Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Spontaneous Melanization by Fluorescence Spectroscopy: A Basis for Analytical Application to Biological Substrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Diminishing the Pathogenesis of the Food-Borne Pathogen Serratia marcescens by Low Doses of Sodium Citrate
Previous Article in Journal
Upregulation of Sarcolemmal Hemichannels and Inflammatory Transcripts with Neuromuscular Junction Instability during Lower Limb Unloading in Humans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Gene Detection, and Biofilm Formation in Aeromonas spp. Isolated from Fish and Humans in Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dissolved Carbon Dioxide: The Lifespan of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis in Bottled Carbonated Mineral Water

1
Department for Water-Hygiene and Micro-Ecology, D&R Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
2
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
3
Applied Hygiene and Aerobiology, D&R Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(3), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030432
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Contamination and Food Safety)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The consumption of bottled mineral water has been rising in the last decades. During the water bottling process, the risk of bacterial contamination with pathogen bacteria is a well-known problem. In this study, the influence of different carbon dioxide concentrations, in mineral water bottles, on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis was investigated. Inside an Austrian mineral water bottling factory, a sum of 160 glass bottles with different carbon dioxide concentrations (3.0 g/L, 5.5 g/L, and 7.0 g/L) were capped after artificial contamination, stored at room temperature (20 °C), kept away from light, and dried in the laboratory. Water samples from freshly opened bottles were filtrated and cultivated on agar media to determine the number of colony-forming units over a period of 30 days. After the 23rd day, no more cultivable bacteria were detected in the samples from the freshly opened bottles. This observation leads to the conclusion that carbonated mineral water is an inappropriate habitat for Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis.

Abstract

During the process of mineral water production, many possible contamination settings can influence the quality of bottled water. Microbial contamination can originate from different sources, for example, the ambient air, the bottles, the caps, and from the bottling machine itself. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of three different carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations (3.0 g/L, 5.5 g/L, and 7.0 g/L; 20 bottles each) in bottled mineral water on the bacterial growth of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Enterococcus faecalis (Ent. faecalis). The examined mineral water was artificially contaminated before capping the bottles inside the factory. After a specific number of days, water samples were taken from freshly opened bottles and after filtration (100 mL), filters were placed on Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep blood to cultivate S. aureus and Slanetz and Bartley Agar to cultivate Ent. faecalis. The respective colony-forming units (CFU) were counted after incubation times ranging from 24 to 120 h. Colony-forming units of S. aureus were not detectable after the 16th and 27th day, whereas Ent. faecalis was not cultivable after the 5th and 13th day when stored inside the bottles. The investigation of the bottles that were stored open for a certain amount of time with CO2 bubbling out showed only single colonies for S. aureus after the 5th day and no CFUs for Ent. faecalis after the 17th day. A reduction in the two investigated bacterial strains during storage in carbonated mineral water bottles means that a proper standardized disinfection and cleaning procedure, according to valid hygiene standards of industrial bottling machines, cannot be replaced by carbonation.

1. Introduction

The Codex Alimentarius Austriacus [1] and the Austrian regulations for mineral and well water [2] describe the requirements for the production of bottled mineral water in its carbonated and non-carbonated forms. Escherichia coli (E. coli), coliform bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and Enterococcus sp. must not be detectable in 250 mL of a bottled water sample, while all cultivable bacteria within the bottles must not originate from the production process [1]. The absence of coliform bacteria and fecal coliforms indicates the good quality of the investigated water, whereas determining the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is not directed. A dependence of bacterial growth on pH value present in different matrices was shown in recent studies, with S. aureus having a more sensitive parameter to pH value than Staphylococcus epidermidis [3]. In 2005, a study described a dependency on the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration with the growth rate of S. aureus at an incubation temperature of 37 °C. Staphylococcus aureus were cultivated on blood agar and exposed to pure CO2, a standard anaerobic gas, or air, over a period of 24 h [4]. Recent studies on methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were concerned with antibacterial material and pathogeny [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The survival of Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, and Klebsiella pneumonia were investigated in bottled still water and demonstrated a reduction of colony-forming units (CFUs) over a period of twenty days [13]. An investigation of P. aeruginosa and Ent. faecalis biofilms on carvacrol was recently described by Mechmechani et al. The combination of pepsin and trypsin with carvacrol treatment was more efficient than treatment with carvacrol alone [14]. Healthcare-associated infections caused by Ent. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium with resistance to multiple antimicrobial compounds can be challenging [15]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently proclaimed that “we are entering a post-antibiotic era” owing to the intense use of antibiotics over the previous decades for agricultural and therapeutic purposes [16].
In 2020, Mohamed et al. showed that different bottled water brands in Nairobi, Kenya were contaminated with multidrug-resistant bacteria [17]. To determine the presence of microorganisms in water, different methods like multitube fermentation, filtration with subsequent plate cultivation, metagenomics analysis, biobased sensor solutions, and flow cytometry have previously been developed [18,19,20,21,22,23]. An often applied method to detect waterborne bacteria is the heterotrophic plate count (HPC) [24,25,26]. In 2012, Duranceau et al. investigated the influence of storage conditions for bottled water using the HPC. No significant increase in HPCs was found with bottles stored inside the house at room temperature or in a fridge (2 °C). The bottles stored on the porch or in a car trunk showed increased microbial growth [27]. Venieri et al. investigated the microbial contamination of non-carbonated bottled water in Greece. Enterococcus spp. was present in four out of the ten examined brands [28]. Plastic containers tended to be more permeable to external oxygen, which led to higher numbers of bacteria inside plastic bottles than in glass fabricates [13]. The findings of a recently published study show that no enterococci were present in bottled water sold in Mureş County in Romania. Maximum contamination of 4000 CFU/mL was found in flat spring bottled water [29]. The presence of S. aureus in approximately 25% of all investigated samples of drinking water in São Paulo was reported by Santos et al. in 2020. All water samples met the bacteriological water quality criteria according to Brazilian regulations, although 27% of the S. aureus-positive samples carried the mecA gene, indicating potential methicillin resistance [30]. Isolates of S. aureus in rural drinking water specimen was investigated in 1980 and showed no correlation with the presence of total coliform bacteria. However, 40% of the examined samples were positive for S. aureus [31]. In Nigeria, multidrug-resistant strains of S. aureus were isolated from clinical and drinking water sources [32]. The irrigation of S. aureus-infected chronic wounds with tap water has been a topic of discussion in the past [33]. Nagoba et al. suggested using boiled water, distilled water, or packed mineral water instead of tap water because of the risk of adding pathogenic microorganisms to the infected wound [34]. Hospital-associated urinary tract infections caused by MRSA are potentially life-threatening for catheterized individuals. For this reason, S. aureus should be avoided in the hospital environment [35]. An investigation of S. aureus growth in tryptic soy broth containing acidic hot spring water (60%, pH 3.9) was realized by Akiyama et al. CFUs were ten times lower than in tryptic soy broth alone after incubation for 24 h [36]. Slightly acidic electrolyzed water was found to be a growth-inhibiting habitat for S. aureus and other pathogenic bacteria [37]. The biofilm formation of S. aureus related to food and food packing materials has been intensely investigated in the past. The influence of pH value, temperature, and surface kind are the predominant factors for S. aureus growth [38,39,40,41]. A study, which investigated the mycological and bacteriological quality of bottled water in Ethiopia, showed that about 40% of all bottled water samples were unsuitable for human consumption. The carbonated drinking water samples were reported as free of S. aureus, thermotolerant coliforms, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Shigella with no indication given for CO2 concentration [42]. Around 14% of all water samples derived from bottled water brands in Ile-Ife Nigeria were contaminated with S. aureus. The authors concluded that bottled water provided by small companies was of unacceptable bacteriological quality [43].
In the literature, different potential mechanisms of CO2 affecting microorganisms are described [44,45,46,47]. A decrease in intracellular pH caused by a decrease in extracellular pH during CO2 exposure, when pH homeostatic systems are exceeded, can cause cell damage [48,49]. Garcia-Gonzales et al. described the effects of low pH and the possible influence of CO2 on the integrity of the cell membrane in 2010 [50,51,52]. The destruction of the cell membrane can cause intracellular material leakage [53], while high-concentration CO2 exposures decrease the activity of some key enzymes, which impacts cell metabolism [54,55]. A study investigating the effect of high concentrations of CO2 on key genes and protein expression was performed by Zhao et al. in 2016 [56]. Carbon dioxide caused reactive nitrogen species accumulation and resulted in inhibiting the transport of intracellular electrons in denitrifying microorganisms [57]. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three different concentrations of CO2 (3.0 g/L, 5.5 g/L, and 7.0 g/L), which are quite common concentrations for mineral water with reduced carbonation, medium sparkling water, and sparkling water in Austria, on the bacterial growth of S. aureus and Ent. faecalis over a storage period of 30 days. S. aureus and Ent. faecalis were chosen as they are contaminants during the filling and capping process in bottled mineral water.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Reference Strains for Inoculation

The reference strains used in this study were obtained from commercially available sources: Ent. faecalis ATCC 6057 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, USA), and were shipped in glass vials.
The reference strains were inoculated with a sterile loop on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) (VWR® International GmbH, Vienna, Austria) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, one colony of each bacterial strain was transferred into sterile Tryptic Soy Broth (VWR® International GmbH, Vienna, Austria) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. For further application, the suspended bacterial medium was centrifuged (3000× g) twice with the addition of sterile NaCl (0.5%) solution (5 mL) each, after removing the liquid parts of the samples between the centrifugation steps and at the end of the procedure. The bacterial count was determined using a DensiCheck Plus (bioMerieux® Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) and found to be 109 colony-forming units (CFUs). A dilution series using NaCl (0.5%) solution was performed to reduce the bacterial count from 109 CFUs to 103 CFUs.

2.2. Preparation of Artificial Contaminated Water Samples

For the examined mineral water samples, the values for pH and conductivity were measured according to the respective standards (ÖNORM EN ISO 10523:2012 [58] and ÖNORM EN 27888:1993 [59], respectively) with a 712 Conductometer (Methrom® Inula GmbH, Vienna, Austria), and a Memotitrator (Metrohm® Inula GmbH, Vienna, Austria).
During the routine filling process of 250 mL glass bottles inside a mineral water bottling plant in Austria, three different concentrations of carbon dioxide containing mineral water were added (40 bottles with 3.0 g/L CO2, 80 bottles with 5.5 g/L CO2, and 40 bottles with 7.0 g/L CO2), shown in Table 1. Before capping the bottles, 80 bottles of mineral water were artificially contaminated with 1 mL of Ent. faecalis suspension and 80 bottles with 1 mL of S. aureus suspension. The bacterial concentrations of the inoculations were ~40 CFU/100 mL of Ent. faecalis for 3 g/L, 5.5 g/L, and 7.0 g/L bottles and for the open bottle; ~30 CFU/100 mL of S. aureus for 3.0 g/L and 240 CFU/100 mL for 7.0 g/L bottles, ~40 CFU/100 mL for the 5.5 g/L bottles and ~20 CFU/100 mL for the open bottles. The capped bottles were immediately transported to the laboratory and stored for further investigation at room temperature (20 °C). The open stored bottles were protected with a loose alumina cap for CO2 release and stored at 20 °C inside a shaded box. Differences in starting concentrations for each bacterial strain were caused by varying days of inoculation and preparation of the suspensions.

2.3. Cultivation of Target Bacteria

For the cultivation of the target bacteria, a new bottle was opened on each respective day (shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). After opening the artificially contaminated bottle, water samples (100 mL) were filtrated through a sterile mixed cellulose ester filter (47 mm diameter and 0.45 µm pore size; EZ-Pak, Merck Chemicals and Life Science GmbH, Vienna, Austria, EZHAWG474) under vacuum, and the filter was subsequently placed on Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep blood (BD® Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria) for S. aureus contaminated samples and on Slanetz and Bartley Agar (VWR® International GmbH, Vienna, Austria) for Ent. faecalis, shown in Figure 1, and incubated for 120 h at 37 °C (every filtration and cultivation step was performed in duplicate). The measurement uncertainty of Ent. faecalis and S. aureus was determined according to DIN EN ISO 19036:2019 (S. aureus: 31.3% and Ent. faecalis: 15.2%) [60]. The CFU counting was performed five times (after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 120 h). To validate the respected bacterial colonies, Gram staining and the latex agglutination test were performed for selected colonies. The Thermo Scientific™ Staphaurex™ Plus Latex Agglutination Test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany) was used to validate the S. aureus colonies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Using the Thermo Scientific™Streptex™ Latex Agglutination Tests (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany), selected Ent. Faecalis colonies were validated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To avoid errors during the sample preparation, a method blank was performed for every experiment with autoclaved distilled water.

2.4. Gram Staining

Gram staining was performed using an IUL PolyStainer (10005300/768) and Gram-colors from Sigma-Aldrich®, Darmstadt, Germany (Gram’s crystal violet solution 1.09218.2500; Lugol’s solution 1.00567.2500 and Gram’s safranine solution 1.09217.2500). Microscopy was realized using a Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany, Axio-imager A1, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed, and charts were generated using SPSS Statistics 28.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). To show the relationship between the decrease in samples and time, a Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed. To assess the differences between the samples with different CO2 concentrations, the log-rank tests were calculated. For Ent. faecalis and S. aureus, we considered a cut-off value of CFU < 2.

3. Results

Analysis of the pH and electrical conductivity showed that the non-carbonated mineral water, obtained from the filling company in a glass bottle, had an electrical conductivity of 2024 ± 68 µS/cm and a pH value of 6.4 ± 0.2. The addition of CO2 to the mineral water changed the pH to 5.9 ± 0.1 for 3.0 g/L CO2, pH 5.6 ± 0.1 for 5.5 g/L CO2, and pH 5.5 ± 0.1 for 7.0 g/L CO2, with no changes for electrical conductivity.
The overall incubation time was 120 h for S. aureus and Ent. faecalis. Colony-forming units were counted after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 120 h, which can be seen in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials. The results for S. aureus colony counts for 3.0 g/L and 7.0 g/L CO2 concentrations are shown in Figure 2. The bottles with 7.0 g/L CO2 were inoculated with a higher load of S. aureus. A steep decrease in CFUs was obtained within three days of storage at this CO2 concentration. The number of CFUs counted from the 3.0 g/L CO2 bottles, over approximately 18 days, shows a count between ~2 CFUs and ~30 CFUs.
The count of CFUs for 5.5 g/L CO2-containing bottles (open and closed storage) is shown in Figure 3. Bottles opened after five hours of storage (5.5 g/L CO2) showed a mean count of 98 CFUs, which is more than double the inoculated bacteria and might be an outlier in this case. After the second day of storage, counts for the CFU drop to a mean of five. The CFU counts derived from open stored bottles were around 11 CFUs on the first two days, which dropped to zero after the 6th day when detecting single colonies for S. aureus on the 13th, 21st, 23rd, 25th, and 27th day. Single CFUs of S. aureus were also detected in samples derived from closed stored bottles (5.5 g/L CO2) on the 8th, 10th, 12th, 14th, and 16th days.
The CFU counts for Ent. faecalis at CO2 concentrations of 3.0 g/L and 7.0 g/L are shown in Figure 4. A decrease in CFUs was observed within six days for non-cultivable bacteria (Ent. faecalis). After the fourth day of storage, only one CFU was observed for the sample derived from 7.0 g/L CO2-containing bottles. The difference in the reduction of CFUs within five days of storage at these two concentrations of CO2 seems to be marginal.
In Figure 5, the CFU counts derived from open and closed stored bottles with a concentration of 5.5 g/L CO2 are shown. The samples from the closed bottles show a decrease in CFUs until the 8th day and drop to zero until the 11th day. The open stored bottles showed an increase of CFUs during the first three days with a slight decrease until the 19th day of storage. A single CFU was observed on day 27.
Statistical analysis was performed to determine the significance between the observed CFU counts at the different concentrations of CO2 (Figure 6). In the case of S. aureus values between 3.0 g/L CO2 and 5.5 g/L CO2 and between 5.5 g/L CO2 and 7.0 g/L CO2 were found to be significant (p < 0.001), according to the Kruskal–Wallis test. The median level of CFUs decreased from 10 CFU/100mL (3.0 g/L CO2) to 7 CFU/100mL (7.0 g/L CO2), whereas the median level for 5.5 g/L CO2 was lower with 1 CFU/100mL.
The statistical analysis of Ent. faecalis showed no significant difference between the different concentrations of CO2 (Figure 7). For the open stored bottles, the median was 4 CFU/100mL.

4. Discussion

Among all contaminants of the water distribution system, such as inorganic and organic compounds, microbial contamination can lead to severe consequences for public health [61,62,63,64,65]. The intake of bacteria during the process of filling and capping bottles may lead to a reduced quality of bottled water, which is of interest to consumers as well as to its producers [29,66]. A study by Bedada et al. showed that molds were present in 15 of 44 examined bottled water brands. In one of the investigated samples, S. aureus and Escherichia coli were observed [42]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates: “Staph food poisoning is a gastrointestinal illness caused by eating foods contaminated with toxins produced by the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus”. The ability of S. aureus to poison food makes it necessary to avoid contamination [67]. Among different bacteria inhabiting acne vulgaris lesions, S. aureus was observed in a number of samples shown in a review on the microbiome of acne vulgaris in Indonesia [11]. Contamination of bottled water with S. aureus during the process of filling may happen from human skin during repairing or adjusting the machinery. The artificial contamination with S. aureus in our study, over a storage period of 30 days, showed a decrease in CFUs for all three levels of CO2 concentration (3.0 g/L, 5.5 g/L, and 7.0 g/L) within 18 days. After this period of time, no cultivable CFUs were detectable on Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep blood (BD® Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria). A study investigating the influence of pH on S. aureus growth indicated that pH values between 5.5 and 7.0 were suitable for S. aureus cultivation, similar to the results for Staphylococcus epidermidis [68], which stands in contrast to the findings by Iyer et al. [3]. In their study, S. aureus was more sensitive to the pH value. Our findings confirm that the survival of S. aureus may not depend on the provided pH value but on the carbonated mineral water on the media itself. Samples from the closed-stored bottles contained cultivable CFUs at all three concentrations for 16 to 18 days. In the open stored bottles with CO2, bubbling out over time, cultivable CFUs of S. aureus were detectable for nearly one month. A recently published study showed that S. aureus (68%) and Ent. faecalis (68%) are present in household water storage tanks in Lebanon [69]. In 2005, Raj described the influence of storage temperature on bacterial growth in open stored bottled water. He concluded that the storage temperature has an enormous influence on bacterial counts [70]. Watanabe et al. examined the influence of the storage temperature of unfinished beverages (e.g., mineral water) on yeast, molds, and bacterial growth. The growth (< 3 log CFU) of Ent. faecalis and two other cocci in mineral water were described as not significant [71]. In our study, concentrations of 3.0 g/L CO2 and higher reduced the number of cultivable CFUs from approximately 40 on the first day to zero after the 13th day. Single CFUs were detected until the 13th day of storage in the closed stored bottles. A dependence of bacterial growth and pH value for Ent. faecalis in a highly alkaline environment was shown in a study by McHugh et al. [72]. A low pH environment may induce damage in the bacterial membrane, and/or nucleic acids and may lead to enzyme misfolding or denaturation [73]. Zhang et al. indicate that the molecular pathways of Ent. faecalis remain largely unknown [74]. Isolates of Ent. faecalis from healthy Chinese infants were found to survive at pH 5.0, in 7.0% NaCl, and in 3% bile salt for 20 h [75]. The exposure of Ent. faecalis in bottled carbonated mineral water with pH values from 5.4 to 6.4, over a period of many days, seems to reduce the ability to grow on Slanetz and Bartley Agar. The effect of pressurized CO2 on Ent. faecalis in different media was examined by Erkmen in 2000. The reduction in the pH value during the procedure of carbonation was described as well as the reduction in bacterial load at temperatures above 35 °C [76]. Storage temperatures above 35 °C combined with high CO2 pressure may reduce bacterial loads of Ent. faecalis faster than with the temperatures of 20 °C described in our study. The slower decrease in CFUs (Ent. faecalis) derived from samples from the open stored bottles can be described with the release of CO2 from the water and potentially raising pH values during this process. The sample design (CO2 concentrations, storage temperature, nutrient-poor water (total organic carbon <1.0 mg/L), etc.,) described in our study meets the conditions of production, distribution, disposal, and household storage of bottled carbonated mineral water. The findings of this study suggest that bottled carbonated mineral water with at least a concentration of 3.0 g/L CO2 and stored over a period of 30 days in glass bottles present no cultivable CFUs for S. aureus and Ent. faecalis. However, proper disinfection of all machinery and used glass bottles cannot be replaced, which ensures that all hygienic and technical standards are met. The consumer’s safety should be the most important aim despite the costs of additional treatments. Further studies including more pathogenic and facultative pathogenic microorganisms should be performed to investigate their behavior under the described conditions. According to the World Health Organization, microbial contamination of drinking water (tap water and bottled water) and irrigation water leads to risks to public health [77]. The addition of at least 3.0 g/L CO2 to bottled mineral water, a low-cost procedure, to assure a safe water supply should be considered in regions with problems concerning microbial contamination. The addition of CO2 should not be the only procedure executed to circumvent the problem of bacterial contamination in bottled water. Many questions regarding other pathogenic bacteria and the properties of fungal contamination stay unanswered. Future works should give attention to the behavior of Gram-negative bacteria and fungi under the described conditions.

5. Conclusions

During a period of 30 days, carbonated (3.0 g/L CO2, 5.5 g/L CO2, and 7.0 g/L CO2) bottled mineral water samples, which were artificially contaminated with either S. aureus or Ent. faecalis, two Gram-positive bacteria, were examined for bacterial growth. A decrease in the number of CFUs was observed for all samples during the investigation period. The pH value dependence of the examined bacterial strains can describe the observed decrease in CFUs over several days of storage. Further investigations for other microorganisms that can act as contaminants should be made in the future, to complete the whole picture of bottled water contaminant behaviors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology12030432/s1, Table S1: Bacterial counts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.; methodology, M.S.; software, P.O.-K.; formal analysis, S.P. and P.O.-K.; investigation, R.S. and S.P.; data curation, M.S. and P.O.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S., F.F.R. and D.H.; visualization, M.S.; supervision, F.F.R. and D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Waltraud Mayrhofer for participation in this study and Anna Schalli for the creation of the graphical abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Österreichisches Lebensmittelbuch (ÖLMB) Kapitel B17 Abgefüllte Wässer. Available online: https://www.verbrauchergesundheit.gv.at/Lebensmittel/buch/codex/B17_Abgefuellte_Waesser.pdf?8ksx23 (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  2. Mineral und Quellwasserverordnung. Available online: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung/Bundesnormen/20000003/Mineralwasser-%20und%20Quellwasserverordnung%2c%20Fassung%20vom%2002.01.2023.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  3. Iyer, V.; Raut, J.; Dasgupta, A. Impact of pH on growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Persson, M.; Svenarud, P.; Flock, J.I.; van der Linden, J. Carbon dioxide inhibits the growth rate of Staphylococcus aureus at body temperature. Surg. Endosc. 2005, 19, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wibowo, J.T.; Bayu, A.; Aryati, W.D.; Fernandes, C.; Yanuar, A.; Kijjoa, A.; Putra, M.Y. Secondary Metabolites from Marine-Derived Bacteria with Antibiotic and Antibiofilm Activities against Drug-Resistant Pathogens. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, S.; Liu, D. A Visible Light-Induced and ROS-Dependent Method for the Rapid Formation of a MOF Composite Membrane with Antibacterial Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ambreen, J.; Haleem, A.; Shah, A.A.; Mushtaq, F.; Siddiq, M.; Bhatti, M.A.; Shah Bukhari, S.N.U.; Chandio, A.D.; Mahdi, W.A.; Alshehri, S. Facile Synthesis and Fabrication of NIPAM-Based Cryogels for Environmental Remediation. Gels 2023, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, J.; Yin, Y.; Hu, S.; Wang, G.; Tong, Y.; Zen, M.; Liang, Z.; Li, M.; Yan, R.; Wang, Y. Green Synthesis of Anti-bacterial Nano Silver by Polysaccharide from Bletilla Striata. Inorganics 2023, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Altran Costa, B.; Abuçafy, M.P.; Barbosa, T.W.L.; da Silva, B.L.; Fulindi, R.B.; Isquibola, G.; da Costa, P.I.; Chiavacci, L.A. ZnO@ZIF-8 Nanoparticles as Nanocarrier of Ciprofloxacin for Antimicrobial Activity. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matos, G.M.; Garcia-Teodoro, B.; Martins, C.P.; Schmitt, P.; Guzmán, F.; de Freitas, A.C.O.; Stoco, P.H.; Ferreira, F.A.; Stadnik, M.J.; Robl, D.; et al. Antimicrobial Spectrum of Activity and Mechanism of Action of Linear Alpha-Helical Peptides Inspired by Shrimp Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factors. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Legiawati, L.; Halim, P.A.; Fitriani, M.; Hikmahrachim, H.G.; Lim, H.W. Microbiomes in Acne Vulgaris and Their Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Indonesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghataty, D.S.; Amer, R.I.; Amer, M.A.; Abdel Rahman, M.F.; Shamma, R.N. Green Synthesis of Highly Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Bovine Serum Albumin for Linezolid Drug Delivery as Potential Wound Healing Biomaterial: Bio-Synergistic Approach, Antibacterial Activity, and In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moreira, L.; Agostinho, P.; Morais, P.V.; da Costa, M.S. Survival of allochthonous bacteria in still mineral water bottled in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and glass. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1994, 77, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Mechmechani, S.; Gharsallaoui, A.; Karam, L.; EL Omari, K.; Fadel, A.; Hamze, M.; Chihib, N.-E. Pepsin and Trypsin Treatment Combined with Carvacrol: An Efficient Strategy to Fight Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aung, M.S.; Urushibara, N.; Kawaguchiya, M.; Ohashi, N.; Hirose, M.; Kudo, K.; Tsukamoto, N.; Ito, M.; Kobayashi, N. Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Factors, and Genotypes of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Clinical Isolates in Northern Japan: Identification of optrA in ST480 E. faecalis. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reardon, S. WHO warns against ‘post-antibiotic’ era. Nature 2014, 244, 1356–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adam Mohamed, S.; Nyerere, A.; Sang, W.K.; Ngayo, M. Bottled water brands are contaminated with multidrug resistant bacteria in Nairobi, Kenya. F1000Research 2020, 9, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rompré, A.; Servais, P.; Baudart, J.; de-Roubin, M.R.; Laurent, P. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: Current methods and emerging approaches. J. Microbiol. Methods 2002, 49, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schalli, M.; Inwinkl, S.M.; Platzer, S.; Baumert, R.; Reinthaler, F.F.; Ofner-Kopeinig, P.; Haas, D. Cefsulodin and Vancomycin: A Supplement for Chromogenic Coliform Agar for Detection of Escherichia coli and Coliform Bacteria from Different Water Sources. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nurliyana, M.R.; Sahdan, M.Z.; Wibowo, K.M.; Muslihati, A.; Saim, H.; Ahmad, S.A.; Sari, Y.; Mansor, Z. The Detection Method of Escherichia coli in Water Resources: A Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 995, 012065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Brumfield, K.D.; Hasan, N.A.; Leddy, M.B.; Cotruvo, J.A.; Rashed, S.M.; Colwell, R.R.; Huq, A. A comparative analysis of drinking water employing metagenomics. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Khan, F.M.; Gupta, R.; Sekhri, S. A convolutional neural network approach for detection of E. coli bacteria in water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 60778–60786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manohar, S.M.; Shah, P.; Nair, A. Flow cytometry: Principles, applications and recent advances. Bioanalysis 2021, 3, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Manaia, C.M.; Nunes, O.C.; Morais, P.V.; da Costa, M.S. Heterotrophic plate counts and the isolation of bacteria from mineral waters on selective and enrichment media. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1990, 69, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Mohammadi Kouchesfahani, M.; Alimohammadi, M.; Nabizadeh Nodehi, R.; Aslani, H.; Rezaie, S.; Asadian, S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Heterotrophic Bacteria Count in Bottled Waters in Iran. Iran. J. Public Health 2015, 44, 1514–1519. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Reasoner, D.J. Heterotrophic plate count methodology in the United States. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 92, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Duranceau, S.J.; Emerson, H.P.; Wilder, R.J. Impact of bottled water storage duration and location on bacteriological quality. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2012, 22, 543–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Venieri, D.; Vantarakis, A.; Komninou, G.; Papapetropoulou, M. Microbiological evaluation of bottled non-carbonated (“still”) water from domestic brands in Greece. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 107, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Florina, R.; Calin, A.; Raluca, M. Physico-Chemical and Microbiological Differences between Mains and Bottled Water, in an Area in the Central Area of Romania. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Santos, G.A.C.; Dropa, M.; Rocha, S.M.; Peternella, F.A.S.; Razzolini, M.T.P. Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in drinking water fountains in urban parks. J. Water Health 2020, 18, 654–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. LeChevallier, M.W.; Seidler, R.J. Staphylococcus aureus in rural drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 39, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Adesoji, A.T.; Onuh, J.P.; Bagu, J.; Itohan, S.A. Prevalence and antibiogram study of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical and selected drinking water of Dutsin-Ma, Katsina state, Nigeria. Afr. Health Sci. 2019, 19, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, T.S.; Choong, M.Y.; Wu, S.F.; Chen, K.J. Irrigating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Colonized and infected chronic wounds. Int. Wound J. 2013, 10, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nagoba, B.S.; Selkar, S.P.; Mule, J.B. Irrigating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-colonised and -infected chronic wounds—Why use tap water? Int. Wound J. 2015, 12, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paudel, S.; Bagale, K.; Patel, S.; Kooyers, N.J.; Kulkarni, R. Human Urine Alters Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Virulence and Transcriptome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0074421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Akiyama, H.; Yamasaki, O.; Tada, J.; Kubota, K.; Arata, J. Antimicrobial effects of acidic hot-spring water on Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from atopic dermatitis patients. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2000, 24, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, H.J.; Tango, C.N.; Chelliah, R.; Oh, D.H. Sanitization Efficacy of Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water against pure cultures of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus spores, in Comparison with Different Water Hardness. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Planchon, S.; Gaillard-Martinie, B.; Dordet-Frisoni, E.; Bellon-Fontaine, M.N.; Leroy, S.; Labadie, J.; Hébraud, M.; Talon, R. Formation of biofilm by Staphylococcus xylosus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 109, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Da Silva Meira, Q.G.; de Medeiros Barbosa, I.; Athayde, A.J.A.A.; de Siqueira-Júnior, J.P.; de Souza, E.L. Influence of temperature and surface kind on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food-contact surfaces and sensitivity to sanitizers. Food Contr. 2012, 25, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tango, C.N.; Akkermans, S.; Hussain, M.S.; Khan, I.; Van Impe, J.; Jin, Y.G.; Oh, D.H. Modeling the effect of pH, water activity, and ethanol concentration on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valero, A.; Pérez-Rodríguez, F.; Carrasco, E.; Fuentes-Alventosa, J.M.; García-Gimeno, R.M.; Zurera, G. Modelling the growth boundaries of Staphylococcus aureus: Effect of temperature, pH and water activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 133, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bedada, T.L.; Dera, F.A.; Edicho, R.M.; Gebre, S.G.; Asefa, Y.B.; Sima, W.G.; Maheder, R.F.; Negassi, T.Y.; Biegna, A.G. Mycological and Bacteriological Quality and Safety of Bottled Water in Ethiopia. Open Microbiol. J. 2018, 12, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Igbeneghu, O.A.; Lamikanra, A. The bacteriological quality of different brands of bottled water available to consumers in Ile-Ife, south-western Nigeria. BMC Res. Notes 2014, 7, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Daniels, J.A.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Rizvi, S.S.H. A Review of Effects of Carbon Dioxide on Microbial Growth and Food Quality. J. Food Prot. 1985, 48, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Williams-Campbell, A.M.; Jay, J.M. Effects of diacetyl and carbon dioxide on spoilage microflora in ground beef. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martin, J.D.; Werner, B.G.; Hotchkiss, J.H. Effects of carbon dioxide on bacterial growth parameters in milk as measured by conductivity. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1932–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, T.; Chen, Y. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on environmental microbes and its mechanisms: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 865–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rousk, J.; Brookes, P.C.; Bååth, E. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. De Beer, D.; Haeckel, M.; Neumann, J.; Wegener, G.; Inagaki, F.; Boetius, A. Saturated CO2 inhibits microbial processes in CO2-vented deep-sea sediments. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 5639–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Garcia-Gonzalez, L.; Geeraerd, A.H.; Spilimbergo, S.; Elst, K.; Van Ginneken, L.; Debevere, J.; Van Impe, J.F.; Devlieghere, F. High pressure carbon dioxide inactivation of microorganisms in foods: The past, the present and the future. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 117, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garcia-Gonzalez, L.; Geeraerd, A.H.; Elst, K.; Van Ginneken, L.; Van Impe, J.F.; Devlieghere, F. Influence of type of microorganism, food ingredients and food properties on high-pressure carbon dioxide inactivation of microorganisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 129, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Garcia-Gonzalez, L.; Geeraerd, A.H.; Mast, J.; Briers, Y.; Elst, K.; Van Ginneken, L.; Van Impe, J.F.; Devlieghere, F. Membrane permeabilization and cellular death of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as induced by high pressure carbon dioxide treatment. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yao, C.; Li, X.; Bi, W.; Jiang, C. Relationship between membrane damage, leakage of intracellular compounds, and inactivation of Escherichia coli treated by pressurized CO2. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, S.R.; Rhee, M.S.; Kim, B.C.; Kim, K.H. Modeling the inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and generic Escherichia coli by supercritical carbon dioxide. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 118, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rastelli, E.; Corinaldesi, C.; Dell’Anno, A.; Amaro, T.; Greco, S.; Lo Martire, M.; Carugati, L.; Queirós, A.M.; Widdicombe, S.; Danovaro, R. CO2 leakage from carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) systems affects organic matter cycling in surface marine sediments. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016, 122, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; An, H.; Hao, Y.; Hu, X.; Liao, X. New Insights into the Formation of Viable but Nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 Induced by High-Pressure CO2. mBio 2016, 7, e00961-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Wan, R.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, X.; Su, Y.; Li, M. Effect of CO2 on Microbial Denitrification via Inhibiting Electron Transport and Consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 9915–9922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. ÖNORM EN ISO 10523; Wasserbeschaffenheit–Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. Austrian Standards Institute: Vienna, Austria, 2012.
  59. ÖNORM EN 27888; Wasserbeschaffenheit–Bestimmung der elektrischen Leitfähigkeit. Österreichisches Normungsinstitut: Vienna, Austria, 1993.
  60. DIN EN ISO 19036; Mikrobiologie der Lebensmittelkette—Feststellung von Messunsicherheiten bei Quantitativen Bestimmungen. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.: Berlin, Germany, 2019.
  61. Levallois, P.; Barn, P.; Valcke, M.; Gauvin, D.; Kosatsky, T. Public Health Consequences of Lead in Drinking Water. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2018, 5, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Schalli, M.; Kogler, B.; Miorini, T.; Gehrer, M.; Reinthaler, F.F. High-Speed Dental Instruments: An Investigation of Protein-Contaminated Dental Handpieces with the Bicinchoninic Acid Assay in Dental Offices in Styria, Austria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Syafrudin, M.; Kristanti, R.A.; Yuniarto, A.; Hadibarata, T.; Rhee, J.; Al-onazi, W.A.; Algarni, T.S.; Almarri, A.H.; Al-Mohaimeed, A.M. Pesticides in Drinking Water—A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Akhbarizadeh, R.; Dobaradaran, S.; Schmidt, T.C.; Nabipour, I.; Spitz, J. Worldwide bottled water occurrence of emerging contaminants: A review of the recent scientific literature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schalli, M.; Weber, P.; Nasseri, S.A.; Gomez, A.T.; Müller, P.; Stütz, A.E.; Withers, S.G.; Wolfsgruber, A.; Wrodnigg, T.M. Biologically active branched-chain aminocyclopentane tetraols from d-galactose. Monatsh. Chem. 2019, 150, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Allen, M.J.; Edberg, S.C.; Clancy, J.L.; Hrudey, S.E. Drinking water microbial myths. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 41, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Staphylococcal (Staph) Food Poisoning. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/diseases/staphylococcal.html (accessed on 23 January 2023).
  68. Korting, H.C.; Lukacs, A.; Vogt, N.; Urban, J.; Ehret, W.; Ruckdeschel, G. Influence of the pH-value on the growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Propionibacterium acnes in continuous culture. Zentralbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 1992, 193, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Borjac, J.; Zeino, W.; Matar, A.; Khawaja, S.; Merheb, M.; Matar, R. Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Domestic Water Storage Tanks in Sidon, Lebanon. Water 2023, 15, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raj, S.D. Bottled water: How safe is it? Water Environ. Res. 2005, 77, 3013–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Watanabe, M.; Ohnishi, T.; Araki, E.; Kanda, T.; Tomita, A.; Ozawa, K.; Goto, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Konuma, H.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Characteristics of bacterial and fungal growth in plastic bottled beverages under a consuming condition model. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2014, 49, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. McHugh, C.P.; Zhang, P.; Michalek, S.; Eleazer, P.D. pH required to kill Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. J. Endod. 2004, 30, 218–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Salze, M.; Giard, J.C.; Riboulet-Bisson, E.; Hain, T.; Rincé, A.; Muller, C. Identification of the general stress stimulon related to colonization in Enterococcus faecalis. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, L.; Song, D.; Wu, Z. Transcriptome analysis of Cyclocarya paliurus flavonoids regulation of differently expressed genes in Enterococcus faecalis under low pH stress. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 2147–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, J.; Da, R.; Tuo, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wei, J.; Jiang, K.; Lv, J.; Adediji, O.M.; Han, B. Probiotic and Safety Properties Screening of Enterococcus faecalis from Healthy Chinese Infants. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Erkman, O. Antimicrobial effect of pressurised carbondioxide on Enterococcus faecalis in physiological saline and foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH). Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 23 January 2023).
Figure 1. Staphylococcus aureus colonies on Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep blood (left) and Ent. Faecalis colonies on Slanetz and Bartley Agar (right).
Figure 1. Staphylococcus aureus colonies on Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep blood (left) and Ent. Faecalis colonies on Slanetz and Bartley Agar (right).
Biology 12 00432 g001
Figure 2. Mean values of colony-forming units (S. aureus) over a period of 30 days for closed bottles (left: 3.0 g/L CO2; right: 7.0 g/L CO2).
Figure 2. Mean values of colony-forming units (S. aureus) over a period of 30 days for closed bottles (left: 3.0 g/L CO2; right: 7.0 g/L CO2).
Biology 12 00432 g002
Figure 3. Mean values of colony forming units (S. aureus) over a period of 30 days for closed and open bottles (left: 5.5 g/L CO2 closed bottle; right: 5.5 g/L CO2 open bottle).
Figure 3. Mean values of colony forming units (S. aureus) over a period of 30 days for closed and open bottles (left: 5.5 g/L CO2 closed bottle; right: 5.5 g/L CO2 open bottle).
Biology 12 00432 g003
Figure 4. Mean values of colony units (Ent. faecalis) over a period of 30 days for closed bottles (left: 3.0 g/L CO2; right: 7.0 g/L CO2).
Figure 4. Mean values of colony units (Ent. faecalis) over a period of 30 days for closed bottles (left: 3.0 g/L CO2; right: 7.0 g/L CO2).
Biology 12 00432 g004
Figure 5. Mean values of colony forming units (Ent. faecalis) over a period of 30 days for closed and open bottles (left: 5.5 g/L CO2 closed bottle; right: 5.5 g/L CO2 open bottle).
Figure 5. Mean values of colony forming units (Ent. faecalis) over a period of 30 days for closed and open bottles (left: 5.5 g/L CO2 closed bottle; right: 5.5 g/L CO2 open bottle).
Biology 12 00432 g005
Figure 6. Time to the event (CFU falls below 2) for different CO2 concentrations of CFUs from S. aureus for closed and open stored bottles.
Figure 6. Time to the event (CFU falls below 2) for different CO2 concentrations of CFUs from S. aureus for closed and open stored bottles.
Biology 12 00432 g006
Figure 7. Time to event (CFU falls below 2) for different CO2 concentrations of CFUs from Ent. faecalis for closed and open stored bottles.
Figure 7. Time to event (CFU falls below 2) for different CO2 concentrations of CFUs from Ent. faecalis for closed and open stored bottles.
Biology 12 00432 g007
Table 1. Contaminated mineral water bottles with different concentrations of CO2.
Table 1. Contaminated mineral water bottles with different concentrations of CO2.
Number of Bottles (250 mL)Concentration of CO2 (g/L)Bacterial Strain
203.0Ent. faecalis ATCC 6057
405.5Ent. faecalis ATCC 6057
207.0Ent. faecalis ATCC 6057
203.0S. aureus ATCC 25923
405.5S. aureus ATCC 25923
207.0S. aureus ATCC 25923
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schalli, M.; Platzer, S.; Schmutz, R.; Ofner-Kopeinig, P.; Reinthaler, F.F.; Haas, D. Dissolved Carbon Dioxide: The Lifespan of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis in Bottled Carbonated Mineral Water. Biology 2023, 12, 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030432

AMA Style

Schalli M, Platzer S, Schmutz R, Ofner-Kopeinig P, Reinthaler FF, Haas D. Dissolved Carbon Dioxide: The Lifespan of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis in Bottled Carbonated Mineral Water. Biology. 2023; 12(3):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schalli, Michael, Sabine Platzer, Rainer Schmutz, Petra Ofner-Kopeinig, Franz F. Reinthaler, and Doris Haas. 2023. "Dissolved Carbon Dioxide: The Lifespan of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis in Bottled Carbonated Mineral Water" Biology 12, no. 3: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop