STEM Education in Australia: Impediments and Solutions in Achieving a STEM-Ready Workforce
2. Impediments to STEM Learning
2.1. A Contested Definition
2.2. Uncertainty of What STEM Skills Are Required
2.3. Problem or Inquiry-Based Approaches in STEM Learning
2.4. Who Should Be Teaching STEM
2.5. Contested Cross-Disciplinary STEM Pedagogies
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
- Education Council. National STEM School Education Strategy, 2016–2026. 2015. Available online: https://www.education.gov.au/national-stem-school-education-strategy-2016-2026 (accessed on 6 May 2021).
- Australian Government. Australia’s National Science Statement. 2017. Available online: http://www.science.gov.au/scienceGov/NationalScienceStatement/National-science-statement.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- Australian Government. Innovation and Creativity Report. 2017. Available online: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Employment_Education_and_Training/Innovationandcreativity/Report_-_Innovation_and_creativity (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- Office of the Chief Scientist. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the National Interest: A Strategic Approach; Australian Government: Canberra, Australia, 2013.
- Stewart, G. Physics: Leading the way in STEM education. Phys. Teach. 2013, 51, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, B.; Marginson, S.; Tytler, R. Widening and deepening the STEM effect. In The Age of STEM—Educational Policy and Practice Across the World in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics; Freeman, B., Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 23–43. [Google Scholar]
- Price, Waterhouse & Coopers. A Smart Move: Future-proofing Australia’s workforce by growing skills in STEM. 2015. Available online: https://www.pwc.com.au/publications/a-smart-move.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- Green, A. The Integration of Engineering Design Projects into the Secondary Science Classroom. Master’s Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Mattern, K.; Radunzel, J.; Westrick, P. Development of STEM Readiness Benchmarks to Assist Educational and Career Decision Making; ACT Research Report Series, 2015; ACT, Inc.: Iowa City, IA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Department for Education and Child Development. STEM Learning: Strategy for DECD Preschool to year 12. 2016. Available online: https://www.education.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/decd-stem-strategy-2016.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority. ACARA Stem Connections Project Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/stem/stem-report/ (accessed on 2 March 2021).
- Moore, T.J.; Stohlmann, M.S.; Wang, H.H.; Tank, K.M.; Glancy, A.W.; Roehrig, G.H. Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices; Purdue University Press: West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2014; pp. 35–60. [Google Scholar]
- Bybee, R.W. What is STEM education? Science 2010, 329, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Sanders, M.E. STEM, STEM Education, STEMania. Education. Technol. Teach. 2009, 68, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- English, L.D. STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2016, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Breiner, J.M.; Harkness, S.S.; Johnson, C.C.; Koehler, C.M. What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. Sch. Sci. Math. 2012, 112, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honey, M.; Pearson, G.; Schweingruber, H. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Office of the Chief Scientist. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: Australia’s Future; Australian Government: Canberra, Australia, 2014.
- Carnevale, A.P.; Desrochers, D.M. The Missing Middle: Aligning Education and the Knowledge Economy. J. Vocat. Spec. Needs Educ. 2002, 25, 3–23. [Google Scholar]
- National Science Board. Revisiting the STEM Workforce: A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014; National Science Board: Arlington, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ismail, Z. Benefits of STEM Education; K4D Helpdesk Report; International Development Department: Birmingham, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Crisp, G.; Teacher’s Handbook on e-Assessment. Transforming Assessment-An ALTC Fellowship Activity, 18. 2011. Available online: http://www.bezaspeaks.com/eassessmentafrica/Handbook_for_teachers.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Orpwood, G.W.; Schmidt, B.A.; Jun, H. Competing in the 21st Century Skills Race; Canadian Council of Chief Executives: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Siekmann, G.; Korbel, P. Defining ‘STEM’ skills: Review and synthesis of the literature-support document 1, NVVER, Adelaide. 2016. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570655 (accessed on 3 July 2021).
- OECD. PISA 2015, Draft Collaborative Problem Solving Framework, PISA; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians; MCEETYA: Carlton South, VIC, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Van de Oudeweetering, K.; Voogt, J. Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first century competences: Exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curric. J. 2018, 29, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Office of the Chief Scientist. Australia STEM’s Workforce; Australian Government: Canberra, Australia, 2016.
- Blackley, S.; Howell, J. A STEM Narrative: 15 Years in the Making. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 2015, 40, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mayer, R.E. Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? Am. Psychol. 2004, 59, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Kirschner, P.A.; Sweller, J.; Clark, R. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based teaching. Educ. Psychol. 2016, 41, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klahr, D.; Nigam, M. The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alfieri, L.; Brooks, P.J.; Aldrich, N.J.; Tenenbaum, H.R. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 103, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Tobias, S.; Duffy, T.M. Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure? Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sweller, J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 1988, 12, 257–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweller, J.; Chandler, P. Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory. Cogn. Instr. 1991, 8, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehrer, R.; Schauble, L. Stepping Carefully: Thinking Through the Potential Pitfalls of Integrated STEM. J. STEM Educ. Res. 2021, 4, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. Promoting the Development of Interdisciplinary Research in STEM Education. J. STEM Educ. Res. 2018, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Burrows, A.; Slater, T. A proposed integrated STEM framework for Contemporary Teacher preparation. Teach. Educ. Pract. 2015, 28, 318–330. [Google Scholar]
- STEM Task Force Report. Innovate: A Blueprint for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education; Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation: Dublin, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Vasquez, J.A.; Sneider, C.; Comer, M. STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3–8: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics; Heinemann: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Goeke, J.L.; Ciotoli, F. Restructuring Preservice Preparation for Inclusive iSTEM Education. Teach. Educ. Pract. 2015, 28, 393–411. [Google Scholar]
- Nadelson, L.S.; Seifert, A.; Moll, A.J.; Coats, B. i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. J. STEM Educ. Innov. Outreach 2012, 105, 220–231. [Google Scholar]
- Herschbach, D.R. The STEM Initiative: Constraints and Challenges. J. STEM Teach. Educ. 2011, 48, 96–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, M.E. Integrative STEM education as “best practice”. In Explorations of Best Practice in Technology, Design and Engineering Education, 2; Middleton, H., Ed.; Griffith Institute for Educational Research: Queensland, Australia, 2021; pp. 103–107. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Bentley, B.; Sieben, R.; Unsworth, P. STEM Education in Australia: Impediments and Solutions in Achieving a STEM-Ready Workforce. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100730
Bentley B, Sieben R, Unsworth P. STEM Education in Australia: Impediments and Solutions in Achieving a STEM-Ready Workforce. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(10):730. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100730Chicago/Turabian Style
Bentley, Brendan, Rob Sieben, and Paul Unsworth. 2022. "STEM Education in Australia: Impediments and Solutions in Achieving a STEM-Ready Workforce" Education Sciences 12, no. 10: 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100730