Next Article in Journal
Examining the Public Messaging on ‘Loneliness’ over Social Media: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis of Twitter Posts over the Past Decade
Next Article in Special Issue
A Proxy Approach to Family Involvement and Neurocognitive Function in First Episode of Non-Affective Psychosis: Sex-Related Differences
Previous Article in Journal
Affecting Factors of Prostate Volume in Forensic Autopsied Decedents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neurological Soft Signs in Schizophrenia, a Picture of the Knowledge in the Last Decade: A Scoping Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/healthcare11101487
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Systematic Review of the Apomorphine Challenge Test in the Assessment of Dopaminergic Activity in Schizophrenia

by
Fabrice Duval
Pôle 8/9-APF2R, Centre Hospitalier, 68250 Rouffach, France
Healthcare 2023, 11(10), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101487
Submission received: 13 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 17 May 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological and Clinical Aspects on the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
So far, neuroendocrine studies conducted in schizophrenic patients have yielded conflicting results. Many of these discrepancies may be explained by the diversity of factors that influence the hormonal levels (at baseline and in response to pharmacological stimuli), the heterogeneity of the populations studied, the absence of standardization of test challenges and the confounding and long-lasting effects of previous treatments. Numerous studies have used apomorphine (APO) in the evaluation of dopaminergic (DA) function in schizophrenic patients. APO, a direct acting DA receptor agonist, decreases prolactin (PRL) and stimulates growth hormone (GH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol secretion. Therefore, the magnitude of hormonal responses to APO is an indirect assessment of the functionality of DA receptors at the hypothalamic–pituitary level. This review provides an update on the applications of the APO test in schizophrenia in clinical, pathophysiological and therapeutic fields.

1. Introduction

The “original dopamine (DA) hypothesis” regarding the biological basis of schizophrenia (SCZ), formulated in the 1960s, postulated an enhancement of brain DA function [1]. A refinement of this hypothesis proposes that SCZ might be associated with an excess of subcortical DA activity (resulting in hyperstimulation of DA-D2 receptors and positive symptoms [including hallucinations and delusions]) and a deficit in cortical DA function (resulting in hypostimulation of DA-D1 receptors, negative symptoms [including anhedonia, lack of motivation, poverty of speech], and cognitive impairment) [2]. In other words, the “revised DA hypothesis” states that in SCZ, DA transmission is hypoactive in the prefrontal cortex and hyperactive in the mesolimbic areas.
However, little is known about DA activity at the hypothalamic–pituitary level in SCZ. As illustrated in Figure 1, the hypothalamus—which together with the substantia nigra and the ventral tegmental area produces DA—is a region of the brain that receives its inputs from various areas (particularly the limbic system) and in turn releases both releasing and inhibiting hormones which act on the pituitary gland.
Apomorphine (APO), a non-selective short acting DA receptor agonist which stimulates D1-like (D1, D5) and D2-like (D2S/2L, D3, D4) receptors, has been used as a pharmacological probe of central DA function in psychiatric patients, especially in SCZs [3,4,5]. APO decreases prolactin (PRL) secretion (via D2 receptors of pituitary lactotrophs) and stimulates growth hormone (GH). APO—administered at a dose of 0.75 mg subcutaneously [4,6]—also stimulates adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and consequently cortisol secretion. Stimulation of GH and ACTH is secondary to agonization of D1-like and D2-like receptors on neurons in the hypothalamus which regulate the release of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) [4,7].
Despite tremendous advances in the investigation of the biology of schizophrenia made over the past four decades, the APO test by assessing the functionality of DA receptors at the hypothalamic–pituitary level—a region poorly explored by imaging techniques—still provides important clues to the biopathology underlying the processes involved in the heterogeneity of schizophrenia. Additionally, APO remains a useful tool for characterizing the effects of antipsychotic drugs on DA receptors. The aim of this review is therefore to provide an overview of the clinical and therapeutic applications of the APO challenge test in SCZ inpatients.

2. Methods

2.1. Screening and Selection Process

A literature search was performed in the PubMed database for papers written in English and French prior to April 2023. The following search terms were used: (”prolactin” OR “growth hormone” OR “ACTH”OR “cortisol”) AND (“schizophrenia”) AND (“apomorphine”).

2.2. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Studies were included if participants were adults (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The exclusion criteria were: (1) non-original studies (including review articles); (2) no comparison condition; (3) preclinical studies; (4) no full-text available; (5) no drug-free period before performing the APO test.
Figure 2 summarizes the selection process for studies included in the present review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) statement [8].
A total of 33 studies were eligible.

3. Literature Findings

3.1. Procedures

The effects of acute administration of APO in humans are known to be dose-dependent, including vomiting, hypothermia, yawning, penile erection, sedation, changes in motor activity and mood (see [7] for a review). Given poor oral bioavailability, owing the first-pass effect, APO is administered subcutaneously (SC) for use as a challenge test. In psychiatric patients, the rapid onset of action after SC injection, short half-life, and safety have led to the use of APO-induced hormonal responses to assess central DA activity. Despite the low doses used (≤0.75 mg SC), the most commonly reported side effects are nausea (and sometimes even vomiting), dizzying sensation, and a moderate drop in blood pressure (requiring blood pressure monitoring during the test).
As mentioned in Table 1, the APO test is relatively well standardized since the dose administered in approximately 80% of studies is 0.75 mg SC (which is considered as a subemetic dose). Some studies, however, used 0.5 mg, which theoretically seems more appropriate for demonstrating hypersensitivity of DA receptors [9,10]. Usually, the APO test is performed in the morning (at 8 or 9 a.m.) in hospitalized patients, followed by blood samples collected during 80–160 min (at 15–30 min intervals) for assay of PRL and/or GH. In five studies [4,5,11,12,13], ACTH and/or cortisol were also measured (the minimum dose for ACTH/cortisol stimulation being 0.75 mg SC [6]). The maximum activity of APO on hormonal responses is observed between 15 and 30 min [4]. All studies cited in Table 1 evaluated unmedicated patients—the minimum drug-free period was 1 week, but in most studies the drug-free period was more than 2 weeks avoiding therefore the residual effects of previous medications (all patients included were not treated with long lasting antipsychotics). In this respect, normal baseline PRL level is a good index of the lack of residual impregnation of antipsychotics, given these drugs block D2 receptors and induce hyperprolactinemia. However, no study measured serum APO which could have ruled out pharmacokinetic differences as a source of bias in the results.

3.2. Hormonal Responses to Apomorphine in Schizophrenic Patients

Discrepant findings have been reported in the literature reflecting the heterogeneity of the populations studied, in terms of symptoms (positive vs. negative), duration and phase of the illness (acute vs. chronic), specific effect of stress or hospitalization, quality of antipsychotic withdrawal, and extraneous variables (age, gender, menstrual status, weight loss or gain).

3.2.1. Prolactin Response

A decreased PRL suppression was reported by some investigators [15,24], particularly in chronic SCZs, but the vast majority of studies found no significant difference between SCZs and healthy controls (HCs) or patients with affective disorders [3,4,5,11,12,13,14,21,22,23,31]. The APO–PRL response does not predict clinical response to subsequent classical antipsychotic treatment [12]. However, higher PRL suppression at baseline has been reported in subsequent clozapine responders [32].
A major issue is that the magnitude of PRL suppression following APO is correlated with baseline, meaning that the higher the PRL baseline values, the greater the suppression [24]. This is why PRL suppression (PRLs) is frequently expressed as a percentage of change from baseline [3], rather than an area under the curve; by doing so, PRL values are no longer correlated with PRL baseline values (this also minimizes the gender effect since women often have higher baseline PRL levels [4]).

3.2.2. Growth Hormone Response

The GH response is usually expressed as GH peak value or difference between peak and baseline values [∆GH], more rarely as area under the curve. To avoid bias in the assessment of GH response, subjects with increased GH baseline (i.e., ≥4–6 mg/mL) are excluded from the analysis in most studies.
Some studies [3,10,17,18,26], but not all [15,28], reported that acute SCZ were more prone to exhibit increased GH responses than chronic SCZs. Additionally, in a longitudinal study, it has been found an association between increased GH responses and relapse [20].
Chronic and sub-chronic SCZs, especially those with positive symptoms, frequently show reduced GH responses [4,5,11,17,23,28,31] compared to matched HCs, but this finding has not been unanimously reported [3,29]. In one study [3], GH peak was correlated with negative symptoms.
Duration of the illness might also influence the APO–GH response since a negative correlation was found by Meltzer et al. [3]—however, this correlation disappeared when data were corrected for age.
Usually, GH response to APO decreases with age, both in patients (with various psychiatric diagnoses) and healthy subjects [11]. Consequently, age could be a confounding factor in the interpretation of the results. This could explain, in part, the increased GH responses reported in acute SCZs who are generally younger than chronic SCZs.
Some studies suggest that the APO–GH response might be predictive of subsequent response to antipsychotic treatment. Regarding first-generation antipsychotics (i.e., neuroleptics [NLs]), it has been found that SCZs having high GH response subsequently failed to respond to NLs, while NLs responders had low GH response at baseline [32]; unfortunately, these results were not confirmed [12,17]. Lieberman et al. [33] reported that clozapine responders had, at baseline, greater GH response than non-responders. In one study, performed in patients with schizophrenic symptoms (i.e., SCZs or SADs), lithium responders had, at baseline, higher APO-induced GH stimulation than non-responders [34]; until now, this study has not been replicated.

3.2.3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Hormone Response

So far, studies evaluating the ACTH and/or cortisol responses to APO consistently found reduced values in SCZs compared to HCs. The pioneering study of Mokrani et al. [4] showing decreased cortisol responses in SCZs was replicated by Meltzer’ s group [12], and all the studies we have performed subsequently also confirm this finding. The ACTH and cortisol responses are significantly reduced in SCZs with positive symptoms [4,5,11,13]. On the other hand, disorganized SCZs have comparable APO–ACTH/cortisol responses to those of HCs [4,13]. It can also be mentioned that unlike the PRL and GH responses, the ACTH/cortisol responses are neither influenced by the sex nor by the age of subjects. Moreover, the ACTH/cortisol responses appear independent of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity, as assessed by the serum cortisol response to the dexamethasone suppression test [4,5,11].
In one study [12], the APO-stimulated cortisol response was predictive of subsequent clinical response to antipsychotic treatment (either typical NLs or clozapine), responders having higher cortisol responses than non-responders.

3.3. Pathophysiology

As shown in Figure 1, APO has multiple sites of action at the hypothalamic–pituitary level: it inhibits directly PRL secretion from the pituitary and stimulates GH and ACTH/cortisol secretion via stimulation of GHRH and CRH from the hypothalamus.
The blunted APO–PRL response found in some SCZs, which is unlikely to be due to a residual NL effect (given the normality of the baseline PRL value), could reflect a decreased functionality (or sensitivity) of D2 receptor of the lactotroph cells. This could be adaptive to increased activity of TIDA neurons (releasing an increased amount of presynaptic DA), possibly secondary to understimulation of D2 autoreceptors. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. However, it is also possible that PRLs blunting in some patients might be due to functional impairment of lactotrophs. Nevertheless, this hypothesis is not supported by the results of the protirelin (or TRH) tests, since the PRL responses to TRH tests (performed at 8 a.m. and 11 p.m.) are normal in SCZs [35].
Regarding the reduced APO–GH responses, often observed in chronic SCZs, it has been hypothesized a hyposensitivity of post-synaptic D1-like and D2-like receptors on neurons in the hypothalamus which regulate the release of GHRH [3,4,11]. Conversely, increased GH responses, more often observed in acute SCZs, would reflect a hypersensitivity of D1-like and D2-like receptors of GHRH neurons. However, the interpretation of these results is not unequivocal. D1-like and D2-like receptors are both stimulated by APO [36]. According to the “high output/low sensitivity” homeostatic principle [37], subsensitivity of D1-like and D2-like receptors would be adaptive of an excess of presynaptic DA release from the mesolimbic DA system and its hypothalamic innervation [4,5,11]. In other words, in the chronic phase of the disease, long-term DAergic hyperactivity could lead to desensitization of DA receptors. Given this blunting is more often observed in SCZs with positive symptoms, this is also consistent with the “revised DA hypothesis” stating that positive symptoms are associated with DA overactivity in the mesolimbic areas. How to interpret then the hypersensitivity of D1-like and D2-like receptors of GHRH neurons, often found in acute SCZ? A possible explanation would be that, in the acute phase of the disease, excessive DA release results in an overstimulation of the activity of DA receptors. Consistent with this hypothesis, it has been argued that the sensitivity of DA receptors depends on the entire DA neurons’ physiological and regulation mechanisms, including a double stimulation pattern, with a tonic and a phasic activity [38]. Some lines of evidence lead to consider that the tonic stimulation constitutes a background to sensitize the entire DA system to the phasic stimulation. Thus, if the tonic DA tone is increased, the sensitized neurons’ response to DA, or to DA agonists such as APO, is increased too.
The APO–ACTH/cortisol response involves D1-like and D2-like receptors on neurons in the hypothalamus which regulate the release of CRH. Since ACTH and cortisol responses to APO are highly correlated [4,5,11,13], this suggests that cortisol stimulation by APO, despite localization of DA-D2 receptors in the adrenal gland, is secondary to that of ACTH. Moreover, it seems unlikely that reduced APO-induced ACTH/cortisol stimulation is due to decreased reserve of pituitary ACTH or residual antipsychotic effect. Thus, the blunted ACTH/cortisol response often observed in paranoid SCZs, but not in disorganized SCZs, may be related to functional impairment of post-synaptic D1-like and/or D2-like receptors secondary to enhanced synaptic DA transmission at the hypothalamic level. Although there is a relationship between ACTH/cortisol and GH responses, in both SCZs and HCs [11,36], the effect of APO on ACTH/cortisol involves different pathways from those of GH—in addition to their respective releasing hormones, other neurotransmitters/hormones such as acetylcholine, norepinephrine, serotonin, GABA, ghrelin and cholecystokinin are also involved to varying degrees in the GH response to APO [13].

3.4. Apomorphine as a Psychopharmacological Tool

APO has a long history of use in preclinical and clinical drug studies [7]. The hormonal responses to APO make it possible to evaluate in vivo the mechanisms of action of different antipsychotic compounds on the hypothalamic–pituitary DA receptors (Figure 3).
  • NLs block D2 receptors leading to hyperprolactinemia [39] and a reduction in APO–PRL, GH [40,41] and ACTH/cortisol responses [41] (Figure 3a).
  • Clozapine, which bind more “loosely” than DA to D2 receptors and dissociate more rapidly from D2 receptors than “thightly” bound antipsychotic drugs (i.e., NLs, risperidone) [42], slightly increases PRL [40,41], and has no significant effect on the APO–PRL, GH [41,43] and ACTH/cortisol responses [43] (Figure 3b).
  • DA partial agonists, which bind tightly to D2 receptors but have lower intrinsic activity than full agonists [44], decrease PRL secretion via an intrinsic DA agonist action and block—like NLs, APO–PRL, GH and ACTH/cortisol responses [41]—via occupancy of D2 receptors (Figure 3c). Moreover, when aripiprazole (a high-affinity D2 receptor partial agonist [45]) is added (fixed dose 10 mg/d during 2 weeks) to ongoing antipsychotic therapy (with NLs or risperidone) in SCZs, PRL levels drop to normal levels, while the APO–PRL, GH, and ACTH/cortisol responses are not modified significantly [46] (Figure 3d). These latter results suggest that antipsychotics could be partially displaced from hypothalamic–pituitary D2 receptors by aripiprazole [47].

4. Discussion

From this review of the literature on the use of the APO challenge test in schizophrenic patients one may retain the following:
  • Administered subcutaneously, APO, a short-acting DA receptor agonist, indirectly assesses—via the magnitude of induced hormonal responses—hypothalamic–pituitary DA receptor activity, at a given moment in the evolution of the disease, which results from both etiopathogenic processes and compensatory homeostatic mechanisms.
  • Used in a clinical context, the APO test makes it possible to characterize the sensitivity of the DA receptors of different subgroups of patients: e.g., acute SCZs exhibit frequently higher GH responses than chronic SCZs (suggesting DA receptors’ hypersensitivity at the hypothalamic level); paranoid SCZs often show decreased ACTH/cortisol responses than disorganized SCZs (suggesting hyposensitivity of DA receptors connected to the HPA axis). However, to be pathophysiologically valid, the assessment of DA function requires controlling for the bias of insufficient antipsychotic withdrawal [4]. As it is now rare to have the possibility of evaluating hospitalized SCZs naïve to psychotropic drugs, this is probably the major limiting factor for the use of the APO test in the clinical field—this issue is, however, common to all exploration techniques in psychiatry. Another important point is the impact that the dose of APO administered can have on the evaluation of DA receptors in SCZ. Using 0.75mg SC, APO stimulates not only GH but also ACTH and cortisol secretion. APO-induced ACTH/cortisol secretion is consistently blunted in SCZs—particularly in paranoid SCZs—suggesting hyposensitivity of D1/D2-like receptors that may be adaptive to increased presynaptic DA release from the DA mesolimbic projections at the hypothalamic level. This blunting cannot be demonstrated with 0.5 mg of APO, since 0.75 mg is the minimum dose that stimulates ACTH secretion. Conversely, 0.5 mg might be more appropriate for demonstrating DA receptor hypersensitivity (often reported in acute SCZs) since 0.75 mg overstimulates DA receptors compared to 0.5 mg.
  • Used as a psychopharmacological tool, APO is a relevant agent in the “in vivo” evaluation of the mechanisms of action of antipsychotic compounds since distinct specific response profiles characterize antipsychotic drugs based on their activity at D2 receptors.
  • Nevertheless, the predictive value of the APO test in the subsequent response to antipsychotic treatment remains controversial owing to the small number of studies on this topic having produced conflicting or unreplicated results. To date, no studies have examined the predictive value of APO responses to partial D2 agonist drugs, whereas the therapeutic response to these compounds is likely influenced by the basal functionality of central D2 receptors.
Future research should determine the predictive value of the APO challenge test in order to rationalize the choice of pharmacotherapy by taking into account not only the clinical features but also the “biological state” as it can influence the therapeutic response. Better characterizing this state, by complementary paraclinical investigations such as the APO test, is therefore a major challenge in the context of “personalized medicine” for schizophrenia.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van Rossum, J.M. The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1966, 160, 492–494. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Guillin, O.; Abi-Dargham, A.; Laruelle, M. Neurobiology of dopamine in schizophrenia. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2007, 78, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Meltzer, H.Y.; Kolakowska, T.; Fang, V.S.; Fogg, L.; Robertson, A.; Lewine, R.; Strahilevitz, M.; Busch, D. Growth hormone and prolactin response to apomorphine in schizophrenia and the major affective disorders. Relation to duration of illness and depressive symptoms. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1984, 41, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mokrani, M.C.; Duval, F.; Crocq, M.A.; Bailey, P.E.; Macher, J.P. Multihormonal response to apomorphine in mental illness. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1995, 20, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Erb, A.; Danila, V.; Gonzalez Lopera, F.; Jeanjean, L. Dopaminergic, noradrenergic, adrenal, and thyroid abnormalities in psychotic and affective disorders. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 533872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jezova, D.; Vigas, M. Apomorphine injection stimulates beta-endorphin, adrenocorticotropin, and cortisol release in healthy man. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1988, 13, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lal, S. Apomorphine in the evaluation of dopaminergic function in man. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 1988, 12, 117–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Müller-Spahn, F.; Ackenheil, M.; Albus, M.; May, G.; Naber, D.; Welter, D.; Zander, K. Neuroendocrine effects of apomorphine in chronic schizophrenic patients under long-term neuroleptic therapy and after drug withdrawal: Relations to psychopathology and tardive dyskinesia. Psychopharmacology 1984, 84, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Müller-Spahn, F.; Modell, S.; Ackenheil, M.; Brachner, A.; Kurtz, G. Elevated response of growth hormone to graded doses of apomorphine in schizophrenic patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1998, 32, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Crocq, M.A.; Bailey, P.E.; Diep, T.S.; Correa, H.; Macher, J.P. Dopaminergic function and the cortisol response to dexamethasone in psychotic depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2000, 24, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meltzer, H.Y.; Lee, M.A.; Jayathilake, K. The blunted plasma cortisol response to apomorphine and its relationship to treatment response in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001, 24, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Monreal, J.; Bailey, P.; Valdebenito, M.; Crocq, M.A.; Macher, J.P. Dopamine and serotonin function in untreated schizophrenia: Clinical correlates of the apomorphine and d-fenfluramine tests. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2003, 28, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ettigi, P.; Nair, N.P.; Lal, S.; Cervantes, P.; Guyda, H. Effect of apomorphine on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in schizophrenic patients, with or without oral dyskinesia, withdrawn from chronic neuroleptic therapy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1976, 39, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rotrosen, J.; Angrist, B.; Clark, C.; Gershon, S.; Halpers, F.S.; Sachar, E.J. Suppression of prolactin by dopamine agonists in schizophrenics and controls. Am. J. Psychiatry 1978, 135, 949–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pandey, G.N.; Garver, D.L.; Tamminga, C.; Ericksen, S.; Ali, S.I.; Davis, J.M. Postsynaptic supersensitivity in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 1977, 134, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rotrosen, J.; Angrist, B.; Gershon, S.; Paquin, J.; Branchey, L.; Oleshansky, M.; Halpern, F.; Sachar, E.J. Neuroendocrine effects of apomorphine: Characterization of response patterns and application to schizophrenia research. Br. J. Psychiatry 1979, 135, 444–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meltzer, H.Y.; Perline, R.; Lewine, R. Biological studies of DSM-III psychotic disorders. I. Platelet measures and apomorphine-induced growth hormone response. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1982, 170, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cleghorn, J.M.; Brown, G.M.; Brown, P.J.; Kaplan, R.D.; Mitton, J. Growth hormone responses to graded doses of apomorphine HCl in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 1983, 18, 875–885. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cleghorn, J.M.; Brown, G.M.; Brown, P.J.; Kaplan, R.D.; Dermer, S.W.; MacCrimmon, D.J.; Mitton, J. Growth hormone responses to apomorphine HCl in schizophrenic patients on drug holidays and at relapse. Br. J. Psychiatry 1983, 142, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Whalley, L.J.; Christie, J.E.; Brown, S.; Arbuthnott, G.W. Schneider’s first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia. An association with increased growth hormone response to apomorphine. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1984, 41, 1040–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hitzemann, R.; Hirschowitz, J.; Hitzemann, B.; Garver, D. The prolactin response in schizophrenic, schizophreniform, and manic disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 1984, 19, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Ferrier, I.N.; Johnstone, E.C.; Crow, T.J. Hormonal effects of apomorphine in schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry 1984, 144, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Davis, B.M.; Davis, K.L.; Mohs, R.C.; Mathé, A.A.; Rothpearl, A.B.; Johns, C.A.; Levy, M.I.; Horvath, T.B. Evaluating prolactin response to dopamine agonists in schizophrenia. Methodological problems. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1985, 42, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zemlan, F.P.; Hirschowitz, J.; Sautter, F.; Garver, D.L. Relationship of psychotic symptom clusters in schizophrenia to neuroleptic treatment and growth hormone response to apomorphine. Psychiatry Res. 1986, 18, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hirschowitz, J.; Zemlan, F.P.; Hitzemann, R.J.; Fleischmann, R.L.; Garver, D.L. Growth hormone response to apomorphine and diagnosis: A comparison of three diagnostic systems. Biol. Psychiatry 1986, 21, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Malas, K.L.; van Kammen, D.P.; de Fraites, E.A.; Brown, G.M.; Gold, P.W. Reduced growth hormone response to apomorphine in schizophrenic patients with poor premorbid social functioning. J. Neural Transm. 1987, 69, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, G.M.; Cleghorn, J.M.; Kaplan, R.D.; Szechtman, H.; Brown, P.J.; Szechtman, B.; Mitton, J. Longitudinal growth hormone studies in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1988, 24, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Legros, J.J.; Gazzotti, C.; Carvelli, T.; Franchimont, P.; Timsit-Berthier, M.; von Frenckell, R.; Ansseau, M. Apomorphine stimulation of vasopressin- and oxytocin-neurophysins. Evidence for increased oxytocinergic and decreased vasopressinergic function in schizophrenics. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1992, 17, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lieberman, J.A.; Jody, D.; Alvir, J.M.; Ashtari, M.; Levy, D.L.; Bogerts, B.; Degreef, G.; Mayerhoff, D.I.; Cooper, T. Brain morphology, dopamine, and eye-tracking abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia. Prevalence and clinical correlates. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1993, 50, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brambilla, F.; Marini, S.; Saito, A.; Fassone, G.; Picardi, A.; Nerozzi, D.; Pancheri, P. Noradrenergic and dopaminergic interrelation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1994, 53, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rotrosen, J.; Angrist, B.M.; Gershon, S.; Sachar, E.J.; Halpern, F.S. Dopamine receptor alteration in schizophrenia: Neuroendocrine evidence. Psychopharmacology 1976, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lieberman, J.A.; Kane, J.M.; Safferman, A.Z.; Pollack, S.; Howard, A.; Szymanski, S.; Masiar, S.J.; Kronig, M.H.; Cooper, T.; Novacenko, H. Predictors of response to clozapine. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1994, 55, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hirschowitz, J.; Zemlan, F.P.; Garver, D. L Growth hormone levels and lithium ratios as predictors of success of lithium therapy in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 1982, 139, 646–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Crocq, M.A.; Bailey, P.; Diep, T.S.; Correa, H.; Macher, J.P. Neuroendocrine profiles of schizophrenic, schizoaffective, and depressed patients: Clinical, pathophysiological, and therapeutic implications. In The Bio-clinical Interface: Neurosciences and Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Biology; Macher, J.P., Crocq, M.A., Nedelec, J.F., Eds.; Springer: Rouffach, France, 1997; pp. 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kvernmo, T.; Hartter, S.; Burger, E. A review of the receptor-binding and pharmacokinetic properties of dopamine agonists. Clin. Ther. 2006, 28, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Biswas, D.; Iglesias, P.A. Biol Cybern. Sensitivity minimization, biological homeostasis and information theory. Biol. Cybern. 2021, 115, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Grace, A.A. Dysregulation of the dopamine system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and depression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Besnard, I.; Auclair, V.; Callery, G.; Gabriel-Bordenave, C.; Roberge, C. Antipsychotic-drug-induced hyperprolactinemia: Physiopathology, clinical features and guidance. Encephale 2014, 40, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kolakowska, T.; Gelder, M.; Fraser, S. Neuroendocrine tests during treatment with neuroleptic drugs. III. Plasma growth hormone and prolactin responses to apomorphine. Br. J. Psychiatry 1981, 139, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Macher, J.P.; Crocq, M.A.; Castro, J.O.; Bailey, P.; Lataste, X. Neuroendocrine profile of SDZ HDC-912 and OPC-4392, two new atypical antipsychotic drugs, in schizophrenic patients. Psychopharmacology 1993, 110, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seeman, P. Targeting the dopamine D2 receptor in schizophrenia. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2006, 10, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Crocq, M.A.; Bailey, P.; Diep, T.S.; Andrade, E.E.; Macher, J.P. Neuroendocrine profiles of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 1994, 35, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lieberman, J.A. Dopamine partial agonists: A new class of antipsychotic. CNS Drugs 2004, 18, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Bartolomeis, A.; Tomasetti, C.; Iasevoli, F. Update on the mechanism of action of aripiprazole: Translational insights into antipsychotic strategies beyond dopamine receptor antagonism. CNS Drugs 2015, 29, 773–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Duval, F.; Mokrani, M.C.; Gonzalez Lopera, F.; Diep, T.S.; Braccini Pereira, P. Effect of aripiprazole addition to antipsychotic treatment on dopaminergic activity in schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 63, S129. [Google Scholar]
  47. Citrome, L. A review of aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2006, 2, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 11 01487 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of hypothalamic–pituitary regulation by dopamine (DA) and neuroendocrine targets of the apomorphine test. Apomorphine (administered subcutaneously) stimulates directly D2 receptors (D2R) of pituitary lactotrophs which inhibits the release of prolactin, and stimulates, via agonization of D1-like and D2-like receptors (D1/2R) at the hypothalamic level, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)—this latter stimulation requires a larger dose of apomorphine (≥0.75 mg) to be significant. Then, at the pituitary level, are stimulated growth hormone (GH), via GHRH receptors, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), via CRH1 receptors. Additionally, ACTH stimulates the release of cortisol from the adrenal gland. The role of D2 receptors on GH and ACTH secretion at the pituitary level remains to be elucidated since they probably inhibit GH and ACTH release; this partly counteracts the stimulation operated by GHRH and CRH. On the other hand, PRL is tonically suppressed by DA originating from the tuberoinfundibular tract (TIDA). Via a short-loop feedback circuit, PRL stimulates TIDA neurons, resulting in an inhibition of its own secretion. An ultra-short feedback loop is provided by D2 autoreceptors that decrease the activity of TIDA neurons, maintaining stable homeostasis according to the ambient extracellular levels of DA.
Figure 1. Overview of hypothalamic–pituitary regulation by dopamine (DA) and neuroendocrine targets of the apomorphine test. Apomorphine (administered subcutaneously) stimulates directly D2 receptors (D2R) of pituitary lactotrophs which inhibits the release of prolactin, and stimulates, via agonization of D1-like and D2-like receptors (D1/2R) at the hypothalamic level, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)—this latter stimulation requires a larger dose of apomorphine (≥0.75 mg) to be significant. Then, at the pituitary level, are stimulated growth hormone (GH), via GHRH receptors, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), via CRH1 receptors. Additionally, ACTH stimulates the release of cortisol from the adrenal gland. The role of D2 receptors on GH and ACTH secretion at the pituitary level remains to be elucidated since they probably inhibit GH and ACTH release; this partly counteracts the stimulation operated by GHRH and CRH. On the other hand, PRL is tonically suppressed by DA originating from the tuberoinfundibular tract (TIDA). Via a short-loop feedback circuit, PRL stimulates TIDA neurons, resulting in an inhibition of its own secretion. An ultra-short feedback loop is provided by D2 autoreceptors that decrease the activity of TIDA neurons, maintaining stable homeostasis according to the ambient extracellular levels of DA.
Healthcare 11 01487 g001
Healthcare 11 01487 g002 550
Figure 2. Flowchart of study selection process, adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2020) [8].
Figure 2. Flowchart of study selection process, adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2020) [8].
Healthcare 11 01487 g002
Healthcare 11 01487 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of antipsychotics on the apomorphine (APO) test responses (0.75 mg SC). After a drug-free baseline period of at least 2 weeks (Day 0), schizophrenic patients (SCZs) received (a) amisulpride (n = 15, mean dose/day ± SD, 1247 ± 636 mg at day 28) [41]; or (b) clozapine (n = 7, 454 ± 10 mg) [43]; or (c) DA partial agonists: SDZ HDC-912 (n = 11, 4.0 ± 3.9 mg), OPC-4392 (n = 10, 17.2 ± 12.6 mg) [41]. In another experiment, aripiprazole (d) (10 mg/d) was added to ongoing antipsychotic (AP) treatment in 10 SCZs (see text) [46]. PRL, prolactin; Supp, % suppression from PRL baseline (BL) after APO injection; ∆ACTH, maximum adrenocorticotropin hormone increment from BL; ∆COR, maximum cortisol increment from BL; ∆GH maximum growth hormone increment from BL. Comparisons between baseline to endpoint, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 (by Wilcoxon two-tailed signed rank test for paired samples).
Figure 3. Effects of antipsychotics on the apomorphine (APO) test responses (0.75 mg SC). After a drug-free baseline period of at least 2 weeks (Day 0), schizophrenic patients (SCZs) received (a) amisulpride (n = 15, mean dose/day ± SD, 1247 ± 636 mg at day 28) [41]; or (b) clozapine (n = 7, 454 ± 10 mg) [43]; or (c) DA partial agonists: SDZ HDC-912 (n = 11, 4.0 ± 3.9 mg), OPC-4392 (n = 10, 17.2 ± 12.6 mg) [41]. In another experiment, aripiprazole (d) (10 mg/d) was added to ongoing antipsychotic (AP) treatment in 10 SCZs (see text) [46]. PRL, prolactin; Supp, % suppression from PRL baseline (BL) after APO injection; ∆ACTH, maximum adrenocorticotropin hormone increment from BL; ∆COR, maximum cortisol increment from BL; ∆GH maximum growth hormone increment from BL. Comparisons between baseline to endpoint, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 (by Wilcoxon two-tailed signed rank test for paired samples).
Healthcare 11 01487 g003
Table
Table 1. Hormonal responses to apomorphine in schizophrenic patients.
Table 1. Hormonal responses to apomorphine in schizophrenic patients.
ReferencePopulation StudiedAPO DoseMain Findings
Ettigi et al. [14]
(1976)		17 chronic SCZs
21 HCs		0.75 mg SCNo difference in PRL suppression
Lower GH stimulation in chronic SCZs
Rotrosen et al. [15]
(1978)		22 chronic SCZs
9 HCs		0.5 mg SCBlunted PRL suppression in chronic SCZs.
Bimodal distribution of peak GH in SCZs
Pandey et al. [16]
(1977)		9 acute SCZs
16 chronic SCZs
8 HCs		0.75 mg SCHigher GH responses in acute SCZs than in HCs and chronic SCZs.
Chronic SCZs had non-significant reduced GH responses than HCs.
Rotrosen et al. [17]
(1979)		25 SCZs
16 HCs		0.5 mg SCBlunted GH responses in chronic SCZs.
Exaggerated GH responses in acute SCZs.
Meltzer et al. [18]
(1982)		14 SCZs
8 SADs
16 HCs		0.75 mg SCNo difference in GH responses across groups.
Cleghorn et al. [19]
(1983)		10 SCZs
14 HCs		Graded doses
(0.1 to 0.75 mg SC)		Increased GH responses with lower doses of APO in SCZs with positive symptoms of psychosis.
Cleghorn et al. [20]
(1983)		9 SCZs
9 HCs		0.75 mg SCExaggerated GH responses in SCZs prior to relapse.
Whalley et al. [21]
(1984)		19 SCZs
9 HCs		0.75 mg SCHigher PRL suppression in SCZs than in HCs.
Greater GH responses in SCZs with Schneider’s first-rank symptoms than in those without and HCs.
Meltzer et al. [3]
(1984)		40 SCZs
56 non-SCZs
16 HCs		0.75 mg SCNo difference in PRL suppression and GH stimulation across groups.
Postive correlation between GH peak and negative symptoms in SCZs.
Müller-Spahn et al. [9]
(1984)		11 chronic SCZs
11 HCs		0.5 mg SCHigher GH response in HCs and SCZs after a 12-day drug-free period than in SCZs treated with NL.
Hitzemann et al. [22]
(1984)		16 SCZs
13 SzDs		0.75 mg SCNo difference in PRL suppression.
Ferrier et al. [23]
(1984)		30 SCZs
10 HCs		0.75 mg SCBlunted GH responses in chronic SCZs.
No difference in PRL suppression.
Davis et al. [24]
(1985)		38 chronic SCZs
19 HCs		0.75 mg SCLower PRL suppression in SCZs than in HCs.
Zemlan et al. [25]
(1986)		138 SCZs-SADs
10 HCs		0.75 mg SCHigher GH responses in acute SCZs than in HCs and chronic SCZs.
Hirschowitz et al. [26]
(1986)		71 SCZs-SADs-BDs
15 HCs		0.75 mg SCIncreased GH in SADs vs. BDs and SCZs.
Malas et al. [27]
(1987)		16 SCZs
9 HCs		0.75 mg SCLower GH response in SCZs with poor premorbid psychosial functioning than HCs.
Brown et al [28]
(1988)		12 SCZs
19 HCs		0.75 mg SCNo difference in GH responses.
Lower GH response averaged over 12 trials in 5 SCZs vs. 5 HCs during longitudinal assessment (22 months).
Legros et al [29]
(1992)		9 male SCZs
14 male HCs		0.5 mg SCNo difference in GH response.
Lieberman et al. [30]
(1993)		70 acute SCZs
50 HCs		0.75 mg SCAbnormal GH response in half of SCZs. Decreased GH response correlated with third ventricle enlargement.
Brambilla et al [31]
(1994)		20 chronic and subchronic SCZs
9 HCs		0.5 mg SCNo difference in GH and PRL responses.
However, blunted GH response. correlated with chronicity of the disorder.
Negative symptoms correlated positively and positive symptoms correlated negatively with PRL responses.
Mokrani et al. [4]
(1995)		46 SCZs
14 SADs
50 MDEs
18 HCs		0.75 mg SCLower ACTH and cortisol responses in SCZs and SADs vs. HCs and MDEs.
Blunted GH responses (∆GH < 4 ng/mL) more frequent in SCZs than in MDEs.
No difference in PRL suppression across groups, although BDs had lower values than MDEs.
Müller-Spahn et al. [10]
(1998)		16 male acute SCZs
12 male HCs		3 dosagesHigher GH response in SCZs vs. HCs using 0.006 mg/kg SC APO, but not with 0.003 mg/kg and 0.012 mg/kg, suggesting increased DA receptor sensitivity in the hypothalamic–pituitary system in SCZs.
Duval et al. [11]
(2000)		41 paranoid SCZs
74 MDEs
35 MDEPs
27 HCs		0.75 mg SCLower ACTH responses and higher rate of blunted GH responses in paranoid SCZs vs. HCs, MDEs, and MDEPs.
No difference in PRL suppression across groups.
Meltzer et al. [12]
(2001)		51–98 SCZs
15–25 HCs		0.01 mg/kg SCBlunted cortisol response in SCZs
Blunted GH, but not PRL, response in male SCZs.
Duval et al. [13]
(2003)		20 SCZs
23 HCs		0.75 mg SCReduced ACTH and cortisol responses significantly more frequent in paranoid SCZs (n = 12) vs. disorganized SCZs (n = 8) and HCs.
No difference in PRL suppression across groups.
Duval et al. [5]
(2020)		13 male paranoid SCZs
13 male SADs
13 male BDs (depressed)
13 HCs		0.75 mg SCLower ACTH and cortisol stimulation in SCZs compared to HCs, but no difference in PRL suppression vs. other groups.
There was a trend towards increased frequency of blunted GH response in SCZs.
APO, apomorphine; GH, growth hormone, PRL, prolactin, ACTH, adrenocorticotropin hormone; HCs, healthy control subjects; SCZs, schizophrenic patients; SzDs, patients with schizophreniform disorder; SADs, patients with schizoaffective disorder; BDs, patients with bipolar disorder; MDEs, patients with a major depressive episode; MDEPs, patients with a major depressive episode with psychotic features.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duval, F. Systematic Review of the Apomorphine Challenge Test in the Assessment of Dopaminergic Activity in Schizophrenia. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101487

AMA Style

Duval F. Systematic Review of the Apomorphine Challenge Test in the Assessment of Dopaminergic Activity in Schizophrenia. Healthcare. 2023; 11(10):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duval, Fabrice. 2023. "Systematic Review of the Apomorphine Challenge Test in the Assessment of Dopaminergic Activity in Schizophrenia" Healthcare 11, no. 10: 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop