Next Article in Journal
Fast Quantum State Reconstruction via Accelerated Non-Convex Programming
Previous Article in Journal
On the Possibility of Intense Unipolar THz Pulses Formation in Nonhomogeneous Nonequilibrium Nitrogen Plasma Channels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons in Absence of Self-Phase Modulation by Laplace-Adomian Decomposition

1
Applied Mathematics and Systems Department, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Vasco de Quiroga 4871, Mexico City 05348, Mexico
2
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA 71245, USA
3
Mathematical Modeling and Applied Computation (MMAC) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, Pretoria 0204, South Africa
5
Department of Applied Sciences, Cross-Border Faculty of Humanities, Economics and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 111 Domneasca Street, 800201 Galati, Romania
6
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Research Nuclear University, 31 Kashirskoe Hwy, Moscow 115409, Russia
7
Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
8
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(2), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020114
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 8 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 22 January 2023

Abstract

:
This article studies highly dispersive optical solitons without of self-phase modulation effect. The numerical algorithm implemented in this work is Laplace-Adomian decomposition method. Both bright and dark solitons are addressed. The error measure for the adopted scheme is impressively low.

1. Introduction

Optical solitons are fundamental molecules that traverse intercontinental distances with optical fibers. These soliton dynamics have proven to be an engineering marvel for telecommunication industry. Today, the world is completely paralyzed without Internet activity. Therefore, it is the wired global connection with underground and undersea cables that needs to be addressed to boost up performance enhancement. Thus, it is imperative to address soliton dynamics numerically to supplement the reported analytical results from a visual standpoint.
One of the latest concepts that have been introduced during 2019 is highly dispersive (HD) optical solitons [1,2,3,4,5]. It is out of extreme necessity, this concept was conceived. When chromatic dispersion (CD) is negligibly small, it is imperative to supplement it with higher order dispersion terms so that the necessary balance between dispersion and self-phase modulation (SPM) is sustained. Therefore, the additional dispersion effects are from inter-modal dispersion (IMD), third-order dispersion (3OD), fourth-order dispersion (4OD), fifth-order dispersion (5OD) and sixth-order dispersion (6OD). It must be noted that soliton dynamics is studied with monomode fibers while IMD is typically considered in the context of multi-mode fibers. However, to address the problem from a numerical perspective, these technical details of telecommunications industry are overlooked.
The next feature of HD solitons that is going to be addressed is the absence of SPM. If SPM is discarded due to its low count, it should be complemented by additional nonlinear effects in order to preserve the delicate balance between dispersion and nonlinearity required for solitons to persist. This effect comes from self-steepening and nonlinear dispersion terms. The necessary balance thus persists and consequently HD solitons without SPM turns out to be a reality! Thus, the governing model that will be addressed using Laplace-Adomian decomposition method (LADM) is with six linear dispersive effects and three terms that provide the necessary nonlinear effect along with a linear temporal evolution. The LADM analysis is written following a brief introduction to the governing model in this paragraph.

Description of the Governing Model

In the absence of SPM, the dimensionless formulation of the governing nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation (NLSE) with higher order dispersion terms is expressed as follows [1,2]:
i q t + i a 1 q x + a 2 q x x + i a 3 q x x x + a 4 q x x x x + i a 5 q x x x x x + a 6 q x x x x x x + i [ λ ( q 2 q ) x + μ ( q 2 ) x q + σ q 2 q x ] = 0 ,
where q x , t stands for the complex-valued wave profile, where x and t are respectively spatial and temporal variables. The first term signifies linear temporal evolution and i = 1 . Moreover a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 , a 5 and a 6 are coefficients of IMD, GVD, 3OD, 4OD, 5OD and 6OD respectively. Nonlinear terms include the λ coefficient, which represents the influence of self-steepening, and the μ and σ coefficients, which represent the influence of nonlinear dispersions.
It must be noted that the concept of highly dispersive optical solitons is a very theoretical concept that is not yet implemented in any laboratory let alone any manufactured materials. The concept is yet to be implemented and optical fibers with such properties are yet to be manufactured. There are, however, a few issues that naturally arise with such higher order dispersions. These are the shedding of energy and consequently the slowdown of the soliton velocity. This is from the heavy-duty radiation that is formed with such dispersive effects. These effects are therefore ignored and the focus is on the core soliton regime with bound states that arise from the inverse scattering transform.

2. Highly Dispersive Soliton Solutions for the Governing Model (1.1)

The dark highly dispersive optical soliton solution to (1) were recently obtained in [3] using the mathematical technique known as Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion and these in their general form are given by
q ( x , t ) = A tanh ( x ν t ) + B tanh 3 ( x ν t ) × exp { i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) }
where A, B, ν , κ , ω and θ 0 are all real parameters whereas the relationship between some of them is given by
κ = a 5 6 a 6 , a 3 = 4 κ ( a 4 + 10 a 6 κ 2 ) , θ 0 = 3 λ 2 μ ,
and the soliton speed is related to the model parameters by the following equality
ν = a 1 2 a 2 κ 8 a 4 κ 3 96 a 6 κ 5 .
Relatively recently, the bright highly dispersive optical soliton solution to (1) was also achieved in [3] using the same mathematical technique mentioned above and these in their general form are given by
q ( x , t ) = A sech ( x ν t ) + B sech 3 ( x ν t ) × exp { i ( κ x + ω t + θ 0 ) }
where A, B, ν , κ , ω and θ 0 are all real parameters and they are related to the model by means of the relations given by the Equations (3) and (4).
Other research involving highly dispersive solitons using algebraic techniques and special functions are found in [4,5]. In addition, the authors in [6,7] successfully handle the same topic with semi-analytical approaches comparable to our own.

3. Application of Laplace Transform Combined with Adomian Decomposition Method

This section discusses the general approach for numerically treating (1) with provided initial conditions for darks and brights solitons. The method we are going to describe and use is the well-known Adomian decomposition method combined with the Laplace transform (LADM), which was originally established in [8,9].
The standard form of the generalized NLSE equation Equation (1) in an operator form is
D t q ( x , t ) + R q ( x , t ) + N 1 q ( x , t ) + N 2 q ( x , t ) + N 3 q ( x , t ) = 0
with initial condition
q ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) ,
where the operators N 1 q = σ | q | 2 q x , N 2 q = λ ( | q | 2 q ) x and N 3 q = μ q ( | q | 2 ) x symbolize the nonlinear term, respectively. The operational notation R q = a 1 q x i a 2 q x x + a 3 q x x x i a 4 q x x x x + a 5 q x x x x x i a 6 q x x x x x x symbolize the linear differential operator, whereas D t q = q t simply denotes time-dependent derivative.
The technique is based on a series of functions to obtain at the solution q of the problem, which can be written as follows:
q ( x , t ) = n = 0 q n ( x , t )
and the nonlinear term series
N q ( x , t ) = n = 0 A n ( q 0 , , q n ) ,
Each A n is a polynomial called to as an Adomian polynomial. Then the nonlinear terms N 1 q , N 2 q , and N 3 q , can be split into an series of Adomian polynomials provided by:
N 1 q = σ | q | 2 q x = n = 0 P n ( q 0 , q 1 , , q n ) ,
N 2 q = λ ( | q | 2 q ) x = n = 0 Q n ( q 0 , q 1 , , q n ) ,
and
N 3 q = μ q ( | q | 2 ) x = n = 0 R n ( q 0 , q 1 , , q n ) .
P n , Q n , and R n are Adomian polynomials corresponding to the nonlinear terms N 1 , N 2 and N 3 respectively. These can be calculated by the formulas shown in [10], that is,
P n = P 0 = N 1 ( q 0 ) , n = 0 P n = 1 n k = 0 n 1 ( k + 1 ) q k + 1 q 0 P n 1 k , n = 1 , 2 , 3 ,
Q n = Q 0 = N 2 ( q 0 ) , n = 0 Q n = 1 n k = 0 n 1 ( k + 1 ) q k + 1 q 0 Q n 1 k , n = 1 , 2 , 3 ,
R n = R 0 = N 3 ( q 0 ) , n = 0 R n = 1 n k = 0 n 1 ( k + 1 ) q k + 1 q 0 R n 1 k , n = 1 , 2 , 3 ,
Applying these formulas to the expressions given by Equations (10)–(12) we obtain that the first few Adomian polynomials are given by
P 0 = σ q 0 q ¯ 0 q 0 x , P 1 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) , P 2 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) , P 3 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 3 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 3 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 2 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 3 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) , P 4 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 4 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 3 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 4 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 3 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 2 x + q 1 q ¯ 2 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 3 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 2 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 2 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 3 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 3 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 4 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) , Q 0 = λ q 0 2 q ¯ 0 x , Q 1 = λ ( q 0 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 0 x ) , Q 2 = λ ( u 1 2 q ¯ 0 x + q 0 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 0 x ) , Q 3 = λ ( q 1 2 q ¯ 1 x + q 0 2 q ¯ 3 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 0 x + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 0 x ) , Q 4 = λ ( q 2 2 q ¯ 0 x + q 1 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 3 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 4 q ¯ 0 x + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 1 q 3 q ¯ 0 x ) , R 0 = μ q 0 2 q ¯ 0 , R 1 = μ ( 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 0 + q 0 2 q ¯ 1 ) , R 2 = μ ( 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 0 + q 1 2 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 1 + q 0 2 q ¯ 2 ) , R 3 = μ ( 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 1 + q 1 2 q ¯ 1 + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 2 + q 0 2 q ¯ 3 ) , R 4 = μ ( q ¯ 0 q 2 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 0 q 4 + 2 q ¯ 0 q 1 q 3 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 + 2 q 1 q ¯ 1 q 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 2 q 2 + q 1 2 q ¯ 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 + q 0 2 q ¯ 4 ) ,
Accordingly, the Adomian polynomials { A n } n 0 into which the nonlinear part N u = N 1 u + N 2 u + N 3 u is decomposed turn out to be:
A 0 = σ q 0 q ¯ 0 q 0 x + λ q 0 2 q ¯ 0 x + μ q 0 2 q ¯ 0 , A 1 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) + λ ( q 0 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 0 x ) + μ ( 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 0 + q 0 2 q ¯ 1 ) , A 2 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) + λ ( u 1 2 q ¯ 0 x + q 0 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 0 x ) + μ ( 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 0 + q 1 2 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 1 + q 0 2 q ¯ 2 ) , A 3 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 3 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 3 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 2 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 3 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) + λ ( q 1 2 q ¯ 1 x + q 0 2 q ¯ 3 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 0 x + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 0 x ) + μ ( 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 0 + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 1 + q 1 2 q ¯ 1 + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 2 + q 0 2 q ¯ 3 ) , A 4 = σ ( q 0 q ¯ 0 q 4 x + q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 x + q 0 q ¯ 2 q 2 x + q 0 q ¯ 3 q 1 x + q 0 q ¯ 4 q 0 x + q 1 q ¯ 0 q 3 x + q 1 q ¯ 1 q 2 x + q 1 q ¯ 2 q 1 x + q 1 q ¯ 3 q 0 x + q 2 q ¯ 0 q 2 x + q 2 q ¯ 1 q 1 x + q 2 q ¯ 2 q 0 x + q 3 q ¯ 0 q 1 x + q 3 q ¯ 1 q 0 x + q 4 q ¯ 0 q 0 x ) + λ ( q 2 2 q ¯ 0 x + q 1 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 1 q ¯ 3 x + 2 q 0 q 2 q ¯ 2 x + 2 q 0 q 3 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 0 q 4 q ¯ 0 x + 2 q 1 q 2 q ¯ 1 x + 2 q 1 q 3 q ¯ 0 x ) + μ ( q ¯ 0 q 2 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 0 q 4 + 2 q ¯ 0 q 1 q 3 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 + 2 q 1 q ¯ 1 q 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 2 q 2 + q 1 2 q ¯ 2 + 2 q 0 q ¯ 1 q 3 + q 0 2 q ¯ 4 ) ,
so also for additional Adomian polynomials.
When the Laplace transform is applied to both sides of Equation (6), we obtain
L { D t q ( x , t ) + R q ( x , t ) + N 1 q ( x , t ) + N 2 q ( x , t ) + N 3 q ( x , t ) } = 0
and using initial condition, which will be derived from the profiles for highly dispersive solitons and considering that N = N 1 + N 2 + N 3 , we obtian
L { q ( x , t ) } = 1 s f ( x ) 1 s L { R q ( x , t ) } + L { N q ( x , t ) } .
Substituting Equations (8) and (16) into Equation (18), it gives
L { n = 0 q n ( x , t ) } = 1 s f ( x ) 1 s { L { R ( n = 0 q n ( x , t ) ) } + L { n = 0 A n ( q 0 , , q n ) } ) .
Applying the characteristic linearity property of the Laplace transform in Equation (19), we obtain
n = 0 L { q n ( x , t ) } = 1 s f ( x ) 1 s ( n = 0 L { R q n ( x , t ) } + n = 0 L { A n ( q 0 , , q n ) } ) .
Matching both sides of Equation (19), we obtain the Laplace transform of each of the components of the solution, that is
L { q 0 ( x , t ) } = 1 s f ( x )
for every m 1 , the recursive relations are given by
L { q m ( x , t ) } = 1 s L { R q m 1 ( x , t ) } + L { A m 1 ( q 0 , , q m 1 ) } .
Finally, the components q 0 , q 1 , q 2 , ⋯, are then determined recursively by using inverse Laplace transform:
q 0 ( x , t ) = f ( x ) , q m ( x , t ) = L 1 1 s L { R q m 1 ( x , t ) } + 1 s L { A m 1 ( q 0 , , q m 1 ) } , m 1 .
where q 0 is referred to as the zeroth component. An N -components truncated series solution is thus obtained as
S N = i = 0 N q i ( x , t ) .
The series solution (24) may be utilized numerically. For further information on the convergence of the suggested approach, see [11,12].
Numeral examples are given in the next section to demonstrate the suggested method’s algorithm’s high accuracy, ease of implementation, and efficacy.

4. Test Examples

In this section, some examples are provided to show the efficiency and accuracy of the suggested method to find soliton solutions of the NLSE given by Equation (1). The numerical simulation results are carried out by using the Mathematica software.

4.1. Dark Highly Dispersive Optical Soliton

In this subsection, we will simulate highly dispersive dark solitons for a set of values of the coefficients of Equation (1). As an initial condition, we will adopt the general form of such solitons as described in Section 2.
Consider the initial condition derived from Equation (2) in order to develop this type of solitons:
q ( x , 0 ) = A tanh ( x ) + B tanh 3 ( x ) × exp { i ( κ x + θ 0 ) }
We will simulate the three cases using the assumptions listed in Table 1; the generated results are shown graphically in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. In addition, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 show the absolute errors for various points in space-time.

4.2. Bright Highly Dispersive Optical Soliton

In this subsection, we will simulate highly dispersive bright solitons for a set of values of the coefficients of Equation (1). As an initial condition, we will adopt the general form of such solitons as described in Section 2.
Consider now the initial condition derived from Equation (5) in order to develop this type of solitons:
q ( x , 0 ) = A sech ( x ) + B sech 3 ( x ) × exp { i ( κ x + θ 0 ) }
We will simulate the three cases using the assumptions listed in Table 5; the generated results are shown graphically in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. In addition, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8 show the absolute errors for various points in space-time.
An advantage of the model is the guarantee of the sustained balance between CD and SPM although it comes with a cost and those detrimental factors are ignored and, as mentioned earlier, the primary focus of the paper is on the core soliton regime with bound states. The novelty of the physical characteristics is the visualization of these solitons from a numerical perspective. The current model, namely the HD—NLSE not been studied on an oscilloscope, since is a very new model. Therefore the validity of the governing model for the HD solitons is guaranteed thus far with LADM. The visual effects from an oscilloscope are currently awaited.

5. Conclusions

This paper studied bright and dark HD solitons that are governed by NLSE with no SPM. The nonlinearity effects stem from self-steepening and nonlinear dispersions. The integration algorithm was provided by LADM that has portrayed a stunning numerical perspective to HD solitons. The absolute error measure for this numerical study is impressively small. The results are thus going to be of great value to telecommunications industry particularly in the context of fiber-optic dynamics.
This research will be expanded in the future to include birefringent fibers as well as dispersion-flattened fibers that would give an expanded view in the context of differential group delay with HD solitons in absence of SPM. Such investigation is now being conducted, and its findings will be communicated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, O.G.-G.; project administration, L.M.; project administration, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project “DINAMIC”, Contract no. 12PFE/2021.162 The authors are extremely thankful for it.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biswas, A.; Ekici, M.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Belic, M.R. Highly dispersive optical solitons in absence of self-phase modulation by exp-function. Optik 2019, 186, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biswas, A.; Ekici, M.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Alshomrani, A.S. Highly dispersive optical solitons in absence of self-phase modulation by F-expansion. Optik 2019, 187, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biswas, A.; Ekici, M.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Belic, M.R. Highly dispersive optical solitons in absence of self-phase modulation by Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion. Optik 2019, 189, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biswas, A.; Ekici, M.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Belic, M.R. Highly dispersive optical solitons with Kerr law nonlinearity by F-expansion. Optik 2019, 181, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biswas, A.; Vega-Guzman, J.; Mahmood, M.F.; Khan, S.; Ekici, M.; Zhou, Q.; Moshokoa, S.P.; Belic, M.R. Highly dispersive optical solitons with undetermined coefficients. Optik 2019, 182, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. González-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Asma, M.; Alzahrani, A.K. Highly dispersive optical solitons with non-local law of refractive index by Laplace-Adomian decomposition. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Ekici, M.; Khan, S. Highly dispersive optical solitons with quadratic-cubic law of refractive index by the variational iteration method. J. Opt. 2022, 51, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adomian, G.; Rach, R. On the solution of nonlinear differential equations with convolution product nonlinearities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1986, 114, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adomian, G. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method; Kluwer: Boston, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duan, J.-S. Convenient analytic recurrence algorithms for the Adomian polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217, 6337–6348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hosseini, M.M.; Nasabzadeh, H. On the convergence of Adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 182, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Babolian, E.; Biazar, J. On the order of convergence of Adomian method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2002, 130, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Case 1: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 1. Case 1: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g001
Figure 2. Case 2: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 2. Case 2: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g002
Figure 3. Case 3: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 3. Case 3: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated dark soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g003
Figure 4. Case 4: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 4. Case 4: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g004
Figure 5. Case 5: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 5. Case 5: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g005
Figure 6. Case 6: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Figure 6. Case 6: graphic representation: (a) numerically generated bright soliton, (b) 2D density plot.
Photonics 10 00114 g006
Table 1. Equation (1) coefficients for dark highly dispersive optical solitons.
Table 1. Equation (1) coefficients for dark highly dispersive optical solitons.
Cases a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 λ μ σ κ ν N
1 1.20 0.45 3.05 1.06 2.22 1.06 0.05 0.62 0.06 0.34 0.09 16
2 0.50 0.64 0.33 0.02 2.10 2.03 0.02 0.01 0.89 0.17 0.81 16
3 1.55 1.04 0.92 2.22 3.40 2.15 4.02 0.01 0.90 0.26 2.15 16
Table 2. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 1.
Table 2. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 1.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 5.21 × 10 9 3.45 × 10 9 2.09 × 10 9 2.16 × 10 9 3.64 × 10 9 5.02 × 10 9
0.3 6.01 × 10 8 4.32 × 10 8 3.34 × 10 8 3.32 × 10 8 4.14 × 10 8 6.88 × 10 8
0.5 4.02 × 10 7 3.62 × 10 7 1.92 × 10 7 2.02 × 10 7 3.22 × 10 7 5.10 × 10 7
Table 3. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 2.
Table 3. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 2.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 9.01 × 10 9 7.12 × 10 9 6.33 × 10 10 1.02 × 10 9 6.09 × 10 9 8.62 × 10 9
0.3 7.13 × 10 8 3.02 × 10 8 1.11 × 10 8 2.01 × 10 8 3.98 × 10 8 7.08 × 10 8
0.5 2.62 × 10 7 2.88 × 10 7 1.52 × 10 7 1.28 × 10 7 3.01 × 10 7 2.87 × 10 7
Table 4. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 3.
Table 4. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 3.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 6.71 × 10 9 4.45 × 10 9 9.04 × 10 10 9.32 × 10 10 5.16 × 10 9 7.23 × 10 9
0.3 5.59 × 10 8 5.01 × 10 8 2.71 × 10 8 3.09 × 10 8 4.25 × 10 8 8.00 × 10 8
0.5 1.36 × 10 7 1.08 × 10 7 1.01 × 10 7 1.33 × 10 7 2.21 × 10 7 2.07 × 10 7
Table 5. Equation (1) coefficients for bright highly dispersive optical solitons.
Table 5. Equation (1) coefficients for bright highly dispersive optical solitons.
Cases a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 λ μ σ κ ν N
4 0.55 0.15 2.22 3.76 1.05 3.00 0.01 0.90 1.22 0.05 0.53 16
5 0.20 0.94 2.09 1.98 4.20 1.15 3.02 1.04 2.06 0.60 17.87 16
6 2.55 2.00 1.76 2.87 1.22 1.45 0.02 2.36 0.64 0.14 3.18 16
Table 6. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 4.
Table 6. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 4.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 6.43 × 10 9 4.15 × 10 9 2.58 × 10 9 2.09 × 10 9 3.99 × 10 9 5.89 × 10 9
0.3 8.11 × 10 8 5.76 × 10 8 2.88 × 10 8 2.62 × 10 8 4.88 × 10 8 7.79 × 10 8
0.5 6.22 × 10 7 5.02 × 10 7 3.93 × 10 7 3.34 × 10 7 4.85 × 10 7 6.94 × 10 7
Table 7. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 5.
Table 7. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 5.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 8.89 × 10 9 6.27 × 10 9 3.98 × 10 9 3.01 × 10 9 6.08 × 10 9 8.09 × 10 9
0.3 9.53 × 10 8 4.29 × 10 8 4.88 × 10 9 1.07 × 10 8 4.13 × 10 8 8.44 × 10 8
0.5 9.71 × 10 7 5.42 × 10 7 1.93 × 10 7 6.34 × 10 8 3.65 × 10 7 8.04 × 10 7
Table 8. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 6.
Table 8. Absolute error in space-time for 16th iteration of Case 6.
x 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
t
0.1 7.97 × 10 9 6.01 × 10 9 4.03 × 10 9 3.98 × 10 9 6.24 × 10 9 8.00 × 10 9
0.3 8.37 × 10 8 6.19 × 10 8 5.18 × 10 8 5.99 × 10 8 6.43 × 10 8 8.40 × 10 8
0.5 9.11 × 10 7 7.32 × 10 7 3.58 × 10 7 3.81 × 10 7 6.95 × 10 7 8.89 × 10 7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Moraru, L.; Moldovanu, S. Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons in Absence of Self-Phase Modulation by Laplace-Adomian Decomposition. Photonics 2023, 10, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020114

AMA Style

González-Gaxiola O, Biswas A, Moraru L, Moldovanu S. Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons in Absence of Self-Phase Modulation by Laplace-Adomian Decomposition. Photonics. 2023; 10(2):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020114

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Gaxiola, Oswaldo, Anjan Biswas, Luminita Moraru, and Simona Moldovanu. 2023. "Highly Dispersive Optical Solitons in Absence of Self-Phase Modulation by Laplace-Adomian Decomposition" Photonics 10, no. 2: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop