Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Exercise-Based Interventions on Fluid Overload Symptoms in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Grade Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies for Future Therapeutic Intervention
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/biomedicines10051110
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhaled Corticosteroids Selectively Alter the Microbiome and Host Transcriptome in the Small Airways of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

by
William Yip
1,2,3,†,
Xuan Li
1,†,
Graeme J. Koelwyn
1,4,
Stephen Milne
1,3,
Fernando Sergio Leitao Filho
1,
Chen Xi Yang
1,
Ana I. Hernández Cordero
1,
Julia Yang
1,3,
Cheng Wei Tony Yang
1,3,
Tawimas Shaipanich
1,3,
Stephan F. van Eeden
1,3,
Janice M. Leung
1,3,
Stephen Lam
1,3,5,
Kelly M. McNagny
1,2 and
Don D. Sin
1,3,*
1
Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, The University of British Columbia, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
2
School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculties of Medicine and Applied Sciences, The University of British Columbia, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
3
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
4
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
5
British Columbia Cancer Agency, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(5), 1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051110
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 6 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbiology in Human Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are commonly treated with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist combination therapy. While previous studies have investigated the host–microbiome interactions in COPD, the effects of specific steroid formulations on this complex cross-talk remain obscure. Methods: We collected and evaluated data from the Study to Investigate the Differential Effects of Inhaled Symbicort and Advair on Lung Microbiota (DISARM), a randomized controlled trial. Bronchoscopy was performed on COPD patients before and after treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone, formoterol/budesonide or formoterol-only. Bronchial brush samples were processed for microbial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and host mRNA sequencing. Longitudinal changes in the microbiome at a community, phylum and genus level were correlated with changes in host gene expression using a Spearman’s rank correlation test. Findings: In COPD patients treated with salmeterol/fluticasone, the expression levels of 676 host genes were significantly correlated to changes in the alpha diversity of the small airways. At a genus level, the expression levels of 122 host genes were significantly related to changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus. Gene enrichment analyses revealed the enrichment of pathways and biological processes related to innate and adaptive immunity and inflammation. None of these changes were evident in patients treated with formoterol/budesonide or formoterol alone. Interpretation: Changes in the microbiome following salmeterol/fluticasone treatment are related to alterations in the host transcriptome in the small airways of patients with COPD. These data may provide insights into why some COPD patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids may be at an increased risk for airway infection, including pneumonia. Funding: The Canadian Institute of Health Research, the British Columbia Lung Association, and an investigator-initiated grant from AstraZeneca.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ß2-agonists (LABA) are commonly prescribed medications for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [1]. Compared with LABA monotherapy, combination therapy with ICS/LABA has been shown to improve health status and lung function and reduce the risk of acute exacerbations [1]. However, several studies have shown that COPD patients treated with ICS and, in particular, inhaled fluticasone are at an increased risk of pneumonia [2,3]. While not fully settled, the risk of pneumonia in this setting may in part relate to the steroid formulation and potency, with lipophilic and potent steroids enhancing the risk [2,4,5,6].
The risk of pneumonia may also relate to the airway microbiome, which is perturbed in COPD. We have recently shown that ICS/LABA use is associated with a relative reduction in alpha diversity of the small airway microbiome in COPD [7]. Here, we hypothesized that ICS therapy is associated with changes in the airway microbiome that are related to host transcriptomic changes in the small airway microenvironment. We also hypothesized that these changes are steroid-specific based on potency and lipophilicity. To investigate these hypotheses, we applied bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and host mRNA-sequencing to bronchial brushes to obtain profiles of the small airway microbiome and host transcriptome from COPD patients treated with different ICS/LABA combinations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort and Design

We used data from the Study to Investigate the Differential Effects of Inhaled Symbicort and Advair on Lung Microbiota (DISARM), which was a randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effects of inhaled fluticasone and budesonide on the airway microbiome of patients with COPD. The DISARM trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02833480 and has approval from the University of British Columbia/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Committee (H14-02277). The patient cohort and overall study design of the DISARM trial have been previously described in detail and are also shown in Figure 1 [7].
Briefly, a total of 89 COPD patients who were clinically stable for at least 8 weeks and did not receive prior treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics were enrolled in the study. After providing informed consent, all participants underwent a 4-week run-in period during which they discontinued ICS (if they were on them) and received only formoterol (Oxeze Turbuhaler® 12 ug twice daily) as a maintenance therapy to wash out any residual effects of ICS in the lower airways. At the end of the 4-week run-in period, participants underwent a baseline bronchoscopy where bronchial brushes were obtained from the 6th to 8th generation airways of the right upper lobe (or left upper lobe if the right upper lobe was not accessible) using a steel-tipped cytology brush. Following the baseline bronchoscopy, 63 participants were randomly assigned to three treatment groups for 12 weeks: salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU; Advair Diskus® 250 ug twice daily; n = 22), formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD; Symbicort Turbuhaler® 400 ug twice daily; n = 20) and formoterol-only (FOR; Oxeze Turbuhaler® 12 ug twice daily; n = 21). The FOR group was considered the control group. At the end of the 12-week treatment period, participants underwent a follow-up bronchoscopy where bronchial brushes were obtained from the same airway as where the first bronchoscopic sampling took place.

2.2. Microbial DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Bronchial brushings for microbiome profiling were collected and stored in Cytolyt (Hologic, Marlborough, MA, USA) for DNA preservation as previously described [7]. Methods for microbial DNA extraction and PCR amplification have been described in detail previously [7]. DNA was extracted from cytological brush specimens using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Toronto, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extraction was followed by PCR amplification using primers targeting the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Purified PCR products were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3. Microbiome Profiling

Methods for profiling the microbiome have been described in detail previously [7]. In brief, raw sequencing reads (fastq files) were processed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2, version 2020.2) [8]. The divisive amplicon denoising algorithm (DADA2) was used to denoise and cluster the sequencing reads into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and merge the paired-end reads [9]. A Naïve Bayes taxonomic classifier was trained on the SILVA rRNA database (v132, Ref NR 99) and used for taxonomic assignment [10,11]. Low abundant taxa and ASVs with no taxa annotation at a phylum level were omitted from the downstream analysis.

2.4. Host RNA Extraction and RNA Sequencing

Bronchial brushings for host transcriptomic profiling were collected and stored in QIAzol RNA lysis buffer (QIAGEN, Stockach, Germany) to preserve RNA prior to extraction. RNA was extracted from cytological brush specimens using the RNeasy Plus kit (QIAGEN, Stockach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced at the Biomedical Research Centre Sequencing Core at the University of British Columbia. Sample quality control was performed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Qualifying samples were then prepared following the standard protocol for the NEBnext Ultra ii Stranded mRNA (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). mRNA Sequencing was subsequently performed on the Illumina NextSeq500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) platform with paired end 42 bp × 42 bp reads, as previously described [12].

2.5. Host Transcriptomic Profiling

Raw sequencing reads were analyzed for quality control using FastQC [13]. Salmon was used for quantification and quasi-alignment of the sequencing reads to the GENCODE genome reference (assembly GRCh37, release 31) [14,15]. Transcript level counts and transcripts per million (TPM) were summarized to gene level using the “tximport” R package, and gene level counts were filtered using the “filterByExpr” function in the “edgeR” package [16,17]. The R package “limma” was used to normalize the count data to log2 counts per million (CPM) [18,19]. After genes with low abundance (log2CPM < 1 or TPM < 2 in more than 80% of the samples) were filtered out, a total of 15,667 genes remained.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Longitudinal changes in the microbiome as well as the expression levels of individual genes were quantified as post- minus pre-treatment. Only participants (n = 53) with both pre- and post-treatment gene expression data as well as microbiome data were included in the current study. From these participants, we independently correlated changes in gene expression (∆log2CPM) in each treatment group with changes in alpha diversity (Shannon diversity index) [20], beta diversity (Unweighted UniFrac Distance Matrix) [21] and relative abundances of the main taxa (at the phylum and genus levels) using Spearman’s rank correlations. Statistical significance was set at a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 0.1. From the significantly correlated genes, the ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, USA) was used to identify top canonical pathways, enriched biological pathways and diseases, and upstream transcription, cytokine and transmembrane receptor regulators. To further validate the enriched pathways identified by IPA, we performed pathway enrichment analyses using the package WebGestaltR [22] in R (version 4.0.5) [23] on the same set of genes using gene ontology (GO) terms and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways [24,25].

3. Results

3.1. Study Cohort

Fifty-three participants had both pre-and post-treatment gene expression data as well as microbiome data (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. No significant differences according to demographics, lung function and clinical data were detected across the three treatment groups (p > 0.05).

3.2. Changes in Alpha Diversity of the Airway Microbiome Are Related to Changes in Host Gene Expression in the Small Airways

To investigate the host–microbiome relationship in the small airways of COPD patients treated with FOR/BUD or SAL/FLU, we compared the change (post- minus pre- treatment) in the microbiome at a community, phylum, and genus level with changes in host gene expression.
Using a Spearman’s rank correlation, we related changes in alpha diversity using the Shannon index as a summary indicator with changes in host gene expression in each of the three treatment groups. Of the 15,667 genes analyzed, we noted changes in the expression levels of 676 genes (500 negative and 176 positive) in COPD patients treated with SAL/FLU and these correlated significantly (FDR < 0.1) with changes in the Shannon index (Figure 2). At a more stringent threshold of FDR < 0.05, 180 genes remained significantly correlated with changes in the Shannon index in the SAL/FLU group. Of the 676 genes significantly correlated with changes in the Shannon Index, the majority were hematopoietic and inflammatory cell-linked, followed by mesenchymal/stromal- and epithelial-linked genes. Interestingly, out of the 15,667 genes analyzed, no genes were related to changes in the Shannon index in the FOR/BUD or FOR treatment group. In all three treatment groups, changes in beta diversity did not correlate significantly with changes in host gene expression (data not shown).

3.3. Changes in Host Gene Expression Are Related to Phylum Level Changes in the Small Airway Microbiome

Next, we investigated the relationship between changes in the relative abundance of airway microbes at a phylum level and changes in genes expressed by cells in the small airway microenvironment. We independently correlated the changes in the relative abundance of phylum groups with the changes in host gene expression in each of the treatment groups. Of the 18 phyla detected in the microbiome samples, the most abundant were Firmicutes (mean relative abundance 39.8%) followed by Bacteroidetes (24.3%), Proteobacteria (20.7%), Actinobacteria (10.3%), and Fusobacteria (2.45%), comprising approximately 98% of the sequencing reads. The changes in the relative abundance of these top five most abundant phyla were correlated with changes in host gene expression. Statistically significant (FDR < 0.1) genes are shown in Figure S1. The SAL/FLU treatment group had the highest number of genes showing a correlation with relative abundance data at the phylum level: Firmicutes (IGFBP3), Bacteroidetes (LPAR6), Actinobacteria (KLRC1), and Fusobacteria (14 genes). In the FOR/BUD treatment group, only DONSON was significantly correlated with the change in the relative abundance of Fusobacteria. Lastly, in the FOR treatment group, GGA3, WDR92, EIF3J-DT, ADAM28 and SPATA5L1 were correlated with the change in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes.

3.4. Changes in Host Gene Expression Are Related to Genus Level Changes in the Small Airway Microbiome

We investigated the relationship between microbes at a genus level and host cells in the small airway following ICS/LABA treatment. We independently related changes in the relative abundance of airway microbes at a genus level with changes in host gene expression in each of the three treatment groups. Of the detected genera, the five most abundant were Streptococcus (mean relative abundance 19.8%) followed by Prevotella 7 (13.3%), Veillonella (12.6%), Haemophilus (7.7%), and Rothia (3.8%), comprising approximately 59% of the sequencing reads. The changes in the relative abundance of these five genera were related to changes in the host gene expression. Statistically significant (FDR < 0.1) genes are shown in Figure S2. We identified 122 genes, primarily hematopoietic and inflammatory genes, that were significantly correlated with changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in the SAL/FLU treatment group (Figure 3). Of the 122 genes identified, 113 genes were negatively correlated, and nine genes were positively correlated. In addition, the change in the relative abundance of Streptococcus was correlated with the change in the expression of FBXL6, FHAD1, SLC25A21-AS1, AC093495.1 and ZNF704 in the SAL/FLU treatment group. Conversely, only ZNF236-DT from the FOR treatment group was correlated with the change in the relative abundance of Rothia, and no genes showed any significant correlation in the FOR/BUD treatment group.

3.5. Salmeterol/Fluticasone Treatment Is Associated with Enriched Biological Pathways in the Small Airways

Next, we explored the functional role of the significantly correlated genes to gain insights into how they may be involved in the complex interactions between the small airway microbiome and host cells in the small airway microenvironment. We first performed enrichment analysis using IPA followed by validation with GO terms and KEGG pathways. Of the previous analyses that generated gene lists, only resulting gene lists that were larger than 20 significant genes were evaluated for pathway enrichment. From the 676 genes, which were significantly related to changes in the Shannon Index in the SAL/FLU treatment group, we identified 176 canonical pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched. The top 50 canonical pathways are shown in Figure 4a. Interestingly, these included pathways involving innate and adaptive immunity, extracellular and intracellular signaling, cell adhesion, chemotaxis and migration of immune cells, cellular cytoskeletal reorganization, and metabolic and biochemical processes. In addition, we identified significantly (p < 0.05) enriched biological functions and cellular processes related to cellular movement, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cell death and survival, cellular morphology, and inflammation (Figure 4b). To further identify factors potentially involved in regulating the 676 significantly correlated genes, we performed upstream regulator analysis using IPA, which predicts potential upstream regulators, including transcription factors, cytokines, and transmembrane receptors demonstrated experimentally to alter the affected gene pathways (Figure S3a). The top five upstream cytokine regulators included IFNG, CSF2, IL13, IL17A, and IL10. Top five upstream transcription and transmembrane receptor regulators included CEBPA, SMARCA4, RELA, ECSIT, STAT3 and TREM1, TLR2, CD40, TLR7, TNFRSF18, respectively. Subsequent additional pathway enrichment analyses using GO revealed 141 biological processes that were significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched. The top 50 GO pathways with the greatest percentage of overlapping genes, which, similar to IPA, showed primarily immunological processes, are shown in Figure S4a. From the KEGG enrichment analysis, we identified 44 pathways that were significantly enriched (Figure S4b). Similar to the GO pathways identified, immune pathways and biological processes related to the activation of the innate and adaptive immune response were primarily enriched followed by pathways related to infectious diseases (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus infection).
From the 122 genes that were related to the changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in the SAL/FLU treatment group, we identified 94 canonical pathways that were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched, the majority of which were pathways related to innate and adaptive immunity. The top 50 canonical pathways are shown in Figure 5a. Biological functions and cellular processes enriched from the 122 genes are shown in Figure 5b. Upstream cytokine, transcription and transmembrane receptor regulators are shown in Figure S3b. The top five upstream cytokine regulators included IFNG, IL13, IL10, CSF2 and IL17A. Top five upstream transcription and transmembrane receptor regulators included STAT1, CEBPA, STAB1, STAT3, CEBPB and TLR2, CD69, CD14, TNFRSF10A, CD40, respectively. Pathway enrichment analyses using GO revealed 45 biological processes that were significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched, the majority of which were pathways related to innate and adaptive immunity. These included macrophage activation, T cell activation, cell chemotaxis, interleukin-12 production, granulocyte activation, neutrophil-mediated immunity, and antigen processing and presentation (Figure S5a). From the KEGG enrichment analysis, we identified eight pathways at FDR < 0.05, and the top 10 pathways are shown in Figure S5b.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the complex relationship between the airway microbiome and host transcriptome of small airways in COPD patients treated with ICS using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Previous large RCTs have shown that inhaled fluticasone-based therapy increases the risk of pneumonia by ~75% (compared with LABA alone or placebo) in patients with COPD [26]. On the other hand, the use of budesonide, especially in low doses, has not been associated with pneumonia in COPD [27]. Moreover, there is growing evidence that dysbiosis (and, in particular, a reduction in microbial diversity) is a significant contributor to the occurrence of severe pneumonia [28]. While previous studies have investigated the relationship between the lung microbiome and host transcriptome in COPD [29,30,31], the effects of specific steroid formulations on this complex cross-talk have not been adequately explored. To address this knowledge gap, our study compared the effects of SAL/FLU and FOR/BUD on the changes in the microbiome and host transcriptome in the small airways of patients with COPD. Here, we show that in COPD patients treated with SAL/FLU, the host gene expression levels in the small airways are significantly related to longitudinal changes in their microbiome at a community, phylum and genus level. Specifically, longitudinal changes in the alpha diversity and the relative abundance of Haemophilus were primarily associated with changes in the expression levels of genes commonly found in hematopoietic and inflammatory immune cells among patients treated with SAL/FLU. Furthermore, changes in alpha diversity were also associated with expression level changes in certain epithelial and mesenchymal/stromal cell genes. Similar trends were not observed in the FOR/BUD or FOR treatment group, suggesting that these observations are steroid-specific and may be, in part, related to the more potent and lipophilic nature of fluticasone compared to budesonide [6].
There is a growing body of evidence that suggests ICS can alter the airway microbiome in COPD patients, but cellular responses in the host that are related to airway dysbiosis are poorly understood. Our findings support the notion that ICS therapy is tightly linked to alterations in gene expression and microbiome changes in the small airway microenvironment. Consistent with our observations, several studies have demonstrated an association between the lung microbiome and host gene transcriptome in COPD lung tissue [29], sputum [30] and bronchial brushings [31]. In lung tissue, we have previously demonstrated an association between the Shannon Index and host gene expression, which is consistent with our current findings [29]. Among the major genera analyzed in the present study, Haemophilus was the most strongly associated with changes in genes related to the innate and adaptive immune response in COPD patients, and this finding was identified exclusively in the SAL/FLU group. This is consistent with the findings by Wang and colleagues, who demonstrated in sputum samples an association between Haemophilus and the host immune transcriptome during both clinical stability as well as during COPD exacerbations [30]. In contrast, our findings are slightly different from those reported by Ramsheh and colleagues [31]. These authors found that Prevotella and Moraxella were associated with expression level changes in genes involved in immunity and inflammation in COPD patients treated with ICS. However, this study was not an RCT, and there was no run-in period wherein ICS was discontinued before obtaining bronchial brush samples. In addition, they did not analyze the effects of specific steroid formulations, which could influence the microbial composition and/or transcriptomic patterns. Nonetheless, our study extends their findings by exploring the effects of different ICS formulations and using RCT methodology.
Our findings support the view that ICS use, particularly fluticasone, is associated with changes in both the microbiome as well as the transcriptome of hematopoietic and immune cells in the small airways. However, whether changes in the airway microbiome precede host gene expression changes or are a consequence of altered gene expression related to ICS use cannot be concluded from the findings of this study. Our findings likely represent one of three possible scenarios. With regards to the first scenario, ICS may directly alter the airway microbiome, which then may have indirect effects on gene expression changes in cells in the local airway microenvironment. Whether ICS can directly interact with bacteria via ligand–receptor interactions in the airway microbiome has not yet been explored; however, it has been reported that bacteria possess receptors for, and respond to, several mammalian hormones [32]. In addition, androgens and glucocorticoids have been shown to impact microbial growth by affecting the rate of doubling of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [32]. Although the supporting evidence is not conclusive, it is reasonable to hypothesize that ICS directly alters the airway microbiome, leading to dysbiosis. Indirect effects on host hematopoietic immune cells may then be facilitated by signals provided by the dysbiotic microbiome in the form of bacterial metabolites. More recently, it has been shown that metabolically active microbes within the small airway microbiome are capable of producing immunomodulatory metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [33]. The role of SCFAs in modulating the systemic immune response in various chronic inflammatory lung diseases has been studied extensively [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. SCFAs produced by the small airway microbiome may modulate the local immune response by similar mechanisms as gut-derived SCFAs. As receptors for SCFAs are abundantly expressed on both immune cells [40,41] and epithelial cells [42], gene expression change as a consequence of ICS-driven microbial dysbiosis in COPD is certainly a possibility. Second, contrary to the previous scenario, ICS may directly interact with steroid receptors expressed in cells in the local surrounding airway, particularly immune cells, which may have downstream transcriptomic effects on inflammatory genes that lead to indirect changes to the resident microbiota. Consistent with this notion, a previous study has shown that ICS treatment induces microbial dysbiosis in the airways by suppressing cathelicidin produced by the airway epithelium [43]; however, our data did not demonstrate an association between changes in the microbiome and changes in the genes associated with cathelicidin. Nonetheless, the broad suppression of the immune response by corticosteroids may allow for certain pathogenic strains of bacteria to colonize the airway resulting in microbial dysbiosis [44]. Finally, while our study suggests that changes in the microbiome are related to changes in the hematopoietic compartment of the small airways or vice versa, these two variables may be affected by ICS independently and simultaneously. The effects of ICS on the host–microbiome relationship are complex and will require future studies to clarify the directionality of this cross-talk.
There were several important limitations to the current study. First, the sample size was relatively small. This was in part due to challenges in (1) performing two bronchoscopy procedures per subject and (2) discontinuing ICS during the run-in phase for some patients. Second, we recruited clinically stable patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. As such, the findings from this study cannot be extended to patients with milder diseases and may not be applicable to those who experience acute exacerbations. Third, the findings reported in this study are relational and do not demonstrate causality or directionality. Lastly, our study did not investigate the proteome, metabolome or epigenome of the small airway because it was beyond the purview of the original RCT. Applying a multi-omics approach would allow for a deeper comprehensive analysis of the small airway environment, which may provide clarity on the mechanistic effects of ICS on the host–microbiome interaction in the context of ICS-driven pneumonia in COPD.
In summary, our data indicate that transcriptomic changes in (chiefly immune) cells in the small airway microenvironment are related to changes in the airway microbiome, specifically the alpha diversity and relative abundance of the Haemophilus genus, in COPD patients treated with salmeterol/fluticasone. Our findings provide insights into the dynamic host–microbiome relationship that may be important in identifying COPD patients who may be at increased risk of pneumonia.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10051110/s1.

Author Contributions

Data acquisition: D.D.S., J.M.L., S.F.v.E., T.S. and S.L.; sample processing: F.S.L.F., J.Y. and C.W.T.Y.; data analysis and interpretations: W.Y., X.L., G.J.K., S.M., F.S.L.F., C.X.Y., A.I.H.C., K.M.M. and D.D.S.; drafting of manuscript: W.Y. and X.L.; critical revision of draft manuscripts: W.Y., X.L., G.J.K., S.M., A.I.H.C., F.S.L.F., C.X.Y., J.Y., C.W.T.Y., T.S., S.F.v.E., J.M.L., S.L., K.M.M. and D.D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research, the British Columbia Lung Association, and an investigator-initiated grant from AstraZeneca®. W. Yip is supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada Graduate Scholarship and a MITACS Accelerate Fellowship. S. Milne is supported by the MITACS Accelerate Program. A.I. Hernández Cordero is supported by MITACS, the Providence Airway Centre, the St. Paul’s Foundation, and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research trainee award. J.M. Leung is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Translational Airway Biology and a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research-Health Professional-Investigator Award. D.D. Sin is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in COPD and holds the de Lazzari Family Chair at the Centre for Heart Lung Innovation. The funding sources of this study did not contribute in any capacity to the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of British Columbia Providence Health Care (H14-02277).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Microbiome sequencing data used in this study can be found publicly on the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject number PRJNA685554. Gene expression data from all participants in this study can be found publicly on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ (accession number GSE162120).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ryan Vander Werff and Tara Stach at BRC-Seq (The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) for conducting the RNA sequencing. The authors thank Chung Cheung, Hyun Lee, Cassidy Clements and Charles Lau for their comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Singh, D.; Agusti, A.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Bourbeau, J.; Celli, B.R.; Criner, G.J.; Frith, P.; Halpin, D.M.; Han, M.; et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: The GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Suissa, S.; Patenaude, V.; Lapi, F.; Ernst, P. Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD and the risk of serious pneumonia. Thorax 2013, 68, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Crim, C.; Calverley, P.M.; Anderson, J.A.; Celli, B.; Ferguson, G.T.; Jenkins, C.; Jones, P.W.; Willits, L.R.; Yates, J.C.; Vestbo, J. Pneumonia risk in COPD patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination: TORCH study results. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 34, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Suissa, S.; Dell’Aniello, S.; Ernst, P. Comparing initial LABA-ICS inhalers in COPD: Real-world effectiveness and safety. Respir. Med. 2021, 189, 106645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, M.; Du, Y.; Chen, H.; Jiang, D.; Xu, Z. Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 77, 105950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Janson, C.; Stratelis, G.; Miller-Larsson, A.; Harrison, T.W.; Larsson, K. Scientific rationale for the possible inhaled corticosteroid intraclass difference in the risk of pneumonia in COPD. Int. J. COPD 2017, 12, 3055–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leitao Filho, F.S.; Takiguchi, H.; Akata, K.; Ra, S.W.; Moon, J.Y.; Kim, H.K.; Cho, Y.; Yamasaki, K.; Milne, S.; Yang, J.; et al. Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroid/long-acting beta-2 Agonist Combination on the Airway Microbiome of Patients with COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DISARM). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 204, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S.P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2639–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Milne, S.; Li, X.; Yang, C.X.; Leitao Filho, F.S.; Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.W.; Shaipanich, T.; Van Eeden, S.F.; Leung, J.M.; Lam, S.; et al. Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate sars-cov-2-related genes in copd: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Andrews, S.; Bioinformatics Babraham Institute. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  14. Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Frankish, A.; Diekhans, M.; Ferreira, A.M.; Johnson, R.; Jungreis, I.; Loveland, J.; Mudge, J.M.; Sisu, C.; Wright, J.; Armstrong, J.; et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D766–D773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Soneson, C.; Love, M.I.; Robinson, M.D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: Transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 2015, 4, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2009, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.I.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Law, C.W.; Chen, Y.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. Voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Konopiński, M.K. Shannon diversity index: A call to replace the original Shannon’s formula with unbiased estimator in the population genetics studies. PeerJ 2020, 8, E9391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lozupone, C.; Lladser, M.E.; Knights, D.; Stombaugh, J.; Knight, R. UniFrac: An effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011, 5, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liao, Y.; Wang, J.; Jaehnig, E.J.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, B. WebGestalt 2019: Gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W199–W205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Team, R.C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2013. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  24. Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Oncology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kew, K.M.; Seniukovich, A. Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, 1465–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sin, D.D.; Tashkin, D.; Zhang, X.; Radner, F.; Sjöbring, U.; Thorén, A.; Calverley, P.M.; Rennard, S.I. Budesonide and the risk of pneumonia: A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2009, 374, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roquilly, A.; Torres, A.; Villadangos, J.A.; Netea, M.G.; Dickson, R.; Becher, B.; Asehnoune, K. Pathophysiological role of respiratory dysbiosis in hospital-acquired pneumonia. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sze, M.A.; Dimitriu, P.A.; Suzuki, M.; McDonough, J.E.; Campbell, J.D.; Brothers, J.F.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Hayashi, S.; Elliott, W.M.; et al. Host response to the lung microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 192, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, Z.; Maschera, B.; Lea, S.; Kolsum, U.; Michalovich, D.; Van Horn, S.; Traini, C.; Brown, J.R.; Hessel, E.M.; Singh, D. Airway host-microbiome interactions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Res. 2019, 20, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ramsheh, M.Y.; Haldar, K.; Esteve-Codina, A.; Purser, L.F.; Richardson, M.; Müller-Quernheim, J.; Greulich, T.; Nowinski, A.; Barta, I.; Stendardo, M.; et al. Lung microbiome composition and bronchial epithelial gene expression in patients with COPD versus healthy individuals: A bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and host transcriptomic analysis. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2, e300–e310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Plotkin, B.J.; Roose, R.J.; Erikson, Q.; Viselli, S.M. Effect of Androgens and Glucocorticoids on Microbial Growth and Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Curr. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sulaiman, I.; Wu, B.G.; Li, Y.; Tsay, J.C.; Sauthoff, M.; Scott, A.S.; Ji, K.; Koralov, S.B.; Weiden, M.; Clemente, J.C.; et al. Functional lower airways genomic profiling of the microbiome to capture active microbial metabolism. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, 2003434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Van der Hee, B.; Wells, J.M. Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-chain Fatty Acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jang, Y.O.; Kim, O.H.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Yun, S.; Lim, S.E.; Yoo, H.J.; Shin, Y.; Lee, S.W. High-fiber diets attenuate emphysema development via modulation of gut microbiota and metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jang, Y.O.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, J.J.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, J.M.; Kang, M.J.; Oh, Y.M.; Park, Y.J.; Shin, Y.; Lee, S.W. Fecal microbial transplantation and a high fiber diet attenuates emphysema development by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, N.; Dai, Z.; Wang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Pu, J.; Cao, W.; Pan, T.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.; et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Res. 2021, 22, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ghorbani, P.; Santhakumar, P.; Hu, Q.; Djiadeu, P.; Wolever, T.M.; Palaniyar, N.; Grasemann, H. Short-chain fatty acids affect cystic fibrosis airway inflammation and bacterial growth. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Cait, A.; Hughes, M.R.; Antignano, F.; Cait, J.; Dimitriu, P.A.; Maas, K.R.; Reynolds, L.A.; Hacker, L.; Mohr, J.; Finlay, B.B.; et al. Microbiome-driven allergic lung inflammation is ameliorated by short-chain fatty acids. Mucosal. Immunol. 2018, 11, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yip, W.; Hughes, M.R.; Li, Y.; Cait, A.; Hirst, M.; Mohn, W.W.; McNagny, K.M. Butyrate Shapes Immune Cell Fate and Function in Allergic Asthma. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; González, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Imoto, Y.; Kato, A.; Takabayashi, T.; Sakashita, M.; Norton, J.E.; Suh, L.A.; Carter, R.G.; Weibman, A.R.; Hulse, K.E.; Stevens, W.; et al. Short-chain fatty acids induce tissue plasminogen activator in airway epithelial cells via GPR41&43. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 544–554. [Google Scholar]
  43. Singanayagam, A.; Glanville, N.; Cuthbertson, L.; Bartlett, N.W.; Finney, L.J.; Turek, E.; Bakhsoliani, E.; Calderazzo, M.A.; Trujillo-Torralbo, M.B.; Footitt, J.; et al. Inhaled corticosteroid suppression of cathelicidin drives dysbiosis and bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaav3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 10 01110 g001 550
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Biomedicines 10 01110 g001
Biomedicines 10 01110 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in gene expression in the small airways are related to changes in the microbiome at a community level. (a) Heat map depicting significant (FDR < 0.1) correlations between changes (post- minus pre-treatment) in host cell gene expression (delta log2 counts per million (∆log2CPM)) and changes in the Shannon diversity index (∆Shannon) in at least one of the three treatment groups: formoterol-only (FOR), formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU). Colour represents Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Columns represent individual genes and are arranged using hierarchical clustering. (b) Scatterplots of select genes that are negatively correlated. (c) Scatterplots of select genes that are positively correlated. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 2. Changes in gene expression in the small airways are related to changes in the microbiome at a community level. (a) Heat map depicting significant (FDR < 0.1) correlations between changes (post- minus pre-treatment) in host cell gene expression (delta log2 counts per million (∆log2CPM)) and changes in the Shannon diversity index (∆Shannon) in at least one of the three treatment groups: formoterol-only (FOR), formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU). Colour represents Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Columns represent individual genes and are arranged using hierarchical clustering. (b) Scatterplots of select genes that are negatively correlated. (c) Scatterplots of select genes that are positively correlated. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate.
Biomedicines 10 01110 g002
Biomedicines 10 01110 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes in gene expression in the small airways are related to changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus. (a) Heat map depicting significant correlations between changes (post-minus pre-treatment) in host cell gene expression (delta log2 counts per million (∆log2CPM)) and changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in at least one of the three treatment groups: formoterol-only (FOR), formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU). Colour represents Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Rows represent individual genes. ** represents an FDR < 0.05. * represents an FDR < 0.1. (b) Scatterplots of select genes that are negatively correlated. (c) Scatterplots of select genes that are positively correlated. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 3. Changes in gene expression in the small airways are related to changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus. (a) Heat map depicting significant correlations between changes (post-minus pre-treatment) in host cell gene expression (delta log2 counts per million (∆log2CPM)) and changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in at least one of the three treatment groups: formoterol-only (FOR), formoterol/budesonide (FOR/BUD) or salmeterol/fluticasone (SAL/FLU). Colour represents Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Rows represent individual genes. ** represents an FDR < 0.05. * represents an FDR < 0.1. (b) Scatterplots of select genes that are negatively correlated. (c) Scatterplots of select genes that are positively correlated. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate.
Biomedicines 10 01110 g003
Biomedicines 10 01110 g004 550
Figure 4. Ingenuity pathway analysis of the 676 host cell genes significantly correlated (FDR < 0.1) with changes in the Shannon diversity index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with salmeterol/fluticasone. (a) Top 50 canonical pathways of genes significantly correlated to changes in the Shannon diversity index. (b) Enriched biological functions, cellular processes and diseases. The number in the parentheses represents genes from our 676 gene dataset that overlap with genes that appear in the enriched biological function, cellular process or disease.
Figure 4. Ingenuity pathway analysis of the 676 host cell genes significantly correlated (FDR < 0.1) with changes in the Shannon diversity index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with salmeterol/fluticasone. (a) Top 50 canonical pathways of genes significantly correlated to changes in the Shannon diversity index. (b) Enriched biological functions, cellular processes and diseases. The number in the parentheses represents genes from our 676 gene dataset that overlap with genes that appear in the enriched biological function, cellular process or disease.
Biomedicines 10 01110 g004
Biomedicines 10 01110 g005 550
Figure 5. Ingenuity pathway analysis of the 122 host cell genes significantly correlated (FDR < 0.1) with changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with salmeterol/fluticasone. (a) Top 50 canonical pathways of genes significantly correlated to changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus. (b) Enriched biological functions, cellular processes and diseases. The number in the parentheses represents genes from our 122 gene dataset that overlap with genes that appear in the enriched biological function, cellular process or disease.
Figure 5. Ingenuity pathway analysis of the 122 host cell genes significantly correlated (FDR < 0.1) with changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with salmeterol/fluticasone. (a) Top 50 canonical pathways of genes significantly correlated to changes in the relative abundance of Haemophilus. (b) Enriched biological functions, cellular processes and diseases. The number in the parentheses represents genes from our 122 gene dataset that overlap with genes that appear in the enriched biological function, cellular process or disease.
Biomedicines 10 01110 g005
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants included in the study (n = 53). Table shows the median and interquartile range for quantitative variables. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; Post-BD FEV1, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants included in the study (n = 53). Table shows the median and interquartile range for quantitative variables. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; Post-BD FEV1, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids.
VariablesFOR
n = 19		FOR/BUD
n = 16		SAL/FLU
n = 18
Age, years63.0 (56.0–67.0)66.0 (62.5–70.3)66.0 (60.3–72.8)
Male, n (%)18 (94.7%)14 (87.5%)14 (77.8%)
BMI, kg/m224.4 (22.0–31.3)23.9 (19.4–28.5)28.0 (23.2–32.6)
Current smokers, n (%)10 (52.6%)6 (37.5%)10 (55.6%)
Smoking exposure, pack years45.0 (22.0–60.0)51.5 (43.3–58.5)48.0 (34.5–59.0)
Post-BD FEV1, % of predicted66.3 (50.0–73.5)58.0 (48.1–70.5)61.5 (47.9–86.5)
Post-BD FEV1/FVC, %56.1 (49.6–62.7)49.0 (44.6–59.2)63.1 (49.9–66.7)
Hypertension, n (%)4 (21.1%)5 (31.3%)3 (18.8%)
ICS at enrollment, n (%)12 (63.2%)7 (43.8%)10 (62.5%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yip, W.; Li, X.; Koelwyn, G.J.; Milne, S.; Leitao Filho, F.S.; Yang, C.X.; Hernández Cordero, A.I.; Yang, J.; Yang, C.W.T.; Shaipanich, T.; et al. Inhaled Corticosteroids Selectively Alter the Microbiome and Host Transcriptome in the Small Airways of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051110

AMA Style

Yip W, Li X, Koelwyn GJ, Milne S, Leitao Filho FS, Yang CX, Hernández Cordero AI, Yang J, Yang CWT, Shaipanich T, et al. Inhaled Corticosteroids Selectively Alter the Microbiome and Host Transcriptome in the Small Airways of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(5):1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yip, William, Xuan Li, Graeme J. Koelwyn, Stephen Milne, Fernando Sergio Leitao Filho, Chen Xi Yang, Ana I. Hernández Cordero, Julia Yang, Cheng Wei Tony Yang, Tawimas Shaipanich, and et al. 2022. "Inhaled Corticosteroids Selectively Alter the Microbiome and Host Transcriptome in the Small Airways of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" Biomedicines 10, no. 5: 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop