Next Article in Journal
An In-Depth Analysis of Providers and Services of Cancellation in Anesthesia Reveals a Complex Picture after Systemic Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Amateur Female Athletes Perform the Running Split of a Triathlon Race at Higher Relative Intensity than the Male Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
The HEADS: UP Development Study: Working with Key Stakeholders to Adapt a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Course for People with Anxiety and Depression after Stroke
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Exercise on Fatigue and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of 24 Weeks of a Supervised Walk Training on Knee Muscle Strength and Quality of Life in Older Female Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1
Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Section, Chia-Pu Road, Chia-Yi County, Pu-Tz City 61363, Taiwan
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Section, Chia-Pu Road, Chia-Yi County, Pu-Tz City 61363, Taiwan
3
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan District, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan
4
Department of Athletic Sports, National Chung Cheng University, No. 168, University Road, Minhsiung Township, Chia-Yi County 62102, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Healthcare 2023, 11(3), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030356
Submission received: 5 December 2022 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 22 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023

Abstract

:
Poor supervision, impaired exercise adherence, and low compliance with exercise regimens result in inconsistent effects regarding exercise interventions. A supervised-walk training regimen (9 km/week) may have a positive effect on functional recovery in female total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a supervised walking regimen on lower limb muscle strength, functional fitness, and patient-reported outcomes in female TKA. Twenty-eight female TKA were allocated into a control (CON) (n = 14) or walk training (WT) (n = 14) group. WT on treadmills was initiated 12 weeks after TKA. All patients were examined for lower muscle strength (including extension and flexion of hip and knee), physical function (including a 6-min walk test, 8-foot up-and-go test, and 30-s chair stand test), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. Knee flexor (WT: CON; 64.4 ± 4.1 nm/kg: 43.7±3.3 nm/kg; p = 0.001; effect size: 5.62) and extensor strengths (WT: CON; 73.1 ± 7.5 nm/kg: 48.2 ± 2.4 nm/kg; p = 0.001; effect size: 4.47) statistically increased in the WT group compared to the CON group. The 6-min walk test (from 341.3 ± 20.5 m to 405.5 ± 30.7 m; p = 0.001; effect size: 2.46) and 8-foot up-and-go test (from 9.5 ± 0.7 s to 8.3 ± 0.7 s; p = 0.002; effect size: 1.71) tests also showed significant improvements in the WT group in the follow-up compared to the baseline. An increase in quality of life score according to the KOOS questionnaire (WT: CON; 91.0 ± 2.8: 68.1 ± 5.8; p = 0.001; effect size: 5.02) was noted in the WT group compared to the CON group in the follow-up. WT facilitated improvements in knee muscle strength and functional outcomes in TKA patients.

1. Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established knee reconstruction procedure for treating advanced osteoarthritis (OA) and a reliable surgical procedure for alleviating pain, accelerating functional recovery, and improving quality of life (QoL) with respect to patient-reported outcomes [1,2]. The number of patients undergoing TKA has steadily increased every year, and primary TKA patients aged <65 years are estimated to comprise more than half of all TKA patients in the United States [3]. Postoperative rehabilitation following TKA is an important issue. A decrease in the strength of both the quadriceps and hamstring occurs following TKA. This decline in the muscle strength of the lower limbs is associated with a decline in functional outcomes [4,5]. Postoperative rehabilitation aims to increase the range of motion of the knee, muscle strength, and proprioceptive functions after TKA. Various exercise interventions have been associated with different levels of positive effects in patients after TKA [6,7,8,9]; however, these effects are inconsistent because of poor supervision, impaired exercise adherence, and low compliance with exercise regimens [10,11,12].
Walking is the most common and essential physical activity of daily living (ADL). It is also a complex activity involving all levels of the neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory systems and has numerous health benefits [13]. Meanwhile, walking training has a positive effect on the health-related and perceived quality of Life in older persons [14,15]. Thus, we performed an easy training regimen, walk training (WT), on patients in TKA recovery for the purpose of reducing the bias of poor supervision. Because the number of female patients who had undergone TKA was approximately twice that of men between 2001 and 2010 [16], this study focused only on female patients who had undergone TKA. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measurements are routinely used in clinical research for assessing patients’ health statuses [17]. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire is the most reliable and relevant patient-reported outcome measurement to assess knee-specific and related problems, including patients’ quality of life [18]. Therefore, we used the KOOS questionnaire to evaluate the health status of TKA. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a supervised walking regimen on lower limb muscle strength, functional fitness, and patient-reported outcomes in female patients with TKA. We hypothesized that the WT would have positive effects on low limb muscle strength, performance on the functional fitness test, and KOOS in female TKA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The retrospective cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board (IRB: 102-0979B, Approval Date: 26 April 2013). The participants were recruited in the orthopedic clinic of the hospital, and the orthopedic physician explained the protocol to the participants. All patients provided informed consent. The eligibility criteria were female patients aged 60~80 who had been diagnosed with Ahlbäck stage III-IV knee OA [19] without infectious joint disease or rheumatic disease, and who had undergone TKA without additional surgeries such as ligament reconstruction or corrective osteotomy. Patients with diabetes, a neuromusculoskeletal disorder, history of fracture of the lower limb, or the presence of an artificial limb, as well as those who were unsuitable for exercise training, were excluded.
The participants were allocated into two groups by their willingness. Patients in the control (CON) and WT groups followed the routine postoperative rehabilitation protocol, including a self-administered straight leg raise (in a sitting position, static stretching exercises for hamstrings and gastrosoleus muscles), and a range of motion exercise consisting of terminal knee extension with weight; straight leg raises with weight in the supine and side-lying positions; and prone, hip, and knee flexion–extension with weight in supine as well as knee flexion–extension with weight in prone. Moreover, participants in the WT group practiced an extra walking intervention for 24 weeks.
WT was started 3 months after TKA, because patients could tolerate exercise training as the pain had notably decreased at this time [8]. All assessments in both the CON and WT groups were performed at the following time points (Supplementary Figure S1): preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively (baseline), 12 weeks after the start of training (mid-exercise), after training (post-exercise), and 12 weeks after completing the training (follow-up). All assessments in both groups were conducted on the same day by the same experienced investigator, who was blinded to the participant allocation, at the Sports Medicine Center.
From August 2015 to August 2017, 46 female patients with end-stage OA were identified from the author’s clinics. Among these, nine patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. In total, 37 female participants were enrolled. After the initial allocation, there were 18 patients in the CON group and 19 patients in the WT group. Because four patients in the CON group declined the following assessments and five patients in the WT group discontinued the intervention, nine patients were excluded from the final analysis. Thus, 28 patients (14 each in the CON and WT groups) completed the treatment regimen and were included in the final analysis (Figure 1; the template of the flow chart was adopted from the reference [20]).

2.2. Sample Size

The sample size was determined using G*power software version 3.1.9.7. (Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany). The input parameters used for the t test were alpha = 0.05, effect size d = 0.8, and the power was calculated as 0.8. The total sample size was calculated to be 30 participants, with fifteen participants in each group. In previous patients’ surveys, most patients were divided into different groups, with the number of people in each group ranging from 14 to 20 for statistical analysis [7,8,21]. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error (TE), and percentual coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated to access intertest correlation (Supplementary Table S1).

2.3. WT Course

Schimpl and his colleagues reported that the average walking speed of elders aged over 60 years is about 1.2 m/s (~4.32 km/h) [22]. Additionally, Serwe and his colleagues reported that the effective duration (30 minutes/day × 5 days) of walk training for increasing physical activity in women is a total of 2.5 hours a week [23]. Thus, a total distance of 10.8 km (4.32 km/h × 2.5 h = 10.8 km) per week might be an effective prescript of walk training for healthy women. Considering the patients’ baseline 6-minute walk testing results (average walking speed about 3.4 km/h in the two groups), a total distance of 8.5 km (3.4 km/h × 2.5 h = 8.5 km) a week was determined to be a more effective prescript of walk training for female TKA patients. Therefore, we determined that the training target was to finish a total of 9 km a week. The participants in the WT group were asked to complete a total distance of 9 km a week on the treadmill with unlimited walking speed, at an intensity of 50–70% of the target heart rate, monitored by a POLAR FT40 monitor (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland). The walking speed was dependent on the individual, and the entire training process was recorded and supervised by a trained physical therapist at the Sports Medicine Center. Maximum heart rate (100% target heart rate) was calculated using the 220-age formula [24]. During the training period, the patients’ motion and physical conditions were supervised by at least one trained physical therapist for the WT group. To determine the distance and reduce injury risk from the environment, such as uneven or sloping ground, WT was performed using the JOHNSON Matrix T50X treadmill (Johnson Health Tech, Taichung, Taiwan).

2.4. Muscle strength

The isokinetic dynamometer HUMAC NORM system (CSMi®, Stoughton, MA, USA) was used to assess the lower extremity muscle strength of the affected leg, including the extension and flexion of the hip and knee [7]. The muscle strength of the hip was evaluated when participants were in the supine position, and that of the knee was tested in the seated position. Angular velocity of 60° per second was set in the concentric contraction model. Isokinetic tests were performed five times for each examination, and the maximum force was recorded. There was a 3-min rest period between hip and knee trials. Body composition is associated with muscle strength, especially fat-free mass. To avoid the influence of body composition, the value of muscle strength was normalized by body weight. Normalized force is an effective and useful method to compare persons of different individual sizes [25].

2.5. Functional Fitness Test

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT), the 8-foot up-and-go test (8UG), and the 30-second chair stand test (30CST) were used to assess exercise capacity, motor agility, and lower-body muscle strength, respectively. The details of these tests, such as criterion-referenced standard, validity, and reliability, have been described in a previous study [26]. The procedure of 6MWT is to measure the distance that the subject can walk over a total of six minutes on a hard and flat surface. The protocol of the 8UG is to record the time that the subjects are asked to rise from a chair placed next to a wall, walk to a traffic cone at 8 feet in front of the chair, turn, walk back, and sit down. The 30CST is intended to record the number of times the subjects stand up with a straight back and hands on the opposite shoulder crossed at the wrists from a chair without armrests in 30 seconds.

2.6. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Questionnaire

Clinical knee scoring was used to assess outpatients’ self-reported outcomes by using the Chinese version of the KOOS questionnaire [27]. KOOS contains forty-two items in the five subscales, named Symptoms (seven items), Pain (nine items), Activity of daily livings (ADL; seventeen items), Sport (five items), and knee-related quality of life (QoL; four items). All items have five possible answer options presented with a Likert scale. The scores range from 0 (Good) to 4 (Worse). Each subscale score is calculated using 100 M e a n   s c o r e   A l l   i t e m s   i n   e a c h   s u b s c a l e   ×   100 4 formulas, and scores are transformed to a 0–100 scale. A zero score indicates an extreme problem.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Windows version 17.0 (SPSS®, Chicago, IL, USA). The difference in demographic data between the two groups was tested by the unpaired Student’s t-test. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) [28] were used to resolve the differences of each assessment outcome between the WT and CON groups, as well as within the groups. The Shapiro–Wilk results showed no abnormal distributions in either group in pre-operation (Supplementary Table S2). The effect size (ES) was used to measure the difference between group means. The relative ES was calculated using Cohen’s d, which is defined as the difference between two means divided by a standard deviation for the data. The primary outcome of the study was the QoL subscale of KOOS. The effect size between the CON and WT groups at follow-up was 5.02, which indicates a huge effect size [29]. The ideal power was considered to be 80%, with a 0.05 type I error. All continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. To reduce bias, we attempted to identify controls with matching ages and body mass indices.

3. Results

The patients’ demographic data are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 68.5 ± 6.6 and 69.7 ± 2.8 years in the CON and WT groups, respectively. Height and weight were similar between the CON and WT groups. Lower extremity muscle strength, functional test results, and KOOS scores were similar between the CON and WT groups (p > 0.05).
In the lower extremity muscle strength assessment, the WT group exhibited a significant increase in hip extensor, knee extensor, and knee flexor muscle strengths compared to the CON group at the post-exercise assessment, and the differences in knee extensor and flexor muscle strengths lasted until the follow-up (Table 2). When participants were compared within each group in a temporal manner (Table 3), the CON group exhibited a significant increase only in knee extensor muscle strength at the final follow-up compared with the baseline measurement. However, the WT group exhibited a significant increase in hip extensor, knee extensor, and knee flexor measurements at the post-exercise assessment compared with the baseline. The knee extensors even exhibited a significant increase in muscle strength during the mid-exercise assessment.
The functional outcomes of the functional fitness tests (Table 4) revealed that the results of the 6MWT, 8UG, and 30CST did not differ significantly between the CON and WT groups at each assessment time point. However, in the temporal comparison (Table 5), the results of the 6MWT and 8UG showed significant improvements at the mid-exercise, post-exercise, and follow-up measurements compared with baseline measurements in the WT group, but not in the CON group.
The self-explanatory KOOS questionnaire revealed (Table 6) that the QoL subscale was significantly increased in the WT group compared to the CON group at follow-up. When a temporal comparison was performed within each group (Table 7), scores for the subscales of symptoms, pain, and ADL exhibited significant improvements in both the CON and WT groups at the follow-up compared with the baseline. The improvement in scores in the pain and ADL subscales in the WT group occurred at an earlier time point (pain scores decreased at the post-exercise evaluation; ADL scores increased at the mid-and post-exercise evaluations). Among these subcategories, scores for the QoL subscale in the WT group exhibited a significant increase in the post-exercise and follow-up assessments compared with the baseline; however, these improvements were not observed in the CON group.

4. Discussion

The most important findings of the present study were the statistical increase in the QoL subcategory of KOOS and the knee muscle strength (extensors and flexors) in the WT group compared to the CON group at follow-up (Table 2 and Table 6). While the comparison was performed within the individual group in a temporal manner (Table 3 and Table 5), the knee extensors and functional fitness test (6 MWT: ambulatory capacity, 8UG: motor agility) in the WT group were improved at the mid-exercise, post-exercise, and follow-up measurements compared with the baseline, suggesting that WT enhanced the recovery of functional mobility after TKA [30,31,32,33]. These increases were based on the concomitant improvements in the pain, symptoms, and ADL subcategories of KOOS after TKA, quadriceps training, and range of motion exercises [10,34,35]. In addition to the range of motion of knee and muscle strength on which the TKA standard exercises focus, WT may provide extra endurance and proprioception.
Many studies have shown that an increase in the quadriceps strength of TKA patients is associated with superior outcomes and performance [36,37,38,39,40]. Previous studies have also revealed that muscle strengthening improves quadriceps strength and functional fitness test scores (timed up-and-go, stair-climbing test, and 6MWT) [41,42]. Our results were similar to other findings in the literature, and showed that the knee extensor and flexor strength in the WT group significantly improved compared with the CON group (Table 2). In the temporal comparison within individual groups, the knee extensor improvement in the WT group occurred simultaneously with the improvements in the 6MWT and 8UG functional tests (Table 4 and Table 5), as well as in the ADL domains of KOOS (Table 6 and Table 7). These results imply that lower leg muscle strength is a determinant physical factor and plays a pivotal role in functional outcomes in TKA patients [43,44]. However, no significant difference in the 6MWT, 8UG, or the ADL subscales of KOOS was observed between the two groups. The lack of a significant difference might have resulted from the small sample size.
All patients in the WT group were supervised by a trained physical therapist during training, and no patient in the WT group reported discomfort or needed further medical management. Our results suggest that WT is beneficial for patients who have undergone TKA. Considering the ease of standardization and performance of WT, it can be effectively applied during rehabilitation following TKA in community-dwelling patients. However, a trained physical therapist also plays an important role in the intervention. In this study, a therapist monitored the status of the participants and gave real-time assistance when the participants had an issue during the exercise. Therefore, the deployment of a trained physical therapist would be recommended.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, evidence regarding the entire effect of WT in TKA was restricted because of the small sample size in this retrospective study. Nevertheless, improvements in muscle strength and function over time indicated the benefits of WT in TKA. Second, our results (12 months after surgery) did not fully demonstrate the long-term effects of WT. The results showed that multiple metrics gradually improved in the CON group. Third, there was no random allocation, and certain participants could be more motivated, which could influence the results. Thus, a larger randomized controlled trial is needed to verify the findings of this study, as it was limited to only 28 who completed the study out of 46 total patients. Fourth, neuromuscular activation also plays a critical role in muscle function. Electromyography of the lower limbs might be included for greater clarity regarding the effect of WT on the neuromuscular system in further study.

5. Conclusions

During WT, no patient in the WT exercise group reported discomfort or injury or required further medical management. The 9 km/week WT protocol is feasible for TKA patients. The WT could significantly improve muscle strength (knee flexion and extension), functional outcome (6WT and 8UG), and QoL of patients. The simplicity of WT could reduce the limitations of poor supervision, impaired exercise adherence, and low compliance with exercise regimens, which cause poor rehabilitation outcomes. The authors believe that WT should be broadly applied in the rehabilitation of patients who have undergone TKA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11030356/s1, Figure S1: Schematic diagram of the experimental time course; Table S1: The coefficient of validity and reliability in the WT and CON groups; Table S2: Shapiro–Wilk test of normality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.-R.L. and W.-W.R.H.; methodology, W.-H.H., W.-B.H. and W.-W.R.H.; software, S.-H.C. and C.-H.F.; validation, W.-H.H., W.-B.H., Z.-R.L. and W.-W.R.H.; formal analysis, S.-H.C. and C.-H.F.; investigation, W.-H.H., W.-B.H. and W.-W.R.H.; resources, W.-H.H., W.-B.H. and W.-W.R.H.; data curation, S.-H.C. and C.-H.F.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-H.H. and W.-B.H.; writing—review and editing, W.-H.H., W.-B.H. and W.-W.R.H.; supervision, L.-T.K., Z.-R.L. and W.-W.R.H.; project administration, W.-W.R.H.; funding acquisition, W.-W.R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Grant, grant number CORPG6C0021-23, CORPG6C0011-13, CORPG6G0251-52, CORPG6G0261-62, CMRPG6K0161-3, CMRPG6G0311, CMRPG6I0011, and CMRPG6K0131-3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Approval No. 102-0979B, Approval Date: 26 April 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Remaining data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chia-Fang Chang for collecting the participants’ data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hussain, S.M.; Neilly, D.W.; Baliga, S.; Patil, S.; Meek, R. Knee osteoarthritis: A review of management options. Scott. Med. J. 2016, 61, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schiavone Panni, A.; Falez, F.; D’Apolito, R.; Corona, K.; Perisano, C.; Vasso, M. Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant. Int. Orthop. 2017, 41, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Singh, J.A.; Yu, S.; Chen, L.; Cleveland, J.D. Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020–2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample. J. Rheumatol. 2019, 46, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Paravlic, A.H.; Kovac, S.; Pisot, R.; Marusic, U. Neurostructural correlates of strength decrease following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Paravlic, A.H.; Meulenberg, C.J.; Drole, K. The Time Course of Quadriceps Strength Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Influenced by Body Mass Index, Sex, and Age of Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 865412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pozzi, F.; Snyder-Mackler, L.; Zeni, J. Physical exercise after knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of controlled trials. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2013, 49, 877–892. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hsu, W.H.; Hsu, W.B.; Shen, W.J.; Lin, Z.R.; Chang, S.H.; Hsu, R.W. Circuit training enhances function in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2017, 12, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hsu, W.H.; Hsu, W.B.; Shen, W.J.; Lin, Z.R.; Chang, S.H.; Hsu, R.W. Twenty-four-week hospital-based progressive resistance training on functional recovery in female patients post total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2019, 26, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Henderson, K.G.; Wallis, J.A.; Snowdon, D.A. Active physiotherapy interventions following total knee arthroplasty in the hospital and inpatient rehabilitation settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2018, 104, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hiyama, Y.; Kamitani, T.; Wada, O.; Mizuno, K.; Yamada, M. Effects of Group-Based Exercise on Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, Functional Ability, and Pain During the Acute Phase After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016, 46, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Han, A.S.; Nairn, L.; Harmer, A.R.; Crosbie, J.; March, L.; Parker, D.; Crawford, R.; Fransen, M. Early rehabilitation after total knee replacement surgery: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial comparing a home exercise program with usual outpatient care. Arthritis Care Res. 2015, 67, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, M.; Li, P.; Lin, F. Influence of structured telephone follow-up on patient compliance with rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2016, 10, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sipila, S.; Tirkkonen, A.; Hanninen, T.; Laukkanen, P.; Alen, M.; Fielding, R.A.; Kivipelto, M.; Kokko, K.; Kulmala, J.; Rantanen, T.; et al. Promoting safe walking among older people: The effects of a physical and cognitive training intervention vs. physical training alone on mobility and falls among older community-dwelling men and women (the PASSWORD study): Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Monteagudo, P.; Roldan, A.; Cordellat, A.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; Blasco-Lafarga, C. Continuous Compared to Accumulated Walking-Training on Physical Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sedentary Older Persons. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Les, A.; Guszkowska, M.; Piotrowska, J.; Rutkowska, I. Changes in perceived quality of life and subjective age in older women participating in Nordic Walking classes and memory training. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2019, 59, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Whitlock, K.G.; Piponov, H.I.; Shah, S.H.; Wang, O.J.; Gonzalez, M.H. Gender Role in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes in US Patients. J. Arthroplast. 2016, 31, 2736–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deshpande, P.R.; Rajan, S.; Sudeepthi, B.L.; Abdul Nazir, C.P. Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2011, 2, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roos, E.M.; Toksvig-Larsen, S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—Validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2003, 1, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ahlback, S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1968, 227, 7–72. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chun, E.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Woo, J.H. Which is your choice for prolonging the analgesic duration of single-shot interscalene brachial blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery? intravenous dexamethasone 5 mg vs. perineural dexamethasone 5 mg randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Medicine 2016, 95, e3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Savkin, R.; Buker, N.; Gungor, H.R. The effects of preoperative neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the postoperative quadriceps muscle strength and functional status in patients with fast-track total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2021, 87, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schimpl, M.; Moore, C.; Lederer, C.; Neuhaus, A.; Sambrook, J.; Danesh, J.; Ouwehand, W.; Daumer, M. Association between walking speed and age in healthy, free-living individuals using mobile accelerometry—A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Serwe, K.M.; Swartz, A.M.; Hart, T.L.; Strath, S.J. Effectiveness of long and short bout walking on increasing physical activity in women. J. Women’s Health 2011, 20, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Riebe, D.; Liguori, G.; Magal, M. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 10th ed.; Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bazett-Jones, D.M.; Cobb, S.C.; Joshi, M.N.; Cashin, S.E.; Earl, J.E. Normalizing hip muscle strength: Establishing body-size-independent measurements. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2011, 92, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rikli, R.E.; Jones, C.J. Development and validation of criterion-referenced clinically relevant fitness standards for maintaining physical independence in later years. Gerontologist 2013, 53, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Peer, M.A.; Lane, J. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): A review of its psychometric properties in people undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2013, 43, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, K.-Y.; Zeger, S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986, 73, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sawilowsky, S. New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 2009, 8, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Unver, B.; Kalkan, S.; Yuksel, E.; Kahraman, T.; Karatosun, V. Reliability of the 50-foot walk test and 30-sec chair stand test in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop. Bras. 2015, 23, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ko, V.; Naylor, J.M.; Harris, I.A.; Crosbie, J.; Yeo, A.E. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2013, 14, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rossi, M.D.; Hasson, S.; Kohia, M.; Pineda, E.; Bryan, W. Mobility and perceived function after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2006, 21, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Calatayud, J.; Casana, J.; Ezzatvar, Y.; Jakobsen, M.D.; Sundstrup, E.; Andersen, L.L. High-intensity preoperative training improves physical and functional recovery in the early post-operative periods after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017, 25, 2864–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fransen, M.; McConnell, S.; Harmer, A.R.; Van der Esch, M.; Simic, M.; Bennell, K.L. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 1, CD004376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Taniguchi, M.; Sawano, S.; Kugo, M.; Maegawa, S.; Kawasaki, T.; Ichihashi, N. Physical Activity Promotes Gait Improvement in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2016, 31, 984–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mizner, R.L.; Petterson, S.C.; Stevens, J.E.; Axe, M.J.; Snyder-Mackler, L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty. J. Rheumatol. 2005, 32, 1533–1539. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mizner, R.L.; Petterson, S.C.; Snyder-Mackler, L. Quadriceps strength and the time course of functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2005, 35, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mizner, R.L.; Petterson, S.C.; Stevens, J.E.; Vandenborne, K.; Snyder-Mackler, L. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005, 87, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mizner, R.L.; Snyder-Mackler, L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 2005, 23, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saleh, K.J.; Lee, L.W.; Gandhi, R.; Ingersoll, C.D.; Mahomed, N.N.; Sheibani-Rad, S.; Novicoff, W.M.; Mihalko, W.M. Quadriceps strength in relation to total knee arthroplasty outcomes. Instr. Course Lect. 2010, 59, 119–130. [Google Scholar]
  41. Petterson, S.C.; Mizner, R.L.; Stevens, J.E.; Raisis, L.; Bodenstab, A.; Newcomb, W.; Snyder-Mackler, L. Improved function from progressive strengthening interventions after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial with an imbedded prospective cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 61, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Johnson, A.W.; Myrer, J.W.; Hunter, I.; Feland, J.B.; Hopkins, J.T.; Draper, D.O.; Eggett, D. Whole-body vibration strengthening compared to traditional strengthening during physical therapy in individuals with total knee arthroplasty. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2010, 26, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Accettura, A.J.; Brenneman, E.C.; Stratford, P.W.; Maly, M.R. Knee Extensor Power Relates to Mobility Performance in People with Knee Osteoarthritis: Cross-Sectional Analysis. Phys. Ther. 2015, 95, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pua, Y.H.; Seah, F.J.; Clark, R.A.; Lian-Li Poon, C.; Tan, J.W.; Chong, H.C. Factors associated with gait speed recovery after total knee arthroplasty: A longitudinal study. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2017, 46, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient enrollment.
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient enrollment.
Healthcare 11 00356 g001
Table 1. The demographic characters of patients at the pre-operative assessment.
Table 1. The demographic characters of patients at the pre-operative assessment.
CharactersCON (N = 14)WT (N = 14)pES
Age (years)68.5 ± 6.669.7 ± 2.80.3720.23
Height (cm)152.0 ± 5.8152.8 ± 4.90.8770.14
Weight (kg)65.9 ± 11.566.4 ± 9.80.6820.04
BMI (kg/m2)28.4 ± 4.028.4 ± 3.40.5670.01
Pre-operation
Muscle strength
HE (Nm/kg)72.0 ± 8.279.0 ± 9.20.5710.80
HF (Nm/kg)32.4 ± 3.531.3 ± 4.10.8440.28
KE (Nm/kg)42.1 ± 2.941.5 ± 5.30.9410.14
KF (Nm/kg)41.8 ± 3.045.2 ± 2.40.3761.25
Functional test
6MWT (m)309.1 ± 31.4326.1 ± 29.70.6930.55
8UG (sec)9.5 ± 1.610.7 ± 1.30.5410.82
30s-CST (Times)10.6 ± 1.110.4 ± 0.90.8360.19
KOOS
Sym63.9 ± 5.163.7 ± 6.30.9830.03
Pain65.6 ± 4.863.8 ± 5.60.8170.31
ADL64.5 ± 4.968.4 ± 6.20.6110.69
Sports40.6 ± 7.135.5 ± 4.40.5500.86
QoL61.1 ± 5.451.5 ± 5.80.2181.71
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; HE: hip extension; HF: hip flexion; KE: knee extension; KF: knee flexion; 6MWT: 6-min walk test; 8UG: 8-foot up-and-go; 30 s-CST: 30-s chair stand test; Sym: symptom; ADL: activity of daily living; QoL: quality of life; ES: effect size. There was no difference between the two groups.
Table 2. Comparison of muscle strength between two groups of TKA patients.
Table 2. Comparison of muscle strength between two groups of TKA patients.
(Nm/kg)BaselineMid-ExercisePost-ExerciseFollow-Up
CONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESp
HE71.5 ± 5.485.9 ± 9.91.580.19974.6 ± 9.6102.6 ± 12.52.510.07477.5 ± 8.0116.9 ± 11.3 §4.020.004 *87.6 ± 10.6106.8 ± 9.4 §1.910.177
HF27. 6 ± 2.833.4 ± 3.61.790.19026.4 ± 4.334.5 ± 4.21.900.17227.4 ± 3.637.1 ± 4.72.320.09429.6 ± 3.133.9 ± 5.40.970.452
KE40.3 ± 5.145.2 ± 4.91.170.47645.9 ± 4.157.6 ± 5.7 §2.360.09148.2 ± 2.473.1 ± 7.5 §4.470.001 *54.2 ± 3.2 §71.4 ± 6.6 §3.310.019 *
KF43.6 ± 4.046.1 ± 3.00.700.61549.8 ± 3.654.1 ± 4.01.130.40643.7 ± 3.364.4 ± 4.1 §5.620.001 *43.1 ± 3.065.0 ± 2.6 §1.270.001 *
Data are presented as mean ± SD. *: A significant difference between two groups. §: Significant difference compared to baseline within the individual group (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; HE: hip extension; HF: hip flexion; KE: knee extension; KF: knee flexion; ES: effect size. There were significant differences in knee extension and flexion between the two groups.
Table 3. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of muscle strength between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
Table 3. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of muscle strength between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
ESp
VariableMid-ExercisePost-Exercise Follow-Up Mid-Exercise Post-Exercise Follow-Up
WTHE1.482.922.170.2110.0020.024
HF0.280.880.110.7510.5140.154
KE2.334.404.510.0320.0010.012
KF2.265.096.730.3010.0020.001
CONHE0.400.881.910.4680.2160.165
HF0.330.060.680.5320.1510.205
KE1.211.983.260.5410.3040.023
KF1.630.030.140.6650.5010.487
Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; HE: hip extension; HF: hip flexion; KE: knee extension; KF: knee flexion; ES: effect size.
Table 4. Comparison of physical function fitness between the two groups of TKA patients.
Table 4. Comparison of physical function fitness between the two groups of TKA patients.
BaselineMid-ExercisePost-ExerciseFollow-Up
CONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESp
6MWT (m)331.0 ± 16.5341.3 ± 20.50.550.696346.6 ± 14.8375.2 ± 21.4 §1.550.271346.1 ± 16.8400.1 ± 23.8 §2.620.40345.8 ± 16.5405.5 ± 30.7 §2.420.093
8UG (sec)10.4 ± 0.79.5 ± 0.71.280.3869.1 ± 0.58.5 ± 0.5 §1.200.4279.1 ± 0.88.6 ± 0.8 §0.620.6929.2 ± 0.6 8.3 ± 0.7 §1.380.302
30s-CST
(Times)
11.9 ± 0.912.2 ± 0.70.370.76412.6 ± 0.614.0 ± 1.01.690.23812.6 ± 0.814.21 ± 1.01.760.21112.8 ± 0.714.0 ± 1.21.220.370
Data are presented as mean ± SD. §: Significant difference compared to baseline within the individual group (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; 6MWT: 6-minute walk test; 8UG: 8 feet up-and-go; 30s-CST: 30-second chair stand test; ES: effect size. 6MWT and 8UG tests were statistically improved after WT in female TKA patients at the post-exercise and follow-up evaluations.
Table 5. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of physical function fitness between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
Table 5. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of physical function fitness between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
ESp
VariableMid-Exercise Post-Exercise Follow-Up Mid-Exercise Post-Exercise Follow-Up
WT6MWT1.622.652.460.0310.0120.001
8UG1.641.201.710.0290.0310.002
30s-CST2.092.331.830.3760.4710.389
CON6MWT0.960.900.850.5880.5460.437
8UG2.141.731.840.6320.6520.594
30s-CST0.920.821.120.4170.3740.360
Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; 6MWT: 6-minute walk test; 8UG: 8 feet up-and-go; 30s-CST: 30-second chair stand test; ES: effect size.
Table 6. Comparison of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales between two groups of TKA patients.
Table 6. Comparison of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales between two groups of TKA patients.
Baseline Mid-ExercisePost-Exercise Follow-Up
CONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESpCONWTESp
Sym62.1 ± 4.971.1 ± 5.41.740.20071.2 ± 5.7 §76.0 ± 4.70.910.48770.9 ± 4.978.2 ± 3.91.640.25383.0 ± 4.1 §86.7 ± 3.8 §0.930.514
Pain78.2 ± 3.479.5 ± 4.40.330.79484.8 ± 3.587.6 ± 4.00.740.58484.3 ± 4.390.5 ± 2.0 §1.840.18591.1 ± 3.1 §97.3 ± 1.5 §2.540.072
ADL76.3 ± 3.276.6 ± 4.70.070.92380.2 ± 5.189.8 ± 2.4§2.400.08378.7 ± 5.187.6 ± 2.6 §2.190.11892.0 ± 2.5 §94.6 ± 1.3 §1.300.322
Sports47.0 ± 5.242.3 ± 2.81.120.43943.6 ± 3.850.5 ± 4.51.650.22945.1 ± 4.744.0 ± 2.80.280.83545.2 ± 3.845.6 ± 4.90.090.936
QoL56.6 ± 4.760.0 ± 6.30.610.69664.6 ± 7.371.4 ± 6.01.010.47463.4 ± 5.872.8 ± 4.3 §1.840.19368.1 ± 5.891.0 ± 2.8 §5.020.001 *
Data are presented as mean ± SD. *: A significant difference between two groups. §: Significant difference compared to baseline within the individual group (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CON: control; WT: walk training; Sym: symptom; ADL: activity of daily livings; QoL: quality of life; ES: effect size. The scores of the QoL subscale in the WT group exhibited a significant increase in the post-exercise and follow-up assessments compared with the baseline.
Table 7. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of KOOS subscales between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
Table 7. The effect sizes and p-values of comparison of KOOS subscales between different time points and baselines within the WT and CON groups.
ESp
VariableMid-Exercise Post-Exercise Follow-Up Mid-Exercise Post-Exercise Follow-Up
WTSym0.971.513.340.5210.3210.002
Pain1.933.225.420.0740.0240.002
ADL3.542.905.220.0320.0080.002
Sports2.190.610.830.6580.7130.072
QoL1.852.376.360.0670.0120.001
CONSym1.711.804.630.0470.0510.035
Pain1.911.573.970.5140.6240.041
ADL0.920.565.470.7270.6940.037
Sports0.750.380.400.8650.7920.698
QoL1.301.292.180.4760.5230.331
Abbreviation: CON: control; WT: walk training; Sym: symptom; ADL: activity of daily livings; QoL: quality of life; ES: effect size.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsu, W.-H.; Hsu, W.-B.; Lin, Z.-R.; Chang, S.-H.; Fan, C.-H.; Kuo, L.-T.; Hsu, W.-W.R. Effects of 24 Weeks of a Supervised Walk Training on Knee Muscle Strength and Quality of Life in Older Female Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Healthcare 2023, 11, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030356

AMA Style

Hsu W-H, Hsu W-B, Lin Z-R, Chang S-H, Fan C-H, Kuo L-T, Hsu W-WR. Effects of 24 Weeks of a Supervised Walk Training on Knee Muscle Strength and Quality of Life in Older Female Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Healthcare. 2023; 11(3):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsu, Wei-Hsiu, Wei-Bin Hsu, Zin-Rong Lin, Shr-Hsin Chang, Chun-Hao Fan, Liang-Tseng Kuo, and Wen-Wei Robert Hsu. 2023. "Effects of 24 Weeks of a Supervised Walk Training on Knee Muscle Strength and Quality of Life in Older Female Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study" Healthcare 11, no. 3: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop