Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Extraction of Polysaccharides from Bletilla ochracea Schltr. Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Evaluating their Antioxidant Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Sieve Unit Inclination Angle in the Cleaning Process of Oat Grain in a Rotary Cleaning Device
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Operation: Enhanced Biohydrogen Production and Enrichment of Hydrogen-producing Acetogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Tamarind Seed Gum on the Qualities of Gluten-Free Cakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Blanching Time on Moisture, Sugars, Protein, and Processing Recovery of Sweet Corn Kernels

by
Mariusz Szymanek
1,*,
Agata Dziwulska-Hunek
2 and
Wojciech Tanaś
1
1
Department of Machine Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Biophysics, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(3), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030340
Submission received: 23 February 2020 / Revised: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 10 March 2020 / Published: 16 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Food Processing Processes)

Abstract

:
The objective of this work is to determine the influence of blanching time on moisture content, sugars, protein, and processing recovery (degree of cut corn) of sweet corn kernels. Sweetcorn cobs of the Jubilee variety were blanched in the water at the temperature 85 °C during the period of 2, 4, 6, and 8 min. Non-blanched cobs were used as control samples. Blanched cobs were made subject to a mechanical process of cutting-off the kernels. It was stated that the blanching time has significant statistical influence on the content of moisture, sugars, and protein in kernel as well as on the quantity of the cut-off kernel mass.

1. Introduction

Sweet corn (Zea mays (L.) var. saccharate) is a cultivated plant for human consumption, and it is a raw or processed material of the food industry throughout the world [1,2].
The process of a mechanical cutting-off the sweetcorn kernel from the cobs for consumer purposes (tinning, freezing) in food processing plants takes place with the help of classical cutting-off devices. Mechanical impact of knives upon the material being cut-off characterized by high moisture; above 70% causes great loss in quantity and quality including valuable nutrients [3]. The loss is generated not only at cutting-off but also as a result of further processing of the kernel (rinsing, blanching) during its contact with water [4]. Blanching is one of the stages of kernel technological production processes for consumer purposes. This process significantly affects the quality of the material [5]. The main purpose of blanching is the inactivation of the tissue enzymes responsible for spoiling the material as well as undesirable changes in its color, taste and texture. However, improper realization of this operation may cause the change of texture, color, the content of nutrients as well as affect the costs of the whole process [6]. Moreover, blanching influences the change of chemical and physical properties [7], not to mention the coagulation of the kernel pulp [8]. Changing the consistency of the grain pulp reduces the leakage of juice, and thus the loss of nutrients [9]. The changes which are created in the blanched material depend on the time duration, temperature, and the method of blanching [9] as well as on the variation, maturity and size of the corn cob [10]. The quality of the kernels also depends on whether the blanched occurs before the cutting process (corn on the cob) or after cutting it off. Boyet et al. [11] state that blanching the kernel on the cob, due to a wider area for blanching, results in deterioration of natural texture and taste of the kernel, whereas Peters and Ramirez [12] present that the blanched kernel before the cutting process contains a greater quantity of dimethyl sulfide than the blanched kernel after the cutting off. Trongpanich et al. [4] observed that blanching the cut-off kernel shows more advantages than blanching the kernel on the cob before the cutting-off process. Higher properties for the yield of kernel, participation of solid bodies and nutrients were observed in the research. However, the authors stated that blanching the kernel on the cob before the cutting-off process results in the decrease of heat input used in the production process of the kernel. Niedziółka et al. [13] reported that blanching of cobs influences not only the quantity of the cut-off kernel but also its quality. In practice, very few operators blanch corn on the cob but blanch cut kernels because of the high energy requirements for ear blanching.
The objective of this work is to determine the influence of blanching time on moisture content, sugars, protein, and processing recovery (degree of cut corn) of sweet corn kernels.

2. Material and Methods

Sweet corn supersweet hybrid (Jubilee) was used in this study. This study was conducted during 2018 and 2019 at the field research of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. The cobs for the research were collected manually during their processing maturity period defined on the basis of moisture and the consistence of the kernel pulp. Due to the fact that the blanching time depends on, among other things, the size of cobs, the research was therefore made on cobs having similar geometrical size.
The characteristics of the tested material are presented in Table 1.
Blanching was carried out in a laboratory, blanching LW-11 (DanLab, PL) with 11 dm3 capacity of water, heated by stainless steel electric resistance elements with a Pt100 probe for temperature control (Lumel RG24, PL).
Ten sweetcorn cobs were placed in a metal basket and immersed in a container with water of 85 °C. The blanching time was: 2, 4, 6, and 8 min. The conditions of blanching were chosen on the basis of the literature [14]. Cobs that did not undergo the blanching process (0) constituted the control set. After taking out the cobs from the container, they were cooled down in a flow of cold water until they reached temperature ca. 50 °C. Then they were dried. Blanching was carried out in three repetitions for each duration of time. Then the blanched cobs were submitted to the process of kernel separation in a cutter made by FMC model 3-AR. The angular speed of the cutter head was 167.5 rad·s−1 and the linear velocity of the cob feeder was 0.31 m·s−1.
The moisture content of the sweet corn kernels sample was determined gravimetrically by oven drying the sample at 103 °C for 72 h until a constant weight was obtained. The result was expressed as percent moisture loss (wet basis). The moisture of corn kernels was determined using the ASAE [15] method. The laboratory dryer KBC G-65/250(PREMED, PL) was used. The samples were allowed to cool in a desiccator, after which the weights were recorded. The weight was measured using a scale WPE 2000p (RADWAG, PL). Three samples were used and the average moisture content was reported.
Measurement of sugar contents was made using the DNS method following acid hydrolysis [16]. The reducing sugars were determined prior to the hydrolysis by means of the DNS method. The starch content was determined through the difference between the total content of sugars and the content of sugars soluble in ethyl alcohol (40% v/v). The sucrose content was established through the difference between the content of sugars soluble in ethyl alcohol and the content of reducing sugars. To determine the reducing sugar content with the DNS method, a test tube was filled with 0.5 cm3 of the tested solution and 1.5 cm3 of 3-5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) and then boiled for 5 min in a bath of boiling water. After cooling down, 6 cm3 of distilled water was added to make a total volume of 8 cm3. Next, the sample extinction was read against a reagent assay at a wavelength of λ = 550 nm. The extinction measurement results were referenced to the model curve. The sugar content was determined in relation to the kernel dry mass. The experiments were replicated thrice in 100-g samples for each variety and the average values were reported.
Protein content of kernel samples from each treatment were dried in an oven (65 °C) until obtaining constant mass. Afterward, total nitrogen was determined for each kernel sample according to [17] and the results expressed as proposed in the Kjeldahl method where protein content is estimated based on total nitrogen content.
The moisture of kernel and the content of sugars and starch were defined on the basis of 100-g samples which were taken at random from the pulp of the cut-off kernel. The end value of a given volume was determined by arithmetic average from three repetitions.
The degree of cutting off the kernel from cob cores was calculated on the basis of a percentage participation of the cut off kernel weight o the corn cob weight.
The statistical analysis of the research results was carried out by a method of a one-factor variance analysis and Tukey’s multiple confidence intervals at an assumed significance level of α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

From Figure 1, we can compare the moisture of the kernel corn from the different time of blanching. Moisture content of sweet corn during blanching varied with the blanching time. Mean values of moisture of the blanched cobs, within the duration of 2 to 8 min, were within the range from 77.4% to 78.6%. In relation to the non-blanched cobs with the moisture 76.7%, there occurred an increase in moisture of the blanched kernel by ca. 0.9% for 2 min, by ca. 1.2% for 4 min, by ca. 2.1% for 6 min, and by ca. 2.5% for 8 min of the blanching time. Tukey’s multiple comparison tests showed, on the other hand, that mean values of moisture were significantly differentiated statistically only between the control (0) and 6 min blanching time and control (0) and 8 min blanching time.
Kachhadiya et al. [18] observed similar relationships while blanching sweet corn kernels. Moisture content significantly increased from 76% to 80.2% in hot water blanching.
Similar occurrences were observed in the research of other authors [19,20]. Kachhadiva et al. [18] reported, on the other hand, that in the case of some products, a significant decrease of moisture occurs only after a long-lasting blanching process, whereas making blanching time longer influences an increase of moisture.
Total sugar content of untreated sweet corn is extremely important and its content depends on variety, harvesting time, and post-harvest practices [21]. The analysis of sugar content in kernel showed a reverse process as for moisture. In relation to the content of sugars in non-blanched kernel (3.73 g), its content decreased to 2.90 g after 2 min, to 2.85 g after 4 min, to 2.82 g after 6 min, and 2.77 g after 8 min of the blanching time (Figure 2).
Tukey’s test showed, however, that mean values of sugars in blanched kernel were indeed only statistically between 2 and 8 min of blanching time. The decrease of the content of sugars in blanched material is proven by the research of other authors [22,23]. However, in the research of Califano and Calvelo [23], blanching was reported to be a process which minimizes the loss of sugars. Dauda [24] indicates that loss of soluble sugars from fresh corn is the major factor that results in staleness of fresh corn. Kachhadiya et al. [18] observed that total sugar significantly decreased from 8.40 to 5.70 g in hot water blanching. These results are in line with finding obtained by Alan et al. [25]. According to Shu [26], a decrease in sugar may be due to the leaching of sugar during blanching.
Mean content of protein in non-blanched kernel was 3.0 g. As the result of blanching, it decreased to 2.96 g after 2 min, to 2.81 g after 4 min, to 2.74 g after 6 min, and 2.71 g after 8 min of the blanching time (Figure 3). Tukey’s test showed that significant statistical differences in decreasing the content of protein occurred only after 6 and 8 min of blanching time.
Approximately a decrease of 7% of the protein content in spinach, which was submitted to ca. 3 min blanching in temperature about 85 °C, was noted by Grzeszczuk et al. [20]. A similar relationship is also shown in the work of other authors [27].
Mean value of the degree of cutting off the kernel mass from non-blanched was 56.26%. Together with making the blanching time longer, a significant statistical increase of cut-off kernel mass was observed. Mean values were 60.36% after 2 min, 70.07% after 4 min, 78.63% after 6 min, and 86.38% after 8 min of blanching (Figure 4).
The analysis of results showed that, similar to the research of Niedziółka et al. [13], blanching influences the increase of quantity of the cut-off kernel. However, this relationship was not stated by Trongpanich et al. [4]. From the course of events presented at Figure 4, it also results in blanching time significantly and statistically influencing the quantity of cut-off kernel mass. The increase of the cut-off kernel mass together with making blanching time longer can explain the change in moisture and consistency of pulp (coagulation). Both these factors cause less loss of the kernel pulp during the kernel cutting.

4. Conclusions

  • Blanching time of sweet corn cobs has significant statistical influence on the content of moisture, sugars, and protein in kernel as well as on the quantity of the cut-off kernel mass.
  • The content of moisture and the degree of cutting-off increased, and sugars (in general) and protein decreased with the duration of time of the blanching process. The biggest mean values were obtained for 8 min blanching time. In relation to non-blanched kernel, the increase of moisture was observed up to ca. 2.%, the decrease of the content of sugars up to ca. 26%, and the content of protein up to ca. 10%, as well as the increase of degree of cutting-off the kernel pulp up to ca. 54%.
  • Blanching is extremely important for further processing sweet corn and extending shelf-life. In this study, various water blanching time were considered. The best blanching treatment for sweet corn based on the content of moisture, sugars, protein moisture content, and the cut-off kernel mass is 8 min.

Author Contributions

M.S., W.T. writing—review and editing, M.S., A.D.-H. conceived and planned the experiments., carried out the experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The University of Life Sciences in Lublin.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. More, P.G.; Thakre, S.M.; Khodke, S.U. Quality assessment of microwave blanched sweet corn kernels. Inter. J. Agr. Eng. 2018, 1, 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vigneault, C.; Goyette, B.; Gariépy, Y.; Cortbaoui, P.; Charles, M.T.; Raghavan, V.G. Effect of ear orientations on hydrocooling performance and quality of sweet corn. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 43, 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  3. Feibert, E.; Shock, F. Supersweet Corn and Sweet Corn Variety Evaluations; Malheur Experiment Station: Ontario, OR, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  4. Trongpanich, K.; Stonsoavapak, S.; Hengsawadi, D.; Lowitoon, N. A Comparative Study on Pretreatment Processes of Canned Whole Kernel Sweet Corn. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2002, 36, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arroqui, C.; Lopez, A.; Esnoz, A.; Virseda, P. Mathematic model of an integrated blancher/cooler. Food Eng. 2003, 59, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mallett, C.P. Tecnologıa de los Alimentos Congelados; AMV Ediciones: Madrid, Spain, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, E.Z.; Scanlon, M.G. Modeling the effect of blanching conditions on the texture of potato strips. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Selman, J. Vitamin retention during blanching of vegetables. Food Chem. 1994, 49, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mukherjee, S.; Chattopadhyay, P.K. Whirling bed blanching of potato cubes and its effects on product quality. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azanza, F.; Juvik, J.A.; Klein, B.P. Relationships between sensory quality attributes and kernel chemical composition of fresh-frozen sweet corn. J. Food Qual. 1994, 17, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boyes, S.; Chevis, P.; Perera, C. Peroxidase Isoforms of corn kernels and corn on the cob: Preparation and Characteristics. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 30, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peters, K.; Ramirez, C. Technology of Fruits and Vegetable Processing; ED-Tech Pres: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Niedziółka, I.; Szymanek, M.; Tanaś, W. Ocena procesu mechanicznego odcinania ziarna od blanszowanych kolb kukurydzy cukrowej. J. Res. Applic. Agric. Eng. 2004, 49, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chobpattana, W. Effect of Cultivars, Maturity and Blanching Time One Quality of Frozen Whole Kernel Sweet Corn. Ph.D.Thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. Moisture measurement-Unground grain and seeds. In ASAE Standards, 43rd ed.; ASAE: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 1996.
  16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10520. Native starch—Determination of Starch Content—Ewers Polarimetric Method; ISO: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  17. International Organization for Standardization. PN-EN ISO 20483. Ziarno Zbóż i Nasiona Roślin Strączkowych—Oznaczanie Zawartości Azotu i Przeliczenie na Zawartość Białka—Metoda Kjeldahla; ISO: Warsaw, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kachhadiya, S.; Kumar, N.; Seth, N. Process kinetics on physico-chemical and peroxidase activity for different blanching methods of sweet corn. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 4823–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Selman, J.D. The blanching process, in Developments in Food Processing, 4th ed.; Thorne, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 205–249. [Google Scholar]
  20. Grzeszczuk, M.; Jadczak, D.; Podsiadło, C. The effect of blanching, freezing and freeze-storage on changes of some chemical compounds content in New Zealand Spinach. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. 2007, 66, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, S.U.; Cha, S.W.; Son, Y.H.; Son, Y.K. Changes of sugar content by different storage duration in sweet corn and super sweet corn. Korean J. Crop. Sci. 1994, 39, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cumming, D.B.; Stark, R.; Sanford, K.A. The effect of an individual quick blanching 228 method on ascorbic acid retention in selected vegetable. J. Food Process. Preserv. 1981, 229, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Califano, A.N.; Calvelo, A. Heat and mass transfer during warm water blanching of potatoes. J. Food Sci. 1983, 48, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dauda, A.O. Blanching and Oven Drying on Quality of Stored Fresh Maize. Int. J. Agr. Innov. Res. 2014, 3, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  25. Alan, O.; Kinaci, G.; Kinaci, E.; Basciftci, Z.B.; Sonmez, K.; Evrenosoglu, Y.; Kutlu, I. Kernel quality of some sweet corn varieties in relation to processing. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobatanicicluj Napoca 2014, 42, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shu, S. Effect of Maturity and Blanching and Blanching on Carbohydydrate Components of Frozen Normal Sweet and Supersweet Corn. Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  27. Aworh, O.C.; Olorunda, A.O.; Akibo, O. Quality attributes of frozen okra as influenced by processing and storage. Interna. J. Food Sci.Techol. 1980, 15, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The influence of the blanching time on kernel moisture including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The influence of the blanching time on kernel moisture including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Processes 08 00340 g001
Figure 2. The influence of the blanching time on sugar content including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The influence of the blanching time on sugar content including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Processes 08 00340 g002
Figure 3. The influence of the blanching time on protein content including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The influence of the blanching time on protein content including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Processes 08 00340 g003
Figure 4. The influence of the blanching time on the degree of cut-off kernel including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The influence of the blanching time on the degree of cut-off kernel including 95% confidence intervals. Means with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Processes 08 00340 g004
Table 1. The characteristics of the tested material.
Table 1. The characteristics of the tested material.
SpecificationMean Value (SD)
Cob weight * (g)334.3 (21.1)
Cob length (cm)23.1 (2.6)
Cob diameter ** (cm)4.8 (0.8)
Number of kernels per row (pcs.)26 (3.2)
Number of kernel rows (pcs.)14.0 (2.4)
* Husked cobs; ** measured at the central part of cob.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szymanek, M.; Dziwulska-Hunek, A.; Tanaś, W. Influence of Blanching Time on Moisture, Sugars, Protein, and Processing Recovery of Sweet Corn Kernels. Processes 2020, 8, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030340

AMA Style

Szymanek M, Dziwulska-Hunek A, Tanaś W. Influence of Blanching Time on Moisture, Sugars, Protein, and Processing Recovery of Sweet Corn Kernels. Processes. 2020; 8(3):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szymanek, Mariusz, Agata Dziwulska-Hunek, and Wojciech Tanaś. 2020. "Influence of Blanching Time on Moisture, Sugars, Protein, and Processing Recovery of Sweet Corn Kernels" Processes 8, no. 3: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop