Next Article in Journal
Effect of Exogenous Plant Debris and Microbial Agents on Phytoremediation of Copper-Contaminated Soil in Shanghai
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Soil Composition on Secondary Metabolites of Moroccan Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Essential Oils as Sprout Suppressants for Potato (Solanum tuberosum) at Room Temperature Storage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Iron–Improved Growth, Leaf Chemical Content, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Chinese Mandarin Trees Grown under Soil Salinity Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phosphorous Supplementation Alleviates Drought-Induced Physio-Biochemical Damages in Calligonum mongolicum

1
Xinjiang Key Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration Laboratory, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
3
Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystems, Cele 848300, China
4
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100045, China
5
CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
6
CREAF, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
7
Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires B1406, Argentina
8
Department of Botany, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
9
Department of Biological Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, 2462 Martonvásár, Hungary
10
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3054; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223054
Submission received: 12 September 2022 / Revised: 30 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022

Abstract

:
Calligonum mongolicum is a phreatophyte playing an important role in sand dune fixation, but little is known about its responses to drought and P fertilization. In the present study, we performed a pot experiment to investigate the effects of P fertilization under drought or well-watered conditions on multiple morpho-physio-biochemical attributes of C. mongolicum seedlings. Drought stress leads to a higher production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA), leading to impaired growth and metabolism. However, C. mongolicum exhibited effective drought tolerance strategies, including a higher accumulation of soluble sugars, starch, soluble protein, proline, and significantly higheractivities of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes. P fertilization increased the productivity of drought-stressed seedlings by increasing their growth, assimilative shoots relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation, mineral nutrition, N assimilation, and reduced lipid peroxidation. Our findings suggest the presence of soil high P depletion and C. mongolicum high P requirements during the initial growth stage. Thus, P can be utilized as a fertilizer to enhance the growth and productivity of Calligonum vegetation and to reduce the fragility of the hyper-arid desert of Taklamakan in the context of future climate change.

1. Introduction

The drylands have enormous socioeconomic and scientific values. For generations, arid regions have provided livelihoods to dependent communities through their biological and cultural diversity [1]. Despite this, global awareness of the importance of arid regions, and the effort required to manage and protect them, remains low [2,3]. Arid lands suffer irreparable damage due to biodiversity loss, unsustainable use, rigorous agricultural expansion, and global climate change [4]. As a result of such degradation, ground-water resources, valuable plant species, ecosystem productivity, and communities dependent on these systems may be severely affected. Arid lands host ecosystems that are particularly susceptible to climate change and unsustainable human activities [5]; hence, understanding their importance, threats to their biodiversity and productivity, and sustainable management is crucial to meeting global biodiversity conservation targets. Many arid and semi-arid regions of the world have been adversely affected by desertification [6]. Soil water and nutrients are closely related to each other, affecting plants’ development, growth, and productivity. These two groundwater components are essential for establishing and maintaining xerophytes [7]. Xerophytes refer to plant species that can survive prolonged periods of drought. They must extend their roots rapidly to acquire groundwater resources and reduce the threat of water deficit and nutrient limitation to adapt to hyper-arid desert conditions. However, juvenile seedlings are particularly vulnerable to water deficit conditions [8]. Generally, hyper-arid ecosystems are characterized by shallow water and extreme nutrient limitations (N & P), making spontaneous seedling establishment difficult for xerophytes. They, therefore, threaten natural vegetation renewal. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the response of young xerophytes to water and nutrient availability before their roots acquire groundwater resources. Water and nutrient availability can affect plant morphological and physio-biochemical metabolism. For instance, a lack of soil water and nutrients diminishes the process of photosynthesis via stomatal closure or metabolic changes. This leads to more excessive light energy absorption than the utilization of the photosynthetic apparatus, causing photoinhibition and photo-oxidative stress due to the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2) [9].
In response, plants have developed various protective mechanisms to counterbalance excess ROS production and prevent damage to photosynthetic machinery. These mechanisms involve alterations in light-harvesting antennae, the activation of antioxidant enzymatic activities (peroxidase [POD], catalase [CAT], superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione reductase [GR], etc.), and antioxidant metabolites (carotenoids, glutathione, ascorbate) [9]. Plants can accumulate compatible solutes (i.e., soluble sugars, proline) under drought stress to maintain their cell turgor, gas exchange capabilities, and growth [10]. Plant cells require large amounts of nitrogen (N), a key component of several biomolecules, including proteins, amino acids, nucleic acids, and other important metabolites. N is primarily absorbed by roots in the form of nitrate (NO3), which is transported to leaves for assimilation [11]. The enzyme nitrate reductase (NR) in the cytoplasm reduces NO3 to NO2, which is then transported to chloroplasts for assimilation into NH4+ by the action of nitrite reductase (NiR) [12]. The NH4+ assimilation into glutamine and subsequently into glutamate is carried out by glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GOGAT) [12]. Long-term water stress severely inhibits soil N mobility, resulting in a low N uptake, negatively impacting plant growth [13]. In addition, drought stress inhibits the ability of trees to metabolize N by disrupting its metabolizing enzyme activities. The scenario mentioned above indicates that N availability is strongly related to drought since drought severely changes accessibility and mineralization.
Plant growth requires P, which accounts for approximately 0.2% of the plant’s dry weight. However, approximately 80% of the total soil-P is immobile and inaccessible [14], inhibiting growth and metabolism. Therefore, the availability and uptake of P are critical to plant metabolism. For instance, in P-depleted plants, photosynthesis is hampered by the lack of P-containing metabolites involved in the primary metabolism [15]. In addition, P nutrition is closely related to NO3 uptake. For instance, a low P supply may reduce the NO3 uptake, causing reductions in the plants’ growth and dry matter production. Many studies suggest that P fertilization improves plant growth and productivity under drought stress [9,16,17,18,19]. As a result of P supplementation, soil P deficiency is reduced, plants can tolerate stress better, and physiological, morphological, and biochemical processes are altered, leading to increased plant growth [17,18,19,20].
The Taklamakan is a hyper-arid desert characterized by low soil organic matter, a high pH, and reduced water content. These factors commonly result in extremely low soil-P availability. It is dominated by perennial xerophytes, which play critical roles in stabilizing the ecosystems in both oases and deserts [1]. In recent decades, soil-P depletions, or the severe P nutritional conditions of xerophytes, have frequently been noticed in desert ecosystems [21,22]. In this hyper-arid region, severely P-depleted soils are detrimental to desert vegetation growth and survival [1]. Based on the increased occurrences of future severe drought events and N-deposition, xerophytes are more likely to be affected by soil-P shortages than other ecosystem plants [21]. Still, little is known about how xerophytes react to soil-P availability.
Calligonum mongolicum is a perennial shrub belonging to the family Polygonaceae. It is a popular choice for afforestation to fix and stabilize dunes. It is primarily found in the desert-oasis ecotone of the Taklamakan desert in northwestern China. Its assimilative shoots provide highly nutritious food for camels and sheep [23]. This species has been destroyed by overgrazing by local animals and excessive anthropogenic activities, which left the desert ecosystem vulnerable to drifting dunes. Consequently, the revegetation and restoration of Calligonum vegetation are urgently needed to protect the ecosystems of these oases against future climate change. Previously, C. mongolicum has been investigated for its root ecology [24], physiological responses to abiotic factors, including drought under N fertilization [25], and salinity under K supplementation [23].
To the best of our knowledge, no research has been published on whether P application can improve the drought tolerance of C. mongolicum. In arid regions, the seedling plantation has been widely used to restore vegetation, since natural restoration is difficult [26]. However, extreme environmental conditions in the hyperarid desert can severely affect the growth and metabolism of plants, particularly at the young seedling growth stages, causing a severe threat to their survival and establishment. This scenario makes planting young seedlings for vegetation restoration challenging in the hyperarid and saline and nutrients deficient (i.e., P) desert environment [1]. Therefore, investigating the impact of P supplementation on drought adaption strategies in young C. mongolicum seedlings will provide a theoretical framework for restoring Calligonum communities and protecting the fragile ecosystem of the Taklimakan desert.
Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the impact of P application and drought on the growth of C. mongolicum seedlings to establish conservation strategies to mitigate the negative consequences of future climate change.
In this study, we aimed to investigate(a) how P application (+P/−P) affects antioxidant mechanisms, N metabolism, and mineral nutrition of young C. mongolicum under water-stressed (25–30% field capacity) and well-watered (70–75% field capacity) conditions; and (b) the combined factors that influence its morpho-physio-biochemical characteristics in the hyper-arid desert. We evaluated plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, nonstructural carbohydrates and osmolytes, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes, N metabolism, and mineral nutrients to answer the above questions.

2. Results

Our study examined the effects of P fertilization on multiple morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes of C. mongolicum seedlings under well-watered and water-stressed conditions.

2.1. Changes in Growth Characteristics

We observed obvious changes in morphological traits under different levels of water and P fertilization (Figure 1A–E). Water-stressed plants displayed significant decreases in assimilative shoots relative water content (RWC; 30.95%), plant height (26.73%), and above- and below-ground biomass (44.29% and 43.31%, respectively), compared to well-watered plants, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 1A–D). In contrast, P fertilization caused a significant increment in assimilative shoots RWC under both water levels, compared to their unfertilized peers (Figure 1A). In water-stressed seedlings, P fertilization significantly increasedbelow-ground biomass (11.68%), as compared to their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 1D). However, P application had no significant impact on plant height and above-ground biomass under water-stressed conditions. On the contrary, P fertilization under well-watered conditions significantly increased plant height (7.81%) and above- and below-ground biomass (11.14% and 17.22%, respectively) (Figure 1B–D).

2.2. Changes in Chlorophyll a and Chlorophyll b Pigments

Drought conditions significantly decreased the concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) (20.87% and 9.10%, respectively) compared to well-watered conditions, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 2A,B). However, P fertilization more significantly increased the concentrations of Chla (27.07%) and Chlb (12.79%) in water stress fertilized seedlings than in unfertilized seedlings. Chla and Chlb increased by 20.21% and 25.48% more in well-watered seedlings treated with P fertilizer than those left unfertilized (Figure 2A,B). In addition, Chla and Chlb significantly decreased in water-stressed (13.05%) compared to well-watered conditions. However, P fertilization significantly increased Chla/b ratio (12.74%) in water-stressed seedlings compared to their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 2C).

2.3. Biochemical Changes

Soluble sugar and starch concentrations exhibited obvious changes in response to different water and P fertilization levels (Figure 3A,B). Drought significantly increased soluble sugar (31.31%) but decreased starch (9.90%) compared to well-watered conditions, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 3A,B). P fertilization exhibited the opposite effect on soluble sugar and starch in well-watered seedlings:decreased soluble sugar (7.62%) andincreased starch (11.29%), compared with their unfertilized counterparts. However, P fertilization significantly increased soluble sugar (12.02%), but the starch concentration remained unchanged in water-stressed seedlings compared to their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 3A,B).
The ratio of soluble sugar to starch (SS/ST) significantly increased (45.82%) in water-stressed seedlings compared to well-watered seedlings, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 3C). However, SS/ST significantly decreased in well-watered (16.99%) but increased in water-stressed seedlings (9.23%) under P fertilization (Figure 3C). Nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) were more significantly increased in water-stressed seedlings (12.91%) than in well-watered seedlings. NSCs levels were unaffected by P fertilization in well-watered seedlings, but significantly increased in water-stressed seedlings (8.67%) (Figure 3D). Water-stressed significantly decreased the concentration of soluble protein (51.29%) but increased proline (36.82%) compared to the well-watered condition (Figure 4A). P fertilization increased soluble protein (41.66%) in water-stressed seedlings, whereas it decreased proline (33.37%) in well-watered seedlings (Figure 4A,B).

2.4. Changes in ROS Accumulation and Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was significantly higher in water-stressed than in well-watered seedlings. The MDA and H2O2 were significantly higher (11.11- and 64.34%, respectively) in water-stressed compared to well-watered seedlings (Figure 5A,B). However, P fertilization significantly reduced the concentration of MDA and H2O2 in well-watered (35.50% and 34.78%, respectively) and water-stressed (48.81- and 28.45%, respectively) seedlings, compared to their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 5A,B).

2.5. Changes in Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes

Water stress significantly increased the activities of POD (118.61%) and CAT (15.12%), compared to a well-watered regime, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 6A–C). P fertilization had no significant effects on SOD under both water regimes and POD under water-stressed conditions. P fertilization significantly reduced POD (43.93%) in well-watered and CAT in well-watered and water-stressed seedlings (25.75% and 33.89%, respectively), compared to unfertilized seedlings (Figure 6B,C).

2.6. Changes in Enzymatic Activities of Nitrate Assimilation

Water stress significantly decreased the NO3 (25.74%) concentration compared to well-watered conditions. In contrast, NH4+ significantly increased under water-stressed conditions, regardless of P fertilization. Further, P fertilization had no significant effect on NO3 and NH4+ under well-watered conditions. Under water-stressed conditions, P fertilization significantly enhanced the NO3(22.05%) but reduced the NH4+ (21.56%) concentration (Figure 7A,B), compared with their unfertilized counterparts. Further, waterstress significantly reduced nitrate reductase (NR) activity (66.46%) compared to well-watered conditions. P fertilization significantly increased NR activity in water-stressed conditions (55.08%). Still, it caused no significant increase under well-watered conditions, compared with their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 7C). Water stress had no significant effect on GS and GOGAT activities, regardless of P fertilization, as compared to well-watered conditions. However, P fertilization significantly increased GS activity in well-watered seedlings by 32.02%, compared with their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 7D). Further, P fertilization had no significant effect on GS activity under water-stressed and GOGAT activity under both water levels, compared with their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 7E).

2.7. Changes in Mineral Nutrients

Waterstress significantly altered the concentration of mineral nutrients. N, P, K, and Mg concentrations significantly reduced (8.30-, 12.87-, 48.71-, and 47.53%, respectively) in water-stressed seedlings, compared to well-watered, regardless of P fertilization (Figure 8A–D). In both well-watered and water-stressed conditions, P fertilization significantly increased the concentrations of N (4.225% and 5%, respectively) and P (41.77% and 21.53%, respectively), compared to their unfertilized counterparts (Figure 8A,B). Contrarily, P fertilization did not cause significant changes in K and Mg concentrations, compared with their unfertilized counterparts, regardless of water availability (Figure 8C,D).

2.8. Relationship between the Studied Parameters

The correlation analysis revealed a strongnegative correlation of proline, H2O2, SS, SS/ST, NSCs, POD, and NH4+ with assimilative shoots RWC, ABGB (above-groundbiomass), BGB (below-groundbiomass), PH (plantheight), Chl-a and Chl-b, and SP (soluble protein) (Figure 9). The NR, GS, and GOGAT exhibited a strongpositive correlation with assimilative shoots RWC, ABGB, BGB, PH, Chl-a and Chl-b, SP, and ST (starch). At the same time, theirnegative correlation was observedwithproline, SS (solublesugar), SS/ST, NSCs, MDA, H2O2, SOD, POD, CAT, and NH4+ (Figure 9).

2.9. Results Summary

We observed a positive interaction between water and P supply on the most studied variables related to plant fitness (below-ground biomass, height, chlorophyll, and NH4+ content) and storing (starch) resources (Table S1). In contrast, we observed a negative interaction between water and P supply in the most studied variables related to stress avoidance (CAT, POD, soluble sugars, proline) and H2O2 production (Table S1). Thus, the interaction analyses strongly suggest that a positive synergy enhances growth capacity and resource production when water and phosphorus are enhanced. Contrarily, when both resources are supplied together, there exists a synergy decreasing plant stress.

3. Discussion

Our findings demonstrated that C. mongolicum was adversely affected by drought in terms of reduced assimilative shoots RWC, shoot and root biomass, chlorophyll pigments, mineral nutrition, N metabolism, and ROS and MDA concentrations. However, P fertilization contributed positively to the growth and metabolism of C. mongolicum, which indicates that it requires high levels of P during the seeding stage of its growth.

3.1. P Fertilization Improvedthe Growth and Biomass of Young Seedlings

Our study found that plant height and above- and below-ground biomass was significantly decreased in water-stressed compared to well-watered seedlings, suggesting that C. mongolicum is highly sensitive to soil water shortages. When the soil available-P concentration cannot meet the demands of plant growth, plants can respond to the P deficiency by reducing biomass accumulation [27]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies on different plant species [9,20,28,29].
However, P fertilization resulted in a significant increase in the height and biomass under well-watered conditions, suggesting that C. mongolicum has high P demands and that the soil in the hyper-arid desert lacks enough P to meet the plant’s functional requirements [30]. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting increased growth rates and biomass accumulation in plants fertilized with P under moist soil conditions [9,20,31]. However, P application had no significant impact on plant height and above-ground biomass under water-stressed conditions. In contrast, P fertilization significantly increased assimilative shoots RWC and below-ground biomass; however, the percentage increase was lower than the effect of P fertilization under well-watered conditions (9.86 < 12.19% and 11.68 < 17.22%, respectively). This scenario indicates that P mobility strongly decreases in water deficit conditions [32]. Previous studies exhibited that fertilization on plant growth gradually decreases with decreases in soil moisture and even disappears completely under extremely dry conditions [33].
Further, we observed that P fertilization resulted in an increased root-shoot ratio of water-stressed seedlings compared to well-watered seedlings. Higher root biomass contributes to drought tolerance by increasing the roots’ ability to extract soil moisture [34,35]. We suggest that P fertilization enhances the growth and root biomass of young water-stressed C. mongolicum, thereby increasing the shrub’s drought tolerance in a hyper-arid, P-deficient soil condition. In hyperarid desert conditions, xerophytes require a large root system to quickly exploit groundwater resources, reduce the risk of water and nutrient deficiencies, and ensure their survival [36].

3.2. Improved Assimilative Shoots Relative Water Content (RWC)

The relative water content (RWC) of leaves reflects the balance between the water supply to the leaves and the transpiration rate. Therefore, it is considered an important indication of the water status of plants [37]. In our study, assimilative shoots RWC significantly decreased under water-stressedconditions compared with the well-watered condition. A reduction in leaf RWC under water-stressed conditions has also been observed in various plant species [9,17,18,38], including C. mongolicum [25]. P addition has been shown to increase plants’ leaf relative water content (LRWC) in water-stressed plants [39,40]. Likewise, our study exhibits that P fertilization significantly increased the assimilative shoots RWC of C. mongolicum, regardless of water availability. We speculate that the P application may have allowed C. mongolicum to accumulate more osmolytes, compared to unfertilized plants [9]. The higher concentrations of osmolytes could have altered the osmotic potential and facilitated water movement in the assimilative shoots. In previous studies, increased plant RWC has been attributed to either the improvement in the root’s ability to absorb water or nutrients or an improved ability of the plant’s tissues to conserve water [17,40].

3.3. P Fertilization Improved Photosynthetic Chlorophyll Pigments

In our study, photosynthetic pigment concentrations (Chla and Chlb) were significantly lower in water-stressed than well-watered seedlings, regardless of the P application. This scenario indicates that oxidative stress damages photosynthetic pigments in water-stressed seedlings. Previous studies demonstrated that Chla and Chlb are sensitive to soil water shortage [9,17,31,38] and reported that drought stress could damage photosynthetic pigments. A previous study [41] demonstrated that soil dehydration damages the lamellae vesiculation and chloroplast membranes, which results in decreased chlorophyll concentration. Therefore, we suggest that a water deficit condition had caused the degradation of photosynthetic pigments, leading to the diminished photosynthetic capacity and growth of C. mongolicum seedlings.
P fertilization significantly increased the concentrations of chlorophyll pigments in C. mongolicum under both water regimes. Previous studies reported that P fertilization increases photosynthetic pigment synthesis in plants during drought, corroborating our findings [9,38]. In water-stressed plants, improved photosynthetic pigments have been shown to increase light harvestingefficiency, thus resulting in a higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn) [9]. In contrast, someother P fertilization studies reported a negligibleimprovementin chlorophyll concentrations of water-stressed plants due to variations in experimental duration, levels and durations of water deficits, and the drought tolerance ability of a particular plant species [42,43]. Although, our results are consistent with previous studies, which also suggest that the application of P improves photosynthetic pigment synthesis in water-stressed plants [19,20,38].

3.4. P Fertilization Increased Soluble Protein, and Carbohydrate Concentrations

We found that the soluble protein concentration was lower in water-stressed than in well-watered seedlings. Some potential explanations for this result include an increase in protease enzyme activity, increased proteolysis, or reduced protein synthesis, along with a lower photosynthetic rate (i.e., less carbon to build metabolites), in water-stressed plants. Water stress significantly increased the proline concentration compared to well-watered conditions. A high proline accumulation may reflect osmotic adjustments under drought stress and aid in ROS detoxification, contributing to membrane and macromolecule protection [44]. It has been reported that proline accumulates under low moisture conditions due to a reciprocal mechanism involving the activation of enzymes required for its synthesis and the suppression of enzymes required for its degradation [45]. Nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs), such as soluble sugars and starches, are the products of plant photosynthesis. NSCs indicate the amount of substance needed for plant survival, growth, and buffering capacity under adverse environmental conditions [46] and therefore play a critical role in regulating plant physiological phenomena in response to stress conditions. In our study, NSCs concentrations in assimilative shoots varied significantly in response to water and P fertilization, which could be attributed to the physiological mechanisms and the changes in the NSC components. We observed a lower starch concentration and higher concentrations of soluble sugar, NSCs, and soluble sugar/starch ratios in water-stressed seedlings than in well-watered seedlings, irrespective of P treatment. Drought stress causes stomatal closure and retrains photosynthetic C gain, forcing the plants to use starch reserves for metabolic requirements [8,47]. Likewise, our study demonstrated that water-stressed C. mongolicum maintained a high ratio of soluble sugar to starch in assimilative shoots, regardless of P application. Therefore, water-induced increases in soluble sugar and reductions in starch within the assimilation shoots of C. mongolicum may be explained by converting stored starch into soluble sugars [48] for osmotic purposes adjustment. These results are not surprising, since plants in hyper-arid desert conditions (water deficit) require more soluble sugars for metabolism, since water deficit inhibits the important process of photosynthesis and reduces CO2 assimilation but does not substantially reduce respiration rates [49]. A sufficient concentration of soluble sugars is essential for osmotic adjustment for optimal phloem turgor to maintain phloem transport and refill xylem embolism when there is a water shortage [50].
P fertilization has been reported to play a critical role in regulating carbohydrate concentrations under drought stress conditions by altering the activity of correlative enzymes in carbohydrate metabolism [18,51]. In our study, soluble sugar levels were significantly higher in P-fertilized seedlings than in non-fertilized seedlings, which is consistent with previous findings [9,38].

3.5. P Fertilization Reduced Lipid Peroxidation, ROS Production, and Antioxidant System

Drought stress often induces the formation of ROS, including anion radicals (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which react with lipids, proteins, and DNA and lead to oxidative damage and the disrupting of normal cell function and a serious reduction in plant growth [52,53]. In our study, there was a significant increase in H2O2 concentrations in water-stressed seedlings, regardless of P fertilization, which may reflect a decrease in photosynthetic rate and other physiological changes occurring due to drought stress, seemingly corroborated by correlation analysis (Figure 9). The elevated ROS production resulted in significant membrane lipid peroxidation damage, as demonstrated by the significantly increased MDA concentration in the water-stressed C. mongolicum seedlings compared to the well-watered seedlings. Excessive ROS also damage protein structures and inactivate enzymes that function in various physiological processes [54].
Plant antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, POD, and CAT, are essential in maintaining a dynamic equilibrium by scavenging excess ROS. The antioxidant enzyme activity of plants can be correlated directly with the ability of the plant to scavenge ROS (Figure 9). Our study showed that water-stressed seedlings had significantly higher enzyme activities (SOD, POD, and CAT) than well-watered seedlings, regardless of P fertilization. Similar results were also reported in other studies conducted on various plant species [9,55].
P fertilization did not change SOD activity under both water regimes and significantly decreased POD activity under water-stressed conditions, whereas CAT was significantly reduced in both water regimes, compared to non-fertilized seedlings. We suggest that C. mongolicum significantly increase POD and CAT activities to scavenge ROS in response to water stress. In contrast, applying P helps to prevent ROS-induced damage, as demonstrated by reduced MDA and improvements in other physiological functions.

3.6. P Fertilization Increased N-Metabolism by Increasing Its Assimilative Enzymes

Plants readily absorb and utilize two forms of soil N (NO3 and NH4+) in their growth. Drought stress has been associated with changes in the metabolism of N by altering the activity of N metabolic enzymes in previous studies [56,57]. Changing enzyme activity can significantly affect the efficiency of N uptake and utilization. In our study, water stress significantly declined NO3 concentration, compared to well-watered conditions. NO3 promotes plant growth, osmotic regulation, and assists plants in adapting to abiotic stress conditions [58]. It is also crucial for stomatal closure by affecting the depolarization of guard cells [59].
Nitrate reductase (NR) activity was more significantly reduced in water-stressed conditionsthan in well-watered conditions. The reduction in NR might be attributed to a reduction in leaf photosynthesis, resulting from stomatal closure, which inhibits growth. A previous study [60] reported significant reductions in the activity of NR and NiR enzymes and the expression levels of GmNR and GmNiR in soybean leaves leading to impaired nitrogen assimilation. Several studies have claimed that drought stress decreases NR activity [61,62,63]. Decreasing NR activity may have some advantages for plants since it contributes rapidly to maintaining osmotic pressure in photosynthetic cells through an increase in the NO3 concentration.
NH4+ is assimilated by glutamine synthase (GS) and glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GOGAT). The GS/GOGAT metabolism cycle is inhibited by drought stress, which weakens NH4+ assimilation, causing cell death and toxicity [58,60]. In our study, NH4+ significantly increased under water-stressed, compared to well-watered conditions, regardless of P fertilization. Further, water stress did not significantly affect GS/GOGAT metabolism in our study (Figure 7D,E), indicating that C. mongolicum seedlings accelerated NH4+ to withstand drought stress. A recent study demonstrated that GS activity remained unchanged in S. japonica seedlings under drought stress, while GOGAT activity increased in both roots and leaves [62]. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that P application can adaptively regulate N metabolism under water stress by modulating the activity of its associated enzymes [18,57,63]. We observed that P fertilization increased the NR activity under drought stress, whereas there was no significant effect on NR under well-watered and GS/GOGAT activities under both stress conditions, compared with their unfertilized counterparts.
NH4+ is not only a vital component of living cells, but also an essential intermediate in plant metabolism. However, it can adversely affect the metabolism of higher plants when present in excess [64]. In our study P fertilization significantly reduced NH4+ in water-stressed conditions (Figure 7B), compared with their unfertilized counterparts. Therefore, we suggest that P fertilization might have decreased or prevented toxic effects associated with the excessive NH4+ accumulation under water stress [18]. A previous study [18] reported that glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity under P-fertilized water-stressed seedlings was higher than in well-watered conditions. We propose that P fertilization under waterstress might have increased the GDH activity, which had accompanied the GS/GOGAT cycle within C. mongolicum, for detoxifying excess NH4+.

3.7. P Fertilization Improved Mineral Nutrients

We observed significant reductions in the concentration of assimilating shoot N, P, K, and Mg in water-stressed seedlings, compared to well-watered. Water availability plays a key role in nutrient uptake and assimilation, and several studies demonstrated that decreased soil moisture reduces mineral nutrient uptake and concentrations [28,65], which corroborates our findings. Compared to their unfertilized counterparts, P fertilization resulted in significant increases in the assimilation of shoot N and P, while it did not significantly affect the concentrations of K and Mg. Previous studies reported that P fertilization increases plant N and P concentrations [66,67]. Both N and P contribute to the process of photosynthesis, cell growth and metabolism, and protein synthesis [68]. Hence, we suggest that a P-fertilization-induced increase in shoot N and P concentrations might have improved photosynthesis and protein synthesis, resulting in the improved growth of C. mongolicum, compared with their unfertilized counterparts.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experiment Design

The present study was conducted between June and early October 2021 in an outdoor nursery at the Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem (37°00′56″ N, 80°43′81″ E), Chinese Academy of Sciences, located at the southern edge of the Taklamakan Desert, Northwest China. This region is extremely hyper-arid, with a mean yearly temperature and precipitation of 11.9 °C and 35 mm, respectively. At least eight seeds collected from the natural desert were sown in each 25 L pot (ca. 18%), filled with 20 kg of homogenized soil (aeolian loamy sand with organic C, 2.99 g kg−1; total N, 0.23 g kg−1; total P, 0.60 g kg−1 and total K, 23.11 g kg−1). The pots were arranged in a complete randomized design (RCD) and watered regularly.

4.2. Treatments Application

Following the seedlings’ establishment under regular management for one month, they were thinned to one healthy and uniform seedling per pot and exposed to four treatments for three months: two levels of water treatments (well-watered [control 70–75% field capacity] and water-stressed [severe drought 25–30% field capacity]) and two rates of P fertilization (+P and −P). There were 12 replications of each treatment. We calculated the soil relative water content (SRWC) for the two water treatments using a weighted method [9]. We applied sodium di-hydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4, 25.5% P) as a P fertilizer, with the dose consisting of 390 mg P mixed in 400 mL of water per pot. Five rounds of fertilization were carried outafter every 20 days. Besides, Pots were rotated once a week throughout the experiment to avoid the possibility of systematic errors associated with variations in environmental conditions. At the end of the experiment, all of the plants were harvested. Shoot samples are immediately put in Ziploc bags and stored at −80 °C for physio-biochemical determination in the laboratory.

4.3. Growth Parameters

4.3.1. Determination of Assimilative Shoot Relative Water Content

A single sample of assimilative shoots from each plant was collected, and their fresh weight (FW) was determined. We immediately dipped the samples into distilled water at a temperature of 4 °C for 4 h in the dark to measure the turgid weight (TW). To determine the dry weight (DW), the samples were placed in a 75 °C oven for 24 h. The assimilative shoot relative water content (LRWC) was calculated by using the following equation:
Assimilative shoot RWC = [(FW − DW)∕(TW − DW)] × 100%

4.3.2. Measurement of Plant Growth and Biomass

The plant height (cm) was measured using a measuring tape. The above- and below-ground plant parts were separated and weighed after being removed from the soil. We calculated R/S (root-shoot) ratios by dividing the biomass of the plants’ above- and below-ground parts by the ratio of their dry weights.

4.4. Physio-Biochemical Analysis

4.4.1. Measurement of Photosynthetic Pigments

Fresh assimilating shoots were immersed in 95% ethanol (v/v) to extract the photosynthetic chlorophyll pigments. We determined the amount of chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) by reading the absorbance at 665 nm and 649 nm, respectively [13], using a spectrophotometer (Type UV-754; Shanghai Accurate Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The chlorophyll concentrations were determined using the following equations (mg g−1 FM).
Chla = 13.98 A665 − 6.88 A649
Chlb = 24.96 A649 − 7.32 A665
Chla/b = Chl a/Chlb
Chl = Chla + Chlb

4.4.2. Determination of Nonstructural Carbohydrates

Dried shoot samples were ground into a fine powder using a ball mill. The colorimetric determination of the soluble sugar concentration was determined using glucose, following a standard method [69]. Starch was measured calorimetrically at 620 nm, with a slight modification in the anthrone method [70]. The NSC represented the sum of soluble sugars and starch contents.

4.4.3. Determination of Soluble Protein and Proline

The proline extraction (0.2 g fresh assimilative shoot) was conducted using two mL of 10% acetic acid and five mL of 3% salicylic acid, respectively. The resulting supernatants were analyzed according to a standard method [61]. Approximately 0.3 g of fresh assimilative shoots were used to determine the concentration of soluble proteins using bovine serum albumin as the standard [71].

4.4.4. Oxidative Stress Indicators

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations were determined by a standard procedure [72]. The 0.2 g freshly assimilative shoots were homogenized in 5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%) in an ice bath, transferred to tubes, and centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min (4 °C). Next, we centrifuged the supernatant comprising of 0.1 mL of titanium reagent (50 µL of 20% titanium tetrachloride) and 0.2 mL of ammonia, centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. Following five washes with acetone, the precipitate was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min, after which 3 mL of 1 M H2SO4 was added. The absorbance was read at 410 nm using a spectrophotometer (Type UV-754; Shanghai Accurate Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China).
The malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration was assessed based on the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test for the evaluation of lipid peroxidation [73]. Fresh assimilative shoot samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in 1 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged for 10 min at 5000× g (4°C). Using a separate tube, 4 mL of the supernatant was added to 2 mL of 20% TCA (containing 0.5% TBA), and the mixture was heated at 100 °C for 15 min before centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min. Using a spectrophotometer, OD450, OD532, and OD600 nm were determined, and the concentration of MDA was calculated according to the following equation:
MDA (mol g−1 FW) = 6.45 (OD532 − OD600) − 0.56OD450.

4.4.5. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Approximately 0.5 g of fresh assimilative shoot samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and 10 mL of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 0.5 mmol EDTA and 0.15 mol NaCl to determine enzyme activity. After centrifuging the homogenate at 12,000× g at 4 °C (20 min), the supernatant was used to measure the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD).
We measured the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) following a standard method [74]. A reaction mixture of 3 mL was prepared using 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 75 mM of nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT), 130 mM of methionine, and 2.0 mM of riboflavin, and 0.1 mL of enzyme extract. We assessed the activity of SOD by reading the absorbance at 560 nm using a spectrophotometer (Type UV-754; Shanghai Accurate Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required for the 50% inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction.
Peroxidase activity (POD) was determined using a standard method [75] with slight modifications. A reaction mixture of 3 mL was prepared by mixing phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 3 mmol peroxide L−1, and 0.25% (v/v) of guaiacol with the enzyme extract. Using a spectrophotometer (Type UV-754; Shanghai Accurate Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China), absorbance (470 nm) was read at 1-min intervals for 3 min. The enzyme activity was expressed as U/g·min−1.
The Catalase (CAT) activity was evaluated following a previous method [76] with minor modifications. In brief, a 3 mL reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 0.1 mL of the enzyme extract with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 10 mM hydrogen peroxide. We used a spectrophotometer (Type UV-754; Shanghai Accurate Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China), to measure the change in OD240 at 1-min intervals for 3 min. The calculation of CAT activity was carried out using the 39.4 mM−1·cm−1 extinction coefficient. The enzyme activity was expressed as U/g·min−1.

4.4.6. Determination of N-Metabolizing Enzymes

The nitrate reductase (NR) activity was determined by homogenizing 0.2 g using 2 mL of 25 mM phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 8.7), which contained 10 mM cysteine and 1 mM EDTA, and then centrifuging for 20 min at 30,000× g. The resulting supernatant was tested for NR activity using a diazo-coupling method employing the Griess reagent [13].
The GS activity was determined by homogenizing them in 2 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.8; containing 15% glycerol, 0.1% TritonX-100, 1 mM of EDTA, and 14 mM of 2-mercaptoethanol) and centrifuging them twice at 4 °C for 10 min. After complexing with acidified ferric chloride, the supernatant was used to determine GS by forming glutamine hydroxamate using a 540 nm fluorescence measurement [13].

4.4.7. Determination of Mineral Elements

We measured the concentrations of mineral nutrients in finely powdered, assimilative shoot samples. The concentration of N and P was determined following digestion with concentrated H2SO4 using a Kjeldahl Nitrogen Analyzer (K1160, Jinan Hanon Instruments Co. Ltd., Jinan, China) and a Thermo-Elemental inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (iCAP 6300). Assimilative shoot samples were soaked in HNO3and HF–HNO H2O2, respectively, and then the concentrations of K and Mg were determined [77].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Measurements were replicated three times and sorted using Microsoft Excel 2019. SPSS version 16.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform descriptive statistics two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) considering water availability and P application as main factors, with two levels for each. Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to compare means at a significance level of 0.05. GraphPad Prism 8 was used to create the figure graphics. For interpretation purposes, Pearson correlation analyses were conducted using OriginPro 2019 software (OriginLabCarporation Northampton, Northampton, MA, USA) regarding the growth parameters, chlorophyll pigment concentrations in the shoots, N metabolism, osmolytes accumulation, mineral nutrition, and reactive oxygen species production rate, as well as antioxidant enzymatic activities.

5. Conclusions

Drought adversely affected the growth and metabolism of C. mongolicum, as evidenced by a reduction in assimilative shoots RWC, shoot-root biomass, photosynthetic pigments, mineral nutrition, N metabolism, and an increase in the concentration of ROS and lipid peroxidation. Even so, the improved root-shoot ratio, osmotic solutes (soluble sugar, proline), and upregulation of antioxidant enzymes (CAT and POD) suggest that C. mongolicum drought tolerance strategies for maximizing water absorption and reducing oxidative damage are effective. In addition, P fertilization positively affected the growth and metabolism of C. mongolicum, which indicates its high P needs at the young seedling stage of development. In drought-stressed seedlings, P fertilization increased the seedling’s productivity by increasing assimilative shoots RWC, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes, mineral nutrition, and N assimilation. In addition, P fertilization reduced the levels of H2O2 and MDA, leading to reduced POD and CAT activities under both water levels. P fertilization also positively affected the growth and metabolism under well-watered conditions, which indicated the soil’s high P depletion in the hyper-arid desert.
Therefore, we suggest that P fertilization played a vital role in the growth and metabolism under well-watered conditions, thus helping in the maintenance of drought tolerance of C. mongolicum, largely through physiological rather than morphological adaptations. Under both water regimes, the P fertilization increased the below-ground biomass significantly, which may be helpful to young C. mongolicum plants for acquiring groundwater resources and reduce the risk of water and nutrient deficiency in the hyper-arid Taklamakan desert. The addition of water and P had synergistic positive effects on variables related to fitness and energy storing and negative effects on variables related to stress, strongly suggesting the positive impact of both factors on each other. This promising result can help improve field conditions and the management of C. mongolicum communities in the Taklamakan desert. However, further research is needed to elaborate on the underlying molecular mechanism operating under drought stress conditions to enhance the understanding of the drought-tolerance capacity of young C. mongolicum.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11223054/s1, Table S1: Two-way factorial ANOVA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.U. and F.Z.; data curation, A.U.; writing original draft—A.U.; methodology, A.U. and F.Z.; formal analysis and investigation, A.U., M.A.A., J.P., H.H.J. and M.K.; review & editing, A.T., C.G., J.S., J.P., S.U., M.A.A., Z.Z., M.K. and X.C.; funding acquisition, F.Z. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41977050, 32250410301), the Key Program of Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Government of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China (Nos. U1903102). This research was further supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (QN2022045005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the graphs provided in the manuscript and supplementary table.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to their departmental colleagues for their help and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tariq, A.; Ullah, A.; Sardans, J.; Zeng, F.; Graciano, C.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Ahmed, Z.; Ali, S.; Zhang, Z. Alhagi sparsifolia: An ideal phreatophyte for combating desertification and land degradation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 844, 157–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Spinoni, J.; Barbosa, P.; Cherlet, M.; Forzieri, G.; McCormick, N.; Naumann, G.; Vogt, J.V.; Dosio, A. How will the progressive global increase of arid areas affect population and land-use in the 21st century? Glob. Planet Change 2021, 205, 103597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yao, J.; Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Gao, Z.; Wang, G.; Li, D.; Yu, H.; Chen, X. Accelerated dryland expansion regulates future variability in dryland gross primary production. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sala, O.E.; StuartChapin, F., III; Armesto, J.J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lian, X.; Piao, S.; Chen, A.; Huntingford, C.; Fu, B.; Li, L.Z.; Huang, J.; Sheffield, J.; Berg, A.M.; Keenan, T.F.; et al. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ibáñez, J.; Martínez, J.; Schnabel, S. Desertification due to overgrazing in a dynamic commercial livestock–grass–soil system. Ecol. Modell. 2007, 205, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arndt, S.K.; Arampatsis, C.; Foetzki, A.; Li, X.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, X. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. J. Arid Environ. 2004, 59, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McDowell, N.; Pockman, W.T.; Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D.; Cobb, N.; Kolb, T.; Plaut, J.; Sperry, J.; West, A.; Williams, D.G.; et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 2008, 178, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Li, N.; Song, D.; Sun, F.; Wu, X.; Dakhil, M.A. Impact of phosphorus application on drought resistant responses of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 166, 894–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hessini, K.; Martínez, J.P.; Gandour, M.; Albouchi, A.; Soltani, A.; Abdelly, C. Effect of water stress on growth, osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and water-use efficiency in Spartina alterniflora. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, J.; Li, H.; Liu, T.; Polle, A.; Peng, C.; Luo, Z.-B. Nitrogen metabolism of two contrasting poplar species during acclimation to limiting nitrogen availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4207–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ullah, A.; Li, M.; Noor, J.; Tariq, A.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic traits, ion homeostasis and nitrogen metabolism in wild and cultivated soybean. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mahieu, S.; Germon, F.; Aveline, A.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Ambus, P.; Jensen, E.S. The influence of water stress on biomass and N accumulation, N partitioning between above and below ground parts and on N rhizodeposition during reproductive growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Soil Biol. Chem. 2009, 41, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suriyagoda, L.D.; Ryan, M.H.; Renton, M.; Lambers, H. Above-and below-ground interactions of grass and pasture legume species when grown together under drought and low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 2011, 348, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Warren, C.R. How does P affect photosynthesis and metabolite profiles of Eucalyptusglobulus? Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, Y.J.; Kuhns, L.; Lynch, J.P.; Brown, K.M. Buffered phosphorus fertilizer improves growth and drought tolerance of woody landscape plants. J. Environ. Hortic. 2002, 20, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Pan, K.; Jin, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, L. Effects of phosphorus application on photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen metabolism, water use efficiency and growth of dwarf bamboo (Fargesiarufa) subjected to water deficit. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Sun, X.; Song, D.; Chen, W.; Zhang, A. Phosphorous application improves drought tolerance of Phoebe zhennan. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Chen, W.; Song, D. Phosphorous fertilization alleviates drought effects on Alnuscremastogyne by regulating its antioxidant and osmotic potential. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Faustino, L.I.; Bulfe, N.M.L.; Pinazo, M.A.; Monteoliva, S.E.; Graciano, C. Dry weight partitioning and hydraulic traits in young Pinus taeda trees fertilized with nitrogen and phosphorus in a subtropical area. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hou, E.; Luo, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Chen, C.; Lu, X.; Jiang, L.; Luo, X.; Wen, D. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Luo, L.; Ye, H.; Zhang, D.; Gu, J.D.; Deng, O. The dynamics of phosphorus fractions and the factors driving phosphorus cycle in Zoige Plateau peatland soil. Chemosphere 2021, 278, 130501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, D.; Wang, W.; Gao, T.; Fang, X.; Gao, X.; Li, J.; Bu, H.; Mu, J. Calcium alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing antioxidant metabolism and adjusting solute accumulation in Calligonum mongolicum. Conserv. Physiol. 2017, 5, cox060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, S.; Ji, X.; Jin, B.; Zhang, J. Root distribution of three dominant desert shrubs and their water uptake dynamics. Plant Ecol. 2017, 10, 780–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Tariq, A.; Zeng, F.; Chai, X.; Graciano, C. Involvement of soluble proteins in growth and metabolic adjustments of drought-stressed Calligonum mongolicum seedlings under nitrogen addition. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bhattachan, A.; D’Odorico, P.; Dintwe, K.; Okin, G.S.; Collins, S.L. Resilience and recovery potential of duneland vegetation in the southern Kalahari. Ecosphere 2014, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jiang, M.; Caldararu, S.; Zaehle, S.; Ellsworth, D.S.; Medlyn, B.E. Towards a more physiological representation of vegetation phosphorus processes in land surface models. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Sardans, J.; Peñuelas, J. The role of plants in the effects of global change on nutrient availability and stoichiometry in the plant-soil system. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1741–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chtouki, M.; Laaziz, F.; Naciri, R.; Garré, S.; Nguyen, F.; Oukarroum, A. Interactive effect of soil moisture content and phosphorus fertilizer form on chickpea growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, B.; Gao, X.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Shareef, M.; Huang, C.; Liu, G.; Gui, D.; Zeng, F. Groundwater depth affects phosphorus but not carbon and nitrogen concentrations of a desert phreatophyte in Northwest China. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Graciano, C.; Guiamét, J.J.; Goya, J.F. Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on drought responses in Eucalyptusgrandis seedlings. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 212, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, B.; Singh, G. Influence of soil water regime on nutrient mobility and uptake by Dalbergia sissoo seedlings. Trop. Ecol. 2004, 45, 337–340. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yin, C.; Pang, X.; Chen, K.; Gong, R.; Xu, G.; Wang, X. The water adaptability of Jatropha curcas is modulated by soil nitrogen availability. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012, 47, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Razaq, M.; Zhang, P.; Shen, H. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Meng, L.S.; Yao, S.Q. Transcription co-activator Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFOLIA 3 (AN 3) regulates water-use efficiency and drought tolerance by modulating stomatal density and improving root architecture by the transrepression of YODA (YDA). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Canham, C.A.; Froend, R.H.; Stock, W.D. Rapid root elongation by phreatophyte seedlings does not imply tolerance of water table decline. Trees 2015, 29, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lugojan, C.; Ciulca, S. Evaluation of relative water content in winter wheat. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 15, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dayal, J.; Goswami, C.L.; Munjal, R. Influence of phosphorus application on water relations, biochemical parameters and gum content in cluster bean under water deficit. Biol. Plant 2004, 48, 445–448. [Google Scholar]
  39. Singh, V.; Pallaghy, C.K.; Singh, D. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: II. Water relations, free and bound water and leaf expansion rate. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 96, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sato, A.M.; Catuchi, T.A.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Souza, G.M. The use of network analysis to uncover homeostatic responses of a drought-tolerant sugarcane cultivar under severe water deficit and phosphorus supply. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 1145–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Anjum, S.A.; Wang, L.C.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Xue, L.L.; Zou, C.M. Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2011, 197, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Campbell, C.D.; Sage, R.F. Interactions between the effects of atmospheric CO2 content and P nutrition on photosynthesis in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Singh, S.K.; Badgujar, G.; Reddy, V.R.; Fleisher, D.H.; Bunce, J.A. Carbon dioxide diffusion across stomata and mesophyll and photo-biochemical processes as affected by growth CO2 and phosphorus nutrition in cotton. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Keunen, E.L.S.; Peshev, D.; Vangronsveld, J.; Van Den Ende, W.I.M.; Cuypers, A.N.N. Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: Extending the traditional concept. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1242–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Peng, Z.; Lu, Q.; Verma, D.P.S. Reciprocal regulation of Δ 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and proline dehydrogenase genes controls proline levels during and after osmotic stress in plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996, 253, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Myers, J.A.; Kitajima, K. Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McDowell, N.G. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. He, W.; Liu, H.; Qi, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhu, X. Patterns in nonstructural carbohydrate contents at the tree organ level in response to drought duration. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 3627–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sala, A.; Piper, F.; Hoch, G. Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol. 2010, 186, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Klein, R.A.; Ratliff, K.A.; Vianello, M.; Adams, R.B., Jr.; Bahník, Š.; Bernstein, M.J.; Bocian, K.; Brandt, M.J.; Brooks, B.; Brumbaugh, C.C. Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 45, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rao, I.M.; Terry, N. Leaf phosphate status, photosynthesis, and carbon partitioning in sugar beet (IV. Changes with time following increased supply of phosphate to low-phosphate plants). Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Foyer, C.H.; Fletcher, J.M. Plant antioxidants: Colour me healthy. Biologist 2001, 48, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sairam, R.K.; Rao, K.V.; Srivastava, G.C. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Murshed, R.; Lopez-Lauri, F.; Sallanon, H. Effect of water stress on antioxidant systems and oxidative parameters in fruits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L, cv. Micro-tom). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2013, 19, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zahoor, R.; Zhao, W.; Abid, M.; Dong, H.; Zhou, Z. Potassium application regulates nitrogen metabolism and osmotic adjustment in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) functional leaf under drought stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 215, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhong, C.; Bai, Z.G.; Zhu, L.F.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhu, C.Q.; Huang, J.L.; Jin, Q.Y.; Cao, X.C. Nitrogen-mediated alleviation of photosynthetic inhibition under moderate water deficit stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 157, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cao, X.; Zhong, C.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.; Jin, Q. Ammonium uptake and metabolism alleviate PEG-induced water stress in rice seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Obidiegwu, J.E.; Bryan, G.J.; Jones, H.G.; Prashar, A. Coping with drought: Stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, L.; Yao, X.; Xie, F. Effect of drought stress at reproductive stages on growth and nitrogen metabolism in soybean. Agronomy 2020, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Tariq, A.; Zeng, F.; Graciano, C.; Zhang, B. Nitrogen application mitigates drought-induced metabolic changes in Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings by regulating nutrient and biomass allocation patterns. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tian, J.; Pang, Y.; Zhao, Z. Drought, salinity, and low nitrogen differentially affect the growth and nitrogen metabolism of Sophora japonica (L.) in a semi-hydroponic phenotyping platform. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 715456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xia, H.; Xu, T.; Zhang, J.; Shen, K.; Li, Z.; Liu, J. Drought-induced responses of nitrogen metabolism in Ipomoea batatas. Plants 2020, 9, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, L.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Lin, L.; Zeng, F.; Gui, D.; Lu, Y. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) resorption of two dominant alpine perennial grass species in response to contrasting N and P availability. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 127, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Schwarz, D.; Franken, P.; Colla, G. Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and assimilation in vegetable crops. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 171–195. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang, H. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on leaf nutrient characteristics in a subtropical forest. Trees 2018, 32, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Yue, Z.; Zeng, F.; Li, X.; Li, L. Effects of short-term nitrogen and phosphorus addition on leaf stoichiometry of a dominant alpine grass. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chapin, F.S.; Matson, P.A.; Vitousek, P.M. Plant carbon budgets. In Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 157–181. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yemm, E.W.; Willis, A. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 1954, 57, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hansen, J.; Møller, I.B. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Anal. Biochem. 1975, 68, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Patterson, B.D.; MacRae, E.A.; Ferguson, I.B. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Anal. Biochem. 1984, 139, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Effect of light on lipid peroxidation in chloroplasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1965, 19, 716–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Giannospolitis, C.N.; Ries, S.K. Superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang, J.; Zhong, X.M.; Lv, X.L.; Shi, Z.S.; Li, F.H. Photosynthesis and physiology responses of paired near-isogenic lines in waxy maize (Zea mays L.) to nicosulfuron. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 1059–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yordanova, R.Y.; Christov, K.N.; Popova, L.P. Antioxidative enzymes in barley plants subjected to soil flooding. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004, 51, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, Z.; Chai, X.; Tariq, A.; Zeng, F.; Graciano, C.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Ullah, A. Coordinated Patterns in the Allocation, Composition, and Variability of Multiple Elements among Organs of Two Desert Shrubs under Nitrogen Addition and Drought. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 22, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Changesin (A) assimilative shoots RWC, (B) plant height, (C) above-ground biomass, (D) below-ground biomass, and (E) root-shoot ratio inresponse to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 1. Changesin (A) assimilative shoots RWC, (B) plant height, (C) above-ground biomass, (D) below-ground biomass, and (E) root-shoot ratio inresponse to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g001
Figure 2. Changes in concentrations of (A) chlorophyll a, (B) chlorophyll b and (C) chlorophyll a/b ratio in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. * and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 2. Changes in concentrations of (A) chlorophyll a, (B) chlorophyll b and (C) chlorophyll a/b ratio in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. * and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g002
Figure 3. Changes inconcentrations of (A) soluble sugar, (B) starch, (C) soluble sugar/starch ratio, and (D) nonstructural carbohydrates in response to P supplementation under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. * and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 3. Changes inconcentrations of (A) soluble sugar, (B) starch, (C) soluble sugar/starch ratio, and (D) nonstructural carbohydrates in response to P supplementation under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. * and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g003
Figure 4. Changes inconcentrations of (A) soluble protein and (B) proline in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 4. Changes inconcentrations of (A) soluble protein and (B) proline in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g004
Figure 5. Changes in concentrations of (A) MDA and (B) H2O2 in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 5. Changes in concentrations of (A) MDA and (B) H2O2 in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g005
Figure 6. Changes in the activity of (A) SOD, (B) POD, and (C) CAT in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 6. Changes in the activity of (A) SOD, (B) POD, and (C) CAT in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g006
Figure 7. Changes in concentrations of (A) NO3 and (B) NH4+, and enzymatic activity of (C) NR (D) GS, and (E) GOGAT in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 7. Changes in concentrations of (A) NO3 and (B) NH4+, and enzymatic activity of (C) NR (D) GS, and (E) GOGAT in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g007
Figure 8. Changes in the concentrations of (A) TN, (B) TP, (C) K, and (D) Mg in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 8. Changes in the concentrations of (A) TN, (B) TP, (C) K, and (D) Mg in response to P supplementation, under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. A different letter following the means indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) between the four treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test. Bars represent means ± SD. An overview of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effect of water (W) and phosphorus (P) treatments is presented in the right-hand corner of each panel. *, ** and *** indicate that F values were significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Plants 11 03054 g008
Figure 9. Pearson correlation analysis between study parameters. Assimilative shoots RWC (relative water content), ABGB (above-ground biomass), BGB (below-ground biomass), PH (plant height), RSR (root-shoot ratio), Chl−a (chlorophyll a), Chl−b chlorophyll b, Chla/b (chlorophyll a/b ratio), SP (soluble protein), proline SS (soluble sugar), ST (starch), SS/ST (soluble sugar/starch ratio), NSCs (nonstructural carbohydrates), TP (Total P), TN (total N), K (potassium), Mg (magnesium), MDA (malondialdehyde), H2O2, (hydrogen peroxide), SOD (superoxide dismutase),CAT (catalase), POD (peroxidase), NO3 (nitrate), NH4+ (ammonium), NR (nitrate reductase), GS (glutamine synthetase), GOGAT (glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase). * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 9. Pearson correlation analysis between study parameters. Assimilative shoots RWC (relative water content), ABGB (above-ground biomass), BGB (below-ground biomass), PH (plant height), RSR (root-shoot ratio), Chl−a (chlorophyll a), Chl−b chlorophyll b, Chla/b (chlorophyll a/b ratio), SP (soluble protein), proline SS (soluble sugar), ST (starch), SS/ST (soluble sugar/starch ratio), NSCs (nonstructural carbohydrates), TP (Total P), TN (total N), K (potassium), Mg (magnesium), MDA (malondialdehyde), H2O2, (hydrogen peroxide), SOD (superoxide dismutase),CAT (catalase), POD (peroxidase), NO3 (nitrate), NH4+ (ammonium), NR (nitrate reductase), GS (glutamine synthetase), GOGAT (glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase). * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Plants 11 03054 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ullah, A.; Tariq, A.; Zeng, F.; Sardans, J.; Graciano, C.; Ullah, S.; Chai, X.; Zhang, Z.; Keyimu, M.; Asghar, M.A.; et al. Phosphorous Supplementation Alleviates Drought-Induced Physio-Biochemical Damages in Calligonum mongolicum. Plants 2022, 11, 3054. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223054

AMA Style

Ullah A, Tariq A, Zeng F, Sardans J, Graciano C, Ullah S, Chai X, Zhang Z, Keyimu M, Asghar MA, et al. Phosphorous Supplementation Alleviates Drought-Induced Physio-Biochemical Damages in Calligonum mongolicum. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3054. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ullah, Abd, Akash Tariq, Fanjiang Zeng, Jordi Sardans, Corina Graciano, Sami Ullah, Xutian Chai, Zhihao Zhang, Maierdang Keyimu, Muhammad Ahsan Asghar, and et al. 2022. "Phosphorous Supplementation Alleviates Drought-Induced Physio-Biochemical Damages in Calligonum mongolicum" Plants 11, no. 22: 3054. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223054

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop