Next Article in Journal
Colored Shade Nets Can Relieve Abnormal Fruit Softening and Premature Leaf Senescence of “Jumeigui” Grapes during Ripening under Greenhouse Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation and Characterization of Werneria Chromene and Dihydroxyacidissimol from Burkillanthus malaccensis (Ridl.) Swingle
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Divergence without Distinct Species Relationships Indicate Early Stage Ecological Speciation in Species of the Rhododendronpseudochrysanthum Complex Endemic to Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Profile and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils of Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench. and Helichrysum italicum (Roth.) G. Don
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/plants11091228
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Essential Oil Yield, Composition, and Bioactivity of Sagebrush Species in the Bighorn Mountains

by
Valtcho D. Zheljazkov
1,*,
Charles L. Cantrell
2,
Ekaterina A. Jeliazkova
1,
Tess Astatkie
3 and
Vicki Schlegel
4
1
Crop and Soil Science Department, Oregon State University, 3050 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
2
Natural Products Utilization Research, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
3
Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
4
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 326 Food Technology Complex, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(9), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091228
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 28 April 2022 / Published: 1 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in the Research of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Origin with Nutraceutical and Pharmaceutical Potential)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) are dominant wild plants in large areas of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, and they include several species and subspecies. The aim was to determine if there are significant differences in essential oil (EO) yield, composition, and biological activity of sagebrush within the Bighorn Mountains, U.S. The EO yield in fresh herbage varied from 0.15 to 1.69% for all species, including 0.25–1.69% in A. tridentata var. vaseyana, 0.64–1.44% in A. tridentata var. tridentata, 1% in A. tridentata var. wyomingensis, 0.8–1.2% in A. longifolia, 0.8–1% in A. cana, and 0.16% in A. ludoviciana. There was significant variability in the EO profile between species, and subspecies. Some EO constituents, such as α-pinene (0–35.5%), camphene (0–21.5%), eucalyptol (0–30.8%), and camphor (0–45.5%), were found in most species and varied with species and subspecies. The antioxidant capacity of the EOs varied between the species and subspecies. None of the sagebrush EOs had significant antimicrobial, antimalarial, antileishmanial activity, or contained podophyllotoxin. Some accessions yielded EO with significant concentrations of compounds including camphor, eucalyptol, cis-thujone, α-pinene, α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, grandisol, para-cymene, and arthole. Therefore, chemotypes can be selected and possibly introduced into culture and be grown for commercial production of these compounds to meet specific industry needs.

1. Introduction

The genus Artemisia, distributed mostly in the Northern hemisphere, comprises small herbs and shrubs of over 500 species occurring in North America, Europe, and Asia [1]. Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) are woody shrub species of the genus and the dominant wild species in large areas of Western United States, Canada, and Mexico. They occupy around 69 million ha in the Western United States alone [2,3]. The woody sagebrush include several species such as big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.), black sagebrush (Artemisia nova A. Nelson), silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana Pursh), several subspecies and hybrids (crosses) between these [4], distributed in various states and provinces in North America [5]. Sagebrush communities contribute to the survival of various wildlife species, especially the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus) [3,6,7,8,9]. Pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana) is thought to have evolved with sagebrush and is now perhaps the only animal species to browse it extensively, whereas sage-grouse is endemic for sagebrush ranges. Other bigger animals, such as mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus canadensis), and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), browse sagebrush. It may also be browsed by domestic sheep and cattle especially during the winter months, when the ground is covered with snow and there is limited other forage available [10,11]. The grazing and browsing of big and small sagebrush by wild ungulates and cattle have been shown to modify density of sagebrush species and to shift the species composition [12]. Sagebrush density habitat changes have been shown to affect mortality of pronghorn [13]. The importance of sagebrush rangelands for many animal and bird species has been outlined in the literature; sagebrush affords habitats for obligate species (the ones that live only in sagebrush ecosystems) and facultative species (the animals that may use sagebrush ecosystems and other ecosystems) [3].
In addition to providing cover for wildlife, sagebrush is extensively used in the reclamation of disturbed lands, especially in oil and natural gas exploration and development areas, which started in the 1920s and peaked in 2010–2013. Oil and gas exploration, renewable energy such as wind and solar developments, and intensification of recreational activities have all been affecting sagebrush and associated species, such as sage-grouse, habitat [14,15]. Fragmentation of habitat by anthropogenic activities such as mining and energy developments has generally had a negative effect on the sagebrush and sage-grouse population in Wyoming, where 37% of sage-grouse population resides [14,15].
Sagebrush species have been used extensively by native peoples in North America as medicinal plants [16]. A comprehensive review on sagebrush species research conducted in North America provided insights into the evolution, botany and taxonomy, phytochemical complexity, and also pharmacological findings [17]. Sagebrush EO and extracts have shown antifungal activity [16,18,19]. A study with extracts from 100 medicinally active plants reported that extracts of aerial parts of A. ludoviciana and A. tridentata (among other species) had significant fungal inhibitory activity [16].
Sagebrush plant species contain substantial amounts of EO with a strong specific aroma; however, the EO is toxic [20]. The EO of aboveground plant parts of sagebrush species, including A. tridentata, has been investigated in the past [21,22]. However, the EO yield, composition, and antimicrobial activity of different sagebrush species are yet to be fully characterized. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be significant between-species (interspecies) and within-species (intraspecies) variations of EO yield, composition, and antimicrobial activity. The objective of this study was to assess sagebrush species in the Bighorn Mountains area of Wyoming, and their EO yield, composition, and bioactivity.

2. Results and Discussion

There were two separate collections of sagebrush (in 2011 and in 2014) that were treated as two different studies. Response variables were compared within each collection.

2.1. The 2011 Collections

In the 2011 collection, 13 accessions were identified as A. tridentata Natt. var. vaseyana, and were collected from elevations ranging from 1907 to 2980 m; 3 accessions were A. longifolia, collected at elevations ranging from 1147 to 1166 m; 2 accessions were A. cana var. cana, collected at elevations of 1292 and 1333 m; another 2 accessions were A. tridentata var. tridentata, collected at 2141 and 2299 m; 1 accession was identified as A. ludoviciana ssp. ludoviciana, collected at 1643 m; 1 accession identified as A. tridentata var. wyomingensis, collected at 1453 m (Table 1).

2.1.1. Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana

The chemical constituents found in the oil of the A. tridentata var. vaseyana accessions ranged from 13 to 48 per accession (Table S1). However, the amassed number of identified constituents amounted to 116 different constituents, indicating significant variability in the EO profile within the A. tridentata var. vaseyana subspecies. The major constituents present in the EO of A. tridentata var. vaseyana were α-pinene at 35.5% in accession #210, camphor at 45.4% for accession #212, eucalyptol at 17.9% for accession #211, chrysanthenone at 17.9% for accession #201, fragranol at 20.3% and grandisol at 36.2% for accession #203 (Table S1). A previous study found 42 constituents in the EO obtained by steam distillation from leaves and branches of A. tridentata, with camphor, camphene, and 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) accounting to 28.6, 16.9, and 13.2% of the total oil [23].

2.1.2. Artemisia tridentata var. tridentata

The chemical constituents found in the EO of A. tridentata var. tridentata are listed in Table S2 and were 24 and 27 for accession #221 and #222, respectively. Camphor, eucalyptol, chrysanthenone, and camphene were the major EO constituents for accession #221. For accession #222, the major EO constituents were camphor, camphene, eucalyptol, and α-pinene (Table S2).

2.1.3. Artemisia tridentata var. wyomingensis

The 18 EO constituents found in the oil of A. tridentata var. wyomingensis accession are listed in Table S3. Camphor, arthole, α-santoline alcohol, and eucalyptol were the major constituents at 20.6, 17.4, 14.8, and 13.0%, respectively.

2.1.4. Artemisia cana

Among the 30 identified constituents in the EO of A. cana, camphor, eucalyptol, α-santoline alcohol, and arthole were the major constituents in accession #219 at 35.3%, 15.3%, 11.3%, and 9.0%, respectively (Table S4). The major constituents in the EO of accession #220 were camphor, eucalyptol, camphene, and arthole at 40.6%, 20.5%, 6.6%, and 6.2% of the total oil, respectively.

2.1.5. Artemisia longifolia

The chemical constituents found in the EO of A. longifolia are listed in Table S5. Among the 30 identified constituents, 11, 12, and 9 constituents were present above 1% in the oil of accessions #216, 217, and 218 accounting for 90.9%, 90.9%, and 91.4%, respectively. Eucalyptol at 30.8% was the major constituent in the EO of accession #216, while camphor was the major constituent at 27.7% and 43.4% in the EO of accessions #217 and #218, respectively.

2.1.6. Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. ludoviciana

Among the 33 constituents found in the EO of A. ludoviciana ssp. ludoviciana accession, 9 were present at concentrations of above 1% and accounted for 90% of the oil (Table S6). Among these 9 constituents, camphor, eucalyptol, camphene, and borneol were present at concentrations of 46.2%, 17.9%, 13.3%, and 4.6%, respectively.

2.2. The 2014 Collections

In the 2014 collection, 3 accessions were identified as A. tridentata var. vaseyana, collected at elevations of 2172, 2300, and 2895 m; 2 accessions were A. tridentata var. wyomingensis, collected at elevations of 1192 and 2524 m; and 7 accessions as A. cana var. cana, collected at elevations ranging from 1105 to 1136 m (Table 1).

2.2.1. Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana

The number of identified chemical constituents found in the EO of A. tridentata var. vaseyana leaves obtained by hydro-distillation were 19, 28, and 9 for accessions #259, 261, and 262, respectively (Table S7). Artemiseole at 42.8%, camphor at 53.6%, and cyclooctadiene at 38.3% were the major constituents in the oils of accessions #259, 261, and 262, respectively.

2.2.2. Artemisia tridentata var. wyomingensis

There were 27 identified constituents in the EO obtained by hydro-distillation of A. tridentata var. wyomingensis inflorescences. However, the identified constituents in the EO obtained by hydro-distillation of leaves were 13 for accession #251 and 27 for #260, with 7 out of these 13 constituents and 14 out of the 27 constituents unique to each accession (Table S8). Artemiseole at 32.6% and 26.3% was the major constituent in the EO of the leaves or inflorescences, respectively, for accession #251. Cis-thujone at 71% was the major constituent in the oil obtained from the leaves of accession #260.

2.2.3. Artemisia cana var. cana

The 28 identified constituents in the EO of either leaves or inflorescences of A. cana var. cana accessions obtained by hydro-distillation are presented in Table S9. Camphor and eucalyptol were the major EO constituents for both leaves and inflorescences of A. cana Pursh var. cana accessions, except for accession #253. The major oil constituents for the leaves and inflorescences of accession #253 were ortho-cymene/para-cymene and α-phellandrene. Eucalyptol and camphor were the two major EO constituents in A. cana flowers, leaves, and stalks, collected from the Central Alberta Prairies, western Canada, although in different concentrations [24].
Overall, the results from this study demonstrated significant variation in EO content and composition in sagebrush species and subspecies collected from the Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming. Previous research from Oregon reported differences in EO composition between the three main subspecies of A. tridentata: wyomingensis, tridentata, and vaseyna [21]. The major constituents were methacrolein, camphene, artemiseole, eugenol, and artemisia ketone, with wide variations between and within the subspecies [21]. The wide variation in the concentration of individual chemical constituents between and within a subspecies is generally consistent with the results from this study. However, the chemical profile of the three Artemisia tridentata subspecies presented in the previous research from Oregon [21] is different from the ones in this study, which underlines the possibility for the existence of even greater chemical diversity among A. tridentata subspecies.
Earlier report on A. tridentata identified camphor (40–45%) and eucalyptol (1,8-Cineole), α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, thujone, and α-phellandrene being the major constituents; however, the exact subspecies was not identified [25].
The EO of A. ludoviciana var. latiloba from South Dakota was characterized with high concentration of oxygenated monoterpenes, such as camphor (20%), borneol, (around 15%), and eugenol (around 10%); however, it was obtained from a single accession [26]. Eugenol and camphor were also among the major constituents of the EO of A. longifolia and A. ludoviciana, and the latter contained significant amount of davanone [19].

2.3. Essential Oil Yield

The EO yield of the species and subspecies collected in 2011 varied widely, from 0.15% to 1.69% in fresh herbage within Artemisia spp. (Figure 1). Within A. tridentata var. vaseyana alone, the EO yield of fresh herbage varied from 0.25 to 1.69%. The EO yield within A. longifolia varied from 0.8 to 1.2%, whereas the EO yield in A. cana was 0.8–1% (not significantly different within the species), while the EO yield of A. ludoviciana was only 0.16%, in A. tridentata var. tridentata EO the yield was 0.64–1.44% and was 1% in A. tridentata var. wyomingensis (Figure 1). The EO yield of the species and subspecies collected in 2014 varied within and between species (Table S10). EO obtained by hydrodistillation of A. tridentata var. vaseyana leaves was 0.23% on average and varied from 0.06 to 0.42% (Table S10). Essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of A. tridentata var. wyomingensis leaves or inflorescences was 0.89 and 1.15%, respectively (Table S10). The EO obtained from A. cana var. cana leaves was 0.47% on average and varied from 0.04 to 0.96%, while the average EO content of inflorescences was 0.61% and varied from 0.17 to 1.10% (Table S10).

2.4. The Essential Oil Constituents Found in All Artemisia Species

Alpha-pinene was found in the EO of most species and subspecies with the exception of two accessions of A. tridentata var. vaseyana, #205 and 206, collected at elevations of 2980 and 2825 m, respectively. The concentration of α-pinene in the oil varied from undetectable amounts to 35.5% in A. tridentata var. vaseyana; the concentration of this monoterpene in the oils of the other Artemisia species did not vary significantly within a species (Table 2). Alpha-pinene, an alkene (C10H16), is a major constituent in orange peel EO, but also in the EO of many other species ranging from Cannabis sativa, Rosemarinus officinalis to Pinus ssp. [27,28,29]. Mercier et al. (2009) [28] have reviewed the many biological effects of α- and β-pinenes (in turpentine and its fractions). Table 3 shows the square root of Mean Squares Error (MSE) of the studied variables that estimates the common standard deviation (σ).
Similar to α-pinene, camphene (another monoterpene) was found in all Artemisia species and subspecies with the exception of the same two accessions of A. tridentata var. vaseyana (#205 and 206). Camphene concentrations varied from undetectable amounts to 13.8% within A. tridentata var. vaseyana, from 10.5 to 21.5% in A. tridentata var. tridentata, and was 6.6% in A. tridentata var. wyimingensis. Camphene concentration was 5.8–7% in A. longifolia, 6.6–7.4% in A. cana, and 13.3% in A. ludoviciana, and did not vary significantly within these species.
Similar to α-pinene and camphene, eucalyptol was found in all Artemisia species and subspecies with the exception of the same two accessions #205 and 206 of A. tridentata. The concentration of eucalyptol varied from undetectable amounts to 30.8%; its concentration in A. tridentata was 0–21.2%, 24.6–30.8% in A. longifolia, 15.3–20.5% in A. cana, and 17.9% in A. ludoviciana (Table 2). The monoterpenoid eucalyptol (1,8 cineole), is a common EO constituent in other plant species and especially in eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), Artemisia vestita, bay laurel (Laurus nobilis), but also in a number of other plants such as ginger (Zingiber officinale) and even a chemotype of lavender (Lavandula stoechas) [27,30,31,32,33,34]. Eucalyptol has wide applications as flavoring agent in consumer products such as mouthwashes, in perfumery and cosmetics, in cigarettes, and also in food products at low concentrations. Research has shown that eucalyptol has anti-inflammatory and anti-depressive effects [27].
Similar to α-pinene, camphene, and eucalyptol, camphor was found in all Artemisia species and subspecies with the exception of the same two accessions #205 and #206 of A. tridentata. Overall, the concentration of camphor varied from undetectable amounts to 45.5% in the oil of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, from 24.2 to 43.4% in the oil of A. longifolia, 35.2–40.6% in the oil of A. cana (Table 2). The waxy aromatic solid, camphor, a terpenoid (C10H16O), is isolated from wood of camphor tree, Cinnamomum camphora, and is also found in EO from other species such as Cedrus libani, Ocimum kilimandscharicum, A. annua, A. vestita, Piper angustifolium, Sassafras albidum, and Rosmarinus officinalis among others. Camphor has been known for centuries as an aromatic substance, and it has been used in ancient China and Japan, in other Asian countries and in Europe medicinally, but also in culinary applications and cosmetics [35]. It is a toxic substance with various biological activities ranging from antimicrobial, antiviral, insecticidal, and antitussive to anticancer activities [35,36].
Trans-α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, and grandisol were found in the EOs of the collected accessions #201, 202, 203, 205, and 206 of A. tridentata var. vasseyana (Table 4). Additionally, trans-α-necrodol-acetate was found in the collected accessions #214 and 215 of A. tridentata var. vasseyana. The concentration of trans-α-necrodol-acetate varied from undetectable amounts (in most accessions) to 45.1% in A. tridentata var. vasseyana; this compound was not found in the oils of the other species (Table 4). Alpha-necrodol acetate (C12H20O2) is a rather rare constituent in plants and has been reported in the EO of two other plant species, Lavandula suisieri [37,38] and Evolvulus alsinoides (slender dwarf morning glory) [39].
The concentration of fragranol varied from 5.7 to 20.3% in the above-mentioned collected accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, whereas the concentration of grandisol varied from 6.5 to 36.2% in the same accessions (Table 4). The monoterpene grandisol (C10H18O) is used as pheromone (sex attractant) for agricultural pests such as cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) and other weevils [40]. It has been reported in the EO of other Artemisia species such as A. vestita [32] and also in Achillea falcata [41].
Trans-arbusculone was found in the oils of only two collected accessions (#209 and 210) of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, and its concentration was 2.3–3.1% of the oil. Trans-pinocarveol was found in four accessions (#207, 209, 210, and 215) of A. tridentata var. vasseyana and its concentration varied from 2 to 24.8% of the oil.
Chrysanthenone was found in the oils of three accessions (#201, 202, and 207) of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, and its concentration ranged from 1.2 to 21.6% of the oil (Table 4).
Borneol was not found in A. tridentata, it was only present in the oils of A. longifolia, A. cana, and A. ludoviciana, and its concentration was 2.3–2.6% in the oils of A. longifolia and A. cana and 4.6% in the oil of A. ludoviciana (Table 5). Pinocarvone was found in six accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana only and its concentration varied from 1.2 to 6.9% of the oil. The monoterpene 4-terpineol was found in four accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana and also in A. longifolia and A. cana. The concentration of 4-terpineole varied from 0.9 to 1.4% in the oil of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, from 1.7 to 2.5% in the oil of A. longifolia, and 1.5–2.1% in the oil of A. cana. Santolina triene was found in two accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana (#214, 215), and also in the oils of A. tridentata var. tridentata, A. logifolia, and A. cana. The concentration of santolina triene was 1.7–2.5% in the oil of A. tridentata, 3.5–3.7% in A. cana, and varied from 2.7 to 6.8% in the oil of A. longifolia.
Arthole was found in the oils of the same two accession of A. tridentata vasseyana, in A. tridentata var. tridentata, in A. tridentata var. wyomingensis, and in the oils of A. longifolia and A. cana. The concentration of arthole was 10.3 and 13.0% in the oils of A. tridentata var. vasseyana, 3.8% in the oil of A. tridentata var. tridentata, 20.1% in the oil of A. tridentata var. wyomingensis, from 3.2 to 9.7% in the oil of A. longifolia, and 6.2 and 9.0% in the oil of A. cana (Table 5).
Gama-terpinene was found in the oil of two accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana (at 1.0 and 2.2%), in A. longifolia (1.5–2.5% range) and in A. cana (1.7–1.8%) (Table 6). Alpha-santoline alcohol was found in the same two accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana (at 3.7 and 5.9%), in two accessions of A. longifolia (at 6.0 and 7.6%), and in one accession of A. cana (at 11.3%). Chrysanthemyl alcohol was found only in the same two accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana (at 4.4 and 11.4%). Beta-pinene was only found in the oil of one accession of A. tridentata var. tridentata at 2.2% concentration (Table 6).
The following more significant oil constituents were only found in one or two accessions of A. tridentata var. vasseyana and did not vary within the accessions: periritenone (average concentration of 4.1%) in three accessions, artemisyl acetate (2.9%) in one accession, myrtenol (at 1.2%) in two accessions, borneol/lavandulol (1.9%) in two accessions, trans-arbusculone (1.9%) in one accession, piperitenone/citronellyl acetate (at 7.3%) in two accessions (Table 7).

2.5. Antioxidant Capacity of Artemisia Species and Subspecies

The antioxidant capacity of the EOs varied between the species and subspecies, with the highest being 80.5 μmol/g for A. tridentata var. wyomingensis and 60.5 μmol/g in A. tridentata var. tridentata; the antioxidant capacity of the rest of the oils was not different from the antioxidant capacity of the oils from the above two species (Table 8). This is the first report on antioxidant activity of the EO of the sagebrush species tested in this study; however, there is a previous report on A. tridentata var. wyomingensis leaf extract (70% ethanol extraction for 24 h) [42], but not on sagebrush EO.
None of the accessions contained any podophyllotoxin, indicating that Artemisia species and subspecies collected in this study did not contain podophyllotoxin.

2.6. Antileishmanial Evaluations

Compounds from some other Artemisia species (e.g., the endoperoxide artemisinin from A. annua) were reported to possess leishmanicidal activity [43]. Compounds extracted from A. aucheri have shown antileishmanial effect [44]. Ethanol extract from A. absinthium was found to be effective against Leishmania major L. in vitro [45]. The essential oil of A. absinthium was also reported to have promise as active compounds source against Leishmania [46].
In this study, representative essential oil samples from each of the species A. cana Pursh var. cana, A. longifolia, A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata, A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana, and A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis were each evaluated against Leishmania donovani promastigotes and none demonstrated activity above 50% inhibition when evaluated at 80 μg/mL (Table S11). The bioassays used in this study are suited for the discovery of new therapeutic agents and hence the concentrations used in the analysis were much lower than those in previous studies.

2.7. Antiplasmodial Evaluations

Representative essential oil samples from each of the species A. cana Pursh var. cana, A. longifolia, A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata, A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana, and A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis were evaluated against Plasmodium falciparum D6 at 15,867 ng/mL and none of them demonstrated activity above 50% inhibition to warrant secondary evaluations for LC50 determinations (Table S11).

2.8. Antimicrobial Evaluations

Representative essential oil samples from each of the species A. cana Pursh var. cana, A. longifolia, A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata, A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana, and A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis were evaluated against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium intracellulare, but none of them demonstrated activity above 50% inhibition when evaluated at 50 μg/mL (Table S12).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection of the Plant Material

Two separate collections of sagebrush species were conducted and included in this study. In 2011, we conducted a comprehensive study in the Bighorn Mountains area to identify the species of sagebrush and analyze their EO content, profile, and bioactivity. Accessions were collected from a total of 22 sites at various elevations (1150–2988 m a.s.l.) (Table 1). In a separate study conducted in 2014, additional accessions were collected from 12 sites at elevations ranging from 1108 to 2902 m a.s.l. (Table 1). The sagebrush aboveground herbage was collected from each collection site, and the GPS coordinates were recorded (Table 1). Plant material from each collection site was identified by Ms. Bonnie Heidel at the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, at the University of Wyoming (http://www.uwyo.edu/wyndd/about-wyndd/staff/bonnie-heidel.html), accessed on 28 April 2022.
The majority of the collected accessions belonged to the big sagebrush subspecies: A. tridentata Natt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Beetle (mountain big sagebrush), A. tridentata Natt. var. wyomingensis Beetle and Young (Wyoming big sagebrush), and A. tridentata Natt. var. tridentata (basin big sagebrush). The most frequent and widespread species was A. tridentata Natt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.). In addition, we collected and identified the following species in the area: Artemisia cana Pursh (silver sagebrush), A. ludoviciana Nutt. (white sagebrush), and A. longifolia Nutt. (longleaf wormwood).

3.2. Essential Oil Extraction

3.2.1. Steam Distillation

Subsamples of Artemisia species and subspecies collected in 2011 were subjected to steam distillation for extraction of the EO. Representative samples of 500 g fresh material that included all aboveground plant parts, leaves, inflorescences, and annual stems not thicker than 2 mm were cut into approximately 2.5 cm long pieces. Then, each sample was immediately placed into the bioflask of 2 L steam distillation units (HeartMagic, Rancho Santa Fe, CA, USA) and steam distilled for 60 min as described previously for spearmint and peppermint [47,48].

3.2.2. Hydro-Distillation

Essential oil from the accession samples collected in 2014 was extracted via hydro-distillation. A 100 g fresh plant biomass sample consisting of stems and leaves only or inflorescences only, cut into approximately 2.5 cm long pieces, was placed into a 2 L boiling flask along with 1.5 L water and distilled for 60 min.
Distillation time was measured from when the first drop of EO appeared in the glass Florentine vessel (the separator), and at the end of the 60 min period, the power was shut down and the distillation discontinued. After the distillation of each sample, the water was drained from the Florentine vessel and the oil was collected in a glass vial and placed in a freezer. The collected EOs were separated from the remaining water, measured on an analytical scale, and the oil content (oil yield) was calculated as grams of oil per 100 g of fresh aboveground sagebrush biomass. Afterward, the EO samples were stored in at −5 °C in a freezer until the oils were analyzed for chemical profile on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

3.3. Gas Chromatography (GC) Mass Spectroscopy (MS) of the Sagebrush Species Essential Oil (EO)

The GC-MS analysis of the sagebrush EO samples was conducted as described previously [49]. Briefly, the sagebrush EO samples (all samples in three replicates) were analyzed on a GC-MS instrument (Hewlett Packard Model 6890; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The carrier gas was helium at a mean speed of 40 cm/s−1, at 11.7 psi (60 °C), and a constant flow rate at 2.5 mL/min−1. The injection was split 60:1, 0.5 µL, with 220 °C injector temperature. The GC oven temperature program was as described previously: 60 °C for 1 min and 10 °C/min to 250 °C. The column was HP-INNOWAX (crosslinked polyethylene glycol; 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.5 mm), and the flame ionization detector temperature was 275 °C. The sagebrush EO constituents were expressed as percentage of all the constituents in the EO. The identification of individual constituent peaks was completed using standard compounds, through retention index values and through MS spectra comparison.

3.4. Podophyllotoxin Extraction and Measurements

The Artemisia samples collected in 2011 were also subjected to chemical analyses for podophyllotoxin. The podophyllotoxin extraction and purification followed a previously described procedures [50] and as described in a podophyllotoxin analyses of Juniperus paper [51].

3.5. Antimicrobial, Antimalarial, and Antileishmanial Activity and Cytotoxicity

The EO from the accessions collected in 2011 were submitted for analyses of antimicrobial, antimalarial, and antileishmanial activity and cytotoxicity. The assays were conducted at The University of Mississippi, National Center for Natural Products Research using methods developed at the Center and as described previously [51].

3.6. Antioxidant Activity of the EOs of Artemisia Species and Subspecies from This Study

The antioxidative capacity of the Artemisia oils collected in 2011 was determined by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) [52,53] and as described previously [54]. All samples were taken in triplicate.

3.7. Statistical Analyses of the Data

Analysis of variance was completed for EO yield, antioxidant activity, and the concentrations of α-pinene, camphene, eucalyptol, camphor, trans-α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, grandisol, piperitenone/citronellyl acetate, borneol, trans-pinocarveol, cis-arbusculone, pinocarvone, 4-terpineol, myrtenol, santolina triene, borneol/lavandulol, arthole, gamma-terpinene, α-santoline alcohol, chrysanthemyl alcohol, beta-pinene, and chrysanthenone using either a nested design or a completely randomized design model, and both designs used 3 replications. A nested design (species, and subspecies nested within species effects in the model) was used for EO yield, and the constituents obtained from more than one species. However, for the constituents obtained only within a species, a completely randomized design was used to compare the subspecies. The analysis was completed using the Mixed Procedure of SAS [54], and for each response, the validity of model assumptions was verified by examining the residuals as described in [55]. Since the effects of species (where applicable) and subspecies were significant (with the exception of piperitenone/citronellyl acetate, myrtenol, and borneol/lavandulol where the subspecies were not significantly different), multiple means comparison of the subspecies was completed using Tukey’s multiple means comparison method at the 5% level of significance.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the EO composition and bioactivity of several sagebrush species in the Western United States, and the findings revealed wide variation in the EO yield and composition between the sagebrush species, as well as within a species or subspecies, partially confirming the hypothesis. These findings suggest the presence of chemotypes within some species of sagebrush.
The outcomes from this study refuted part of our hypothesis that the essential oil obtained from the sagebrush species would have antileishmanial, antimalarial, and antimicrobial activities. The hypothesis was based on reports of such activities for extracts and derivatives from other Artemisia species, such as A. annua, A. aucheri, A. absinthium. Synthetic 1,2-dioxanes were shown to possess leishmanicidal activity, whilst the natural endoperoxide artemisinin was not effective against L. donovani [43]. Compounds extracted from A. aucheri have shown antileishmanial effects against L. major [44]. Ethanol extract from A. absinthium was found to be effective against Leishmania major L. in vitro [45]. The EO of A. absinthium was also reported to have promise as active compounds against Leishmania [46]. It is worth noting that the bioassays used in this study are suited to the discovery of new therapeutic agents and the concentrations used in the analysis are perhaps much lower than the concentrations used in previous reports. In addition, we used whole oils from different Artemisia species.
The EOs of the sagebrush species in this study did not show significant antimicrobial activities, which contradicts other reports [18]. Most probably, the differences between the antimicrobial activity of the tested EO in this study and literature reports were due to the following: (1) higher concentrations used in the previous reports; (2) different assays; (3) differences in chemical constituents of the EOs in this study vs. literature reports. Indeed, a report [18] found differences in antifungal activity between different populations of A. tridentata. The authors of the report explained these differences with compositional dissimilarities of secondary metabolites between the different populations with respect to antifungal activity.
Overall, wild grown sagebrush species and subspecies seem to be a largely untapped resource for EO with interesting and possibly desirable composition. Some of the accessions have yielded EO with significant concentrations of compounds such as camphor, eucalyptol, cis-thujone, α-pinene, α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, grandisol, para-cymene, and arthole among others. Therefore, chemotypes can be selected and possibly introduced into culture and be grown for commercial production of these compounds.
The results of our studies suggest immense chemical diversity exists that presents an opportunity for the selection of chemotypes/varieties with high concentration of EO with desirable composition.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11091228/s1, Table S1: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation of A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S2: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation of A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S3: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis (Beetle and Young) Welsh accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S4: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation of A. cana Pursh var. cana accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S5: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation of A. longifolia Nutt. accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S6: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by steam distillation of A. ludoviciana Nutt. ssp. ludoviciana accessions biomass collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S7: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of A. tridentata var. vaseyana accessions biomass (leaves) collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S8: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of A. tridentata var. wyomingensis accessions biomass (leaves or inflorescences) collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S9: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) of constituents in essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of A. cana var. cana accessions biomass (leaves or inflorescences) collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming; Table S10: Mean (using n = 3) content (%) and range of EO obtained by hydrodistillation for accessions from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming in the Fall of 2014; Table S11. Evaluation of select essential oils against Leishmania donovani and Plasmodium falciparum D6. Data are percent inhibition. Primary evaluations performed at 80 ug/mL for L. donovani and 15,867 ng/mL for P. falciparum D6; Table S12. Evaluation of select essential oils against opportunistic infection pathogens. Primary evaluations performed at 50 ug/mL and data are percent inhibition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D.Z. and E.A.J.; methodology, V.D.Z., C.L.C., E.A.J. and V.S.; software, T.A. and C.L.C.; validation, V.D.Z., C.L.C., E.A.J. and V.S.; formal analysis, T.A.; investigation, V.D.Z., C.L.C., E.A.J. and V.S.; resources, V.D.Z., C.L.C., E.A.J. and V.S.; data curation, V.D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D.Z.; writing—review and editing, C.L.C., E.A.J., T.A. and V.S.; visualization, T.A.; supervision, V.D.Z. and E.A.J.; project administration, V.D.Z. and E.A.J.; funding acquisition, V.D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by funded project “Landscape Restoration Through Science Based Reclamation and Education” by the Bureau of Land Management WY-State, Grant number L14AC00099. This study was also partially supported by the University of Wyoming and Oregon State University startup funding awarded to Dr. Valtcho D. Zheljazkov (Jeliazkov).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for issuing us a permit to sample sagebrush in the Bighorn National Forest. We thank Travis Fack, Natural Resource Specialist, and Clarke McClung, Tongue District Ranger, for helping with the permit. We are also thankful to Lyn Ciampa, Santosh Shiwakoti, and Shital Poudyal for their help with the collections of sagebrush accessions in the Big Horn Mountains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bora, K.S.; Sharma, A. The Genus Artemisia: A Comprehensive Review. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Boyle, S.A.; Reeder, D.R. Colorado Sagebrush: A Conservation Assessment and Strategy. Grand Junction: Colorado Division of Wildlife. 2005. Available online: https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/WildlifeSpecies/Sagebrush/CHAPTER0contentsfrontmatter.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  3. Dumroese, R.K. Sagebrush rangelands and greater sage-grouse in Northeastern California. In Northeastern California Plateaus Bioregion Science Synthesis; Dumroese, R.K., Moser, W.K., Eds.; Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-409; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2020; pp. 112–130. [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrd, D.W.; McArthur, E.D.; Wang, H.; Graham, J.H.; Freeman, D.C. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). VIII. Spatial and temporal pattern of terpenes. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1999, 27, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shultz, L.M. Artemisia. In Flora of North America: North of Mexico; Flora of North America Editorial Committee, Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 19, pp. 503–534. [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies, K.W.; Bates, J.D.; Johnson, D.D.; Nafus, A.M. Influence of mowing Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis on winter habitat for wildlife. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davis, A.J.; Phillips, M.L.; Doherty, P.F., Jr. Nest success of Gunnison sage-grouse in Colorado, USA. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dziba, L.E.; Provenza, F.D.; Villalba, J.J.; Atwood, S.B. Supplemental energy and protein increase use of sagebrush by sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 69, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Welch, B.L.; Pederson, J.C.; Rodrigues, R.L. Selection of big sagebrush by sage grouse. Great Basin Nat. 1988, 48, 274–279. [Google Scholar]
  10. Oldemeyer, J.L.; Barmore, W.J.; Gilbert, D.L. Winter ecology of Bighorn sheep in Yellowstone National Park. J. Wildl. Manag. 1971, 35, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sheehy, D.P.; Winward, A.H. Artemisia taxa to mule deer and sheep. J. Range Manag. 1981, 34, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Veblen, K.E.; Nehring, K.C.; McGlone, C.M.; Ritchie, M.E. Contrasting effects of different mammalian herbivores on sagebrush plant communities. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jacques, C.N.; Jenks, J.A.; Grovenburg, T.W.; Klaver, R.W. Influence of habitat and intrinsic characteristics on survival of neonatal pronghorn. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Copeland, H.E.; Pocewicz, A.; Naugle, D.E.; Griffiths, T.; Keinath, D.; Evans, J.; Platt, J. Measuring the effectiveness of conservation: A novel framework to quantify the benefits of sage-grouse conservation policy and easements in Wyoming. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Doherty, K.; Tack, J.D.; Evans, J.S.; Naugle, D.E. Mapping breeding densities of greater sage-grouse: A tool for range-wide conservation planning. In BLM Completion Report: Interagency Agreement # L10PG00911; Bureau of Land Management: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  16. McCutcheon, A.R.; Ellis, S.M.; Hancock, R.E.W.; Towers, G.H.N. Antifungal screening of medicinal plants of British Columbian native peoples. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 44, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Turi, C.E.; Shipley, P.R.; Murch, S.J. North American Artemisia species from the subgenus Tridentatae (Sagebrush): A phytochemical, botanical and pharmacological review. Phytochemistry 2014, 98, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Talley, S.M.; Coley, P.D.; Kursar, T.A. Antifungal leaf-surface metabolites correlate with fungal abundance in sagebrush populations. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28, 2141–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lopes-Lutz, L.; Alviano, D.S.; Alviano, C.S.; Kolodziejczyk, P.P. Screening of chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia essential oils. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1732–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jassbi, A.R.; Zamanizadehnajari, S.; Baldwin, I.T. Phytotoxic volatiles in the roots and shoots of Artemisia tridentata as detected by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry analysis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kelsey, R.G.; Wright, W.E.; Sneva, F.; Winward, A.; Britton, C. The concentration and composition of big sagebrush essential oils from Oregon. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1983, 11, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Epstein, W.W.; Gaudioso, L.A.; Brewster, G.B. Essential oil constituents of Artemisia tridentata rothrockii. The isolation and characterization of two new irregular monoterpenes. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2748–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borek, T.T.; Hochrein, J.M.; Irwin, A.N. Composition of the Essential Oils from Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniperus scopulorum), Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), and White Sage (Salvia apiana); SAND2003-3081; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2003; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lopes-Lutz, D.; Mckay, T.; Kolodziejczyk, P.P. Distribution of volatiles in Artemisia cana. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Buttkus, H.A.; Bose, R.J.; Shearer, D.A. Terpenes in the essential oil of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1977, 25, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Collin, G.; St-Gelais, A.; Turcotte, M.; Gagnon, H. Composition of the essential oil and of some extracts of the aerial parts of Artemisia ludoviciana var. latiloba Nutt. Am. J. Essent. Oils 2017, 5, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  27. Borges, R.S.; Ortiz, B.L.S.; Pereira, A.C.; Keita, H.; Carvalho, J.C.T. Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil: A review of its phytochemistry, anti-inflammatory activity, and mechanisms of action involved. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 229, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mercier, B.; Prost, J.; Prost, M. The essential oil of turpentine and its major volatile fraction α- and beta-pinenes. A review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2009, 22, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Sikora, V.; Dincheva, I.; Kačániová, M.; Astatkie, T.; Semerdjieva, I.B.; Latkovic, D. Industrial, CBD, and wild hemp: How different are their essential oil profile and antimicrobial activity? Molecules 2020, 25, 4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boukhatem, M.N.; Sudha, T.; Darwish, N.H.E.; Chader, H.; Belkadi, A.; Rajabi, M.; Houche, A.; Benkebailli, F.; Oudjida, F.; Mousa, S.A. A new eucalyptol-rich lavender (Lavandula stoechas L.) essential oil: Emerging potential for therapy against inflammation and cancer. Molecules 2020, 25, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Boukhatem, M.N.; Boumaiza, A.; Nada, H.G.; Rajabi, M.; Mousa, S.A. Eucalyptus globulus essential oil as a natural food preservative: Antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal properties in vitro and in a real food matrix (Orangina fruit juice). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chu, S.C.; Liu, Q.R.; Liu, Z.L. Insecticidal activity and chemical composition of the essential oil of Artemisia vestita from China against Sitophilus zeamais. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fidan, H.; Stefanova, G.; Kostova, I.; Stankov, S.; Damyanova, S.; Stoyanova, A.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Laurus nobilis L. essential oils from Bulgaria. Molecules 2019, 24, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stefanova, G.; Girova, T.; Gochev, V.; Stoyanova, M.; Petkova, Z.; Stoyanova, A.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Comparative study on the chemical composition of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) leaves from Greece and Georgia and the antibacterial activity of their essential oil. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, W.; Vermaak, I.; Viljoen, A. Camphor-a fumigant during the Black Death and a coveted fragrant wood in ancient Egypt and Babylon-a review. Molecules 2013, 18, 5434–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Manoharan, R.K.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J. Antibiofilm and antihyphal activities of cedar leaf essential oil, camphor, and fenchone derivatives against Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Garcia-Vallejo, M.C.M.I.; Sanz, J.; Bernabe, M.; Velasco-Negueruela, A. Necrodane (1, 2, 2, 3, 4-pentamethylcyclopentane) derivatives in Lavandula luisieri, new compounds to the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pombal, S.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Araújo, J.P.; Rocha, P.M.; Rodilla, J.M.; Diez, D.; Granja, Á.P.; Gomes, A.C.; Silva, L.A. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Portuguese Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas-Martinez and its relation with their chemical composition. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kashima, Y.; Miyazawa, M. Chemical composition and aroma evaluation of essential oils from Evolvulus alsinoides L. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Phillips, T.W.; West, J.R.; Foltz, J.L.; Silverstein, R.M.; Lanier, G.N. Aggregation pheromone of the deodar weevil, Pissodes nemorensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Isolation and activity of grandisol and grandisal. J. Chem. Ecol. 1984, 10, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Senatore, F.; Napolitano, F.; Arnold, N.A.; Bruno, M.; Herz, V. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Achillea falcata L. (Asteraceae). Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pu, X.Z.; Lam, L.; Gehlken, K.; Ulappa, A.C.; Rachlow, J.L.; Forbey, J.S. Antioxidant capacity of Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) varies spatially and is not related to the presence of a sagebrush dietary specialist. West. N. Am. Nat. 2015, 75, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ortalli, M.; Varani, S.; Rosso, C.; Quintavalla, A.; Lombardo, M.; Trombini, C. Evaluation of synthetic substituted 1, 2-dioxanes as novel agents against human leishmaniasis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 170, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saryazdi, A.K.P.; Ghaffarifar, F.; Dalimi, A.; Dayer, M.S. In-vitro and in-vivo comparative effects of the spring and autumn-harvested Artemisia aucheri Bioss extracts on Leishmania major. J. Enthopharmacol. 2020, 257, 112910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Azizi, K.; Shahidi-Hakak, F.; Asgari, Q.; Hatam, G.R.; Fakoorziba, M.R.; Miri, R.; Moemenbellah-Fard, M.D. In vitro efficacy of ethanolic extract of Artemisia absinthium (Asteraceae) against Leishmania major L. using cell sensitivity and flow cytometry assays. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Monzote, L.; Piñón, A.; Scull, R.; Setzer, W.N. Chemistry and leishmanicidal activity of the essential oil from Artemisia absinthium from Cuba. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Cannon, J.B.; Cantrell, C.L.; Astatkie, T.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Modification of yield and composition of essential oils by distillation time. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 41, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Cantrell, C.L.; Astatkie, T.; Hristov, A. Yield, content, and composition of peppermint and spearmints as a function of harvesting time and drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 11400–11407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Astatkie, T.; O’Brocki, B.; Jeliazkova, E. Essential oil composition and yield of anise from different distillation times. HortScience 2013, 48, 1393–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Canel, C.; Dayan, F.E.; Ganzera, M.; Khan, I.A.; Rimando, A.; Burandt, C.L., Jr.; Moraes, R.M. High yield of podophyllotoxin from leaves of Podophyllum peltatum by in situ conversion of podophyllotoxin 4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside. Planta Med. 2001, 67, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cantrell, C.L.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Osbrink, W.A.; Castro, A.; Maddox, V.; Craker, L.E.; Astatkie, T. Podophyllotoxin and essential oil profile of Juniperus and related species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Hampsch-Woodill, M.; Flanagan, J.; Demmer, E.K. Development and validation of oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay for lipophilic antioxidants using randomly methylate B-cylodextrin as the solubility enhancer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Hampsch-Woodill, M.; Flanagan, J.; Prior, R. High-throughput assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) using a multichannel liquid handling system coupled with a microplate fluorescence reader in 96-well format. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4437–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT®9.4 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  55. Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 10th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 01228 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean EO yield (%) from six species and their accessions collected in the fall of 2011 from the Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming. Means sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
Figure 1. Mean EO yield (%) from six species and their accessions collected in the fall of 2011 from the Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming. Means sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
Plants 11 01228 g001
Table
Table 1. Latin name, collection date, elevation and GPS coordinates for sagebrush accessions collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming in fall of 2011 and fall of 2014.
Table 1. Latin name, collection date, elevation and GPS coordinates for sagebrush accessions collected from Bighorn Mountains in Wyoming in fall of 2011 and fall of 2014.
AccessionLatin NameCollection
Date		Elevation,
m		GPS
Coordinates
201A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin24 August 20112383 −
202A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin24 August 2011240644.8048, −107.5413
203A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin24 August 2011255944.8126, −107.6095
204A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin24 August 2011237744.7888, −107.9297
205A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin26 August 2011298044.749, −107.7471
206A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin26 August 2011282544.7588, −107.7556
207A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin26 August 2011190744.7822, −107.968
209A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin23 September 2011225344.3156, −106.9416
210A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin23 September 2011239644.2512, −106.9562
211A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin23 September 2011242344.1571, −107.2517
212A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin23 September 2011222144.1325, −107.2526
213A. ludoviciana Nutt. ssp. ludoviciana26 September 2011164344.6327, −107.0786
214A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin26 September 2011215744.619, −107.1014
215A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin26 September 2011216444.6186, −107.1102
216A. longifolia Nutt.27 September 2011116644.8117, −106.9116
217A. longifolia Nutt.27 September 2011114744.8354, −106.8735
218A. longifolia Nutt.27 September 2011114944.8376, −106.8404
219A. cana Pursh var. cana27 September 2011129244.8233, −107.2269
220A. cana Pursh var. cana27 September 2011133344.826, −107.236
221A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata30 September 2011229944.569, −107.5337
222A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata30 September 2011214144.5742, −107.5666
223A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis (Beetle and Young) Welsh30 September 2011145344.0279, −107.5646
250Artemisia ssp.28 October 2014116644.8318, −106.8314
251A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis (Beetle and Young) Welsh28 October 2014119244.8318, −106.8338
252A. cana Pursh var. cana28 October 2014112844.8376, −106.8403
253A. cana Pursh var. cana28 October 2014112644.8433, −106.8407
254A. cana Pursh var. cana28 October 2014113644.8462, −106.8395
255A. cana Pursh var. cana29 October 2014111844.8925, −107.0287
256A. cana Pursh var. cana29 October 2014111944.8886, −107.0293
257A. cana Pursh var. cana29 October 2014113044.8887, −107.0327
258A. cana Pursh var. cana29 October 2014110544.8967, −107.0289
259A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin30 October 2014217244.618, −107.1121
260A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis (Beetle and Young) Welsh30 October 2014252444.7161, −107.4587
261A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin30 October 2014230044.5691, −107.5338
262A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin30 October 2014289544.6653, −107.5451
Table
Table 2. Mean composition of alpha-pinene, camphene, eucalyptol and camphor (all in %) from six species and corresponding accessions. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
Table 2. Mean composition of alpha-pinene, camphene, eucalyptol and camphor (all in %) from six species and corresponding accessions. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
SpeciesAccessionAlpha-PineneCampheneEucalyptolCamphor
A. tridentata va2013.8 def8.5 de1.1 i31.9 bcde
A. tridentata va2021.9 ef6.7 e2.4 i27.3 de
A. tridentata va2030.9 f0.1 g0.8 i0.3 h
A. tridentata va2042.9 def
A. tridentata va2071.6 ef8.4 de14.8 e29.3 cde
A. tridentata va20929.0 b2.9 fg12.3 g1.8 gh
A. tridentata va21035.5 a2.2 g12.8 fg0.6 h
A. tridentata va2115.3 d13.8 b17.9 d44.8 a
A. tridentata va2125.6 d13.6 bc14.1 ef45.4 a
A. tridentata va2141.3 ef6.5 e9.7 h13.5 fg
A. tridentata va21523.5 c2.1 g2.5 i3.2 gh
A. tridentata tr2213.2 def10.5 cd13.6 efg43.2 ab
A. tridentata tr2224.3 de21.5 a21.2 c41.3 ab
A. tridentata wy2231.1 ef6.6 e12.5 fg21.6 ef
A. tridentata wy2162.8 def5.8 ef30.8 a24.2 def
A. longifolia2172.8 def7.0 e24.6 b27.7 de
A. longifolia2183.2 def6.9 e25.5 b43.4 ab
A. longifolia2192.7 def7.4 de15.3 e35.2 abcd
A. cana2203.2 def6.6 e20.5 c40.6 abc
A. cana2131.9 ef13.3 bc17.9 d46.2 a
Within each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Tukey’s method.
Table
Table 3. Square root of mean squares error (MSE) that estimates the common standard deviation (σ).
Table 3. Square root of mean squares error (MSE) that estimates the common standard deviation (σ).
Variable M S E
EO yield0.073
antioxidant activity6.71
α-pinene0.949
camphene1.02
eucalyptol0.601
camphor3.66
trans-α-necrodol-acetate2.06
fragranol2.43
grandisol3.10
piperitenone/citronellyl acetate1.04
borneol0.154
trans-pinocarveol1.14
cis-arbusculone0.158
pinocarvone0.420
4-terpineol0.048
Myrtenol0.123
santolina triene0.304
borneol/lavandulol0.070
arthole1.09
gamma-terpinene0.063
α-santoline alcohol0.319
chrysanthemyl alcohol1.06
beta-pinene0.956
chrysanthenone4.17
Table
Table 4. Mean trans-α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, grandisol, cis-arbusculone, trans-pinocarveol and chrysanthenone (all in %) from 10 collections of the A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana.
Table 4. Mean trans-α-necrodol-acetate, fragranol, grandisol, cis-arbusculone, trans-pinocarveol and chrysanthenone (all in %) from 10 collections of the A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (Rydb.) Boivin. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana.
SpeciesAccession NumberTrans-α-Necrodol-AcetateFragranolGrandisolCis-ArbusculoneTrans-PinocarveolChrysanthenone
A. tridentata va2015.7 e5.7 c6.5 d 21.61 a
A. tridentata va20213.5 d12.4 bc17.6 c 1.21 b
A. tridentata va20325.9 c20.3 a36.2 a
A. tridentata va20534.8 b14.9 ab31.1 ab
A. tridentata va20645.1 a15.0 ab26.2 bc
A. tridentata va207 11.86 ab
A. tridentata va209 3.1 a24.8 a
A. tridentata va210 2.3 b20.9 b
A. tridentata va2148.2 de
A. tridentata va2154.8 e 6.0 c
Within each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Tukey’s method.
Table
Table 5. Mean borneol, pinocarvone, 4-terpineol, santolina triene and arthole (all in %) from six species and their corresponding collection number. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
Table 5. Mean borneol, pinocarvone, 4-terpineol, santolina triene and arthole (all in %) from six species and their corresponding collection number. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata; A. tridentata wy = A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis.
SpeciesAccession
Number		BorneolPinocarvone4-TerpineolSantolina TrieneArthole
A. tridentata va209 5.3 b1.3 e
A. tridentata va210 6.9 a1.4 de
A. tridentata va211 1.0 c1.1 f
A. tridentata va212 1.2 c0.9 g
A. tridentata va214 8.1 a 2.5 cde13.0 b
A. tridentata va215 1.9 c 1.8 de10.3 c
A. tridentata tr221 1.7 e3.8 f
A. tridentata wy223 20.1 a
A. longifolia2162.3 c 2.5 a2.7 cd9.7 cd
A. longifolia2172.4 bc 1.7 c6.8 a6.8 e
A. longifolia2182.4 bc 2.2 b3.1 bc3.2 f
A. cana2192.3 c 1.5 d3.5 b9.0 d
A. cana2202.6 b 2.1 b3.7 b6.2 e
A. ludoviciana2134.6 a 1.3 e2.2 de
Within each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Tukey’s method.
Table
Table 6. Mean gamma-terpinene, alpha-santoline alcohol, chrysanthemyl alcohol and beta-pinene (all in %) from four species and their subspecies. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata.
Table 6. Mean gamma-terpinene, alpha-santoline alcohol, chrysanthemyl alcohol and beta-pinene (all in %) from four species and their subspecies. Blank cells indicate the constituents were not obtained from these accessions. A. tridentata va = A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana; A. tridentata tr = A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata.
SpeciesAccession
Number		Gamma-
Terpinene		Alpha-
Santoline
Alcohol		Chrysanthemyl
Alcohol		Beta-Pinene
A. tridentata va204 7.23 a
A. tridentata va2141.0 e3.7 d11.37 a
A. tridentata va2152.2 b5.9 c4.44 b
A. tridentata tr222 2.21 b
A. longifolia2161.5 d7.6 b
A. longifolia2172.5 a6.0 c
A. longifolia2181.5 d
A. cana2191.8 c11.3 a
A. cana2201.7 cd
Within each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Tukey’s method.
Table
Table 7. Piperitenone/citronellyl acetate, artemisyl acetae, myrtenol, borneol/lavandulol, trans-rbusculone, sabinene, alpha-phellendrene, para-cymene and trans-ocimene that were obtained from only one accession (shown in bracket in Column 1) or without significant difference among accessions.
Table 7. Piperitenone/citronellyl acetate, artemisyl acetae, myrtenol, borneol/lavandulol, trans-rbusculone, sabinene, alpha-phellendrene, para-cymene and trans-ocimene that were obtained from only one accession (shown in bracket in Column 1) or without significant difference among accessions.
Species (Accession Numbers)ConstituentMean (%)
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (201, 202, 203)Piperitenone/citronellyl acetate4.13
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (209)Artemisyl acetae2.88
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (209, 210)Myrtenol1.2
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (211, 212)Borneol/Lavandulol1.9
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (215)Trans-arbusculone1.88
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (214, 215)Piperitenone/Citronellyl acetate7.26
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (204)Sabinene12.32
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (204)Alpha-phellendrene16.86
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (204)Para-cymene31.83
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana (204)Trans-ocimene0.94
Table
Table 8. Mean antioxidant activity (µM Trolox equivalents/g) of the essential oils from the five species.
Table 8. Mean antioxidant activity (µM Trolox equivalents/g) of the essential oils from the five species.
SpeciesAccession
Number		Antioxidant Activity
A. tridentata Nutt. var. vaseyana20763.1 ab
A. tridentata Nutt. var. tridentata22160.5 b
A. tridentata Nutt. var. wyomingensis22380.5 a
A. longifolia21673.4 ab
A. cana22071.5 ab
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level using Tukey’s method.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheljazkov, V.D.; Cantrell, C.L.; Jeliazkova, E.A.; Astatkie, T.; Schlegel, V. Essential Oil Yield, Composition, and Bioactivity of Sagebrush Species in the Bighorn Mountains. Plants 2022, 11, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091228

AMA Style

Zheljazkov VD, Cantrell CL, Jeliazkova EA, Astatkie T, Schlegel V. Essential Oil Yield, Composition, and Bioactivity of Sagebrush Species in the Bighorn Mountains. Plants. 2022; 11(9):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheljazkov, Valtcho D., Charles L. Cantrell, Ekaterina A. Jeliazkova, Tess Astatkie, and Vicki Schlegel. 2022. "Essential Oil Yield, Composition, and Bioactivity of Sagebrush Species in the Bighorn Mountains" Plants 11, no. 9: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop