Next Article in Journal
Adapting from Low to High: An Update to CO2-Concentrating Mechanisms of Cyanobacteria and Microalgae
Next Article in Special Issue
Meiotic Behaviors of Allotetraploid Citrus Drive the Interspecific Recombination Landscape, the Genetic Structures, and Traits Inheritance in Tetrazyg Progenies Aiming to Select New Rootstocks
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Carbohydrate Management on Coleoptile Elongation in Anaerobically Germinating Seeds of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Light and Dark Cycles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genotyping by Sequencing for SNP-Based Linkage Analysis and the Development of KASPar Markers for Male Sterility and Polyembryony in Citrus

1
Centro de Citricultura y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), 46113 Valencia, Spain
2
Agrupación de Viveristas de Agrios (AVASA), 12570 Castellón, Spain
3
Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), 46113 Valencia, Spain
4
UMR AGAP, CIRAD, 34398 Montpellier, France
5
UMR AGAP, Institut Agro, CIRAD, INRAE, Université Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(7), 1567; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071567
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics of Citrus)

Abstract

:
Polyembryony and male sterility (MS) are essential characters for citrus breeding. MS, coupled with parthenocarpy, allows for addressing the diversification of diploid seedless mandarin varieties, and nucleocytoplasmic MS is the most prevalent system. Polyembryony limits the use of seed parents in scion breeding programs, and the recovery of monoembryonic hybrids to be used as female parents is a crucial pre-breeding component. The objectives of this work were the identification of SNPs closely linked with the genes implied in these traits for marker-assisted selection. Genotyping by sequencing was used to genotype 61 diploid hybrids from an F1 progeny recovered from crossing ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors. A total of 6444 segregating markers were identified and used to establish the two parental genetic maps. They consisted of 1374 and 697 markers encompassing 1416.287 and 1339.735 cM for ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’, respectively. Phenotyping for MS and polyembryony was performed. The genotype–trait association study identified a genomic region on LG8 which was significantly associated with MS, and a genomic region on LG1 which was significantly associated with polyembryony. Annotation of the identified region for MS revealed 19 candidate genes. One SNP KASPar marker was developed and fully validated for each trait.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among the different traits that characterize the complexity of reproductive biology in plants, male sterility and polyembryony are found within the Citrus genera and represent important features of citrus breeding programs.
Male sterility is an important trait because, when coupled with parthenocarpy [1], it allows to partially address the diversification of seedless mandarin varieties at the diploid level. Male sterility has been reported in Citrus aurantifolia [2], C. limon hybrids [3], C. medica [4], C. sinensis [2,5], C. yatsushiro [2], C. unshiu [5], and its hybrids [6]. Several levels and mechanisms of male sterility have been identified in citrus. Chromosomal aberrations, such as asynapsis, reciprocal translocation, and failure of spindle formation, are important phenomena causing pollen sterility. For example, reciprocal translocation is found to cause pollen sterility in the ‘Valencia’ sweet orange (C. sinensis) [6], inversion is the cause of partial pollen sterility in the ‘Mexican’ lime (C. aurantifolia) [6], and asynapsis with a genetic determinant has been identified in the ‘Mukaku Yuzu’ (C. junos), while this is induced by low temperature in the ‘Eureka’ lemon (C. limon) and the ‘Mexican’ lime [6,7]. Besides chromosomal aberration, nucleocytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is the most prevalent system in citrus, and it has been proposed that satsuma (C. unshiu) and progenies derived from satsuma (as female parent) display CMS caused by the cooperative action of both cytoplasmic and nuclear genes. Several studies have been performed to decipher the genetic control of male sterility derived from satsuma. Yamamoto et al. [8] demonstrate the interaction between nuclear and cytoplasmic genes by reciprocal hybridizations. Subsequent research has pointed to the involvement of nuclear genes in male sterility [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. DNA marker analysis for nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes and genome-wide SNP marker analysis showed that CMS in the satsuma was derived from its seed parent, the ‘Kishu’ mandarin (C. kinokuni), and that the nuclear genes come from the male parent, ‘Kunenbo’ mandarin (C. nobilis) [15,16,17]. Goto et al. [14] posited that male sterility was associated with failed pollen grain development and scant viability. These authors compute the index of male sterility in a population derived from satsuma using two parameters: (i) the number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA), and (ii) the apparent pollen fertility (APF). Both parameters are inherited by their progeny, suggesting the involvement of a nuclear factor. Recently, two QTLs related to male sterility have been reported: MS-P1, which is a major QTL for reducing the number of pollen grains per anther; and MS-F1, related to lower apparent pollen fertility [15]. However, the resolution of the genetic map was too low to develop efficient markers for early selection. For instance, one objective of this work is the development of new markers associated with male sterility trait for seedless breeding.
Apomixis (asexual embryo formation) has been observed in more than 400 plant species [18]; however, apomixis is not particularly common in agriculturally important woody crops, with the exception of apple, mango, and citrus [19,20]. In citrus, apomixis is sporophytic (also referred to as adventitious embryony from nucellar cells) [3,19], and it is present in most genotypes, with the exception of citron, pummelo, clementines, and some mandarin hybrids. The seeds of non-apomictic genotypes, also called monoembryonic genotypes, contain only one sexual embryo, whereas in apomictic genotypes (polyembryonic), there is one sexual embryo and multiple nucellar embryos genetically identical to the mother plant. In the seeds of polyembryonic citrus genotypes, the formation of the nucellar embryos can be initiated before fertilization [21], and competition between the zygotic and nucellar embryos generally results in the failure of the development of the zygotic embryo [3,19]. This characteristic is a strong limitation for using polyembryonic genotypes as female parents in sexual hybridizations, since it hampers the recovery of large hybrid populations. In programs aiming to introgress specific traits over several cycles of hybridization, the recovery and selection of monoembryonic hybrids to be used as female parents for further breeding is crucial due to the low number of parents available. Considering the very long juvenile phase in citrus, the development of molecular markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) appears particularly important for this trait. At the opposite end of the scale, polyembryony is very advantageous for rootstock production, since plants obtained from polyembryonic seeds are identical to the mother plant. That is why rootstock breeding programs look for polyembryonic hybrids to ensure clonal propagation by seedlings of the newly selected rootstock. Therefore, the development of markers associated with monoembryony and polyembryony will be very useful for MAS in both varieties and rootstock breeding programs.
On the basis of genomic analyses of primitive, wild, and cultivated citrus, Wang et al. [22] highlighted the emergence of apomixis during citrus domestication. These authors narrowed down the genetic locus responsible for citrus polyembryony to an 80 kb region located on chromosome 4 of the Chinese pummelo genome assembly (MKYQ00000000.1), containing 11 candidate genes. Among these genes, a candidate gene, CitRWP, was identified for the single dominant allele responsible for polyembryony, and a miniature inverted-repeat TE (MITE) insertion in the promoter region of the CitRWP gene cosegregated with the polyembryonic phenotype [22]. Later, Shimada et al. [23] reported the candidate gene, CitRKD1, at the polyembryonic locus, which plays a principal role in regulating somatic embryogenesis. These authors suggested that a MITE insertion in the upstream region might be involved in regulating the CitRKD1 transcription. For instance, the CitRKD1 gene comprises two alleles, polyembryonic allele with a MITE insertion, and monoembryonic without a MITE insertion. Recently, Catalano et al. [24] confirmed the allelic configuration for CitRKD1 in different lemon genotypes using MITE primers. Alongside that, based on this MITE insertion, our research group developed an InDel marker, which has been evaluated in segregation progenies and germplasm genetic diversity, obtaining good results with the genotypes analyzed. However, InDel analysis is time-consuming (PCR products must be resolved by electrophoresis in long-agarose gel), as well as expensive for studying a large number of progenies. Therefore, it is important to develop alternatives, such as SNP (Single nucleotide polymorphism) markers based on KASPar technology, to simplify and make the analysis faster and cheaper.
SNP genotyping by the KBiosciences Competitive Allele Specific PCR SNP genotyping (KASPar) technology is simple and cost-effective for genotyping a limited number of markers in large populations, as compared with other SNP genotyping assays. Highly efficient protocols have been adapted to work with citrus by Cuenca et al. [25] and Garcia-Lor et al. [26]. It therefore appears to be a very well-adapted methodology for MAS. The efficiency of MAS is directly linked to the vicinity of the used markers with the genes or factors directly implied in the expression of the targeted trait. The ability to identify candidate genes associated with useful traits has progressed significantly with the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, thereby facilitating the massive identification of SNP markers in large populations, as well as working on reduced genome representations. Examples include restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) [27,28], diversity array technology sequencing (DArTseq) [29], and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) [30,31]. In citrus GBS, RAD sequencing and DARTSeq have been successfully developed and used to study germplasm diversity and decipher related phylogenomic structures [32,33,34], high density genome mapping [35,36,37,38], as well as QTL analyses [39] and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [40].
The aims of this study were: (i) the identification of SNPs closely linked with male sterility and polyembryony. This was carried out by combining GBS data and analyzing the number of pollen grains per anther (NPG), apparent pollen fertility (APF), and polyembryony in a segregant progeny recovered from a cross between the male sterile and monoembryonic ‘Kiyomi’ tangor (C. unshiu × C. sinensis) as the female parent, and the male fertile and polyembryonic ‘Murcott’ tangor (C. sinensis × unknown mandarin) as the male parent); (ii) the identification of candidate genes associated with male sterility; and (iii) the development and assessment of SNP markers based on KASPar technology for MAS in citrus breeding programs for these two important traits.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. SNP Calling

According to the initial parameters indicated in the Section 3, the TASSEL software identified 22,326 di-allelic SNPs. We then filtered the positions where all replicates of the parents were identical, with at least one of the parents being heterozygous; other filters included those with less than 15% missing data, and with at least 10% minor allele frequency. This resulted in the selection of 6444 SNPs.

2.2. Genetic Linkage Maps of ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ Tangors: Synteny and Collinearity with the Reference Genome of Clementine

The SNP matrix, containing 6444 segregating markers and 61 individuals, was used to construct the genetic maps of the ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors. Markers which were heterozygous for the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor and homozygous for the ‘Murcott’ tangor were filtered for the linkage mapping of the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor. Markers which were heterozygous for the ‘Murcott’ tangor and homozygous for the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor were filtered for the linkage mapping of the ‘Murcott’ tangor. Markers with unexpected segregation according to the parents were eliminated. By the end of this process, in order to optimize the quality of genotyping data, only the SNPs within genes were selected, and only one marker per gene was conserved to limit the redundancy of the markers. The number of discarded markers in these filters is provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Linkage mapping of the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor was performed using a matrix of 1396 segregating SNPs and 61 individuals. A total of 1374 SNPs were assigned to one of the nine resulting linkage groups (LGs), which corresponds to the number of haploid chromosomes in citrus (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2). The number of markers was unequally distributed among the LGs. LG6 included only 53 SNPs, while 324 SNPs were attributed to LG3. The small number of markers found in LG6 was due to the high homozygosity of the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor in a large part of the corresponding chromosome. LG1 displayed the lowest genetic size (96.8 cM). LG3, comprising 324 SNPs, displayed the largest genetic size (237.7 cM) (Table 1). The entire map spanned 1416.3 cM, with an average interlocus distance of 1.04 cM. A total of 87% of SNPs had an interlocus gap of less than 3 cM, 12.6% of SNPs had an interlocus gap between 3 and 10 cM, and only 0.4% had a gap measuring more than 10 cM. Most of the LGs were composed of SNPs mapped onto the syntenic pseudo-chromosomes (Sc) of the clementine reference genome. The Circos representation and the Marey map plot between the genetic and physical locations over the clementine reference genome are provided in Supplementary Figure S1. The genetic map displayed high global synteny (98%). LG1, LG4, and LG9 displayed full synteny with the reference genome. LG2 (one in Sc5), LG3 (one in Sc1 and one in Sc2), LG5 (one in Sc4), and LG6 (one in Sc3 and one in Sc8) displayed almost full synteny. LG7 and LG8 stood out. Two, one, and six markers physically located on chromosomes 1, 4, and 5, respectively, were genetically mapped on LG7. One, six, and five markers physically located on chromosomes 1, 3, and 9, respectively, were mapped on LG8.
Linkage mapping of the ‘Murcott’ tangor was performed using a matrix of 737 segregating SNP markers and 61 individuals. A total of 697 were assigned to one of the nine resulting LGs, and the number of markers ranged from 40 for LG2 to 168 for LG8 (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S3). The total size of the genetic map was 1339.7 cM, with an average interlocus distance of 1.95 cM. The smallest LG was LG9, measuring 103.4 cM, while LG3 was the largest (231.3 cM). The interlocus gap of 74.9% of the SNPs was less than 3 cM, 23.3% of SNPs had an interlocus gap between 3 and 10 cM, while the genetic distance was more than 10 cM in only 1.9% of SNPs. Overall, synteny was high (96.1%) between the ‘Murcott’ tangor genetic map and the clementine reference genome (Supplementary Figure S2). LG2, LG5, and LG9 displayed full synteny with the reference genome. LG1 (one in Sc6), LG3 (one in Sc4, one in Sc8, and one in Sc9), LG4 (one in Sc2 and one in Sc3), LG6 (one in Sc3 and two in Sc8), and LG7 (one in Sc4 and two in Sc5) displayed almost full synteny. As already observed in the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor, LG8 had more SNPs that were not mapped on the corresponding pseudo-chromosome, with counts of four and 11 SNPs (out of a total of 168) located on the physical assembly of pseudo-chromosomes 3 and 9, respectively.
The ‘Kiyomi’ genetic map displayed high collinearity with the clementine reference genome, although incongruency between the genetic map and the physical positions over the reference genome was observed in a cluster of 14 markers between 30 and 34 cM on LG3. This misplaced genomic region was also shown for ‘Murcott’. However, only two markers were concerned due to the low number of heterozygous markers in this genomic region for ‘Murcott’. Additional shared discrepancies between the ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ genetic maps, and the C. clementina v1.0 assembly were observed for markers of chromosomes 3, 5 and 9 located, respectively, on LGs 8, 7, and 9. Similar discrepancies for the same genomic regions of the C. clementina v1.0 assembly were also identified in the high-density genetic maps of sweet orange and trifoliate orange [37], as well as in the reference genetic map of clementine [41] and ‘Fortune’ (C. clementina × C. tangerina) and ‘Ellendale’ (C. reticulata × C. sinensis) [38]. In this regard, Ollitrault et al. [38] suggested that most of the apparent non-syntenic or non-colinear markers were rather due to minor errors in the clementine genome assembly. Overall, the high synteny and collinearity with the clementine reference genome shown in the two genetic maps is consistent with previous studies concluding high synteny and collinearity between Citrus species [38,41,42,43]. ‘Murcott’ and ‘Kiyomi’ tangors are interesting parents, widely used for mandarin breeding, and the high-density genetic maps presented here can prove useful for optimizing their use in breeding programs.

2.3. Phenotypes and Marker–Trait Association Studies

2.3.1. Phenotypes

Among the 61 genotyped hybrids, 53 flowered during the three-year experiment, 52 of them produced fruits, and in 32 of these, the fruits contained seeds. Data obtained for the phenotyped traits NPGA and APF, as well as the polyembryony of each hybrid, are displayed in Supplementary Table S4.
Male sterility phenotyping was performed based on NPGA and APF. The ANOVA analysis showed significant differences between genotypes for NPGA, while no differences were observed between genotypes for APF (Table 2).
As shown in Figure 1, great differences, particularly for APF, were observed within several genotypes, while the data obtained for NPGA were more homogeneous within genotypes. Taking both parameters together, some genotypes showed high APF, but very low NPGA values. For example, for KM-1 and KM-2 with similar APF averages of 73% and 82%, respectively, the average NPGA values were 1950 and 81, respectively. Therefore, KM-1 is a male fertile hybrid, while KM-2 is practically a male sterile hybrid (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S4).
None of the hybrids with high NPGA values showed APF values low enough to cause male sterility, suggesting that NPGA is the key factor in male sterility in the ’Kiyomi‘ × ‘Murcott’ offspring. In this line, Goto et al. [14] evaluated NPGA and APF in a satsuma progeny, and reported that male sterility is primarily caused by decreased NPGA. Although satsuma is generally described as male sterile, several studies have pointed out that male sterility in satsuma is partial and influenced by both environmental conditions and genotype. In fact, new varieties have been obtained using pollen from satsuma [44]. In this regard, Yang and Nakagawa [45,46] reported that temperature treatments at 15 °C and 20 °C during flower bud growth and development are favorable in the recovery of male fertility in satsuma. In addition to this, a low degree of male fertility has also been achieved under field conditions, as has been shown by Vithanage [47], who reported two seeds per fruit when ‘Ellendale’ tangor was pollinated with satsuma, and by Goto et al. [14], who reported an average of 389 NPGA in ‘Okitsu wase’ satsuma. In the same paper, Goto et al. [14] reported that pollen grains in ‘Kiyomi’ (satsuma × sweet orange) were not detected, suggesting that male sterility in ‘Kiyomi’ is stricter than in satsuma. In this study, we have observed an average of one NPGA in ‘Kiyomi’. This very low value points to strict male sterility in ‘Kiyomi’, and the fact that it is not complete. Beyond the differences in NPGA values between hybrids producing low numbers of pollen grains, Goto et al. [15] suggested that the release of pollen grains from anthers occurs when a certain NPGA value is exceeded. They also assumed that the presence of less than approximately 1300 NPGA was a crucial criterion for male sterility. In this study, we have observed pollen grain release in those anthers with more than 1000 NPGA. Thus, we have established 1000 NPGA as the criterion of male sterility.
In Figure 2, we display the histogram obtained for NPGA. A total of 49% of the hybrids plus ‘Kiyomi’ produced less than 250 NPGA, and 6% produced between 500 and 1000 NPGA; 36% of the hybrids plus ‘Murcott’ produced between 1000 and 4000 NPGA, and 9% produced more than 4000 NPGA (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S4).
As expected, all seeds of the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor were monoembryonic, and all seeds of the ‘Murcott’ tangor were polyembryonic. Of the 32 hybrids that produced fruits with seeds, 12 of them produced monoembryonic seeds (37.5%), and the other 20 (62.5%) hybrids produced polyembryonic seeds. In the last group, we found nine hybrids with solely polyembryonic seeds, and 11 hybrids with percentages of polyembryonic seeds ranging between 14 and 92% (Supplementary Table S4).

2.3.2. Marker–Trait Association

Through a general linear model (GLM) using default parameters in the TASSEL 5 software, polyembryony and male sterility marker–trait association studies were separately evaluated in both ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors maps. The statistical significance of the genetic and phenotypic associations was calculated with a 0.05 probability threshold, as well as applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. For the `Murcott’ tangor, the probability threshold was p ≤ 7.5 × 10−5 (0.05/670) or −log(p) >= 4.01, whereas for `Kiyomi´, it was p ≤ 3.7 × 10−5 (0.05/1346) or −log(p) >= 4.43.
The TASSEL software was designed to evaluate trait associations, evolutionary patterns, and linkage disequilibrium using GWAS. It has been successfully used for marker–trait association studies using bi-parental progenies. Applying GLM, Sumitomo et al. [48] tagged SNP markers onto the flower color genes in autohexaploid Chrysanthemum, and Shibaya et al. [49] identified QTLs for root color and carotenoid contents in carrot. In Japanese plum, Salazar et al. [50] identified QTLs linked to fruit quality traits using three F1 progenies with a common female parent.
Here, a genotype–phenotype association study for male sterility was performed for the NPGA trait. APF was not used for association studies, since no significant differences were observed between the hybrids. In the ‘Murcott’ gamete map, the GLM identified 68 SNP markers with statistical significance (Supplementary Table S5). All of them were located on 68 different genes on LG8. A total of 49 of these markers were clustered in a region of 4.79 Mb (between the positions 2107212 and 6899421 bp), corresponding to a genetic region of 26.735 cM (between 26.771 and 53.506 cM) (Figure 3a and Supplementary Table S5). The most significant marker identified was S08_4417545, with a p-value of 1.02E-10 (LOD = 9.99) and a genetic position of 46.436 cM (Supplementary Table S5).
All hybrids with the TT allelic configuration for the SNP S08_4417545 were male-sterile. The vast majority of the hybrids with the CT allelic configuration produced more than 1000 NPGA, none of them showing very low values for NPGA (Figure 3b). It should be noted that some significative SNPs were identified outside of the clustered region (between 26.771 and 53.506 cM) (Figure 3a and Supplementary Table S5), therefore it is likely that other genomic regions on LG8 can be involved in male sterility. Through QTL mapping of a population derived from two satsuma hybrids, Goto et al. [15] identified three QTLs (MS-P1, MS-P2 and MS-P3) associated with NPGA. The most associated MS-P1, located on LG8 (genetic position 37.5 cM), may correspond to the association genomic region for NPGA identified in our GLM analysis. In addition, the two other QTLs with lower associations, MS-P2 and MS-P3, both located on LG6b and separated by a genetic distance of 29 cM, suggest that other genomic regions can also be involved in this trait.
For polyembryony, through the genetic association study performed in the ‘Murcott’ gamete map, GLM identified 25 SNP markers with statistical significance, all of them located on 25 different genes on chromosome 1. These markers were clustered in a region of 9.85 Mb (located between positions 17831378 and 27687717 bp), corresponding with a genetic region of 64.127 cM (between 79.356 and 143.483 cM) (Figure 3c and Supplementary Table S5). For the most significant marker (S01_25165173), all hybrids with the CG allele produced polyembryonic seeds, the total of which exceeded 25% of the total (Figure 3d). Averages of polyembryonic seeds between 69.8 and 91.4% have been reported in apomictic genotypes by Kishore et al. [51]. We performed a BLASTn search of the sequence of the CitRWP gene of the pummelo genome in the genome assembly of C. clementina v1.0 Wang et al. [22] demonstrated that the insertion of a MITE in close vicinity of this gene was responsible for polyembryony in mandarins. The BLAST analysis identified the annotated gene, Ciclev10010497m, as the homologue of CitRWP with a high-scoring segment pair (HSP), with a positive identity of 99.89%. This gene is located on chromosome 1 at position 25480488–25482037 bp of the C. clementina assembly. The genomic regions of 25165173–25690547 bp on chromosome 1, defined by the markers included within a 5 cM interval each side of the higher signal marker in our association study, include the Ciclev10010497m location. Therefore, our results are in full agreement with previous conclusions regarding the importance of CitRWP for polyembryony in mandarin.

2.4. Gene Annotations of the Genomic Region Associated with Male Sterility

The 4.79 Mb genomic region identified in our GWAS was examined for gene annotations in the clementine genome (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov [52] (accessed on 7 June 2022). A genomic region (between 5913054 and 6901468 bp) containing 67 annotated genes, 19 of which are involved in different biological pathways that may affect pollen formation or development, draws our attention. These genes include papain-like cysteine protease enzymes, pentatricopeptide repeat, ATP binding, plant homeodomain-finger family protein, WD40 repeat-like, and 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase. Gene annotations are provided in Supplementary Table S6.
The annotation functions of two genes (Ciclev10028670m.g and Ciclev10029917m.g) are associated with papain-like cysteine protease enzymes. Cysteine protease plays a critical regulatory role in programmed cell death (PCD), and its regulation is influenced by temperature stress [53]. Tapetum, a layer of cells surrounding microspores, is key in pollen development, providing nutritive proteins, enzymes, and sporopollenin precursors for pollen maturation [54]. During the late stages of pollen development, tapetum undergoes PCD, and either premature [55] or inhibition [56] PCD of tapetal cells will result in male sterility. The importance of cysteine proteases in pollen formation has been reported in tobacco [57,58,59], Arabidopsis [60,61], soybean [62], tomato [63], rice [64], cabbage [65], and brassica [66].
In total, five genes around SNP08_6142645 (Ciclev10030265m.g, Ciclev10029744m.g, Ciclev10028481m.g, Ciclev10030279m.g, and Ciclev10029914m.g) are annotated as Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR). The PPR superfamily protein represents the most frequent protein class identified as restorers of fertility (Rf). Examples of PPRs characterized as Rf and confirmed through transgenic analysis include Rf-PPR592 in petunia, Rfo in radish, and Rf1A, Rf1B, Rf3, Rf4, Rf5, Rf6, GRP162, and PPR762 in rice (reviewed in Gaborieau et al. [67]).
Another nine genes around SNP08_6142645 (Ciclev10029967m.g, Ciclev10028124m.g, Ciclev10030242m.g, Ciclev10028233m.g. Ciclev10030082m.g, Ciclev10029947m.g, Ciclev10030361m.g, Ciclev10028181m.g, and Ciclev10030145m.g) are annotated as related to ATP binding, a transport protein involved in sporopollenin (the material that forms the durable, chemically stable outer layer on pollen grains) export and/or shuttling from the tapetum. Chang et al. [68] reported that the OsABCG3 gene (an ATP binding cassette) is essential for pollen development in rice. Other genes in this genomic region include Ciclev10029260m.g, which encodes a plant homeodomain (PHD)-finger family protein. In Arabidopsis, the male meiocyte death1 gene encodes a PHD-finger protein which is required for male meiosis [69]; Ciclev10028263m.g encodes a WD repeat protein, which regulates pollen growth and viability in Flax (Linum usitatissium L.) [70]; and Ciclev10028796m.g with the 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase domain localized on the C-terminal part of Polyprenol reductase2, of which the deficiency causes male sterility in Arabidopsis [71].
Pollen grain number in angiosperms is a key reproductive trait that has been studied extensively for decades. Despite its agricultural and evolutionary importance, the genetic basis of the pollen grain number has remained elusive, primarily due to its quantitative nature [72]. The information generated from gene annotations allows us to focus our efforts on 19 genes related to male sterility over the 67 genes annotated in the genomic region identified by the QTL analysis. This limited number will now allow for the development of affordable, albeit time-consuming, approaches to determine whether these genes are actually involved in the male sterility and citrus interaction. Further experiments will be necessary to shed light on this complex trait of citrus reproductive biology.

2.5. Development and Validation of SNP Markers Associated to Male Sterility and Polyembryony

According to our GWAS analysis, we developed one KASPar SNP marker for each trait. For male sterility, the candidate region, between 5,913,054 and 6,901,468 Kb, contained three SNPs: S08_6026790 in Ciclev10027952m.g, S08_6050573 in Ciclev10027768m.g, and S08_6142645 in Ciclev10028670m.g (Supplementary Table S6). Since Ciclev10028670m.g is annotated to encode papain-like cysteine protease enzymes (of which the importance in pollen formation has been widely reported), we chose S08_6142645 (hereinafter SNP8) for the development of the male sterility KASPar SNP marker. SNP8 is located on the physical position 6,142,645 on chromosome 8 of the C. clementina v1.0 genome assembly, corresponding to the genetical position 53.506 cM on the ‘Murcott’ map.
In the framework of our breeding program, a progeny of 20 diploid hybrids obtained from open pollinated ‘Kiyomi’ tangor was phenotyped for male sterility and analyzed thorough KASPar with the S08 SNP marker (Table 3).
Table 3. Genetic analysis of 20 hybrids recovered with ‘Kiyomi’ as a female parent and an unknown male parent, with the S08_6142645 SNP marker associated to male sterility.
Table 3. Genetic analysis of 20 hybrids recovered with ‘Kiyomi’ as a female parent and an unknown male parent, with the S08_6142645 SNP marker associated to male sterility.
IndividualPhenotypeGenotype
Kiyomi × Unknown-1FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-2SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-3SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-4FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-5SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-6FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-7FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-8SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-9FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-10SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-11SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-12FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-13FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-14SterileCC
Kiyomi × Unknown-15FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-16FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-17FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-18FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-19FertileCT
Kiyomi × Unknown-20SterileCC
Male fertile or sterile phenotype is based on the observations of both the fresh anthers color and the quantity of pollen grains in dehiscent anthers (see Figure 4). KASPar plot obtained with the S08_6142645 SNP marker is provided in Supplementary Figure S3.
Figure 4. Different types of flower phenotypes observed in the segregation progeny recovered from the cross between ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’. (ac) High number; (df) moderate-to-low; (gi) very low-to-null pollen grain quantity. This quantification was observed in flowers at anthesis (a,d,g), fresh anthers (b,e,h), and dehiscent anthers (c,f,i).
Figure 4. Different types of flower phenotypes observed in the segregation progeny recovered from the cross between ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’. (ac) High number; (df) moderate-to-low; (gi) very low-to-null pollen grain quantity. This quantification was observed in flowers at anthesis (a,d,g), fresh anthers (b,e,h), and dehiscent anthers (c,f,i).
Plants 12 01567 g004
A total of eight of the 20 hybrids produced flowers with pale yellow or off-white anthers and low-to-null pollen quantity. All of these hybrids displayed CC allelic configuration for SNP8. On the other hand, 12 hybrids displayed flowers with a fertile phenotype (yellow anthers and a high quantity of pollen grains) associated with CT allelic configuration for this SNP. In addition, 11 different commercial mandarin cultivars were analyzed (Supplementary Table S7). ‘Okitsu’ satsuma, ‘Kiyomi’ tangor, and ‘Queen’ mandarin were classified as male sterile (CC), whereas the other mandarins were genotyped as fertile, with CT allelic configuration for ‘Nadorcott’, ‘Murcott’, ‘Kara’, and ‘Encore’ mandarins, and TT allelic configuration for ‘Clemenules’, ‘Campeona’, ‘Fortune’, and ‘Ellendale’. It is expected that when crossing a male sterile (CC) cultivar as the seed parent with pollen from a fertile (CT) cultivar, 50% of the hybrids will be male sterile and the other 50% will be fertile, meanwhile 100% of the hybrids will be male fertile when using pollen from a (TT) fertile cultivar. Nevertheless, this SNP marker has been tested in these two populations with very good results and it would be of interest to test in others genetic contexts, that we do not have at this moment.
Regarding polyembryony, among the most significant SNPs identified in our association study for polyembryony, S01_25497528 was the most closely positioned to the blasted sequence of the CitRWP gene [22] in the C. clementina v1.0 reference. Thus, we used this SNP to develop the hereinafter SNP1, located on chromosome 1 of the C. clementina v1.0 genome assembly at position 25497528, corresponding to the genetic position of 126.64 cM on the ‘Murcott’ genetic map. This marker was analyzed in 83 citrus genotypes, including 53 polyembryonic, and 30 monoembryonic cultivars. A summary of the results from phenotyping and SNP1 genotyping is indicated in Table 4.
SNP1 marker genotype was in agreement with the mono/polyembryony phenotype in most horticultural groups, except Citrumelo (C. paradisi × P. trifoliata), Fortunella spp., and Poncirus spp. (Table 4 and Supplementary Table S8). For Fortunella and Poncirus spp., these mismatches are in accordance with the hypothesis reported by Wang et al. [73], who suggest that the parallel evolution of Fortunella and Citrus has driven the evolution of apomixis in these genera in a differentiated way, resulting in the heterogeneity of genes causing polyembryony in Citrinae, a subtribe comprising Fortunella, Poncirus and Citrus genera, among others. Polyembryonic Poncirus genotypes do not have MITE insertions in the promoter region of the CitRWP gene, and it is also not expressed in nucellar ovule cells, suggesting another causal gene [73,74]. Therefore, the SNP1 marker is fully validated for apomixis characterization of germplasm and hybrids of breeding projects derived from admixture between C. reticulata and C. maxima or/and C. medica, where the polyembryonic trait was inherited from the C. reticulata ancestor.
The SNP1 marker will be very useful for the selection of new monoembryonic parents aimed at obtaining new varieties. That is particularly relevant in view of the limited number of monoembryonic female parents available today for the use in breeding programs. In fact, we are routinely using the SNP1 marker in our breeding program to select monoembryonic parents. This, together with the selection for resistance to Alternaria brown spot fungus disease [75], allows us to be more efficient in the selection of parents with improved characteristics. The selected parents are subsequently induced for early flowering by a viral vector based on the Citrus leaf blotch virus [76]. This strategy shortens the time needed to recover new improved genetic combinations. In addition, the SNP1 marker will be very useful for the identification of polyembryonic hybrids in rootstock breeding programs which look for polyembryony, because it allows for ease, expense reduction, and consistency of rootstock propagation in the nursery [77]. All these show the high potential of SNP1 for MAS.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

A diploid hybrid population, derived from the cross between the diploids ‘Kiyomi’ tangor (IVIA-405) as the female parent and ‘Murcott’ tangor (IVIA-196) as the male parent, was used. The ‘Kiyomi’ tangor is a male sterile and monoembryonic hybrid between the ‘Miyagawa-wase’ satsuma and the ‘Trovita’ sweet orange [78], while the ‘Murcott’ tangor is a male fertile and polyembryonic genotype presumed F1 hybrid of sweet orange and an unknown mandarin. Both parents, belong to the Citrus Germplasm Bank of the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), located in Moncada, Valencia (Spain). Sixty-two hybrids were recovered and all of them were analyzed by flow cytometry, according to Aleza et al. [79]. Sixty-one were diploids and one triploid hybrid was obtained from female unreduced gamete, which was not included in the genetic analysis. The progeny was grafted in June 2011 onto C. macrophylla Wester rootstock at the IVIA experimental orchard for genetic analysis and further studies related with fruit quality.

3.2. Plant Genotyping

A total of 61 diploid hybrids from the ‘Kiyomi’ × ‘Murcott’ cross and the two parents were subjected to genotyping by sequencing (GBS), as described by Ollitrault et al. [38]. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Plant DNAeasy® kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of genomic DNA was adjusted to 20 ng/μL, and the ApekI GBS libraries were prepared following the protocol described by Elshire et al. [30]. The DNA of each sample (200 ng) was digested with the ApekI enzyme (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK). Digestion took place at 75 °C for 2 h, and then at 65 °C for 20 min to inactivate the enzyme. The ligation reaction was completed in the same plate as the digestion, again, using the T4 DNA ligase enzyme (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) at 22 °C for 1 h; the ligase was inactivated prior to pooling the samples by holding it at 65 °C for 20 min. For each library, ligated samples were pooled (i.e., 2 multiplex libraries of 96 samples) and PCR-amplified in a single tube. Complexity was further reduced using PCR primers with one selective base (A), as described by Sonah et al. [80]. Single-end sequencing was performed on a single lane of an Illumina HiSeq4000. Keygene N.V. (Keygene, Wageningen, The Netherlands) owns the patents and patent applications protecting its sequence-based genotyping technologies. SNP genotype calling was performed using data from the DNA sequence reads with the TASSEL 5 GBS v2 pipeline [31] (available at https://bitbucket.org/tasseladmin/tassel-5-source/wiki/Tassel5GBSv2Pipeline (accessed on 7 June 2022) with default parameters, to identify good quality, unique, sequence reads with barcodes. These sequences were aligned on the C. clementina 1.0 reference genome (available at https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov, accessed 7 June 2022) using Bowtie v2/2.3.2. For genotype calling, positions with less than five reads were considered as missing data. Next, polymorphic positions were filtered for diallelic SNPs and minor allele frequencies (MAF) over 0.05.

3.3. Linkage Analysis and Genetic Mapping

The two-way pseudo-testcross mapping strategy implemented for genetic mapping from progenies, resulting from crosses between two heterozygous parents [81] and used in previous high-density mapping studies in citrus [35,37,38,39,41], was applied to establish the ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ genetic maps. For each map, SNP markers were selected according to their respective heterozygosity for the mapped parent and homozygosity for the other one. Each set of data for the 61 hybrids was filtered to retain markers and hybrids with less than 15% of missing data. Linkage analysis and genetic mapping were then performed using JoinMap5 (https://www.kyazma.nl/index.php/JoinMap/; accessed 7 June 2022). Linkage mapping was performed in the «Hap» option for both ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors. Markers were grouped using the independence LOD score. The phases (coupling and repulsion) of the linked marker loci were automatically detected by the software. Map distances were estimated in cM, using the regression mapping algorithm. After a first mapping round, singletons, i.e., an individual genotype that suggested recombination with its two flanking markers, were identified and replaced by missing data, as recommended by van Os et al. [82] for high density genetic maps. At the same time, a number of individuals displaying an aberrant number of recombination, set by examining the global recombination distribution, were removed, as we considered their genotype calling quality to be insufficient. The synteny and collinearity of both the ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ genetic maps, with the reference clementine genome, were visualized using Circos v0.69-9 [83]; (http://circos.ca; accessed on 7 June 2022) in Galaxy [84]. Marey maps were drawn using Microsoft® Excel® 365 MSO (16.0.15601.20526) to visualize changes in the recombination rate along the genome.

3.4. Histological Observations

The male sterility phenotyping was based on the number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA) and the apparent pollen fertility (APF) of hybrids which flowered on each blossom. For this, three flowers per genotype were collected on the day of anthesis. A total of 10 anthers per flower were removed with forceps and placed into 3 different 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes, with 3 tubes per genotype. Following this, opened Eppendorf tubes were left in a desiccator with silica gel at room temperature, until dehiscence. Dehiscent anthers were confirmed under stereomicroscope, and samples were sorted into three levels, according to pollen grain quantity visually observed: high (Figure 4a–c), moderate-to-low (Figure 4d–f), and very low-to-null (Figure 4g–i). Phenotyping was performed during three flowering periods belonging to the following years: 2019, 2020, and 2021.
Samples were stored at −20 °C until quantification. For pollen grain suspension a staining solution [85], based on Alexander staining [86], was added into the 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube containing the dehiscent anthers. The volume of staining added depended on scored visual observations of dehiscent anthers: 25 μL was added to those samples scored as having null-to-very low quantity of pollen grains, 50 μL to low and moderate samples, and 100 μL to samples scored as moderate-to-high. Eppendorf tubes containing the dehiscent anthers with the staining solution were placed at 70 °C for 30 min. Next, a spin of one hour at 10,000 rpm was performed to separate pollen grains from the theca.
The pollen grain dispersion was shaken with a vortex and, immediately, 15 drops of 0.3 μL were placed onto a slide. Drops were photographed (Figure 5a) with a Leica DMLS microscope, and the number of pollen grains per drop was counted with the ImageJ 2.0.0-rc-61/1.52n software [87].
The number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA) was calculated as follows:
NPGA = sum   of   NPG / 15 × 0.3 × Vol / 10
where the sum of NPGA is the total number of pollen grains counted in the 15 drops of 0.3 μL; 10 is the number of anthers; and Vol is the volume (25, 50 o 100 μL) of staining solution added for pollen grain dispersion.
Stain solution colored non-viable pollen grains as blue-green, and viable pollen grains as magenta-red. Since staining solution was used as a liquid medium to disperse the pollen grains, APF and NPGA values were evaluated simultaneously (Figure 5). To determine if there were significant differences between NPGA and APF variables of phenotyped hybrids, a one-way ANOVA test was performed using the Statgraphics Centurion XVI statistical software package, v16.1.03. A p-value of less than 0.05 was classified as statistically significant between the averages of NPGA and APF of phenotyped hybrids.

3.5. Seed Phenotyping for Polyembryony

Fruits from the hybrids between ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors were harvested when ripe, and seeds were then extracted. Each seed was peeled, eliminating the outer and inner seed coats with forceps. Seeds with only one embryo were classified as monoembryonic, whereas seeds with more than one embryo were recorded as polyembryonic.

3.6. Genotype–Phenotype Association

TASSEL v5.2.87 [88] was used to perform the genotype–phenotype association study. Genotype and phenotype data sets were joined by the union of taxa using the Union Join command. Then, the genotype–phenotype association was evaluated using the GLM (general linear model) procedure under the default settings, and the results were displayed using the Manhattan plot graph.

3.7. SNP Genotyping

SNP markers were genotyped using KASParTM technology by KBioscience® (https://www.biosearchtech.com/ (accessed on 7 June 2022). KASParTM technology uses allele-specific amplification, followed by fluorescence detection. Sample DNA is amplified with a thermal cycler using allele-specific primers based on the SNP locus-flanking sequence (approx. 50 nucleotides on each side of the SNP). The KASParTM system uses two Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) cassettes, where fluorometric dye is conjugated to the primer, but quenched via resonance energy transfer when the FRET cassette primer is hybridized with DNA [89].

4. Conclusions

GBS was used to genotype 61 diploid hybrids from an F1 progeny recovered from crossing the male sterile and monoembryonic ‘Kiyomi’ tangor as the female parent with the male fertile and polyembryonic ‘Murcott’ tangor as the male parent. Raw sequences were aligned to the clementine genome and 6444 SNPs were obtained. After filtering for SNPs within genes and heterozygous for only one of the parents, we established the genetic map for each parent with the JoinMap.5 software. The two maps, respectively, include 1374 and 697 markers, and encompass 1416.287 and 1339.735 cM for ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’. The two maps were globally highly syntenic and colinear with the C. clementina v1.0 assembly; however, they confirmed previous constatations for probable small incongruences of the C. clementina genome assembly in chromosomes 3, 5, and 9. The progenies were phenotyped for male sterility based on the number of pollen grains per anther (NPG) and apparent pollen fertility (APF) values, as well as for polyembryony. The genotype–trait association study, using the general linear model (GLM), identified a genomic region on linkage group 8 significantly associated with NPGA; however, no association was observed for APF, indicating that NPGA is the major factor for male sterility in the progeny derived from ‘Kiyomi’ × ‘Murcott’. We also identified a genomic region on linkage group 1 significantly associated with polyembryony. The analysis of gene annotation in the region of chromosome 8 associated with NPGA revealed 19 candidate genes implied in pollen development in other plant species. An SNP marker (S08_6142645) based on KASPar technology was developed in the Ciclev10028670m.g gene, appertaining to the papain cysteine protease family, well known for its importance in pollen development. It was validated on a family of uncontrolled hybrids of ‘Kiyomi’ mother plants. We also developed an SNP marker for polyembryony, choosing the SNP in the ‘Murcott’ genetic map closest to the CitRWP gene involved in mandarin apomixis. This marker was fully validated on a collection of varieties derived from C. reticulata, C. maxima, and C. medica ancestors. However, it was not efficient for polyembryonic accessions derived from P. trifoliata, and the Fortunella sp. This last result is in agreement with previous hypotheses for multiple origins of polyembryony in the true citrus genera.
Male sterility is a desirable trait for seedless breeding and polyembryony is a crucial reproductive feature to be considered in breeding, for both rootstocks and varieties. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is key in breeding programs, particularly in tree species with long juvenile period, such as citrus, since the selection of target genotypes can be carried out at the seedling stage. In recent years, molecular tagging techniques have evolved, and SNP markers have emerged as an indispensable tool in genetic applications and breeding programs. To our knowledge, the SNP1_25497528 and SNP8_6142645 developed here are the first available to be successfully used in MAS for polyembryony and male sterility in a wide range of citrus genotypes, and will be very useful for MAS breeding programs for varieties and rootstocks.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12071567/s1, Figure S1: Synteny and collinearity of the ‘Kiyomi’ tangor genetic map with the reference genome of clementine; Figure S2: Synteny and collinearity of the ‘Murcott’ tangor genetic map with the reference genome of clementine; Figure S3: Plots of the allele signals of KASPar analysis for S08_6142645 and S01_25497528 markers; Table S1: Number of filtered, discarded, and used SNPs markers to perform the linkage mapping of ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors; Table S2: Detail of the ‘Kiyomi’ genetic map, including physical position (clementine reference genome), genetic position, and the gene identifier on which the marker is located; Table S3: Detail of the ‘Murcott’ genetic map, including physical position (clementine reference genome), genetic position, and the gene identifier on which the marker is located; Table S4: Phenotypes of pollen traits and polyembryony for ‘Kiyomi’, ‘Murcott’ and the ‘Kiyomi’ × ‘Murcott’ progeny; Table S5: Markers associated with the number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA) and polyembryony (PE) in the ‘Murcott’ gametes map; Table S6: Gene annotations in the assembled sequence of the genomic region of chromosome 8, associated with male sterility. Annotations related to pollen development are indicated in red letters. (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov (accessed on 2 March 2023)). Number in brackets close to the gene identifier indicates that it contains an SNP marker. (1) S08_6026790; (2) S08_6050573 and (3) S08_6142645; Table S7: Genotypes for S08_6142645 SNP in different commercial mandarin cultivars; Table S8: Phenotypes for polyembryony and genotypes for S01_25497528 SNP (SNP1) in a germplasm collection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M., P.O. and P.A.; methodology, R.M.; software, R.M., J.C., and P.O.; validation, R.M., P.A. and P.O.; formal analysis, P.O.; investigation, R.M.; resources, P.A.; GBS data curation, P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.; writing—review and editing, R.M., P.A., L.N. and P.O.; visualization, R.M., P.A. and P.O.; supervision, P.A. and P.O.; project administration, P.A. and M.C.V.; funding acquisition, P.A. and M.C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by project PID2021-128115OR-I00, funded by Ministry of Science and Innovation, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article or as Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Montalt, R.; Vives, M.C.; Navarro, L.; Ollitrault, P.; Aleza, P. Parthenocarpy and self-incompatibility in mandarins. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nakamura, M. Cytological and ecological studies on the genus Citrus, with special reference to the occurence of sterile pollen grains. Mem. Fac. Sci. Agr. Taihoku Imp. Univ. 1943, 27, 53–159. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frost, H.B.; Soost, R.K. Seed Reproduction: Development of Gametes and Embryios. In The Citrus Industry. Volume II. Anatomy, Physiology, Genetics, and Reproduction; Reuther, W., Webber, H., Batchelor, L., Eds.; Berkely University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 1968; pp. 290–324. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oppenheim, J.D.; Frankel, O.H. Investigations into the fertilization of the “Jaffa-orange” I. Genetica 1929, 11, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Osawa, I. Cytological and experimental studies in Citrus. J. Coll. Agric. Tokyo Univ. 1912, 4, 83–116. [Google Scholar]
  6. Iwamasa, M. Studies on the sterility in genus Citrus with special reference to the seedlessness. Bull. Hort. Res. Sta. B 1966, 6, 1–81. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ollitrault, P.; Froelicher, Y.; Dambier, D.; Luro, F.; Yamamoto, M. Seedlessness and ploidy manipulation. In Citrus Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology; Khan, I., Ed.; CABI: Wallingfor, UK, 2007; pp. 197–218. ISBN 9780851990194. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yamamoto, M.; Matsumoto, R.; Okudai, N.; Yamada, Y. Aborted anthers of citrus result from gene-cytoplasmic male sterility. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 1997, 70, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakano, M.; Nesumi, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Yoshida, T. Segregation of plants with undeveloped anthers among hybrids derived from the seed parent, “Kiyomi” (Citrus unshiu x C. sinensis). J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2001, 70, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chae, C.-W.; Dutt, M.; Yun, S.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H. Development of a SCAR marker linked to male fertility traits in’Jinkyool’(Citrus sunki). J. Life Sci. 2011, 21, 1659–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dewi, P.S.; Wakana, A.; Tanimoto, Y.; Sakai, K.; Kajiwara, K. Precocious flowering of Citrus seedlings and its use for determination of cultivars generating male sterile progenies. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2013, 160, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dewi, P.S.; Wakana, A.; Tanimoto, Y.; Fujiwara, Y.; Sakai, K.; Kajiwara, K. Morphology of sterile anthers and inheritance of cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility in zygotic seedlings of polyembryonic acid citrus. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2013, 82, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zheng, B.-B.; Wu, X.-M.; Ge, X.-X.; Deng, X.-X.; Grosser, J.W.; Guo, W.-W. Comparative transcript profiling of a male sterile cybrid pummelo and its fertile type revealed altered gene expression related to flower development. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Goto, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Kita, M.; Hamada, H.; Shimizu, T. Segregation and heritability of male sterility in populations derived from progeny of satsuma mandarin. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Goto, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Kita, M.; Hamada, H.; Shimizu, T. QTL mapping of male sterility and transmission pattern in progeny of Satsuma Mandarin. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Shimizu, T.; Kitajima, A.; Nonaka, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Goto, S.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Mochizuki, T.; Nagasaki, H.; et al. Hybrid origins of citrus varieties inferred from DNA marker analysis of nuclear and organelle genomes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Shimizu, T.; Tanizawa, Y.; Mochizuki, T.; Nagasaki, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Kaminuma, E.; Nakamura, Y. Draft sequencing of the heterozygous diploid genome of satsuma (Citrus unshiu Marc.) using a hybrid assembly approach. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, S.; Liang, M.; Wang, N.; Xu, Q.; Deng, X.; Chai, L. Reproduction in woody perennial citrus: An update on nucellar embryony and self-incompatibility. Plant Reprod. 2018, 31, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koltunow, A.M. Apomixis: Embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1425–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dwivedi, S.L.; Perotti, E.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Ortiz, R. Sexual and apomictic plant reproduction in the genomics era: Exploring the mechanisms potentially useful in crop plants. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2010, 23, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Wakana, A.; Uemoto, S. Adventive embryogenesis in citrus I. The occurrence of adventive embryos without pollination or fertilization. Am. J. Bot. 1987, 74, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cao, L.; Huang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wu, G.; Tian, S.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; et al. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shimada, T.; Endo, T.; Fujii, H.; Nakano, M.; Sugiyama, A.; Daido, G.; Ohta, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Omura, M. MITE insertion-dependent expression of CitRKD1 with a RWP-RK domain regulates somatic embryogenesis in citrus nucellar tissues. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Catalano, C.; Las Casas, G.; Giuffrida, A.; Ferlito, F.; Di Guardo, M.; Continella, A.; Bennici, S.; La Malfa, S.; Gentile, A.; Distefano, G. Reproductive biology factors hampering lemon [Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.] genetic improvement. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cuenca, J.; Aleza, P.; Navarro, L.; Ollitrault, P. Assignment of SNP allelic configuration in polyploids using competitive allele-specific PCR: Application to citrus triploid progeny. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Garcia-Lor, A.; Ancillo, G.; Navarro, L.; Ollitrault, P. Citrus (Rutaceae) SNP markers based on Competitive Allele-Specific PCR; transferability across the Aurantioideae subfamily. Appl. Plant Sci. 2013, 1, apps.1200406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Davey, J.W.; Hohenlohe, P.A.; Etter, P.D.; Boone, J.Q.; Catchen, J.M.; Blaxter, M.L. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Davey, J.W.; Blaxter, M.L. RADSeq: Next-generation population genetics. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2010, 9, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sansaloni, C.; Petroli, C.; Jaccoud, D.; Carling, J.; Detering, F.; Grattapaglia, D.; Kilian, A. Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) and next-generation sequencing combined: Genome-wide, high throughput, highly informative genotyping for molecular breeding of Eucalyptus. BMC Proc. 2011, 5, P54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Elshire, R.J.; Glaubitz, J.C.; Sun, Q.; Poland, J.A.; Kawamoto, K.; Buckler, E.S.; Mitchell, S.E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Glaubitz, J.C.; Casstevens, T.M.; Lu, F.; Harriman, J.; Elshire, R.J.; Sun, Q.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL-GBS: A high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Penjor, T.; Mimura, T.; Matsumoto, R.; Yamamoto, M.; Nagano, Y. Characterization of limes (Citrus aurantifolia) grown in Bhutan and Indonesia using high-throughput sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Oueslati, A.; Salhi-Hannachi, A.; Luro, F.; Vignes, H.; Mournet, P.; Ollitrault, P. Genotyping by sequencing reveals the interspecific C. maxima / C. reticulata admixture along the genomes of modern citrus varieties of mandarins, tangors, tangelos, orangelos and grapefruits. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ahmed, D.; Comte, A.; Curk, F.; Costantino, G.; Luro, F.; Dereeper, A.; Mournet, P.; Froelicher, Y.; Ollitrault, P. Genotyping by sequencing can reveal the complex mosaic genomes in gene pools resulting from reticulate evolution: A case study in diploid and polyploid citrus. Ann. Bot. 2019, 123, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, F.; Yu, H.; Tang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Deng, X. Construction of a SNP-based high-density genetic map for pummelo using RAD sequencing. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Curtolo, M.; Soratto, T.A.T.; Gazaffi, R.; Takita, M.A.; Machado, M.A.; Cristofani-Yaly, M. High-density linkage maps for Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata using DArTseq markers. Tree Genet. Genomes 2017, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, M.; Roose, M.L.; Yu, Q.; Du, D.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Z.; Stover, E.; Gmitter, F.G. Construction of high-density genetic maps and detection of QTLs associated with huanglongbing tolerance in citrus. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Ollitrault, P.; Ahmed, D.; Costantino, G.; Evrard, J.C.; Cardi, C.; Mournet, P.; Perdereau, A.; Froelicher, Y. Segregation distortion for male parents in high density genetic maps from reciprocal crosses between two self-incompatible cultivars confirms a gametophytic system for self-incompatibility in citrus. Agriculture 2021, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Curtolo, M.; Cristofani-Yaly, M.; Gazaffi, R.; Takita, M.A.; Figueira, A.; Machado, M.A. QTL mapping for fruit quality in citrus using DArTseq markers. BMC Genomics 2017, 18, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Imai, A.; Nonaka, K.; Kuniga, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Hayashi, T. Genome-wide association mapping of fruit-quality traits using genotyping-by-sequencing approach in citrus landraces, modern cultivars, and breeding lines in Japan. Tree Genet. Genomes 2018, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ollitrault, P.; Terol, J.; Chen, C.; Federici, C.T.; Lotfy, S.; Hippolyte, I.; Ollitrault, F.; Bérard, A.; Chauveau, A.; Cuenca, J.; et al. A reference genetic map of C. clementina hort. ex Tan.; citrus evolution inferences from comparative mapping. BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bernet, G.P.; Fernandez-Ribacoba, J.; Carbonell, E.A.; Asins, M.J. Comparative genome-wide segregation analysis and map construction using a reciprocal cross design to facilitate citrus germplasm utilization. Mol. Breed. 2010, 25, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, Y.; Chen, C.; Gmitter, F.G. QTL mapping of mandarin (Citrus reticulata) fruit characters using high-throughput SNP markers. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yamamoto, M. Progress on studies for seedless breeding of citrus in Japan. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 28, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, H.-J.; Nakagawa, S. Cyto-histological studies on the male sterility of Satsuma orange (Citrus unshiu Marc.). J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1969, 38, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, H.-J.; Nakagawa, S. Studies on the male sterility of Satsuma orange (Citrus unshiu MARC.) Effect of temperature on the recovery of pollen fertility concerning the metabolism of carbohydrates and enzyme activities in anther. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1970, 39, 6–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vithanage, V. Effect of different pollen parents on seediness and quality of ‘Ellendale’ tangor. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 1991, 48, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sumitomo, K.; Shirasawa, K.; Isobe, S.; Hirakawa, H.; Hisamatsu, T.; Nakano, Y.; Yagi, M.; Ohmiya, A. Genome-wide association study overcomes the genome complexity in autohexaploid chrysanthemum and tags SNP markers onto the flower color genes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Shibaya, T.; Kuroda, C.; Tsuruoka, H.; Minami, C.; Obara, A.; Nakayama, S.; Kishida, Y.; Fujii, T.; Isobe, S. Identification of QTLs for root color and carotenoid contents in Japanese orange carrot F2 populations. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Salazar, J.A.; Pacheco, I.; Shinya, P.; Zapata, P.; Silva, C.; Aradhya, M.; Velasco, D.; Ruiz, D.; Martínez-Gómez, P.; Infante, R. Genotyping by sequencing for SNP-based linkage analysis and identification of QTLs linked to fruit quality traits in japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kishore, K.; N., M.; D., R.; Lepcha, B.; Pandey, B. Polyembryony and seedling emergence traits in apomictic citrus. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2012, 138, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Phytozome 13. Available online: https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/ (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  53. Testillano, P.S. Microspore embryogenesis: Targeting the determinant factors of stress-induced cell reprogramming for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2965–2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, H.; Hu, M.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, Z. Role of Papain-like cysteine proteases in plant development. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ku, S.; Yoon, H.; Suh, H.S.; Chung, Y.-Y. Male-sterility of thermosensitive genic male-sterile rice is associated with premature programmed cell death of the tapetum. Planta 2003, 217, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kawanabe, T.; Ariizumi, T.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Uchimiya, H.; Toriyama, K. Abolition of the tapetum suicide program ruins microsporogenesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 784–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Shukla, P.; Singh, N.K.; Kumar, D.; Vijayan, S.; Ahmed, I.; Kirti, P.B. Expression of a pathogen-induced cysteine protease (AdCP) in tapetum results in male sterility in transgenic tobacco. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2014, 14, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shukla, P.; Subhashini, M.; Singh, N.K.; Ahmed, I.; Trishla, S.; Kirti, P.B. Targeted expression of cystatin restores fertility in cysteine protease induced male sterile tobacco plants. Plant Sci. 2016, 246, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Lv, X.; Li, H.; Sun, P.; Lu, H.; Li, F. NtCP56, a new cysteine protease in Nicotiana tabacum L., involved in pollen grain development. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhang, D.; Liu, D.; Lv, X.; Wang, Y.; Xun, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, F.; Lu, H. The Cysteine protease CEP1, a key executor involved in tapetal programmed cell death, regulates pollen development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2939–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yang, Y.; Dong, C.; Yu, J.; Shi, L.; Tong, C.; Li, Z.; Huang, J.; Liu, S. Cysteine Protease 51 (CP51), an anther-specific cysteine protease gene, is essential for pollen exine formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 119, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, J.; Ding, X.; Han, S.; He, T.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Yang, S.; Gai, J. Differential proteomics analysis to identify proteins and pathways associated with male sterility of soybean using iTRAQ-based strategy. J. Proteomics 2016, 138, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Omidvar, V.; Mohorianu, I.; Dalmay, T.; Zheng, Y.; Fei, Z.; Pucci, A.; Mazzucato, A.; Večeřová, V.; Sedlářova, M.; Fellner, M. Transcriptional regulation of male-sterility in 7B-1 male-sterile tomato mutant. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rao, G.S.; Deveshwar, P.; Sharma, M.; Kapoor, S.; Rao, K.V. Evolvement of transgenic male-sterility and fertility-restoration system in rice for production of hybrid varieties. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 96, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xing, M.; Sun, C.; Li, H.; Hu, S.; Lei, L.; Kang, J. Integrated analysis of transcriptome and proteome changes related to the Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility in cabbage. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gautam, R.; Shukla, P.; Kirti, P.B. Targeted expression of a cysteine protease (AdCP) in tapetum induces male sterility in Indian mustard, Brassica juncea. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2019, 19, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gaborieau, L.; Brown, G.G.; Mireau, H. The propensity of pentatricopeptide repeat genes to evolve into restorers of cytoplasmic male sterility. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Chang, Z.; Jin, M.; Yan, W.; Chen, H.; Qiu, S.; Fu, S.; Xia, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, J.; et al. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter OsABCG3 is essential for pollen development in rice. Rice (N. Y.) 2018, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, X.; Makaroff, C.A.; Ma, H. The Arabidopsis MALE MEIOCYTE DEATH1 gene encodes a PHD-finger protein that is required for male meiosis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kumar, S.; Jordan, M.C.; Datla, R.; Cloutier, S. The LuWD40-1 gene encoding WD repeat protein regulates growth and pollen viability in flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jozwiak, A.; Gutkowska, M.; Gawarecka, K.; Surmacz, L.; Buczkowska, A.; Lichocka, M.; Nowakowska, J.; Swiezewska, E. POLYPRENOL REDUCTASE2 deficiency islethal in Arabidopsis due to male sterility. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 3336–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kakui, H.; Tsuchimatsu, T.; Yamazaki, M.; Hatakeyama, M.; Shimizu, K.K. Pollen Number and Ribosome Gene Expression Altered in a Genome-Editing Mutant of REDUCED POLLEN NUMBER1 Gene. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 768584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, N.; Song, X.; Ye, J.; Zhang, S.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, C.; Hu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Cao, S.; et al. Structural variation and parallel evolution of apomixis in citrus during domestication and diversification. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xu, Y.; Jia, H.; Wu, X.; Koltunow, A.M.G.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. Regulation of nucellar embryony, a mode of sporophytic apomixis in Citrus resembling somatic embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 59, 101984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cuenca, J.; Aleza, P.; Garcia-Lor, A.; Ollitrault, P.; Navarro, L. Fine mapping for identification of Citrus Alternaria Brown Spot candidate resistance genes and development of new SNP markers for marker-assisted selection. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Velázquez, K.; Agüero, J.; Vives, M.C.; Aleza, P.; Pina, J.A.; Moreno, P.; Navarro, L.; Guerri, J. Precocious flowering of juvenile citrus induced by a viral vector based on Citrus leaf blotch virus: A new tool for genetics and breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 1976–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Castle, W.S. A career perspective on citrus rootstocks, their development, and commercialization. HortScience Horts 2010, 45, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nishiura, M.; Shichijo, T.; Ueno, I.; Iwamasa, M.; Kihara, T.; Yamada, Y. Kiyomi tangor: A new variety of citrus. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. B 1983, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  79. Aleza, P.; Juárez, J.; Cuenca, J.; Ollitrault, P.; Navarro, L. Recovery of citrus triploid hybrids by embryo rescue and flow cytometry from 2x × 2x sexual hybridisation and its application to extensive breeding programs. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sonah, H.; Bastien, M.; Iquira, E.; Tardivel, A.; Légaré, G.; Boyle, B.; Normandeau, É.; Laroche, J.; Larose, S.; Jean, M.; et al. An improved genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach offering increased versatility and efficiency of SNP discovery and genotyping. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Ritter, E.; Gebhardt, C.; Salamini, F. Estimation of recombination frequencies and construction of RFLP linkage maps in plants from crosses between heterozygous parents. Genetics 1990, 125, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. van Os, H.; Stam, P.; Visser, R.G.F.; van Eck, H.J. SMOOTH: A statistical method for successful removal of genotyping errors from high-density genetic linkage data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 112, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Rasche, H.; Hiltemann, S. Galactic Circos: User-friendly Circos plots within the Galaxy platform. Gigascience 2020, 9, giaa065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Peterson, R.; Slovin, J.P.; Chen, C. A simplified method for differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen grains. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2010, 1, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Alexander, M.P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 1969, 44, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Schindelin, J.; Rueden, C.T.; Hiner, M.C.; Eliceiri, K.W. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 82, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cuppen, E. Genotyping by allele-specific amplification (KASPar). CSH Protoc. 2007, pdb.prot48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Average and standard deviation representation of (a) the number of pollen grains per anther and (b) the percentage of apparent pollen fertility in the ‘Kiyomi’ × ’Murcott‘ offspring phenotyped for male sterility. The x-axis indicates the name of the parents and hybrids.
Figure 1. Average and standard deviation representation of (a) the number of pollen grains per anther and (b) the percentage of apparent pollen fertility in the ‘Kiyomi’ × ’Murcott‘ offspring phenotyped for male sterility. The x-axis indicates the name of the parents and hybrids.
Plants 12 01567 g001
Figure 2. Histogram displaying the number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA) distribution in the diploid hybrids analyzed.
Figure 2. Histogram displaying the number of pollen grains per anther (NPGA) distribution in the diploid hybrids analyzed.
Plants 12 01567 g002
Figure 3. Association study for ‘Murcott’ gametes. (a,b) Number of pollen grains per anther; (a) Manhattan plot. (b) Box plot representation for the most significant marker, SNP S08_4417545. (c,d) Polyembryony. (c) Manhattan plot. (d) Box plot representation for the most significant marker, SNP S01_25165173. The orange line is the threshold for significant p-values.
Figure 3. Association study for ‘Murcott’ gametes. (a,b) Number of pollen grains per anther; (a) Manhattan plot. (b) Box plot representation for the most significant marker, SNP S08_4417545. (c,d) Polyembryony. (c) Manhattan plot. (d) Box plot representation for the most significant marker, SNP S01_25165173. The orange line is the threshold for significant p-values.
Plants 12 01567 g003
Figure 5. (a) Example of a 0.3 μL drop with pollen grains dispersed in the staining solution. (b) Detail of viable pollen grains stained magenta-red, and non-viable pollen grains stained blue-green.
Figure 5. (a) Example of a 0.3 μL drop with pollen grains dispersed in the staining solution. (b) Detail of viable pollen grains stained magenta-red, and non-viable pollen grains stained blue-green.
Plants 12 01567 g005
Table 1. Summary of ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors mapping data.
Table 1. Summary of ‘Kiyomi’ and ‘Murcott’ tangors mapping data.
LG1LG2LG3LG4LG5LG6LG7LG8LG9Total
Kiyomi
No. of SNPs1181893241282145318080881374
Size (cM)96.8141.3237.7112.3219.4107.0152.3189.7159.81416.3
Murcott
No. of SNPs7640759757816016843697
Size (cM)154.5138.6231.3154.6145.4133.2133.9144.8103.41339.7
LG: Linkage group.
Table 2. ANOVA for number of pollen grains per anther and apparent pollen fertility.
Table 2. ANOVA for number of pollen grains per anther and apparent pollen fertility.
Sum of SquaresDfMean SquaresF Ratiop-Value
No. of pollen grains per anther
Between hybrids5.16 × 108529.92 × 1067.60
Within hybrids1.62 × 1081241.30 × 106
Total6.78 × 108176
Apparent pollen fertility
Between hybrids3.58060520.06885761.180.2369
Within hybrids5.40762930.0581465
Total8.98822145
Statistical differences for p < 0.05; Df: degrees of freedom.
Table 4. Horticultural groups with the number of accessions analyzed with the S01_25497528 SNP marker.
Table 4. Horticultural groups with the number of accessions analyzed with the S01_25497528 SNP marker.
Horticultural GroupNumber of AccessionsA:AA:GG:G% Correctly
Assigned
Satsuma mandarin2020100
Clementine mandarin5500100
Mandarin14392100
Sweet Orange9090100
Sour Orange2020100
Grapefruit3030100
Lemon3120100
Lime2020100
Citron3300100
Pummelo3300100
Bergamot1100100
Mandarin hybrid18990100
Tangor6330100
Tangelo4130100
Citrange1010100
Citrumelo11000
Fortunella440025
Poncirus22000
The SNP1 allele linked with polyembryony is G. GG and AG allelic configurations correspond with polyembryonic genotypes, whereas AA allelic configurations are monoembryonic. Detailed information of genotypes and phenotypes is provided in Supplementary Table S8, and the KASPar plot in Supplementary Figure S3.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montalt, R.; Cuenca, J.; Vives, M.C.; Mournet, P.; Navarro, L.; Ollitrault, P.; Aleza, P. Genotyping by Sequencing for SNP-Based Linkage Analysis and the Development of KASPar Markers for Male Sterility and Polyembryony in Citrus. Plants 2023, 12, 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071567

AMA Style

Montalt R, Cuenca J, Vives MC, Mournet P, Navarro L, Ollitrault P, Aleza P. Genotyping by Sequencing for SNP-Based Linkage Analysis and the Development of KASPar Markers for Male Sterility and Polyembryony in Citrus. Plants. 2023; 12(7):1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montalt, Rafael, José Cuenca, María Carmen Vives, Pierre Mournet, Luis Navarro, Patrick Ollitrault, and Pablo Aleza. 2023. "Genotyping by Sequencing for SNP-Based Linkage Analysis and the Development of KASPar Markers for Male Sterility and Polyembryony in Citrus" Plants 12, no. 7: 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071567

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop