Next Article in Journal
Effective Induction of Fertile Gametes in Oriental × Trumpet (OT) Lily by High Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Calmodulin (CaM) and Calmodulin-Like (CML) Genes in the Brown Algae Saccharina japonica
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Prosopis velutina Wooton on the Composition and Diversity of Native Woody Species in a Semi-Arid Zone along the Molopo River, South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Roles of Glutamate Receptor-Like Channels (GLRs) in Plant Growth and Response to Environmental Stimuli
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/plants12071562
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Stress Hormones, Ultraviolet C, and Stilbene Precursors on Expression of Calcineurin B-like Protein (CBL) and CBL-Interacting Protein Kinase (CIPK) Genes in Cell Cultures and Leaves of Vitis amurensis Rupr

by
Konstantin V. Kiselev
1,*,
Olga A. Aleynova
1,
Zlata V. Ogneva
1,
Andrey R. Suprun
1,
Alexey A. Ananev
1,
Nikolay N. Nityagovsky
1,
Alina A. Dneprovskaya
1,2,
Alina A. Beresh
1,2 and
Alexandra S. Dubrovina
1,2
1
Laboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
2
Department of Biotechnology, The School of Natural Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690090, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(7), 1562; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071562
Submission received: 18 March 2023 / Revised: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 5 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calcium Signaling in Plants: Roles in Stress Tolerance and Development)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Calcium serves as a crucial messenger in plant stress adaptation and developmental processes. Plants encode several multigene families of calcium sensor proteins with diverse functions in plant growth and stress responses. Several studies indicated that some calcium sensors may be involved in the regulation of secondary metabolite production in plant cells. The present study aimed to investigate expression of calcineurin B-like proteins (CBL) and CBL-interacting protein kinase (CIPK) in response to conditions inducting biosynthesis of stilbenes in grapevine. We investigated CBL and CIPK gene expression in wild-growing grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr., known as a rich stilbene source, in response to the application of stilbene biosynthesis-inducing conditions, including application of stress hormones (salicylic acid or SA, methyl jasmonate or MeJA), phenolic precursors (p-coumaric acids or CA), and ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C). The influence of these effectors on the levels of 13 VaCBL and 27 VaCIPK mRNA transcripts as well as on stilbene production was analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in the leaves and cell cultures of V. amurensis. The data revealed that VaCBL4-1 expression considerably increased after UV-C treatment in both grapevine cell cultures and leaves. The expression of VaCIPK31, 41-1, and 41-2 also increased, but this increase was mostly detected in cell cultures of V. amurensis. At the same time, expression of most VaCBL and VaCIPK genes was markedly down-regulated both in leaves and cell cultures of V. amurensis, which may indicate that the CBLs and CIPKs are involved in negative regulation of stilbene accumulation (VaCBL8, 10a-2, 10a-4, 11, 12, VaCIPK3, 9-1, 9-2, 12, 21-1, 21-2, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41-3, 41-4). The results obtained provide new information of CBL and CIPK implication in the regulation of plant secondary metabolism in response to stress hormones, metabolite precursors, and UV-C irradiation.

1. Introduction

Calcium serves as a crucial messenger in plant responses to environmental stresses and many developmental processes, including pollen tube elongation, cell polarity after fertilization, cell division, seed germination, apoptosis, phytohormone responses, senescence, abiotic stress tolerance, pathogens, etc. [1,2,3].
The plant calcium sensor proteins include calmodulins (CaMs), calmodulin-like proteins (CML), calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBL), and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPK) [4,5,6]. There are scarce data on the functions and regulation of the CBL–CIPK calcium signaling network. A novel type of calcium sensor, termed as CBLs, was identified in plant cells 20 years ago [7]. CBLs specifically target a family of plant-specific CIPK. To decode a calcium signal, CBL binds Ca2+ and interacts with CIPK, leading to activation of the kinase. Then, the CBL–CIPK complex phosphorylates downstream target proteins and changes their biological activities [8]. Data from the current literature report on the functions of the plant CBL–CIPK network in mineral uptake, stomatal movement, pH regulation, maintenance of Na+/K+ homeostasis, etc. [8].
Ishitani et al. [9] demonstrated that the CBL4–CIPK24 complex of Arabidopsis thaliana migrated to the plasma membrane where it activated the Na+/H+ antiporter (SOS1) located on the plasma membrane and the vacuolar H+-ATPase, resulting in enhanced plant salt tolerance. Other CBL–CIPK complexes have been studied in Arabidopsis, such as CBL1/CBL9–CIPK23 that was observed to localize to the plasma membrane and regulate K+ in roots and stomatal guard cells [10]. Overexpression of OsCBL8 and OsCIPK15 in rice enhanced plant salt tolerance [11]. OsCIPK31 mutants exhibited hypersensitive phenotypes to abscisic acid (ABA), salt, mannitol, and glucose. Compared with wild-type rice plants, OsCIPK31 mutants exhibited retarded germination and slow seedling growth [12]. Moreover, TaCIPK23 has been shown to participate in wheat cell signaling in response to ABA and drought by mediating the crosstalk between ABA-induced signaling and other pathways associated with adaptation to drought [13]. In potatoes, StCIPK10 has been shown to enhance both cellular scavenging of reactive oxygen species and cellular modulation of corresponding osmoregulatory substances to strengthen plant drought and osmotic stress tolerance [14].
A number of articles have shown that plant calcium sensor proteins, such as CDPKs and CMLs, are involved in the plant pathogen response [15,16] and plant defense tools such as secondary metabolite production [17]. It is proposed that CDPKs are involved in stress hormone- and light-mediated activation of plant defense reactions and secondary metabolite production in response to biotic and abiotic cues [16]. Considering CBL and CIPK, there is scarce information on their involvement in plant defense reactions. It is known that overexpression of StCBL4 and StCIPK2 individually and synergistically increased the tolerance of potato plants to soilborne plant pathogen fungi Rhizoctonia solani in Nicotiana benthamiana [18].
Knockdown of the TaCIPK14 gene in wheat significantly increased wheat resistance to the pathogenic fungus Puccinia striiformis (Pst), whereas overexpression of TaCIPK14 resulted in enhanced wheat susceptibility to Pst by decreasing different aspects of the defense response, including accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and expression of pathogenesis-relative genes [19]. Currently, there is no information about CBL–CIPK participation in the regulation of biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites.
In this study, we aimed for a comprehensive analysis of CBL and CIPK gene expression in the wild-growing grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr. under the treatments inducing active production of stilbenes, which are important defense compounds in grapevines and some other plant families [20,21]. For this, we induced stilbene biosynthesis using stress hormones, ultraviolet C irradiation, and stilbene precursors to measure CBL and CIPK mRNA levels by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) in the leaves and callus cell culture of V. amurensis.

2. Results

2.1. Stilbene Content in V. Amurensis after SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C Treatments

To test the involvement of VaCBL and VaCIPK genes in the regulation of stilbene synthesis in grapevine, we exposed vine cuttings and calli V. amurensis to different doses of SA, MeJA, stilbene precursors, and UV-C. We used experimental design and chemical concentrations for stress hormones (salicylic acid or SA, methyl jasmonate or MeJA), CA, and UV-C as described [22,23,24,25]. Previously, we found that the doses of the treatments (50–200 µM for SA and MeJA, 100–500 µM for CA, and 20 min at a wavelength of 254 nm, 230 µW cm−2, 15 cm from the UV-C lamp) exhibited the highest stimulating effect on stilbene biosynthesis. The highest stilbene content in the leaves of V. amurensis vines was observed 24 h after MeJA or UV-C treatments [26,27]. The highest stilbene content in callus cell cultures of V. amurensis was detected at 35 day of cultivation [22,28]. Therefore, we used the same time periods for stilbene analysis.
First, we analyzed the composition of stilbenes in the leaves and V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis. The V7 callus cultures were established in 2017 from young stems of mature V. amurensis vines [29]. The HPLC analysis revealed the presence of eight major stilbenoids in the tissues of V. amurensis at a concentration of 0.001 mg/g DW or higher (Figure 1, Table S1). It is possible that other stilbenes were present in the analyzed tissues of V. amurensis, but in trace amounts (less than 0.001 µg/g DW). The main focus of the present paper was to analyze the repertoire and content of the major stilbenes, and, therefore, we analyzed the content of the above-mentioned compounds.
The V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis produced these eight stilbenes (Figure 1, Table S1), among which five stilbenes (t-resveratrol diglucoside, t-piceid, t-resveratrol, ε-viniferin, and δ-viniferin) were present at consistently high levels (Figure 1, Table S1). Moreover, t-resveratrol diglucoside (0.23–1.31 mg/g DW, 40.0–65.1% of all detected stilbenes) was specific to the calli of V. amurensis and was not found in the grapevine leaves [20]. However, cis-piceid, t-piceatannol, and cis-resveratrol were present in trace amounts in the calli of V. amurensis. Only UV-C irradiation considerably increased the total content of stilbenes to 0.2–0.3 mg/g DW (Table S1).
The leaves of V. amurensis were characterized by the presence of seven major stilbenes (Figure 1, Table S1), including t-piceid, cis-piceid, t-piceatannol, t-resveratrol, cis-resveratrol, ε-viniferin, and δ-viniferin. Among all detected stilbenes, five compounds (t-piceid, cis-piceid, t-resveratrol, cis-resveratrol, and ε-viniferin) were present at consistently high values (up to 0.16 mg/g DW), especially after CA or UV-C application (Figure 1, Table S1). t-piceatannol and δ-viniferin were present at low levels, no more 0.01 mg/g DW, in all samples of grapevine leaves and callus cell culture (Table S1).
All treatments considerably increased total stilbene content in both the cell culture and leaves of V. amurensis (Figure 2, Table S1). In the calli of V. amurensis, the content of stilbenes increased most significantly after application of MeJA (200 µM) and UV-C (24 h post-treatment), up to 2.3–3.2 mg/g DW, which is 10.2- and 14.1-fold higher than in the untreated control calli, respectively (Figure 1a). For the leaves of V. amurensis, the highest stimulating effect on stilbene biosynthesis was provided by the application of SA (200 µM), CA (200 µM), and UV-C (24 h) with the increase in stilbene levels by 4.4, 5.4, and 5.5 times in comparison with the untreated control leaves, respectively (Figure 1b). We found that the UV-C treatment had the highest positive effect on stilbene biosynthesis compared with the effects of MeJA, SA, and CA, potentially due to the involvement of stilbenes in plant UV protection [20].
A detailed analysis of the individual stilbenes in the V7 probes (Table S1) revealed that the significant increase in the total stilbene content after all treatments was mainly due to an increase in the content of viniferins (ε- and δ-viniferin), t-resveratrol, and t-resveratrol diglucoside (Table S1), while in the leaves, the content of viniferins (ε- and δ-viniferin), t-resveratrol, and t-piceid was mostly enhanced after all used treatments (Table S1).

2.2. CBL and CIPK Expression after SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C Treatments

Previously, eight CBL genes were described based on the well-known genome of cultivated grapevine V. vinifera [30]. However, in the NCBI GeneBank, two transcripts are associated with the CBL4 gene of V. vinifera, four transcripts with the CBL10a gene, and two transcripts with the CBL13 gene. These transcripts differed in the 3′-end of the CBL coding region and included modifications of the last exon (Figure S1), which resembled splicing-related variations. The specific primers were designed for all CBL transcripts found in the NCBI database (Table S2). Thus, we analyzed the levels of 13 VaCBL transcript variants (Figure 3).
The qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the level of VaCBL4-1 transcript considerably increased at all time points after UV-C treatment both in the V7 cell culture and grapevine leaves (Figure 3a,b). The levels of VaCBL5, VaCBL10a-3, and VaCBL13-1 transcripts also considerably increased at both doses of SA (VaCBL10a-3) and MeJA (VaCBL5, VaCBL10a-3, VaCBL13-1), but this increase was detected only in cell cultures (Figure 3a). The levels of other VaCBL transcript variants were not significantly changed after the SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C treatments of the grapevine V. amurensis cell cultures (Figure 3a). In contrast to the cell cultures, the treatments of V. amurensis vine cuttings led to a significant decrease in the levels of the most VaCBL transcripts (Figure 3b). Furthermore, expression of VaCBL10a-1, 10b, and 13-3 transcripts increased in some individual probes (Figure 3). It is possible that VaCBL4-1 is implicated in stilbene biosynthesis in grapevines as a positive regulator in response to UV-C irradiation. Transcripts VaCBL10a-1, 10b, and 13-3, VaCBL5, VaCBL10a-3, and VaCBL13-1 may also have a slight positive effect on the biosynthesis of stilbenes, because their expression increased with only one dose of the used inductors (Figure 3).
The data obtained revealed that expression levels of five VaCBLs considerably decreased at both doses of the used stilbene biosynthesis inductors in the leaves of V. amurensis, including VaCBL8 (UV-C), VaCBL10a-2 (MeJA, CA), VaCBL10a-4 (MeJA), VaCBL11 (UV-C), and VaCBL12 (MeJA) transcripts (Figure 3b). Furthermore, down-regulation of CBL transcript levels was detected at individual doses for the VaCBL4-2, VaCBL5, and VaCBL10a-4 (Figure 3).
Then, we analyzed transcript levels of VaCIPK genes in response to SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C (Figure 4). Previously, 20 CIPK genes were described for grapevines based on the well-known genome of cultivated grapevine V. vinifera [30]. However, in the NCBI GeneBank, two transcripts are associated with the CIPK9 gene of V. vinifera, two transcripts—with the CIPK21 gene, and six transcripts—with the CIPK41 gene. These transcripts differ in the 3′-end of the CBL coding region and include modifications of the last exon (Figure S1). The specific primers were designed for all CBL transcripts found in the NCBI database (Table S2). Thus, we analyzed the levels of 27 VaCIPK transcript variants (Figure 3).
Similarly, to VaCBLs, transcript levels of most VaCIPKs considerably decreased after the application of SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C (Figure 4), which was expected due to the known CBL–CIPK interaction. Therefore, the list of calcium sensor genes negatively regulating stilbene accumulation also includes VaCIPK3, 9-1, 9-2, 12, 21-1, 21-2, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41-3, and 41-4. However, there were several VaCIPKs with considerably elevated transcript levels in response to SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C application, including VaCIPK31, VaCIPK41-1, and VaCIPK41-2 (Figure 4a). Therefore, VaCIPK31 (increased after MeJA treatment), VaCIPK41-1 (increased after MeJA), and VaCIPK41-2 (increased after CA) may play a role in the activation of stilbene accumulation in response to MeJA and CA. Furthermore, we detected the activation of VaCIPK29, VaCIPK32, VaCIPK38, VaCIPK41-5, and VaCIPK41-6 transcript levels after application of only one dose of the CA, SA, UV-C, and MeJA treatments in grapevine cell cultures and leaves (Figure 4a).

3. Discussion

Previous data revealed the involvement of some CDPK and CML genes in the regulation of stilbene production in V. amurensis [29,31,32]. Five families of calcium sensor genes are known in plants; these are CDPK, CaM, CML, CBL, and CIPK [4,5,6]. Expression of CDPK, CaM, and CML was studied in grapevine tissues under stilbene biosynthesis-inducing conditions, including stress hormones (SA and MeJA), phenolic precursors (CA), UV-C, transformation by agrobacterium rol genes, leading to a strong increase in stilbene accumulation [29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Thus, together with this study, the expression of main plant calcium sensors has been studied in grapevine cell cultures and leaves under conditions inducing stilbene biosynthesis.
It has been shown that the plant transformation with the rol genes of Agrobacterium rhizogenes was accompanied by a strong increase in t-resveratrol content and activation of the expression of VaCDPK1d, VaCDPK1e, VaCDPK1-L, and VaCDPK2a genes [34]. A number of CML genes, such as VaCML52, VaCML65, VaCML93, and VaCML95 [29], were highly up-regulated in the leaves and cell cultures of wild grapevine V. amurensis in the stilbene-modulating conditions. At the same time, CaM gene expression did not increase significantly [29].
A number of studies revealed that overexpression of the AtCPK1 gene from A. thaliana contributes to a significant increase in the content of isoflavonoids in soybean [38]. Overexpression of AeCDPK6 promoted hyperoside (flavonol, 3-O-galactoside of quercetin) accumulation in an AeMYB30-dependent manner in the flowers of okra plants [39]. The grapevine V. amurensis calli overexpressing the VaCPK1, VaCPK26, and VaCPK20 genes were capable of producing up to 0.6, 0.4, and 4.2 mg/g DW of t-resveratrol, respectively [31,36]. However, overexpression of other CDPK genes in grapevine callus cultures did not significantly affect the biosynthesis of stilbenes [37]. For CMLs, it has been shown that overexpression of the VaCML65 gene led to a considerable and consistent increase in the content of stilbenes of 3.8–23.7 times (up to 19 mg/g DW of total stilbenes or up to 18 mg/g DW of t-resveratrol) in all transformed lines [32].
In this work, the expression of VaCBLs and VaCIPKs has been analyzed after treatment with SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C. Taken together, the data obtained in this study indicated that several VaCBLs (VaCBL4-1, VaCBL10a-3, VaCBL13-1) and VaCIPKs (VaCIPK31, VaCIPK41-1, VaCIPK41-2) can be considered as possible positive activators of stilbene biosynthesis, because their expression was considerably increased in after stilbene biosynthesis induction. The VaCBL4-1 transcript is the most interesting candidate in the positive regulation of stilbene biosynthesis, because the VaCBL4-1 transcript level markedly increased at all time points both in cell culture and grapevine leaves after UV-C treatment, which is the strongest inductor of stilbene biosynthesis (Figure 3). At the same time, the number of CBLs probably involved in negative regulation of stilbene accumulation is greater than the number of CBLs involved in the stimulation of stilbene accumulation. The results revealed that a high number of VaCBL (VaCBL8, 10a-2, 10a-4, 11, 12) and VaCIPK (VaCIPK3, 9-1, 9-2, 12, 21-1, 21-2, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41-3, 41-4) family members may act as possible blockers of stilbene biosynthesis, since expression of these genes markedly decreased in the probes with high stilbene content. These genes are perhaps involved in grapevine primary metabolism and are responsible for growth and development regulation, since expression of these genes is suspended under the imposed stress caused by the stress hormones, stilbene precursors, and UV-C. In general, these findings need to be verified in future studies, potentially by establishing transgenic plants or plant cell cultures overexpressing the CBLs or CIPKs genes.
In conclusion, this study indicates the role of some CBL and CIPK family members in the regulation of secondary metabolite production in plant cells and provides new data on stilbene biosynthesis regulation in grapevines. According to this study, several CBL and CIPK genes can be used in biotechnology as stimulators for stilbene biosynthesis in plant cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. V. amurensis Plant Material

We used young vines of wild-growing grapevine V. amurensis Rupr. (Vitaceae) sampled from a non-protected natural population near Vladivostok, Russia [40]. The V. amurensis vines collected in June 2022 were divided into cuttings (excised young stems 7–8 cm long with one healthy leaf) that were placed in individual 100 mL beakers with 50 mL filtered water and used for the treatments. The cuttings of V. amurensis were grown under a photoperiod of 11/13 h light/dark at a light intensity of 70 μmol m−2s−1 at 15 °C and darkness at 10 °C, humidity 60–70%.
The V7 callus cultures were established in 2017 from young stems of mature V. amurensis vines as described [29]. For stilbene analysis, the V7 calli were cultivated with 35-day subculture intervals in the dark at 24–25 °C in test tubes (height 150 mm, internal diameter 146 mm) with 7–8 mL of the solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) modified WB/A medium [41,42] supplemented with 0.5 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine, 2 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid, and 8 g/L agar.

4.2. Plant Treatments and Chemicals

Sterile solutions of SA diluted in ethyl alcohol, MeJA and CA diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were added aseptically to desired concentrations (50 and 200 µM of SA and MeJA, 100 and 500 µM of CA) to the autoclaved cultivated media for cell cultures or to the filtered water for the vine cuttings of V. amurensis. DMSO (200 µL/L) or ethyl alcohol (200 µL/L) were added for the control treatments (V7 or L). The UV-C treatments were conducted for 20 min at a wavelength of 254 nm (230 µW cm−2, 15 cm from the lamp) in the dark using UV lamp VL-215.MC provided by Vilber Lourmat company (Marne-la-Vallée, France) as described [24]. Control V. amurensis cuttings were placed in the dark in individual 100 mL beakers with 50 mL filtered water. After the UV-C treatments, the treated and control cuttings were grown under a photoperiod of 11/13-h light (70 μmol m−2s−1, 15 °C)/dark (10 °C) for 1 h and 24 h.

4.3. Stilbene Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Mass Spectrometry

Total stilbene content was measured by HPLC as described [43,44]. Briefly, the extracts were separated on Zorbax C18 column (150 mm, 2.1-mm i.d., 3.5-lm part size, Agilent Technologies, USA). The mobile phase consisted of a gradient elution of 0.1% aqueous acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient profile with a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min was: 0 min 0% B; 35 min 40% B; 40 min 50% B; 50 min 100% B; and then eluent B for 60 min. Mass spectrometry was performed using a 1260 Infinity analytical system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for quantification of all components as described [43]. HPLC was performed using LC-20 analytical HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with an SPD-M20A photodiode array detector, LC-20ADXR pump, Shim-pack XR-ODS II column and SIL-20ACXR auto sampler for quantification of all components as described [44].

4.4. RNA Isolation, Reverse Transcription, and Expression Analysis of VaCBLs and VaCIPKs

Total RNA extraction was performed using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based extraction as described [33]. Complementary DNAs were synthesized using 1.5 µg of RNA by the MMLV Reverse Transcription PCR Kit with oligo(dT)15 (RT-PCR, Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). The RT-PCR reactions were performed in 50 µL aliquots of the reaction mixture, which contained 1 × RT buffer, 1 mM each of the 4 dNTPs, 2 µM of dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 µM of oligo(dT)15 primer, 250 U of MMLV-polymerase at 37 °C for 1.5 h. The 1 µL samples of reverse transcription products were then amplified by qPCR.
qRT-PCRs were performed using a real-time PCR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) and SYBR Green I for qRT-PCR (Evrogen, Russia) using cDNAs as described [40,44]. The expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method [45] with two internal controls (VaGAPDH and VaActin1) in all experiments as described [40]. qRT-PCR data were obtained from free independent experiments and are averages of 12 technical replicates for each independent experiment (6 qPCR reactions normalized to VaGAPDH and 6 qPCR reactions normalized to VaActin1 expression). Expression data are presented as a heatmap map in the program ComplexHeatmap [46]. The specific primers were designed for all CBL and CIPK transcripts of V. vinifera found in the NCBI database (Table S2) according to the previously published paper [30].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12071562/s1, Table S1: Individual stilbene content (mg/g of dry weight, DW) in the Vitis amurensis cell culture V7 and leaves in control conditions (V7, L) and after salicylic acid (SA 50, SA 200 µM), methyl jasmonate acid (MeJA 50, MeJA 200 µM), p-coumaric acids acid (CA 100, CA 500 µM) feeding, and after ultraviolet C treatment (UV-C 1 h, UV-C 24 h). Table S2: Individual calcineurin B-like proteins (CBL) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPK) genes and their known transcripts in grapevines [30]. Figure S1: Nucleotide sequence of the VvCBL and VaCIPK transcripts.

Author Contributions

K.V.K. and A.S.D. performed the research design, interpretation and paper preparation. O.A.A., A.A.D. and A.A.B. carried out the RNA isolations, experiments with cell cultures and plants, and data analysis. A.R.S. conducted the HPLC analysis. N.N.N. carried out the statistical analysis and prepared the figures. Z.V.O. and A.A.A. performed the qRT-PCRs and participated in the data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation # 22-16-00078, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-16-00078/ (accessed on 4 April 2023).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Calcium in plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Choi, W.G.; Hilleary, R.; Swanson, S.J.; Kim, S.H.; Gilroy, S. Rapid, long-distance electrical and calcium signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 287–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kudla, J.; Becker, D.; Grill, E.; Hedrich, R.; Hippler, M.; Kummer, U.; Parniske, M.; Romeis, T.; Schumacher, K. Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hashimoto, K.; Kudla, J. Calcium decoding mechanisms in plants. Biochimie 2011, 93, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. DeFalco, T.A.; Bender, K.W.; Snedden, W.A. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signaling. Biochem. J. 2010, 425, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mohanta, T.K.; Yadav, D.; Khan, A.L.; Hashem, A.; Allah, E.F.A.; Al-Harrasi, A. Molecular players of EF-hand containing calcium signaling event in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kudla, J.; Xu, Q.; Harter, K.; Luan, S. Genes for calcineurin B-like proteins in Arabidopsis are differentially regulated by stress signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4718–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tang, R.J.; Wang, C.; Li, K.; Luan, S. The CBL–CIPK calcium signaling network: Unified paradigm from 20 years of discoveries. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 256, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishitani, M.; Liu, J.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Shi, W.; Zhu, J.K. SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium binding. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1667–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cheong, Y.H.; Pandey, G.K.; Grant, J.J.; Batistic, O.; Li, L.; Kim, B.G.; Lee, S.-C.; Kudla, J.; Luan, S. Two calcineurin B-like calcium sensors, interacting with protein kinase CIPK23, regulate leaf transpiration and root potassium uptake in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 52, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, L. Characterization of stress-responsive CIPK genes in rice for stress tolerance improvement. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1416–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Piao, H.; Xuan, Y.; Park, S.H.; Je, B.I.; Park, S.J.; Park, S.H.; Kim, C.M.; Huang, J.; Wang, G.K.; Kim, M.J.; et al. OsCIPK31, a CBL-interacting protein kinase is involved in germination and seedling growth under abiotic stress conditions in rice plants. Mol. Cells 2010, 30, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cui, X.Y.; Du, Y.T.; Fu, J.D.; Yu, T.F.; Wang, C.T.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.Z.; Xu, Z.S. Wheat CBL-nteracting protein kinase 23 positively regulates drought stress and ABA responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ma, R.; Liu, W.; Li, S.; Zhu, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the CIPK gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and the role of StCIPK10 in response to drought and osmotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boudsocq, M.; Sheen, J. CDPKs in Immune and Stress Signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schulz, P.; Herde, M.; Romeis, T. Calcium-dependent protein kinases: Hubs in plant stress signaling and development. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Cheng, S.H.; Sheen, J.; Gerrish, C.; Bolwell, G.P. Molecular identification of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase as a substrate of a specific constitutively active Arabidopsis CDPK expressed in maize protoplasts. FEBS Lett. 2001, 503, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yang, S.; Li, J.; Lu, J.; Wang, L.; Min, F.; Guo, M.; Wei, Q.; Wang, W.; Dong, X.; Mao, Y.; et al. Potato calcineurin B-like protein CBL4, interacting with calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase CIPK2, positively regulates plant resistance to stem canker caused by Rhizoctonia solani . Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1032900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, F.; Wang, C.; Sun, H.; Tian, S.; Zhao, G.; Liu, C.; Wan, C.; Guo, J.; Huang, X.; Zhan, G.; et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeologues of TaCIPK14 confers broad-spectrum resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V. Regulation of stilbene biosynthesis in plants. Planta 2017, 346, 597–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jeandet, P.; Delaunois, B.; Conreux, A.; Donnez, D.; Nuzzo, V.; Cordelier, S.; Clément, C.; Courot, E. Biosynthesis, metabolism, molecular engineering, and biological functions of stilbene phytoalexins in plants. Biofactors 2010, 36, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kiselev, K.V.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Veselova, M.V.; Bulgakov, V.P.; Fedoreyev, S.A.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. The rolB gene-induced overproduction of resveratrol in Vitis amurensis transformed cells. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tyunin, A.P.; Kiselev, K.V. Alternations in VaSTS gene cytosine methylation and t-resveratrol production in response to UV-C irradiation in Vitis amurensis Rupr. cells. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 124, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kiselev, K.V.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Dubrovina, A.S. Action of ultraviolet-C radiation and p-coumaric acid on stilbene accumulation and expression of stilbene biosynthesis-related genes in the grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr. Acta Physiol. Plant 2019, 41, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kiselev, K.V.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Dubrovina, A.S. The effect of ultraviolet-C and precursor feeding on stilbene biosynthesis in spruce Picea jezoensis. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 234–235, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, K.; Liao, Y.; Kan, J.; Han, L.; Zheng, Y. Response of direct or priming defense against Botrytis cinerea to methyl jasmonate treatment at different concentrations in grape berries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 194, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xi, H.F.; Ma, L.; Wang, L.N.; Li, S.H.; Wang, L.J. Differential response of the biosynthesis of resveratrols and flavonoids to UV-C irradiation in grape leaves. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2015, 43, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suprun, A.R.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V. Effect of spruce PjSTS1a, PjSTS2, or PjSTS3 gene overexpression on stilbene biosynthesis in callus cultures of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2020, 67, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kiselev, K.V.; Aleynova, O.A.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Ananev, A.A.; Nityagovsky, N.N.; Dubrovina, A.S. The effect of stress hormones, UV-C, and stilbene precursors on calmodulin (CaM) and calmodulin-like gene (CML) expression in Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 146, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xi, Y.; Liu, J.; Dong, C.; Cheng, Z.M. The CBL and CIPK gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera): Genome-wide analysis and expression profiles in response to various abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aleynova-Shumakova, O.A.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Manyakhin, A.Y.; Karetin, Y.A.; Kiselev, K.V. VaCPK20 gene overexpression significantly increased resveratrol content and expression of stilbene synthase genes in cell cultures of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5541–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aleynova, O.A.; Suprun, A.R.; Ananev, A.A.; Nityagovsky, N.N.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V. Effect of calmodulin-like gene (CML) overexpression on stilbene biosynthesis in cell cultures of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plants 2022, 11, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kiselev, K.V.; Shumakova, O.A.; Manyakhin, A.Y. Effects of the calmodulin antagonist W7 on resveratrol biosynthesis in Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 31, 1569–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V.; Veselova, M.V.; Isaeva, G.A.; Fedoreyev, S.A.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. Enhanced resveratrol accumulation in rolB transgenic cultures of Vitis amurensis correlates with unusual changes in CDPK gene expression. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1194–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aleynova, O.A.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Manyakhin, A.Y.; Karetin, Y.A.; Kiselev, K.V. Regulation of resveratrol production in Vitis amurensis cell cultures by calcium-dependent protein kinases. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2015, 175, 1460–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Aleynova, O.A.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V. Activation of stilbene synthesis in cell cultures of Vitis amurensis by calcium-dependent protein kinases VaCPK1 and VaCPK26. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 130, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dubrovina, A.S.; Aleynova, O.A.; Manyakhin, A.Y.; Kiselev, K.V. The role of calcium-dependent protein kinase genes CPK16, CPK25, CPK30, and CPK32 in stilbene biosynthesis and the stress resistance of grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2018, 54, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Veremeichik, G.N.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Silanteva, S.A.; Shkryl, Y.N.; Bulgakov, D.V.; Brodovskaya, E.V.; Bulgakov, V.P. Increase in isoflavonoid content in Glycine max cells transformed by the constitutively active Ca2+ independent form of the AtCPK1 gene. Phytochemistry 2019, 157, 16280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Q.; Dong, B.; Wang, L.; Song, Z.; Niu, L.; Li, H.; Cao, H.; Meng, D.; Fu, Y. CDPK6 phosphorylates and stabilizes MYB30 to promote hyperoside biosynthesis that prolongs the duration of full-blooming in okra. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4042–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dubrovina, A.S.; Aleynova, O.A.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Ananev, A.A.; Kiselev, K.V. The effect of abiotic stress conditions on expression of calmodulin (CaM) and calmodulin-like (CML) genes in wild-growing grapevine Vitis amurensis. Plants 2019, 8, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dubrovina, A.S.; Manyakhin, A.Y.; Zhuravlev, Y.N.; Kiselev, K.V. Resveratrol content and expression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and stilbene synthase genes in rolC transgenic cell cultures of Vitis amurensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tyunin, A.P.; Suprun, A.R.; Nityagovsky, N.N.; Manyakhin, A.Y.; Karetin, Y.A.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V. The effect of explant origin and collection season on stilbene biosynthesis in cell cultures of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 136, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aleynova, O.A.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Dubrovina, A.S.; Rybin, V.G.; Kiselev, K.V. Stilbene accumulation in cell cultures of Vitis amurensis Rupr. overexpressing VaSTS1, VaSTS2, and VaSTS7 genes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 125, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kiselev, K.V.; Aleynova, O.A.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Dubrovina, A.S. Stilbene accumulation and expression of stilbene biosynthesis pathway genes in wild grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr. Planta 2017, 245, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gu, Z.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2847–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 12 01562 g001 550
Figure 1. A representative HPLC-UV profile for the extracts obtained from Vitis amurensis and recorded at 310 nm. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis after ultraviolet C irradiation. t-resveratrol diglucoside (1), t-piceid or t-resveratrol glucoside (2), cis-piceid or cis-resveratrol glucoside (3), t-piceatannol (4), t-resveratrol (5), cis-resveratrol (6), ε-viniferin (7), δ-viniferin (8). (*) The compound was similar in retention time to t-resveratrol diglucoside, but showed other parameters of UV absorption spectrum (310 nm).
Figure 1. A representative HPLC-UV profile for the extracts obtained from Vitis amurensis and recorded at 310 nm. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis after ultraviolet C irradiation. t-resveratrol diglucoside (1), t-piceid or t-resveratrol glucoside (2), cis-piceid or cis-resveratrol glucoside (3), t-piceatannol (4), t-resveratrol (5), cis-resveratrol (6), ε-viniferin (7), δ-viniferin (8). (*) The compound was similar in retention time to t-resveratrol diglucoside, but showed other parameters of UV absorption spectrum (310 nm).
Plants 12 01562 g001
Plants 12 01562 g002 550
Figure 2. Total stilbene content in the cell culture and leaves of Vitis amurensis after treatments with salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA 50, MeJA 200 µM), p-coumaric acid (CA 0.1, CA 0.5 mM) and ultraviolet C irradiation (UV 1 h, UV 24 h). (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. L or V7—control conditions; SA 50 and SA 200—salicylic acid 50 and 200 µM; MeJA 50 and 200—methyl jasmonate 50 and 200 µM; CA 100 and 500—p-coumaric acid 100 and 500 µM; UV 1 h and UV 24 h—ultraviolet C irradiation. The leaves of V. amurensis samples were harvested 24 h after SA, MeJA, or CA application and 1 h/24 h after UV-C irradiation. The calli samples were harvested from the 35-day-old cell culture V7 of V. amurensis growing in in the presence of SA, MeJA, or CA or 1 h/24 h after UV-C irradiation. *—p < 0.05; **—p < 0.01 versus values of total stilbene levels in the V7 cell line or in grape leaves cultivated under control conditions.
Figure 2. Total stilbene content in the cell culture and leaves of Vitis amurensis after treatments with salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA 50, MeJA 200 µM), p-coumaric acid (CA 0.1, CA 0.5 mM) and ultraviolet C irradiation (UV 1 h, UV 24 h). (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. L or V7—control conditions; SA 50 and SA 200—salicylic acid 50 and 200 µM; MeJA 50 and 200—methyl jasmonate 50 and 200 µM; CA 100 and 500—p-coumaric acid 100 and 500 µM; UV 1 h and UV 24 h—ultraviolet C irradiation. The leaves of V. amurensis samples were harvested 24 h after SA, MeJA, or CA application and 1 h/24 h after UV-C irradiation. The calli samples were harvested from the 35-day-old cell culture V7 of V. amurensis growing in in the presence of SA, MeJA, or CA or 1 h/24 h after UV-C irradiation. *—p < 0.05; **—p < 0.01 versus values of total stilbene levels in the V7 cell line or in grape leaves cultivated under control conditions.
Plants 12 01562 g002
Plants 12 01562 g003 550
Figure 3. Heatmap of VaCBL expression levels in Vitis amurensis after salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), p-coumaric acid (CA) and ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) treatments. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. The VaCBL transcript levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The color scale represents increased (green) and decreased (red) changes of the expression values under the SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C treatments relative to the control. V7 and L—control non-treated conditions (for V7 cell cultures 35 d growth in WB/A medium; for leaves—24 h in filtered water at 25 °C); SA 50 and SA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of SA; MeJA 50 and MeJA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of MeJA; CA 0.1 and 0.5—supplemented with 100 and 500 µM of CA; UV 1 h and 24 h—1 h or 24 h after UV-C irradiation. *, **—significantly different from the values of VaCBL expression in V. amurensis cells under the control conditions (V7 or L) at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01 according to the Student’s t-test.
Figure 3. Heatmap of VaCBL expression levels in Vitis amurensis after salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), p-coumaric acid (CA) and ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) treatments. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. The VaCBL transcript levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The color scale represents increased (green) and decreased (red) changes of the expression values under the SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C treatments relative to the control. V7 and L—control non-treated conditions (for V7 cell cultures 35 d growth in WB/A medium; for leaves—24 h in filtered water at 25 °C); SA 50 and SA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of SA; MeJA 50 and MeJA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of MeJA; CA 0.1 and 0.5—supplemented with 100 and 500 µM of CA; UV 1 h and 24 h—1 h or 24 h after UV-C irradiation. *, **—significantly different from the values of VaCBL expression in V. amurensis cells under the control conditions (V7 or L) at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01 according to the Student’s t-test.
Plants 12 01562 g003
Plants 12 01562 g004 550
Figure 4. Heatmap of VaCIPK expression levels in Vitis amurensis after salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), p-coumaric acid (CA) and ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) treatments. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. The VaCBL transcript levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The color scale represents increased (green) and decreased (red) changes of the expression values under the SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C treatments relative to the control. V7 and L—control non-treated conditions (for V7 cell cultures 35 d growth in WB/A medium; for leaves—24 h in filtered water at 25 °C); SA 50 and SA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of SA; MeJA 50 and MeJA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of MeJA; CA 0.1 and 0.5—supplemented with 100 and 500 µM of CA; UV 1 h and 24 h—1 h or 24 h after UV-C irradiation. *, **—significantly different from the values of VaCIPK expression in V. amurensis cells under the control conditions (V7 or L) at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01 according to the Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Heatmap of VaCIPK expression levels in Vitis amurensis after salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), p-coumaric acid (CA) and ultraviolet irradiation (UV-C) treatments. (a) V7 callus cell culture of V. amurensis; (b) leaves of V. amurensis. The VaCBL transcript levels were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The color scale represents increased (green) and decreased (red) changes of the expression values under the SA, MeJA, CA, and UV-C treatments relative to the control. V7 and L—control non-treated conditions (for V7 cell cultures 35 d growth in WB/A medium; for leaves—24 h in filtered water at 25 °C); SA 50 and SA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of SA; MeJA 50 and MeJA 200—supplemented with 50 and 200 µM of MeJA; CA 0.1 and 0.5—supplemented with 100 and 500 µM of CA; UV 1 h and 24 h—1 h or 24 h after UV-C irradiation. *, **—significantly different from the values of VaCIPK expression in V. amurensis cells under the control conditions (V7 or L) at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01 according to the Student’s t-test.
Plants 12 01562 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiselev, K.V.; Aleynova, O.A.; Ogneva, Z.V.; Suprun, A.R.; Ananev, A.A.; Nityagovsky, N.N.; Dneprovskaya, A.A.; Beresh, A.A.; Dubrovina, A.S. The Effect of Stress Hormones, Ultraviolet C, and Stilbene Precursors on Expression of Calcineurin B-like Protein (CBL) and CBL-Interacting Protein Kinase (CIPK) Genes in Cell Cultures and Leaves of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plants 2023, 12, 1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071562

AMA Style

Kiselev KV, Aleynova OA, Ogneva ZV, Suprun AR, Ananev AA, Nityagovsky NN, Dneprovskaya AA, Beresh AA, Dubrovina AS. The Effect of Stress Hormones, Ultraviolet C, and Stilbene Precursors on Expression of Calcineurin B-like Protein (CBL) and CBL-Interacting Protein Kinase (CIPK) Genes in Cell Cultures and Leaves of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Plants. 2023; 12(7):1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071562

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiselev, Konstantin V., Olga A. Aleynova, Zlata V. Ogneva, Andrey R. Suprun, Alexey A. Ananev, Nikolay N. Nityagovsky, Alina A. Dneprovskaya, Alina A. Beresh, and Alexandra S. Dubrovina. 2023. "The Effect of Stress Hormones, Ultraviolet C, and Stilbene Precursors on Expression of Calcineurin B-like Protein (CBL) and CBL-Interacting Protein Kinase (CIPK) Genes in Cell Cultures and Leaves of Vitis amurensis Rupr" Plants 12, no. 7: 1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071562

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop