Next Article in Journal
Introduction to the Special Issue: Advanced Strategies to Preserve Quality and Extend Shelf Life of Foods
Previous Article in Journal
Postprandial Glucose Response after Consuming Low-Carbohydrate, Low-Calorie Rice Cooked in a Carbohydrate-Reducing Rice Cooker
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Purée and Wheat Flour Blends on β-Carotene, Selected Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Bread

1
Food and Nutritional Evaluation Laboratory (FANEL), International Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi 25171-00603, Kenya
2
Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
Food Chemistry and Technology Research Centre, Department of Food Technology, Ghent University Global Campus, 119-5, Songdomunhwa-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21985, Korea
4
Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Medway Campus, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK
5
Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(7), 1051; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071051
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 6 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Grain)

Abstract

:
Partial substitution of wheat flour with orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) purée in bread can increase vitamin A intake among consumers. The study investigated the influence of wheat flour substitution with 20–50% of OFSP purée on proximate composition, color, β-carotene, water activity, and microbial keeping quality. The moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, total ash, crude fiber, and carbohydrate in bread ranged from 28.6–32.7%, 9.9–10.6%, 5.0–5.5%, 1.9–3.2%, 1.4–1.8%, and 79.1–80.9%, respectively. β-carotene, total ash, and crude fiber contents in bread, and Hunter color values a*, b*, chroma, and ∆E significantly increased with the addition of OFSP purée. Total viable counts (TVC), yeast, and molds in bread ranged from 2.82–3.64 log10 cfu/g and 1.48–2.16 log10 cfu/g, respectively, on the last day of storage. Water activity, TVC, and fungal counts were low in sweet potato composite bread as compared to white bread. Total β-carotene in OFSP bread ranged from 1.9–5.4 mg/100 g (on dry weight). One hundred grams of bread portion enriched with 40% and 50% OFSP purée provides more than 50% of vitamin A dietary requirements to children aged 4–8 years. Incorporation of up to 50% OFSP purée in wheat flour produces a relatively shelf-stable, nutritious, and health-promoting functional bread.

1. Introduction

Bread is a global staple food that plays a vital role in food security [1]. Over the past decades, the change in food habits has tremendously increased the demand for wheat-based foods, such as bread, in developing countries [2]. Wheat flour is the main raw material for the processing of bread. It has proteins with superior baking properties [3]. Regardless of the unique qualities of wheat flour proteins for bread-making, wheat flour is low in health-promoting bioactive compounds, such as beta-carotene [4]. Wheat flour contains high amounts of digestible starch [5] with a high glycemic index, making wheat bread unsuitable for consumption by patients suffering from diabetes, hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases [6]. Furthermore, the soaring prices of wheat on the global market and concerns over the increase in importation in sub-Saharan Africa warrant the interest to partially substitute it in bakery applications. This would reduce dependency on wheat imports and lower the cost of production for bakeries and consequently generate more profits.
Vitamin A is an essential micronutrient for human health. It is primarily involved in vision, reproduction, growth, and cellular communication [7,8]. Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a prevalent health problem in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and South Asia. It results from consumption of diets low in bioavailable vitamin A [9,10]. Limited access to diets rich in vitamin A has been a major factor contributing to the high prevalence of VAD among populations in SSA [11,12]. VAD is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness, morbidity, and mortality from infections in children and pregnant women in low and middle-income countries [12]. According to the World Health Organization Database, approximately 190 million preschool children and pregnant women suffer from VAD worldwide [12]. A previous study by [9] has further reported 40% of children below five years are deficient in vitamin A.
Strategies, such as dietary diversification, vitamin A supplementation, and food fortification, are being explored to address vitamin A deficiency. These approaches are however not feasible and sustainable [12]. Further, animal food sources rich in vitamin A, such as dairy products, fish, and meat, are not consumed regularly by the majority of poor households in developing countries [10,11]. Alternatively, these households obtain about 82% of their total dietary vitamin A from plant-based foods [12]. For these reasons, plant-based foods and biofortified crops, such as sweet potatoes, offer cheap and sustainable alternatives for alleviating VAD [10,13]. Among the carotenoids, β-carotene is the most important provitamin A carotenoid. It is found in fruits, leafy green vegetables, orange, and yellow vegetables [8,10].
Biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) is being grown and promoted as a food-based strategy to address the problem of VAD in SSA [11,14]. OFSP is rich in beta-carotene, a precursor for Vitamin A. An ex-ante assessment by [13] demonstrated that OFSP could largely contribute to fighting VAD in SSA. A different study by [10] recommends OFSP as a long-term strategy in combating VAD in children in SSA. About 100–125 g of boiled or steamed OFSP adequately provides the recommended dietary intake (RDA) of retinol equivalent per day in children below five years [10,13,15,16]. Unlike many vegetables, OFSP is also a good source of energy, antioxidants, vitamins C, E, K, B vitamins, and minerals such as phosphorus, potassium, and dietary fiber [17].
OFSP is bulky, highly perishable, and mainly consumed as boiled or steamed in SSA. However, the majority of the urban population has a low preference towards boiled sweet potato [18]. Efforts to expand the processing and utilization of OFSP in SSA are still in progress. It is currently processed into a purée for partial wheat flour substitution in the production of bread by bakeries in SSA [19,20]. The purée is prepared by washing, peeling, steaming, and mashing sweet potatoes which retain more than 90% of beta-carotene. Conventionally, the production of flour by drying has been a practical approach for enhancing the shelf-life of sweet potatoes. Although this saves on problems related to perishability, storage and transportation, significant loss in carotenoids occurs [21,22]. Regardless, several studies have reported the use of OFSP flour as an ingredient in baked goods [3,21,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, the incorporation of OFSP purée in foods is a more ideal approach for potentially improving vitamin A dietary intake [27] in Kenya and SSA in general. A study by [28] revealed a high preference and willingness to pay for OFSP bread among consumers in urban areas. Thus, OFSP bread can help in fighting VAD in children, pregnant women, and lactating mothers in urban areas [29].
Bakeries in SSA are currently substituting wheat flour with up to 30% of OFSP purée in the production of sweet potato bread [19]. However, the potential to increase the current substitution level to produce a more nutritious composite bread exists. A few studies have reported sweet potato purée as an ingredient in baked goods in regard to their sensory attributes, physical properties, consumer preference, and contribution to vitamin A [27,28,29,30,31]. A recent study by [5] found that increasing the proportion of OFSP purée concentration (10 to 50%) in bread improves the bioacccessibility of β-carotene and alters the digestion of starch, beneficial for human health. However, there is limited information on the effect of substituting wheat flour with different proportions of OFSP purée on nutritional and some physicochemical properties of sweet potato bread.
The shelf-life of bread is relatively short. It is limited mainly by staling and spoilage by microorganisms, such as Bacillus subtilis, yeast, and molds. There has also been an attempt to assess the shelf-life of bread substituted with 30% OFSP purée [31] but more information on different levels of substitution is required. OFSP flour has recently been shown to decrease staling in wheat–OFSP composite bread [3]. On the contrary, OFSP purée can support microbial growth and act as a source of contamination in bread if good hygiene practices are not observed [32], hence the need for microbial quality assessment. To date, there is no information on the influence of OFSP purée proportion on microbial quality and shelf-life of bread.
The objectives of this study, therefore, were: (1) to develop sweet potato composite bread from different proportions of wheat flour and OFSP purée, and (2) to investigate the effects of wheat flour substitution with 20–50% of OFSP purée on proximate composition, β-carotene, color, water activity and microbial shelf-life of the composite bread.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Sweet potato purée was prepared from fresh OFSP roots of the “VITA” variety at the purée processing company in Homa Bay County, Kenya. It was prepared following methods described by [33,34]. The sweet potato roots were washed, hand-peeled, trimmed, and cut into 0.5 cm-thick slices using a mechanical slicer. Then, the slices were steamed for half an hour at 100 °C. The cooked sweet potato was cooled for 1 h on trays and comminuted into a purée using a puréeing machine (OMAS Food Machinery, AEE1T0, Euro ingredients limited, Oggiona con Santo Stefano, Italy). The purée was vacuum packed in 5 kg plastic bags and immediately stored in the freezer (−20 °C). The frozen purée was delivered to International Potato Centre (CIP-Nairobi) in ice-cold boxes and stored at −20 °C before analysis.
All the ingredients: commercial baker’s flour (United Millers Limited, Kisumu, Kenya, protein content 10% on dry matter basis); bread improver (VITABAKE D 300, Pack Ingredients, Nairobi, Kenya), formulated with corn starch, ascorbic acid, calcium carbonate, and baking enzymes (α-amylase and hemicellulase); salt (Kensalt Ltd., Mombasa, Kenya), sugar (West Sugar Co. Limited, Kakamega, Kenya), baker’s yeast (Dalet Foods, Nairobi, Kenya), and cooking fat (Bidco, Africa Ltd., Thika, Kenya) were purchased from a retail outlet in Nairobi. All the ingredients were purchased from a retail chain store in Nairobi and formulated as shown in Table 1. Wheat flour was mixed with OFSP purée in the ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, and 50:50. These were used to prepare 20, 30, 40, and 50% sweet potato purée bread. White bread was prepared with 100% wheat flour as a control for the study.

2.2. Bread Making

The bread was produced by straight dough according to [31,35] with modifications. The dough for each treatment was prepared in three replicates while maintaining the processing conditions for both sweet potato bread and wheat flour bread (control). Yeast was dissolved in warm water at 30 °C, followed by mixing of the dry ingredients (Table 1). Melted fat, sweet potato purée, and other ingredients were then mixed (Tombak bakery and confectionary F2 mixer). The ingredients were mixed for 3 min at low speed, followed by 5 min mixing at high speed. After complete mixing, the dough was weighed, cut into 450 g portions, and molded into rolls. The molded doughs were placed in baking tins smeared with a layer of oil and proofed at 30 °C for 45 min at 85% relative humidity. The proofed dough was baked in a preheated oven (FİMAK Rotary Oven, Turkey) at 230 °C for 30 min [24]. The loaves of bread were depanned and cooled on clean and sanitized shelves at (23 ± 1 °C) for 2 h [36]. The bread samples were vacuum-packed and aseptically transferred to the laboratory for analysis.

2.3. Sample Preparation

The bread was sliced manually using sterilized kitchen knives. Nine slices were selected from each bread for analysis. They were equally selected from the center, and both ends of each bread. The crust was manually cut and separated from the crumb and grinded separately for beta-carotene analysis. The crust (20 mm × 20 mm × ~4 mm) and the crumb (20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm) were also prepared manually for color measurement. Samples for proximate composition and water activity analyses were milled without the separation of the crumb and the crust. Bread samples for the analysis of water activity and microbial profile were analyzed immediately while the rest of the samples were kept in a clean and sanitized oven space at 25 °C to mimic the normal shelf storage conditions for bread.
Sample preparation, extraction, and analysis were performed under golden-yellow lights to prevent the degradation of beta-carotene. All the samples were analyzed for moisture content, protein, fat, fiber, ash, β-carotene, color, water activity, total viable counts, and fungal counts. All the analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Determination of Proximate Composition in Bread

Moisture content, crude fat, crude protein, crude fiber, and total ash were determined according to the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International [37].

2.4.1. Determination of Moisture Content

The moisture content was determined by the method of AOAC 934.01 [37]. Two grams (2 g) of well-homogenized bread samples were transferred to the dried weighed dishes. The samples on the dishes were dried in the oven for 2 h at 105 °C until achieving a constant weight. The dried samples were removed from the oven, cooled in a desiccator at room temperature, and reweighed:
M o i s t u r e   ( % ) = ( W 1 W 2 ) × 100 S w
where W1 is the weight of the dish and fresh sample, W2 is the weight of the dish and dried sample, and Sw is the sample weight.

2.4.2. Determination of Total Ash Content

The ash content was determined according to the methods of AOAC 942.05 [37]. Two grams (2 g) of the sample were weighed and placed into a dry crucible of predetermined weight. The sample-containing crucibles were charred on a hot plate and placed in a muffle furnace at 550 °C. The samples were ignited for 6 h. The samples were removed from the furnace, cooled in a desiccator at room temperature, and weighed:
T o t a l   A s h   ( % ) = ( W 1 W 2 ) × 100 S w ,
where W1 is the weight of the ash and crucible after incineration, W2 is the weight of the empty crucible, and Sw is the initial weight of the sample.

2.4.3. Determination of Crude Fat

The fat content was performed by acid hydrolysis and Solvent extraction method as described by AOAC 920.39 [37]. Five grams (5 g) of the sample were weighed in a 300 mL hydrolysis tube and hydrolyzed with 100 mL of 4 N HCl at 170 °C for 1 h. The samples were filtered, dried in an oven (at 70 °C) for 8 h. The dried samples were transferred into extraction thimbles and extracted for fat using SER 148 Solvent Extractor (VELP Scientific, Italy) with petroleum ether as the extraction solvent. The receiver flask was then dried in the oven at 100 °C for 30 min to evaporate traces of the solvent. The flask was cooled in the desiccator to room temperature and reweighed:
C r u d e   F a t   ( % ) = ( W f W ) × 100 S w ,
where Wf is the weight of the receiver flask and extracted fat, W is the weight of the empty receiver flask, and Sw is the weight of the sample used.

2.4.4. Determination of Crude Fiber

The crude fiber content in bread was established according to the AOAC 978.10 methods [37]. Two grams of defatted sample were transferred into a 1 L beaker and digested on a hot plate with 25 mL of 2.5 M H2SO4 for 30 min. The volume was maintained at 200 mL with hot distilled water while stirring the sample during the digestion process. It was then filtered through the glass wool on a Buchner funnel. The second digestion step was conducted using 2.5 M NaOH. The sample was filtered again through the same glass wool. The residue on the glass wool was rinsed with 3 mL of ethanol. The glass wool together with the residue were dried in an oven at 105 °C for 30 min until a constant weight (W1) was achieved. The oven-dried samples were then incinerated in a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 3 h. The incinerated sample was cooled in a desiccator at room temperature and reweighed:
C r u d e   F i b e r   ( % ) = ( W 1 W 2 ) × 100 S w ,
where W1 is the weight of the crucible and sample before incineration, W2 is the weight of the crucible containing ash, and Sw is the weight of the sample.

2.4.5. Determination of Crude Protein

Protein content was performed by the Kjeldahl method as described by AOAC [37]. Exactly 0.5 g of the bread sample was weighed into 100 mL digestion tubes, and 10 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was added with 2 g of Kjeldahl tablet (catalyst). Samples were digested until a pure colorless solution was obtained. Kjeldahl distiller was used for distillation with 35% NaOH (w/w) to release ammonia from the sample. The distilled ammonia was collected in a flask with 50 mL of 4% boric acid mixed with bromocresol green and methyl red indicators. The distilled sample was titrated against 0.1 HCl. The protein content was calculated by multiplying the value of nitrogen by a factor of 5.7 [38]:
C r u d e   p r o t e i n   ( % ) = ( a × b × 14 × 5.7 ) × 100 W
where a is the normality of the acid, b is the volume of the standard acid used (mL), W is the weight of the sample (g), and 5.7 is the conversion factor for protein from % nitrogen.

2.4.6. Available Carbohydrates

The percentage of available carbohydrates was calculated by subtracting the total contents of moisture, total ash, crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber content from 100%:
Available   carbohydrate = 100 ( M o i s t u r e   ( % ) + P r o t e i n   ( % ) + F a t   ( % ) + A s h   ( % ) + F i b e r   ( % ) )

2.4.7. Gross Food Energy

The gross energy content of bread was estimated by Atwater’s conversion equation [39]:
F o o d   e n e r g y ( k c a l g ) = ( % A C × 4 ) + ( % T F × 9 ) + ( % C P × 4 )  
where AC is the available carbohydrate, TF is total fat, and CP is the crude protein.

2.4.8. Quality Control

All the proximate composition analyses were performed in triplicate. Cereal-based food (FC 290, PT-FC-770) from LGC Standards Proficiency Testing UK, previously used for proficiency testing in the lab, and an in-house quality control food material (wheat bran), were used as reference materials for quality control.

2.5. Extraction and Quantification of Beta-Carotene

2.5.1. Extraction of β-Carotene in OFSP Purée Composite Bread

β-carotene extraction in bread was conducted by saponification and extraction with hexane as described by [40] with modifications. Approximately 2 g of each sample (crust and crumb) was weighed separately in 25 mL screw-capped glass tubes. Then, 6 mL of ethanol (with 0.1% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)) and 250 µL of echinenone (internal standard) were added. The samples were further homogenized, vortexed for 1 min, and incubated in a water bath (SW23GB, JULABO) at 85 °C for 10 min. This was followed by the addition of 120 µL of 80% KOH (w/v) to each tube, mixing, and further incubation at 85 °C for 5 min. The tubes with the samples were removed from the water bath and immediately cooled in a bucket full of ice. Distilled water (5 mL) was added to each tube while still immersed in ice and vortexed for 1 min. This was followed by the addition of 3 mL hexane (≥99.8% HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA,) and mixing on the vortex mixer for 1 min. The tubes were then centrifuged (Eppendorf, Centrifuge 5810) at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The upper phase of hexane was extracted using a Pasteur pipette into separate clean 25 mL Pyrex glass test tubes. The extraction and separation processes were repeated thrice by adding 3 mL hexane to each sample pellet in the tubes. β-carotene extraction was confirmed to be complete after obtaining a white residue and a clear upper liquid phase. The extract was washed by addition of 5 mL of distilled water, vortexing, and centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The upper hexane phase was separated into 15 mL clean test tubes and evaporated under a stream of nitrogen using a nitrogen evaporating machine (N-Evap machine, Organomation, Model OA-8125, River Rd, Berlin, MA, USA) with a water bath at 40 °C. Dried tubes with carotenoids were then reconstituted with 5 mL of methanol and tetrahydrofuran (HPLC grade) (85:15 v/v) and filtered through a 0.2 µm PFTE syringe filter into amber vials for HPLC analysis.

2.5.2. Extraction of Beta-Carotene in Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Purée

β-carotene extraction in OFSP purée was performed according to [41] with some modifications. Approximately 1 g of the sample was weighed (in triplicate) in a 25 mL test tube, followed by the addition of 5 mL methanol and 250 µL of the internal standard. The sample was vortexed for 1 min and incubated at 70 °C for 10 min. The sample was vortexed, centrifuged for 10 min (at 3000 rpm), and the upper phase was transferred into 25 mL volumetric flask. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) (5 mL) was added to the sample in the tube, mixed on the vortex for one minute, centrifuged, and separated. The extraction was repeated three times. The flask was filled to the mark with THF and mixed on the vortex for 1 min. Two milliliters (2 mL) of the extract were transferred to a separate tube and washed by adding 3 mL of distilled water, 4 mL of hexane, and 0.5 mL of methanol. The samples were centrifuged for 3 min at 3000 rpm. The upper phase (hexane) was separated and dried in a stream of nitrogen using the N-Evap machine. The dried tubes were reconstituted with 2 mL of methanol and THF (HPLC grade) (85:15 v/v) and filtered through a 0.2 µm PFTE syringe filter into 2 mL-amber vials for HPLC analysis.

2.5.3. HPLC Conditions

Ten microliters (10 µL) of each sample were injected into the HPLC (Waters Alliance, 2695 Separations Module, Milford, MA, USA) with an auto-sampler and a UV-Vis photodiode array detector (PDA-2996). Empower software controlled the entire system and data acquisition. The extracts were resolved on a 150 mm × 4.6 mm, YMC C30, 3 µm particle size HPLC column (Wilmington, NC, USA) utilizing a reverse-phase gradient HPLC method. The mobile phases were methanol/tert-butyl methyl ether/water (85:12:3, v/v/v, with 1.5% ammonium acetate in the water-mobile phase A) and methanol/tert-butyl methyl ether/water (8:90:2, v/v/v, with 1% ammonium acetate in the water-mobile phase B). A linear gradient elution was employed and set as follows: 0–1 min, 100% A; 1–10 min, 90% A; 10–22 min, 45% A; 22–33 min, 5% A; 33–37 min, 5% A; 37–39 min, 100% A; 39–40 min, 100% A. The flow rate was maintained at 0.4 mL per minute and a run time of 40 min [40].

2.5.4. Quantification of β-Carotene in Purée and Bread

All-trans, 13-cis, and 9-cis β-carotene in the samples were identified based on their absorption spectra and retention time of their respective pure standards. Quantification was performed using the calibration curves of pure β-carotene standards after correcting for extraction efficiency based on recovery levels of echinenone [40].

2.5.5. Contribution of OFSP Purée–Wheat Composite Bread to Vitamin A Requirement

Retinol activity equivalents (RAE) were calculated according to the conversion factor of 12 µg of β-carotene to 1 µg of retinol [42]. Vitamin A activity of the cis-isomers of β-carotene was estimated to be half of the trans-β-carotene [21,43]. The contribution towards the recommended daily vitamin A body requirement to different groups: children (4–8 years), adolescents (10–18 years), adult males and females (19–65 years), and pregnant and lactating mothers was based on a portion of 100 g for each bread sample.

2.6. Determination of Color in Bread

Color measurement was based on Hunter L* (a measure of lightness), a* (a measure of greenness to redness), and b* (a measure of blueness to yellowness) values. The color of bread was determined using a Hunter color meter (Lovibond LC100, Parkland Dr, Sarasota, FL, USA) with standard illuminant D65, observation angle of 10°, and an aperture of 30 mm [21,36,44]. The Hunter color values for the crust (20 mm × 20 mm × ~4 mm) and the crumb (20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm) of bread were determined separately by pressing the chroma meter against the transparent glass petri dish (60 × 15 mm) filled with approximately 100 g of the sample. The instrument was calibrated using a standard white reference tile with values L* = 98.63, a* = 0, and b* = 0. Three readings were recorded from different positions of the petri dish with the sample. All the samples were analyzed in three replicates. The psychometric color terms chroma, hue angle, and delta E were calculated according to the methods of [45,46], as follows:
C h r o m a = a 2 + b 2
H u e   a n g l e   ( h ° ) = t a n 1 ( b a ) ,
Ɗ E = ( L 1 L 0 ) 2 + ( a 1 a 0 ) 2 + ( b 1 b 0 ) 2 ,
where L0, a0, and b0 are Hunter color values of white bread and L1, a1, and b1, are experimental color values of different sweet potato composite breads.

2.7. Determination of Water Activity in Bread

Water activity (aw) was determined by a water activity meter (Aqua Lab Series 4TE, Decagon Devices, Inc., NE Hopkins Ct., Pullman, WA, USA) [31]. The instrument was calibrated with 0.5 mol/kg, aw = 0.984 potassium chloride standard solution at 25 °C. Water activity was determined after 0, 3, and 6 days of storage. The analysis was performed in triplicate.

2.8. Microbial Analysis of Bread

Total mesophilic (total viable bacterial counts) and fungi were carried out to determine the microbial load of the bread samples by pour plate method according to [47,48] with modifications. Briefly, twenty-five grams (25 g) of each bread sample was mixed with 225 mL of sterile buffered peptone water, agitated vigorously, and allowed to settle. A ten-fold subsequent serial dilution series was performed with 0.85% saline water (NaCl) to obtain a colony count of 1 × 10−3/mL. Precisely 0.1 mL of each serial dilution was spread evenly and separately on Petri dishes with solidified plate count agar (PCA) for total counts and potato dextrose agar (PDA) for enumeration of yeasts and molds. All the analyses were performed in triplicate. Cultured PCA plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h, while PDA plates were incubated at 25 °C for five days. The colonies were enumerated and recorded after incubation. Microbial quality evaluation was conducted on day 0, day 3, and day 6 of storage. The analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were subjected to statistical evaluation using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test to determine the significant differences between bread quality characteristics of the various formulations. Pearson correlation was also performed to establish the relationship between the variables. The analyses were conducted using the statistical software for social sciences (SPSS 26.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical significance was defined as (p < 0.05). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using The Unscrambler X (Version 10.4, Oslo, Norway) to distinguish the bread samples based on their attributes.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate Composition of Baked Bread

Table 2 shows the proximate composition of the sweet potato purée, wheat flour, and sweet potato composite bread.
Moisture content is an essential food quality attribute that largely contributes to the physical, sensory, and microbial properties of bread. The moisture content of bread in this study varied significantly (p < 0.05), with the lowest value in white bread (28.6 g/100 g) and the highest in 50% OFSP purée bread (32.7 g/100 g). The range of moisture content in the current study is similar to the findings by [31,49]. Other studies by [36,50] have reported a higher moisture content of 36.6 to 41.6% and 32.8–37.4%, respectively, in sweet potato flour composite bread, contrary to findings in this study. The high moisture content in sweet potato bread is attributed to the high binding water capacity of sweet potato starch associated with weak molecular forces between the starch granules [51]. This avails more molecular surfaces for binding water during starch gelatinization and ultimately higher retained moisture content in baked bread [52,53]. On the other hand, the relatively low moisture content in white bread can be due to the low binding capacity of starch in wheat flour resulting in excessive loss of moisture during baking [53].
Lipids from wheat flour, shortenings, and dough strengtheners, influence dough development, fermentation, proofing, baking, and bread storage [54]. On the other hand, dietary fats and oils contribute to the taste of sweet potato bread and enhance the bio-accessibility of β-carotene [55,56,57]. The crude fat content of bread in this study ranged from 5.0 to 5.5%, and it was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Our findings report a similar range of crude fat content as [50]), but higher as compared to [26], which reported a range of 2.3–3.7% in sweet potato–wheat flour composite bread. The fat content in the purée was relatively low (0.6%). Therefore, an increase in OFSP purée to wheat flour substitution ratio had an insignificant effect (p > 0.05) on the fat content of bread.
The protein content in the bread ranged from 9.9 g/100 g in 20% OFSP bread to 10.6 g/100 g in white bread. Similar findings in sweet potato flour composite bread have been reported by [26]. On the contrary, the protein content in our study was higher than the results by [50,58]. The protein in sweet potato composite bread slightly increased with an increase in substitution levels, but it was not significant (p > 0.05).
The crude fiber content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in OFSP bread as compared to the white bread. The fiber content of sweet potato composite bread in the current study ranged from 1.2 to 1.8%. This range was higher in comparison to bread formulated by wheat, maize, and sweet potato flours in a study by [24]. The fiber content in our study is however lower compared to a range of 1.8–4.0% reported in wheat flour bread supplemented with green vegetable powders [58]. Similarly, a higher amount of fiber has been reported in wheat–sweet potato flour composite bread [26]. The differences in fiber content are due to varietal and fiber compositional differences among different wheat flour substitutes. Regardless of the slightly lower fiber content in OFSP bread in comparison to other studies, this study reveals OFSP bread as an additional food source for fiber. Consumption of OFSP bread is therefore beneficial as it can provide dietary fiber essential for human health. Dietary fiber increases satiety and promotes gastrointestinal peristalsis, hence alleviating constipation, facilitating weight loss, and lowering cholesterol levels in the blood [59,60].
The ash content is equivalent to the total mineral content in foods. OFSP purée was high in ash, and an increase in supplementation ratio increased the total ash content in bread. The ash content in the present study varied from 1.9% in white bread to 3.2% in 50% sweet potato purée bread. This range is comparable to reported ash contents of 1.4–3.0% and 2.3–3.3% in sweet potato flour composite bread reported by [24,26], respectively. It is however necessary to investigate further specific minerals, such as iron and zinc in sweet potato composite bread.
Available carbohydrate and gross food energy contents in bread ranged from 79.1–80.9% and 407.0–414.5 kcal/100 g, respectively. The carbohydrate content in bread in this study was high compared to other studies [50,58]. A high level of carbohydrate in the form of starch is desirable for gelatinization and bread texture development. The inclusion of sweet potato purée bread in the diet can substantially contribute to the daily energy requirements necessary for metabolic functions.

3.2. Beta-Carotene Content and Retinol Activity Equivalents (RAEs) in OFSP Purée Composite Bread

Table 3 shows β-carotene content and RAEs in sweet potato purée and sweet potato purée bread. β-carotene was undetected in wheat flour bread. Total β-carotene in wheat–OFSP composite bread ranged from 1.9–5.4 mg/100 g. Our results are similar to previously reported study findings by [21,27]. The concentration of β-carotene significantly (p < 0.05) increased with an increase in the proportion of OFSP purée.
A typical HPLC chromatogram of the carotenoids in bread from OFSP variety “VITA” obtained with the YMC C30, 3 µm particle size HPLC column is presented in Figure 1, demonstrating the predominance of β-carotene. The trans- and cis-isomers of β-carotene were detected in OFSP purée bread. More than 70% of the total β-carotene in bread was in trans form, which has more vitamin A activity compared to the cis-isomers. The trans- and cis-β-carotene in bread significantly (p < 0.05) increased with an increase in the percentage of OFSP purée. The concentration of the 13-cis, all-trans and 9-cis β-carotene in sweet potato composite bread ranged from 1410–3950 µg/100 g, 430–1200 µg/100 g, and 70–240 µg/100 g, respectively.
As a rule of thumb, processed foods containing at least 15 µg/g can be considered a good source of vitamin A [27]. In the current study, bread formulated with 30%, 40%, and 50% OFSP purée contained more than 15 µg/g of trans-β-carotene, hence a good source of vitamin A. As expected, OFSP bread contained more of the cis-β-carotene and less of the trans-β-carotene in comparison to fresh OFSP purée. This is in agreement with [15,21]. The baking process induces isomerization of the trans-β-carotene, thereby increasing the concentration of the cis-form in bread.

3.3. Contribution of Vitamin A Daily Requirement to Different Age Groups by OFSP Purée Bread

Retinol Activity Equivalents (RAEs) (Table 3) provided by sweet potato bread from different treatments and their percentage contribution towards vitamin A daily body requirement in different groups is indicated in Table 4.
OFSP bread in this study could provide 138.5–389.1 µg/100 g of RAEs. RAE significantly (p < 0.05) increased with an increase in the ratio OFSP purée and wheat flour. Consumption of 100 g of 30% sweet potato bread could provide about 47% and 32% of vitamin A daily body requirement to adolescents and children below five years, respectively. A similar amount could provide about 25% and 15% of vitamin A RDA to pregnant and lactating women, respectively. OFSP bread (50%) can provide up to 97% of vitamin A daily body requirement to children below the age of five, 65% to adolescents, 51% to pregnant women, and 30% to lactating mothers.

3.4. Color of OFSP Purée Composite Bread

Bread color is an important attribute that influences consumer acceptability. Wheat flour and sweet potato purée blend ratio influenced the color of bread (Table 5). The lightness (L*), redness (a)*, yellowness (b*), chroma, hue angle, and ∆E values of the crumb significantly (p < 0.05) varied from 65.3–77.8, 1.0–11.4, 17.8–40.7, 17.9–42.2, 74.3–86.6, and 11.0–28.1, respectively. L*, a*, b*, chroma, h°, and delta E values for the crust varied from 57.3–69.2, 7.7–13.4, 25.4–35.7, 26.6–38.1, 66.3–73.1, and 9.8–16.7, respectively and were significantly different (p < 0.05). L* and hue angle values for both the crust and crumb significantly decreased with the addition of the purée in bread, while a*, b*, chroma, and ∆E values increased significantly (p < 0.05). A recent study by [3] has also reported similar findings in bread composited with OFSP flour. The partial substitution of wheat flour with sweet potato purée produced redder, yellower, and brighter bread as indicated by the ∆E values. The high ∆E values of sweet potato bread were high, indicating the color changes could easily be perceived without a closer visual inspection in comparison to wheat flour bread. The color change is contributed by β-carotene from the OFSP purée, Maillard browning, and caramelization, which are influenced by the distribution of water and the reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids [35].

3.5. Water Activity of Sweet Potato Purée Bread

Water activity is a significant factor that influences microbial growth in foods [61]. Besides influencing crumb firmness, water activity is a vital storage factor for bread [62]. Water activity (aw) in OFSP purée bread was significantly (p < 0.05) lower as compared to white bread. Water activity in bread from the current study ranged from 0.92–0.93 (Figure 2).
Our study findings were in agreement with water activity range values in bread from previous studies by [31,36]. Water activity slightly decreased in sweet potato bread, but a gradual increase was observed in white bread over the storage period. The authors of [31,62] have reported a reduction in aw in bread formulated with hydrocolloids and OFSP purée, respectively. Though insignificant (p > 0.05), the decline in water activity in sweet potato bread can be attributed to the concentration of natural sugars in the purée due to loss of moisture during storage.

3.6. Microbial Keeping Quality of OFSP Purée Bread

The microbial quality profiles of bread in the study are shown in Figure 3a,b. Microbial counts in sweet potato purée bread were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control sample. TVC, yeast, and molds were absent in freshly baked bread. This shows that the bread was of good quality and safe for consumption. Total counts ranged between 2.17–2.35 log10 cfu/g and 2.82–3.64 log10 cfu/g after 3 and 6 days of storage, respectively.
Yeast and molds cause surface growth, discoloration, and off-flavors in bread [36]. From the findings, there is a tendency of OFSP purée limiting the growth of yeast and molds in wheat–OFSP composite bread. The fungal counts ranged from 1.10–1.49 log10 cfu/g and 1.48–2.16 log10 cfu/g after three and six days of storage, respectively. These counts are low compared to a study by [31] but high compared with findings from other studies [36,63]. Mold growth characterized by black, yellow, and green coloring clusters were observed on white and OFSP bread after 3 and 6 days of storage, respectively. These could potentially have been Aspergillus, Penicillium, Rhizopus, and Mucor species. There was a significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation between water activity and microbial counts in bread. The high microbial counts and fast growth of molds on white bread are attributed to the high water activity. Besides the low water activity, OFSP purée bread has a relatively long shelf life due to the increased moisture retention, hence reducing the rate of staling.

3.7. Correlation of Physical and Nutritional Attributes of Bread

The correlation matrix in Table 6 shows the relationship of different nutritional and the selected physical parameters of bread. A significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation existed between moisture content and ash (r = 0.885), beta-carotene (r = 0.910) and Hunter color values a* (r = 0.886), b* (0.876), chroma (0.881), and ∆E (0.904). On the contrary, a significant (p < 0.01) moderate negative correlation existed between moisture content and carbohydrate (r = −0.75) and water activity (r = −0.630). Sweet potato composite bread higher in moisture content/low dry matter will tend to be high in ash and β-carotene. It is a challenge to simultaneously improve dry matter and beta-carotene among the sweet potato germplasm during biofortification. The positive correlation between β-carotene and total ash suggests an indirect improvement of the latter through selection for higher β-carotene in the variety used for the study [64].
There was a significant (p < 0.01) negative correlation between L* (a measure of lightness) and a*, b*, c*, ∆E, and β-carotene content in bread (r = −0.908, −0.806, −0.898 and −0.926, respectively). The findings illustrate that bread with a high proportion of wheat flour would be expected to be lighter in color due to low amounts of β-carotene. The amount of β-carotene in bread, positively correlated (p < 0.05) with Hunter color values a* (r = 0.979), b* (r = 0.940), c* (r = 0.946) and ∆E (r = 0.924). Similar findings have been reported in a previous study by [21]. The color parameters a* and b* can be useful in predicting the amount of β-carotene in processed products with OFSP as a natural colorant.

3.8. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

The correlation loading and score plots from the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of wheat–OFSP composite bread are shown in Figure 4a,b, respectively. From the findings, the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 98% of the variance in the original data. A large percentage of the variance was explained by PC1 (93.0%), whereas the second PC accounted for 5% of the variance. From Figure 4a, PCA analysis clearly discriminated breads based on their physical and chemical attributes. White bread and 20% sweet potato bread were clustered on side of the PC 1. Breads with purée at 30%, 40%, and 50% were clustered on the positive quadrants of PC1.
As indicated by the correlation plot (Figure 4b), the variation in PC1 was largely characterized by Hunter color values a*, b*, chroma, and ∆E, β-carotene, and moisture content of bread. These components were highly correlated to each other as indicated by their location on the outer ellipse of the correlation loadings. Water activity (aw), total ash, crude fiber also contributed to the variation in PC1. These attributes were prominent in sweet potato purée breads. On the other hand, crude protein and crude fiber were located in the inner circle of the correlation loadings. They, therefore, do not contain enough structured variation to distinguish different bread formulations in the study. The variation in PC2 was contributed by color parameters L* and hue angle (h°). They positively correlated to each other (r = 0.848) and contributed to the PC2 variation that separated white bread from sweet potato purée composite bread.

4. Conclusions

The current study reports the effect of partially substituting wheat flour with OFSP purée on the nutritional, selected physical and microbial quality of sweet potato purée composite bread. An increase in the proportion of OFSP purée as a substitute for wheat flour significantly increased the β-carotene, total ash, and fiber contents of bread. Sweet potato purée also enhanced the color and microbial keeping quality of bread. Consumption of a 100 g portion of 40% and 50% OFSP bread can provide 76% and 97% of vitamin A daily requirement in children below five years. A similar portion of bread formulated with 50% OFSP purée provides half (51%) and 30% of vitamin A daily requirement in pregnant women and lactating mothers, respectively. However, further studies should be considered to determine the dough characteristics, texture properties, and sensory attributes of sweet potato bread.

Author Contributions

D.M. (Derick Malavi): Conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, original draft preparation, review and editing. D.M. (Daniel Mbogo): Review and editing. M.M.: Review and editing. L.M.: Review and editing. J.L.: Funding acquisition, project administration. T.M.: Project administration, conceptualization, supervision, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded under the Sweet Potato Action for Security & Health in Africa (SASHA II Project), OPP1019987, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), and the Roots, Tubers, and Bananas program of the CGIAR.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Azeem, M.; Mu, T.H.; Zhang, M. Influence of particle size distribution of orange-fleshed sweet potato flour on dough rheology and simulated gastrointestinal digestion of sweet potato-wheat bread. LWT 2020, 131, 109690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eriksson, E.; Koch, K.; Tortoe, C.; Akonor, T.P.; Oduro-Yeboah, C. Evaluation of the physical and sensory characteristics of bread produced from three varieties of cassava and wheat composite flours. Food Public Health 2014, 4, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chikpah, S.K.; Korese, J.K.; Hensel, O.; Sturm, B.; Pawelzik, E. Rheological properties of dough and bread quality characteristics as influenced by the proportion of wheat flour substitution with orange-fleshed sweet potato flour and baking conditions. LWT 2021, 147, 111515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, H. Microstructure-modified products from stone-milled wheat bran powder improve glycemic response and sustain colonic fermentation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mbogo, D.; Muzhingi, T.; Janaswamy, S. Starch digestibility and β-carotene bioaccessibility in the orange-fleshed sweet potato puree-wheat bread. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riccardi, G.; Rivellese, A.A.; Giacco, R. Role of glycemic index and glycemic load in the healthy state, in prediabetes, and in diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 269S–274S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qi, G.; Brand, D.; Zheng, S. Role of Vitamin A in the Immune System. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Burri, B.J. Evaluating Sweet Potato as an Intervention Food to Prevent Vitamin A Deficiency. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2011, 10, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Black, R.E.; Victora, C.G.; Walker, S.P.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Christian, P.; de Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Grantham-McGregor, S.; Katz, J.; Martorell, R.; et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013, 382, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van Jaarsveld, P.J.; Faber, M.; Tanumihardjo, S.A.; Nestel, P.; Lombard, C.J.; Benadé, A.J.S. β-carotene-rich orange-fleshed sweet potato improves the vitamin A status of primary school children assessed with the modified-relative-dose-response test. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Low, J.W.; Mwanga, R.O.M.; Andrade, M.; Carey, E.; Ball, A. Tackling vitamin A de fi ciency with bioforti fi ed sweetpotato in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 2017, 14, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. World Health Organization. Global Prevalence of Vitamin A Deficiency in Populations at Risk 1995–2005: WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009; p. 55. Available online: http://apps.who.int//iris/handle/10665/44110 (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  13. Low, J.; Walker, T.; Hijmans, R. The potential impact of orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes on vitamin A intake in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Proceedings of the Presented at Regional Workshop on Food-Based Approaches to Human Nutritional Deficiencies, Nairobi, Kenya, 9–11 May 2001. [Google Scholar]
  14. Araro, T.; Gemechu, F.; Wotango, A.; Esho, T. Chemical Formulation and Characterization of Complementary Foods from Blend of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato, Brown Teff, and Dark Red Kidney Beans. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 2020, 4803839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Islam, S.N.; Nusrat, T.; Begum, P.; Ahsan, M. Carotenoids and β-carotene in orange fleshed sweet potato: A possible solution to Vitamin A deficiency. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Low, J.; Arimond, M.; Labarta, R.; Andrade, M.; Namanda, S. Case study 5 The introduction of orange-fleshed sweet potato in Mozambican diets: A marginal change to make a major difference. In Diversifying Food and Diets; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2013; pp. 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  17. Neela, S.; Fanta, S.W. Review on nutritional composition of orange-fleshed sweet potato and its role in management of vitamin A deficiency. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1920–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sindi, K.; Kirimi, L.; Low, J. Can Biofortified Orange Fleshed Sweetpotato Make Commercially Viable Products and Help in Combatting Vitamin A Deficiency? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the African Associationof Agricultural Economists, Hammamet, Tunisia, 22–25 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tedesco, I.; Stathers, T. Sweetpotato Value Chains in Kenya: A Business Opportunity for Puree Processing and the Potential Role for Commercial Fresh Root Storage; Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich: Kent, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bocher, T.; Low, J.W.; Muoki, P.; Magnaghi, A.; Muzhingi, T. From lab to life: Making storable orange-fleshed sweetpotato purée a commercial reality. Open Agric. 2017, 2, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nzamwita, M.; Duodu, K.G.; Minnaar, A. Stability of β-carotene during baking of orange-fleshed sweet potato-wheat composite bread and estimated contribution to vitamin A requirements. Food Chem. 2017, 228, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bengtsson, A.; Namutebi, A.; Alminger, M.L.; Svanberg, U. Effects of various traditional processing methods on the all-trans-β-carotene content of orange-fleshed sweet potato. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kure, O.A.; Ariahu, C.C.; Igbabul, B.D. Physico-chemical and Sensory Properties of Bread Prepared from Wheat and Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato (Flour, Starch and Non-Starch Residue Flour) Blends. Asian Food Sci. J. 2021, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bibiana, I.; Grace, N.; Julius, A. Quality Evaluation of Composite Bread Produced from Wheat, Maize and Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Flours. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 2, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rangel, C.N.; Salvador, L.; Figueiredo, R.; Watanabe, E. Sensory evaluation of cakes prepared with orange-fleshed sweet potato flour. Perspect. Nutr. Hum. 2011, 13, 203–211. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kidane, G.; Abegaz, K.; Mulugeta, A.; Singh, P. Nutritional analysis of vitamin A enriched bread from orange flesh sweet potato and locally available wheat flours at samre woreda, northern ethiopia. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 1, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Low, J.W.; van Jaarsveld, P.J. The potential contribution of bread buns fortified with β-carotene—Rich sweet potato in Central Mozambique. Food Nutr. Bull. 2008, 29, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wanjuu, C.; Bocher, T.; Abong’, G.; Low, J.; Mbogo, D.; Heck, S.; Muzhingi, T. Consumer Knowledge and Attitude towards Orange-Fleshed Sweetpotato (OFSP) Puree Bread in Kenya. Open Agric. 2019, 4, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Awuni, V.; Alhassan, M.W.; Amagloh, F.K. Orange-fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) composite bread as a significant source of dietary vitamin A. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Owade, J.O.; Muzhingi, T.; Abong, G.O.; Okoth, M.W.; Heck, S.; Low, J.; Mbogo, D.; Malavi, D. Sensory Attributes of Composite Breads from Shelf Storable Orange-Fleshed Sweetpotato Puree. Open Agric. 2018, 3, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wanjuu, C.; Abong, G.; Mbogo, D.; Heck, S.; Low, J.; Muzhingi, T. The physiochemical properties and shelf-life of orange-fleshed sweet potato puree composite bread. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Malavi, D.N.; Muzhingi, T.; Abong, G.O. Good manufacturing practices and microbial contamination sources in orange fleshed sweet potato puree processing plant in Kenya. Int. J. Food Sci. 2018, 2018, 4093161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Musyoka, J.N.; Abong, G.O.; Mbogo, D.M.; Fuchs, R.; Low, J.; Heck, S.; Muzhingi, T. Effects of Acidification and Preservatives on Microbial Growth during Storage of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Puree. Int. J. Food Sci. 2018, 2018, 8410747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pérez-Díaz, I.M.; den Truong, V.; Webber, A.; McFeeters, R.F. Microbial growth and the effects of mild acidification and preservatives in refrigerated sweet potato puree. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lim, H.S.; Park, S.H.; Ghafoor, K.; Hwang, S.Y.; Park, J. Quality and antioxidant properties of bread containing turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) cultivated in South Korea. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1577–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hathorn, C.S.; Biswas, M.A.; Gichuhi, P.N.; Bovell-Benjamin, A.C. Comparison of chemical, physical, micro-structural, and microbial properties of breads supplemented with sweetpotato flour and high-gluten dough enhancers. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lin, L.Y.; Liu, H.M.; Yu, Y.W.; Lin, S.D.; Mau, J.L. Quality and antioxidant property of buckwheat enhanced wheat bread. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bulbula, D.D.; Urga, K. Study on the effect of traditional processing methods on nutritional composition and anti nutritional factors in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Cogent Food Agric. 2018, 4, 1422370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muzhingi, T.; Yeum, K.J.; Russell, R.M.; Johnson, E.J.; Qin, J.; Tang, G. Determination of carotenoids in Yellow Maize, the effects of saponification and food preparations. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2008, 78, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abong, G.O.; Muzhingi, T.; Okoth, M.W.; Ng’Ang’A, F.; Ochieng’, P.E.; Mbogo, D.M.; Malavi, D.; Akhwale, M.; Ghimire, S. Phytochemicals in Leaves and Roots of Selected Kenyan Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato (OFSP) Varieties. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 2020, 3567972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Englberger, L.; Lyons, G.; Foley, W.; Daniells, J.; Aalbersberg, B.; Dolodolotawake, U.; Watoto, C.; Iramu, E.; Taki, B.; Wehi, F.; et al. Carotenoid and riboflavin content of banana cultivars from Makira, Solomon Islands. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Opening Statement by Robert Russell on Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Available online: https://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=s10026 (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  44. Mehany, T.; Zeitoun, M.A. Nutritional, Physicochemical, and Sensorial Evaluation of Flat Bread Supplemented with Quinoa Flour. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 4686727. [Google Scholar]
  45. Siddiq, M.; Nasir, M.; Ravi, R.; Butt, M.S.; Dolan, K.D.; Harte, J.B. Effect of defatted maize germ flour addition on the physical and sensory quality of wheat bread. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baek, S.H.; Kwon, S.Y.; Lee, H.G.; Baek, H.H. Maillard browning reaction of D-psicose as affected by reaction factors. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 17, 1349–1351. [Google Scholar]
  47. Eleazu, C.; Eleazu, K.; Aniedu, C.; Amajor, J.; Ikpeama, A.; Ebenzer, I. Effect of partial replacement of wheat flour with high quality cassava flour on the chemical composition, antioxidant activity, sensory quality, and microbial quality of bread. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 19, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lainez, E.; Vergara, F.; Bárcenas, M.E. Quality and microbial stability of partially baked bread during refrigerated storage. J. Food Eng. 2008, 89, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amandikwa, C.; Iwe, M.O.; Uzomah, A.; Olawuni, A.I. Physico-chemical properties of wheat-yam flour composite bread. Niger. Food J. 2015, 33, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Greene, J.L.; Bovell-Benjamin, A.C. Macroscopic and sensory evaluation of bread supplemented with sweet-potato flour. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, SNQ167–SNQ173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Srivastava, S.; Genitha, T.R.; Yadav, V. Preparation and Quality Evaluation of Flour and Biscuit from Sweet Potato. J. Food Process. Technol. 2012, 3, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Iheagwara, M.C. Isolation, Modification and Characterization of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L (Lam)) Starch. J. Food Process. Technol. 2012, 4, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kotoki, D.; Deka, S.C. Baking loss of bread with special emphasis on increasing water holding capacity. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Pareyt, B.; Finnie, S.M.; Putseys, J.A.; Delcour, J.A. Lipids in bread making: Sources, interactions, and impact on bread quality. J. Cereal Sci. 2011, 54, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chilungo, S.; Muzhingi, T.; Truong, V.; Allen, J.C. Effect of processing and oil type on carotene bioaccessibility in traditional foods prepared with flour and puree from orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2055–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lemmens, L.; Colle, I.; van Buggenhout, S.; Palmero, P.; van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. Carotenoid bioaccessibility in fruit- and vegetable-based food products as affected by product (micro)structural characteristics and the presence of lipids: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 38, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Borel, P.; Pasquier, B.; Armand, M.; Tyssandier, V.; Grolier, P.; Alexandre-Gouabau, M.-C.; Andre, M.; Senft, M.; Peyrot, J.; Jaussan, V.; et al. Processing of vitamin A and E in the human gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2001, 280, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Odunlade, T.V.; Famuwagun, A.A.; Taiwo, K.A.; Gbadamosi, S.O.; Oyedele, D.J.; Adebooye, O.C. Chemical Composition and Quality Characteristics of Wheat Bread Supplemented with Leafy Vegetable Powders. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 9536716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Yang, Y.Y.; Ma, S.; Wang, X.X.; Zheng, X.L. Modification and Application of Dietary Fiber in Foods. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 9340427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hanif, R.; Iqbal, Z.; Iqbal, M.; Hanif, S.; Rasheed, M. Use of vegetables as nutritional food: Role in human health. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2006, 1, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tapia, M.S.; Alzamora, S.M.; Chirife, J. Effects of Water Activity (aw) on Microbial Stability: As a Hurdle in Food Preservation. In Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 239–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lazaridou, A.; Duta, D.; Papageorgiou, M.; Belc, N.; Biliaderis, C.G. Effects of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality parameters in gluten-free formulations. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79, 1033–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ijah, U.J.J.; Auta, H.S.; Aduloju, M.O.; Aransiola, S.A. Microbiological, nutritional, and sensory quality of bread produced from wheat and potato flour blends. Int. J. Food Sci. 2014, 2014, 671701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Tumwegamire, S.; Kapinga, R.; Rubaihayo, P.R.; LaBonte, D.R.; Grüneberg, W.J.; Burgos, G.; Felde, T.Z.; Carpio, R.; Pawelzik, E.; Mwanga, R.O. Evaluation of Dry Matter, Protein, Starch, Sucrose, β-carotene, Iron, Zinc, Calcium, and Magnesium in East African Sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam] Germplasm. HortScience 2011, 46, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram showing beta-carotene peaks in the extract of orange-fleshed sweet potato composite bread at 450 nm. Peak identification: (a) 13-cis β-carotene, (b) all-trans ß-carotene (c) 9-cis β-carotene.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram showing beta-carotene peaks in the extract of orange-fleshed sweet potato composite bread at 450 nm. Peak identification: (a) 13-cis β-carotene, (b) all-trans ß-carotene (c) 9-cis β-carotene.
Foods 11 01051 g001
Figure 2. Water activity profile in bread during storage. The bars indicate standard errors of means. White bread (); 20% OFSP bread (); 30% OFSP bread (); 40% OFSP bread (); 50% OFSP bread ().
Figure 2. Water activity profile in bread during storage. The bars indicate standard errors of means. White bread (); 20% OFSP bread (); 30% OFSP bread (); 40% OFSP bread (); 50% OFSP bread ().
Foods 11 01051 g002
Figure 3. Changes in: (a) total viable counts (TVC); (b) yeast and molds in bread during storage. The bars indicate standard errors of means. White bread (); 20% OFSP bread (); 30% OFSP bread (); 40% OFSP bread (); 50% OFSP bread ().
Figure 3. Changes in: (a) total viable counts (TVC); (b) yeast and molds in bread during storage. The bars indicate standard errors of means. White bread (); 20% OFSP bread (); 30% OFSP bread (); 40% OFSP bread (); 50% OFSP bread ().
Foods 11 01051 g003
Figure 4. (a) Score plots, and (b) correlation loading plots from the principal component analysis of wheat−OFSP purée bread quality attributes.
Figure 4. (a) Score plots, and (b) correlation loading plots from the principal component analysis of wheat−OFSP purée bread quality attributes.
Foods 11 01051 g004
Table 1. Ingredient formulation for wheat flour–OFSP purée composite bread (g/kg).
Table 1. Ingredient formulation for wheat flour–OFSP purée composite bread (g/kg).
Wheat Flour OFSP Purée FatSugar Salt Flour Improver Yeast Water
White bread (0:100)10000253012210666
OFSP bread (20:80)800200252012210361
OFSP bread (30:70)700300252012210315
OFSP bread (40:60)600400252012210200
OFSP bread (50:50)500500252012210100
g denotes weight in grams.
Table 2. Proximate composition of raw ingredients and OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread (DWB) 1.
Table 2. Proximate composition of raw ingredients and OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread (DWB) 1.
Treatment Moisture (%)Crude Fat (%)Crude Protein (%)Crude Fiber (%)Ash (%)Available Carbohydrate (%)Energy (kcal/100 g)
OFSP purée 67.5 ± 0.4 f0.6 ± 0.1 a5.2 ± 0.0 a5.0 ± 0.2 c4.3 ± 0.1 e84.9 ± 1.2 c365.5 ± 4.7 a
Wheat flour 10.4 ± 0.3 a2.3 ± 0.1 b10.2 ± 0.1 b1.4 ± 0.1 a1.8 ± 0.0 a73.9 ± 1.0 a357.1 ± 3.2 a
White bread (0:100)28.6 ± 0.9 b5.4 ± 0.0 c10.6 ± 0.0 b1.2 ± 0.1 a1.9 ± 0.1 a80.9 ± 1.2 b414.5 ± 4.7 b
OFSP bread (20:80)29.1 ± 0.5 b,c5.0 ± 0.0 c9.9 ± 0.2 b1.8 ± 0.0 b2.4 ± 0.0 b80.5 ± 0.8 b406.6 ± 2.5 b
OFSP bread (30:70)30.8 ± 0.7 c,d5.1 ± 0.1 c10.0 ± 0.2 b1.8 ± 0.1 b2.5 ± 0.0 b80.6 ± 1.1 b407.6 ± 5.1 b
OFSP bread (40:60)31.9 ± 0.5 d,e5.4 ± 0.3 c10.4 ± 0.2 b1.7 ± 0.1 b2.8 ± 0.2 c79.6 ± 1.1 b408.7 ± 1.9 b
OFSP bread (50:50)32.7 ± 0.8 e5.5 ± 0.2 c10.4 ± 0.5 b1.8 ± 0.2 b3.2 ± 0.1 d79.1 ± 1.8 b407.0 ± 5.1 b
1 Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Mean values with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). DWB: Nutritional composition except for moisture, is expressed on a dry weight basis.
Table 3. Beta-carotene content (mg/100 g) and Retinol Activity Equivalents (RAE) (µg/100 g) in OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread (DWB) 1.
Table 3. Beta-carotene content (mg/100 g) and Retinol Activity Equivalents (RAE) (µg/100 g) in OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread (DWB) 1.
OFSP Purée: Wheat Flour (%)β-Carotene Crustβ-Carotene Crumb13-cis β-caroteneAll-trans β-Carotene9-cis β-CaroteneTotal β-CaroteneRAE b
White bread (0:100)ndndndndndnd-
OFSP bread (20:80)0.8 ± 0.1 a1.2 ± 0.0 a0.43 ± 0.00 a1.41 ± 0.06 a0.07 ± 0.00 a1.9 ± 0.1 a138.5 ± 7.0 a
OFSP bread (30:70)1.0 ± 0.0 b1.6 ± 0.1 b0.61 ± 0.00 b1.92 ± 0.07 b0.11 ± 0.01 b2.6 ± 0.1 b189.4 ± 4 ± 5.6 b
OFSP bread (40:60)1.5 ± 0.1 c2.7 ± 0.0 c0.94 ± 0.01 c3.07 ± 0.03 c0.19 ± 0.01 c4.2 ± 0.0 c302.8 ± 2.8 c
OFSP bread (50:50)1.7 ± 0.1 d3.7 ± 0.1 d1.20 ± 0.26 d3.95 ± 0.05 d0.24 ± 0.01 d5.4 ± 0.1 d389.1 ± 4.7 d
1 Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and means with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). DWB-nutritional composition is expressed on a dry weight basis, nd—not detected, RAE (Retinol Activity Equivalents) calculated by the conversion factor: 12 µg all-trans β-carotene = 1 µg retinol and 24 µg of cis-β-carotene = 1 µg retinol. Total RAE from each bread sample was obtained by the summation of conversion values by all-trans and cis beta-carotene [42,43].
Table 4. Percentage contribution of vitamin A RDA in different groups by OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread a.
Table 4. Percentage contribution of vitamin A RDA in different groups by OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread a.
OFSP Purée: Wheat Flour (%)Children 4–8 Years (400 b)Adolescents 10–18 Years (600 b)Adult Males 19–65 Years (900 b)Adult Females 19–65 Years (700 b)Pregnant Women (770 b)Lactating Women (1300 b)
White Bread (0:100)0.00.00.00.00.00.0
OFSP Bread (20:80)34.623.115.419.818.010.7
OFSP Bread (30:70)47.431.621.027.124.614.6
OFSP Bread (40:60)75.750.533.643.339.323.3
OFSP Bread (50:50)97.364.943.255.650.529.9
RDA: recommended daily allowances, a Values based on 100 g portion of bread on a dry weight basis, b RDA values adapted from [21,43].
Table 5. Color of OFSP purée and processed OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread 1.
Table 5. Color of OFSP purée and processed OFSP purée–wheat flour composite bread 1.
SampleL*a*b*c* (Chroma)Hue (h°)E
OFSP purée54.3 ± 0.2 a19.1 ± 0.1 g44.1 ± 0.9 g48.1 ± 0.8 g66.6 ± 0.4 a-
White bread—crust69.2 ± 0.2 f7.7 ± 0.2 c,d25.4 ± 0.8 b26.6 ± 0.8 b73.1 ± 0.1 c-
20% OFSP bread—crust62.2 ± 0.2 d11.7 ± 0.2 e31.0 ± 0.8 c33.1 ± 0.8 d69.4 ± 0.5 b9.8 ± 0.6 a
30% bread—crust62.0 ± 0.1 d11.6 ± 0.2 e31.8 ± 0.5 d33.9 ± 0.6 d68.9 ± 0.2 b10.4 ± 0.4 a,b
40% OFSP bread—crust59.3 ± 0.2 c13.4 ± 0.2 f31.7 ± 0.2 d34.2 ± 0.1 d66.9 ± 0.5 a12.9 ± 0.2 c
50% OFSP bread—crust57.3 ± 0.1 b13.4 ± 0.8 f35.7 ± 0.5 e38.1 ± 0.2 e66.3 ± 0.3 a16.7 ± 0.5 d
White bread—crumb77.8 ± 1.1 i1.0 ± 0.1 a17.8 ± 0.4 a17.9 ± 0.6 a86.6 ± 0.3 h-
20% OFSP bread—crumb75.8 ± 0.1 h5.0 ± 0.3 b27.9 ± 0.1 d28.3 ± 0.1 c79.8 ± 0.5 g11.0 ± 0.2 b
30% OFSP bread—crumb74.8 ± 0.3 h7.3 ± 0.2 c36.0 ± 0.2 e36.7 ± 0.5 e78.6 ± 0.2 f19.5 ± 0.4 e
40% OFSP bread—crumb71.5 ± 1.3 g8.4 ± 0.3 d36.2 ± 0.3 e37.1 ± 0.4 e76.9 ± 0.5 e20.8 ± 0.4 f
50% OFSP bread—crumb65.3 ± 0.7 e11.4 ± 0.6 e40.7 ± 0.4 f42.2 ± 0.6 f74.3 ± 0.9 d28.1 ± 0.2 g
1 Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and means with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05). White bread with L0 = 69.2, a0 = 7.73, b0 = 25.4 for the crust and L0 = 77.8, a0 = 1.03, b0 = 17.8 for the crumb were used as standard reference values. ∆E is calculated based on formulae 10.
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients among physical and chemical attributes of bread.
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients among physical and chemical attributes of bread.
Moisture AshFatProteinFiberCarbohydrateβ-CaroteneL*a*b*c*h°Eaw
Moisture1
Ash0.879 **
Fat0.4190.525 *
Protein0.2770.2600.594 *
Fiber−0.454−0.350−0.2080.201
Carbohydrate−0.750 **−0.486−0.622 *−0.696 **−0.091
β-carotene0.910 **0.915 **0.3320.048−0.608 *−0.296
L*−0.845 **−0.939 **−0.384−0.1720.4030.356−0.926 **
a*0.886 **0.879 **0.195−0.035−0.542 *−0.2200.979 **−0.908 **
b*0.876 **0.794 **0.132−0.087−0.595 *−0.1870.940 **−0.806 **0.975 **
c*0.881 **0.806 **0.144−0.077−0.588 *−0.1940.946 **−0.819 **0.980 **1.000 **
h°−0.824 **−0.812 **−0.0770.1790.598 *0.108−0.958 **0.848 **−0.982 **−0.966 **−0.968 **
E0.904 **0.882 **0.646 **0.731 **−0.063−0.597 *0.924 **−0.898 **0.981 **0.985 **0.991 **−0.931 **
aw−0.630 *−0.546 *0.1810.4440.672 **−0.107−0.790 **0.578 *−0.832 **−0.881 **−0.874 **0.913 **−0.732 **1
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malavi, D.; Mbogo, D.; Moyo, M.; Mwaura, L.; Low, J.; Muzhingi, T. Effect of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Purée and Wheat Flour Blends on β-Carotene, Selected Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Bread. Foods 2022, 11, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071051

AMA Style

Malavi D, Mbogo D, Moyo M, Mwaura L, Low J, Muzhingi T. Effect of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Purée and Wheat Flour Blends on β-Carotene, Selected Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Bread. Foods. 2022; 11(7):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malavi, Derick, Daniel Mbogo, Mukani Moyo, Lucy Mwaura, Jan Low, and Tawanda Muzhingi. 2022. "Effect of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Purée and Wheat Flour Blends on β-Carotene, Selected Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Bread" Foods 11, no. 7: 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop