Next Article in Journal
Identification and Expression Analysis of the Isopentenyl Transferase (IPT) Gene Family under Lack of Nitrogen Stress in Oilseed (Brassica napus L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Leaf Essential Oil from Endemic Gynoxys laurifolia (Kunth) Cass. of Southern Ecuador: Chemical and Enantioselective Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Green-Leaf Volatiles Released from Cabbage Palms (Sabal palmetto) Infected with the Lethal Bronzing Phytoplasma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health-Promoting Properties and Potential Application in the Food Industry of Citrus medica L. and Citrus × clementina Hort. Ex Tan. Essential Oils and Their Main Constituents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Constituents, Enantiomer Content, Antioxidant and Anticholinesterase Activities of Valeriana microphylla Kunth Essential Oil

Departamento de Química y Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(11), 2155; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112155
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 18 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023

Abstract

:
The study of the essential oil (EO) from aerial parts (stems and leaves) of Valeriana microphylla Kunth (Valerianaceae), collected from the Saraguro community in the southern region of Ecuador, was analyzed for the first time. A total of 62 compounds were identified in V. microphylla EO by GC-FID and GC-MS on nonpolar DB-5ms and polar HP-INNOWax columns. The most abundant components (>5%) detected on DB-5ms and polar HP-INNOWax columns were α-gurjunene (11.98, 12.74%), germacrene D (11.47, 14.93%), E-caryophyllene (7.05, 7.78%), and α-copaene (6.76, 6.91%), respectively. In addition, the enantioselective analysis, carried out on a chiral column, showed (+)-α-pinene and (R)-(+)-germacrene as enantiomerically pure compounds (enantiomeric excess = 100%). The antioxidant activity was high for the radicals ABTS (SC50 = 41.82 µg/mL) and DPPH (SC50 = 89.60 µg/mL), and finally, the EO was shown to be inactive to the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), as both values were >250 µg/mL.

1. Introduction

The Valerianaceae family is widely distributed and about 350 species are grown worldwide (except in countries of the oceanic continent, such as Australia and New Zealand), which are mainly distributed at high elevations and in alpine areas [1]. The Valeriana genus, belonging to the Valerianaceae family consisting of 250 species, is distributed in the Andes (South America), such as Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Chile, and Argentina [2]. In Ecuador, this botanical family is represented by 35 species, and Valeriana is a typical genus of high and cold areas; seven species are endemic, and most are shrubby and grow in the Andean forests up to the sub-páramos: Valeriana alypifolia H.B.K., V. buxifolia F.G. Meyer, V. hirtella H.B.K., V. imbricata Killip, V. microphylla H.B.K., V. protenta Eriksen, and V. punctata F.G. Meyer [3,4].
Valeriana microphylla Kunth is commonly known as “valeriana de cerro”, “candelilla”, or “escobilla” by the Saraguros community of Ecuador, as well as “sacha valeriana” and “warmi valeriana” in Kichwa-Spanish language, and as “hapapu”, “hata”, or “yana yanta” in Kichwa [5]. Morphologically, they are small plants measuring 60 cm in length with a fetid odor, and the leaves are oval or elliptical and up to 10 mm long, as seen in Figure 1. They have inflorescence at the tips of the upright branches, up to 5 cm long, with many flowers; these can be white or pink, sometimes with lilac tints, up to 3 mm long, and tubular in shape. The fruit are crowned lunular in shape and measure up to 1.5 mm [6].
In Ecuador, V. microphylla is widely distributed in the Andean region from 2500 to 4500 m a.s.l. in the provinces of Imbabura, Bolívar, Cañar, Carchi, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, Tungurahua, Morona Santiago, Napo, Pichincha, Sucumbíos, Azuay, Zamora Chinchipe, and Loja [7].
Traditional and ancestral uses for heart, nervous, and stomach conditions have been reported for V. microphylla. Other medicinal uses, such as antipyretic, antipruritic, diuretic, purgative, and antispasmodic, have also been registered [8]. The “Saraguros” indigenous community’s (southern Ecuador) knowledge of medicinal plants is broad, and they use this species to treat and cure diseases related to nerves [9]. The Valerian species and other genera belonging to the Valerianaceae family have used the roots and rhizomes in traditional medicine for centuries as a sedative, and many species have been studied so far [10]. The main product obtained from this species is the extract of roots, although some of its parts have various traditional uses; for example, the root bark is used as an infusion to cure fear, the root and the flower along with other herbs are used for the same purpose, and the leaves are used as an infusion to make baths against hechizos, malos espíritus, and enfriamientos [5].
Studies of the chemical composition of various Valerian taxa have reported the presence of flavonoids and alkaloids obtained mainly from the aerial parts, while sesquiterpenes and iridoids were found in the roots and rhizomes [11]. The most important iridoid compounds found in Valerianaceae were valepotriates, valtrate, isovaltrate, acevaltrate, and didrovaltrate, which were responsible for the sedative effect [10]. Other related studies of species belonging to the Valeriana genus showed a high level of antioxidant effects, such as in the essential oil (EO) of Valeriana jatamansi obtained from aerial parts and roots collected in the pre-flowering stage [12], while Valeriana officinalis has helped to block the production of reactive oxygen species in brain slices induced by quinolinic acid [13].
EOs are a miscellaneous family of low molecular weight organic compounds with circumstantial biological activity, being of interest for the control of human ailments, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Several in vitro analyses showed that some components in EOs may have cholinesterase (ChEs) inhibitory activity [14,15]. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), together with butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), belongs to the group of enzymes called cholinesterases, which catalyze the hydrolysis/degradation of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (Ach), resulting in an increase in the level of ACh in the neuronal synaptic area. In a healthy normal brain, AChE predominates over BuChE activity [16,17]. Reports of in vitro ChEs enzymes inhibition activity of species of the Valerian genus showed that the sesquiterpene volvalerenal acid K, when isolated from V. officinalis var. latiofolia, increased learning and memory abilities in mice as their brain tissues were improved [18]. The evaluation of the anticholinesterase activity of V. microphylla will be reported for the first time in the present investigation.
Traditionally, the rural communities of southern Ecuador use the roots of the plant as a therapeutic resource, which can be macerated in aguardiente (alcohol), and the exudate of its roots can be obtained for long periods of time in dark or buried places, while the aerial part is discarded and used solely as fertilizer. Therefore, since there is little information in the scientific literature on the chemical composition of the aerial parts of valerian species that allow for the evaluation of its possible use [19], the purpose of this research is to provide information on the chemical composition and antioxidant and cholinesterase activity of the essential oil of the aerial parts (leaves and stems) of V. microphylla from Ecuador.

2. Results

2.1. Physical Properties

Steam distillation from V. microphylla leaves and stems provided an EO with an intense yellow color and characteristic aroma of the species, with an average yield of 0.0122 ± 0.0031% (w/w).

2.2. GC-EIMS and GC-FID Analyses

A total of 62 constituents were identified and quantified in the essential oil of V. microphylla by GC/FID and GC/MS on nonpolar DB-5ms and polar HP-INNOWax columns. The major constituents (>4%) detected by the two columns were α-gurjunene (11.98, 12.74%) (a), germacrene D (11.47, 14.93%) (b), E-caryophyllene (7.05, 7.78%) (c), α-copaene (6.76, 6.91%) (d), E,E-α-farnesene (4.78, 4.13%) (e), and allo-aromadendrene (4.25, 2.55%) (f), respectively (Figure 2). All the identified constituents represented 98.08% and 98.29% of the total EO. This was calculated as the sum of the integrated peaks of the identified compounds, with respect to the total area of the peaks in the gas chromatograms. The compounds identified in the V. microphylla EO, with the corresponding percentages, are listed in Table 1. On the other hand, the GC-MS chromatogram is shown in Figure 3.
The main constituents were sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (75.15%, 79.31%), followed by aliphatic hydrocarbons (6.27%, 8.89%), oxygenated sesquiterpenes (5.07%, 3.49%), and other compounds (5.20%, 1.85%).

2.3. Enantioselective Analysis

Enantioselective analysis was performed by GC/MS of the essential oil and reported for first time, and the (+)-α-pinene and (+)-germacrene D were recognized as enantiomerically pure (enantiomeric excess = 100%). The enantiomeric distribution (%) for each compound are present in Table 2.

2.4. Cholinesterase Inhibition Test

The cholinesterase activity of V. microphylla EO was evaluated for the first time. It was shown to be inactive against the AChE and BuChE enzymes, both having values > 250 µg/mL, respectively. Donepezil hydrochloride was used as a positive control. The half maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) values are presented in Table 3.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant capacity of the EO of V. microphylla was expressed as the concentration needed for the radical scavenging capacity at 50% (SC50). According to the results depicted in Table 4, V. microphylla EO exerted a strong to moderate scavenging effect over ABTS cation radical and DPPH radical, with SC50 values less than 100 µg/mL.

3. Discussion

The average yield of aerial parts of V. microphylla EO obtained in relation to the plant material used was a low value of 0.0122 ± 0.0031% (w/w) [37]. There are factors that influence the variation in the yield of EOs, such as plant species, origin, part of the plant used (leaves, stems, flowers, roots, etc.), climatic and cultivation conditions (use of fertilizers, cultivation soil, temperature) [38], the extraction method (steam distillation and hydrodistillation), which has some weaknesses that greatly affect the yield and quality, and the way to store the EO [39,40].
The chemical composition of EO obtained from the aerial parts of V. microphylla species was reported for the first time, and a total of 62 compounds were identified. The major compounds were α-gurjunene (11.98, 12.74%), germacrene D (11.47, 14.93%), E-caryophyllene (7.05, 7.78%), α-copaene (6.76, 6.91%), E,E-α-farnesene (4.78, 4.13%), and allo-aromadendrene (4.25, 2.55%). The chemical profile of EO was compared with studies on EO samples obtained from the root of species from India, such as V. jatamansi and V. hardwickii, among which sesquiterpene (36.1%) was reported; α-gurjunene (8.7, 4.1%) and allo-aromadendrene (1.6, 0.3%), respectively, were reported [41]. In contrast, among the majority compounds of V. officinalis root, the EO included (E)-caryophyllene (3.4%), allo-aromadendrene (4.1%), and α-gurjunene (1.2%), and germacrene D (0.7%) is found in a minority within the composition [42]. The EO obtained by the hydrodistillation of underground parts of V. alliariifolia reported α-gurjune (0.2%) and α-copaene (0.4%) among its minority compounds [43].
For the first time, the EO of V. microphylla was subjected to enantioselective analysis. The enantiomeric composition of an EO is an important property of the oil and an essential marker for determining the authenticity of a plant species [44]. In our study, we identified the enantiomers of germacrene D, which is considered a precursor of many sesquiterpenes, and its enantiomers are synthesized by plants, fungi, and animals [45]. The (+)-germacrene D has been found in some species, catalyzed by two enantioselective synthases [46], and another enantiomer was (+)-α -pinene, which research showed has potential as an inhibitor of phospholipase and esterase activities [47].
The aerial parts of V. microphylla EO showed moderate antioxidant activity with SC50 41.82 ± 1.62 µg/mL for ABTS and SC50 89.60 ± 1.31 for DPPH. Thusso et al. found that the methanolic and aqueous extract of V. jatamansi showed antioxidant activity with SC50 78 ± 2.9 µg/mL and SC50 154 ± 4.6 µg/mL, respectively, while the essential oil of its roots showed poor radical scavenging activity (SC50 876 ± 12.8 µg/mL) by DPPH assay [48]. The moderate antioxidant activity of the essential oil could be attributed to the presence of sesquiterpenes [49]. The study on V. jatamansi species showed a high antioxidant activity in EO samples of roots (6.30 ± 0.047 µg/mL DPPH) and methanolic extracts of aerial parts (6. 82 ± 0.10 µg/mL ABTS) collected at the pre-flowering stage, while it was low at flowering (aerial parts) (2.91 ± 0.01 µg/mL ABTS) (2.07 ± 0.08 µg/mL DPPH) and post-anthesis (root) (2.94 ± 0.18 µg/mL ABTS) (3.44 ± 0.17 µg/mL DPPH) [12]. Wang et al. found a DPPH value of 493.40 µg/mL in the essential oil obtained from the roots and rhizomes of V. officinalis [50].
Exposure to radiation triggers the accumulation of antioxidants in the aerial parts, while under normal conditions, it stimulates their storage in the rhizome [51]. In addition, Rather et al. in their study carried out the determination of the antioxidant activity of E-caryophyllene, germacrene-D, and β-pinene, which presented a synergistic effect, obtaining a moderate dose-dependent antioxidant result against DPPH with values of 78.1 µg/mL, 73.2 µg/mL, and 80.0 µg/mL, respectively [52]. Consequently, we could attribute the antioxidant effect of V. microphylla EO to the presence of these major compounds.
An in vitro study showed that some components present in EOs may inhibit ChEs, whose function is to hydrolyze acetylcholine in the cholinergic terminals, and therefore, in some dementias where this neurotransmitter is diminished, such as Alzheimer’s disease, it could be an alternative pathway for the control of this disease [53]. The essential oil of V. microphylla reported values >250 µg/mL for AChE and BuChE, respectively. Studies on chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of V. wallichii significantly inhibit AChE (IC50 0.061 mg/mL) and BChE (IC50 0.058 mg/mL), while extracts of V. polystachya also show a slight inhibition of AChE at 200 µg/mL [54]. Reports of ChEs activities in traditional medicinal species from Vietnam [55] have shown that Eos with high concentrations of sesquiterpenes exhibit moderate AchE inhibitory activity. The inhibitory activity of Aes from other species of the genus Valeriana against ChEs has been poorly documented.
Based on these findings, we can conclude that most species belonging to the Valerianaceae family are used for their numerous medicinal properties; in particular, their roots and rhizomes are used to prepare infusions. The present study emphasizes the aerial part of the Valerian species since this part is disregarded; for that reason, our purpose is to highlight its importance by determining its chemical composition and its activity as a natural antioxidant, this being an area of growing interest, especially in complementary medicine and food science.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

The aerial parts (leaves and stems) of the species V. microphylla were collected in October 2020 in the Saraguro province of Loja, at coordinates 9,593,252 N, 696,030 E, at an altitude of 3210 m.s.n.m. The collection was permitted by the Ministry of Environment Ecuador (MAE) with authorization MAE-DBN-2016-048.The plant was identified by José M. Andrade, curator of the Herbarium (HUTPL) at the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja. A voucher sample of V. microphylla (PPN-va-001) was deposited in HUTPL.

4.2. Extraction of the Volatile Oil

The EO of V. microphylla was obtained by the steam distillation of fresh aerial parts (stem and leaves) for 3 h at atmospheric pressure using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The distilled EO was separated from the aqueous phase and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and then stored in a brown vial at 4 °C until chemical and biological analysis. The procedure was performed in triplicate [56].

4.3. Chemical Characterization of Essential Oil

4.3.1. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analyses were performed in an Agilent Technologies model 6890 N gas chromatograph (GC) coupled to a mass spectrometer detector (model Agilent 5973 inert) (Santa Clara, CA, USA). A solution (1 μL) of each EO in dichloromethane (1:100 v/v) was injected in duplicate in split mode (40:1) at 20 °C. The GC equipment operated in electron ionization mode at 70 eV with helium as the carrier gas (1.00 mL/min in constant flow), and the GC oven operated with a temperature ramp from 60 °C to 250 °C, with a gradient of 3 °C/min and the ion source at 250 °C. In addition, capillary columns DB-5ms fused silica column (5% phenyl 95% polydimethylsiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm) and HP-INNOWax (polyethylene glycol, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm) were both purchased from J & W Scientific (Folsom, CA, USA). The procedure was carried out in triplicate.
In order to identify the compounds, present in EO, the mass spectra and the linear retention index (LRI) were compared with those reported in the literature. The LRI was determined experimentally according to Van Den Dool and Krats [57]. A homologous series of C9 to C24 alkanes were injected under the same conditions.
Gas chromatography/Flame ionization detector (GC/FID) was used for the quantitative analysis of the EO of V. microphylla. The prepared samples were injected under the same conditions as the GC/MS method, using the same columns and analytical conditions. To determine the percentage of aromatic compounds, the GC peaks were compared with the total area of the identified peaks [58]. According to the methodology proposed by Gilardoni et al. [59], a calibration curve was established for each column using isopropyl caproate (0.6, 1.8, 4.3, 8.3, 16.8, and 34.3 mg isopropyl caproate in 10 mL cyclohexane) and n-nonane (7 mg) as the calibration and internal standards, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) (0.4 μg/mL) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) (1.2 μg/mL) were determined. The correlation between both calibration curves was 0.995.

4.3.2. Enantioselective Analysis of Essential Oil

Enantioselective analysis was carried out for the first time in the aerial parts of V. microphylla EO. Capillary chiral was a Megadex (2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-cyclodextrin) 25 m × 0.25 mm I.D. × 0.25 µm df (Mega, Legnano, Italy). Temperature program: 50–200 °C at 2 °C/min, split mode 1:20; gas carrier Helium, injected volume 1.0 µL, to determine the order of elution of the enantiomers in EO, enantiomerically pure standards were injected under the same conditions [60].

4.4. AChE and BuChE Inhibition Spectrophotometric Analysis

The anti-AChE and anti-BuChE activities in vitro of the EO were evaluated according to Calva et al. [56] and Ellman et al. [61].
A typical 200 μL inhibition assay volume contained phosphate buffered saline solution (pH 7.4), DTNB (1.5 mM), and a tested sample in DMSO (1% v/v final). Both AChE (Type V–S, lyophilized powder, 744 U/mg solid, 1272 U/mg protein) and BuChE (lyophilized powder, 900 U/mg protein) were dissolved in PBS (pH 7.4) and used at 25 mU/mL for the assay. After 10 min of pre-incubation, the enzyme substrate acetylthiocholine iodide (1.5 mM) was added to start the reaction. During 30 min of incubation at 30 °C, 96-well microtiter multiplate were read on a PherastarFS (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) detection system. Enzymatic activities were tested in the presence of 0.05–250 μg/mL of each EO dissolved in DMSO, whose concentration was kept constant and expressed versus DMSO alone. Donepezil was used a reference ChE inhibitor for both enzymes [17]. IC50 values were determined from three individual experiments. The activity results were expressed as the mean ± SD of the three replicates. IC50 values were determined from a nonlinear regression model by using the GNUPLOT online package (www.ic50.tk (accessed on 1 March 2023), www.gnuplot.info (accessed on 5 March 2023)). One-way ANOVA simple or multiple comparison as well as [58] were used.

4.5. Antioxidant Spectrophotometric Analysis

4.5.1. DPPH Assay

The DPPH radical scavenging assay was performed with slight modifications using the free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydryl (DPPH-) according to the method proposed by Thaipong et al. [62]. A working solution was prepared by dissolving 24 mg of DPPH in 100 mL of methanol, which was then stabilized in an EPOCH 2 microplate reader (BIOTEK, Winooski, VT, USA) at 515 nm until reaching an absorbance of 1.1 ± 0.01. Different concentrations of EO (1, 0.5, and 0.25 mg/mL) were used for the anti-radical reaction between EO and the free radical. Subsequently, 30 μL of EO sample and 270 μL of DPPH-adjusted working solution were added to a 96-well plate. The reaction was monitored at 515 nm for 60 min at room temperature. The blank and positive controls were methanol and Trolox, respectively. The results were expressed as SC50 (radical scavenging concentration at 50%) and calculated according to the corresponding curve fit of the data with GraphPadPrism v.8.0.1. Three replicates were used to measure.

4.5.2. ABTS Assay

According to Arnao et al. [63] and Thaipong et al. [62], antioxidant capacity was measured against the ABTS-+ cation (2,20-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) with minor modifications. The assay started with the preparation of a stock solution of the radical by reacting equal volumes of ABTS (7.4 μM) and potassium persulfate (2.6 μM) for 12 h with stirring. Standards were prepared by dissolving in methanol to an absorbance of 1.1 ± 0.02 at 734 nm in an EPOCH 2 microplate reader (BIOTEK, Winooski, VT, USA). The antiradical reaction was evaluated for 1 h in the dark at room temperature, and 270 μL of the adjusted working solution of ABTS and 30 μL of V. microphylla EO at different concentrations (1, 0.5 and 0.25 mg/mL) were inoculated. The positive and blank controls were Trolox and methanol, respectively. The results were expressed as the SC50 (50% concentration to kill the root) and were calculated according to the appropriate curve fit of the data using GraphPadPrism v. 8.0.1. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

5. Conclusions

The aerial parts (stems and leaves) of V. microphylla species gave a low yield of essential oil (0.0122% w/w). The resulting EO was mainly composed of sesquiterpene and monoterpene, the major components of which were α-gurjunene and germacrene D (about 12% each). Enantioselective analysis revealed (+)-α-pinene and (R)-(+)-germacrene as enantiomerically pure compounds. EO exhibited low inhibitory activity against AChE and BuChE enzymes, and a high antioxidant potential was observed for EO, as measured by DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays. Furthermore, this genus is of interest for use as a natural antioxidant due to the high activity shown in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.; methodology, J.C. and L.C.; investigation, L.C., J.C. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A.; writing—review and editing, G.A., L.C., J.C. and C.A.; supervision, C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All the authors are grateful to the Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) for its politics of open access publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bell, C.D.; Donoghue, M.J. Phylogeny and biogeography of Valerianaceae (Dipsacales) with special reference to the South American valerians. Org. Div. Evol. 2005, 5, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kutschker, A. Revisión del género Valeriana (Valerianaceae) en Sudamérica austral. Revision of genus Valeriana (Valerianaceae) in Southern South America. Gayana Bot. 2011, 68, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. León-Yánez, S.; Valencia, R.; Pitmam, N.; Endara, L.; Ulloa Ulloa, C.; Navarrete, H. Libro Rojo de Plantas Endémicas del Ecuador, 2nd ed.; Publicaciones del Herbario QCA; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2011; pp. 806–807. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jorgensen, P.; León-Yánez, S. Catalogue of Vascular Plants of Ecuador; Missouri Botanical Garden: San Louis, MI, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  5. De la Torre, L.H.; Navarrete, P.; Muriel, M.; Macía, M.J.; Balslev, H. Enciclopedia de las Plantas Útiles del Ecuador, 1st ed.; Herbario QCA de la Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2008; pp. 613–614. [Google Scholar]
  6. Minga Ochoa, D.A.; Ansaloni, R.; Verdugo, A.; Ulloa Ulloa, C. Flora del Páramo del Cajas, Ecuador; Universidad del Azuay: Imprenta Don Bosco, Cuenca, Ecuador, 2016; p. 56. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chimbolema, S.; Suárez, D.; Peñafiel, M.; Acurio, C. Guía de Plantas de la Reserva Ecológica El Ángel, 1st ed.; Smaak Graphic Studio: Quito, Ecuador, 2010; pp. 125–126. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aguilar, Z.; Hidalgo, P.; Ulloa, C. Plantas Útiles de los Páramos de Zuleta, Ecuador; Proyecto de Manejo y Aprovechamiento Sustentable de Alpacas en los Páramos de Zuleta; PPA-EcoCiencia: Quito, Ecuador, 2009; pp. 93–94. [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrade, J.M.; Lucero-Mosquera, H.; Armijos, C. Ethnobotany of indigenous Saraguros: Medicinal plants used by community healers “Hampiyachakkuna” in the San Lucas Parish, Southern Ecuador. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 2314–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bayer, R.; Blaskó, I.; Cola, G.; Shamma, D.; Schmidhammer, M.; Klotzer, H.; Battersby, W.; Hirst, A.B.; Mccaldin, M.; Southgate, D.; et al. Valtrates and Lignans in Valeriana microphylla. Arch. Pharm. Weinheim 1993, 59, 478–479. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Y.; Jin, L.; Yu, S.; Shi, Q.; Gu, Y.; Kiyota, H. Chemical Constituents of Plants from the Genus Valeriana. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2010, 7, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jugran, A.K.; Rawat, S.; Bhatt, I.D.; Rawal, R.S. Essential oil composition, phenolics and antioxidant activities of Valeriana jatamansi at different phenological stages. Plant Biosyst. 2021, 155, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sudati, J.H.; Fachinetto, R.; Pereira, R.P.; Boligon, A.A.; Athayde, M.L.; Soares, F.A.; de Vargas Barbosa, N.B.; Rocha, J.B.T. In vitro antioxidant activity of Valeriana officinalis against different neurotoxic agents. Neurochem. Res. 2009, 34, 1372–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karakaya, S.; Koca, M.; Kılıc, C.S.; Coskun, M. Antioxidant and anticholinesterase activities of Ferulago syriaca Boiss. and F. isaurica Peșmen growing in Turkey. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 1843–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bonesi, M.; Menichini, F.; Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M.R.; Conforti, F.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Statti, G.A.; Menichini, F. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Pinus species essential oils and their constituents. J. Enz. Inh. Med. Chem. 2010, 25, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sánchez-Chávez, G.; Salceda, R. Enzimas polifuncionales: El caso de la acetilcolinesterasa. Rev. Educ. Bioquímica 2008, 27, 44–51. [Google Scholar]
  17. McGleenon, B.M.; Dynan, K.B.; Passmore, A.P. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. British J. Clin. Pharm. 1999, 48, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, H.W.; He, X.H.; Yuan, R.; Wei, B.J.; Chen, Z.; Dong, J.X.; Wang, J. Sesquiterpenes and a monoterpenoid with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity from Valeriana officinalis var. latiofolia in vitro and in vivo. Fitoterapia 2016, 110, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarikurkcu, C.; Jeszka, S.M.; Sabih, O.M. Valeriana dioscoridis aerial parts’ extracts—A new source of phytochemicals with antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 148, 112273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caldeira, M.; Gentil, D.G. Utilização do índice de retenção linear para caracterização de compostos voláteis em café solúvel utilizando GC-MS e coluna HP-Innowax. Química Nova 2007, 30, 2031–2034. [Google Scholar]
  21. Armijos, C.; Matailo, A.; Bec, N.; Salinas, M.; Aguilar, G.; Solano, N.; Calva, J.; Ludeña, C.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G. Chemical composition and selective BuChE inhibitory activity of the essential oils from aromatic plants used to prepare the traditional Ecuadorian beverage horchata lojana. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 263, 113162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Paolini, J.; Muselli, A.; Bernardini, A.F.; Bighelli, A.; Casanova, J.; Costa, J. Thymol derivatives from essential oil of Doronicum corsicum L. Flav. Frag. J. 2007, 22, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Özek, G.; Özek, T.; İşcan, G.; Başer, K.H.C.; Hamzaoglu, E.R.G.I.N.; Duran, A. Comparison of hydrodistillation and microdistillation methods for the analysis of fruit volatiles of Prangos pabularia Lindl., and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity. South Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shimizu, Y.; Imayoshi, Y.; Kato, M.; Maeda, K.; Iwabuchi, H.; Shimomura, K. Volatiles from leaves of field-grown plants and shoot cultures of Gynura bicolor DC. Flav. Frag. J. 2009, 24, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Calvopiña, K.; Malagón, O.; Capetti, F.; Sgorbini, B.; Verdugo, V.; Gilardoni, G. A New Sesquiterpene Essential Oil from the Native Andean Species Jungia rugosa Less (Asteraceae): Chemical Analysis, Enantiomeric Evaluation, and Cholinergic Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Demirci, F.; Guven, K.; Demirci, B.; Dadandi, M.Y.; Baser, K.H.C. Antibacterial activity of two Phlomis essential oils against food pathogens. Food Control 2008, 19, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salinas, M.; Bec, N.; Calva, J.; Ramírez, J.; Andrade, J.M.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Chemical composition and anticholinesterase activity of the essential oil from the Ecuadorian plant Salvia pichinchensis Benth. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2020, 14, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Başer, K.H.C.; Demirci, B.; Kirimer, N.E.; Satil, F.; Tümen, G. The essential oils of Thymus migricus and T. fedtschenkoi var. handelii from Turkey. Flavour Frag. J. 2002, 17, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Formisano, C.; Senatore, F.; Bancheva, S.; Bruno, M.; Maggio, A.; Rosselli, S. Volatile components of Centaurea bracteata and C. pannonica subsp. pannonica growing wild in Croatia. Nat. Prod. Comm. 2010, 5, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wijaya, C.H.; Ulrich, D.; Lestari, R.; Schippel, K.; Ebert, G. Identification of potent odorants in different cultivars of snake fruit [Salacca zalacca (Gaert.) Voss] using gas chromatography−olfactometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1637–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ennigrou, A.; Casabianca, H.; Laarif, A.; Hanchi, B.; Hosni, K. Maturation-related changes in phytochemicals and biological activities of the Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) fruits. South Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saïdana, D.; Mahjoub, S.; Boussaada, O.; Chriaa, J.; Mahjoub, M.A.; Chéraif, I.; DaamiRemadi, M.; Gannoun, S.; Helal, A.N. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oils of two saltcedar species from Tunisia. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Noorizadeh, H.; Farmany, A. Exploration of linear and nonlinear modeling techniques to predict of retention index of essential oils. J. Chin. Chem. S 2010, 57, 1268–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas, Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; AllurePublishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; ISBN 10-1932633219. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilardoni, G.; Montalván, M.; Ortiz, M.; Vinueza, D.; Montesinos, J.V. The flower essential oil of Dalea mutisii Kunth (Fabaceae) from Ecuador: Chemical, enantioselective, and olfactometric analyses. Plants 2020, 9, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Espinosa, S.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Ramírez, J.; Sgorbini, B.; Bicchi, C.; Gilardoni, G. A novel chemical profile of a selective in vitro cholinergic essential oil from Clinopodium taxifolium (Kunth) Govaerts (Lamiaceae), a native Andean species of Ecuador. Molecules 2021, 26, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Valarezo, E.; Ojeda-Riascos, S.; Cartuche, L.; Andrade-González, N.; González-Sánchez, I.; Meneses, M.A. Extraction and study of the essential oil of copal (Dacryodes peruviana), an amazonian fruit with the highest yield worldwide. Plants 2020, 9, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ochoa, K.; Paredes, L.; Bejarano, D.; Silva, R. Extraction, characterization and evaluation of antibacterial activity of essential oil of Senecio graveolens Wedd (Wiskataya). Sci. Agropecu. 2012, 3, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmad, M.S.; Nasshorudin, D.; Mamat, A.S. Novel Closed System Extraction of Essential Oil: Impact on Yield and Physical Characterization. Int. Conf. Biotech Env. Manag. 2014, 75, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  40. Barra, A. Factors Affecting Chemical Variability of Essential Oils: A Review of Recent Developments. Nat. Prod. Com. 2009, 4, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Das, J.; Mao, A.A.; Handique, P.J. Terpenoid Compositions and Antioxidant Activities of Two Indian Valerian Oils from the Khasi Hills of North-east India. Nat. Prod. Com. 2011, 6, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Safaralie, A.; Fatemi, S.; Sefidkon, F. Essential oil composition of Valeriana officinalis L. roots cultivated in Iran. Comparative analysis between supercritical CO2 extraction and hydrodistillation. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1180, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bardakcı, H.; Demirci, B.; Yesilada, E.; Kırmızıbekmez, H. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil of the Subterranean Parts of Valeriana alliariifolia. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2014, 6, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  44. Matailo, A.; Bec, N.; Calva, J.; Ramírez, J.; Andrade, J.M.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Selective BuChE inhibitory activity, chemical composition, and enantiomer content of the volatile oil from the Ecuadorian plant Clinopodium brownei. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2019, 29, 749–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoshihara, K.; Ohta, Y.; Sakai, T.; Hirose, Y. Germacrene D, a key intermediate of cadinene group compounds and bourbonenes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 27, 2263–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stranden, M.; Borg-Karlson, A.-K.; Mustaparta, H. Receptor Neuron Discrimination of the Germacrene D Enantiomers in the Moth Helicoverpa armigera. Chem. Senses 2002, 27, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Silva, R.A.; Lopes, M.P.; Azevedo, B.M.; Costa, M.D.; Alviano, S.C.; Alviano, S.D. Biological Activities of a-Pinene and β-Pinene Enantiomers. Molecules 2012, 17, 6305–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thusoo, S.; Gupta, S.; Sudan, R.; Kour, J.; Bhagat, S.; Hussain, R.; Bhagat, M. Antioxidant activity of essential oil and extracts of Valeriana jatamansi Roots. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 614187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zengin, H.; Baysal, A.H. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of essential oil terpenes against pathogenic and spoilage-forming bacteria and cell structure-activity relationships evaluated by SEM microscopy. Molecules 2014, 19, 17773–17798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Han, J.; Yu, Z.; Yang, F. Chemical analysis and biological activity of the essential oils of two valerianaceous species from China: Nardostachys chinensis and Valeriana officinalis. Molecules 2010, 15, 6411–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rawat, S.; Bhatt, I.D.; Rawal, R.S.; Nandi, S.K. Effect of developmental stages on total phenolic composition and anti-oxidant activities in Hedychium spicatum Buch. Ham. ex D.Don (Vanhaldi). J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 2014, 89, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rather, M.A.; Dar, B.A.; Dar, M.Y.; Wani, B.A.; Shah, W.A.; Bhat, B.A.; Ganai, B.A.; Bhat, K.A.; Anand, R.; Qurishi, M.A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the leaf essential oil of Juglans regia L. and its constituents. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pérez, M.L.; Cabeza, M.; Nuñez, N. In vitro effect of rosemary oil (Rosmarinus officinalis) as inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase activity as an alternative therapy in Alzheimer’s Syndrome. Health Probl. 2020, 26, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  54. Marcucci, C.; Rademacher, M.; Kamecki, F.; Pastore, V.; Bach, H.G.; Ricco, R.A.; Wagner, M.L.; Knez, D.; Gobec, S.; Colettis, N.; et al. Biological Evaluation of Valeriana Extracts from Argentina with Potent Cholinesterase Inhibition for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders and Their Comorbidities—The Case of Valeriana carnosa Sm. (Caprifoliaceae) Studied in Mice. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hung, N.H.; Quan, P.M.; Satyal, P.; Dai, D.N.; Hoa, V.; van Huy, N.G.; Giang, L.D.; Ha, N.T.; Huong, L.T.; Hien, V.T.; et al. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activities of Essential Oils from Vietnamese Traditional Medicinal Plants. Molecules 2022, 27, 7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Calva, J.; Bec, N.; Gilardoni, G.; Larroque, C.; Cartuche, L.; Bicchi, C.; Montesinos, J.V. Acorenone B: AChE and BChE Inhibitor as a Major Compound of the Essential Oil Distilled from the Ecuadorian Species Niphogeton dissecta (Benth.) J.F. Macbr. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas—Liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Villalta, G.; Salinas, M.; Calva, J.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Selective BuChE Inhibitory Activity, Chemical Composition, and Enantiomeric Content of the Essential Oil from Salvia leucantha Cav. Collected in Ecuador. Plants 2021, 10, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gilardoni, G.; Matute, Y.; Ramírez, J. Chemical and Enantioselective Analysis of the Leaf Essential Oil from Piper coruscans Kunth (Piperaceae), a Costal and Amazonian Native Species of Ecuador. Plants 2020, 9, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Calva, J.; Cartuche, L.; González, S.; Montesinos, J.V.; Morocho, V. Chemical composition, enantiomeric analysis and anticholinesterase activity of Lepechinia betonicifolia essential oil from Ecuador. Pharm. Biol. 2022, 60, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arnao, M.B.; Cano, A.; Acosta, M. The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2001, 73, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Image of V. microphylla Kunth collected in Ecuador.
Figure 1. Image of V. microphylla Kunth collected in Ecuador.
Plants 12 02155 g001
Figure 2. Principal compounds V. microphylla EO; (a) α-gurjunene; (b) germacrene D; (c) E-caryophyllene; (d) α-copaene; (e) E,E-α-farnesene; (f) allo-aromadendrene.
Figure 2. Principal compounds V. microphylla EO; (a) α-gurjunene; (b) germacrene D; (c) E-caryophyllene; (d) α-copaene; (e) E,E-α-farnesene; (f) allo-aromadendrene.
Plants 12 02155 g002
Figure 3. GC/EMS chromatogram of V. microphylla on a nonpolar DB5-ms column (a) α-gurjunene; (b) germacrene D; (c) E-caryophyllene; (d) α-copaene; (e) E,E-α-farnesene; (f) allo-aromadendrene.
Figure 3. GC/EMS chromatogram of V. microphylla on a nonpolar DB5-ms column (a) α-gurjunene; (b) germacrene D; (c) E-caryophyllene; (d) α-copaene; (e) E,E-α-farnesene; (f) allo-aromadendrene.
Plants 12 02155 g003
Table 1. GC-EIMS and GC-FID analyses of V. microphylla Kunth.
Table 1. GC-EIMS and GC-FID analyses of V. microphylla Kunth.
DB-5msHP-INNOwax
CompoundsLRI aLRI b% ± SDLRI aLRI cRef.% ± SD
1Isovaleric acid8318270.64 ± 0.6516761680[20]2.58 ± 0.07
2α-Pinene9389320.27 ± 0.25
31,8-Cineole103110261.62 ± 0.1512051206[21]1.43 ± 0.81
4n-Nonanal110511000.59 ± 0.0513911395[22]0.39 ± 0.01
5(2E)-Decenal126212600.93 ± 0.42
6(E)-Anethole128512821.16 ± 0.0418271845[23]0.28 ± 0.01
7α-Cubebene134613480.48 ± 0.1414511460[22]0.32 ± 0.07
8trans-Piperitol acetate134613430.33 ± 0.13
9Cyclosativene136713692.29 ± 0.2014701490[24]2.03 ± 0.53
10α-Copaene137513746.76 ± 1.8014621464[25]6.91 ± 1.59
11β-Cubebene138613870.95 ± 0.7315311549[26]1.19 ± 0.97
12β-Elemene138813892.83 ± 1.46
13Sesquithujene140214052.19 ± 0.66
14α-Gurjunene1406140911.98 ± 3.6815131520[27]12.74 ± 5.90
15α-cis-Bergamotene141214113.90 ± 1.1615581557[22]3.26 ± 2.14
16(E)-Caryophyllene141814177.05 ± 0.4315861593[22]7.78 ± 0.97
17β-Copaene142514300.43 ± 0.1915801585[22]2.47 ± 0.80
18α-trans-Bergamotene143214320.69 ± 0.3115631580[22]1.92 ± 0.51
19Seychellene144614443.03 ± 0.611622 [25]3.69 ± 2.65
20Sesquisabinene A 16411629[22]1.74 ± 0.04
21α-Humulene145314442.46 ± 0.4716571661[22]1.78 ± 0.28
22allo-Aromadendrene145814584.25 ± 1.5916321631[22]2.55 ± 0.31
23(Z)-Cadina-1(6),4-diene146814611.39 ± 0.44
24(Z)-β-Farnesene 16471665[22]0.81 ± 0.20
25(E)-β-Farnesene 16681665[22]0.54 ± 0.10
26Ledene 16761686[22]0.76 ± 0.01
27Germacrene D1480148011.47 ± 1.5916981700[22]14.93 ± 3.68
28γ-Muurolene 16801681[22]0.90 ± 0.27
29δ-Selinene148814922.43 ± 0.1916811707[28]1.78 ± 0.02
30Bicyclogermacrene149415002.41 ± 1.1517221724[22]1.40 ± 0.03
31Isodaucene149715000.67 ± 0.24
32Pentadecane150015000.83 ± 0.8315011500[29]0.57 ± 0.04
33(E,E)-α-Farnesene150415144.78 ± 1.3117481746[22]4.13 ± 0.51
34δ-Amorphene150815110.26 ± 0.0617161704[25]1.05 ± 0.01
35γ-Cadinene151715132.4 ± 0.4017501748[22]3.60 ± 1.29
36ar-Curcumene 17711771[27]0.71 ± 0.05
37Valeric acid 17981780[30]0.45 ± 0.41
38(E)-Nerolidol156115610.56 ± 0.2520462047[21]0.39 ± 0.20
39(Z)-calamenene 18141808[22]0.34 ± 0.01
40Palustrol156515670.46 ± 0.2619051915[27]0.31 ± 0.02
41Spathulenol157415770.47 ± 03121182103[22]0.32 ± 0.11
42Caryophyllene oxide157715820.43 ± 0.1119541940[22]0.30± 0.01
43Globulol158215900.91 ± 0.1720612051[22]0.78 ± 0
44Viridiflorol159015920.85 ± 0.41
45Ledol160016020.50 ± 0.0220082017[27]0.88 ± 0.02
46Hexadecanal 21322119[22]0.86 ± 0.02
47α-Cadinol165316520.45 ± 0.2022222218[22]0.09± 0.01
48Valerianol166316560.45 ± 0.1422432230[31]0.43 ± 0.05
49n-Tetradecanol167716710.70 ± 0.33
50n-Heptadecane170117000.64 ± 0.0817001700[32]2.09± 0.03
51Octadecane180018000.14 ± 0.0818001800[26]0.33 ± 0.03
52(2E,6E)-Farnesyl acetate184518450.65 ± 0.21
532-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl-185018470.42 ± 0.26
54n-Nonadecane190119000.25 ± 0.02
55(E,Z)-Geranyl linalool198419870.65 ± 0.19
561-Eicosene199619871.11 ± 0.86
57Octadecanal 23452345[33]0.60 ± 0
58(E,E)-Geranyl linalool202520261.62 ± 0.04
59n-Octadecanol208720772.01 ± 0.16
60n-Heneicosane210121000.34 ± 0.11
61n-Tricosane230223002.95 ± 1.1723022300[22]3.99± 1.32
62n-Pentacosane 25002500[22]1.91 ± 0.79
Oxygenated monoterpenes2.77 1.71
Monoterpene hydrocarbons0.27 0
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes5.07 3.49
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons75.15 79.31
Aliphatic hydrocarbons6.27 8.89
Fatty acids0.64 3.03
Alcohol2.71 0
Others5.20 1.85
Total identified oil constituents (%)98.08 98.29
a Calculated linear retention index on a DB-5MS capillary column; b Linear retention indices on a DB-5MS column from reference [34]; c Linear retention indices on a HP-INNOWax capillary column; dLinear retention indices on a HP-INNOWax column from references (Ref.); Relative abundance in percentage (%), expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Table 2. Enantioselective analysis of V. microphylla essential oil.
Table 2. Enantioselective analysis of V. microphylla essential oil.
EnantiomerLRI aLRI bRef.Enantiomeric Distribution (%)ee (%)
(+)-α-Pinene 931932[35]100100
(R)-(+)-Germacrene 14361474[36]100
a Calculated linear retention index; b Linear retention index from reference; ee (%), percentage of excess enantiomeric.
Table 3. Cholinesterase inhibitory activity of V. microphylla essential oil.
Table 3. Cholinesterase inhibitory activity of V. microphylla essential oil.
SampleAChE, IC50 ± SD (µg/mL)BuChE, IC50 ± SD (µg/mL)
V. microphylla>250>250
Donepezil0.04 ± 0.013.60 ± 0.20
IC50; half maximal inhibitory concentration.
Table 4. Antioxidant activity of V. microphylla essential oil.
Table 4. Antioxidant activity of V. microphylla essential oil.
SampleABTSDPPH
SC50 (µg/mL)
V. microphylla41.82 ± 1.6289.60 ± 1.31
Trolox23.27 ± 1.0529.99 ± 1.04
SC50; Radical scavenging capacity at 50%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aguilar, G.; Calva, J.; Cartuche, L.; Salinas, M.; Armijos, C. Chemical Constituents, Enantiomer Content, Antioxidant and Anticholinesterase Activities of Valeriana microphylla Kunth Essential Oil. Plants 2023, 12, 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112155

AMA Style

Aguilar G, Calva J, Cartuche L, Salinas M, Armijos C. Chemical Constituents, Enantiomer Content, Antioxidant and Anticholinesterase Activities of Valeriana microphylla Kunth Essential Oil. Plants. 2023; 12(11):2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aguilar, Gabriela, James Calva, Luis Cartuche, Melissa Salinas, and Chabaco Armijos. 2023. "Chemical Constituents, Enantiomer Content, Antioxidant and Anticholinesterase Activities of Valeriana microphylla Kunth Essential Oil" Plants 12, no. 11: 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop