# Redistribution of Energy during Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Temperature Layered Plasma Region at Hypersonic Speeds

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Numerical Method and Statement of the Problem

_{1}= 0.41 (120K) was used. It was assumed that the coefficient of thermal conductivity k depends on temperature as

^{0.5}.

_{n}= 0.01205 kg/m

^{3}and p

_{n}= 1013.25 Pa, and the Reynolds number Re = 9500 corresponds to the conditions of the experiments in [24].

_{s}= αρ

_{∞}. Here, the parameter α characterizes the medium rarefaction, α < 1. The pressure in the source layers was equal to its undisturbed value, so, the temperature was increased in these layers. The gaps between the layers had a width equal to a half of a layer width. Below, for brevity, such a heated area is referred to as an energy source. This heated area is set at the initial time instant at some distance from the shock wave (SW), x

_{sw}is the initial shock wave coordinate, and x

_{s}is the stratified energy source boundary coordinate (Figure 1a).

^{6}nodes in the calculation area, counting the central node). Location of the stratified energy source on difference grid in enlarged form is presented in Figure 1b,c.

## 3. Analysis of the Grid Convergence

_{max}, calculated on these four difference grids, are also quite close (Figure 2b). These facts indicate the presence of grid convergence for the considered grids. Note that we used the finest grid (Grid1) for the simulations.

## 4. An Example of the Thermally Layered Gas Media Formation

## 5. Results of the Simulation

_{sw}= 1.5 and the stratified energy source boundary coordinate x

_{s}= 1.4.

_{max}in the obtained shock-wave structures is presented for different rarefaction parameters α for all considered Mach numbers of the shock wave. Here, the maximum value of the internal energy is calculated over the coordinates in the region of the obtained shock-wave structure with instabilities. This value has a sense of the greatest local increase in the internal energy due to the formation of such a structure as a result of the action of a stratified energy source. It can be seen that these dependences have maxima on t at the beginning stage of the interaction. These maximum values are larger for smaller α and for larger M. Figure 11 shows these dependencies for different M for all considered α. It can be seen that at the first stage, the dynamics of ε

_{max}is changing stronger for smaller α and larger M. Note that fluctuations in internal energy are directly connected with fluctuations in the temperature of the gas in the flow, therefore, from the results shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11, similar conclusions follow for the gas temperature [25].

_{max}in the obtained unstable shock-wave structures. This value has a sense of the greatest local increase in the kinetic energy due to the formation of a shock-wave structure as a result of the use of a stratified energy source. In Figure 12, the dependences E

_{max}(t) are presented for different rarefaction parameter α for the considered shock wave’s Mach numbers. One can see that the dependences have maxima on t which are larger for larger α and larger M. Figure 13 shows these dependencies for different M for all considered α It can be seen from these dependences that the growth of the kinetic energy occurs quicker for larger α and larger M.

_{sw}= 1.5 and the source boundary coordinate x

_{s}= 1.4. For the study of kinetic energy, this time interval turned out to be not enough (because its maximum value is reached at the middle stage in time). Here, we used a different geometry of the calculation domain with the position of the shock wave x

_{sw}= 2.25 and the boundary of the energy source x

_{s}= 2.15 with the same vertical dimensions. This made it possible to study the time history of kinetic energy in the time interval up to t = 0.25 for the considered shock wave Mach numbers.

_{i}and N

_{j}—the amounts of grid nodes in i- and j-directions, ε

_{averaged}and ε

_{h averaged}are the averaged values of internal energy in the stratified and homogeneous sources, accordingly.

_{h}and E

_{h}are close to constant.

_{ε}and in the kinetic energy η

_{E}are evaluated as follows:

_{h}and E

_{h}are the values inside the region between the shock wave and contact discontinuity. The values η

_{ε}and η

_{E}have the meaning of the maximum relative difference of the considered types of energy over time between their values for stratified and homogeneous energy sources.

_{ε}and η

_{E}on the rarefaction parameter α are presented for the considered Mach numbers. It is seen that the relative deviation in the local peaks of ε can achieve up to 29% (for M = 6, α = 0.1) and increases with decreasing α and M (Figure 15a). The relative deviation in the local peaks of E can achieve up to 8.3 times (for M = 6, α = 0.1) and also increases with decreasing α and M (Figure 15b). It should be pointed out that this value depends on the temperature of the layers in the energy source, more so than on the Mach number of the shock wave. Note that the difference in the behavior of η

_{ε}for M = 6 and for M = 8–10 is connected with a different location of the maximum value ε

_{max}in the considered shock-wave structures.

## 6. Manifestation of the Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability

## 7. Conclusions

- The use of stratified energy sources gives the possibility to redistribute the energy behind the shock wave front in such a way that results in the distortion or complete disappearance of the shock wave fronts (in density fields).
- The mechanism of shock wave blurring is associated with multiple manifestations of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities.
- The use of stratified energy sources gives the possibility to obtain the local zones of specific internal energy and volume kinetic energy behind the shock wave with the relative difference exceeding up to 29% and 8.3 times, accordingly, these values for the homogeneous energy source with the same total energy; these relative differences increase with decreasing α and M.
- The dependences of specific internal energy have maxima on t at the beginning stage of the interaction which are larger for smaller α and for larger M, and the internal energy is changing more significantly for these α and M. The dependences of kinetic energy have maxima on t which are larger for larger α and larger M, and the growth of the kinetic energy occurs more quickly for these α and M.
- The values of the considered types of energy in the obtained shock-wave structures can be controlled at hypersonic speeds via the rarefaction parameter (or temperature) in the layers of the stratified energy source.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Knight, D.D. Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; p. 450. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, M.Y.M.; Qin, N. Forebody shock control devices for drag and aero-heating reduction: A comprehensive survey with a practical perspective. Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
**2020**, 112, 100585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Russel, A.; Zare-Bentash, H.; Kontis, K. Joule heating flow control methods for high-speed flows. J. Electrost.
**2016**, 80, 34–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Leonov, S.B. Review of plasma-based methods for high-speed flow control. AIP Conf. Proc.
**2011**, 1376, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kolesnichenko, Y.; Brovkin, V.; Azarova, O.; Grudnitsky, V.; Lashkov, V.; Mashek, I. Microwave energy release regimes for drag reduction in supersonic flows. In Proceedings of the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 14–17 January 2002; Paper AIAA-2002-353. pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tretyakov, P.K.; Fomin, V.M.; Yakovlev, V.I. New principles of control of aerophysical processes—research development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, Novosibirsk, Russia, 29 June–3 July 1996; p. 210. [Google Scholar]
- Myrabo, L.N.; Raizer, Y.P. Laser-induced air spike for advanced transatmospheric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20–23 June 1994. Paper AIAA-1994-2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bityurin, V.A.; Klimov, A.I.; Leonov, S.B.; Potebnya, V.G. On interaction of longitudinal pulse discharge with bow shock. In Proceedings of the Workshop Perspectives of MHD and Plasma Technologies in Aerospace Applications, IVTAN, Moscow, Russia, 24–25 March 1999; pp. 114–119. [Google Scholar]
- Roupassov, D.; Nikipelov, A.; Nudnova, M.; Starikovsky, A. Flow separation control by plasma actuator with nanosecond pulsed-periodic discharge. AIAA J.
**2009**, 47, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kourtzanidis, K.; Raja, L.; Coumar, S.; Lago, V. Numerical simulation of DC glow discharges for shock wave modification. In Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 4–8 January 2016; Paper AIAA-2016-2157. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Supersonic flow control via plasma, electric and magnetic impacts. Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
**2017**, 69, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Quan, S.; Bangqin, C.; Yonggui, Y.; Yiwen, L.; Di, J. A study of variation patterns of shock wave control by different plasma aerodynamic actuations. Plasma Sci. Technol.
**2010**, 12, 708–714. [Google Scholar] - Yan, H.; Liu, F.; Xu, J.; Xue, Y. Study of oblique shock wave control by surface arc discharge plasma. AIAA J.
**2018**, 56, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jin, J.; Znamenskaya, I.A.; Sysoev, N.N. Two regimes of pulsed volume discharge action upon a shock wave. Tech. Phys. Lett.
**2013**, 39, 418–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Azarova, O.A. Generation of Richtmyer-Meshkov and secondary instabilities during the interaction of an energy release with a cylinder shock layer. Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
**2015**, 42, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Azarova, O.A. Supersonic flow control using combined energy deposition. Aerospace
**2015**, 2, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Apazidis, N.; Sembian, S.; Liverts, M. Blast wave interaction with thermal and density inhomogeneities in air. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Shock Waves (ISSW32), Singapore, 14–19 July 2019; pp. 1657–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bityurin, V.; Klimov, A.; Leonov, S.; Brovkin, V.; Kolesnichenko, Y.; Popov, N.; Van Wie, D. Shock waves structure and velocity at propagation through non-homogeneous plasma. In Proceedings of the 31st Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 19–22 June 2000. Paper AIAA-2000-2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonov, S.B.; Carter, C.D.; Hedlund, B.E.; Houpt, A.W.; Ombrello, T.; Firsov, A.A. Control of amplitude and position of reflected shock wave by stripwise plasma. In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2018. Paper AIAA-2018-0683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonov, S.; Carter, C.; Houpt, A.; Ombrello, T. Mitigation of reflected shock wave by streamwise plasma array. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), Milan, Italy, 3–6 July 2017; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonov, S.B.; Firsov, A.A.; Houpt, A.W. Suppression of reflected oblique shock wave by multifilamentary plasma. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2018**, 1112, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gan, T.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Jin, D.; Song, H.; Jia, M. Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators. Phys. Fluids
**2018**, 30, 055107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V.; Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. Passage of a plane shock wave through the region of a glow gas discharge. Tech. Phys.
**2019**, 64, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V.; Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. Interaction of a plane shock wave with an area of ionization instability of discharge plasma in air. Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
**2019**, 85, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Density and temperature fluctuations behind a shock wave under the influence of a stratified energy source. Tech. Phys. Lett.
**2020**, 46, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. Impact of a thermally stratified energy source on the bow shock wave and aerodynamic characteristics of a body. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2021**, 1891, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Azarova, O.A.; Krasnobaev, K.V.; Kravchenko, O.V.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Redistribution of energy in a viscous heat-conductive medium during the interaction of a shock wave with a temperature layered plasma region. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2020**, 1698, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roache, P.J. Computational Fluid Dynamics; Mir: Moscow, Russia, 1980; p. 612. [Google Scholar]
- Azarova, O.A. Complex conservative difference schemes for computing supersonic flows past simple aerodynamic forms. J. Comp. Math. Math. Phys.
**2015**, 55, 2025–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Raizer, Y.P. Gas Discharge Physics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; p. 449. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Schematic of the problem statement (

**a**); location of the stratified energy source on difference grid (enlarged) (

**b**); location of one layer of on difference grid (enlarged) (

**c**).

**Figure 2.**Comparison of the calculations on four different grids, M = 8, α = 0.4: (

**a**) isolines of ε, t = 0.12 (

**b**) dynamics of ε

_{max}.

**Figure 3.**Examples of large-scale (

**a**) and small-scale (

**b**) strata of an ionization-unstable discharge.

**Figure 4.**Dynamics of the density field in isochores: M = 8, α = 0.1, t = 0.017, 0.07 and 0.12 (superposed).

**Figure 16.**Manifestation of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities in a case of wider layers, density, M = 3, α = 0.4.

Difference Grid | A Number of Working Nodes in the Calculation Area | The Space Steps Values |
---|---|---|

Grid 1 | 1.6 × 10^{6} | h_{x} = h_{y} = 0.0005 |

Grid 2 | 1.2 × 10^{6} | h_{x} = h_{y} = 0.000571 |

Grid 3 | 0.9 × 10^{6} | h_{x} = h_{y} = 0.000667 |

Grid 4 | 0.63 × 10^{6} | h_{x} = h_{y} = 0.0008 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Azarova, O.A.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Krasnobaev, K.V.; Kravchenko, O.V.
Redistribution of Energy during Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Temperature Layered Plasma Region at Hypersonic Speeds. *Aerospace* **2021**, *8*, 326.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8110326

**AMA Style**

Azarova OA, Lapushkina TA, Krasnobaev KV, Kravchenko OV.
Redistribution of Energy during Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Temperature Layered Plasma Region at Hypersonic Speeds. *Aerospace*. 2021; 8(11):326.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8110326

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Azarova, O. A., T. A. Lapushkina, K. V. Krasnobaev, and O. V. Kravchenko.
2021. "Redistribution of Energy during Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Temperature Layered Plasma Region at Hypersonic Speeds" *Aerospace* 8, no. 11: 326.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8110326