Next Article in Journal
Adaptation of the International Fitness Scale and Self-Perceived Health-Related Physical Fitness Questionnaire into Turkish
Previous Article in Journal
Gallbladder Stones in Pediatric Age: An Emerging Problem: The Risk of Difficult Cholecystectomy and the Importance of a Preoperative Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: “Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment”

1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan
2
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(9), 1545; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091545
Submission received: 1 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pediatric Orthopaedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment)

1. Main Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancies: Types and Symptoms

Pediatric orthopedic malignancies are extremely rare and require appropriate diagnosis and treatment by a multidisciplinary team [1]. There are two major primary malignant bone tumors in children: osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma [2]. Osteosarcoma is composed of spindle cell neoplasms that produce osteoid [1], and usually occurs in the metaphyses of the long bones in the knee, the proximal humerus, and the proximal femur [3]. Usually, a short history (weeks to months) of a painful or palpable mass precedes the diagnosis of osteosarcoma [4]. Pathological fractures occur in 10–15% of patients [5]. Although localized disease has a five-year survival rate of >80% with combination chemotherapy and complete resection [6], patients with pulmonary metastases at initial presentation have a poor prognosis [6]. Surgery for the primary site is an essential part of the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma [7]. Typically, chemotherapy is administered before and after surgery, using a combination therapy that includes methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin [7]. On the other hand, the second-line therapy options for relapsed or metastatic osteosarcoma remain limited [8,9].
Ewing sarcoma is the second most common primary bone tumor in children and adolescents [6]. The clinical presentation of Ewing sarcoma is often nonspecific, with the most common symptoms being pain, swelling, and general discomfort [10]. Histologically, the tumor is composed of small round cells, and mainly caused by the chromosomal translocation of EWSR1 on chromosome 22; t(11;22)(q24;q12) or t(21;22)(q22;q12) [11,12,13]. The five-year overall survival rates are approximately 70–80% and 20–30% for patients with localized Ewing sarcoma and metastatic disease, respectively [2]. The primary therapy for Ewing sarcoma typically involves a combination treatment with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, alternated with ifosfamide and etoposide, both before and after local therapy [14]. The choice of local therapy for Ewing sarcoma depends on the anatomical site and the feasibility of surgery. When wide resection with negative margin is not possible or will cause serious morbidity, radiotherapy or both surgery and radiotherapy, are considered as an acceptable alternative to local control [15]. For patients with relapsed or metastatic Ewing sarcoma, second-line therapies such as cyclophosphamide + topotecan [16], irinotecan + temozolomide ± vincristine [17,18], or docetaxel + gemcitabine [19] are commonly employed.
Soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 8% of all malignancies in childhood and adolescence [20]. Approximately half of the cases are rhabdomyosarcoma, while the remainder are various entities, including infantile fibrosarcoma, rhabdoid tumor, synovial sarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [20]. Rhabdomyosarcoma is a family of sarcomas with morphological and/or immunophenotypic evidence of skeletal muscle differentiation and comprises embryonal, alveolar, spindle cell/sclerosing, and pleomorphic types. They present with site-specific symptoms, particularly the alveolar type, which is highly aggressive and typically presents as a rapidly growing soft tissue mass, occasionally with symptoms mimicking leukemia (e.g., fatigue, fever, and unexplained weight loss) [21,22]. Embryonal types generally have a favorable prognosis, whereas alveolar types are more aggressive [23]. The treatment for patients is determined by risk-based therapy, typically with a combination of chemotherapy and site-specific surgery and/or radiotherapy [24]. The European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group [25,26] and the North American Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) [27,28] have both made efforts to establish risk-adapted standards of individual care for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma.

2. Advancements in the Treatment of Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancies

Pediatric orthopedic malignancies should be treated by a multidisciplinary team for optimal surgical outcomes and patient care [29]. For most cases, surgical resection of the primary tumor combined with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is required [30,31]. Wide resection with negative margins is the cornerstone of the surgical treatment of the primary tumor [32]. To improve the surgical treatment, novel technologies, such as three-dimensional (3D) printing and augmented reality, offer promising solutions [33]. Patient-specific cutting guides and instruments created using 3D printing technology are valuable, particularly for pelvic bone tumors, aiding in precise resection and reconstruction [34]. These techniques help achieve accurate resection with safe margins and improve oncologic outcomes [34]. Moreover, surface modification techniques for implants coated with silver, iodine, or gentamicin have been used in the orthopedic field and are expected to reduce the infection risk [35,36]. Further research is required to understand their impact on infection prevention and implant durability.
In contrast, systemic therapy remains a challenge for patients with unresectable or metastatic pediatric orthopedic malignancies. The rarity and heterogeneity of the malignancies have hindered advancements in drug development and management [20]. However, recent breakthroughs in diagnostic molecules and targeted therapies for pediatric orthopedic malignancies have led to more accurate diagnoses and the emergence of novel therapeutic targets [30].
In terms of the genomic abnormalities in osteosarcoma, copy number alterations and chromosomal instability are commonly reported [37]. The loss of TP53 and RB1, as well as the amplification of CDK4, are widely recognized as key factors in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma [37]. Additionally, multi-kinase inhibitors have shown applicability in suppressing hyper-activated receptors such as FGFR, VEGFR, and c-KIT [38,39]. Furthermore, some patients with osteosarcoma exhibit a high level of HER-2 protein expression [24]. Trastuzumab deruxtecan was investigated in a phase 2 study for patients with HER2-positive, relapsed, unresectable osteosarcoma; however, only one of nine patients achieved a response by reaching 24 weeks of event-free survival, and the estimated response rate was 11.1% (NCT04616560) [40].
Similarly, the genetic background of Ewing sarcoma can serve as a biomarker for treatment selection and as a target for molecular therapies [37]. Ewing sarcoma has been reported to exhibit copy number alterations or mutations in genes such as STAG2, TP53, and CDKN2A [37,41]. Utilizing various biomarkers, including STAG2 mutation, TP53 mutation status, and baseline circulating tumor DNA burden, the Bone Tumor Committee of the COG aims to stratify standard treatment [37]. This approach aims to reduce the intensity of standard chemotherapy for low-risk patients while incorporating targeted therapies for high-risk patients [37]. Moreover, EWS-FLI1, an oncogenic transcription factor, downregulates intrinsic CDK inhibitors, playing a crucial role in cell cycle regulation [42]. A randomized, open-label, phase 2 study, as part of the CAMPFIRE master protocol, will assess the addition of abemaciclib, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, to the standard treatment with irinotecan + temozolomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma [42].
Surgical treatment for patients with metastases remains controversial. A systematic review of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma suggested that fewer metastases and an achievement of complete metastasectomy were related to better survival after metastasectomy [43]. Moreover, less-invasive local therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, are useful alternatives to metastasectomy [44]. AOST2031 will compare open surgery and minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma to evaluate thoracic event-free survival and determine the superior surgical approach, thereby affecting curative therapy decisions for patients with metastases [45].
Research about the mechanisms of progression of pediatric orthopedic malignancies including proliferation, angiogenesis, migration, invasion, microenvironment, and antitumor immune system activation has progressed [30]. Novel anticancer agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeting agents, have been developed [46]. Various immunotherapies have been developed to treat malignant tumors [47]. Historically, bone and soft tissue sarcomas were the first tumors to be treated with immunotherapy. Coley reported that the injection of inactivated bacteria induced tumor shrinkage and increased survival rates [48]. Recently, the efficacies of various immunotherapies, including dendritic-cell-based immunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell therapy, adoptive T cell therapy, and immune check inhibitors, have been investigated in several clinical trials [49,50,51,52,53]. For instance, a combination therapy with cabozantinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma lacking translocation was reported in a randomized phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04551430) [54]. The trial involved 69 patients receiving the combination and 36 patients receiving cabozantinib alone with a crossover [54]. The combination demonstrated a higher overall disease control rate (80% vs. 42%, cabozantinib with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and cabozantinib alone, respectively), and improved progression-free survival (5.4 vs. 3.8 months, cabozantinib with nivolumab and ipilimumab and cabozantinib alone, respectively) [54]. Although these studies have proven treatment efficacy in a limited number of patients, further research on the therapeutic targets and mechanisms of pediatric orthopedic malignancy progression may improve immunotherapy outcomes.

3. Conclusions

Pediatric orthopedic malignancies are rare and require a correct diagnosis and multimodal treatment. In this Special Issue “Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment”, we will focus on the latest clinical/basic studies and the development of technologies to improve the surgical treatment of pediatric orthopedic malignancies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, H.A., S.M., H.M. and H.K.; project administration, H.A., S.M., H.M. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salom, M.; Chiari, C.; Alessandri, J.M.G.; Willegger, M.; Windhager, R.; Sanpera, I. Diagnosis and staging of malignant bone tumours in children: What is due and what is new? J. Child. Orthop. 2021, 15, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Larsson, S.E.; Lorentzon, R. The incidence of malignant primary bone tumours in relation to age, sex and site. A study of osteogenic sarcoma, chondrosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma diagnosed in Sweden from 1958 to 1968. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1974, 56b, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ritter, J.; Bielack, S.S. Osteosarcoma. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21 (Suppl. 7), vii320–vii325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Klein, M.J.; Siegal, G.P. Osteosarcoma: Anatomic and histologic variants. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2006, 125, 555–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jaffe, N.; Spears, R.; Eftekhari, F.; Robertson, R.; Cangir, A.; Takaue, Y.; Carrasco, H.; Wallace, S.; Ayala, A.; Raymond, K.; et al. Pathologic fracture in osteosarcoma. Impact of chemotherapy on primary tumor and survival. Cancer 1987, 59, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jackson, T.M.; Bittman, M.; Granowetter, L. Pediatric Malignant Bone Tumors: A Review and Update on Current Challenges, and Emerging Drug Targets. Curr. Probl. Pediatr. Adolesc. Health Care 2016, 46, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marulanda, G.A.; Henderson, E.R.; Johnson, D.A.; Letson, G.D.; Cheong, D. Orthopedic surgery options for the treatment of primary osteosarcoma. Cancer Control 2008, 15, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goorin, A.M.; Harris, M.B.; Bernstein, M.; Ferguson, W.; Devidas, M.; Siegal, G.P.; Gebhardt, M.C.; Schwartz, C.L.; Link, M.; Grier, H.E. Phase II/III trial of etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide in newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: A pediatric oncology group trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Davis, L.E.; Bolejack, V.; Ryan, C.W.; Ganjoo, K.N.; Loggers, E.T.; Chawla, S.; Agulnik, M.; Livingston, M.B.; Reed, D.; Keedy, V.; et al. Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Osteosarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1424–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turaga, S.M.; Sardiu, M.E.; Vishwakarma, V.; Mitra, A.; Bantis, L.E.; Madan, R.; Merchant, M.L.; Klein, J.B.; Samuel, G.; Godwin, A.K. Identification of small extracellular vesicle protein biomarkers for pediatric Ewing Sarcoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1138594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Llombart-Bosch, A.; Machado, I.; Navarro, S.; Bertoni, F.; Bacchini, P.; Alberghini, M.; Karzeladze, A.; Savelov, N.; Petrov, S.; Alvarado-Cabrero, I.; et al. Histological heterogeneity of Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET: An immunohistochemical analysis of 415 genetically confirmed cases with clinical support. Virchows Arch. 2009, 455, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. May, W.A.; Gishizky, M.L.; Lessnick, S.L.; Lunsford, L.B.; Lewis, B.C.; Delattre, O.; Zucman, J.; Thomas, G.; Denny, C.T. Ewing sarcoma 11;22 translocation produces a chimeric transcription factor that requires the DNA-binding domain encoded by FLI1 for transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 5752–5756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed.; World Health Organization: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  14. Womer, R.B.; West, D.C.; Krailo, M.D.; Dickman, P.S.; Pawel, B.R.; Grier, H.E.; Marcus, K.; Sailer, S.; Healey, J.H.; Dormans, J.P.; et al. Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 4148–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. DuBois, S.G.; Krailo, M.D.; Gebhardt, M.C.; Donaldson, S.S.; Marcus, K.J.; Dormans, J.; Shamberger, R.C.; Sailer, S.; Nicholas, R.W.; Healey, J.H.; et al. Comparative evaluation of local control strategies in localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 2015, 121, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bernstein, M.L.; Devidas, M.; Lafreniere, D.; Souid, A.K.; Meyers, P.A.; Gebhardt, M.; Stine, K.; Nicholas, R.; Perlman, E.J.; Dubowy, R.; et al. Intensive therapy with growth factor support for patients with Ewing tumor metastatic at diagnosis: Pediatric Oncology Group/Children’s Cancer Group Phase II Study 9457—A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wagner, L.M.; Perentesis, J.P.; Reid, J.M.; Ames, M.M.; Safgren, S.L.; Nelson, M.D., Jr.; Ingle, A.M.; Blaney, S.M.; Adamson, P.C. Phase I trial of two schedules of vincristine, oral irinotecan, and temozolomide (VOIT) for children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: A Children’s Oncology Group phase I consortium study. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2010, 54, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wagner, L.M.; McAllister, N.; Goldsby, R.E.; Rausen, A.R.; McNall-Knapp, R.Y.; McCarville, M.B.; Albritton, K. Temozolomide and intravenous irinotecan for treatment of advanced Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2007, 48, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Navid, F.; Willert, J.R.; McCarville, M.B.; Furman, W.; Watkins, A.; Roberts, W.; Daw, N.C. Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma. Cancer 2008, 113, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferrari, A.; Brennan, B.; Casanova, M.; Corradini, N.; Berlanga, P.; Schoot, R.A.; Ramirez-Villar, G.L.; Safwat, A.; Guillen Burrieza, G.; Dall’Igna, P.; et al. Pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Standard of Care and Treatment Recommendations from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). Cancer Manag. Res. 2022, 14, 2885–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oberlin, O.; Rey, A.; Lyden, E.; Bisogno, G.; Stevens, M.C.; Meyer, W.H.; Carli, M.; Anderson, J.R. Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: Results of a pooled analysis from United States and European cooperative groups. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 2384–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Malempati, S.; Hawkins, D.S. Rhabdomyosarcoma: Review of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee experience and rationale for current COG studies. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2012, 59, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Skapek, S.X.; Ferrari, A.; Gupta, A.A.; Lupo, P.J.; Butler, E.; Shipley, J.; Barr, F.G.; Hawkins, D.S. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rogers, T.N.; Dasgupta, R. Management of Rhabdomyosarcoma in Pediatric Patients. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 30, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bisogno, G.; Jenney, M.; Bergeron, C.; Gallego Melcón, S.; Ferrari, A.; Oberlin, O.; Carli, M.; Stevens, M.; Kelsey, A.; De Paoli, A.; et al. Addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (EpSSG RMS 2005): A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bisogno, G.; De Salvo, G.L.; Bergeron, C.; Gallego Melcón, S.; Merks, J.H.; Kelsey, A.; Martelli, H.; Minard-Colin, V.; Orbach, D.; Glosli, H.; et al. Vinorelbine and continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide as maintenance chemotherapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS 2005): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1566–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lager, J.J.; Lyden, E.R.; Anderson, J.R.; Pappo, A.S.; Meyer, W.H.; Breitfeld, P.P. Pooled analysis of phase II window studies in children with contemporary high-risk metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 3415–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hawkins, D.S.; Chi, Y.Y.; Anderson, J.R.; Tian, J.; Arndt, C.A.S.; Bomgaars, L.; Donaldson, S.S.; Hayes-Jordan, A.; Mascarenhas, L.; McCarville, M.B.; et al. Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2770–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blakely, A.M.; McPhillips, J.; Miner, T.J. Surgical palliation for malignant disease requiring locoregional control. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2015, 4, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  30. Grünewald, T.G.; Alonso, M.; Avnet, S.; Banito, A.; Burdach, S.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Di Pompo, G.; Distel, M.; Dorado-Garcia, H.; Garcia-Castro, J.; et al. Sarcoma treatment in the era of molecular medicine. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e11131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, Y.B.; Shin, K.H.; Seong, J.; Roh, J.K.; Kim, G.E.; Hahn, S.B.; Suh, C.O. Clinical significance of margin status in postoperative radiotherapy for extremity and truncal soft-tissue sarcoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008, 70, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Patrikidou, A.; Domont, J.; Cioffi, A.; Le Cesne, A. Treating soft tissue sarcomas with adjuvant chemotherapy. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2011, 12, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bläsius, F.; Delbrück, H.; Hildebrand, F.; Hofmann, U.K. Surgical Treatment of Bone Sarcoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Aiba, H.; Spazzoli, B.; Tsukamoto, S.; Mavrogenis, A.F.; Hermann, T.; Kimura, H.; Murakami, H.; Donati, D.M.; Errani, C. Current Concepts in the Resection of Bone Tumors Using a Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printed Cutting Guide. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 3859–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shirai, T.; Tsuchiya, H.; Terauchi, R.; Tsuchida, S.; Shimomura, S.; Kajino, Y.; Takahashi, K. Iodine-supported implants in prevention and treatment of surgical site infections for compromised hosts: A prospective study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023, 18, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schoder, S.; Lafuente, M.; Alt, V. Silver-coated versus uncoated locking plates in subjects with fractures of the distal tibia: A randomized, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center non-inferiority study. Trials 2022, 23, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reed, D.R.; Grohar, P.; Rubin, E.; Binitie, O.; Krailo, M.; Davis, J.; DuBois, S.G.; Janeway, K.A. Children’s Oncology Group’s 2023 blueprint for research: Bone tumors. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2023, 70 (Suppl. 6), e30583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Italiano, A.; Mir, O.; Mathoulin-Pelissier, S.; Penel, N.; Piperno-Neumann, S.; Bompas, E.; Chevreau, C.; Duffaud, F.; Entz-Werlé, N.; Saada, E.; et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Higuchi, T.; Igarashi, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Hayashi, K.; Kimura, H.; Miwa, S.; Bouvet, M.; Tsuchiya, H.; Hoffman, R.M. Multikinase-Inhibitor Screening in Drug-resistant Osteosarcoma Patient-derived Orthotopic Xenograft Mouse Models Identifies the Clinical Potential of Regorafenib. Cancer Genomics Proteom. 2021, 18, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reed, D.R.; Janeway, K.A.; Minard, C.G.; Hall, D.; Crompton, B.D.; Lazar, A.J.; Wang, W.-L.; Voss, S.D.; Militano, O.; Gorlick, R.G.; et al. PEPN1924, a phase 2 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a, T-DXd) in adolescents and young adults with recurrent HER2+ osteosarcoma: A children’s oncology group pediatric early-phase clinical Trial Network study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. 16), 11527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tirode, F.; Surdez, D.; Ma, X.; Parker, M.; Le Deley, M.C.; Bahrami, A.; Zhang, Z.; Lapouble, E.; Grossetête-Lalami, S.; Rusch, M.; et al. Genomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma defines an aggressive subtype with co-association of STAG2 and TP53 mutations. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1342–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rubio-San-Simón, A.; Ogawa, C.; Juan-Ribelles, A.; Knoderer, H.; Lewin, J.H. A randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating abemaciclib in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide in participants with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. 16), TPS11580. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stamenovic, D.; Hohenberger, P.; Roessner, E. Pulmonary metastasectomy in soft tissue sarcomas: A systematic review. J. Thorac. Dis. 2021, 13, 2649–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nakamura, T.; Asanuma, K.; Takao, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Koike, H.; Chen-Yoshikawa, T.F.; Tsukushi, S.; Kuroda, H.; Kozawa, E.; Sano, M.; et al. Clinical Outcome in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients with Lung Metastasis Who Received Metastasectomy and/or Radiofrequency Ablation: Tokai Musculoskeletal Oncology Consortium Study. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 8473–8480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Doski, J.J. An in-progress COG phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing open vs thoracoscopic management of pulmonary metastases in patients with osteosarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. 16), TPS11579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Miwa, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Hayashi, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Igarashi, K.; Tsuchiya, H. Therapeutic Targets for Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: Understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coley, W.B., II. Contribution to the Knowledge of Sarcoma. Ann. Surg. 1891, 14, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miwa, S.; Nishida, H.; Tanzawa, Y.; Takeuchi, A.; Hayashi, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Mizukoshi, E.; Nakamoto, Y.; Kaneko, S.; Tsuchiya, H. Phase 1/2 study of immunotherapy with dendritic cells pulsed with autologous tumor lysate in patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 2017, 123, 1576–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hlavackova, E.; Pilatova, K.; Cerna, D.; Selingerova, I.; Mudry, P.; Mazanek, P.; Fedorova, L.; Merhautova, J.; Jureckova, L.; Semerad, L.; et al. Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Advanced Sarcoma and Neuroblastoma Pediatric Patients: Anti-cancer Treatment Preceding Monocyte Harvest Impairs the Immunostimulatory and Antigen-Presenting Behavior of DCs and Manufacturing Process Outcome. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmed, N.; Brawley, V.S.; Hegde, M.; Robertson, C.; Ghazi, A.; Gerken, C.; Liu, E.; Dakhova, O.; Ashoori, A.; Corder, A.; et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for the Immunotherapy of HER2-Positive Sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. D’Angelo, S.P.; Melchiori, L.; Merchant, M.S.; Bernstein, D.; Glod, J.; Kaplan, R.; Grupp, S.; Tap, W.D.; Chagin, K.; Binder, G.K.; et al. Antitumor Activity Associated with Prolonged Persistence of Adoptively Transferred NY-ESO-1 (c259)T Cells in Synovial Sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 944–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kelly, C.M.; Antonescu, C.R.; Bowler, T.; Munhoz, R.; Chi, P.; Dickson, M.A.; Gounder, M.M.; Keohan, M.L.; Movva, S.; Dholakia, R.; et al. Objective Response Rate Among Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma Treated with Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination with Pembrolizumab: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Eulo, V.; Toeniskoetter, J.; Ruff, T.; Luo, J.; Kemp, L.; Tellez, C.M.; Weiss, M.C.; Hirbe, A.C.; Meyer, C.F.; Elias, A.D.; et al. Randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition versus cabozantinib in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41 (Suppl. 17), LBA11504. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s), not of the MDPI and/or editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aiba, H.; Miwa, S.; Murakami, H.; Kimura, H. Special Issue: “Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment”. Children 2023, 10, 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091545

AMA Style

Aiba H, Miwa S, Murakami H, Kimura H. Special Issue: “Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment”. Children. 2023; 10(9):1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aiba, Hisaki, Shinji Miwa, Hideki Murakami, and Hiroaki Kimura. 2023. "Special Issue: “Pediatric Orthopedic Malignancy: Types, Symptoms, and Treatment”" Children 10, no. 9: 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop