Next Article in Journal
A Unified Model of Age-Related Cardiovascular Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Hip Muscles Strength in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients Treated by Arthroscopy or Surgical Hip Dislocation: A Retrospective Exploratory Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review

1
Clinical Research Development Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom 3719964797, Iran
2
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 982166757001, Iran
3
Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 982188220065, Iran
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(12), 1767; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121767
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a rare disease and manifests in different organs. The exact mechanism of AAV is not fully understood, but it is speculated that it is induced by autoantibody production against proteinase-3 and myeloperoxidase. Patients diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis are challenging to manage and experience several relapses during and after treatment. This systematic review represents the efficacy and safety profile of rituximab in AAV patients and provides evidence that rituximab can be considered the treatment of choice for AAV patients, especially for challenging patients with refractory releases.

Abstract

Background and aim: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a rare multisystem autoimmune disease developed by autoantibody production against human neutrophilic granulocytes, including proteinase-3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). The management of AAV patients is difficult due to the multiorgan involvement, high rate of relapse, and complications of immunosuppressive agents that make it challenging. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) therapy in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) subtypes. Method: The PubMed/Medline database was searched for any studies related to RTX therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA and MPA subtypes), from inception to 1 August 2022, and proceeded in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Our search resulted in 1082 initial records. After the elimination of review papers, irrelevant studies, and non-English records, 223 articles were included, and the data related to the efficacy and safety of RTX therapy were extracted. Several randomized and non-randomized studies showed that RTX is an effective treatment option for patients with AAV. Most of the studies showed the very effective effect of RTX in controlling disease in AAV patients, including pediatrics, adults, and elderlies, although RTX cannot completely prevent relapse. However, maintenance therapy helps delay the disease’s relapse and causes sustained remission. Not only the licensed dose (375 mg/m2 intravenous per week for 4 weeks) could induce disease remission, but studies also showed that a single infusion of RTX could be effective. Although RTX could resolve many rare manifestations in AAV patients, there are few reports showing treatment failure. Additionally, few sudies have reported the unexpeted worsening of the disease after RTX administration. Generally, RTX is relatively safe compared to conventional therapies, but some serious adverse effects, mainly infections, cytopenia, hypogammaglobinemia, malignancy, and hypersensitivity have been reported. Conclusions: RTX is an effective and relatively safe therapeutic option for AAV. Studies on the evaluation of the safety profiles of RTX and the prevention of severe RTX-related side effects in AAV patients are required.

1. Introduction

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of autoimmune diseases characterized by the inflammation of small- to medium-sized blood vessels. Three major subgroups are granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), known as Wegener’s granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA; also known as Churg–Strauss syndrome), which is characterized as a lack of tolerance to the main proteins of neutrophil granule, including proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO) [1]. It is estimated that 46–184 people in Europe are diagnosed with AAV annually, with incidence rates ranging from 2.1 to 14.4 for GPA, 2.4–10.1 for MPA, and 0.5–3.7 for EGPA, correspondingly [2]. People over the age of 60 and males are more likely to be diagnosed with AAV [3]. Five-year survival rates for GPA, MPA, and EGPA were estimated between 74% and 91%, 45% to 76%, and 60% to 97%, consecutively [4].
The necrotizing inflammation of small- to medium-sized blood vessels is the hallmark of AAV, leading to notable diverse clinical presentations [5]. Serum PR3 (PR3-ANCA) or MPO (MPO-ANCA), often correlated with the primary syndromic AAV presentations, may be used clinically to demonstrate autoimmunity. It is typical for GPA and MPA to impact capillaries in the upper and lower respiratory tracts and the renal tract. In most cases, AAV patients face life-threatening or organ-threatening illnesses; however, less severe presentations are possible. PR3-ANCA is the most common type of ANCA associated with GPA, and the disease’s clinical features include sinonasal disease, lower respiratory tract involvement, and glomerulonephritis. MPA is often linked to MPO-ANCA, and its symptoms include renal impairment and some of GPA’s manifestations but without the granulomatous inflammation that characterizes GPA [1]. The typical renal glomerular involvement of GPA patients is histologically similar to that observed in MPA.
Moreover, Wegener’s syndrome affects the other organs, including respiratory disease, and skin, eye, and joint involvement are different parts of the clinical presentation of Wegner and are included in the diagnoses. Despite microscopic polyangiitis, Wegener’s syndrome lesions are typically granulomatous. Some studies have proposed that MPO-AAV and PR3-AAV are disparate due to the different epidemiology, prognosis, and clinical features, and patients with PR3-AAV had a greater risk of relapse than MPO-AAV patients [6]. Patients in the MPO-AAV group were older and less likely than those in the PR3-AAV group to have ear, nose, and throat (ENT) or ophthalmic involvement. Moreover, blood creatinine and proteinuria were more prominent in MPO-AAV patients. The GPA and MPA degenerative alterations in the glomeruli and tubulointerstitia were indistinguishable. Patients with MPO-AAV had considerably more risk of end-stage renal disease than those with PR3-AAV [7].
The regular management of AAV includes an induction phase of 3–6 months to rapidly decrease inflammation and avoid persistent organ damage, followed by a prolonged maintenance phase after the induction of remission. After two years, treatment is discontinued in patients with sustained remission [8]. Although existing induction regimens are efficient in inducing remission in 70–90% of patients, they are accompanied by high levels of side effects, particularly in older patients and those with lung damage [9,10]. Future maintenance treatment is utilized to minimize relapses; nevertheless, relapses can develop in 50% of patients within five years from their first remission [11]. The standard treatment for newly diagnosed AAV patients comprises high-dose glucocorticoids (GC) with either cyclophosphamide (CYC) or rituximab [8]. Methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are additional therapies for people with non-threatening conditions. Although MTX and MMF successfully induce remission, they are more associated with a risk of recurrence than CYC or rituximab (RTX) treatment [12].
RTX is a monoclonal antibody that depletes CD20+ B cells, which can last for even more than 24 weeks. After FDA approval in 2011, RTX opened up a new avenue to treat AAV patients It was licensed at a dosage of 375 mg/m2/week for four weeks plus glucocorticoids [13]. Due to the increasing trend of RTX therapy, considered an alternative to CYC, here, in this review, we sought to investigate the aspects of RTX therapy in AAV patients, mainly GPA and MPA, to elucidate the beneficial and adverse effects of RTX and provide a clinical direction for the management of AAV patients.

2. Method

This systematic review was prepared in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [14]. EGPA was excluded from the present study since the EGPA Consensus Task Force recommendation and most clinical trials noted that EGPA is a distinct entity and should be diagnosed and managed separately [15]. Therefore, we limited the AAV patients to patients with MPA and GPA. Due to the limitation regarding the number of searched databases and the number of included studies, as well as not conducting a quality assessment process of included studies, the registration code of PROSPERO was not achievable.

2.1. Search Strategy

The PubMed/Medline database was searched for any studies related to RTX therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis from inception to 1 August 2022, using the keywords “rituximab”, “AAV”, “GPA”, “anti-CD20”, and “MPA with appropriate Boolean operators (AND/OR/NOT), searching in the titles, abstracts, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The search strategy was ((“Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis” (Mesh)) OR (“Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis” (Mesh)) OR (“Microscopic Polyangiitis” (Mesh)) OR (granulomatosis Wegener (Title/Abstract)) OR (Wegener’s granulomatosis (Title/Abstract)) OR (granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Title/Abstract)) OR (ANCA associated vasculitis (Title/Abstract)) OR (microscopic poly angiitis (Title/Abstract)) OR (PR3-AAV (Title/Abstract)) OR (MPO-AAV (Title/Abstract))) AND ((rituximab (Title/Abstract)) OR (anti-CD20 (Title/Abstract))). Since the major database for medical papers is PubMed, and there are also limitations in including papers (number of references), we only searched in the PubMed/Medline database. The result of the systematic search was completed by manually adding potential articles by checking the references of references and the results of Google Scholar, using “rituximab”, “ANCA-associated vasculitis”, “granulomatosis with polyangiitis”, and “microscopic polyangiitis”. Among the studies, only those with novel data have been selected. Regarding those repetitive findings, only those with more power have been considered for discussion. Among the case reports, we only discussed those studies with unique findings.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All of the original articles that addressed the safety and efficacy of rituximab in AAV were included in the present systematic review. The exclusion criteria were:
  • Studies on the eosinophilic granulomatous with polyangiitis (EGPA);
  • Non-English studies;
  • Any articles without clinical observations, such as review articles, conference abstracts, letters to the editor, and short communications.

2.3. Study Selection Process

The results of the systematic search were imported into the EndNote 20 software. Two reviewers (MA. H, and S. T) independently reviewed the retrieved studies and selected the eligible articles in a two-step process by screening the title and abstract. The full texts of screened studies were reviewed in the full-text assessment step by the same two reviewers and the final articles were included. The disagreements in the title/abstract and full-text assessment were resolved by discussion between the two reviewers.

2.4. Data Extraction

The full texts of included studies were investigated by two reviewers (M. Z and S. HR) and the data were inserted into a predesigned Microsoft Word© worksheet. The data included the first author, year of publication, country, type of study, number of patients, sex of patients, BVAS score before rituximab therapy (BVAS stands for “Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score”, a scoring system to assess disease activity in patients with systemic vasculitis), dose of rituximab, clinical manifestation of AAV, induction or remission regimen of rituximab, and type of remission (complete remission, partial remission, not remission). The investigated data were rechecked by a third reviewer (MA. H) and overlooked data were added to the worksheet.

2.5. Data Synthesis

A narrative synthesis of extracted data without meta-analysis was carried out by two reviewers (MA. H and SM. P) and summarized in the tables. Statistical analysis was not conducted due to the diversity of the characteristics of studies and incomplete reports of effect size. Therefore, the effects of the studies were estimated by using the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews guideline designed by Campbell et al. [16] to facilitate the reporting of the synthesized data.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results and Studies’ Characteristics

From 1082 initial records, after excluding studies with irrelevant titles (n = 747), 336 records were considered for full-text assessment. Review articles (n = 29), book chapters (n = 6), studies on eosinophilic granulomatous with polyangiitis (n = 70), overlap syndrome with other autoimmune diseases (n = 5), and those without full texts available (n = 3) were excluded from the study. Thereafter, extracted data from 223 included studies were categorized into two main categories, efficacy and safety. The selection process, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, is shown in Figure 1.
In total, 10 randomized clinical trials (RCT), 61 non-randomized cohorts, and 85 case reports were included. All of the RCTs registered in the US or Europe registry of clinical trials are summarized in Table 1. A summary of the non-randomized studies regarding the safety and efficacy of RTX therapy in AAV patients is also shown in Table 2. Case reports with similar findings without additional data are not used for discussion. Meanwhile, reports of the unsuccessful treatment of AAV patients with RTX and resolving rare manifestations of AAV patients by RTX are debated separately to highlight the points of RTX therapy. The included studies were discussed according to the subgroups of the regimens of RTX therapy, age specificity, and organ involvement. Findings addressing the adverse events of RTX therapy in AAV patients are summarized in Table 3, and the description of such complications is brought into context.

3.2. Efficacy Reports Based on Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies

Generally, there is consensus regarding the high efficacy of RTX for the treatment of AAV patients. However, studies have shed light on several critical points that bear discussing. Following the promising result of induction RTX therapy, it is increasingly being used as a maintenance option for AAV patients. In this section, the most important findings from randomized studies, non-randomized studies, and case reports are discussed.

3.2.1. Randomized Studies

The randomized clinical trials registered in the U.S database (ClinicalTrials.gov, accessed on 24 October 2022) and European clinical trial registry (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, accessed on 24 October 2022) were established to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of RTX in AAV patients (summarized in Table 1). The first randomized clinical trial (RCT) study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in comparison to intravenous CYC.
The RITUXVAS trial (ISRCTN 28528813) was conducted on 44 AAV patients with renal involvement comparing two regimens, including combined 375 mg/m2 RTX, 2 × 15 mg/kg CYC, and GCs without maintenance therapy, and 3 to 6 months’ administration of CYC followed by azathioprine (AZA). The RITUXVAS trial demonstrated that RTX was not superior to CYC for severe AAVs; both were associated with a sustained remission rate and no significant difference in early severe adverse events during 12 months of follow-up [17]. Another study (ISRCTN28528813) was conducted on RITUXVAS trial patients to investigate the long-term outcome of RTX therapy in AAV patients with renal disease. Within 24 months, the rates of the compound outcome of death, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and relapse were not significantly different between RTX and CYC [18]. The RAVE trial (NCT00104299) also reported the non-inferiority of four infusions of 375 mg/m2/weekly RTX to daily CYC (2 g/kg) for the induction of remission in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis [19]. Such indifference was also confirmed by a subgroup analysis of a RAVE trial regarding 102 of 197 AAV patients with renal involvement [20]. Over 18 months, four doses of 375 mg/m2/w RTX with GCs were compared to 18-month consecutive therapy with 2 mg/kg/d CYC, which was replaced by 2 mg/kg/d AZA (3–6 months after CYC usage) plus GCs, and were not significantly different in renal function outcomes [20]. Specks et al. [21] also showed that four weekly doses of 375 mg/m2/w RTX have similar efficacy compared to the regimen including CYC (2 g/d) for 3–6 months and then azathioprine (2 g/d) for a total of 18 months. Therefore, not only is RTX not inferior to CYC in terms of the induction of remission, but patients might also benefit from long-term treatment with RTX due to decreasing the need for maintenance immunosuppression and also reduced cumulative exposure to CYC.
Some other RCTs were designed to compare the efficacy and safety of RTX to other immunosuppressive agents. The RITAZAREM (NCT01697267) is another clinical trial that was conducted on active AAV patients older than 15 years who received RTX and GCs for the induction of remission. It was shown that RTX was superior to oral AZA in terms of relapse prevention in patients who experienced relapse during at least 36 months of follow-up [22]. The SCOUT trial (NCT02169219) was a pilot clinical trial on 20 patients to investigate the efficacy of combining the RTX and an 8-week GCs regime in AAV patients to induce and maintain remission. Newly diagnosed MPA or GPA patients or relapsed patients with BVAS > 3, aged 18 to 85 years old, were recruited. As a result, short-course prednisolone combined with RTX achieved complete remission (CR) within 6 months similar to the RAVE trial with a lesser adverse event; however, the relapse rate was greater than in the RAVE trial [23].
The triple MAINRITSAN trials were conducted in France to investigate the efficacy of different regimens in the remission of AAV patients. The MAINRITSAN trial (NCT00748644) was conducted on 115 newly diagnosed or relapsed AAV patients, who were treated with either AZA (2 mg/kg/d) or 500 mg RTX (on days 0 and 14, and then on months 6, 12, and 18) as maintenance treatment following induction of remission by CYC-GCs. Serious relapse occurred in 20% of patients in the AZA group and 5% of the RTX group during 28 months of follow-up [24]. Moreover, a health assessment of AAV patients in MAINRITSAN trials showed a better quality of life in the RTX group compared to the AZA group [25]. Following 60 months follow-up of MAINRITSAN trial patients, it was shown that the rate of prolonged remission in the RTX group was superior to the AZA group (71.9% vs. 49.4%, respectively) [26].
Table 1. Clinical Trials of rituximab therapy in AAV patients.
Table 1. Clinical Trials of rituximab therapy in AAV patients.
No.RCT NameCountryTherapeutic AssessmentRTX DosageNumber of PatientsAge SexOutcomeStatusRef.
1RITUXVASUKRTX, CYC375 mg/BSA4467.7523M/21FRTX is not superior to CYCCompleted [17]
2RAVEUS, The NetherlandsRTX, CYC375 mg/BSA19752.7598F/99MRTX is not inferior to CYCCompleted[19]
3RITUXVAS *UKRTX plus CYC and GCs, CYC plus AZA375 mg/BSA44NGNGNo significant difference between RTX plus CYC and CYC/AZACompleted[18]
4RAVE * USRTX/GC, CYC/AZA375 mg/BSA1025548F/54MA single course of RTX is similar to conventional therapiesCompleted[20]
5RITAZAREMUS, Europe, Australia, MexicoRTX, AZA1 g17057.8 ± 14.586F/84MRTX is superior to AZA in the prevention of relapseCompleted[22]
6SCOUTUSRTX, GCs375 mg/BSA/w2061.57F/13MCombined RTX and GCs resulted in the same CR as the RAVE trialCompleted[23]
7MAINRITSANFranceRTX, AZA500 mg11555 ± 1350F/65MMore serious relapse in AZA than RTXCompleted[24]
8MAINRITSAN2FranceRTX, RTX500 mg16260.568F/94MNo difference between adjusted infusion and organized infusion of RTXCompleted[27]
9MAINRITSAN3FranceRTX, Placebo500 mg biannual9763.934F/63MLower rate of relapse in RTX compared to placeboCompleted[28]
10MAINTANCAVASUSRTX2 × 1 g based on B cell repopulation200---Recruiting-
11LoVASJapanRTX+ low dose GC, RTX+ high dose GCs375 mg/BSA14073.580F/54MNo significant difference between high-dose and low-dose GCs plus RTX regimensActive[29]
12ENDURRANCE-1The NetherlandsRTX plus CYC, RTX2 × 1 g47--No results availableActive, recruiting-
13RITUXGOPROFranceRTX, PlaceboNG106---Recruiting-
14COMBIVASUKBelimumab, RTX2 × 1 g31--No results availableActive, not recruiting-
15SATELITEFranceRTX, Tocilizumab, Abatacept375 mg/BSA, 500 mg42--No results availableNot yet recruiting-
16RITUXGOPROFranceRTX, placebo2 × 1 g106--No results availableRecruiting-
MAINTANCAVAS: Maintenance of ANCA Vasculitis Remission by Intermittent Rituximab Dosing; LOVAS: Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Vasculitis Induction Study; SATELITE: Salvage Therapy to Treat Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; RITUXGOPRO: Rituximab in the Treatment of Good Prognosis Microscopic Polyangiitis; NG: not given. The asterisk (*) on RAVE (RAVE) is referred to another clinical trial that conducted on AAV patients of RAVE trial with renal involvement. The RITUXVAS is the same RITUXIVAS clinical trial with 2-year results of a trial.
A phase 3 clinical trial was conducted to assess and compare the efficacy of the conventional method of the infusion of RTX and the specific infusion of RTX. The MAINRITSAN2 trial (NCT01731561) was conducted on 162 adult AAV patients in complete remission. All the patients received 500 mg RTX, which for patients in the conventional group was administrated on days 0 and 14 after randomization, and then on months 6, 12, and 18. The second group received RTX at randomization, which was re-administered whenever B-cells or ANCA titer were significantly increased. The MAINRITSAN2 trial demonstrated no significant difference between the efficacy of the customized infusion and the specified infusion of RTX in relapse rate [27]. The MAINRITSAN3 trial (NCT02433522) was carried out on 97 AAV patients in the CR of MAINRITSAN2 trial patients that experienced CR with no major relapse, with a median age of 64.6 ± 10.7 years old. The patients were randomized to the placebo or RTX group for maintenance treatment. The MAINRITSAN3 trial was conducted to increase the follow-up duration of patients under the MINRITSAN2 trial to obtain the optimal time of maintenance therapy with RTX. In this study, four doses of 500 mg RTX within 18 months (every 6 months) were infused and compared with a placebo with 28 months of follow-up. The study showed that compared to the placebo group, prolonged treatment with RTX resulted in a lower rate of disease relapse [28]. The LoVAS clinical trial (NCT02198248) was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of prednisolone administration in 140 RTX-treated (lymphoma protocol) AAV patients; 0.5 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone were considered as low-dose and high-dose regimens, respectively. Within 6 months of follow-up, 71% and 69.2% of patients in low-dose and high-dose GCs groups experienced remission, respectively, showing no significant differences between the two regimens in the induction of remission [29]. The other ongoing clinical trials registered in the US or European clinical trial registry are summarized in Table 1.

3.2.2. Non-Randomized Studies

Non-randomized studies mainly focused on the efficacy of RTX in patients with different clinical features. As one of the first studies, Keogh et al. [30] reported nine refractory GPA patients, who were successfully treated with RTX with the lymphoma protocol. Both B-lymphocyte depletion and complete clinical remission were reported after three months. The successful treatment of eight GPA and two MPO patients with RTX with the lymphoma protocol lasting for a median of 33.5 months was also reported. All patients experienced remission within 6 months; however, relapse occurred in three patients and was resolved with repeated RTX infusion, resulting in a new sustained remission [31]. A clinical study on seven refractory AAV patients with a median age of 57 years old was conducted for the long-term assessment of the safety and efficacy of RTX. It was shown that RTX provided CR in six patents and the BVAS score was significantly decreased following 12 months of 4 × 375 mg/m2/w [32]. The BIOGEAS group in Spain studied 196 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, including 19 cases of AAV. They showed that RTX therapy was associated with remission in 77% of severe refractory patients and response was more prominent in Sjogren, myopathies, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and cryoglobulinemia [33]. Several studies provide evidence that RTX is considered an induction of remission agent for refractory vasculitis [30,34,35,36,37,38], severe refractory GPA [39], non-responders to conventional therapies [31], and the re-treatment of relapsed AAV [40], or as maintenance therapy to provide long-term remission [39,41,42,43,44]; however, RTX cannot completely prevent relapse [45].

3.2.3. Case Reports

The first report of using rituximab for a GPA patient dates back to 21 years ago and resulted in the extension of studies [46]. A non-responder to conventional treatments was successfully and safely treated with RTX with the lymphoma protocol. The second patient was reported four years later and showed effective and safe remission induction [47]. In 2008, a Wegner patient resistant to conventional therapies was reported, who achieved partial remission following four doses of 500 mg RTX, which hampered pulmonary worsening [48]. Years later, the successful treatment of more complicated GPA patients, such as refractory GPA associated with several different clinical manifestations, including scleritis [49,50,51,52,53], orbital involvement [54,55,56], intestinal perforation [57], massive intracerebral hemorrhage [58], meningeal involvement [59,60], peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) [61,62], and subglottic stenosis [63] were reported. Several case series reported GPA patients treated with RTX based on the lymphoma protocol [64,65,66,67,68,69]; however, one study showed that RTX is not associated with clinical and serological refractory GPA improvement [70]. Some studies have suggested that RTX can be considered an effective replacement therapy in severe GPA patients for whom conventional therapies are contraindicated [67] or who have a poor response to conventional therapies [71]. RTX also was found to be able to induce long-term remission, up to 3 years of disease remission in a refractory GPA patient in one study [72], and in another study, up to 38 and 48 months after RTX administration [73]. Some other interesting cases also suggested that RTX could be effectively used to treat refractory childhood onset [74,75], renal transplantation [76], and even ANCA-negative GPA patients [77,78,79].

3.3. Pediatrics and Elderly

Although the clinical manifestation of AAV patients in elderly and young people is similar, the severity of AAV seems to be different based on age, whereas elderly patients are shown to be at higher risk of mortality and morbidity due to AAV [80]. Adults comprise a higher proportion of AAV patients than pediatrics [81]. Thietart et al. [82] evaluated RTX for induction and maintenance therapy in AAV patients older than 75 years. It was shown that RTX induction therapy resulted in remission in 86.4% of patients and the relapse rate was lower when RTX was used as a maintenance regimen compared to induction therapy. Another study on 31 AAV patients aged older than 60 demonstrated that RTX can induce remission in 96.7% of patients, but is associated with a high rate of infection [83].
Regarding pediatrics, PePRS (NCT01750697) is a non-randomized, uncontrolled phase II clinical trial of rituximab therapy which was carried out in severe AAV pediatric patients. This study showed that an infusion of 375 mg/BSA RTX on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 resulted in clinical improvement, which was effective for the induction of remission or as maintenance therapy [84]. Another phase II global clinical trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RTX therapy in pediatrics with GPA and MPA. The patients received 4 × 375 mg/BSA/weekly and it was shown that RTX is effective, with a similar overall safety profile to adults, which can be attributed to the adjustment of RTX dosage to body surface area [84]. Combined treatment with tapered GCs and CYC followed by 4 × 375 mg/BSA RTX as induction therapy in nine AAV patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) was effective and all patients experienced remission [85].

3.4. Dose

A multicenter study in the UK compared two different RTX dosages for induction therapy, 4 × 375 mg/m2 and 2 × 1 g, with a two-week interval, on 65 refractory AAV patients. In this survey, no difference between the two regimens was observed and response to RTX was achieved in 98 percent of patients [86]. Moreover, another study investigated low-dose RTX therapy as an induction regimen and showed that low-dose RTX therapy was effective in refractory AAV patients, which has a beneficial effect because of the expensive price [87]. Satio et al. [88] investigated a single dose of 375 mg/m2 and confirmed that a single dose of RTX is effective in MPA and was associated with decreasing economical damage. However, Moog et al. [89] showed that a single dose of RTX combined with other immunosuppressive therapies is not as effective as a licensed RTX therapy regimen. Yusof et al. [90] evaluated 35 relapsing AAV patients treated with 2 × 1 g RTX and showed that RTX therapy was associated with long-lasting remission. Moreover, no difference between the infusion amount of RTX in the two main RTX therapy regimens (4 × 375 mg/m2 and 2 × 1 g) was observed in terms of response to treatment and relapse [91].

3.5. Comparing RTX to Conventional

Some studies have investigated and compared the efficacy of RTX and other therapeutic options. RTX is another option for patients with contraindications for conventional therapies. For example, the results of a study on 11 refractory patients with PR3-AAV or for whom CYC was inadvisable showed that RTX (4 × 375 mg/m2) was able to induce remission [92]. Moreover, Roccatello et al. [93] showed that six doses of 375 mg/m2 RTX were effective in long-term remission without maintenance therapy and can be considered for patients who are intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. A retrospective study on 92 patients with GPA has shown that both RTX and CYC significantly reduced the BVAS score and successfully induced remission. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between RTX and CYC in terms of adverse events and death; however, the relative rate of complications was higher in the CYC group [94]. A retrospective study on 153 AAV patients with GN showed no significant difference between RTX and CYC for the induction of remission [95]. Tavakoli et al. [94] also reported the similar efficacy of RTX and CYC in the induction of remission.
It has been accepted that RTX could be an alternative to CYC. In a prospective study on the RAVE trial’s patients, using RTX showed promising results with a safe and more effective outcome in relapsed patients who were treated with either RTX or CYC [40]. In another comparative study of RTX and CYC on 16 GPA and 20 MPA patients, RTX was favorable for the induction of remission in the refractory AAV patients [96]. RTX is considered a promising treatment for elderly patients due to the higher risk of treatment-related side effects in AAV patients under CYC or GC treatment [83]. Additionally, RTX could provide an opportunity for the treatment of patients with high-grade CYC-related adverse events and be chosen as a first-line treatment [97]. Another study on 251 AAV patients with severe renal disease showed that although RTX and CYC both induce remission in AAV patients, CR was better induced by RTX than CYC [98]. A study on Hispanic patients showed that RTX and CYC have a similar effect on the induction of remission; however, RTX proved more effective in the prevention of relapse [82]. Although RTX was found to be as effective as CYC, it was found that RTX is more efficient than Infliximab, an anti-TNF-α agent. The analysis revealed that RTX provides better response and long-lasting CR was more achievable when compared to Infliximab. Moreover, upon the failed induction of remission in patients treated with Infliximab, RTX can induce remission in most patients [99].

3.6. Maintenance Regimen

Although RTX administration in active patients can induce disease remission, due to the repopulation of CD20+ B cells, most of the patients can show disease relapse during the first year. To avoid disease relapse in RTX-treated patients, preemptive maintenance therapy is being used. However, there is still controversy about whether patients benefit from maintenance therapy without showing any clinical symptoms of relapse and regarding efficacy, optimum dose, the interval between induction and maintenance infusions, and safety.
In a cohort study with 114 GPA patients, it was shown that administering preemptive maintenance RTX every 6 months for 18 months could lead to decreasing the daily dose of corticosteroids (median daily prednisone dose was 5 mg at 2 years in 76% of patients), a long time of disease remission (2-year relapse-free survival was reported in 85% within a median follow-up of 3.6 years) and relatively low rate of serious infection and serious adverse event rates (4.9 and 8.1 per 100 patient years, respectively) [37]. Regardless of RTX maintenance dose and intervals, a significantly higher relapse-free survival was previously reported in patients who received RTX maintenance as compared to those with a single course of RTX [100]. Frequently relapsed patients are hard-to-manage patients and it was shown that RTX therapy is effective and safe for chronic relapse patients for the induction of remission and maintaining the remission [101]. The effectiveness of maintenance therapy was also suggested by evaluating 795 GPA patients from the French Vasculitis Study Group Registry; it was shown that RTX maintenance therapy can remarkably help to achieve sustained remission (≥6 months) off therapy [102]. In another study including 66 GPA patients who received 500 mg RTX every six months until month 18, in a 34.2 ± 26.2-month follow-up, the relapse rate was 11.2/100 patient years. However, relapse occurred at a mean of 13.5 ± 14.7 months after the last RTX infusion [103]. This suggests a continuous need for RTX maintenance therapy.
Since disease relapse is because of the repopulation of B cells, patients can be either treated in a fixed-schedule manner (usually 6 months) or after the repopulation of B cells/detectable ANCA. To clarify this issue, the MAINRITSAN2 trial included 117 GPA and 45 MPA patients. Accordingly, as maintenance therapy, some patients received a 500 mg RTX infusion in the cases with the repopulation of CD19+B lymphocytes or those with the reappearance/rise of ANCA until month 18; controls received a fixed 500 mg dose of maintenance RTX every six months, regardless of cell population and ANCA titer. In both groups, at month 28, sustained remission was reported in most of the patients, while 14 of 81 (17.3%) in 13 conditional RTX-treated groups and 8 of 81 (9.9%) fixed-schedule patients showed disease relapse, which was not statistically significant. It is worth noting that those in the conditional RTX-treated group received less infusion than the control (248 vs. 381) [27]. The post hoc analysis of the MAINRITSAN2 trial was conducted to investigate the difference between the efficacies of the number of initial infusions of RTX. This analysis found no significant difference in the sustained remission rate within 12 months between patients administered RTX on the first and fourteenth days and those who only received a single infusion of 500 mg as an induction, which suggests the omission of the second infusion [104]. There are also some reports that show no significant difference between RTX maintenance therapy and conventional immunosuppressive agents. However, patients benefited from a reduced dose of corticosteroids [105].
In terms of the safety of preemptive RTX maintenance therapy, most of the studies did not find any serious issues. However, in a study performed by Besada et al. [106], despite the decreasing rate of relapse, because of side effects (mostly hypogammaglobulinemia and infections), RTX was discontinued in one-third of patients after a median of 41 months. However, during a median of 14.5 months, nobody showed disease relapse.

3.7. Combination Therapies

Following the study for the RITAZAREM trial, a high rate of disease remission in 188 relapsed AAV patients (90%) was reported after RTX therapy in combination with GC [107]. Geetha et al. [108] evaluated the possible additional benefit of adding CYC to the RTX+GC regimen in 37 AAV patients; they observed no significant differences in remission, and mortality by adding CYC to RTX and GC was observed.
Forty-nine patients with ANCA-positive state or renal-limited vasculitis were included in a prospective study. The patients were treated with low-dose CYC and RTX plus a 7-day or 14-day GC regimen. A short-term GC regimen or long-term GC regimen for the induction of remission showed a similar result; however, GC-associated adverse events were decreased [109]. Venhoff et al. [110] investigated 37 refractory AAV patients treated with RTX and conventional immunosuppressive therapies and showed that remission was achieved in almost all of the patients besides long-lasting B cell depletion. A retrospective French national study on 17 persistent AAV patients, who failed to respond to RTX or CYC, showed the high efficacy of RTX plus MTX combination therapy in persistently active GPA with predominant granulomatous manifestation [111]. One study explored 89 GPA patients and revealed that adding conventional agents (AZA, MTX, or mycophenolate mofetil) to RTX and GCs significantly decreased relapse rates without increasing adverse events [112]. Moreover, another study shows that combined RTX and CYC in refractory patients in severe relapse provides long-term remission and results in lowered CYC usage [113]. Adding CYC to the RTX developed more subsided immune agents that resulted in the rapid improvement of renal inflammation and function [114].

3.8. Organ Involvement

RTX was thought to be an effective induction treatment in small vessel vasculitis, mainly in GPA patients [115]. Complete remission was reached more frequently in GPA patients than in MPO [116]. Moreover, the PR3-ANCA patients in the RAVE trial were shown to experience sustained remission more than MPO patients [117]. Holle et al. [118] investigated the efficacy of RTX in 59 patients with refractory GPA and showed that 61.3% of patients achieved complete or partial remission. They also reported that progression was better achieved in vasculitis manifestation than in granulomatous symptoms.

3.8.1. Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT)

There are different studies on the efficacy of ENT involvement in AAV patients. In this regard, in a retrospective study, including 51 and 48 patients with and without a history of being treated with RTX, respectively, Lally et al. [119] showed that RTX is more effective than conventional therapies (i.e., AZA, MTX, CYC) in the induction of disease remission in patients with otolaryngologic manifestations. However, in another retrospective study containing 11 AAV patients, despite the significant decrease in the daily dose of prednisone, no significant improvement in patients’ otolaryngological complaints was reported [120]. In another retrospective study including 34 GPA patients with head and neck manifestations, 88% of patients responded partially or completely to the RTX within 6 months. The other 12 percent of patients achieved remission following the infusion of the second course of RTX.

3.8.2. Ocular

Several studies have investigated the efficacy of RTX in granulomatous inflammation of the eye in patients with AAV. In this regard, Lower et al. [121] showed in nine patients with refractory granulomatous eye disease that RTX is an effective agent with corticosteroid-sparing properties. Baslund et al. [122] studied 10 patients with orbital inflammation and showed that RTX therapy ameliorates visual deficiency, granuloma volume, and other manifestations. Moreover, Pelegrin et al. [123] showed that RTX therapy was effective in patients with orbital inflammation who are resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Moreover, another study showed that 80% of patients with retro-orbital granulomas responded to RTX and RTX reduced exposure to immunosuppressive drugs [124]. A retrospective study on 59 AAV patients with orbital mass showed that RTX successfully treated more patients than CYC [125]. RTX is effective in refractory ophthalmic GPA patients [126]. In a retrospective study on 63 AAV patients with ocular involvement, scleritis and episcleritis were the prominent manifestations, and in about 14 percent of patients, ophthalmic disorders were the earliest manifestations of GPA. RTX therapy was shown to be more effective than CYC in refractory patients [127]. Another retrospective study on 37 patients with ocular manifestations of AAV showed that RTX was effective in the induction of remission within 36.5 months of follow-up [128]. Although RTX provided a good response in ocular AAV patients, it should be noted that the developing retroorbital fibrosis due to the lack of inflammation resulted in diminished visual accuracy [126].

3.8.3. Renal

A retrospective study on 155 AAV patients with severe kidney disease showed that conventional therapies (CYC and GCs) responded to 51% of patients [129]. In a multicenter retrospective survey of 14 patients with positive or negative ANCA states, including those with severe renal disease, it was shown that RTX and GCs without CYC induced high-rate remission in patients and dialysis was terminated in 71% of dialysis-required patients [130]. A retrospective study on 153 AAV patients with GN showed that no significant difference was detected between RTX and CYC for the induction of remission in AAV patients with severe GN. Although no remarkable difference was observed in the setting of the remission rate, the percentage of patients without dialysis requirements in the RTX group was more than in the CYC group. However, RTX was shown to be more effective and resulted in fewer adverse events than conventional therapies in AAV patients with renal involvement [131,132] and RTX could be considered as an alternative treatment in patients resistant to conventional therapies [133,134,135,136].
Chocova et al. [137] studied 18 patients with AAV and showed that following RTX therapy, approximately 72% of patients experienced remission (CR or PR), and patients with ENT, lung, or renal involvement were not in CR. In 2011, a study on 23 AAV patients with severe renal involvement investigated the long-term efficacy of low-dose CYC combined with two infusions of 1 g RTX with a 2-week interval regime. This study showed that low-dose CYC plus RTX provides prolonged, relapse-free remission and decreased glucocorticoid usage, which reduced adverse events [138]. Later, a prospective cohort study on 66 renal AAV patients within 56 months of follow-up showed that a combined RTX-CYC-GC regimen as induction therapy followed by AZA and tapered GCs showed better responses than the conventional strategy of care. A total of 94% of patients achieved disease remission in 6 months and disease modulation was achieved earlier, while 70% of patients remained relapse-free over 5 years [139]. Another study was conducted on eight MPO-AAV patients with severe renal disease treated with a CYC-free RTX regimen. In this study, RTX provided an incomplete renal function improvement. Lack of efficacy was shown in cases that were previous non-responders and RTX recovery function was not related to the reaction to CYC [140]. Roccatello et al. [132] studied 25 AAV patients and compared the efficacy of two regimens, including RTX+CYC+GC without maintenance therapy (RTX group) and CYC+GC with AZA maintenance therapy (conventional group). CR was achieved in 93% of the RTX group and 70% in the conventional group; however, no significant difference was observed between these two groups in 6-month and 12-month renal recovery. Another study on 36 AAV patients with renal involvement showed that RTX is a favorable induction agent in relapsed AAV patients, and 41.7% and 28.6% of AAV patients under CYC and RTX faced ESRD or death, respectively [96]. Moura et al. [98] investigated the efficacy of RTX and CYC in 251 patients with severe disease and showed that no significant difference was observed between RTX and CYC in the induction of remission. However, CR within 6 months was better achieved in patients treated with RTX than with CYC, and the rate of ESRD and dialysis requirements were significantly lower in RTX-treated patients. As mentioned in the literature, the optimal regimen was not proven and further studies are needed to elucidate the best strategy in AAV with renal involvement.

3.8.4. Respiratory Tract

Tracheobronchial stenosis (TBS), including subglottic stenosis (SGS) and bronchial stenosis (BS), is one of the severe manifestations of Wegner. TBS responds poorly to GCs and conventional immunosuppressive therapies [141]. In a retrospective study on 26 patients with TBS, the remission rate of patients treated with RTX was 80%, while CYC provided remission in 20% or 17% of patients, with or without local interventions, respectively. CYC is effective in the treatment of BS, but RTX is recommended for SGS [142]. A pulmonary nodule is a common presentation of GPA; however, Henderson et al. [143] demonstrated that in GPA patients with pulmonary nodules who did not respond to conventional immunosuppression, RTX can remove the nodules and miniaturize the large nodules. A study on 19 Hispanic AAV patients with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage showed that a regimen of CYC as initial therapy followed by RTX and plasmapheresis is superior to CYC plus plasmapheresis without RTX and provides six months of survival [82].
Table 2. Non-randomized studies of RTX therapy in AAV patients.
Table 2. Non-randomized studies of RTX therapy in AAV patients.
AuthorCountryType of StudyNumber of PatientsMedian AgeSexBVAS ScoreDose of RTXInduction or Maintenance of RTXSpecial ConditionCR or PRDetails
Thietart et al., 2022 [144]FranceProspective 52 GPA
41 MPA
79.451F/42MNG4 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 g (induction)/500 mg (maintenance) BothElderly patients57/66 remissionRTX therapy achieves and maintains remission in most elderly patients
Brogan et al., 2022 [84]Multicenter Non-randomized uncontrolled clinical trial19 GPA, 6 MPA17 20F/5M* PVAS: 84 × 375 mg/m2Induction PediatricsAll CRRTX is effective and safe for children
Roccatello et al., 2022 [132]ItalyRetrospective 15 case: 11 MPA, 4 GPA; 10 control: 8 MPA, 2 GPA 69 ± 11.6 (case), 72 ± 12.4 (control)15M/10F21 (case), 23 (control)6 × 375 mg/m2InductionRenal involvement14/15 CR
7/15 CR
No significant difference between RTX+CYC+GC and CYC+GC+AZA in renal recovery
Moollan et al., 2022 [96]IrelandRetrospective20 MPA,
16 GPA
63.523M/13F15 NGInductionRenal involvementNGRTX is favored as an induction agent for relapsed AAV compared to CYC
Loftis et al., 2022 [82]USRetrospective12 MPA
7 GPA
556M/13F25NGInductionHispanic patients14 treated with RTX (10 remission,
4 died)
RTX is superior to CYC in preventing relapse
Besade et al., 2013 [106]NorwayRetrospective35 GPA4819M/16F92 × 1 gBothMaintenance therapy with RTX29 CR
4 PR
Long-term RTX was effective in prevention of relapse
Yusof et al., 2015 [90]UKProspective35 AAV5617M/18F10.52 × 1 gInductionRelapsing AAV20/35 CR
13/35 PR
2/35 NR
RTX provides long-term response
Baslund et al., 2012 [122]DenmarkProspective10 GPA503M/7FNG2 × 1 gInductionOrbital inflammation10 remissionsRTX should be considered for dangerous ophthalmic patients
Wendt et al., 2011 [41]SwedenRetrospective14 GPA
1 MPA
1 EGPA
609M/7F9.54 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 g, 2 × 0.5 g InductionRelapsing or refractory AAV12/16 CR
3/16 PR
1/16 died
RTX provides long-term remission
Venhoff et al., 2014 [110]GermanyRetrospective32 GPA
5 MPA
6221M/16F132 × 1 g, 2 × 0.5 gInductionRelapsing or refractory AAV19/37 CR
16/37 PR
1/37 NR
1/37 lost
RTX following conventional IST as maintenance therapy provided good response
Moog et al., 2014 [89] Retrospective15 GPA
2 MPA
5810M/7F131 × 375 mg/m2InductionSingle-dose RTX therapy6/17 CR
11/17 PR
Single-dose RTX plus other IS are less effective than lymphoma protocol
Wawrzycka-Adamczyk et al., 2014 [87]PolandRetrospective12 GPA505M/8F9.5Median 1 gInductionRefractory GPA11/12 remissionLow-dose RTX is effective for refractory AAV
Chasseur et al., 2020 [145]BelgiumRetrospective48 GPA
9 MPA
5729M/28F6.2 ± 2.5-InductionRTX with and without GC therapy34 CR (GC and RTX)
0 CR (RTX)
Low CR rate using RTX without GC
Brihaye et al., 2007 [64]FranceRetrospective8 GPA49.65M/3F14.34 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRelapsing/refractory GPA3 CR
3 PR
2 NR
RTX plus steroid improved clinical outcome
Takeyama et al., 2021 [105]JapanRetrospective1077344M/79F13375 mg/BSABothComparing RTX, other IST, and GC alone1- and 2-year relapse-free was 92.9% and 84.4%RTX maintenance therapy is effective and provides lower dose of GCs
Asín et al., 2019 [127]FranceRetrospective6346.133M/30FNG375 mg/BSAInductionOcular manifestation 80.9% remissionRTX induced remission in refractory patients and was more effective than CYC
Caroti et al., 2019 [140]ItalyRetrospective8541M/7F144 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gBothRenal involvement8/8 remissionRTX was effective in partial renal function recovery
Mansfield et al., 2011 [138]UKProspective13 GPA
10 MPA
5912M/11F212 × 1 g InductionSevere renal involvement23/23 RemissionRTX+low-dose CYC is effective in the induction of remission
P.McAdoo et al., 2019 [139]UKProspective666238M/28F192 × 1 g InductionRenal involvement 94% remissionCombination of GC, RTX, CYC is better than previous regimen
Menthon et al., 2011 [99]FranceProspective randomized17 (8 RTX, 9 IFX)52.9 ± 178M/9F12.64 × 375 mg/m2BothRefractory WG 3 CR
1 PR
RTX provides a higher rate of response and longer-lasting CR than Infliximab
Stasi et al., 2006 [31]Italy Prospective8 GPA
2 MPA
535M/5F5.54 × 375 mg/m2InductionRelapsing or refractory9 CR
1 PR
RTX was effective in severe patients or non-responders to standard treatment
Lally et al., 2014 [119]USRetrospective9949.8 ± 15.131M/68FNA-MaintenanceENT manifestationNo ENT active disease in 92.4%RTX results in 11-times lower rate of active symptoms than conventional therapies
Del Pero et al., 2009 [124]UKRetrospective34 GPA47.121M/13F114 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionENT manifestation21/34 CR
9/34 PR
4/34 NR
RTX provides 80% response, reduced exposure to other therapies
Casal Moura et al., 2020 [98]USRetrospective251 (64 RTX, 161 CYC)66128M/123F84 × 375 mg/m2InductionSevere renal disease 54/64 remission
Risks and benefits of CYC and RTX were balanced; adding PLEX provides no benefit
Girard et al., 2015 [142]FranceRetrospective26329M/17F8NGInductionTracheobronchial stenosis80% remission in RTX group, 42% remission in CYC groupRTX was more successful in achieving remission than CYC
Miloslavsky et al., 2014 [40]USRetrospective24 GPA
2 MPA
NGNG5.34 × 375 mg/m2InductionRe-treatment of AAV relapse17/26 CR
8/26 PR
1/26 died
Re-treatment of relapsed patients with RTX/GC was effective
Lionaki et al., 2017 [113]GreeceRetrospective29 GPA
6 MPA
48.615M/20F15.14 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRefractory relapsing AAV21.4% CR
78.6% PR
CYC plus RTX provides prolonged remission and less CYC usage
Cartin-Ceba et al., 2012 [101]USRetrospective53 GPA4625M/28F54 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gBothChronic relapsing GPA52/53 CR
1/53 PR
RTX was effective for induction and maintenance
Calich et al., 2014 [103]FranceRetrospective66 GPA50 ± 17.432M/34F9.54 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 g, 500 mg every 6 mBothLow-dose RTX as maintenance therapy25/66 CR
27/66 PR
14/66 NR
Low-dose RTX provides low-level rate of relapse
Lovric et al., 2009 [35]GermanyRetrospective13 GPA
1 MPA
1 EGPA
458M/7F124 × 375 mg/m2InductionRefractory or relapsing AAV6/15 CR
8/15 PR
1/15 NR
RTX was effective to induce remission
Mittal et al., 2021 [43]IndiaRetrospective77 GPA4028M/49F122 × 1 g,
4 × 375 mg/m2,
0.5 g every 6 m
BothRTX as induction and maintenance60% remissionRTX was effective as an induction and maintenance agent
Smith et al., 2012 [44]UKRetrospective61 GPA
12 MPA
5230M/43FDEI = 42 × 1 g,
4 × 375 mg/m2,
0.5 g every 6 m
BothRefractory or relapsing AAV61/73 CR
8/73 PR
4/73 NR
Fixed-interval RTX therapy reduces relapse risk
Ramos-Casals et al., 2010 [33]SpainProspective17 GPA
2 MPA
46.29M/10FNG--Severe refractory patients10/19 CR
3/19 PR
6/19 NR
RTX can be used for severe refractory patients
Rees et al., 2011 [34]UKRetrospective15 (11 GPA)47.29M/6FMedian BVAS 134 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRefractory vasculitisAll CRRTX was effective as an induction agent
Holle et al., 2012 [118]GermanyRetrospective595435M/24F164 × 375 mg/m2InductionComparing efficacy of RTX in granulomatous vs. vasculitis symptoms61.3% CRRTX was more effective in vasculitis than granulomatous manifestations
Gulati et al., 2021 [114]UKRetrospective cohort646639M/25F192 × 1 gInductionCombined therapy of severe AAV patients 94% CRCombined RTX, low-dose CYC, and GC resulted in early and sustained remission
Pepper et al., 2019 [109]UK, IrelandProspective4965.524M/25F16.42 × 1 gInductionGC-free regimen in severe AAV patients45/46 remission Rapid GC discontinuation in severe AAV is effective as standard therapy with fewer adverse events
Puéchal et al., 2021 [102]FranceRetrospective43453.4252M/182F15.3NGBoth10 years follow-up to assess prolonged remission without treatment-Continual remission was significantly more achieved by RTX than conventional therapies
Joshi et al., 2015 [128]UKRetrospective cohort3751.5--2 × 1 gInductionOcular GPA31/37 CR
5/37 PR
RTX effectively induces remission of ocular manifestation in AAV patients
Malm et al., 2014 [120]USRetrospective11305M/6F 4 × 375 mg/m2InductionOtolaryngologic manifestationNo improvement in otolaryngological manifestations RTX did not provide improvement in ENT manifestations
Kant et al., 2019 [85]USRetrospective9633M/6F154 × 375 mg/m2InductionAAV patients with GNAll remission Consecutive therapy with GC and CYC followed by RTX was effective
Shah et al., 2015 [130]US, Sweden, UKRetrospective6 GPA
8 MPA
618M/6FNG4 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionSevere renal disease14/14 respondedRTX plus GC regimen induced high-rate remission and dialysis withdrawal
Sorin et al., 2022 [111]FranceRetrospective17 GPA----InductionPersistent active GPA with granulomatous manifestations88% remission Combined RTX/MTX induced remission
Lower et al., 2012 [121]USRetrospective5 AAV
4 sarcoidosis
54.32M/3FNG375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gBothRefractory ocular patients5/5 respondedRTX was effective in the treatment of patients with eye disease.
Taylor et al., 2009 [126]UKRetrospective10 GPA48.25M/5FNG2 × 1 gInductionRefractory ocular patients10/10 Remissionprolonged remission was achieved using RTX
Pullerits et al., 2012 [133]SwedenRetrospective28 GPA
1 MPA
49.315M/14F64 × 375 mg/m2InductionRefractory AAV21% CR
41% PR
38% NR
RTX is an alternative option in conventional treatment-resistant patients
Chocova et al., 2015 [137]Czech RepublicProspective15 GPA
3 MPA
37.511M/7F9.54 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRelapsing or refractory AAV8/18 CR
5/18 PR
2/18 NR
2/18 died
1/18 lost
RTX is associated with remission in 72% of patients
Keogh et al., 2006 [30]USProspective10 GPA577M/3F64 × 375 mg/m2InductionSevere refractory GPA10 CRRTX was an effective induction agent for severe refractory GPA
Mc Gregor et al., 2015 [91]USProspective56 GPA
52 MPA
3 EGPA
9 renal
5055M/64FNG4 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInduction -103 remissionsTwo-dose and >2-dose RTX regimens were similar
Roccatello et al., 2011 [136]ItalyProspective5 GPA
4 MPA
2 EGPA
57.5
6M/5F226 × 375 mg/m2InductionRefractory patients11 remissionsRTX was effective in patients resistant to conventional IST
Roccatello et al., 2017 [93]ItalyProspective5 GPA
4 MPA
2 EGPA
57.5
6M/5F226 × 375 mg/m2InductionLong-term follow-up of refractory patients4/11 remained in remission
7/11 re-treated
RTX in 6 doses of 375 mg/m2 provides long-term remission
Ayan et al., 2018 [135]TurkeyRetrospective21 GPA
4 idiopathic
4411M/14FNG4 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gBothUntreated patients with conventional IST18 CR
1 died
6 ongoing diseases
RTX was effective in patients resistant to conventional IST
Knight et al., 2014 [39]SwedenRetrospective12 GPA525M/7F92 × 1 gMaintenanceSevere relapsing AAV11/12 remission
1/12 NR
RTX therapy every six months is an effective maintenance treatment
B.Jones et al., 2009 [86]UKRetrospective46 GPA
10 MPA
5 EGPA
4 other
4734M/31FDEI 44 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionComparing different regimes of RTX49/65 CR
15/65 PR
1/65 NR
No difference between the two regimes
Brihaye et al., 2007 [64]FranceRetrospective8 GPA49.65M/3F14.34 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRelapsing/refractory GPA3 CR
3 PR
2 NR
RTX plus steroids improved clinical outcome
Durel et al., 2019 [125]FranceRetrospective56 GPA
1 MPA
2 EGPA
4626M/33F9NGInductionOrbital mass64% remission with RTX vs. 26% with CYCRTX was more effective than CYC
Timlin et al., 2015 [83]USRetrospective19 GPA
12 MPA
71 ± 610M/21F4.44 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionAAV patients older than 6030/31 remission
1/31 NR
Elderly patients responded effectively to RTX
Puéchal X et al., 2019 [37]FranceRetrospective114 GPA5240M/64F9500 mg every 6 mMaintenanceLow-dose RTX as maintenance therapy86% remissionSustained remission using RTX for induction and low-dose maintenance
Azar et al., 2014 [112]USRetrospective105 GPA4950M/55F44 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionEvaluation of RTX with or without other maintenance therapies95/100 CR
1/100 PR
2/100 NR
1 died
1 lost
Conventional therapies plus RTX decrease relapse rate without increasing adverse events
Charles et al., 2013 [100]FranceRetrospective70 GPA
7 MPA
2 Renal restricted
1 EGPA
54 ± 17NG74 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gBothLong-term follow-up66% CR
25% PR
RTX was more effective as a maintenance therapy
Roll et al., 2012 [38]GermanyRetrospective50 GPA
8 MPA
50.228M/30FNG4 × 375 mg/m2, 2 × 1 gInductionRefractory AAV22/58 CR
29/58 PR
4/58 NR
RTX was effective in refractory AAV
* Pediatric Vasculitis Activity Score; IST: immunosuppressive therapies; RTX: rituximab; CYC: cyclophosphamide; GPA: granulomatous with polyangiitis; MPA: microscopic polyangiitis; EGPA: eosinophilic granulomatous with polyangiitis; CR: complete remission; PR: partial remission; NR: not remission; NG: not given; NA: not assessed; F: female; M: male.

3.9. Resolving Rare Clinical Manifestations of GPA by Rituximab

Following the first report of the successful treatment of AAV with RTX, different rare clinical manifestations were reported as having been successfully treated with RTX. Some of the most important rare clinical presentations in GPA patients, which resolved following RTX, include retrobulbar granuloma [78], refractory ophthalmic [126], pachymeningitis [146], the presence of orbital inflammation [122], long-established end-stage renal disease [147], post-kidney-transplantation glomerulonephritis-related AAV [148], pituitary GPA [149], renal mass [150], gastric ulcer [151], pancreatitis [152], ophthalmoplegia [153], pyoderma gangrenosum [154,155,156], prostatitis [157] aortic inflammation [158], intestinal involvement [159], mastitis [160], aortitis [161], gingivitis [162], Isolated Pauci-Immune Pulmonary Capillaritis [163], isolated orbital GPA [164], cranial neuropathy [165], severe necrotizing scleritis [166], genital necrosis and inflammation [167], GPA-associated subcutaneous cheek odule [168], pseudo-tumoral digital nodules [169], hypertrophic pachymeningitis [170,171], acute myocarditis [172], palpable purpura [173], central nervous system vasculitis [174], intra-cranial hypertension [175,176], tracheobronchial stenosis [142], acute aortic valve regurgitation [177], GPA-mimicking meningeal tuberculosis [178], gynecological involvement [179], GPA-mimicking lung malignancies [180], CNS ischemic lesions [181], leukocytoclastic vasculitis-induced penile necrosis [182], stem cell transplantation [183], progressive skull base osteomyelitis [184], severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss [185], nasal septal abscesses [186], oral and skin ulcer [187], nasal septal abscesses [186], membranous nephropathy [188], ventricular tachycardia [189], and hydralazine-induced AAV [190].

3.10. Unsuccessful Reports in Rituximab Therapy for GPA Patients

Despite several reports implying the high efficacy of RTX in controlling GPA, the first report of RTX therapy with a lack of efficacy in such patients was published by Aries et al. in 2006. From eight included patients, the disease activity remained unchanged in three patients and two of them even experienced disease progression, even when their peripheral blood B cells fell to zero [70]. In another study, two of eight patients did not respond to RTX and showed that vasculitis manifestation responded differently from granulomatous symptoms [64]. Moreover, Levric et al. [35] reported that one of the 15 patients with granulomatous AAV did not respond to RTX. In a study, RTX was not found effective in the improvement of patients’ otolaryngological complaints [120]. Caroti et al. [140] studied AAV patients with severe renal disease and showed that three of eight patients did not respond to the RTX. Lovric et al. [35], in their study, showed that one in 15 patients with upper-airway and eye involvement did not respond to RTX. In another study on AAV patients with ENT manifestation, 12% of patients did not respond to RTX; however, these patients achieved remission following the infusion of the second course of RTX [124]. However, another study on 11 patients with otolaryngologic manifestations did not respond to RTX and no improvement was observed in their manifestations within 23.5 months of follow-up [120]. In a multicenter study in the UK on 65 patients with refractory AAV, 98 percent achieved remission, but one patient showed no response to RTX [86]. Alesaeidi et al. [191] reported that a patient experienced pancreatitis and non-cancerous pancreatic mass as a non-first-line presentation of Wegner. Although RTX therapy resolved the complications, serious lethal infections appeared and patients were declared dead one month after the termination of RTX therapy. Paradoxical reactions to RTX were reported in some autoimmune diseases such as pemphigus vulgaris [192,193]. Regarding AAV, a study reported that six AAV patients experienced worsening disease following RTX treatment; however, they suggested not preventing the use of RTX in patients due to early complications [194]. Moreover, another study demonstrated that patients encountered exacerbation of ocular manifestation of AAV after injections of RTX [195,196], which may be due to rapid B-cell depletion causing cytokine release and the exacerbation of inflammation [197,198,199]. It is suggested that RTX should be injected with caution, especially in patients who have optic neuritis or lesions near the optic nerve. An AAV patient with upper-airway and eye disease was reported to show no response to RTX [35]. In patients with active refractory GPA, B-cell depletion by RTX is not related to the reduction in ANCA titer or the significant recovery of clinical features [70]. Collectively, based on the granulomatous or vasculitis manifestations, RTX was shown to be more effective in patients with vasculitis rather than patients with granulomatous manifestations [118], which be attributed to the late response of RTX in localized GPA manifestations [200]. It is speculated that different inflammatory ambiance in granulomatous lesions is associated with long-term granuloma and fibrous tissue formation may result in resistance to RTX therapy [201]. Furthermore, fibrous tissue may prevent the well-dissemination of a drug [202] and be responsible for a lower rate of remission in granulomatous manifestations than vasculitis manifestations. In this regard, the debulking operation of masses combined with immunosuppressive therapies resulted in successful treatment [203]. Moreover, although RTX was effective in the depletion of B-cells in peripheral blood, in situ B-cells are resistant to RTX, which can be attributed to the in situ B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and survival of B cells [204].

3.11. Safety

Similar to other medications, patients may experience some drug-related side effects along with the improvement of symptoms. However, as was reported by Jones et al. [86], no clear influence of RTX on the frequency of serious adverse events suggests benefits for patients treated with RTX. Safety concerns related to RTX’s administration could be categorized as a time of occurrence in three major categories, including infusion reactions or very early-appearing side effects (before B cell depletion), subsequent adverse events following the partial or complete depletion of B cells, and long-term RTX-related side effects. In other words, RTX-related side effects can be categorized based on the type of complications in five major categories, including infections, cytopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, malignancy, and hypersensitivity, and among them, infection is the most common side effect [124,135,205], which is divided into bacterial, viral, and fungal types [206,207]. The safety profile of the short-term and long-term follow-up of RTX therapy in AAV patients was reported similarly [208]. Moreover, the safety profile of RTX therapy in AAV was also similar to other autoimmune diseases [209] and no significant difference between RTX and CYC was observed in the total rate of adverse events [210]. In this section, we assorted the findings based on the type of complications to provide data for clinicians at the practice level for RTX therapy in AAV patients.

3.11.1. Hypersensitivity

Regarding the first category, hypersensitivity to RTX is a very early reaction that could occur in approximately one-third of AAV patients [101]. The symptoms of hypersensitivity could be very severe [138] and the development of an urticarial rash [64], anaphylaxis from RTX [37], and swelling of the hands after 48 h [124] of rituximab infusion have been reported. Some of the hypersensitivity reactions were self-limiting reaction infusions and were not repeated [124].

3.11.2. Hypogammaglobulinemia

Hypogammaglobulinemia has been another common complication of treatment with RTX [211]. This phenomenon was reported during the maintenance of RTX therapy in different studies [212]. It was reported that hypogammaglobulinemia was more frequent within the first six months of RTX therapy [213]. The incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia and its severe form was reported to be about 50% [214] and 5% of patients, respectively [115,213,215]. However, the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia varied according to the indication for RTX, whereas it was observed in 46% of pediatric lupus, 71% of autoimmune CNS disease, 60% of ANCA-associate vasculitis patients, and 12% in miscellaneous groups [213]. Using conventional immunosuppressive therapies, long-term glucocorticoid usage, kidney involvement, female gender [216], and 1 g every six months compared to the 2 g every 12 months [217] increases the risk of hypogammaglobulinemia following rituximab therapy, while subglottic involvement and orbital involvement reduces the risk [217]. Tariq et al. [218] reported that 42% of AAV patients had IgG-hypogammaglobulinemia related to RTX therapy. It is noteworthy that low IgG levels at baseline play a major role in the development of hypogammaglobinemia [212,219]. Some studies have suggested that hypogammaglobinemia increased the risk of infection in many cases [45,215,220], whereas some studies have suggested that there is no association between hypogammaglobulinemia and infection, even in severe hypogammaglobulinemia [214,216,221]. It should be noted that low levels of different types of immunoglobulins have a different result on infections that require hospitalization, wherein a low level of IgG and IgA result in an infection that requires hospitalization and a low level of IgM does not [222]. Altogether, it seems that hypogammaglobulinemia increases the risk of infection, especially those requiring hospitalization [222] in the severe form of hypogammaglobulinemia.

3.11.3. Infection

Infection is the most common complication reported following RTX therapy in AAV patients [135] and can be severe in 10% [212] or more [205] of patients. It is notable that AAV patients with concomitant infection are difficult to manage due to the increased risk of infection following immunosuppressive therapy with CYC and GCs. However, Gregersen et al. [223] showed that RTX is an alternative for AAV patients with a severe infection that is associated with no further severe infection alongside the remission of the patient.
RTX is applied as an induction of remission and maintenance treatment option. Thietart et al. [144] investigated the difference between serious infection related to the induction regimen and maintenance therapy and showed that the rate of serious infection is significantly higher in the induction of remission by RTX than in maintenance therapy. The interval between taking RTX and causing infection varied in different studies and patients, ranging from three months to one year after treatment [113,224,225], whereas severe infection mainly emerged one year after RTX therapy [224]. The incidence of infection was similar following RTX, GC, and other IS [105]. In addition, the infection rate was higher in patients treated with RTX plus CYC than in RTX alone [113]. The infection rate of AAV patients following RTX therapy was higher than RA, which is related to the systemic nature of AAV, damage to the airways that predisposed the airway to infection, and long-term specific IS drugs used for AAV [226]. It seems that some risk factors exist that increase the risk of infection, including old age [115,224], low body mass index [214], bronchiectasis, endobronchial involvement [227], kidney dysfunction [214,225], and nephritic disease treated with GC-RTX [214], which is a risks factor for other side effects as well as infection [115]. It was shown that using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis reduced the risk of infection [227].
The emerging infections following RTX therapy can be divided into bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. In addition, to increase the risk of de novo life-threatening infections, such as sepsis [32,41,228] and viral hepatitis [32], several studies warn about the risk of the reactivation of chronic infections. The most common site of infection is the respiratory tract, especially the lower respiratory tract, and also pneumonia was the most common side effect [43,108,118,229]; however, the involvement of the ear and nose was probable [40].
The most-reported infections are RTX-induced pneumonia (pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP)) [230] after six months and pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) after 3 months [231], which can also be accompanied by bronchial stenosis [35] and other major chest infections such as tuberculosis [232], candida pneumonia, and bacterial pneumonia infections [83,124], which could be fatal. Atypical mycobacterial, salmonella [41], and urinary tract infections [32] have also been reported. The incidence of PCP is high [101], whereas one study found that a WG child developed PCP after 6 months of RTX therapy [230]. Therefore, it was recommended that PCP prophylaxis should be performed at least during the depletion of B cells [101,231]; although, the incidence of PJP is 1.2% and prophylaxis is not recommended [231].
Microorganisms that cause viral infections include CMV [32,206], JC virus, herpes zoster [108], varicella zoster, HBV [32,41,232] (even in HBsAg-negative patients), and HCV [35,43]. Elevated liver enzymes after 2 weeks [41] to 11 months [35] of rituximab therapy were observed; however, hepatitis can first appear in patients who had no cirrhosis and liver failure [43]. CMV-associated gastric ulcer [233] and retinitis [41], viral gastroenteritis [40], and JC virus-associated pneumonia [232] were observed in some patients after rituximab therapy. In addition, rituximab therapy can exacerbate the manifestation and reactivation of the JC virus, occurring within 3 to 40 months after treatment [222]. Treatment with rituximab also activated herpes zoster and resulted in pneumonia-associated herpes zoster virus [34,43]. The activation of varicella zoster occurred in five events after eight months of treatment [112]. Rituximab can increase the risk of fungal infections [207]. Lower respiratory tract infection was reported as the most common infection following RTX therapy and Invasive Aspergillus accounted for a quarter of lower respiratory infections developed after 8 months of rituximab therapy [112]. There are fewer common infections after rituximab therapy reported, including cutaneous abscess, otitis media, legionella pneumonia [210], fatal H1N1 flu infection [45], tuberculosis [232], urinary tract infections [32], gastrointestinal infection [214], fatal sepsis [41], vulvovaginal pyoderma gangrenosome [234], and atypical mycobacterial infection [32]. Accordingly, to prevent such complications or minimize them, it is recommended to consider screening for chronic infection [235] before RTX administration and the employment of preemptive therapies, and, if necessary, vaccinating against bacterial and viral pathogens, monitoring white cell count and immunoglobulin levels, and prophylaxis against more frequently reported infections [232].

3.11.4. Cancer

Although there is no direct evidence for a carcinogenic effect of RTX, there are some sparse reports implying the possible carcinogenesis of RTX [32,124,138]. It was investigated that the risk of cancer in AAV patients was significantly higher than in the general population. It was shown that alongside a different pattern of cancer development based on age, sex, drugs, and ANCA type, the risk of lung and hematological cancer is mostly increased in AAV patients [236]. It is well-known that treating AAV patients with CYC increases the risk of malignancies [237], but it is clear that RTX is less carcinogenesis than CYC [238]. Rituximab therapy is one of the factors that increase the risk of cancer. It is reported that following RTX therapy, some different cancers developed, occurring several months or years after rituximab therapy, including squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus or tongue [124], breast cancer [211], non-melanoma or melanoma skin cancers [90,112], bladder cancers, papillary thyroid cancer, uterine cancer, colon cancers [19], hematologic cancers, prostate cancer [32,91], lung cancer, peritoneal cancer, renal cell carcinomas, basal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma [91].

3.11.5. Cytopenia

Cytopenia is another side effect of rituximab therapy, including leucopenia such as B-cell lymphopenia [20,35], thrombocytopenia [239], and neutropenia (late-onset) [240,241], which seem to be associated with B-lymphocyte depletion [241]. In some patients, neutropenia was observed shortly after the first dose [34,91] or the last dose [241], with some requiring hospitalization and pre-emptive antibiotic treatment [211] to control fever, but they did not need to receive granulocytes, whereas in one study it was reported that people with late-onset neutropenia (LON) improved with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [42]. One study found that 11.9% of patients with GPA and MPA developed LON after an average of 86 days of rituximab therapy. Some of these patients developed neutropenia after the first dose of treatment and some after repeated courses of rituximab [240]. Leukopenia was observed in some patients, and some of them had transient leukopenia [21,35]. In the case of thrombocytopenia, a study reported that thrombocytopenia was observed in some patients after three weekly infusions of rituximab [83].

3.11.6. Other Rare Side Effects

There are some less common side effects of rituximab, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [90], congestive heart failure (CHF) [88], ruptured aneurysm [108], venous thromboembolism (VTE) [210], anorexia nervosa [128], primary leukoencephalopathy (PML) [242], complications of orthopedic conditions such as hip replacement and bone fracture [211], pyomiosis [43], pyoderma gangrenosum [243], inflammatory vaginitis [244], herpes simplex stomatitis [222], Crohn’s disease [245], drug-induced pneumonitis [229], posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) [246,247], and transient visual disturbance [32]. Accordingly, to prevent such complications or at least minimize them, it was recommended to consider screening for chronic infection [235] before RTX administration and the employment of preemptive therapies; if necessary, vaccinating against bacterial and viral pathogens, monitoring white cell count and immunoglobulin levels, and prophylaxis against more frequently reported infections [232]. Alongside safety-related disorders, some reports of death were declared after RTX infusion, which can be mainly related to infection [210], cardiovascular complications [108], neurological complications [128], malignancy [248], respiratory failure [135], etc. [20,32,43]. It was also shown that the rate of death related to RTX therapy is higher when RTX is used as the induction of remission than maintenance therapy [144]. It should be noted that during RTX therapy, clinicians should consider these probable side effects and manage them carefully with regard to death occurring in the patients.
Table 3. Safety profile of RTX therapy in AAV patients.
Table 3. Safety profile of RTX therapy in AAV patients.
Side EffectsCommentRef.
InfectionPCP, PJP, TB, UTI, salmonella, atypical mycobacterial infection, influenza, legionella,
cutaneous abscess, GI infection, vulvovaginal pyoderma gangrenosome.
CMV, HBV, HCV, JC virus, HSV, herpes zoster, varicella zoster, aspergillus.
[32,34,35,40,41,43,45,83,101,105,108,112,113,115,118,124,135,144,205,207,210,214,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235]
HypogammaglobulinemiaHypogammaglobulinemia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in about 50% and 5% of patients. Hypogammaglobulinemia-induced infection is a controversial issue. Baseline Ig level is a substantial factor in the development of hypogammaglobulinemia. [45,115,119,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221]
CancerBreast cancer, colon, hepatocellular, hematologic, uterine, thyroid, peritoneal, renal, bladder, lung, SCC of the tongue and esophagus, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and non-melanoma skin cancer.[19,32,90,91,112,124,138,236,237,238]
CytopeniaLeucopenia (B-cell lymphopenia), which can be transient; thrombocytopenia; neutropenia, which can be late-onset.[20,21,35,42,83,211,239,240,241]
HypersensitivityHypersensitivity reaction is a first-onset complication developed in one-third of injected patients. Hypersensitivity can emerge as different symptoms such as rash and swelling.[37,64,101,124,138]
Other side effectsCHF, AMI, VTE, bone fracture, herpes simplex osteomatitis, visual disturbance, vaginitis, pyomiosis pyoderma gangrenosome, anorexia nervosa, PML, pneumonitis, Crohn’s disease, PRES, ruptured aneurysm. [20,32,43,88,90,108,128,135,144,210,211,222,229,232,235,243,244,245,246,247,248]

4. Conclusions

Current randomized and non-randomized studies have shown that RTX was effective in AAV patients. AAV can manifest with different organ involvement and RTX was more effective regarding granulomatous manifestation. Furthermore, RTX can be considered an alternative treatment option when other conventional therapies are contraindicated. RTX is an effective treatment for the induction of remission and as maintenance therapy and successfully reduces the rate of relapse. RTX can also be associated with side effects including infection, cancer, hypersensitivity, cytopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia, which should be noted when physicians prescribe RTX. In the clinical context, we suggest using RTX as a first-line treatment option, especially in patients with granulomatous manifestation, pediatrics, elderly patients, and those in whom other conventional immunosuppressive agents are contraindicated. More studies on the evaluation of combination therapies and a long-term follow-up of patients for monitoring safety could be useful to shed light on the other aspects of RTX.

Author Contributions

S.T., S.A. and M.A.H. designed the study, conducted the search, determined the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and selected the potential articles. M.A.H. and S.M.P. wrote the manuscript. M.Z. and S.H.R. extracted the data and summarized the findings. S.T. reviewed and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study has not received any funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Constant Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available within the article or are obtainable through a request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RTXRituximab
CYCCyclophosphamide
GCGlucocorticoids
AZAAzathioprine
BSABody surface area
PR3Proteinase-3
MPOMyeloperoxidase
ANCAAntineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody
AAVANCA-associated vasculitis
GPAGranulomatosis with polyangiitis
MPAMicroscopic polyangiitis
EGPAEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
ISTImmunosuppressive therapy
GM-CSFGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor

References

  1. Kitching, A.R.; Anders, H.-J.; Basu, N.; Brouwer, E.; Gordon, J.; Jayne, D.R.; Kullman, J.; Lyons, P.A.; Merkel, P.A.; Savage, C.O.S.; et al. ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Watts, R.A.; Mahr, A.; Mohammad, A.J.; Gatenby, P.; Basu, N.; Flores-Suárez, L.F. Classification, epidemiology and clinical subgrouping of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2015, 30 (Suppl. 1), i14–i22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yates, M.; Watts, R. ANCA-associated vasculitis. Clin. Med. 2017, 17, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Robson, J.; Doll, H.; Suppiah, R.; Flossmann, O.; Harper, L.; Höglund, P.; Jayne, D.; Mahr, A.; Westman, K.; Luqmani, R. Damage in the anca-associated vasculitides: Long-term data from the European vasculitis study group (EUVAS) therapeutic trials. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Falk, R.J.; Jennette, J.C. ANCA small-vessel vasculitis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1997, 8, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hilhorst, M.; van Paassen, P.; Tervaert, J.W.C. Proteinase 3-ANCA Vasculitis versus Myeloperoxidase-ANCA Vasculitis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 2314–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wu, T.; Shen, C.; Zhong, Y.; Ooi, J.D.; Zhou, Y.-O.; Chen, J.-B.; Meng, T.; Xiao, Z.; Lin, W.; Ao, X.; et al. Differences between myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) and proteinase 3-ANCA associated vasculitis: A retrospective study from a single center in China. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 21, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yates, M.; Watts, R.A.; Bajema, I.M.; Cid, M.C.; Crestani, B.; Hauser, T.; Hellmich, B.; Holle, J.U.; Laudien, M.; Little, M.A.; et al. EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, M.; Yu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M.H. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis in older patients. Medicine 2008, 87, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katsumata, Y.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Yamanaka, H. Interstitial Lung Disease with ANCA-associated Vasculitis. Clin. Med. Insights Circ. Respir. Pulm. Med. 2015, 9, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schönermarck, U.; Gross, W.L.; de Groot, K. Treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2014, 10, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faurschou, M.; Westman, K.; Rasmussen, N.; de Groot, K.; Flossmann, O.; Höglund, P.; Jayne, D.R. Brief Report: Long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate to cyclophosphamide for remission induction in early systemic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3472–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hassan, R.I.; Gaffo, A.L. Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2017, 19, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Groh, M.; Pagnoux, C.; Baldini, C.; Bel, E.; Bottero, P.; Cottin, V.; Dalhoff, K.; Dunogué, B.; Gross, W.; Holle, J.; et al. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg–Strauss) (EGPA) Consensus Task Force recommendations for evaluation and management. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 26, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Campbell, M.; McKenzie, J.E.; Sowden, A.; Katikireddi, S.V.; Brennan, S.E.; Ellis, S.; Hartmann-Boyce, J.; Ryan, R.; Shepperd, S.; Thomas, J.; et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ 2020, 368, l6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jones, R.B.; Cohen Tervaert, J.W.; Hauser, T.; Luqmani, R.; Morgan, M.D.; Peh, C.A.; Savage, C.O.; Segelmark, M.; Tesar, V.; van Paassen, P.; et al. Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide in ANCA-Associated Renal Vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jones, R.B.; Furuta, S.; Tervaert, J.W.; Hauser, T.; Luqmani, R.; Morgan, M.D.; Peh, C.A.; Savage, C.O.; Segelmark, M.; Tesar, V.; et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis: 2-year results of a randomised trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stone, J.H.; Merkel, P.A.; Spiera, R.; Seo, P.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.; St Clair, E.W.; Turkiewicz, A.; Tchao, N.K.; et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geetha, D.; Specks, U.; Stone, J.H.; Merkel, P.A.; Seo, P.; Spiera, R.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.M.; St Clair, E.W.; et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis with renal involvement. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2015, 26, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Specks, U.; Merkel, P.A.; Seo, P.; Spiera, R.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.; St Clair, E.W.; Fessler, B.J.; Ding, L.; et al. Efficacy of remission-induction regimens for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Gopaluni, S.; Smith, R.M.; Lewin, M.; McAlear, C.A.; Mynard, K.; Jones, R.B.; Specks, U.; Merkel, P.A.; Jayne, D.R. Rituximab versus azathioprine as therapy for maintenance of remission for anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (RITAZAREM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017, 18, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Miloslavsky, E.M.; Niles, J.L.; Wallace, Z.S.; Cortazar, F.B.; Fernandes, A.; Laliberte, K.; Stone, J.H. Reducing glucocorticoid duration in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A pilot trial. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2018, 48, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guillevin, L.; Pagnoux, C.; Karras, A.; Khouatra, C.; Aumaître, O.; Cohen, P.; Maurier, F.; Decaux, O.; Ninet, J.; Gobert, P.; et al. Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1771–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pugnet, G.; Pagnoux, C.; Terrier, B.; Perrodeau, E.; Puéchal, X.; Karras, A.; Khouatra, C.; Aumaître, O.; Cohen, P.; Maurier, F.; et al. Rituximab versus azathioprine for ANCA-associated vasculitis maintenance therapy: Impact on global disability and health-related quality of life. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2016, 34, S54–S59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Terrier, B.; Pagnoux, C.; Perrodeau, É.; Karras, A.; Khouatra, C.; Aumaître, O.; Cohen, P.; Decaux, O.; Desmurs-Clavel, H.; Maurier, F.; et al. Long-term efficacy of remission-maintenance regimens for ANCA-associated vasculitides. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Charles, P.; Terrier, B.; Perrodeau, É.; Cohen, P.; Faguer, S.; Huart, A.; Hamidou, M.; Agard, C.; Bonnotte, B.; Samson, M.; et al. Comparison of individually tailored versus fixed-schedule rituximab regimen to maintain ANCA-associated vasculitis remission: Results of a multicentre, randomised controlled, phase III trial (MAINRITSAN2). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Charles, P.; Perrodeau, É.; Samson, M.; Bonnotte, B.; Néel, A.; Agard, C.; Huart, A.; Karras, A.; Lifermann, F.; Godmer, P.; et al. Long-Term Rituximab Use to Maintain Remission of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Furuta, S.; Nakagomi, D.; Kobayashi, Y.; Hiraguri, M.; Sugiyama, T.; Amano, K.; Umibe, T.; Kono, H.; Kurasawa, K.; Kita, Y.; et al. Effect of Reduced-Dose vs High-Dose Glucocorticoids Added to Rituximab on Remission Induction in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 2178–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keogh, K.A.; Ytterberg, S.R.; Fervenza, F.C.; Carlson, K.A.; Schroeder, D.R.; Specks, U. Rituximab for refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis: Report of a prospective, open-label pilot trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stasi, R.; Stipa, E.; Del Poeta, G.; Amadori, S.; Newland, A.C.; Provan, D. Long-term observation of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with rituximab. Rheumatology 2006, 45, 1432–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nagafuchi, H.; Atsumi, T.; Hatta, K.; Muso, E.; Takeno, M.; Yamada, H.; Ozaki, S. Long-term safety and efficacy of rituximab in 7 Japanese patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Mod. Rheumatol. 2015, 25, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ramos-Casals, M.; García-Hernández, F.J.; de Ramón, E.; Callejas, J.L.; Martínez-Berriotxoa, A.; Pallarés, L.; Caminal-Montero, L.; Selva-O’Callaghan, A.; Oristrell, J.; Hidalgo, C.; et al. Off-label use of rituximab in 196 patients with severe, refractory systemic autoimmune diseases. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2010, 28, 468–476. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rees, F.; Yazdani, R.; Lanyon, P. Long-term follow-up of different refractory systemic vasculitides treated with rituximab. Clin. Rheumatol. 2011, 30, 1241–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lovric, S.; Erdbruegger, U.; Kümpers, P.; Woywodt, A.; Koenecke, C.; Wedemeyer, H.; Haller, H.; Haubitz, M. Rituximab as rescue therapy in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A single-centre experience with 15 patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2009, 24, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tamura, N.; Matsudaira, R.; Hirashima, M.; Ikeda, M.; Tajima, M.; Nawata, M.; Morimoto, S.; Kaneda, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Hashimoto, H.; et al. Two cases of refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis successfully treated with rituximab. Intern. Med. 2007, 46, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Puéchal, X.; Iudici, M.; Calich, A.L.; Vivot, A.; Terrier, B.; Régent, A.; Cohen, P.; Jeunne, C.L.; Mouthon, L.; Ravaud, P.; et al. Rituximab for induction and maintenance therapy of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A single-centre cohort study on 114 patients. Rheumatology 2019, 58, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roll, P.; Ostermeier, E.; Haubitz, M.; Lovric, S.; Unger, L.; Holle, J.; Kötter, I.; Henes, J.C.; Bergner, R.; Rubbert-Roth, A.; et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: Results from a German registry (GRAID). J. Rheumatol. 2012, 39, 2153–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Knight, A.; Hallenberg, H.; Baecklund, E. Efficacy and safety of rituximab as maintenance therapy for relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis—A case series. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 33, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Miloslavsky, E.M.; Specks, U.; Merkel, P.A.; Seo, P.; Spiera, R.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.; St Clair, E.W.; Tchao, N.K.; et al. Rituximab for the treatment of relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2014, 66, 3151–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Wendt, M.; Gunnarsson, I.; Bratt, J.; Bruchfeld, A. Rituximab in relapsing or refractory ANCA-associated vasculitis: A case series of 16 patients. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2012, 41, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rhee, E.P.; Laliberte, K.A.; Niles, J.L. Rituximab as maintenance therapy for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 5, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mittal, S.; Naidu, G.; Jha, S.; Rathi, M.; Nada, R.; Minz, R.W.; Sharma, K.; Dhir, V.; Jain, S.; Sharma, A. Experience with similar biologic rituximab in 77 patients of granulomatosis with polyangiitis-a real-life experience. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 40, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Smith, R.M.; Jones, R.B.; Guerry, M.J.; Laurino, S.; Catapano, F.; Chaudhry, A.; Smith, K.G.; Jayne, D.R. Rituximab for remission maintenance in relapsing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3760–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Roubaud-Baudron, C.; Pagnoux, C.; Méaux-Ruault, N.; Grasland, A.; Zoulim, A.; Le Guen, J.; Prud’homme, A.; Bienvenu, B.; de Menthon, M.; Camps, S.; et al. Rituximab maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. J. Rheumatol. 2012, 39, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Specks, U.; Fervenza, F.C.; McDonald, T.J.; Hogan, M.C. Response of Wegener’s granulomatosis to anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44, 2836–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kallenbach, M.; Duan, H.; Ring, T. Rituximab induced remission in a patient with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Nephron. Clin. Pract. 2005, 99, c92–c96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kowalewska, B.; Szechiński, J.; Roszkowska, E. Wegener’s granulomatosis effectively treated with rituximab: A case study. Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2008, 118, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Recillas-Gispert, C.; Serna-Ojeda, J.C.; Flores-Suárez, L.F. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory scleritis in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015, 253, 2279–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. You, C.; Ma, L.; Lasave, A.F.; Foster, C.S. Rituximab Induction and Maintenance Treatment in Patients with Scleritis and Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2018, 26, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheung, C.M.; Murray, P.I.; Savage, C.O. Successful treatment of Wegener’s granulomatosis associated scleritis with rituximab. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 89, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmed, A.; Foster, C.S. Cyclophosphamide or Rituximab Treatment of Scleritis and Uveitis for Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Ophthalmic. Res. 2019, 61, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Weng, X.; Iwata, D.; Namba, K.; Suzuki, K.; Mizuuchi, K.; Nakamura, H.; Atsumi, T.; Ishida, S. Posterior scleritis with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis utilizing rituximab therapy to maintain remission: A case report. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2022, 25, 101333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Andrada-Elena, M.; Ioana, T.T.; Mihaela, F.M.; Irina-Elena, C.; Andrei, T.I.; Florian, B. Wegener’s granulomatosis with orbital involvement: Case report and literature review. Rom. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 65, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Avshovich, N.; Boulman, N.; Slobodin, G.; Zeina, A.R.; Rosner, I.; Rozenbaum, M. Refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis: Effect of rituximab on granulomatous bilateral orbital involvement. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2009, 11, 566–568. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Dalkilic, E.; Alkis, N.; Kamali, S. Rituximab as a new therapeutic option in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A report of two cases. Mod. Rheumatol. 2012, 22, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dag, M.S.; Pehlivan, Y.; Tutar, E.; Kisacik, B. Rituximab seems a promising therapeutic option in granulomatosis with polyangiitis with intestinal perforation: A case report and literature review. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 2013, bcr2012007518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Memet, B.; Rudinskaya, A.; Krebs, T.; Oelberg, D. Wegener granulomatosis with massive intracerebral hemorrhage: Remission of disease in response to rituximab. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2005, 11, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bawa, S.; Mukhtyar, C.; Edmonds, S.; Webley, M. Refractory Wegener’s meningitis treated with rituximab. J. Rheumatol. 2007, 34, 900–901. [Google Scholar]
  60. Benucci, M.; Li Gobbi, F.; Panconesi, P.; Manfredi, M.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Atzeni, F. Granulomatosis polyangiitis associated with meningeal involvement: Response to rituximab therapy after failure of cyclophosphamide. Reumatismo 2013, 65, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Freidlin, J.; Wong, I.G.; Acharya, N. Rituximab treatment for peripheral ulcerative keratitis associated with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 91, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ebrahimiadib, N.; Modjtahedi, B.S.; Roohipoor, R.; Anesi, S.D.; Foster, C.S. Successful Treatment Strategies in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis-Associated Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis. Cornea 2016, 35, 1459–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. An, J.; Song, J.W. Life-Threatening Subglottic Stenosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Case Report. Medicina 2021, 57, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Brihaye, B.; Aouba, A.; Pagnoux, C.; Cohen, P.; Lacassin, F.; Guillevin, L. Adjunction of rituximab to steroids and immunosuppressants for refractory/relapsing Wegener’s granulomatosis: A study on 8 patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2007, 25, S23–S27. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sánchez-Cano, D.; Callejas-Rubio, J.L.; Ortego-Centeno, N. Effect of rituximab on refractory Wegener granulomatosis with predominant granulomatous disease. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2008, 14, 92–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ferraro, A.J.; Day, C.J.; Drayson, M.T.; Savage, C.O. Effective therapeutic use of rituximab in refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2005, 20, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Bachmeyer, C.; Cadranel, J.F.; Demontis, R. Rituximab is an alternative in a case of contra-indication of cyclophosphamide in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2005, 20, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seo, P.; Specks, U.; Keogh, K.A. Efficacy of rituximab in limited Wegener’s granulomatosis with refractory granulomatous manifestations. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 2017–2023. [Google Scholar]
  69. Omdal, R.; Wildhagen, K.; Hansen, T.; Gunnarsson, R.; Kristoffersen, G. Anti-CD20 therapy of treatment-resistant Wegener’s granulomatosis: Favourable but temporary response. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2005, 34, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Aries, P.M.; Hellmich, B.; Voswinkel, J.; Both, M.; Nolle, B.; Holl-Ulrich, K.; Lamprecht, P.; Gross, W.L. Lack of efficacy of rituximab in Wegener’s granulomatosis with refractory granulomatous manifestations. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Oristrell, J.; Bejarano, G.; Jordana, R.; Monteagudo, M.; Marí, B.; Casanovas, A.; Tolosa, C. Effectiveness of rituximab in severe Wegener’s granulomatosis: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Open Respir. Med. J. 2009, 3, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Tektonidou, M.G.; Skopouli, F.N. Sustained 3-year remission after rituximab treatment in a patient with refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2006, 24, S103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Henes, J.C.; Kanz, L.; Koetter, I. Rituximab and leflunomide for Wegener’s granulomatosis: A long-term follow-up. Rheumatol. Int. 2011, 31, 425–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Patel, A.M.; Lehman, T.J. Rituximab for severe refractory pediatric Wegener granulomatosis. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2008, 14, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Plumb, L.A.; Oni, L.; Marks, S.D.; Tullus, K. Paediatric anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: An update on renal management. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2018, 33, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Hermle, T.; Goestemeyer, A.K.; Sweny, P.; Burns, A. Successful therapeutic use of rituximab in refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis after renal transplantation. Clin. Nephrol. 2007, 68, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Khan, A.; Lawson, C.A.; Quinn, M.A.; Isdale, A.H.; Green, M.J. Successful Treatment of ANCA-Negative Wegener’s Granulomatosis with Rituximab. Int. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 2010, 846063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Ooka, S.; Maeda, A.; Ito, H.; Omata, M.; Yamada, H.; Ozaki, S. Treatment of refractory retrobulbar granuloma with rituximab in a patient with ANCA-negative Wegener’s granulomatosis: A case report. Mod. Rheumatol. 2009, 19, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kimura, K.; Fujii, Y.; Maekawa, M.; Tsukamoto, H. Successful rituximab treatment in a patient with ANCA-negative granulomatosis with polyangitis: A case report. Mod. Rheumatol. Case Rep 2022, 6, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hoganson, D.D.; From, A.M.; Michet, C.J. ANCA vasculitis in the elderly. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2008, 14, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jariwala, M.P.; Laxer, R.M. Primary Vasculitis in Childhood: GPA and MPA in Childhood. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Loftis, C.E.; Dulgheru, E.C.; White, R. Disease Severity and Response to Induction Therapy in Hispanic Patients With Antineutrophilic Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Vasculitis-Related Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage. Cureus 2022, 14, e24470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Timlin, H.; Lee, S.M.; Manno, R.L.; Seo, P.; Geetha, D. Rituximab for remission induction in elderly patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2015, 45, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Brogan, P.; Yeung, R.S.M.; Cleary, G.; Rangaraj, S.; Kasapcopur, O.; Hersh, A.O.; Li, S.; Paripovic, D.; Schikler, K.; Zeft, A.; et al. Phase IIa Global Study Evaluating Rituximab for the Treatment of Pediatric Patients With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis or Microscopic Polyangiitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2022, 74, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kant, S.; Habbach, A.; Gapud, E.J.; Manno, R.L.; Gattu, R.; Seo, P.; Geetha, D. Sequential Therapy for Remission Induction in Severe Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Glomerulonephritis. Am. J. Nephrol. 2019, 50, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jones, R.B.; Ferraro, A.J.; Chaudhry, A.N.; Brogan, P.; Salama, A.D.; Smith, K.G.C.; Savage, C.O.S.; Jayne, D.R.W. A multicenter survey of rituximab therapy for refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 2156–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wawrzycka-Adamczyk, K.; Zugaj, A.; Włudarczyk, A.; Kosałka, J.; Sznajd, J.; Bazan-Socha, S.; Musiał, J. Lower doses of rituximab in remission induction for refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Przegl. Lek. 2014, 71, 663–665. [Google Scholar]
  88. Saito, A.; Takeuchi, Y.; Kagaya, S.; Ojima, Y.; Fukami, H.; Sato, H.; Matsuda, K.; Nagasawa, T. Remission Induction Therapy with Rituximab for Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Feasibility Study. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2017, 242, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Moog, P.; Probst, M.; Kuechle, C.; Hauser, C.; Heemann, U.; Thuermel, K. Single-dose rituximab for remission induction and maintenance therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A retrospective analysis of 17 patients. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2014, 43, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Md Yusof, M.Y.; Vital, E.M.; Das, S.; Dass, S.; Arumugakani, G.; Savic, S.; Rawstron, A.C.; Emery, P. Repeat cycles of rituximab on clinical relapse in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Identifying B cell biomarkers for relapse to guide retreatment decisions. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. McGregor, J.G.; Hogan, S.L.; Kotzen, E.S.; Poulton, C.J.; Hu, Y.; Negrete-Lopez, R.; Kidd, J.M.; Katsanos, S.L.; Bunch, D.O.; Nachman, P.H.; et al. Rituximab as an immunosuppressant in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.–Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2015, 30 (Suppl. 1), i123–i131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Keogh, K.A.; Wylam, M.E.; Stone, J.H.; Specks, U. Induction of remission by B lymphocyte depletion in eleven patients with refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Roccatello, D.; Sciascia, S.; Rossi, D.; Alpa, M.; Naretto, C.; Radin, M.; Fenoglio, R.; Baldovino, S.; Menegatti, E. The “4 plus 2” rituximab protocol makes maintenance treatment unneeded in patients with refractory ANCA-associated vasculitis: A 10 years observation study. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 52072–52077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Chaleshtori, M.T.; Farajzadegan, Z.; Salesi, M. A comparison of rituximab with cyclophosphamide in terms of efficacy and complications as induction therapy for treating granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A three-center study. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2022, 9, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Morel, P.; Karras, A.; Porcher, R.; Belenfant, X.; Audard, V.; Rafat, C.; Hanouna, G.; Beaudreuil, S.; Vilain, C.; Hummel, A.; et al. Management of severe renal disease in anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody-associated vasculitis: Place of rituximab and plasma exchange? Rheumatology 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Moollan, N.; Ahmed, A.R.; Denton, M. Management and Outcomes of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis at a Tertiary Healthcare Facility. Autoimmune. Dis. 2022, 2022, 4808806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nanda, S. Rituximab has similar short-term safety and efficacy to cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Casal Moura, M.; Irazabal, M.V.; Eirin, A.; Zand, L.; Sethi, S.; Borah, B.J.; Winters, J.L.; Moriarty, J.P.; Cartin-Ceba, R.; Berti, A.; et al. Efficacy of Rituximab and Plasma Exchange in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis with Severe Kidney Disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020, 31, 2688–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. de Menthon, M.; Cohen, P.; Pagnoux, C.; Buchler, M.; Sibilia, J.; Détrée, F.; Gayraud, M.; Khellaf, M.; Penalba, C.; Legallicier, B.; et al. Infliximab or rituximab for refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis: Long-term follow up. A prospective randomised multicentre study on 17 patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2011, 29, S63–S71. [Google Scholar]
  100. Charles, P.; Néel, A.; Tieulié, N.; Hot, A.; Pugnet, G.; Decaux, O.; Marie, I.; Khellaf, M.; Kahn, J.E.; Karras, A.; et al. Rituximab for induction and maintenance treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitides: A multicentre retrospective study on 80 patients. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Cartin-Ceba, R.; Golbin, J.M.; Keogh, K.A.; Peikert, T.; Sánchez-Menéndez, M.; Ytterberg, S.R.; Fervenza, F.C.; Specks, U. Rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s): Ten-year experience at a single center. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3770–3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Puéchal, X.; Iudici, M.; Pagnoux, C.; Karras, A.; Cohen, P.; Maurier, F.; Quéméneur, T.; Lifermann, F.; Hamidou, M.; Mouthon, L.; et al. Sustained Remission of Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis After Discontinuation of Glucocorticoids and Immunosuppressant Therapy: Data From the French Vasculitis Study Group Registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2021, 73, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Calich, A.L.; Puéchal, X.; Pugnet, G.; London, J.; Terrier, B.; Charles, P.; Mouthon, L.; Guillevin, L. Rituximab for induction and maintenance therapy in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Results of a single-center cohort study on 66 patients. J. Autoimmun. 2014, 50, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Charles, P.; Dechartres, A.; Terrier, B.; Cohen, P.; Faguer, S.; Huart, A.; Hamidou, M.; Agard, C.; Bonnotte, B.; Samson, M.; et al. Reducing the initial number of rituximab maintenance-therapy infusions for ANCA-associated vasculitides: Randomized-trial post-hoc analysis. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 2970–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Takeyama, Y.; Ono, N.; Shirahama, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Ueda, N.; Nishimura, N.; Nagano, S.; Uchino, A.; Miyamura, T.; et al. Rituximab maintenance therapy for patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in Japan. Mod. Rheumatol. 2021, 31, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Besada, E.; Koldingsnes, W.; Nossent, J.C. Long-term efficacy and safety of pre-emptive maintenance therapy with rituximab in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: Results from a single centre. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 2041–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Smith, R.M.; Jones, R.B.; Specks, U.; Bond, S.; Nodale, M.; Aljayyousi, R.; Andrews, J.; Bruchfeld, A.; Camilleri, B.; Carette, S.; et al. Rituximab as therapy to induce remission after relapse in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Geetha, D.; Hruskova, Z.; Segelmark, M.; Hogan, J.; Morgan, M.D.; Cavero, T.; Eriksson, P.; Seo, P.; Manno, R.L.; Dale, J.; et al. Rituximab for treatment of severe renal disease in ANCA associated vasculitis. J. Nephrol. 2016, 29, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pepper, R.J.; McAdoo, S.P.; Moran, S.M.; Kelly, D.; Scott, J.; Hamour, S.; Burns, A.; Griffith, M.; Galliford, J.; Levy, J.B.; et al. A novel glucocorticoid-free maintenance regimen for anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis. Rheumatology 2019, 58, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Venhoff, N.; Niessen, L.; Kreuzaler, M.; Rolink, A.G.; Hässler, F.; Rizzi, M.; Voll, R.E.; Thiel, J. Reconstitution of the peripheral B lymphocyte compartment in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides treated with rituximab for relapsing or refractory disease. Autoimmunity 2014, 47, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sorin, B.; Samson, M.; Durel, C.A.; Diot, E.; Guichard, I.; Grados, A.; Limal, N.; Régent, A.; Cohen, P.; Dion, J.; et al. Rituximab plus methotrexate combination as a salvage therapy in persistently active granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Rheumatology 2022, 61, 2619–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Azar, L.; Springer, J.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S. Rituximab with or without a conventional maintenance agent in the treatment of relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s): A retrospective single-center study. Arthritis Rheum. 2014, 66, 2862–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lionaki, S.; Fragoulis, G.E.; Venetsanopoulou, A.; Vlachoyiannopoulos, P.; Boletis, J.N.; Tzioufas, A.G. Cyclophosphamide followed by rituximab for aggressive multiple-relapsing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017, 35 (Suppl. 103), 155–164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Gulati, K.; Edwards, H.; Prendecki, M.; Cairns, T.D.; Condon, M.; Galliford, J.; Griffith, M.; Levy, J.B.; Tam, F.W.K.; Tanna, A.; et al. Combination treatment with rituximab, low-dose cyclophosphamide and plasma exchange for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Kidney Int. 2021, 100, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rymarz, A.; Matyjek, A.; Sułek-Jakóbczyk, M.; Mosakowska, M.; Niemczyk, S. Impaired Kidney Function Associated with Increased Risk of Side Effects in Patients with Small Vessel Vasculitis Treated with Rituximab as an Induction Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Unizony, S.; Villarreal, M.; Miloslavsky, E.M.; Lu, N.; Merkel, P.A.; Spiera, R.; Seo, P.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.M.; et al. Clinical outcomes of treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis based on ANCA type. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 1166–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Miloslavsky, E.M.; Specks, U.; Merkel, P.A.; Seo, P.; Spiera, R.; Langford, C.A.; Hoffman, G.S.; Kallenberg, C.G.; St Clair, E.W.; Tchao, N.K.; et al. Outcomes of nonsevere relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with glucocorticoids. Arthritis Rheum. 2015, 67, 1629–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Holle, J.U.; Dubrau, C.; Herlyn, K.; Heller, M.; Ambrosch, P.; Noelle, B.; Reinhold-Keller, E.; Gross, W.L. Rituximab for refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis): Comparison of efficacy in granulomatous versus vasculitic manifestations. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lally, L.; Lebovics, R.S.; Huang, W.T.; Spiera, R.F. Effectiveness of rituximab for the otolaryngologic manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Arthritis Care Res. 2014, 66, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Malm, I.J.; Mener, D.J.; Kim, J.; Seo, P.; Kim, Y.J. Otolaryngological progression of granulomatosis with polyangiitis after systemic treatment with rituximab. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2014, 150, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lower, E.E.; Baughman, R.P.; Kaufman, A.H. Rituximab for refractory granulomatous eye disease. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2012, 6, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Baslund, B.; Wiencke, A.K.; Rasmussen, N.; Faurschou, M.; Toft, P.B. Treatment of orbital inflammation with rituximab in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30, S7–S10. [Google Scholar]
  123. Pelegrin, L.; Jakob, E.; Schmidt-Bacher, A.; Schwenger, V.; Becker, M.; Max, R.; Lorenz, H.M.; Mackensen, F. Experiences with rituximab for the treatment of autoimmune diseases with ocular involvement. J. Rheumatol. 2014, 41, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Martinez Del Pero, M.; Chaudhry, A.; Jones, R.B.; Sivasothy, P.; Jani, P.; Jayne, D. B-cell depletion with rituximab for refractory head and neck Wegener’s granulomatosis: A cohort study. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2009, 34, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Durel, C.A.; Hot, A.; Trefond, L.; Aumaitre, O.; Pugnet, G.; Samson, M.; Abad, S.; Belot, A.; Blanchard-Delaunay, C.; Cohen, P.; et al. Orbital mass in ANCA-associated vasculitides: Data on clinical, biological, radiological and histological presentation, therapeutic management, and outcome from 59 patients. Rheumatology 2019, 58, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Taylor, S.R.; Salama, A.D.; Joshi, L.; Pusey, C.D.; Lightman, S.L. Rituximab is effective in the treatment of refractory ophthalmic Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 1540–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, M.A.; Charles, P.; Rothschild, P.R.; Terrier, B.; Brézin, A.; Mouthon, L.; Guillevin, L.; Puéchal, X. Ocular involvement in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A single-center cohort study on 63 patients. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Joshi, L.; Tanna, A.; McAdoo, S.P.; Medjeral-Thomas, N.; Taylor, S.R.; Sandhu, G.; Tarzi, R.M.; Pusey, C.D.; Lightman, S. Long-term Outcomes of Rituximab Therapy in Ocular Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: Impact on Localized and Nonlocalized Disease. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 1262–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lee, T.; Gasim, A.; Derebail, V.K.; Chung, Y.; McGregor, J.G.; Lionaki, S.; Poulton, C.J.; Hogan, S.L.; Jennette, J.C.; Falk, R.J.; et al. Predictors of treatment outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitis with severe kidney failure. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN 2014, 9, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Shah, S.; Hruskova, Z.; Segelmark, M.; Morgan, M.D.; Hogan, J.; Lee, S.K.; Dale, J.; Harper, L.; Tesar, V.; Jayne, D.R.; et al. Treatment of severe renal disease in ANCA positive and negative small vessel vasculitis with rituximab. Am. J. Nephrol. 2015, 41, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fabris, J.L.; Jaramillo, G.; Torres, R.; Rosselli, C.; Olivares, C. Renal compromise in a patient with Wegener’s granulomatosis: Clinical case and literature review. Rev. Colomb. Nefrol. 2017, 4, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Roccatello, D.; Sciascia, S.; Murgia, S.; Quattrocchio, G.; Ferro, M.; De Simone, E.; Naretto, C.; Barreca, A.; Sammartino, A.; Rossi, D.; et al. Treating Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis and Very Severe Renal Injury With an Intensified B Cell Depletion Therapy: Comparison With a Control Cohort Receiving a Conventional Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 777134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Pullerits, R.; Ljevak, M.; Vikgren, J.; Bokarewa, M. Off-trial evaluation of the B cell-targeting treatment in the refractory cases of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: Long-term follow-up from a single centre. Scand. J. Immunol. 2012, 76, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Eriksson, P. Nine patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive vasculitis successfully treated with rituximab. J. Intern. Med. 2005, 257, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Ayan, G.; Esatoglu, S.N.; Hatemi, G.; Ugurlu, S.; Seyahi, E.; Melikoglu, M.; Fresko, I.; Ozdogan, H.; Yurdakul, S.; Hamuryudan, V. Rituximab for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis: Experience of a single center and systematic review of non-randomized studies. Rheumatol. Int. 2018, 38, 607–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Roccatello, D.; Sciascia, S.; Rossi, D.; Alpa, M.; Naretto, C.; Russo, A.; Menegatti, E.; Baldovino, S. Long-term effects of rituximab added to cyclophosphamide in refractory patients with vasculitis. Am. J. Nephrol. 2011, 34, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chocova, Z.; Hruskova, Z.; Mareckova, H.; Svobodova, B.; Duskova, D.; Bednarova, V.; Jancova, E.; Rysava, R.; Tesar, V. Rituximab use in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: Clinical efficacy and impact on immunological parameters. Clin. Rheumatol. 2015, 34, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mansfield, N.; Hamour, S.; Habib, A.M.; Tarzi, R.; Levy, J.; Griffith, M.; Cairns, T.; Cook, H.T.; Pusey, C.D.; Salama, A.D. Prolonged disease-free remission following rituximab and low-dose cyclophosphamide therapy for renal ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2011, 26, 3280–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. McAdoo, S.P.; Medjeral-Thomas, N.; Gopaluni, S.; Tanna, A.; Mansfield, N.; Galliford, J.; Griffith, M.; Levy, J.; Cairns, T.D.; Jayne, D.; et al. Long-term follow-up of a combined rituximab and cyclophosphamide regimen in renal anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2019, 34, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Caroti, L.; Cirami, C.L.; Di Maria, L.; Larti, A.; Carta, P.; Dervishi, E.; Farsetti, S.; Tsalouchos, A.; Novelli, L.; Minetti, E.E. Rituximab in relapsing and de novo MPO ANCA-associated vasculitis with severe renal involvement: A case series. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Hayashi, K.; Watanabe, H.; Yamamura, Y.; Asano, Y.; Katayama, Y.; Hiramatsu-Asano, S.; Ohashi, K.; Morishita, M.; Narazaki, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; et al. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis with obstructive pneumonia progressing to hypertrophic pachymeningitis: A case report. Medicine 2021, 100, e24028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Girard, C.; Charles, P.; Terrier, B.; Bussonne, G.; Cohen, P.; Pagnoux, C.; Cottin, V.; Cordier, J.F.; Guillevin, L. Tracheobronchial Stenoses in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Wegener’s): A Report on 26 Cases. Medicine 2015, 94, e1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Henderson, S.R.; Copley, S.J.; Pusey, C.D.; Ind, P.W.; Salama, A.D. Prolonged B Cell Depletion With Rituximab is Effective in Treating Refractory Pulmonary Granulomatous Inflammation in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (GPA). Medicine 2014, 93, e229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Thietart, S.; Karras, A.; Augusto, J.F.; Philipponnet, C.; Carron, P.L.; Delbrel, X.; Mesbah, R.; Blaison, G.; Duffau, P.; El Karoui, K.; et al. Evaluation of Rituximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Patients 75 Years and Older With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2220925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Chasseur, P.; Blockmans, D.; von Frenckell, C.; Nicolas, J.B.; Regniers, C.; Vandergheynst, F. Rituximab prescription patterns and efficacy in the induction treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in a Belgian multicenter cohort. Acta Clin. Belg. 2020, 75, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Just, S.A.; Knudsen, J.B.; Nielsen, M.K.; Junker, P. Wegener’s Granulomatosis Presenting with Pachymeningitis: Clinical and Imaging Remission by Rituximab. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011, 2011, 608942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Malina, M.; Schaefer, B.; Waldherr, R.; Wühl, E.; Schaefer, F.; Schmitt, C.P. Late recovery of renal function by rituximab in a patient with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2013, 28, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Murakami, C.; Manoharan, P.; Carter-Monroe, N.; Geetha, D. Rituximab for remission induction in recurrent ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis postkidney transplant. Transpl. Int. 2013, 26, 1225–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Hughes, J.; Barkhoudarian, G.; Ciarlini, P.; Laws, E.R.; Mody, E.; Inzucchi, S.E.; Woodmansee, W.W. Refractory pituitary granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s) treated with rituximab. Endocr. Pract. 2013, 19, e1–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lo Gullo, A.; Bajocchi, G.; Cassone, G.; Cavazza, A.; Zanichelli, M.; Salvarani, C. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as a renal mass successfully treated with rituximab. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2014, 32, S138. [Google Scholar]
  151. Malik, M.; Ismail, M.; Pattanaik, D. Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Presenting as Gastric Ulcer: An Unusual Initial Manifestation Successfully Treated With Rituximab. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 350, 338–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Çakar, M.; Yilmaz, S.; Çinar, M. Successful treatment of PR3-ANCA positive vasculitis with pancreatitis as the first manifestation with rituximab. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 2209–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Díez-Morrondo, C.; Pantoja, L.; Fernández, R.; Brañanova, P.; López, A.; Alexis, D. Good response to rituximab in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and pulmonary, renal manifestations and ophthalmoplegia. Acta Reumatol. Port. 2016, 41, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  154. Murthy, R.K.; Jackson, J.; Chatham, W.W.; Sami, N. Extensive Pyoderma Gangrenosum Associated with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis with Both Responsive to Rituximab. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 22, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Donmez, S.; Pamuk, O.N.; Gedik, M.; Ak, R.; Bulut, G. A case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and pyoderma gangrenosum successfully treated with infliximab and rituximab. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 17, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sen, M.; Dogra, S.; Rathi, M.; Sharma, A. Successful treatment of large refractory pyoderma gangrenosum-like presentation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis by rituximab. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 2200–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Shaukat, M.S.; Ocon, A.J.; Peredo, R.A.; Bhatt, B.D. Prostatitis, a rare presentation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, successfully treated with rituximab and prednisone. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pineda Bernal, L.; Bitencourt, N.; Batra, K.; Solow, E.B. Successful use of rituximab in granulomatosis with polyangiitis with aortic inflammation. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 37 (Suppl. 117), 144–147. [Google Scholar]
  159. Sato, H.; Shima, K.; Sakata, H.; Ohtoh, T. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis with intestinal involvement successfully treated with rituximab and surgery. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e230355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ali, Y.; Khudadah, M.; Alali, M.; George, S.; Abdulsalam, A. Treating Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Presenting as Mastitis With Rituximab. Arch. Rheumatol. 2018, 34, 241–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Skeik, N.; Hari, G.; Nasr, R. Aortitis caused by antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: A case-based review. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 1983–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Hernández, I.A.; Friesen, R.; McGaw, T.; Levin, L. Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Mistaken as a Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Case Report. Clin. Adv. Periodontics. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Lewinter, K.E.; Cidon, M.; Warren, M.; Bansal, M. Successful Induction Treatment With Rituximab of Isolated Pauci-Immune Pulmonary Capillaritis Presenting as Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in a Pediatric Patient. Chest 2020, 158, e225–e227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Riancho-Zarrabeitia, L.; Peiró Callizo, E.; Drake-Pérez, M.; García Montesinos, B.; Terán, N.; Martínez-Taboada, V.M. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis with isolated orbital involvement in children: A case report successfully treated with Rituximab and review of literature. Acta Reumatol. Port. 2019, 44, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Horiuchi, K.; Oshima, Y.; Kudo, A. Successful Treatment with Rituximab for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and Multiple Cranial Neuropathies. Intern. Med. 2021, 60, 1095–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Murthy, S.I.; Shah, S.; Bagga, B.; Dudam, R. Rituximab therapy combined with methotrexate for severe necrotizing scleritis in a case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 68, 1981–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Paxton, L.; Champion De Crespigny, P.; Nicholls, K. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis complicated by genital involvement: Sustained response to rituximab. Intern. Med. J. 2021, 51, 444–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Hayashi, M.; Kaieda, S.; Kawaguchi, A.; Tsutsumi, M.; Harada, Y.; Koga, T.; Akiba, J.; Hoshino, T.; Ida, H. Subcutaneous Cheek Nodule Associated with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Intern. Med. 2021, 60, 3823–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Aitmehdi, R.; Moguelet, P.; Godot, S.; Chazerain, P.; Senet, P.; Barbaud, A.; Frances, C.; Chasset, F. Response to rituximab of pseudotumoral digital nodules in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: A case report. Dermatologic. Ther. 2020, 33, e13479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shimojima, Y.; Kishida, D.; Hineno, A.; Yazaki, M.; Sekijima, Y.; Ikeda, S.I. Hypertrophic pachymeningitis is a characteristic manifestation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A retrospective study of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Sharma, A.; Kumar, S.; Wanchu, A.; Lal, V.; Singh, R.; Gupta, V.; Singh, S.; Gupta, A. Successful treatment of hypertrophic pachymeningitis in refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis with rituximab. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010, 29, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Wang, C.R.; Tsai, Y.S.; Tsai, H.W. Acute Myocarditis in Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-positive Microscopic Polyangiitis and Receiving Rituximab Therapy. J. Rheumatol. 2019, 46, 1645–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Wat, J.; Wat, M.; Honda, K. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as palpable purpura with sinusitis, hemoptysis, and lung cavitation. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2020, 47, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Messmer, B.; Butts, M. Relapsing Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis Treated With Rituximab. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 26, e206–e207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Diegues, A.; Tavares, J.; Sá, D.; Oliveira, J.; Fernandes, D.; Santos, J.; Rocha, G. Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: Recurrence or Treatment Consequences? Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2021, 8, 002448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wu, X.; Mancuso, E.; Armendi, I.; Krasinski, D.; Liu, L.; Tarsi, S.; Waz, W.R.; Abdul-Aziz, R.; Elenberg, E. Renal Involvement and Its Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Proteinase-3 Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Positive Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Case Series. Cureus 2021, 13, e18197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Uijtterhaegen, G.; De Donder, L.; Ameloot, E.; Lefebvre, K.; Van Dorpe, J.; De Pauw, M.; François, K. Aortic valve replacement due to granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case series. Eur. Heart J. Case Rep. 2020, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Haridas, V.; Haridas, K. Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) Mimicking Tuberculosis. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2017, 65, 102–103. [Google Scholar]
  179. Bastone, P.; Squifflet, J.L.; Marbaix, E.; Houssiau, F. Successful treatment of gynaecological involvement of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis) by rituximab. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2015, 33, S142–S144. [Google Scholar]
  180. Han, M.; Pan, C. A case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis mimicking lung malignancy. Respirol. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e0824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Araújo, T.; Maia, R.; Massano, J.; Mendonça, L.; Guimarães, J. From Kidney to Brain: An Uncommon Severe Relapse of Myeloperoxidase Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (MPO-ANCA) Vasculitis. Cureus 2021, 13, e14205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Moseley, I.; Greenberg, R.; Wasserman, M.; Thavaseelan, S.; Cancian, M. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis leading to penile necrosis and ischemia of the bladder and urethra. Urol. Case Rep. 2022, 40, 101902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Raja, A.; Afridi, S.M.; Noe, M.M.; Jain, A. Cytoplasmic Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (C-ANCA) Vasculitis: An Uncommon Complication After Stem Cell Transplantation. Cureus 2022, 14, e25445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Qureshi, H.A.; Bandhlish, A.; DeConde, R.P.; Humphreys, I.M.; Abuzeid, W.M.; Jafari, A. Initial Presentation of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis as Progressive Skull Base Osteomyelitis. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2022, 84, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Koenen, L.; Elbelt, U.; Olze, H.; Zappe, S.; Dommerich, S. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis in a patient with polydipsia, facial nerve paralysis, and severe otologic complaints: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 16, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ishikawa, T.; Suzuki, J.; Shirai, T.; Koizumi, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Hishinuma, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Katori, Y. Presence of Phlebitis in Aseptic Nasal Septal Abscess Complicated with Ulcerative Colitis; Possible Association with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Case Report. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2022, 258, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Al Salihi, M.O.; Dominguez, B.; Mohanlal, V.; Carlan, S.J. Oral and Lower Extremity Ulcers as the Initial Presentation of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Case Rep. Med. 2022, 2022, 2737242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Yoshida, S.; Hanai, S.; Nakagomi, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Takahashi, K.; Furuya, F. Membranous Nephropathy with Proteinase 3-ANCA-associated Vasculitis Successfully Treated with Rituximab. Intern. Med. 2021, 60, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sultan, N.; Mushtaq, F.; Noor, N.; Ullah, Z.; Saleem, A.A. Role of Rituximab in miraculous cessation of ventricular tachycardia in Granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case report. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2022, 72, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Alawneh, D.; Edrees, A. Hydralazine-Induced Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2022, 14, e24132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Alesaeidi, S.; Hashemi-Amir, S.Y.; Piri, S.M.; Tavakolpour, S. Fatal Outcome of Rituximab in an ANCA Negative Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Patient with Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Mass. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2021, 17, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Nili, A.; Tavakolpour, S.; Mahmoudi, H.; Noormohammadpour, P.; Balighi, K.; Daneshpazhooh, M. Paradoxical reaction to rituximab in patients with pemphigus: A report of 10 cases. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2020, 42, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Mahmoudi, H.; Balighi, K.; Tavakolpour, S.; Daneshpazhooh, M. Unexpected worsening of pemphigus vulgaris after rituximab: A report of three cases. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 71, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Alesaeidi, S.; Piri, S.M.; Tavakolpour, S. The Paradoxical Reaction to Rituximab in Six Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Patients: How Could it be Explained and Managed? Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2021, 17, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Babu, K.; Dharmanand, B.G. Worsening of posterior scleritis and orbital pseudotumor in a patient with granulomatosis polyangiitis with rituximab-A case report. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 68, 1986–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Shih, C.B.; Wang, Y.C.; Lai, C.C. Ocular and orbital exacerbation after rituximab therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 54, e237–e241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Malviya, G.; Anzola, K.L.; Podestà, E.; Laganà, B.; Del Mastro, C.; Dierckx, R.A.; Scopinaro, F.; Signore, A. (99m)Tc-labeled rituximab for imaging B lymphocyte infiltration in inflammatory autoimmune disease patients. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2012, 14, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kasi, P.M.; Tawbi, H.A.; Oddis, C.V.; Kulkarni, H.S. Clinical review: Serious adverse events associated with the use of rituximab—A critical care perspective. Crit. Care 2012, 16, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Suhler, E.B.; Lim, L.L.; Beardsley, R.M.; Giles, T.R.; Pasadhika, S.; Lee, S.T.; de Saint Sardos, A.; Butler, N.J.; Smith, J.R.; Rosenbaum, J.T. Rituximab therapy for refractory orbital inflammation: Results of a phase 1/2, dose-ranging, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014, 132, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Tarzi, R.M.; Pusey, C.D. Current and future prospects in the management of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis). Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2014, 10, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Perry, S.R.; Rootman, J.; White, V.A. The clinical and pathologic constellation of Wegener granulomatosis of the orbit. Ophthalmology 1997, 104, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ostri, C.; Heegaard, S.; Prause, J.U. Sclerosing Wegener’s granulomatosis in the orbit. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008, 86, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Fechner, F.P.; Faquin, W.C.; Pilch, B.Z. Wegener’s granulomatosis of the orbit: A clinicopathological study of 15 patients. Laryngoscope 2002, 112, 1945–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Cambridge, G.; Stohl, W.; Leandro, M.J.; Migone, T.S.; Hilbert, D.M.; Edwards, J.C. Circulating levels of B lymphocyte stimulator in patients with rheumatoid arthritis following rituximab treatment: Relationships with B cell depletion, circulating antibodies, and clinical relapse. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Thery-Casari, C.; Euvrard, R.; Mainbourg, S.; Durupt, S.; Reynaud, Q.; Durieu, I.; Belot, A.; Lobbes, H.; Cabrera, N.; Lega, J.C. Severe infections in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides receiving rituximab: A meta-analysis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Hilal, T. Fatal cytomegalovirus disease after combination therapy with corticosteroids and rituximab for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Case. Rep. Rheumatol. 2015, 2015, 538137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Besada, E.; Nossent, J.C. Infection risks during longterm rituximab therapy change over time. J. Rheumatol. 2013, 40, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Merkel, P.A.; Niles, J.L.; Mertz, L.E.; Lehane, P.B.; Pordeli, P.; Erblang, F. Long-Term Safety of Rituximab in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and in Microscopic Polyangiitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 1372–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. van Vollenhoven, R.F.; Fleischmann, R.M.; Furst, D.E.; Lacey, S.; Lehane, P.B. Longterm Safety of Rituximab: Final Report of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Clinical Trial Program over 11 Years. J. Rheumatol. 2015, 42, 1761–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Miyazaki, Y.; Nakayamada, S.; Kubo, S.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Sakata, K.; Iwata, S.; Miyagawa, I.; Nakano, K.; Tanaka, Y. Favorable efficacy of rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients with excessive B cell differentiation. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Alberici, F.; Smith, R.M.; Jones, R.B.; Roberts, D.M.; Willcocks, L.C.; Chaudhry, A.; Smith, K.G.; Jayne, D.R. Long-term follow-up of patients who received repeat-dose rituximab as maintenance therapy for ANCA-associated vasculitis. Rheumatology 2015, 54, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Cortazar, F.B.; Pendergraft, W.F., 3rd; Wenger, J.; Owens, C.T.; Laliberte, K.; Niles, J.L. Effect of Continuous B Cell Depletion with Rituximab on Pathogenic Autoantibodies and Total IgG Levels in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2017, 69, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Khojah, A.M.; Miller, M.L.; Klein-Gitelman, M.S.; Curran, M.L.; Hans, V.; Pachman, L.M.; Fuleihan, R.L. Rituximab-associated Hypogammaglobulinemia in pediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 2019, 17, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Odler, B.; Windpessl, M.; Krall, M.; Steiner, M.; Riedl, R.; Hebesberger, C.; Ursli, M.; Zitt, E.; Lhotta, K.; Antlanger, M.; et al. The Risk of Severe Infections Following Rituximab Administration in Patients With Autoimmune Kidney Diseases: Austrian ABCDE Registry Analysis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Wade, S.D.; Kyttaris, V.C. Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Rheumatol. Int. 2021, 41, 1115–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Tieu, J.; Smith, R.M.; Gopaluni, S.; Kumararatne, D.S.; McClure, M.; Manson, A.; Houghton, S.; Jayne, D.R.W. Rituximab Associated Hypogammaglobulinemia in Autoimmune Disease. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 671503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Besada, E.; Koldingsnes, W.; Nossent, J.C. Serum immunoglobulin levels and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinaemia during long-term maintenance therapy with rituximab in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 1818–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Tariq, A.; Akenroye, A.; Azar, A.; Seo, P.; Geetha, D. Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Incidence and time course. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2022, 9, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Besada, E. Low immunoglobulin levels increase the risk of severe hypogammaglobulinemia in granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients receiving rituximab. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Besada, E.; Bader, L.; Nossent, H. Sustained hypogammaglobulinemia under rituximab maintenance therapy could increase the risk for serious infections: A report of two cases. Rheumatol. Int. 2013, 33, 1643–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Melega, S.; Brogan, P.; Cleary, G.; Hersh, A.O.; Kasapcopur, O.; Rangaraj, S.; Yeung, R.S.M.; Zeft, A.; Cooper, J.; Pordeli, P.; et al. Evaluation of Serious Infection in Pediatric Patients with Low Immunoglobulin Levels Receiving Rituximab for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis or Microscopic Polyangiitis. Rheumatol. Ther. 2022, 9, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Shah, S.; Jaggi, K.; Greenberg, K.; Geetha, D. Immunoglobulin levels and infection risk with rituximab induction for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Clin. Kidney J. 2017, 10, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Gregersen, J.W.; Chaudhry, A.; Jayne, D.R. Rituximab for ANCA-associated vasculitis in the setting of severe infection. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2013, 42, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Segelmark, L.; Flores-Suárez, L.; Mohammad, A. Severe infections in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis treated with rituximab. Rheumatology 2021, 61, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Li, Z.Y.; Chen, M.; Zhao, M.H. Severe Infections following Rituximab Treatment in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Kidney Dis. 2021, 7, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. van Vollenhoven, R.F.; Emery, P.; Bingham, C.O., 3rd; Keystone, E.C.; Fleischmann, R.; Furst, D.E.; Macey, K.; Sweetser, M.; Kelman, A.; Rao, R. Longterm safety of patients receiving rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 37, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Kronbichler, A.; Kerschbaum, J.; Gopaluni, S.; Tieu, J.; Alberici, F.; Jones, R.B.; Smith, R.M.; Jayne, D.R.W. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis prevents severe/life-threatening infections following rituximab in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Braun-Moscovici, Y.; Butbul-Aviel, Y.; Guralnik, L.; Toledano, K.; Markovits, D.; Rozin, A.; Nahir, M.A.; Balbir-Gurman, A. Rituximab: Rescue therapy in life-threatening complications or refractory autoimmune diseases: A single center experience. Rheumatol. Int. 2013, 33, 1495–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Arulkumaran, N.; Suleman, R.; Cecconi, M.; Kiely, P.; Chua, F. Rituximab associated pneumonitis in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2012, 18, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Hugle, B.; Solomon, M.; Harvey, E.; James, A.; Wadhwa, A.; Amin, R.; Bell-Peter, A.; Benseler, S. Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia following rituximab treatment in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010, 62, 1661–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Besada, E.; Nossent, J.C. Should Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis be recommended with Rituximab treatment in ANCA-associated vasculitis? Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 32, 1677–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Nixon, A.; Ogden, L.; Woywodt, A.; Dhaygude, A. Infectious complications of rituximab therapy in renal disease. Clin. Kidney J. 2017, 10, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Ishtiaq, R.; Wilhelm, D.M.; Ahmad, S. CMV gastric ulcer in a patient with pauci immune crescentic glomerulonephritis on rituximab—A rare combination. Postgrad. Med. 2019, 131, 619–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Vikse, J.; Rygh, A.; Kaisen, K.; Omdal, R. Life-threatening rituximab-induced pyoderma gangrenosum successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2017, 46, 413–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Viganò, M.; Mangia, G.; Lampertico, P. Management of patients with overt or resolved hepatitis B virus infection undergoing rituximab therapy. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 1019–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Ahn, S.S.; Han, M.; Yoo, J.; Jung, S.M.; Song, J.J.; Park, Y.-B.; Jung, I.; Lee, S.-W. Risk of Cancers in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Results from the Korea National Health Insurance Claims Database 2010–2018. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  237. Shang, W.; Ning, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, M.; Guo, S.; Han, M.; Zeng, R.; Ge, S.; Xu, G. Incidence of Cancer in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. van Daalen, E.E.; Rizzo, R.; Kronbichler, A.; Wolterbeek, R.; Bruijn, J.A.; Jayne, D.R.; Bajema, I.M.; Rahmattulla, C. Effect of rituximab on malignancy risk in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1064–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Endo, Y.; Koga, T.; Ishida, M.; Fujita, Y.; Tsuji, S.; Takatani, A.; Shimizu, T.; Sumiyoshi, R.; Igawa, T.; Umeda, M.; et al. Rituximab-induced Acute Thrombocytopenia in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Intern. Med. 2018, 57, 2247–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  240. Knight, A.; Sundström, Y.; Börjesson, O.; Bruchfeld, A.; Malmström, V.; Gunnarsson, I. Late-onset neutropenia after rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 45, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Tesfa, D.; Ajeganova, S.; Hägglund, H.; Sander, B.; Fadeel, B.; Hafström, I.; Palmblad, J. Late-onset neutropenia following rituximab therapy in rheumatic diseases: Association with B lymphocyte depletion and infections. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 2209–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Molloy, E.S.; Calabrese, L.H. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatic diseases: Evolving role of biologic therapies. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3043–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Vikse, J.; Jonsdottir, K.; Kvaløy, J.T.; Wildhagen, K.; Omdal, R. Tolerability and safety of long-term rituximab treatment in systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Yockey, L.; Dowst, S.; Zonozi, R.; Huizenga, N.; Murphy, P.; Laliberte, K.; Rosenthal, J.; Niles, J.L.; Mitchell, C.M. Inflammatory vaginitis in women on long-term rituximab treatment for autoimmune disorders. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Fraser, D.; Boyle, S.; Amft, N. Perianal Crohn Disease after Treatment with Rituximab for Active Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 43, 2199–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  246. Gong, Y.; Lam, A.; Paul, V. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after first rituximab transfusion for treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2022, 15, e248864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Asakawa, S.; Arai, S.; Kawagoe, M.; Ohata, C.; Ono, W.; Murata, H.; Tamura, Y.; Uchida, S.; Shibata, S.; Fujigaki, Y. A Young Patient with Microscopic Polyangiitis Requiring Hemodialysis with Complications of Repeated Episodes of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Probably Due to Different Etiologies. Intern. Med. 2022, 61, 1423–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Cartin-Ceba, R.; Diaz-Caballero, L.; Al-Qadi, M.O.; Tryfon, S.; Fervenza, F.C.; Ytterberg, S.R.; Specks, U. Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage Secondary to Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Predictors of Respiratory Failure and Clinical Outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2016, 68, 1467–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Biology 11 01767 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Habibi, M.A.; Alesaeidi, S.; Zahedi, M.; Hakimi Rahmani, S.; Piri, S.M.; Tavakolpour, S. The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review. Biology 2022, 11, 1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121767

AMA Style

Habibi MA, Alesaeidi S, Zahedi M, Hakimi Rahmani S, Piri SM, Tavakolpour S. The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review. Biology. 2022; 11(12):1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Habibi, Mohammad Amin, Samira Alesaeidi, Mohadeseh Zahedi, Samin Hakimi Rahmani, Seyed Mohammad Piri, and Soheil Tavakolpour. 2022. "The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review" Biology 11, no. 12: 1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop