Next Article in Journal
The Modulatory Effects of Non-Thermal Plasma on Seed’s Morphology, Germination and Genetics—A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Convergence between Development and Stress: Ectopic Xylem Formation in Arabidopsis Hypocotyl in Response to 24-Epibrassinolide and Cadmium
Previous Article in Journal
The ABCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE (ABI) 4 Transcription Factor Is Stabilized by Stress, ABA and Phosphorylation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Road to Practical Application of Cadmium Phytoremediation Using Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/plants11162178
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

QTL Pyramiding and Its Use in Breeding for Increasing the Phytoextraction Efficiency of Soil Cd via High-Cd-Accumulating Rice

by
Tadashi Abe
1,
Masashi Ito
2,
Ryuichi Takahashi
2,
Toshimitsu Honma
3,
Masato Kuramata
1 and
Satoru Ishikawa
1,*
1
Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan
2
Akita Prefectural Agricultural Experiment Station, Akita 010-1231, Japan
3
Niigata Agricultural Research Institute, Nagaoka 940-0826, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2178; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162178
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 16 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 22 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insight into Cadmium Phytoremediation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phytoextraction by high-Cd-accumulating rice lacking a functional OsHMA3 allele is promising for Cd removal from paddy soils. To increase rice Cd extraction efficiency, we developed a new high-Cd variety, TJN25-11. For this, we pyramided a nonfunctional OsHMA3 allele from a high-Cd variety, Jarjan, and two QTLs for increased shoot Cd concentrations, which were discovered in a mapping population derived from a high-Cd variety, Nepal 555, and a low-Cd variety, Tachisugata. In two Cd-contaminated paddy fields under drained aerobic soil conditions, TJN25-11 presented significantly higher Cd concentrations in the straw and panicles than the OsHMA3-deficient varieties TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. Among the varieties, TJN25-11 had a relatively high shoot biomass, resulting in the highest Cd accumulation in the shoots. The soil Cd decreased by approximately 20% after TJN25-11 growth. The amount of Cd that accumulated in the TJN25-11 aerial parts was much greater than the amount of Cd that decreased in the topsoil, suggesting that Cd was absorbed from deeper soil layers. Thus, we revealed the effects of QTL pyramiding on shoot Cd accumulation and Cd phytoextraction efficiency. Since TJN25-11 has favorable agronomic traits for compatibility with Japanese cultivation systems, this variety could be useful for Cd phytoextraction in Cd-contaminated paddy fields.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is a ubiquitous element on Earth. Additionally, arable lands contain a small amount of Cd, and crop plants absorb Cd from the soil and accumulate it in their edible parts. Chronic intake of Cd by humans through foods can cause health problems such as renal dysfunction [1]. Therefore, the Codex Alimentarius Commission of the FAO/WHO has set standard values of Cd for various foods to protect our health [2].
Techniques for suppressing Cd uptake by crop plants from the soil have been extensively studied [3,4]. Phytoremediation is an attractive technique for reducing Cd risk in crop plants; in this technique, high-Cd-accumulating (henceforth, high-Cd) plants are used to extract Cd from soils with low-to-moderate levels of Cd contamination [5,6]. The advantages of this method include its cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness [7]. However, phytoextraction is difficult, as soils contain more Cd than plants can absorb, and Cd-hyperaccumulating plants are needed to increase phytoextraction efficiency [6]. We previously demonstrated that high-Cd rice varieties grown under drained aerobic conditions, which increase soil Cd bioavailability, are the most promising plants for phytoextracting Cd from Cd-contaminated paddy fields [8,9]. Another advantage of the use of high-Cd rice in paddy fields is that it allows farmers to use their own cultivation techniques and machinery [5,9]. Murakami et al. reported that phytoextraction involving the use of the high-Cd rice variety Cho-ko-koku reduced the Cd concentration in the soil by 38% after approximately two years of cultivation and reduced the grain Cd concentration in an edible japonica rice variety by 47% after Cd phytoextraction [10]. If genetic research can lead to further increases in the ability of high-Cd rice varieties to phytoextract Cd from the soil, the time needed for and costs of soil remediation could be reduced.
Owing to genetic differences governing the differential accumulation of Cd in rice plants, the genes involved in rice Cd transport have been identified and functionally analyzed [11]. The high-Cd rice varieties Jarjan, Anjana Dhan, and Cho-ko-koku were identified from among diverse rice accessions [12]. These varieties exhibited high Cd accumulation in their shoots due to a defect in the function of the OsHMA3 protein, a transporter belonging to the P1B-type ATPase family, which is localized on the tonoplast, to sequester Cd in the roots [13,14,15]. However, these indica varieties are not amenable for Cd phytoextraction in Japanese paddy soils due to their seed shattering and susceptibility to lodging [16]. Therefore, several high-Cd rice varieties with improved shattering and lodging were developed through DNA marker selection using the loss-of-function allele of OsHMA3 or mutagenesis, and the ability of these varieties to extract Cd from soils was evaluated [16,17,18,19]. For example, the rice line TJTT8, in which the OsHMA3 allele of Jarjan was introduced into the genetic background of Tachisugata, which was developed for whole-crop silage, showed higher Cd extraction capacity than Jarjan or Cho-ko-koku on several Cd-contaminated fields [16]. In addition, TJTT8 showed less shattering and lodging resistance and exhibited high local adaptability, which could make it a useful Cd phytoextractor for Cd-contaminated paddy fields.
Ueno et al. selected the indica rice variety Nepal 555 as a high-Cd-accumulating accession and detected two major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible for the high-Cd phenotype [20]. Both QTLs were detected in chromosome regions where OsHMA3 was not present, indicating that the high Cd accumulation in Nepal 555 is not due to the loss of function of OsHMA3. This may allow the breeding of rice plants with superior Cd accumulation by pyramiding QTLs or alleles involved in high Cd accumulation, which is expected to increase the efficiency of Cd phytoextraction from the soil.
In this study, a rice variety pyramiding the OsHMA3 allele from Jarjan and QTLs from Nepal 555, both of which accumulate high amounts of Cd in their shoots, was developed through three-way crosses with Tachisugata. The developed variety, named TJN25-11, presented significantly higher Cd in shoots than TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku, confirming the QTL pyramiding effect of phytoextracting soil Cd by rice plants grown in Cd-contaminated paddy fields.

2. Results

2.1. Agronomic Traits and Cd Accumulation Ability of Parental Varieties

We characterized several agronomic traits of three parental varieties grown in two Cd-polluted fields in different regions of Japan (Table 1). The soils of both fields are classified as mottled gley lowland soils (Supplementary Table S1). The soil texture was a sandy loam in both fields, but field A contained more sand than field B. The soil Cd concentration extracted by 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) was higher in field B than in field A.
The days to heading (DH) of Jarjan, Nepal 555, and Tachisugata grown in field A were 110 days, 104 days, and 107 days, respectively. The DH of the three varieties grown in field B were slightly longer than those grown in field A, but varietal differences in DH showed similar trends. In field A, the culm length was longest for Nepal 555, followed by those for Jarjan and Tachisugata. When grown in field B, Jarjan and Nepal 555 had similar culm lengths, with Tachisugata having the shortest culm length. Nepal 555 was susceptible to lodging at maturity. Jarjan and Nepal 555 were susceptible to shattering at maturity, while Tachisugata was resistant.
The Cd concentrations of the straw and grain of the three parental varieties grown in the two Cd-polluted fields were analyzed, and the total amounts of Cd that accumulated in the aerial parts were calculated by multiplying the Cd concentrations by the plant dry weight (Table 1). In field A, the average Cd concentration in the straw was the highest for Jarjan, followed by Nepal 555, and it was lowest for Tachisugata, although there were no significant differences between the varieties due to the large standard deviation. On the other hand, the average grain Cd concentration of Jarjan was four times greater than that of Tachisugata and twofold greater than that of Nepal 555, and a significant difference was detected between Jarjan and Tachisugata. Similarly, in field B, the average straw Cd concentration of Nepal 555 was between those of Jarjan and Tachisugata, and the Cd concentration in the grain was the same as that for Tachisugata. The Cd concentration ratio of grain/straw differed greatly between Jarjan and Napal 555; in field A, Jarjan exhibited greater shoot-to-grain Cd transfer than Nepal 555. Thus, different Cd accumulation profiles in plant tissues were observed between Nepal 555 and Jarjan, indicating that Cd accumulation in Nepal 555 may be regulated by a genetic process different from that of Jarjan. Consistent with Cd concentrations in rice straw, the Cd accumulation in aerial parts was the highest for Jarjan, followed by Nepal 555, and it was lowest in Tachisugata.

2.2. Development of TJN25-11 by a Three-Way Cross

Figure 1 shows the summarized process used to breed TJN25-11. F1 individuals of the TJN lines were obtained by crossing the Tachisugata/Jarjan//Tachisugata///Tachisugata (TJTT; BC2F2) lines and the Tachisugata/Nepal 555//Tachisugata (TNT; BC1F2) lines. The F1 plants were self-pollinated to obtain an F2 population. By the use of marker-assisted selection (MAS) involving simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (Supplementary Table S2), 31 individuals of the F2 population were found to have inherited the OsHMA3 allele for high Cd accumulation and an Rc allele for brown pericarp from Jarjan, two QTLs (henceforth referred to as QTL6 and QTL11) for high Cd accumulation from Nepal 555, and the qSH1 allele for nonshattering from Tachisugata. The QTL6 and QTL11 used in this study were taken from the results of Ueno et al. (2009) [20]. Because SSR markers to detect QTL6 and QTL11 have been unpublished, primer sequences of the markers are not presented here. After the F2 generation, the individuals were repeatedly self-pollinated. In the F4 to F6 generations, line selection was performed by evaluating the Cd accumulation ability and agronomic traits such as plant shape and lodging resistance of each line grown in the two fields. Figure S1 shows the ratio of the straw Cd concentration of F4 progeny of TJN lines to that of Jarjan when grown in field B. Although all TJN lines have the Jarjan-type OsHMA3 allele and the Nepal 555-type QTLs, not all TJN lines had straw Cd concentrations that were significantly higher than those of Jarjan. The effect of QTL pyramiding on increased Cd concentration was observed in only five lines, namely, TJN11-1, TJN12-2, TJN13-1, TJN14-1 and TJN25-11. Among them, TJN25-11 was selected as a candidate line because it presented high Cd accumulation and good plant shape (Figure 2).

2.3. QTL Analysis

Because the effects of QTL6 and QTL11 on increasing Cd accumulation were uncertain in the genetic background of Tachisugata, we performed a QTL analysis of straw Cd concentrations in an F2 population derived from a cross between Nepal 555 and Tachisugata. When the F2 population of 93 individuals was cultivated in field B, two major QTLs were detected (Table 2). One QTL, named qHCd2, was located on the long arm of chromosome 2 (RM1211-RM5303; nearest marker: RM1385), in which the Tachisugata allele was associated with the high Cd concentration in the straw. Another QTL, qHCd6, was located on the short arm of chromosome 6 (RM3414-RM2615; nearest marker: RM8258), in which the Nepal 555 allele was associated with the high Cd concentration in the straw. Because QTL6 was detected on the long arm of chromosome 6 [20], qHCd6 appeared to differ from QTL6. The logarithm of odds (LOD) values were 4.57 for qHCd2 and 5.76 for qHCd6.
TJN25-11 was genotyped using two SSR markers, namely, RM1385 and RM8258, for the detection of qHCd2 and qHCd6, respectively. The RM1385 and RM8258 loci of TJN25-11 were Tachisugata-type homozygotes and Nepal 555-type homozygotes, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3). These results suggest that TJN25-11 has newly identified high-Cd QTLs.

2.4. Characteristics of TJN25-11

Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 show the properties of TJN25-11 grown in two farmers’ fields. The properties of TJN25-11 were compared with those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. In the field tests, water management was carried out in accordance with the early drainage management method to promote Cd availability in the soil.

2.4.1. Agronomic Traits of TJN25-11

Table 3 shows the agronomic traits of TJN25-11. In field A, the DH of TJN25-11 was 117 days, which was one day later than that of TJTT8 and five days later than that of Cho-ko-koku. In field B, the DH of TJN25-11 was 123 days, which was two days later than that of TJTT8 and eight days later than that of Cho-ko-koku. The culm length of TJN25-11 was 94 cm in field A, which was significantly higher than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. In field B, the culm length of TJN25-11 was 102 cm and tended to be higher than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku, but the difference was not significant. In both fields, the straw weight of TJN25-11 was similar to that of TJTT8 and was significantly higher than that of Cho-ko-koku. The straw weight of TJN25-11 grown in field A was greatest—992 g m−2. On the other hand, the panicle weight of TJN25-11 was 332 g m−2 for field A and 150 g m−2 for field B, similar to that of TJTT8 and significantly lower than that of Cho-ko-koku. TJN25-11 and TJTT8 were resistant to lodging in both fields, whereas Cho-ko-koku was weakly resistant to lodging.

2.4.2. Cd Accumulation Ability of TJN25-11

Table 4 shows the Cd concentration and the amount of Cd accumulated in aerial parts of the plants grown in the two Cd-contaminated fields. In field A, the Cd concentration of the straw of TJN25-11 was 24.5 mg kg−1, which was higher than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku, although the difference was not significant. The Cd concentration of the panicles of TJN25-11 was 37.4 mg kg−1 and was three times higher than that of Cho-ko-koku. In field B, the Cd concentrations of the straw and panicles of TJN25-11 were 21.1 mg kg−1 and 27.9 mg kg−1, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. The amounts of Cd that accumulated in the straw and panicles are given in milligrams per square meter and were calculated by multiplying the Cd concentration by the dry weight of each part per square meter. In both fields, the straw and panicles of TJN25-11 accumulated the most Cd compared to those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. The total amounts of Cd accumulation in the aerial parts (straw + panicles) of TJN25-11 were 36.5 mg m−2 in field A and 20.5 mg m−2 in field B and were significantly higher than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. TJN25-11 accumulated approximately one and a half times to twice as much Cd as TJTT8 or Cho-ko-koku, respectively, in both fields, indicating that the ability of TJN25-11 to accumulate Cd is superior to those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku.

2.4.3. Cd-Phytoextraction Efficiency of TJN25-11

Table 5 shows the reduction in soil Cd concentrations after phytoextraction. The Cd concentrations in topsoil (0–15 cm) were estimated by extraction with 0.1 M HCl, which is the method stipulated by the Agricultural Land-Soil Pollution Prevention Law in Japan, before and after phytoextraction. The soil Cd concentrations in both fields decreased after phytoextraction. TJN25-11 reduced the soil Cd concentrations from 0.33 mg kg−1 to 0.26 mg kg−1 in field A and from 0.51 mg kg−1 to 0.40 mg kg−1 in field B. When the actual extraction efficiency of Cd from the soils was calculated from the Cd reduction in soil before and after planting, TJN25-11 presented values of 21.2% in field A and 21.6% in field B, the rates of which were greater than those of TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. The theoretical phytoextraction efficiency of soil Cd was also calculated from the total amount of Cd accumulation in the aerial parts, as shown in Table 4. Theoretical calculations based on shoot Cd accumulation yielded phytoextraction efficiency percentages that were seemingly higher than the actual percent reductions in soil Cd concentrations for all varieties, especially in field A.

3. Discussion

Previous studies have developed practical high-Cd rice varieties for phytoextraction of Cd from soils by improving traits that are disadvantageous to mechanical harvesting, such as shattering and lodging, of the high-Cd indica varieties Cho-ko-koku and Jarjan [16,17,18,19]. In addition to improving desirable agronomic traits, genetically increasing the ability to accumulate Cd is essential for efficient Cd-phytoextraction practices involving rice. In this study, using MAS, we successfully developed a new high-Cd-accumulating rice variety, TJN25-11, by the introduction of multiple genes associated with high Cd accumulation from Jarjan and Nepal 555 into the genetic background of Tachisugata.
Jarjan, one of the donor parents for the high-Cd-accumulation trait, accumulated more Cd in the straw and panicles as a result of failure by OsHMA3 to sequester Cd into the root cell vacuoles (Table 1) [15,21]. On the other hand, Nepal 555, another donor parent, exhibited a Cd accumulation profile that was different from that of Jarjan; Nepal 555 accumulated more Cd in the straw but less in the panicles with lower shoot-to-grain Cd transfer than Jarjan (Table 1). These phenotypic differences can be explained by the differences in gene loci controlling Cd accumulation between the two varieties. In fact, Ueno et al. (2009) identified two QTLs from Nepal 555, and the OsHMA3 gene was not present in these QTLs [20]. Moreover, two QTLs had an epistatic effect on shoot Cd accumulation [20], suggesting that both QTLs should be introduced into Tachisugata to obtain a high-Cd phenotype derived from Nepal 555. However, in this study, the epistatic effect was unclear because not all the TJN lines pyramided with target QTLs had straw Cd concentrations that were significantly higher than those of Jarjan (Supplementary Figure S1). QTL detection and effect might be affected by the genetic background of the population, plant age, tissues used for phenotypic evaluation, and experimental conditions [22]. Although Ueno et al. (2009) detected QTLs from Nepal 555, their Cd studies were conducted hydroponically, and young seedlings from the F2 population generated from a cross with the Shwe War variety were used [20]. Therefore, it is possible that QTL6 and QTL11 might not be effective in TJN accessions in the genetic background of Tachisugata. In fact, our QTL analysis revealed two new QTLs (qHCd2 and qHCd6) in the F2 population derived from Tachisugata and Nepal 555 (Table 2). qHCd6 appeared to be located in a region different from QTL6 on chromosome 6. Moreover, qHCd2 was detected on the long arm of chromosome 2 and was located near a QTL that increased the Cd concentration of shoots according to the results of a QTL analysis with the varieties Badari Dhan and Shwe War [23]. Since Tachisugata is a japonica-indica hybrid variety, it is possible that qHCd2 from Tachisugata is inherited from the high-Cd-accumulating indica variety Milyang 23, which is one of the ancestors of Tachisugata, although the QTLs related to high Cd accumulation in Milyang 23 have not yet been identified.
Since TJN25-11 has two newly found QTLs, the superior Cd accumulation of TJN25-11 may be attributed to these QTLs with the loss of function of the OsHMA3 allele. In addition to its superior Cd accumulation, TJN25-11 has several favorable traits, such as nonshattering and lodging resistance (Table 3), that are required for practical Cd phytoextraction in Japanese paddy fields. Such traits were obtained from Tachisugata, which was developed for whole-crop silage. The propensity for high shoot biomass of TJN25-11 is also likely to be inherited from Tachisugata. Since shoot Cd accumulation is determined by multiplying the Cd concentration by the dry weight, a high biomass would be advantageous for Cd-phytoextraction. The seeds of TJN25-11 are brown, the trait of which was inherited from the Jarjan-type Rc gene; these seeds are easily distinguishable from common Japanese rice seeds, which are white (Figure 2). Because the Rc and OsHMA3 genes are located in close proximity on chromosome 7, it was possible that they were detected simultaneously by the same markers. This seed color difference is necessary for reducing the risk of contamination of edible rice. When TJN25-11 was cultivated in Cd-contaminated fields under drainage conditions, seed fertility was relatively poor, resulting in low grain yield (Table 3). Poor seed fertility may also be an advantage for phytoextraction to prevent seed contamination. We confirmed that the seed fertility of TJN25-11 improved when the plants were grown in submerged conditions, suggesting that TJN25-11 may be sensitive to drought stress.
To assess the phytoextraction efficiency of Cd from soils, it is necessary to measure not only the amount of Cd accumulated in the shoots but also the amount of Cd removed from the soil. Of the rice varieties tested, the highest soil Cd reductions were observed after growing TJN25-11 (Table 5). This finding supports the highest Cd accumulation in aerial parts being found in TJN25-11, as shown in Table 4. Estimations revealed that TJN25-11 could remove approximately 21% of the initial Cd present in the soil. However, the theoretical removal efficiency calculated from the amount of Cd in the shoots was higher than 21%. In particular, there was a large gap between the actual and theoretical efficiencies obtained in field A. The soil texture of field A is sandy, so the soil is subject to thorough drying after early draining. Under such conditions, rice roots may search for water and penetrate soil layers deeper than the tillage layer (0–15 cm), absorbing Cd along with water from the deeper layers. The rate of decrease in the Cd concentration in the lower soil layers needs to be investigated in the future. In addition, the physiological and molecular mechanisms, including the genes involved in the increased Cd accumulation of TJN25-11, remain unknown and are challenges for the future. We believe that TJN25-11 could be a useful rice variety for phytoextraction in low-to-moderate-Cd-contaminated paddy fields and could contribute to food safety.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

TJN25-11 was developed from a three-way cross derived from Jarjan, Nepal 555, and Tachisugata. The characteristics of each parent variety are as follows: Both Jarjan and Nepal 555 are indica varieties that accumulate high amounts of Cd in their shoots, are easily shattered, are susceptible to lodging, and have brown pericarps. Tachisugata, a japonica-indica hybrid variety, is used for whole-crop silage because of its high biomass, strong culms, and nonshattering properties [24]. The breeding procedure of TJN25-11 is summarized in Table 1. Briefly, to produce TJTT lines, Tachisugata (recurrent parent) was crossed with Jarjan, a donor parent of the high-Cd (the QTL includes the loss-of-function allele of OsHMA3) and brown pericarp (Rc allele) traits, and the resulting F1 plants were crossed twice with Tachisugata. We carried out MAS from the BC1F1 generation to the BC2F2 generation to introduce the OsHMA3 and Rc alleles from Jarjan [15,21,25] and the nonshattering-related allele (qSH1) from Tachisugata [15,21,25,26]. For MAS, SSR markers RM5389 and RM1316-1 were used for the detection of qSH1. Another SSR marker set, RM6728 and RM21320, was used for the detection of both OsHMA3 and Rc alleles (Supplementary Table S2) [27,28]. In the TNT lines, Tachisugata was crossed twice with Nepal 555, a donor parent with two QTLs, namely, QTL6 and QTL11, for high shoot Cd concentrations [20]. We carried out MAS from the BC1F1 generation to the BC1F2 generation to introduce QTL6 and QTL11 from Nepal 555 and qSH1 from Tachisugata [26]. Because the SSR markers used to detect QTL6 and QTL11 have been unpublished, the primer sequences are not presented here. The detection of qSH1 was performed via the same marker used for the TJTT lines (Supplementary Table S2) [27,28].
The TJN lines were developed by crossing the TJTT lines (BC2F2) and TNT lines (BC1F2). In the F2 generation, the 31 TJN individuals were selected via MAS involving SSR markers at OsHMA3 (derived from Jarjan), Rc (derived from Jarjan), QTL6, QTL11 (derived from Nepal 555), and qSH1 (derived from Tachisugata) (Supplementary Table S2). In the F4 to F6 generations, line selection was performed by evaluating the plant shape and lodging resistance. In the F6 to F8 generations, the Cd accumulation ability of the candidate lines was tested by growing the plants in paddy fields. Afterward, the individual variability of a promising line was investigated in the F7 and F8 generations, and genetic fixation was ultimately confirmed.
TJTT8, which is a backcross inbred line derived from Jarjan and Tachisugata, was previously produced for practical Cd phytoextraction use [16]. This variety and Cho-ko-koku, a reference variety for evaluating Cd accumulation ability, were also grown in paddy fields to compare their properties with the properties of TJN25-11.

4.2. Field Tests

Field A and field B were farmers’ fields located in the middle and northeastern regions of Japan. Soil samples were collected from each field to a depth of 15 cm from the surface soil before and after planting. Soil physicochemical properties were measured according to the methods of Ishikawa et al. [29]. Rice seedlings were transplanted into each paddy field at the same time in mid-to-end-May under submerged conditions. Irrigation water was withheld around the end of June to promote the availability of Cd in the soil. Afterward, the paddy fields were managed under rain-fed conditions until harvest [16]. Fertilizers consisting of N, P2O5, and K2O were applied to the fields according to the standards of local farmers.

4.3. Evaluation of Agronomic Traits

Agronomic traits were evaluated according to the methods of Abe et al. [16]. The number of test plots for evaluation of the parental varieties was replicated twice (two plots), and that of TJN25-11 was replicated three times (three plots). The culm length, panicle length, and number of panicles were measured on 10 or 20 hills for each plot. The yield of straw and grain was measured for six samples collected from each plot to evaluate the parental varieties. The yield of the straw and panicles was measured for 20 hills per plot for the evaluation of TJN25-11. The heading date was considered the day when 50% of the panicles headed. The lodging degree was scored by observations at maturity based on the proportion of lodging individuals out of the total number of individuals: 0 for all plants erect, 1 for <20% of the plants that became lodged, 2 for 20–40%, 3 for 40–60%, 4 for 60–80%, and 5 for 80–100% (few plants erect). Shattering was evaluated by gripping and pulling the maturing panicles by hand at 35–40 days after heading and was categorized as resistant (r), moderate (m), or susceptible (s) based on the percentage of shattering grains, i.e., less than 20%, more than 20% but less than 50%, and more than 50%, respectively.

4.4. Cd Analysis

The plant materials were divided into grains or panicles and straw. The samples were dried and ground to a fine powder with a grinder equipped with a titanium-coated blade to avoid the possible contamination of Cd and other metals. Acid digestion and analysis of Cd concentrations in the rice plants were performed by outsourcing analytical services specializing in metal analysis (Industrial Analysis Service, Ltd., Saitama, Japan). A total of 0.5 g of each ground sample was weighed, placed into a polytetrafluoroethylene tube, and digested with 6 mL of 61% HNO3 and 2 mL of 30% H2O2 using a microwave digestion system (MW3000, Anton Paar, Austria). The digested solution was filtered, and the total volume was brought to 50 mL with Milli-Q water. The concentrations of Cd in the plant tissue were determined with an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (7500 series, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.5. QTL Analysis of Straw Cd Concentrations

QTL analysis for increased Cd concentrations in the straw was performed according to the methods of Abe et al. (2011) [21]. A mapping F2 population consisting of 93 individuals was generated by crossing Tachisugata and Nepal 555 and genotyped by the use of 110 SSR markers (Supplementary Figure S2) [27,28]. For phenotypic evaluations, the population was grown in field B under the same conditions as those described above, and the Cd concentration in the straw was measured. A linkage map was constructed from the genotypic data with MapMaker/EXP version 3.0 [30]. QTL analysis was performed using composite interval mapping by QTL Cartographer version 2.5 (https://brcwebportal.cos.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/ (accessed on 1 April 2013)). Genome-wide threshold values (α = 0.05) were used to detect putative QTLs based on the results of 1000 permutations.

4.6. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed with Ekuseru-Toukei 2006 statistics software (Social Survey Research Information Co., Tokyo, Japan). Tukey tests were conducted to determine significant differences in Cd contents and agronomic traits.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11162178/s1. Figure S1: Ratio of straw Cd concentration in 31 TJN lines to that in Jarjan in field B. Figure S2: Physical map of SSR markers used for QTL analysis in F2 plants derived from Tachisugata and Nepal 555. Figure S3: Genotype of TJN25-11 at the nearest SSR marker to the putative QTLs. Table S1: Physicochemical properties of soils in fields A and B. Table S2: List of SSR markers used for MAS in the development of TJN lines.

Author Contributions

T.A. and S.I. designed the research. T.A., M.K. and S.I. developed the rice variety through DNA-MAS. M.I., R.T. and T.H. performed the field experiments and prepared the samples for Cd analysis. T.A. and S.I. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (Genome for Agricultural Innovation, QTL-4006; Regulatory Research Projects for Food Safety, Animal Health and Plant Protection, No. 2603).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within this article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Research Center of Genetic Resources of NARO for providing seeds of Jarjan and Nepal 555, Ikuo Ando (JATAFF) for providing seeds of Tachisugata, and Masahiro Yano (NARO) for providing SSR markers to detect QTL6 and QTL11. We also thank Akira Kawasaki (NARO), Masaharu Murakami (NARO), Naoki Sekiya (Nagano Prefecture Farmers Academy, Nagano, Japan), and Kensuke Shirao (Central Kumamoto Administrative Headquarters, Kumamoto, Japan) for their useful suggestions; Hiroyuki Iino, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, and Terushi Kamada (NARO) for their expert field assistance; and Hachidai Tanikawa and Mizuna Chiba (NARO) for their laboratory assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, L.; Cui, X.; Cheng, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, J.; Zhao, X.; Lin, C.; Pu, X. A review of soil cadmium contamination in China including a health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 16441–16452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. CODEX Alimentarius. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed. CXS 193-1995. 2019. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B193-1995%252FCXS_193e.pdf (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  3. Arao, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Murakami, M.; Abe, K.; Maejima, Y.; Makino, T. Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soil and countermeasures in Japan. Paddy Water Environ. 2010, 8, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ishikawa, S.; Ishimaru, Y.; Igura, M.; Kuramata, M.; Abe, T.; Senoura, T.; Hase, Y.; Arao, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. Ion-beam irradiation, gene identification, and marker-assisted breeding in the development of low-cadmium rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19166–19171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ibaraki, T.; Kuroyanagi, N.; Murakami, M. Practical phytoextraction in cadmium-polluted paddy fields using a high cadmium accumulating rice plant cultured by early drainage of irrigation water. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2009, 55, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, F.J.; Tang, Z.; Song, J.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, P. Toxic metals and metalloids: Uptake, transport, detoxification, phytoremediation, and crop improvement for safer food. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ebbs, S.D.; Lasat, M.M.; Brady, D.J.; Cornish, J.; Gordon, R.; Kochian, L.V. Phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc from a contaminated soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1997, 26, 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ishikawa, S.; Ae, N.; Murakami, M.; Wagatsuma, T. Is Brassica juncea a suitable plant for phytoremediation of cadmium in soils with moderately low cadmium contamination? - Possibility of using other plant species for Cd-phytoextraction. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2006, 52, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Murakami, M.; Ae, N.; Ishikawa, S. Phytoextraction of cadmium by rice (Oryza sativa L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), and maize (Zea mays L.). Environ. Pollut. 2007, 145, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murakami, M.; Nakagawa, F.; Ae, N.; Ito, M.; Arao, T. Phytoextraction by rice capable of accumulating Cd at high levels: Reduction of Cd content of rice grain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 5878–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takahashi, R.; Ito, M.; Kawamoto, T. The Road to Practical Application of Cadmium Phytoremediation Using Rice. Plants 2021, 10, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uraguchi, S.; Mori, S.; Kuramata, M.; Kawasaki, A.; Arao, T.; Ishikawa, S. Root-to-shoot Cd translocation via the xylem is the major process determining shoot and grain cadmium accumulation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2677–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Miyadate, H.; Adachi, S.; Hiraizumi, A.; Tezuka, K.; Nakazawa, N.; Kawamoto, T.; Katou, K.; Kodama, I.; Sakurai, K.; Takahashi, H.; et al. OsHMA3, a P-1B-type of ATPase affects root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in rice by mediating efflux into vacuoles. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ueno, D.; Yamaji, N.; Kono, I.; Huang, C.F.; Ando, T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. Gene limiting cadmium accumulation in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16500–16505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ueno, D.; Koyama, E.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Physiological, genetic, and molecular characterization of a high-Cd-accumulating rice cultivar, Jarjan. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2265–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abe, T.; Ito, M.; Takahashi, R.; Honma, T.; Sekiya, N.; Shirao, K.; Kuramata, M.; Murakami, M.; Ishikawa, S. Breeding of a practical rice line “TJTT8” for phytoextraction of cadmium contamination in paddy fields. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 63, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Abe, T.; Kuramata, M.; Iwasaki, M.; Honma, T.; Ibaraki, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yano, M.; Murakami, M.; Ishikawa, S. “MJ3” and “MA22”, new high-cadmium-accumulating practical rice lines with non-shattering derived from gamma ray mutation. Breed. Res. 2013, 15, 17–24. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takahashi, R.; Ito, M.; Katou, K.; Sato, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Tezuka, K.; Akagi, H.; Kawamoto, T. Breeding and characterization of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) line “Akita 110” for cadmium phytoremediation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 62, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Takahashi, R.; Ito, M.; Kato, K.; Kodama, I.; Shibata, S.; Sato, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Kawamoto, T. Breeding and characterization of the high cadmium-accumulating rice line ‘Akita 119’. Breed. Sci. 2020, 70, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ueno, D.; Kono, I.; Yokosho, K.; Ando, T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. Identification of a novel QTL for shoot Cd accumulation in rice. UC Davis Dep. Plant Sci. 2009. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2bb1f8fb (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  21. Abe, T.; Taguchi-Shiobara, F.; Kojima, Y.; Ebitani, T.; Kuramata, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yano, M.; Ishikawa, S. Detection of a QTL for accumulating Cd in rice that enables efficient Cd phytoextraction from soil. Breed. Sci. 2011, 61, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xue, D.W.; Chen, M.C.; Zhang, G.P. Mapping of QTLs associated with cadmium tolerance and accumulation during seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 2009, 165, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ueno, D.; Kono, I.; Yokosho, K.; Ando, T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. A major quantitative trait locus controlling cadmium translocation in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2009, 182, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ohta, H.; Nemoto, H.; Ando, I.; Kato, H.; Sato, H.; Hirabayashi, H.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ishii, T.; Maeda, H.; Imbe, T.; et al. “Tachisugata”, a new rice cultivar for whole crop silage use. Bull. Natl. Inst. Crop. Sci. 2010, 11, 67–84, (In Japanese with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  25. Furukawa, T.; Maekawa, M.; Oki, T.; Suda, I.; Iida, S.; Shimada, H.; Takamure, I.; Kadowaki, K.I. The Rc and Rd genes are involved in proanthocyanidin synthesis in rice pericarp. Plant J. 2007, 49, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Konishi, S.; Izawa, T.; Lin, S.Y.; Ebana, K.; Fukuta, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Yano, M. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 2006, 312, 1392–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. McCouch, S.R.; Teytelman, L.; Xu, Y.B.; Lobos, K.B.; Clare, K.; Walton, M.; Fu, B.Y.; Maghirang, R.; Li, Z.K.; Xing, Y.Z.; et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res. 2002, 9, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project; Sasaki, T. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nuture 2005, 436, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ishikawa, S.; Makino, T.; Ito, M.; Harada, K.; Nakada, H.; Nishida, I.; Nishimura, M.; Tokunaga, T.; Shirao, K.; Yoshizawa, C.; et al. Low-cadmium rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar can simultaneously reduce arsenic and cadmium concentrations in rice grains. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 62, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lander, E.; Abrahamason, J.; Barlow, A.; Daly, M.; Lincoln, S.; Newburg, L.; Green, P. MAPMAKER: An interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1987, 1, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02178 g001 550
Figure 1. Breeding procedure used in this study. *: GH; greenhouse, F; field. **: TCS; Tachisugata, JRJ; Jarjan, NPL; Nepal555, TJTT line; TCS/JRJ//TCS///TCS (BC2F2), TNT line; TCS/NPL//TCS (BC1F2).
Figure 1. Breeding procedure used in this study. *: GH; greenhouse, F; field. **: TCS; Tachisugata, JRJ; Jarjan, NPL; Nepal555, TJTT line; TCS/JRJ//TCS///TCS (BC2F2), TNT line; TCS/NPL//TCS (BC1F2).
Plants 11 02178 g001
Plants 11 02178 g002 550
Figure 2. Plant shape (A) of TJN25-11 and Tachisugata and grain shapes (B) of TJN25-11 and Koshihikari grown in the field.
Figure 2. Plant shape (A) of TJN25-11 and Tachisugata and grain shapes (B) of TJN25-11 and Koshihikari grown in the field.
Plants 11 02178 g002
Table
Table 1. Agronomic traits and Cd accumulation ability of parental varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
Table 1. Agronomic traits and Cd accumulation ability of parental varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
VarietyDays to HeadingCulm LengthLodging DegreeShattering BehaviorCd ConcentrationTotal Amount of Cd Accumulation in Aerial Parts
StrawGrain
(cm)(0–5)(s-r)(mg kg−1)(mg kg−1)(mg m−2)
Field AJarjan110109 b0.0s10.0 a ± 6.08.7 a ± 8.18.8 a
Nepal 555104118 a4.0s8.6 a ± 6.32.0 ab ± 1.54.7 ab
Tachisugata10794 c0.0r4.0 a ± 3.01.3 b ± 1.02.1 b
Field BJarjan115129 a0.0s14.5 a ± 3.24.9 a ± 1.013.7 a
Nepal 555107126 a3.0s10.6 b ± 2.72.2 b ± 0.59.8 b
Tachisugata111101 b0.0r7.2 b ± 1.52.2 b ± 0.46.6 c
The data are the means ± standard deviations. The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey–Kramer test (only culm length in field B) or the Tukey test (other data). Lodging degree: 0 for all plants erect, 1 for <20% of the plants that became lodged, 2 for 20–40%, 3 for 40–60%, 4 for 60–80%, and 5 for 80–100% (few plants erect). Shattering was categorized as resistant (r), moderate (m), or susceptible (s) based on the percentage of shattering grains, i.e., less than 20%, more than 20% but less than 50%, and more than 50%, respectively, at 35–40 days after heading. The culm length was measured on 20 hills (although only Nepal 555 in field B was 10 hills). The sample number for Cd concentration and total amount of Cd accumulation were measured in three samples with two hills combined per plot. The experiment was performed on two plots.
Table
Table 2. Positions and effects of putative QTLs for high Cd concentration in rice straw.
Table 2. Positions and effects of putative QTLs for high Cd concentration in rice straw.
Chr.QTLMarker IntervalNearest MarkerLOD *R2 **AE ***
2qHCd2RM1211-RM5303RM13854.5718.81.05
6qHCd6RM3414-RM2615RM82585.7622.8−1.17
*: After 1000-permutation tests, the threshold values of the LOD for Cd concentrations of straw were calculated as 4.0. **: R2 represents the proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by each QTL. ***: A negative value of the additive effect (AE) indicates that the allele from Nepal 555 increased the phenotypic value.
Table
Table 3. Agronomic traits of rice varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
Table 3. Agronomic traits of rice varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
VarietyDays to HeadingCulm LengthStraw WeightPanicle WeightLodging Degree
(cm)(g m−2)(g m−2)(0–5)
Field ATJN25-1111794 a ± 3.2992 a ± 60332 a ± 390
TJTT811681 b ± 1.3922 a ± 9237 a ± 530
Cho-ko-koku11282 b ± 3.2651 b ± 89594 b ± 1102
Field BTJN25-11123102 a ± 4.1777 a ± 75150 a ± 180
TJTT8121 94 a ± 1.8784 a ± 69137 a ± 120
Cho-ko-koku115100 a ± 4.6613 b ± 40328 b ± 483
The data are the means ± standard deviations. The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey test. Lodging degree: 0 for all plants erect, 1 for <20% of the plants that became lodged, 2 for 20–40%, 3 for 40–60%, 4 for 60–80%, and 5 for 80–100% (few plants erect). The culm length was measured on 10 hills per plot. The weight of the straw and panicles were measured for 20 hills per plot. The experiment was performed on three plots.
Table
Table 4. Cd concentration and amount of Cd accumulated in rice grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
Table 4. Cd concentration and amount of Cd accumulated in rice grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
VarietyCd ConcentrationAmount of Cd That Accumulated *Total Amount of Cd that Accumulated in Aerial Parts **
StrawPanicleStrawPanicle
(mg kg−1)(mg kg−1)(mg m−2)(mg m−2)(mg m−2)
Field ATJN25-1124.5 a ± 2.937.4 a ± 5.524.2 a ± 1.712.3 a ± 0.736.5 a ± 2.2
TJTT819.7 a ± 2.626.4 a ± 4.318.2 ab ± 2.46.1 b ± 0.324.3 b ± 2.3
Cho-ko-koku18.2 a ± 3.411.2 b ± 4.712.0 b ± 3.36.3 b ± 1.418.3 b ± 4.8
Field BTJN25-1121.1 a ± 1.427.9 a ± 2.416.3 a ± 1.74.2 a ± 0.220.5 a ± 1.6
TJTT815.0 b ± 1.315.8 b ± 2.411.8 b ± 1.82.2 b ± 0.414.0 b ± 2.0
Cho-ko-koku12.8 b ± 0.75.7 c ± 0.47.9 c ± 0.81.9 b ± 0.49.7 c ± 1.1
The data are the means ± standard deviations (n = 3). The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey test. The experiment included three repetitions. *: Amount of Cd that accumulated in each tissue, calculated by multiplying the Cd concentration by dry weight (cited from Table 3). **: Total amount of Cd that accumulated, calculated from sum of the amounts of Cd in the straw and panicles.
Table
Table 5. Changes in soil Cd concentrations before and after planting and phytoextraction efficiency.
Table 5. Changes in soil Cd concentrations before and after planting and phytoextraction efficiency.
VarietySoil Cd Concentration (0.1 M HCl Extractable)Average Amount of Cd in the Soil Total Amount of Cd That Accumulated in Aerial Parts (F) ***Phytoextraction Efficiency
Before
Planting
(A)		After
Planting
(B)		Before
Planting
(C) *		After
Planting
(D) **		Reduction
(E = C − D)		Actual Reduction Rate of Soil Cd #Theoretical Reduction Rate of Soil Cd $
(mg kg−1)(mg kg−1)(mg m−2)(mg m−2)(mg m−2)(mg m−2)(%)(%)
Field ATJN25-110.33 ± 0.050.26 ± 0.0249.539.010.536.521.273.7
TJTT80.34 ± 0.060.30 ± 0.0651.045.06.024.311.847.6
Cho-ko-koku0.32 ± 0.060.30 ± 0.0548.045.03.018.3 6.338.1
Field BTJN25-110.51 ± 0.000.40 ± 0.0676.560.016.520.521.626.8
TJTT80.53 ± 0.040.47 ± 0.0879.570.59.014.011.317.6
Cho-ko-koku0.50 ± 0.060.46 ± 0.0775.069.06.0 9.7 8.012.9
The soil Cd concentration data are the means ± standard deviations (n = 3). The other data are the means. *, **, (A or B) × (topsoil depth: 0–15 cm) × (soil bulk density: 1) × (area). ***, Each value is cited in Table 4. #, (E/C) × 100. $, (F/C) × 100.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abe, T.; Ito, M.; Takahashi, R.; Honma, T.; Kuramata, M.; Ishikawa, S. QTL Pyramiding and Its Use in Breeding for Increasing the Phytoextraction Efficiency of Soil Cd via High-Cd-Accumulating Rice. Plants 2022, 11, 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162178

AMA Style

Abe T, Ito M, Takahashi R, Honma T, Kuramata M, Ishikawa S. QTL Pyramiding and Its Use in Breeding for Increasing the Phytoextraction Efficiency of Soil Cd via High-Cd-Accumulating Rice. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abe, Tadashi, Masashi Ito, Ryuichi Takahashi, Toshimitsu Honma, Masato Kuramata, and Satoru Ishikawa. 2022. "QTL Pyramiding and Its Use in Breeding for Increasing the Phytoextraction Efficiency of Soil Cd via High-Cd-Accumulating Rice" Plants 11, no. 16: 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop