lost in stages before the retail level (e.g., agriculture, harvest, slaughter, and catch) [53]. As the global population is about to reach 9.8 billion by 2050 (UN, 2017), food security may decrease, leading to new food crises like the one of 2007–2008. Likewise, under these circumstances, people in territories of high population density seek food sources in all kinds of animals and insects. The safety and hygienic conditions of animal-based food sources during retailing and cooking in this kind of big local markets (often selling live animals) are challenging to be monitored by authorities. Cheng et al. [54] suggested that the possibility of the re-emergence of novel viruses from animals or laboratories should not be ignored, because bats comprise a vast reservoir of SARS-CoV-like viruses. Today, 13 years later, we are facing an outbreak of SARS-CoV2 that has common characteristics with bat coronavirus [3]. Likewise, the first infections occurred in the Huanan Seafood Market [2], where not only seafood, but also live and slaughtered bats, marmots, pheasants, snakes, deer, and organs of rabbits are sold [55]. Regardless of this being a coincidence or not, the world and subsequently the food systems should adapt in the new era of pandemics. There is evidence that the likelihood of pandemics has increased substantially over the past century due to urbanization, global travel, and integration, intensive exploitation of natural resources, and modifications in the use of land [56,57]. As urbanization and global population will increase over the next decades, this trend is expected to continue and intensify [39].
It is thus time to reconsider the food systems and design their future, i.e., it is essential to increase their resilience [58]. The current food systems are highly dependent on animal-based protein sources that are not sustainable from an environmental point of view but also form a health and food security perspective. For example, meat consumption is proportional to the amount of greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions [59], whereas the consumption of red meat has been associated with chronic diseases like cancer [60]. Besides, the current food systems often have food safety gaps allowing the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms. The increasing demands for proteins, the increasing population, as well as the depletion of resources lead researchers to investigate more sustainable and safer food sources in order to feed the world and meet markets’ needs [61].
Nowadays, researchers are seeking alternative protein sources everywhere. For instance, cockroach milk and cockroach flour may play a pivotal role in the solution to the food shortage in the decades to come ([62,63]. The current trends in alternative protein sources include the dietary shift from beef to poultry and pork (to reduce red meat consumption) [64], new plant-based sources (e.g., quinoa), insects, microalgae [61], and artificial meat that is lab-grown under aseptic conditions. In some cases (e.g., the production of lab-grown meat), there is not enough evidence that the alternative protein sources under investigation are sustainable enough [65]. This status may change in the years to come if the production cost decreases. Besides, some of the alternative protein sources (e.g., microalgae) may also be a source of bioactive ingredients (e.g., polyphenols, flavonoids, lipids, and vitamins) that could be recovered and reutilized in the foreseen growing functional foods sector [61]. Food-processing by-products (from meat or fish processing or the dairy sector) comprise a rich source of proteins and other valuable compounds (e.g., antioxidants) that could be recovered and reintroduced in the food chain [42,46,61,66].

6. Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic crisis has created a new era. We are still trying to figure out the consequences for humanity, economy, and, subsequently, food systems. Academic researchers and food sector experts will have to face many significant challenges, e.g., ensuring food safety [67] and food security [68], introducing Industry 4.0 tools to reduce losses and waste of food, as well as identifying alternative and safe protein sources that meet the nutritional expectations of consumers [61]. At the same time, they should introduce innovations fast enough with the imminent economic crisis in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, offering acceptable and economically competitive products and developing functional foods fortified with bioactive compounds and antioxidants that promote health and support consumers’ immune system. There is undoubtedly a need to avoid “business as usual” practices, to think out of the box and accelerate efforts to develop sustainable and modern food systems, e.g., to reduce the cost of aseptic lab-grown meat, reduce the cost of food waste recovery and reutilization in the food chain, and develop new and large food supply chains based on insects’ and microalgae proteins.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.


  1. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  2. Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y.; Ren, R.; Leung, K.S.M.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Wong, J.Y.; et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Coronavirus COVID-19 (2019-nCoV). Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2020).
  5. Countries where Coronavirus has Spread—Worldometer. Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2020).
  6. How Coronavirus Spreads | CDC. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  7. Coronavirus: Loss of Smell and Taste may Be Hidden Symptom of COVID-19—Business Insider. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  8. Huff, A.G.; Beyeler, W.E.; Kelley, N.S.; McNitt, J.A. How resilient is the United States’ food system to pandemics? J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2015, 5, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Das, U.N. Can Bioactive Lipids Inactivate Coronavirus (COVID-19)? Arch. Med. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gibson, A.; Edgar, J.D.; Neville, C.E.; Gilchrist, S.E.C.M.; McKinley, M.C.; Patterson, C.C.; Young, I.S.; Woodside, J.V. Effect of fruit and vegetable consumption on immune function in older people: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1429–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Naik, S.R.; Thakare, V.N.; Joshi, F.P. Functional foods and herbs as potential immunoadjuvants and medicines in maintaining healthy immune system: A commentary. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2010, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carr, A.C.; Maggini, S. Vitamin C and immune function. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hemilä, H. Vitamin C intake and susceptibility to pneumonia. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1997, 16, 836–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qi, G.; Brand, D.; Zheng, S. Role of Vitamin A in the Immune System. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sinha, S.; Cheng, K.; Aldape, K.; Schiff, E.; Ruppin, E. Systematic Cell Line-Based Identification of Drugs Modifying ACE2 Expression. Preprints 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Ye, D.; Liu, Q. A review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) based on current evidence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 105948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nonnecke, B.J.; McGill, J.L.; Ridpath, J.F.; Sacco, R.E.; Lippolis, J.D.; Reinhardt, T.A. Acute phase response elicited by experimental bovine diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection is associated with decreased vitamin D and E status of vitamin-replete preruminant calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5566–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Adem, S.; Eyupoglu, V.; Sarfraz, I.; Rasul, A.; Ali, M. Identification of Potent COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) Inhibitors from Natural Polyphenols: An in Silico Strategy Unveils a Hope against CORONA. Preprints 2020, 2020030333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Im, K.; Kim, J.; Min, H. Ginseng, the natural effectual antiviral: Protective effects of Korean red ginseng against viral infection. J. Ginseng Res. 2016, 40, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kolodziej, H. Antimicrobial, antiviral and immunomodulatory activity studies of pelargonium sidoides (EPs® 7630) in the context of health promotion. Pharmaceuticals 2011, 4, 1295–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Luo, H.; Tang, Q.L.; Shang, Y.X.; Liang, S.B.; Yang, M.; Robinson, N.; Liu, J. Can Chinese Medicine Be Used for Prevention of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)? A Review of Historical Classics, Research Evidence and Current Prevention Programs. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 26, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, Y.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, X. Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Patients Infected with 2019-New Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A Review and Perspective. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1708–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ang, L.; Lee, H.W.; Choi, J.Y.; Zhang, J.; Lee, M.S. Herbal medicine and pattern identification for treating COVID-19: A rapid review of guidelines. Integr. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 100407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Consumer Research Supports Global Demand for Immunity Products. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  25. Q & A on COVID-19. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  26. Coronavirus: No Evidence that Food is a Source or Transmission Route. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  27. Food Safety and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | FDA. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  28. Can the New Type of Coronavirus be Transmitted via Food and Objects?—BfR. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  29. FSHN20-21/FS349: COVID-19 and Food Safety FAQ: Is Coronavirus a Concern with Takeout? Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  30. No Evidence of COVID-19 Transmission through Food, Says EFSA – Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  31. Countries that are on Lockdown Because of Coronavirus—Business Insider. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  32. EC FOOD 2030 Independent Expert Group. Recipe for Change: An Agenda for Sustainable Food System; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; ISBN 9789279803567. [Google Scholar]
  33. Coronavirus could double number of people going hungry | World news | The Guardian. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  34. COVID-19 and the risk to food supply chains: How to respond? |Policy Support and Governance| Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  35. Coronavirus: Italy’s food Industry Warns of “Brake” on Sector Growth. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  36. How China Kept Its Supermarkets Stocked as Coronavirus Raged—WSJ. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  37. Flanagan, K.; Robertson, K.; Hanson, C. Reducing Food Loss and Waste: Setting a Global Action Agenda; World Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  38. Wesana, J.; Gellynck, X.; Dora, M.K.; Pearce, D.; de Steur, H. Measuring food losses in the supply chain through value stream mapping: A case study in the dairy sector. In Saving Food: Production, Supply Chain, Food Waste and Food Consumption; Galanakis, C., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Waltham, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. Madhav, N.; Oppenheim, B.; Gallivan, M.; Mulembakani, P.; Rubin, E.; Wolfe, N. Pandemics: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation. In Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 9): Improving Health and Reducing Poverty; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; pp. 315–345. ISBN 9781464805271. [Google Scholar]
  40. Home: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  41. Scherhaufer, S.; Moates, G.; Hartikainen, H.; Waldron, K.; Obersteiner, G. Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe. Waste Manag. 2018, 77, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galanakis, C.M. Lipids and Edible Oils: Properties, Processing and Applications; Academis Press: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780128173725. [Google Scholar]
  43. Deng, Q.; Zinoviadou, K.G.; Galanakis, C.M.; Orlien, V.; Grimi, N.; Vorobiev, E.; Lebovka, N.; Barba, F.J. The Effects of Conventional and Non-conventional Processing on Glucosinolates and Its Derived Forms, Isothiocyanates: Extraction, Degradation, and Applications. Food Eng. Rev. 2015, 7, 357–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Roselló-Soto, E.; Barba, F.J.; Parniakov, O.; Galanakis, C.M.; Lebovka, N.; Grimi, N.; Vorobiev, E. High Voltage Electrical Discharges, Pulsed Electric Field, and Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Protein and Phenolic Compounds from Olive Kernel. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Roselló-Soto, E.; Galanakis, C.M.; Brnčić, M.; Orlien, V.; Trujillo, F.J.; Mawson, R.; Knoerzer, K.; Tiwari, B.K.; Barba, F.J. Clean recovery of antioxidant compounds from plant foods, by-products and algae assisted by ultrasounds processing. Modeling approaches to optimize processing conditions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 42, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sarfarazi, M.; Jafari, S.M.; Rajabzadeh, G.; Galanakis, C.M. Evaluation of microwave-assisted extraction technology for separation of bioactive components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 111978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Galanakis, C.M. Emerging technologies for the production of nutraceuticals from agricultural by-products: A viewpoint of opportunities and challenges. Food Bioprod. Process. 2013, 91, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Galanakis, C.M. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Galanakis, C.M.; Tsatalas, P.; Galanakis, I.M. Implementation of phenols recovered from olive mill wastewater as UV booster in cosmetics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 111, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Galanakis, C.M.; Tsatalas, P.; Charalambous, Z.; Galanakis, I.M. Polyphenols recovered from olive mill wastewater as natural preservatives in extra virgin olive oils and refined olive kernel oils. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 10, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bursać Kovačević, D.; Barba, F.J.; Granato, D.; Galanakis, C.M.; Herceg, Z.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Putnik, P. Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) for the green recovery of bioactive compounds and steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  53. State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction | Policy Support and Governance| Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  54. Cheng, V.C.C.; Lau, S.K.P.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Kwok, Y.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 660–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Jalava, K. First respiratory transmitted food borne outbreak? Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 226, 113490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jones, K.E.; Patel, N.G.; Levy, M.A.; Storeygard, A.; Balk, D.; Gittleman, J.L.; Daszak, P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Morse, S.S. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1995, 1, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ensuring Food Security in the Era of COVID-19—United Nations Sustainable Development. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  59. Vieux, F.; Perignon, M.; Gazan, R.; Darmon, N. Dietary changes needed to improve diet sustainability: Are they similar across Europe? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Springmann, M.; Wiebe, K.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Sulser, T.B.; Rayner, M.; Scarborough, P. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: A global modelling analysis with country-level detail. Lancet Planet. Heal. 2018, 2, e451–e461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Galanakis, C. Preface. In Proteins: Sustainable Source, Processing and Applications; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Waltham, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  62. De Oliveira, L.M.; da Silva Lucas, A.J.; Cadaval, C.L.; Mellado, M.S. Bread enriched with flour from cinereous cockroach (Nauphoeta cinerea). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 44, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Niaz, K.; Zaplatic, E.; Spoor, J. Highlight report: Diploptera Functata (cockroach) milk as next superfood. EXCLI J. 2018, 17, 721–723. [Google Scholar]
  64. Aleksandrowicz, L.; Green, R.; Joy, E.J.M.; Smith, P.; Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chriki, S.; Hocquette, J.-F. The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Galanakis, C.M. Separation of functional macromolecules and micromolecules: From ultrafiltration to the border of nanofiltration. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 42, 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Galanakis, C.M. Food Quality and Shelf Life; Academis Press: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780128171912. [Google Scholar]
  68. Galanakis, C.M. Food Security and Nutrition; Galanakis, C., Ed.; Elsevier-Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780128209325. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The food systems in the era of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic crisis.
Figure 1. The food systems in the era of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic crisis.
Foods 09 00523 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galanakis, C.M. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods 2020, 9, 523.

AMA Style

Galanakis CM. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods. 2020; 9(4):523.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galanakis, Charis M. 2020. "The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis" Foods 9, no. 4: 523.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop